99-5294. Warburg Dillon Read LLC; Notice of Application  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 42 (Thursday, March 4, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 10507-10510]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-5294]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    
    [Investment Company Act Release No. 23718; 812-11478]
    
    
    Warburg Dillon Read LLC; Notice of Application
    
    February 25, 1999.
    agency: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'' ''or SEC'').
    
    action: Notice of application for an order under section 12(d)(J) of 
    the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act'') for an exemption from 
    section 12(d)(1) of the Act, under section 6(c) of the Act for an 
    exemption from section 14(a) of the Act, and under section 17(b) of the 
    Act for an exemption from section 17(a) of the Act.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    summary of application: Warburg Dillon Read LLC (``Warburg'') requests 
    an order with respect to the T-REX securities trusts (``T-REX Trusts'') 
    \1\ and future trusts that are substantially similar to T-REX Trusts 
    for which Warburg will serve as a principal underwriter (collectively, 
    the ``Trusts'') that would (i) permit other registered investment 
    companies, and companies excepted from the definition of investment 
    company under section 3(c)(1) or (c)(7) of the Act, to own a greater 
    percentage of the total outstanding voting stock (the ``Securities'') 
    of any Trust than that permitted by section 12(d)(1), (ii) exempt the 
    Trusts from the initial net worth requirements of section 14(a), and 
    (ii) permit the Trusts to purchase U.S. government securities from 
    Warburg at the time of a Trust's initial issuance of Securities.
    
        \1\ ``T-REX'' is a acronym for Trust-Issued Required Equity 
    Exchange Securities.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    filing date: The application was filed on January 22, 1999.
    
    hearing or notification of hearing: An order granting the application 
    will be issued unless the SEC orders a hearing. Interested persons may 
    request a hearing by writing to the SEC's Secretary and serving Warburg 
    with a copy of the request, personally or by mail. Hearing requests 
    should be received by the SEC by 5:30 p.m. on March 22, 1999, and 
    should be accompanied by proof of service on Warburg, in the form of an 
    affidavit, or, for lawyers, a certificate of service. Hearing requests 
    should state the nature of the writer's interest, the reason for the 
    request, and the issues contested. Persons may request notification of 
    a hearing by writing to the SEC's Secretary.
    
    addresses: Secretary, SEC, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549. 
    Applicant, 299 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10171.
    
    for further information contact: Bruce R. MacNeil, Staff Attorney, at 
    (202) 942-0634, or Mary Kay Frech, Branch Chief, at (202) 942-0564 
    (Division of Investment Management, Office of Investment Company 
    Regulation).
    
    supplementary information: The following is a summary of the 
    application. The complete application may be obtained for a fee from 
    the SEC's Public Reference Branch, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 
    20549 (tel. 942-8090).
    
    Applicant's Representations
    
        1. Each Trust will be a limited-life, grantor trust registered 
    under the Act as a non-diversified, closed-end management investment 
    company. Warburg will serve as a principal underwriter (as defined in 
    section 2(a)(29) of the Act) of the Securities issued to the public by 
    each Trust.
        2. Each Trust will, at the time of its issuance of Securities, (i) 
    enter into one or more forward purchase contracts (the ``Contracts'') 
    with a counterparty to purchase a formulaically-determined number of a 
    specified equity security or securities (the ``Shares'') of one 
    specified issuer,\2\ and (ii) in some cases, purchase certain U.S. 
    Treasury securities (``Treasuries''), which may include interest-only 
    or principal-only securities maturing at or prior to the Trust's 
    termination. The Trusts will purchase the Contracts from counterparties 
    that are not affiliated with either the relevant Trust or Warburg. The 
    investment objective of each Trust will be to provide to each holder of 
    Securities (``Holder'') (i) periodic cash distributions from the 
    proceeds of any Treasuries, and (ii) participation in, or limited 
    exposure to, changes in the market value of the underlying Shares.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \2\ Initially, no Trust will hold Contracts relating to the 
    Shares of more than one issuer. However, if certain events specified 
    in the Contracts occur, such as the issuer of Shares spinning-off 
    securities of another issuer to the holders of the Shares, the Trust 
    may receive shares of more than one issuer at the termination of the 
    Contracts.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        3. In all cases, the Shares will trade in the secondary market and 
    the issuer of the Shares will be a reporting company under the 
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The number of Shares, or the value of 
    the Shares, that will be delivered to a Trust pursuant to the Contracts 
    may be fixed (e.g., one Share per Security issued) or may be determined 
    pursuant to a formula, the product of which will vary with the price of 
    the Shares. A formula generally will result in each Holder of 
    Securities receiving fewer Shares as the market value of the Shares 
    increases, and more Shares as their market value decreases.\3\ At the 
    termination of each Trust, each Holder will receive the number of 
    Shares per Security, or the value of the Shares, as determined by the 
    terms of the Contracts, that is equal to the Holder's pro rata interest 
    in the Shares or amount received by the Trust under the Contracts.\4\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \3\ A formula is likely to limit the Holder's participation in 
    any appreciation of the underlying Shares, and it may, in some 
    cases, limit the Holder's exposure to any depreciation in the 
    underlying Shares. It is anticipated that the Holders will receive a 
    yield greater than the ordinary dividend yield on the Shares at the 
    time of the issuance of the Securities, which is intended to 
    compensate Holders for the limit on the Holders' participation in 
    any appreciation of the underlying Shares. In some cases, there may 
    be an upper limit on the value of the Shares that a Holder will 
    ultimately receive.
        \4\ The Contracts may provide for an option on the part of a 
    counterparty to deliver Shares, cash, or a combination of Shares and 
    cash to the Trust at the termination of each Trust.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        4. Securities issued by the Trusts will be listed on a national 
    securities exchange or traded on the Nasdaq National Market System. 
    Thus, the Securities will be ``national market system'' securities 
    subject to public
    
