[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 60 (Wednesday, March 29, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 16047-16051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-7697]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 936
Oklahoma Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),
Interior.
ACTION: Final rule, approval of amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: OSM is approving a proposed amendment to the Oklahoma
regulatory program (hereinafter referred to as the ``Oklahoma
program'') under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977
(SMCRA). The proposed amendment consists of recodification of
Oklahoma's coal mining rules and revisions to the rules pertaining to
hydrologic balance requirements for siltation structures, sedimentation
pond storage volume, subsidence control and public notice, road
systems, protection of underground [[Page 16048]] mining, and soil
removal, stockpiling, and replacement requirements for prime farmland.
Oklahoma submitted the amendment with the intent of revising its rules
to be consistent with the corresponding Federal regulations, clarifying
ambiguities, and improving operational efficiency.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 29, 1995.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James H. Moncrief, Telephone: (918) 581-6430.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Oklahoma Program
On January 19, 1981, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally
approved the Oklahoma program. General background information on the
Oklahoma program, including the Secretary's findings, the disposition
of comments, and the conditions of approval of the Oklahoma program can
be found in the January 19, 1981, Federal Register (46 FR 4902).
Subsequent actions concerning Oklahoma's program and program amendments
can be found at 30 CFR 936.15, 936.16, and 936.30.
II. Submission of Amendment
On September 14, 1994, Oklahoma submitted a proposed amendment to
its program pursuant to SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq., administrative
record No. OK-963). Oklahoma submitted the proposed amendment in part
at its own initiative and in part with the intent of revising the
Oklahoma program to be consistent with the corresponding Federal
regulations.
Oklahoma proposed to revise the Oklahoma Coal Rules and Regulations
at Department of Mines/Rules and Regulations (DOM/RR) sections 816.46
and 817.46, hydrologic balance and siltation structures; section
823.12, prime farmland soil removal; section 823.13, prime farmland
soil stockpiling; and section 823.14, prime farmland soil replacement.
Oklahoma also proposed to recodify its rules in accordance with the
standards set forth by the Oklahoma State Legislature and the Office of
Administrative Code.
OSM announced receipt of the proposed amendment in the September
27, 1994, Federal Register (59 FR 49223), provided an opportunity for a
public hearing or meeting on its substantive adequacy, and invited
public comment on its adequacy (administrative record No. OK-963.03).
Because no one requested a public hearing or meeting, none was held.
The public comment period ended on October 27, 1994.
During its review of the amendment, OSM identified concerns
relating to the provisions of recodified Oklahoma Administrative Code
(OAC) 460:20-27-20(b) and 460:20-31-17(b), primary road certification
requirements for road systems and transportation facilities. OSM also
identified concerns with Oklahoma's proposed rule recodification
relating to OAC 460:20-43-12(f)(8), sedimentation pond storage volume;
OAC 460:20-43-47 and 460:20-43-48, subsidence control for surface
mining activities; OAC 460:20-45-28, protection of underground mining;
and various editorial and citation inconsistencies. OSM notified
Oklahoma of the concerns by letter dated November 22, 1994
(administrative record No. OK-963.08).
By letter dated December 20, 1994, Oklahoma responded to the
concerns identified in OSM's November 22, 1994, letter by submitting
the revised amendment and additional explanatory information
(administrative record No. OK-963.10). The provisions that Oklahoma
proposed to revise and add were: OAC 460:20-27-20(b) and 460:20-31-
17(b), concerning the as-built requirements regarding primary road
certification for road systems and transportation facilities; OAC
460:20-43-12(f)(8), concerning the requirement that sediment shall be
removed from a structure when the sediment storage volume is 80 percent
filled; OAC 460:20-45-47 and 460:20-45-48, concerning subsidence
control for surface mining activities; and OAC 460:20-45-28, concerning
the protection of underground mining. Oklahoma also proposed revisions
to and provided additional explanatory information for the
recodification of its coal mining rules.
Based upon the revisions to and additional explanatory information
for the proposed program amendment submitted by Oklahoma, OSM reopened
the public comment period in the December 30, 1994, Federal Register
(59 FR 67694; administrative record No. OK-963.12). The public comment
period closed on January 17, 1995.
