96-5013. Food Labeling: Health Claims and Label Statements; Folate and Neural Tube Defects  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 5, 1996)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 8752-8781]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-5013]
    
    
    
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 44 / Tuesday, March 5, 1996 / Rules 
    and Regulations
    
    [[Page 8752]]
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    
    Food and Drug Administration
    
    21 CFR Part 101
    
    [Docket No. 91N-100H]
    RIN 0910-AA19
    
    
    Food Labeling: Health Claims and Label Statements; Folate and 
    Neural Tube Defects
    
    Agency: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
    
    Action: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is authorizing the use 
    on the labels and in the labeling of food, including dietary 
    supplements, of health claims on the association between adequate 
    intake of folate and the risk of neural tube birth defects. This rule 
    is issued in response to provisions of the Nutrition Labeling and 
    Education Act of 1990 (the 1990 amendments) that bear on health claims. 
    The agency has concluded that, based on the totality of the publicly 
    available scientific evidence, there is significant scientific 
    agreement among qualified experts that, among women of childbearing age 
    in the general U.S. population, maintaining adequate folate intakes, 
    particularly during the periconceptional interval, may reduce the risk 
    of a neural tube birth defect-affected pregnancy.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: April 19, 1996.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeanne I. Rader, Office of Food 
    Labeling (HFS-175), Food and Drug Administration, 200 C St. SW., 
    Washington, DC 20204, 202-205-5375.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Background
    
    A. Procedural History
    
    1. The 1990 Amendments
        The 1990 amendments to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 
    (the act) provided for extensive changes in the way foods are labeled. 
    Under these amendments, FDA can authorize the use, in the labeling of 
    foods, of health claims that characterize the relationship of a 
    nutrient to a disease or a health-related condition. Section 
    403(r)(1)(B) of the act (21 U.S.C. 343(r)(1)(B)) provides that a 
    product is misbranded if it bears a claim that characterizes the 
    relationship of a nutrient to a disease or a health-related condition 
    unless the claim is made in accordance with procedures and standards 
    established under section 403(r)(3) and (r)(5)(D) of the act. The 1990 
    amendments required that FDA evaluate 10 nutrient/disease relationships 
    with respect to their appropriateness as the subjects of health claims. 
    The topic of folic acid and neural tube defects was among those 10 
    topics.
        In the Federal Register of November 27, 1991 (56 FR 60537), in 
    conformity with the requirements of the 1990 amendments, the agency 
    proposed to establish general principles that would govern the 
    appropriateness and validity of health claims on dietary supplements as 
    well as on foods in conventional food form. The agency also proposed to 
    authorize four health claims and to not authorize six others, including 
    a claim on folate and neural tube defects.
    2. The Dietary Supplement Act of 1992 (DS Act)
        In October of 1992, the Dietary Supplement Act (DS Act; Title II of 
    Pub. L. 102-571) was enacted. It imposed a moratorium until December 
    15, 1993, on FDA implementation of the 1990 amendments with respect to 
    dietary supplements. The DS Act directed FDA to issue proposed rules to 
    implement the 1990 amendments with respect to dietary supplements by 
    June 15, 1993, and to issue final rules based on these proposals by 
    December 31, 1993.
        The DS Act also amended the so-called ``hammer'' provision of the 
    1990 amendments to provide that, if the agency did not meet the 
    established December 31, 1993, timeframe for issuance of final rules, 
    the proposed regulations would be considered final regulations.
        Accordingly, when FDA issued its final rules on health claims in 
    the Federal Register of January 6, 1993 (58 FR 2478), they did not 
    cover dietary supplements.
    3. The 1993 Final Rules
        On January 6, 1993, FDA published its final rules on general 
    principles for health claims (58 FR 2478) and the 10 nutrient disease-
    relationships (58 FR 2537 through 2849). The general principles 
    regulation provides that FDA will issue regulations authorizing health 
    claims only when it determines, based on the totality of publicly 
    available scientific evidence (including evidence from well-designed 
    studies conducted in a manner that is consistent with generally 
    recognized scientific procedures and principles) that there is 
    significant agreement, among experts qualified by training or 
    experience to evaluate such claims, that the claim is supported by the 
    scientific evidence.
        On January 6, 1993, the agency also issued regulations announcing 
    its decisions with respect to conventional foods for each of the 10 
    nutrient-disease relationships that the 1990 amendments directed it to 
    consider. The agency authorized claims on all foods, including dietary 
    supplements, on seven nutrient-disease relationships: Calcium and 
    osteoporosis; sodium and hypertension; fat and cancer; saturated fat 
    and cholesterol and coronary heart disease (CHD); fiber-containing 
    grain products, fruits, and vegetables and cancer; fruits, vegetables, 
    and grain products that contain fiber and risk of CHD; and fruits and 
    vegetables and cancer.
        Because of the DS Act, FDA took no final action with respect to the 
    use on dietary supplements of health claims on dietary fiber and 
    cancer; dietary fiber and CHD; omega-3-fatty acids and CHD; zinc and 
    immune function in the elderly; antioxidant vitamins and cancer; and 
    folic acid and neural tube defects.
        With respect to folic acid, the agency explained that, while the 
    Public Health Service (PHS) had recommended that all women of 
    childbearing age in the United States consume 0.4 milligram (mg) of 
    folic acid daily to reduce their risk of having a pregnancy affected 
    with spina bifida or other neural tube defects, PHS had also identified 
    several issues that remained outstanding, including the appropriate 
    level of folic acid in food and safety concerns regarding increased 
    intakes of folic acid. Sections 403(r)(3)(A)(ii), 402(a), and 409 of 
    the act (21 U.S.C. 342(a) and 348) establish that the use of a 
    substance in food must be safe. Questions raised in the PHS 
    recommendation (see 58 FR 2606 at 2609) included the safety of high 
    intakes of folate by the target population as well as by other segments 
    of the population who may unintentionally be exposed to high intakes if 
    overfortification of the food supply with folic acid were to occur as a 
    result of the PHS recommendation. FDA concluded that it could not 
    authorize a health claim on folic acid until the questions regarding 
    the safety of the use of this nutrient, as well as other concerns 
    raised by PHS, were satisfactorily resolved (58 FR 2606 at 2614).
    4. The Dietary Supplement Proposals
        In the Federal Register of June 18, 1993 (58 FR 33700), FDA 
    published a proposal on health claims on dietary supplements. FDA 
    proposed to revise its food labeling regulations to make dietary 
    supplements of vitamins, minerals, herbs, or other similar nutritional 
    substances subject to the same general requirements that apply to 
    