    [[Page 10508]]
    
    price quotation and trade reporting requirements. After the Securities 
    are issued, the trading price of the Securities is expected to vary 
    from time to time based primarily upon the price of the underlying 
    Shares, interest rates, and other factors affecting conditions and 
    prices in the debt and equity markets. Warburg currently intends, but 
    will not be obligated, to make a market in the Securities of each 
    Trust.
        5. Each Trust will be internally managed by three trustees and will 
    not have a separate investment adviser. The trustees will have limited 
    or no power to vary the investments held by each Trust. A bank or banks 
    qualified to serve as a trustee under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, 
    as amended, will act as custodian for each Trust's assets and as 
    administrator, paying agent, registrar, and transfer agent with respect 
    to the Securities of each Trust. Any such bank will have no other 
    affiliation with, and will not be engaged in any other transaction 
    with, any Trust. The day-to-day administration of each Trust will be 
    carried out by Warburg or by the bank.
        6. The Trusts will be structured so that the trustees are not 
    authorized to sell the Contracts or Treasuries under any circumstances 
    or only upon the occurrence of certain events under a Contract. The 
    Trusts will hold the Contracts until maturity or any earlier 
    acceleration, at which time they will be settled according to their 
    terms. However, in the event of the bankruptcy or insolvency of any 
    counterparty to a Contract with a Trust, or the occurrence of certain 
    other events provided for the Contract, the obligations of the 
    counterparty under the Contract may be accelerated and the available 
    proceeds of the Contract will be distributed to the Holders.
        7. The trustees of each Trust will be selected initially by 
    Warburg, together with any other initial Holders, or by the grantors of 
    the Trust. The Holders of each Trust will have the right, upon the 
    declaration in writing or vote or more than two-thirds of the 
    outstanding Securities of the Trust, to remove a trustee. Holders will 
    be entitled to a full vote for each Security held on all matters to be 
    voted on by Holders and will not be able to cumulate their votes in the 
    election of trustees. The investment objectives and policies of each 
    Trust may be changed only with the approval of a ``majority of the 
    Trust's outstanding Securities'' \5\ or any greater number required by 
    the Trust's constituent documents. Unless Holders so request, it is not 
    expected that the Trusts will hold any meetings of Holders, or that 
    Holders will ever vote.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \5\ A ``majority of the Trust's outstanding Securities'' means 
    the lesser of (i) 67% of the Securities represented at a meeting at 
    which more than 50% of the outstanding Securities are represented, 
    and (ii) more than 50% of the outstanding Securities.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        8. The Trusts will not be entitled to any rights with respect to 
    the Shares until any Contracts requiring delivery of the Shares to the 
    Trusts are settled, at which time the Shares will be promptly 
    distributed to Holders. The Holders, therefore, will not be entitled to 
    any rights with respect to the Shares (including voting rights or the 
    right to receive any dividends or other distributions) until receipt by 
    them of the Shares at the time the Trust is liquidated.
        9. Each Trust will be structured so that its organizational and 
    ongoing expenses will not be borne by the Holders, but rather, directly 
    or indirectly, by Warburg, the counterparties, or another third party, 
    as will be described in the prospectus for the relevant Trust. At the 
    time of the original issuance of the Securities of any Trust, there 
    will be paid to each of the administrator, the custodian, and the 
    paying agent, and to each trustee, a one-time amount in respect of such 
    agent's fee over its term. Any expenses of the Trust in excess of this 
    anticipated amount will be paid as incurred by a party other then the 
    Trust itself (which party may be Warburg).
    