After the closing of the reopened comment period, OSM became aware
that both Oklahoma's September 14, 1994, and December 20, 1994,
amendment submittals contained a number of rule revisions that were
previously approved by OSM on December 18, 1990 (55 FR 51902), and
promulgated by Oklahoma on July 25, 1994. Because the previously
approved provisions were formatted in such a manner so as to appear as
if they were being submitted for the first time, OSM, in both the
September 27, 1994, and December 30, 1994, Federal Register notices
opening and reopening the public comment period, inadvertently
identified those previously approved Oklahoma rules as being currently
proposed revisions to the Oklahoma program. To alleviate confusion as
to which provisions were actually unapproved when submitted to OSM for
approval, this notice addresses only the unapproved provisions
submitted by Oklahoma.
III. Director's Findings
As discussed below, the Director, in accordance with SMCRA and 30
CFR 732.15 and 732.17, finds that the proposed program amendment
submitted by Oklahoma on September 14, 1994, and as revised by it on
December 20, 1994, is no less effective than the corresponding Federal
regulations. The Director approves the proposed amendment.
1. Nonsubstantive Recodification of Oklahoma's Rules
Oklahoma, in accordance with the standards set forth by the
Oklahoma State Legislature and the Oklahoma Office of Administrative
Code, proposed to recodify its coal mining rules as OAC title 460,
chapter 20, with underlying subchapters specifying the various surface
and underground coal mining provisions.
Oklahoma's proposed recodification of its rules is nonsubstantive
in nature, and the Director finds that the recodification does not make
its rules less effective than the Federal regulations. Therefore, the
Director approves the proposed recodification. OSM uses Oklahoma's
recodified rule citations throughout this Federal Register notice.
2. Substantive Revisions to Oklahoma's Rules That Are Substantively
Identical to the Corresponding Provisions of the Federal Regulations
Oklahoma proposed revisions to OAC 460:20-49-5(a)(1), 460:20-49-6,
and 460:20-49-7(5), concerning soil removal, stockpiling, and
replacement requirements for prime farmland, that are substantive in
nature and contain language that is substantively identical to the
requirements of the corresponding Federal regulations at 30 CFR 701.5,
823.12(c)(1), and 823.14(e).
Because these proposed Oklahoma rules are substantively identical
to the corresponding provisions of the Federal regulations, the
Director finds that they are no less effective than the Federal
regulations. The Director approves these proposed
rules. [[Page 16049]]
3. OAC 460:20-27-20(b), 460:20-31-17(b), 460:20-43-53(1), and 460:20-
45-53(1), Primary Road Certification Requirements for Road Systems and
Transportation Facilities
Oklahoma proposed to revise its rules by moving the ``as-built''
certification requirements for primary roads from its permitting rules
at OAC 460:20-27-20(b) and 460:20-31-17(b) to its performance standard
rules at 460:20-43-53(1) and 460:20-45-53(1). As-built certifications
ensure that structures are constructed as designed.
The Federal as-built regulations at 30 CFR 816.151(a) and
817.151(a) require, in pertinent part, that the construction or
reconstruction of primary roads shall be certified in a report to the
regulatory authority by a qualified, registered, professional engineer,
or in any State which authorizes land surveyors to certify the
construction or reconstruction of primary roads, a qualified,
registered, professional land surveyor with experience in the design
and construction of roads.
Oklahoma's moving of its as-built requirements for primary roads
from the permitting requirements of OAC 460:20-27-20(b) and 460:20-31-
17(b) to the performance standard requirements of OAC 460:20-43-53(1)
and 460:20-45-53(1) is consistent with the as-built counterpart Federal
regulations at 30 CFR 816.151(a) and 817.151(a), which are contained in
the Federal road performance standards.
The Director finds that Oklahoma's proposed revisions to OAC
460:20-43-53(1), and 460:20-45-53(1) are no less effective than the
Federal regulations at 30 CFR 816.151(a) and 817.151(a). The Director
approves Oklahoma's rule revisions.
