[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 60 (Tuesday, March 29, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 0]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-7304]
[[Page Unknown]]
[Federal Register: March 29, 1994]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket No. RP91-41-021]
Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.; Proposed Changes in FERC Gas
Tariff
March 23, 1994.
Take notice that on March 18, 1994, Columbia Gas Transmission
Corporation (Columbia) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following proposed tariff
sheets, to be effective April 18, 1994:
First Revised Sheet No. 58
First Revised Sheet No. 59
First Revised Sheet No. 60
First Revised Sheet No. 64
First Revised Sheet No. 65
First Revised Sheet No. 66
First Revised Sheet No. 70
First Revised Sheet No. 71
First Revised Sheet No. 72
First Revised Sheet No. 78
First Revised Sheet No. 79
First Revised Sheet No. 80
First Revised Sheet No. 84
First Revised Sheet No. 85
First Revised Sheet No. 86
Second Revised Sheet No. 94
Original Sheet No. 95
Columbia states that it tendered this filing in order to
reinstitute its implementation of Order No. 528 as it relates to
certain pipelines. Specifically, Columbia proposes to flow through
refunds and additional billings received from Texas Eastern
Transmission Corporation, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, Texas Gas
Transmission Corporation, and Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company. In
addition, Columbia proposes to complete the reallocation of amounts
previously collected from its customers pursuant to earlier filings by
these companies under Order No. 500. Columbia states that this action
is being taken to partially implement an order issued by the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the Third Circuit in In Re Columbia Gas System Inc., 997
F.2d 1039 (3rd Cir., 1993). This decision authorized Columbia to flow
through to its customers refunds received from upstream pipelines after
its bankruptcy which relate to periods prior to the bankruptcy.
Accordingly, by this filing, Columbia is proposing to return to its
customers approximately $135.5 million in refunds received pursuant to
Order No. 528. In addition, Columbia is proposing to flow through
certain additional billings which have been paid with approval of the
Bankruptcy Court.
Columbia states that copies of the filings were served upon
Columbia's jurisdictional customers, interested state commission, and
upon each person designated on the official service list compiled by
the Commission's Secretary in Docket Nos. RP88-187; RP89-181; RP89-214;
RP89-229; TM89-3-21; TM89-4-21; TM89-5-21; TM89-7-21; RP90-26; TM90-2-
21; TM90-5-21; TM90-6-21; TM90-7-21; TM90-8-21; TM90-10-21; TM90-12-21;
TM90-13-21; TM91-2-21; TM91-9-21; TM91-10-21; RP91-41; RP91-90 and
RP91-201.
Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20046, in accordance with Rule 211 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such protests should
be filed on or before March 30, 1994. Protests will be considered by
the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies
of Columbia's filing are on file with the Commission and are available
for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 94-7304 Filed 3-28-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
