[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 60 (Tuesday, March 30, 1999)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15183-15184]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-7760]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket 72-17]
Portland General Electric Company; Issuance of Environmental
Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Regarding the Proposed
Exemption From Certain Requirements of 10 CFR Part 72
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) is
considering issuance of an exemption, pursuant to 10 CFR 72.7, from the
requirements of 10 CFR 72.82(e) to Portland General Electric Company
(PGE). Exemption from 10 CFR 72.82(e) would release PGE from submitting
the report of preoperational test acceptance criteria and test results
concerning the operation of its independent spent fuel storage
installation (ISFSI). The proposed ISFSI is to be located at the Trojan
Nuclear Plant (Docket Nos. 72-17 and 50-344) in Columbia County,
Oregon. The proposed ISFSI would store the spent nuclear fuel from the
Trojan Nuclear Plant.
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Identification of Proposed Action
By letter dated February 10, 1998, PGE requested an exemption from
the requirement of 10 CFR 72.82(e) to submit a report of the
preoperational test acceptance criteria and test results at least 30
days prior to the receipt of spent fuel or high-level radioactive
waste.
The proposed action before the Commission is whether to grant this
exemption under 10 CFR 72.7 to release PGE from submitting a report to
NRC in accordance with 10 CFR 72.82(e).
Need for the Proposed Action
The applicant is preparing to build and operate the Trojan ISFSI as
described in its application and SAR, subject to approval of the
pending licensing application. The exemption from 10 CFR 72.82(e) is
necessary because PGE is preparing to transfer the spent nuclear fuel
from its current location in the Trojan Nuclear Plant spent fuel pool
to the Trojan ISFSI, immediately following the completion of the
preoperational testing.
[[Page 15184]]
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
Section 72.82(e) currently requires that a Part 72 licensee submit
to NRC a report of preoperational test acceptance criteria and test
results at least 30 days before the receipt of spent fuel into an
ISFSI. As part of the review of the applicant's SAR, the staff
determined that the scope of the preoperational testing was adequately
described. In addition, the staff will be on site during the
preoperational testing to both observe and conduct inspections. This
allows the staff to conduct a direct observation and independent
evaluation as to whether the applicant has developed, implemented, and
evaluated preoperational testing activities. Therefore, the reports
required by 10 CFR 72.82(e) are not necessary to provide a hold period
for NRC staff review. Further, on September 14, 1998, the Commission
issued a proposed rule (63 FR 49046) to eliminate 10 CFR 72.82(e).
Applicants for a license are currently required to submit information
on a preoperational test program as part of an SAR. The Commission's
current practice is to maintain an extensive oversight (i.e.,
inspection) presence during the preoperational testing phase of the
ISFSI; reviewing the acceptance criteria, preoperational test, and test
results as they occur. In the proposed rule, the Commission states that
it believes neither the report nor the 30-day hold period are needed
for regulatory purposes and taking this action will relieve licensees
from an unnecessary regulatory burden. A final rule to remove this
regulation has not yet been issued by the Commission.
Alternative to the Proposed Action
Since there is no environmental impact associated with the proposed
action, any alternatives with equal or greater environmental impact are
not evaluated. The alternative to the proposed action would be to deny
approval of the 10 CFR 72.82(e) exemption and require the report of
preoperational test acceptance criteria and test results at least 30
days before the receipt of spent fuel into the ISFSI. This alternative
would have the same environmental impact.
Agencies and Persons Consulted
On March 1, 1999, Adam Bless from the Oregon Office of Energy was
contacted about this EA for the proposed action and had no concerns.
Finding of No Significant Impact
The environmental impacts of the proposed action have been reviewed
in accordance with the requirements set forth in 10 CFR Part 51. Based
upon the foregoing EA, the Commission finds that the proposed action of
granting an exemption from 10 CFR 72.82(e) will not significantly
impact the quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the
Commission has determined not to prepare an environmental impact
statement for the proposed exemption.
This application was docketed under 10 CFR Part 72, Docket 72-17.
For further details with respect to this action, see the application
for an ISFSI license dated March 26, 1996, and the request for
exemption dated February 10, 1998, which are available for public
inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, 2120 L Street, NW,
Washington, DC 20555, and the Local Public Document Room at the
Portland State University, Branford Price Millar Library, 934 SW
Harrison, Portland, Oregon 97207.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 24th day of March 1999.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
E. William Brach,
Director, Spent Fuel Project Office, Office of Nuclear Material Safety
and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 99-7760 Filed 3-29-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