4. OAC 460:20-43-12(b)(3) and 460:20-45-12(b)(3), Certification of
Construction of Siltation Structures by Qualified, Registered
Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors
At OAC 460:20-43-12(b)(3) and 460:20-45-12(b)(3), Oklahoma proposed
to delete the references to OAC 460:20-27-14(a) and 460:20-31-9(a).
Existing OAC 460:20-43-12(b)(3) and 460:20-45-12(b)(3) authorize both
qualified, registered professional engineers and land surveyors in
Oklahoma to certify the construction of siltation structures; existing
referenced OAC 460:20-27-14(a) and 460:20-31-9(a) authorize only
qualified, registered professional engineers to certify design plans
for siltation structures. OSM approved these existing rules on December
18, 1990, (finding No. 2, 55 FR 51902, 51903-4) on the basis that the
by-laws of the Oklahoma State Board of Registration of Professional
Engineers and Surveyors authorizes qualified, registered professional
engineers to certify the construction and design of siltation
structures but authorizes qualified, professional land surveyors to
certify only the construction of siltation structures. In this
approval, OSM found Oklahoma's rules to be no less effective than the
corresponding Federal regulations at 30 CFR 816.46(b)(3) and
817.46(b)(3).
Oklahoma's proposed deletions in the construction certification
rules at OAC 460:20-43-12(b)(3) and 460:20-45-12(b)(3) of the
references to the design certification rules at OAC 460:20-27-14(a) and
460:20-31-9(a) eliminate any possible confusion on what certifications
qualified, registered professional engineers and land surveyors can
make under the approved Oklahoma program.
Oklahoma's proposed revisions to OAC 460:20-43-12(b)(3) and 460:20-
45-12(b)(3) deleting the references to OAC 460:20-27-14(a) and 460:20-
31-9(a) are consistent with OSM's previous approval and are no less
effective than the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 816.46(b)(3) and
817.46(b)(3). Accordingly, the Director approves Oklahoma's rule
revisions.
5. OAC 460:20-43-12(f)(8), Sedimentation Pond Storage Volume
Oklahoma proposed to revise OAC 460:20-43-12(f)(8) to delete the
requirement that sediment be removed from a sedimentation pond when the
sediment storage volume is 80 percent filled. It did so to be
consistent with its rule at OAC 460:20-43(c)(1)(C)(vi) and the Federal
regulations at 30 CFR 816.46(c)(iii)(F) that require that ponds be
maintained to provide periodic sediment removal sufficient to maintain
adequate volume for the design event. Oklahoma's proposed deletion of
OAC 460:20-43-12(f)(8) alleviates the regulatory inconsistency in its
rules with the provision at OAC 460:20-43-12(c)(1)(C)(vi) and is
consistent with and no less effective than the Federal regulations at
30 CFR 816.46(c)(iii)(F). Accordingly, the Director approves Oklahoma's
proposed rule revision.
6. OAC 460:20-43-47 and 48, Subsidence Control and Public Notice
Oklahoma proposed to revise its surface mining activities
performance standards provisions at OAC 460:20-43-47 and 48 to add
subsidence control and public notice measures that apply to underground
mining activities. Oklahoma explained that it was doing so because it
issues underground mine permits pursuant to the surface mine
requirements included in Subchapter 43 (administrative record No. OK-
963.10).
The Federal regulations corresponding to OAC 460:20-43-47 and 48
are at 30 CFR 817.121 and 817.122. These Oklahoma rules include the
same subsidence control and notice requirements as these Federal
regulations. However, OSM notes it has proposed revisions to 30 CFR
817.121 to comply with revisions to SMCRA made by the Energy Policy Act
of 1992 (58 FR 50174, September 24, 1993). Once OSM promulgates new
regulations, it will notify Oklahoma in accordance with 30 CFR
732.17(d) of any necessary revisions to Oklahoma's program. Until such
time the Director finds that Oklahoma's proposed subsidence control and
notice rules at OAC 460:20-43-47 and 48 are no less effective than the
currently promulgated regulations at 30 CFR 817.121 and 817.122.