    [[Page 8753]]
    all other types of food with respect to health claims.
        In the Federal Register of October 14, 1993 (58 FR 53296), FDA 
    published a proposal not to authorize health claims on the labels of 
    dietary supplements on five nutrient-disease relationships: Dietary 
    fiber and cancer; dietary fiber and CHD; antioxidant vitamins and 
    cancer; omega-3-fatty acids and CHD; and zinc and immune function in 
    the elderly. However, in the same issue of the Federal Register (58 FR 
    53254), the agency did propose to authorize the use on the labels and 
    labeling of conventional foods and dietary supplements of a health 
    claim on the relationship between folate and risk of neural tube 
    defects and to provide for safe use of folic acid in foods by amending 
    several of its regulations that permit use of folic acid in foods (see 
    also 58 FR 53305 and 58 FR 53312).
    5. The Dietary Supplement Health Claim Final Rule
        In the Federal Register of January 4, 1994 (59 FR 395), FDA 
    announced that it was amending its food labeling regulations to make 
    dietary supplements subject to the same general requirements that apply 
    to all other types of food with respect to the use on the label or in 
    labeling of health claims that characterize the relationship of a 
    substance to a disease or health-related condition.
        Also in the Federal Register of January 4, 1994 (59 FR 433), the 
    agency announced that, in accordance with the 1990 amendments, as 
    amended by the DS Act, the regulation on folate and neural tube defects 
    that it proposed on October 14, 1993 (58 FR 53254), was considered a 
    final regulation for dietary supplements of vitamins, minerals, herbs, 
    and other similar nutritional substances (dietary supplements). In its 
    notice, the agency stated that the document was part of a separate 
    rulemaking contemplated by Congress if a final regulation on the 
    proposal issued on October 14, 1993, was not issued by December 31, 
    1993, and noted that the notice bore a separate docket number (i.e., 
    No. 93N-0481) to distinguish it from the one assigned to the October 
    14, 1993 rulemaking (i.e., No. 91N-100H), which, the agency said, was 
    ongoing.
        In this document, FDA is finalizing its October 14, 1993, proposal 
    to authorize health claims on the relationship between folate and 
    neural tube defects. This final rule pertains to conventional food as 
    well as to dietary supplements. Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal 
    Register, FDA is proposing to revoke the regulation on this nutrient-
    disease relationship that became final by operation of law.
    6. The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994
        The President signed the Dietary Supplement Health and Education 
    Act of 1994 (Pub. L. 103-417) (hereinafter referred to as the DSHEA) 
    into law on October 25, 1994. Among other things, the DSHEA defines 
    ``dietary supplements'' (in section 3(a)).
        In the October 14, 1993, proposal, FDA used the terms ``dietary 
    supplements of vitamins, minerals, herbs, and other nutritional 
    substances'' and ``food in conventional food form.'' Under the changes 
    effected by the DSHEA (see sections 3 (a) and (c) of the DSHEA), the 
    form of a product is no longer determinative of whether the product is 
    a dietary supplement. Accordingly, with the exception noted below, FDA 
    will use the terms ``food'' or ``foods'' in this document to reflect 
    this change and the act's definition of ``dietary supplements.'' FDA 
    will use the terms ``conventional food'' and ``dietary supplement'' in 
    response to comments dealing with the bioavailability of folate, for 
    which a distinction needs to be made between foods and dietary 
    supplements. Where other terminology was used in the regulatory 
    language of the October 14, 1993, proposal, FDA has modified that 
    language to conform to the changes effected by DSHEA.
    