    Applicant's Legal Analysis
    
    A. Section 12(d)(1)
    
        1. Section 12(d)(1)(A)(i) of the Act prohibits (i) any registered 
    investment company from owning in the aggregate more than 3% of the 
    total outstanding voting stock of any other investment company, and 
    (ii) any investment company from owning in the aggregate more than 3% 
    of the total outstanding voting stock of any registered investment 
    company. A company that is excepted from the definition of investment 
    company under section 3(c)(1) or (c)(7) of the Act is deemed to be an 
    investment company for purposes of section 12(d)(1)(A)(i) of the Act 
    under sections 3(c)(1) and (c)(7)(D) of the Act. Section 12(d)(1)(C) of 
    the Act similarly prohibits any investment company, other investment 
    companies having the same investment adviser, and companies controlled 
    by such investment companies from owning more than 10% of the total 
    outstanding voting stock of any closed-end investment company.
        2. Section 12(d)(1)(J) of the Act provides that the SEC may exempt 
    persons or transactions from any provision of section 12(d)(1), if, and 
    to the extent that, the exemption is consistent with the public 
    interest and protection of investors.
        3. Warburg states that, in order for the Trusts to be marketed most 
    successfully, and to be traded at a price that most accurately reflects 
    their value, it is necessary for the Securities of each Trust to be 
    offered to large investment companies and investment company complexes. 
    Warburg states that these investors seek to spread the fixed costs of 
    analyzing specific investment opportunities by making sizable 
    investments in those opportunities. Conversely, Warburg asserts that it 
    may not be economically rational for the investors, or their advisers, 
    to take the time to review an investment opportunity if the amount that 
    the investors would ultimately be permitted to purchase is immaterial 
    in light of the total assets of the investment company or investment 
    company complex. Therefore, Warburg argues that these investors should 
    be able to acquire Securities in each Trust in excess of the 
    limitations imposed by section 12(d)(1)(A)(i) and 12(d)(1)(C). Warburg 
    requests that the SEC issue an order under section 12(d)(1)(J) 
    exempting the Trusts from the limitations.
        4. Warburg states that section 12(d)(1) was designed to prevent one 
    investment company from buying control of other investment companies 
    and creating complicated pyramidal structures. Warburg also states that 
    section 12(d)(1) was intended to address the layering of costs to 
    investors.
        5. Warburg asserts that the concerns about pyramiding and undue 
    influence generally do not arise in the case of the Trusts because 
    neither the trustees nor the Holders will have the power to vary the 
    investments held by each Trust or to acquire or dispose of the assets 
    of the Trusts. To the extent that Holders can change the composition of 
    the board of trustees or the fundamental policies of each Trust by 
    vote, Warburg argues that any concerns regarding undue influence will 
    be eliminated by a provision in the charter documents of the Trusts 
    that will require any investment companies owning voting stock of any 
    Trust in excess of the limits imposed by sections 12(d)(1)(A)(i) and 
    12(d)(1)(C) to vote their Securities in proportion to the votes of all 
    other Holders. Warburg also states that the concern about undue 
    influence through a threat to redeem does not case in the case of the 
    Trusts because the Securities will not be redeemable.
        6. Section 12(d)(1) also was designed to address the excessive 
    costs and fees that may result from multiple layers of investment 
    companies. Warburg states
    
    [[Page 10509]]
    
    that these concerns do not arise in the case of the Trusts because of 
    the limited ongoing fees and expenses incurred by the Trusts and 
    because generally these fees and expenses will be borne, directly or 
    indirectly, by Warburg or another third party, not by the Holders. In 
    addition, the Holders will not, as a practical matter, bear the 
    organizational expenses (including underwriting expenses) of the 
    Trusts. Warburg asserts that the organizational expenses effectively 
    will be borne by the counterparties in the form of a discount in the 
    price paid to them for the Contracts, or will be borne directly by 
    Warburg, the counterparties, or other third parties. Thus, a Holder 
    will not pay duplicative charges to purchase securities in any Trust. 
    Finally, there will be no duplication of advisory fees because the 
    Trusts will be internally managed by their trustees.
        7. Warburg asserts that the investment product offered by the 
    Trusts serves a valid business people. The Trusts, unlike most 
    registered investment companies, are not marketed to provide investors 
    with either professional investment asset management or the benefits of 
    investment in a diversified pool of assets. Rather, Warburg asserts 
    that the Securities are intended to provide Holders with an investment 
    having unique payment and risk characteristics, including an 
    anticipated higher current yield than the ordinary dividend yield on 
    the States at the time of the issuance of the Securities.
        8. Warburg believes that the purposes and policies of section 
    12(d)(1) are not implicated by the Trusts and that the requested 
    exemption from section 12(d)(1) is consistent with the public interest 
    and the protection of investors.
    