Therefore, the Director approves the proposed rule revisions.
7. OAC 460:20-45-28, Protection of Underground Mining
Oklahoma proposed to revise its underground mining performance
standards at OAC 460:20-45-28 to delete a provision regarding the
protection of underground mining operations from the effects of surface
mining activities. However, Oklahoma still retains in its surface
mining performance standards at OAC 460:20-43-28 an identical
requirement. Therefore, the Oklahoma rules still provide an identical
level of protection to underground mining operations from the adverse
effects of surface mining activities.
There are no Federal underground mining regulations that correspond
to the deleted Oklahoma rule. However, the Federal surface mining
regulation at 30 CFR 816.79 sets forth provisions regarding the
protection of underground mining operations from the effects of surface
mining activities that are substantively identical to the Oklahoma
surface mining requirements at OAC 460:20-43-28. Therefore, the
Director finds that the proposed deletion of the underground mining
protection provision at OAC 460-20-45-28 and retention of an identical
provision at OAC 460:20-43-28 is no less effective than the Federal
regulations at 30 CFR 816.79. The Director approves the proposed rule
revision.
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
The Director notes that the following public and Federal agency
comments were received in response to the [[Page 16050]] September 27,
1994, and December 30, 1994, proposed rule Federal Register notices
that inadvertently identified certain previously approved Oklahoma
rules as being currently proposed revisions to the Oklahoma program.
1. Public Comments
OSM invited public comments on the proposed amendment, but none
were received.
2. Federal Agency Comments
Pursuant to 732.17(h)(11)(i), OSM solicited comments on the
proposed amendment from various Federal agencies with an actual or
potential interest in the Oklahoma program (administrative record No.
OK-963.02).
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers responded on September 30, 1994,
that Oklahoma's proposed revisions were satisfactory (administrative
record No. OK-963.04).
The U.S. Bureau of Mines (BOM) responded on September 27, 1994,
that while Oklahoma's proposed rule to OAC 460:20-27-14(a)(1)(A)
deletes the reference to preparation and certification of the design of
ponds, impoundments, banks, dams and embankments, by a ``professional
geologist, or a qualified, registered, professional land surveyor,''
the proposed rule to OAC 460:20-43-12(b)(3) then adds the statement
that siltation structure construction may be certified by a
``registered professional land surveyor'' (administrative record No.
OK-963.05). BOM further stated that this appears to be a contradiction
in that in one instance, qualified, registered, professional land
surveyors are not allowed to design the ponds, yet they are allowed to
certify that the ponds are constructed correctly. Finally, BOM
commented that this same contradiction occurs in OAC 460:20-45-12 for
underground mining activities.
As discussed in finding No. 4 and OSM's December 18, 1990, final
rule Federal Register notice, Oklahoma's by-laws of the State Board of
Registration for Professional Engineers and Surveyors do not authorize
registered land surveyors in Oklahoma to prepare and/or certify
engineered designs, but they do authorize land surveyors to certify the
construction of siltation structures since certification that a
structure is built according to design does not require the same
qualified expertise as the actual design of the structure (finding No.
2, 55 FR 51902, 51903-4). Accordingly, Oklahoma's rules at OAC 460:20-
27-14(a)(1)(A), 460:20-31-9(a)(1)(A, 460:20-43-12(b)(3), and 460:20-45-
12(b)(3) do not contradict each other.
The U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) responded on October 12,
1994, by commenting that under OAC 460:20-45-12(b)(3), a registered
professional land surveyor is authorized to certify that siltation
structures are constructed as designed, but the authorization for a
registered professional land surveyor to prepare and certify siltation
structure plans designs has been removed elsewhere in Oklahoma's rules
(administrative record No. OK-963.06). BLM then inquired as to whether
OSM intended to retain the certification authorization for registered
professional land surveyors at OAC 460:20-45-12(b)(3). In response to
this comment, the Director refers BLM to the discussion above, which
responds to BOM concerns regarding the same issue.
