[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 62 (Friday, March 31, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16605-16606]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-8014]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[A-570-804]
Sparklers from the People's Republic of China; Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On October 18, 1994, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary results of its administrative
review of the antidumping duty order on sparklers from the People's
Republic of China (PRC) (59 FR 52510). The review was requested for one
manufacturer, Guangxi Native Produce Import and Export Corporation,
Beihai Fireworks and Firecrackers Branch (Guangxi), of the subject
merchandise to the United States and the review period June 1, 1992
through May 31, 1993.
We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on our
preliminary results. We received no [[Page 16606]] comments. The final
results are unchanged from those presented in the preliminary results.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 31, 1995.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Matthew Blaskovich or Zev Primor, Office of Antidumping Compliance,
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-5831/4114.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 18, 1991, the Department published in the Federal Register
the antidumping duty order on sparklers from the PRC (56 FR 27946). On
June 7, 1993, the Department published a notice in the Federal Register
notifying interested parties of the opportunity to request an
administrative review of sparklers from the PRC (58 FR 31941). On June
28, 1993, the petitioners requested, in accordance with 19 CFR
353.22(a), that we conduct an administrative review of exports to the
United States by Guangxi, for the period June 1, 1992, through May 31,
1993. Guangxi had received a separate rate in the final determination
of sales at less than fair value (LTFV). We published a notice of
initiation of the antidumping administrative review on July 21, 1993
(58 FR 39007). On October 18, 1994, the Department published in the
Federal Register the preliminary results of its administrative review
of the antidumping duty order on sparklers from the PRC. The Department
has now completed that review in accordance with section 751 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Review
The products covered by this administrative review are sparklers
from the PRC. Sparklers are fireworks, each comprising a cut-to-length
wire, one end of which is coated with a chemical mix that emits bright
sparks while burning. Sparklers are currently classifiable under
subheading 3604.10.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedules (HTS). The HTS
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes. The
written description remains dispositive as to the scope of this
proceeding. The period of review (POR) was June 1, 1992, through May
31, 1993.
Best Information Available
On February 22, 1994, we mailed Guangxi a questionnaire explaining
the review procedures. The questionnaire, which covered exports to the
United States for the POR, was due on April 14, 1994. We did not
receive a response by the due date and, thus, asked Skypak
International Express (TNT) to trace the mailing and verify Guangxi's
receipt of the document. On May 4, 1994, TNT's delivery office in Hong
Kong confirmed that the questionnaire was accepted by a representative
of Guangxi on March 3, 1994. Because we have received no response and
have not been contacted by Guangxi, we determine that Guangxi is an
uncooperative respondent. Therefore, in accordance with section 776(c)
of the Act, we are using the best information available (BIA) as the
basis for determining a dumping margin for Guangxi's United States
entries during the POR.
In determining what to use as BIA, the Department follows a two-
tiered methodology whereby the Department normally assigns lower
margins to those respondents who cooperate in a review, and margins
based on more adverse assumptions for those respondents who do not
cooperate in a review. This methodology has been upheld by the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (see Allied-Signal Aerospace
Co. v. the United States, Slip Op. 93-1049 (Fed. Cir. June 22, 1993);
see also Krupp Stahl Ag. et. al. v. the United States, Slip Op. 93-84
(CIT May 26, 1993)). Given that Guangxi did not respond to the
Department's questionnaire, we find that Guangxi has not cooperated in
this review.
In accordance with our BIA methodology for uncooperative
respondents, we assign as BIA the higher of: (1) The highest of the
rates found for any firm for the same class or kind of merchandise in
the same country of origin in the LTFV investigation or prior
administrative reviews; or (2) the highest rate found in this review
for any firm for the same class or kind of merchandise in the same
country of origin (see Final Results of Antidumping Administrative
Review: Antifriction Bearings (Other Than Tapered Roller Bearings) and
Parts Thereof From France; et al. (57 FR 28379, June 24, 1992)).
We are using as BIA the highest rate established in the remand of
the LTFV final determination (58 FR 53708, July 29, 1993), which was
93.54 percent.
Final Results of the Review
We invited interested parties to comment on the preliminary
results. We received no comments. The final results are therefore
unchanged from those presented in the preliminary results, and we
determine that a margin of 93.54 percent exists for Guangxi for the
period June 1, 1992, through May 31, 1993.
Furthermore, the following deposit requirements will be effective
upon publication of this notice of final results of administrative
review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of
publication, as provided by section 751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) The cash
deposit rate for Guangxi will be the rate as stated above; (2) for PRC
exporters not covered in this review, a prior review, or the original
LTFV investigation, the cash deposit rate will be the PRC country-wide
rate of 93.54 percent, the rate established in the remand of the LTFV
final determination; and (3) the cash deposit rate for non-PRC
exporters will be the rate established for that firm if a separate rate
has been established for that firm; if a non-PRC exporter does not have
its own separate rate, the deposit rate for that firm's shipments will
be the rate applicable to the PRC supplier of that exporter.
These deposit requirements shall remain in effect until the
publication of the final results of the next administrative review.
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 353.26 to file a certificate regarding the
reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
This administrative review and notice are in accordance with
section 751(a)(1) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(1)) and 19 CFR 353.22.
Dated: March 16, 1995.
Susan G. Esserman,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 95-8014 Filed 3-30-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