    B. Section 14(a)
    
        1. Section 14(a) of the Act requires, in pertinent part, that an 
    investment company have a net worth of at least $100,000 before making 
    any public offering of its shares. The purpose of section 14(a) is to 
    ensure that investment companies are adequately capitalized prior to or 
    simultaneously with the sale of their securities to the public. Rule 
    14a-3 exempts from section 14(a) unit investment trusts that meet 
    certain conditions in recognition of the fact that, once the units are 
    sold, a unit investment trust requires much less commitment on the part 
    of the sponsor than does a management investment company. Rule 14a-3 
    provides that a unit investment trust investing in eligible trust 
    securities shall be exempt from the net worth requirement, provided 
    that the trust holds at least $100,000 of eligible trust securities at 
    the commencement of a public offering.
        2. Warburg argues that, while the Trusts are classified as 
    management companies, they have the characteristics of unit investment 
    trusts. Investors in the Trusts, like investors in a unit investment 
    trust, will not be purchasing interests in a managed pool of 
    securities, but rather in a fixed and disclosed portfolio that is held 
    until maturity. Warburg believes that the make-up of each Trust's 
    assets, therefore, will be ``locked-in'' for the life of the portfolio, 
    and there is no need for ongoing commitment on the part of the 
    underwriter.
        3. Warburg states that, in order to ensure that each Trust will 
    become a going concern, the Securities of each Trust will be publicly 
    offered in a firm commitment underwriting, registered under the 
    Securities Act of 1933, resulting in net proceeds to each Trust of at 
    least $10,000,000. Prior to the issuance and delivery of the Securities 
    of each Trust to the underwriters, the underwriters will enter into an 
    underwriting agreement pursuant to which they will agree to purchase 
    the Securities subject to customary conditions to closing. The 
    underwriters will not be entitled to purchase less than all of the 
    Securities of each Trust. Accordingly, Warburg states that either the 
    offering will not be completed at all or each Trust will have a net 
    worth substantially in excess of $100,000 on the date of the issuance 
    of the Securities. Warburg also does not anticipate that the net worth 
    of the Trusts will fall below $100,000 before they are terminated.
        4. Section 6(c) of the Act provides that the SEC may exempt persons 
    or transactions if, and to the extent that, the exemption is necessary 
    or appropriate in the public interest and consistent with the 
    protection of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the policy 
    and provisions of the Act. Warburg requests that the SEC issue an order 
    under section 6(c) exempting the Trusts from the requirements of 
    section 14(a). Warburg believes that the exemption is appropriate in 
    the public interest and consistent with the protection of investors and 
    the policies and provisions of the Act.
    
    C. Section 17(a)
    
        1. Sections 17(a)(1) and (2) of the Act generally prohibit the 
    principal underwriter, or any affiliated person of the principal 
    underwriter, of a registered investment company from selling or 
    purchasing any securities to or from that investment company. The 
    result of these provisions is to preclude the Trusts from purchasing 
    Treasuries from Warburg.
        2. Section 17(b) of the Act provides that the SEC shall exempt a 
    proposed transaction from section 17(a) if evidence establishes that 
    the terms of the proposed transaction are reasonable and fair and do 
    not involve overreaching, and the proposed transaction are reasonable 
    and fair and do not involve overreaching, and the proposed transaction 
    is consistent with the policies of the registered investment company 
    involved and the purposes of the Act. Warburg requests an exemption 
    from sections 17(a)(1) and (2) to permit the Trusts to purchase 
    Treasuries from Warburg.
        3. Warburg states that the policy rationale underlying section 
    17(a) is the concern that an affiliated person of an investment 
    company, by virtue of this relationship, could cause the investment 
    company to purchase securities of poor quality from the affiliated 
    person or to overpay from securities. Warburg argues that it is 
    unlikely that it would be able to exercise any adverse influence over 
    the Trusts with respect to purchases of Treasuries because Treasuries 
    do not vary in quality and are traded in one of the most liquid markets 
    in the world. Treasuries are available through both primary and 
    secondary dealers, making the Treasury market very competitive. In 
    addition, market prices on Treasuries can be confirmed on a number of 
    commercially available information screens. Warburg argues that because 
    it is one of a limited number of primary dealers in Treasuries, it will 
    be able to offer the Trusts prompt execution of their Treasury 
    purchases at very competitive prices.
        4. Warburg states that it only is seeking relief from section 17(a) 
    with respect to the initial purchase of the Treasuries and not with 
    respect to an ongoing course of business. Consequently, investors will 
    know before they purchase a Trust's Securities the Treasuries that will 
    be owned by the Trust and the amount of the cash payments that will be 
    provided periodically by the Treasuries to the Trust and distributed to 
    Holders. Warburg also asserts that whatever risk there is of 
    overpricing the Treasuries will be borne by the counterparties and not 
    by the Holders because the cost of the Treasuries will be calculated 
    into the amount paid on the Contracts. Warburg argues that, for this 
    reason, the counterparties will have a strong incentive to monitor the 
    price paid for the Treasuries, because any overpayment could result in 
    a reduction
    