BLM further commented that it questioned the practicality of the
change under the prime farmland soil removal rule at OAC 460:20-49-
5(a)(1) where Oklahoma proposed to delete language that would have
allowed surface coal mining and reclamation operations on prime
farmland to remove other suitable soil materials which will create a
final soil having productive capacity equal to that which existed prior
to mining.
BLM commented that when soil is removed, stockpiled, and reapplied
there is some loss and mixing due to the limitations of the handling
process itself. When soil is removed and stockpiled there is a
mycorrhyzal degradation within the soil. Further, more significant
mycorrhyzal degradation occurs over time within the stockpile.
Mycorrhyzal degradation lowers soil productivity. BLM also stated that
expecting greater productivity from soil which has undergone such
disturbance is not reasonable and that it would be more productive for
the guidelines to recommend seeding topsoil piles with a temporary
cover grass for the duration of stockpiling. Finally, BLM commented
that such seeding would maintain some of the mycorrhyzal community
within the stockpiled topsoil.
The Director acknowledges BLM's concerns regarding diminished soil
productivity. However, section 515(b)(7)(A) of SMCRA requires, in
pertinent part, that ``[f]or all prime farm lands * * * the operator
shall, as a minimum, be required to * * * segregate the A horizon of
the natural soil, except where it can be shown that other available
soil materials will create a final soil having a greater productivity
capacity * * *'' (emphasis added). Also, the corresponding Federal
regulations at 30 CFR 823.12(c)(1) require, in pertinent part, that
``[s]oil removal and stockpiling operations on prime farmland shall be
conducted to * * * remove other suitable soil materials where such
other soil materials will create a final soil having a greater
productive capacity than that which exist prior to mining'' (emphasis
added). OSM previously approved Oklahoma's rule revision in the
December 18, 1990, final rule Federal Register notice (55 FR 51902,
51903), as being substantively identical to the corresponding
provisions of the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 823.12(c)(1).
Accordingly, Oklahoma's deletion of the aforementioned phrase ``an
equal or'' is no less stringent than section 515(b)(7)(A) of SMCRA and
no less effective than the corresponding Federal regulations at 30 CFR
823.12(c)(1).
In addition, the Director notes that the State and Federal
requirements that a final soil have a greater productive capacity than
that which existed prior to mining applies only to topsoil substitutes,
and not the original topsoil material. Finally, the Director refers BLM
to the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 816.22(c)(2)(iii), which require,
in pertinent part, that ``[s]tockpiled topsoil materials shall be
protected from wind and water erosion through prompt establishment and
maintenance of an effective, quick growing vegetative cover or through
other measures approved by the regulatory authority.'' Oklahoma's
counterpart rule at OAC 460:20-43-7(c)(2)(C) is substantively identical
to 30 CFR 816.22(c)(2)(iii). While OSM cannot dictate that Oklahoma
always require operators to seed topsoil, by virtue of the fact that
nearly all operators in Oklahoma do seed topsoil, BLM's recommendation
for seeding topsoil piles is almost always implemented in Oklahoma.
3. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Concurrence and Comments
Pursuant to 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(ii), OSM is required to solicit
the written concurrence of EPA with respect to those provisions of the
proposed program amendment that relate to air or water quality
standards promulgated under the authority of the Clean Water Act (33
U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) or the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.).
None of the revisions that Oklahoma proposed to make in its
amendment pertain to air or water quality standards. Therefore, OSM did
not request EPA's concurrence.
Pursuant to 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i), OSM solicited comments on the
proposed amendment from EPA (administrative record No. OK-963.02). It
responded on October 13, 1994, that [[Page 16051]] it had no objections
to the approval of Oklahoma's proposed regulations (administrative
record No. OK-963.07).
4. State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and the Advisory Council
on Historic Preservation (ACHP)
Pursuant to 30 CFR 732.17(h)(4), OSM solicited comments on the
proposed amendment from the SHPO and ACHP (administrative record No.
OK-963.02). Neither SHPO nor ACHP responded to OSM's request.
V. Director's Decision
Based on the above findings, the Director approves Oklahoma's
proposed amendment as submitted on September 14, 1994, and as revised
on December 20, 1994.
