98-5529. Pacific Gas and Electric Co,; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, Environmental Assessment and Finding of no Significant Impact  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 42 (Wednesday, March 4, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 10654-10655]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-5529]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [Docket Nos. 50-275 and 50-323]
    
    
    Pacific Gas and Electric Co,; Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, 
    Unit Nos. 1 and 2, Environmental Assessment and Finding of no 
    Significant Impact
    
        The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is 
    considering issuance of an exemption from certain requirements of its 
    regulations for Facility Operating Licenses Nos. DPR-80 and DPR-82, 
    issued to Pacific Gas and Electric Company (the licensee), for 
    operation of the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant (DCNPP), Unit Nos. 1 
    and 2, located in San Luis Obispo County, California.
    
    Environmental Assessment
    
    Identification of Proposed Action
    
        The proposed action is in response to the licensee's application 
    dated December 8, 1997, for exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 
    50.71(e)(4) regarding submission of revisions to the Final Safety 
    Analysis Report (FSAR) and design change reports for the facility 
    changes made under 10 CFR 50.59 for DCNPP. Under the proposed 
    exemption, the licensee would schedule updates to the single, unified 
    FSAR for DCNPP based on the refueling cycle of Unit 2.
    
    The Need for the Proposed Action
    
        Section 50.71(e)(4) requires licensees to submit updates to their 
    FSAR within 6 months after each refueling outage providing that the 
    interval between successive updates does not exceed 24 months. Since 
    Units 1 and 2 of DCNPP share a common FSAR, the licensee must update 
    the same document within 6 months after a refueling outage for either 
    unit. Allowing the exemption would maintain the FSAR current within 24 
    months of the last revision and still would not exceed a 24-month 
    interval for submission of the 10 CFR 50.59 design change report for 
    either unit.
    
    Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
    
        No changes are being made in the types or amounts of any 
    radiological effluent that may be released off site. There is no 
    significant increase in the allowable individual or cumulative 
    occupational radiation exposure. The Commission concludes that granting 
    the proposed exemption would result in no significant radiological 
    environmental impact.
        With regard to potential non-radiological impacts, the proposed 
    exemption does not affect non-radiological plant effluents and has no 
    other environmental impact. The Commission concludes that there are no 
    significant non-radiological impacts associated with the proposed 
    exemption.
    
    Alternatives to the Proposed Action
    
        As an alternative to the proposed exemption, the staff considered 
    denial of the requested exemption. Denial of the request would result 
    in no change in current environmental impacts. The environmental 
    impacts of the proposed action and the alternative action are similar.
    
    Alternative Use of Resources
    
        This action does not involve the use of any resources not 
    previously considered in the Final Environmental Statements related to 
    the operation of the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 
    2 dated May 1973.
    
    Agencies and Persons Consulted
    
        In accordance with its stated policy, on February 26, 1998, the 
    staff consulted with the California State official, Mr. Steve Hsu of 
    the Radiologic Health Branch of the State Department of Health 
    Services, regarding the environmental impact of the proposed action. 
    The State official had no comments.
    
    Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        Based upon the foregoing environmental assessment, the Commission 
    concludes that the proposed action will not have a significant effect 
    on the quality of the human environment, Accordingly, the Commission 
    has determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the 
    proposed exemption.
        For further details with respect to the proposed action, see the 
    licensee's letter dated December 8, 1997, which is available for public 
    inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, which is located 
    at The Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, D.C., and at 
    the local public document room located at the California Polytechnic 
    State University, Robert E. Kennedy Library, Government Documents and 
    Maps Department, San Luis Obispo, California 93407.
    
    
    [[Page 10655]]
    
    
        Dated at Rockville, Md. this 26th day of February 1998.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Steven D. Bloom,
    Project Manager Project Directorate IV-2, Division of Reactor 
    Projects--III/IV, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 98-5529 Filed 3-3-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/04/1998
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-5529
Pages:
10654-10655 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket Nos. 50-275 and 50-323
PDF File:
98-5529.pdf