    [[Page 10510]]
    
    in the amount that they would be paid on the Contracts.
        5. Warburg believes that the terms of the proposed transaction are 
    reasonable and fair and do not involve overreaching on the part of any 
    person, that the proposed transaction is consistent with the policy of 
    each of the Trusts, and that the requested exemption is appropriate in 
    the public interest and consistent with the protection of investors and 
    purposes fairly intended by the policies and provisions of the Act.
    
    Applicant's Conditions
    
        Warburg agrees that the order granting the requested relief will be 
    subject to the following conditions:
        1. Any investment company owning voting stock of any Trust in 
    excess of the limits imposed by section 12(d)(1) of the Act will be 
    required by the Trust's charter documents, or will undertake, to vote 
    its Trust shares in proportion to the vote of all other Holders.
        2. The trustees of each Trust, including a majority of the trustees 
    who are not interested persons of the Trust, (i) will adopt procedures 
    that are reasonably designed to provide that the conditions set forth 
    below have been complied with; (ii) will make and approve such changes 
    as are deemed necessary; and (iii) will determine that the transactions 
    made pursuant to the order were effected in compliance with such 
    procedures.
        3. The Trusts (i) will maintain and preserve in an easily 
    accessible place a written copy of the procedures (and any 
    modifications to the procedures), and (ii) will maintain and preserve 
    for the longer of (a) the life of the Trusts and (b) six years 
    following the purchase of any Treasuries, the first two years in an 
    easily accessible place, a written record of all Treasuries purchased, 
    whether or not from Warburg, setting forth a description of the 
    Treasuries purchased, the identity of the seller, the terms of the 
    purchase, and the information or materials upon which the 
    determinations described below were made.
        4. The Treasuries to be purchased by each Trust will be sufficient 
    to provide payments to Holders of Securities that are consistent with 
    the investment objectives and policies of the Trust as recited in the 
    Trust's registration statement and will be consistent with the 
    interests of the Trust and the Holders of its Securities.
        5. The terms of the transactions will be reasonable and fair to the 
    Holders of the Securities issued by each Trust and will not involve 
    overreaching of the Trust or the Holders of Securities of the Trust on 
    the part of any person concerned.
        6. The fee, spread, or other remuneration to be received by Warburg 
    will be reasonable and fair compared to the fee, spread, or other 
    remuneration received by dealers in connection with comparable 
    transactions at such time, and will comply with section 17(e)(2)(C) of 
    the Act.
        7. Before any Treasuries are purchased by the Trust, the Trust must 
    obtain such available market information as it deems necessary to 
    determine that the price to be paid for, and the terms of, the 
    transaction are at least as favorable as that available from other 
    sources. This will include the Trust obtaining and documenting the 
    competitive indications with respect to the specific proposed 
    transaction from two other independent government securities dealers. 
    Competitive quotation information must include price and settlement 
    terms. These dealers must be those who, in the experience of the 
    Trust's trustees, have demonstrated the consistent ability to provide 
    professional execution of Treasury transactions at competitive market 
    prices. They also must be those who are in a position to quote 
    favorable prices.
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 99-5294 Filed 3-3-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/04/1999
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of application for an order under section 12(d)(J) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act'') for an exemption from section 12(d)(1) of the Act, under section 6(c) of the Act for an exemption from section 14(a) of the Act, and under section 17(b) of the Act for an exemption from section 17(a) of the Act.
Document Number:
99-5294
Dates:
The application was filed on January 22, 1999.
Pages:
10507-10510 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Investment Company Act Release No. 23718, 812-11478
PDF File:
99-5294.pdf