The Director approves, as discussed in: Finding No. 1, concerning
Oklahoma's proposed recodification of its coal mining rules; finding
No. 2, OAC 460:20-49-5(a)(1), 460:20-49-6, and 460:20-49-7(5),
concerning soil removal, stockpiling, and replacement requirements for
prime farland; finding No. 3, OAC 460:20-27-20(b), 460:20-31-17(b),
460:20-43-53(1), and 460:20-45-53(1), concerning primary road
certification requirements for road systems and transportation
facilities; finding No. 4, OAC 460:20-43-12(b)(3) and 460:20-45-
12(b)(3), concerning certification of construction of siltation
structures by qualified, registered professional engineers and land
surveyors; finding No. 5, OAC 460:20-43-12(f)(8), concerning
sedimentation pond storage volume; finding No. 6, OAC 460:20-43-47 and
-48, concerning subsidence control and public notice; and finding No.
7, OAC 460:20-45-28, concerning protection of underground mining.
The Director approves the rules as proposed by Oklahoma with the
provision that they be fully promulgated in identical form to the rules
submitted to and reviewed by OSM and the public.
The Federal regulations at 30 CFR Part 936, codifying decisions
concerning the Oklahoma program, are being amended to implement this
decision. This final rule is being made effective immediately to
expedite the State program amendment process and to encourage States to
bring their programs into conformity with the Federal standards without
undue delay. Consistency of State and Federal standards is required by
SMCRA.
VI. Procedural Determinations
1. Executive Order 12866
This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12886 (Regulatory Planning and
Review).
2. Executive Order 12778
The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required
by section 2 of Executive Order 12778 (Civil Justice Reform) and has
determined that this rule meets the applicable standards of subsections
(a) and (b) of that section. However, these standards are not
applicable to the actual language of State regulatory programs and
program amendments since each such program is drafted and promulgated
by a specific State, not by OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA
(30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 730.11,
732.15, and 732.17(h)(10), decisions on proposed State regulatory
programs and program amendments submitted by the States must be based
solely on a determination of whether the submittal is consistent with
SMCRA and its implementing Federal regulations and whether the other
requirements of 30 CFR Parts 730, 731, and 732 have been met.
3. National Environmental Policy Act
No environmental impact statement is required for this rule since
section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency
decisions on proposed State regulatory program provisions do not
constitute major Federal actions within the meaning of section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(C)).
4. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).
5. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior has determined that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
The State submittal which is the subject of this rule is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small
entities. Accordingly, this rule will ensure that existing requirements
previously promulgated by OSM will be implemented by the State. In
making the determination as to whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact, the Department relied upon the data and
assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 936
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
Dated: March 25, 1995.
Charles E. Sandberg,
Acting Assistant Director, Western Support Center.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, Title 30, Chapter VII,
Subchapter T of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as set forth
below:
PART 936--OKLAHOMA
1. The authority citation for Part 936 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.
2. Section 936.15 is amended by adding paragraph (p) to read as
follows:
Sec. 936.15 Approval of amendments to the Oklahoma regulatory program.
* * * * *
(p) Recodification of Oklahoma's rules and revisions to the
following provisions of Oklahoma's recodified rules, as submitted to
OSM on September 14, 1994, and as revised on December 20, 1994, are
approved effective March 29, 1995:
OAC 460:20-43-12(b)(3) and 460:20-45-12(b)(3), certification of
construction of siltation structures by qualified, registered
professional engineers and land surveyors;
OAC 460: 20-43-12(f)(8), sedimentation pond storage volume;
OAC 460: 20-43-47 and 48, subsidence control for surface mining
activities;
OAC 460: 20-43-53(1) and 460:20-45-53(1), primary road certification
requirements for road systems and transportation facilities;
OAC 460: 20-45-28, protection of underground mining; and
OAC 460: 20-49-5(a)(1), 460: 20-49-6, and 460:20-49-7(5), soil removal,
soil stockpiling, and soil replacement requirements for prime farmland.
[FR Doc. 95-7697 Filed 3-28-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-M
