96-7707. Denial of Petition for Rulemaking; Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 62 (Friday, March 29, 1996)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 14044-14045]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-7707]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    49 CFR Part 571
    
    
    Denial of Petition for Rulemaking; Federal Motor Vehicle Safety 
    Standards
    
    AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 
    Department of Transportation.
    
    ACTION: Denial of petition for rulemaking.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document denies a petition from the Society of Automotive 
    Engineers (SAE) for rulemaking to incorporate the latest version of SAE 
    Standard J594--Reflex Reflectors, into Federal Motor Vehicle Safety 
    Standard (FMVSS) No. 108. NHTSA's analysis of the petition concludes 
    that there is minimal benefit to the public in updating the reference 
    to this SAE standard. While incorporation would make reflex reflector 
    requirements more readily available to lighting and vehicle design 
    engineers as a current reference, it would require considerable 
    expenditures of agency resources to implement it and all the other SAE 
    standards whose references in FMVSS No. 108 are not the most recent. 
    The agency's commitment of its resources to identify its safety 
    priorities precludes
    
    [[Page 14045]]
    granting this petition. However, the agency will compile a reference 
    document of materials incorporated into Standard No. 108 to improve 
    availability of these materials.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jere Medlin, Office of Crash 
    Avoidance Standards, NHTSA, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 
    20590. Mr. Medlin's telephone number is: (202) 366-5276. His facsimile 
    number is (202) 366-4329.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By letter dated October 4, 1995, William A. 
    McKinney, Chairman of the Lighting Coordinating Committee of the 
    Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc. (Petitioner) petitioned the 
    agency to incorporate the latest version of SAE J594--Reflex 
    Reflectors, into 49 CFR 571.108 (Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 
    No. 108, Lamps, reflective devices and associated equipment). The 
    petitioner claimed the changes in the latest version (J594 JUL95) 
    provide significant improvements in format consistent with the current 
    SAE practice, incorporate information on other SAE publications 
    referenced in the document, include definitions of photometry 
    observation and entrance angles, and provide additional explanations 
    and guidelines for photometry and installation requirements. Petitioner 
    further claimed that these revisions make this new version easier to 
    apply, as well as easier to find because it is located in current SAE 
    Handbooks. Petitioner also claimed that the changes would not adversely 
    affect the costs of any lighting or vehicle manufacturer. No claims 
    about safety or performance were made.
        The agency has reviewed what would be required to implement the 
    Petitioner's desired solution. It has found that the tests and many 
    requirements of the new J594 are from or referenced to SAE Recommended 
    Practice J575 JUN92--Test Methods and Equipment for Lighting Devices 
    and Components for Use on Vehicles Less than 2032 mm in Overall Width. 
    However, the version of J575 to which FMVSS No. 108 refers is J575e 
    August 1970. It is not found in the current SAE Handbook. The same 
    issue occurs for SAE J578, Color Specification. The new SAE J594 refers 
    to the ``current version(s)'', rather than the version required by 
    FMVSS No. 108, which is SAE J578a October 1966.
        Therefore, the advantage claimed by Petitioner by referencing to a 
    standard in current SAE handbooks appears to be very small because this 
    action would update only J594, and none of the subreferenced documents. 
    Additionally, because NHTSA reference to SAE standards is not always 
    absolute, in that parts of standards are referenced or exceptions are 
    made to specific requirements in SAE standards where different or more 
    stringent performance is necessary for safety purposes, the value of 
    having the latest version of an SAE document is lessened. Thus, without 
    a careful reading of FMVSS No. 108, a reader of the newest J594 could 
    continue to be misled as to the pertinent requirements, just as with 
    the currently referenced version.
        An example of this issue is seen in the Installation Requirements 
    paragraph of J594 JUL95. NHTSA is currently proposing in another 
    rulemaking (60 FR 54833) to amend geometric visibility requirements of 
    signal lamps (installed visibility requirements) that are substantially 
    different from those in J594 JUL95. Should this geometric visibility 
    proposal be adopted, the text of any referenced version of J594 will be 
    superseded. It is unlikely that J594 JUL95, or any version of a 
    referenced industry standard would be wholly usable for more than just 
    a short period of time and probably would be out of print after just 
    five years because of SAE's schedule of periodic updating of its 
    standards. At that time, the value of the rulemaking efforts requested 
    by this petition would be negated by another SAE update.
        Allocation of agency resources and agency priorities must be 
    considered in processing what may be the first of many petitions from 
    the SAE to update each of the SAE standards directly referenced in 
    FMVSS No. 108, and potentially more petitions to update the additional 
    SAE standards that are sub-referenced in those SAE standards. All of 
    these mentioned standards have specific dated versions referenced in 
    FMVSS No. 108. Because the SAE endeavors to update its standards on a 
    regular five year schedule, the federal regulatory workload from such a 
    course of updating would be continuous and drain resources from other 
    activities. This is not a desirable course given the agency's shrinking 
    resources. Nonetheless, NHTSA recognizes that the technical expertise 
    found on SAE Committees is invaluable to NHTSA's mission, particularly 
    when performance requirements must be developed to accommodate new 
    technologies. Consequently, NHTSA plans to consider how best to 
    cooperate with the SAE. NHTSA will still be favorably inclined to 
    consider any future SAE request that has significant safety benefits or 
    when such action would remove impediments to the use of new 
    technologies.
        To respond to the need expressed by SAE, the agency will compile 
    and provide on request to interested persons, a document containing the 
    desired SAE and other organizations' standards which are referenced and 
    subreferenced in FMVSS No. 108. The immediate effect is to make it 
    easier for all interested persons, especially lighting and vehicle 
    personnel, to have available in one document all the requirements in 
    the Federal lighting standard. The agency recognizes the problem of 
    finding older SAE Standards, and takes this action to solve that 
    problem. It will be updated as required.
        In accordance with 49 CFR part 552, this completes the agency's 
    review of the petition. The agency has concluded that there is no 
    reasonable possibility that the specific action requested by the 
    petitioner would be issued at the conclusion of a rulemaking 
    proceeding. Accordingly, it denies the SAE's petition.
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30103, 30162; delegation of authority at 49 
    CFR 1.50 and 501.8.
    
        Issued on March 25, 1996.
    Barry Felrice,
    Associate Administrator for Safety Performance Standards.
    [FR Doc. 96-7707 Filed 3-28-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/29/1996
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Denial of petition for rulemaking.
Document Number:
96-7707
Pages:
14044-14045 (2 pages)
PDF File:
96-7707.pdf
CFR: (1)
49 CFR 571