    B. Relationship Between Folate and Neural Tube Defects
    
        The agency reviewed and updated the scientific literature on the 
    relationship between folate and neural tube defects in the Federal 
    Register of November 27, 1991 (56 FR 60610), January 6, 1993 (58 FR 
    2606), and October 14, 1993 (58 FR 53254), and provides only a brief 
    summary here.
        Folate. The term ``folate,'' as used in this document, includes the 
    entire group of folate vitamin forms: That is, folic acid 
    (pteroylglutamic acid), the form of the vitamin added to dietary 
    supplements and to fortified foods, and the naturally- occurring 
    folylpolyglutamates (pteroylpolyglutamates) which are found in foods. 
    ``Folate'' is thus the general term used to include any form of the 
    vitamin, without reference to the state of reduction, degree of 
    substitution, or number of glutamates. As a vitamin, folate functions 
    metabolically in the synthesis of amino acids and nucleic acids. 
    Insufficient quantities of folate in the diet lead to impaired cell 
    multiplication and alterations in protein synthesis (Ref. 1). These 
    effects are most noticeable in rapidly growing or dividing cell 
    populations (Ref. 1). Pregnancy increases the need for folate and many 
    other nutrients because of the need of the mother to maintain adequate 
    nutrition and to meet the nutritional requirements of the developing 
    fetus.
        Neural tube defects. Neural tube defects are serious birth defects 
    that can result in infant mortality or serious disability. The birth 
    defects anencephaly and spina bifida are the most common forms of 
    neural tube defects and account for about 90 percent of these defects. 
    These defects result from failure of closure of the covering of the 
    brain or spinal cord during early embryonic development. The neural 
    tube forms between the 18th and 20th days of pregnancy and closes 
    between the 24th and 27th days. Because the neural tube forms and 
    closes during early pregnancy, the defect may occur before a woman 
    realizes that she is pregnant.
        Each year, about 2,500 cases of neural tube defects occur among 
    about 4 million births in the United States (i.e., in approximately 6 
    of 10,000 births annually). Recent data from State-based birth defects 
    surveillance systems show declining trends for neural tube defects in 
    the United States for about the last 30 years (Ref. 2). The Maternal 
    and Child Health Bureau of the Health Resources and Services 
    Administration reported that the neural tube defect rate in the United 
    States has declined from 1.3 per 1,000 live births in 1970 to 0.6 per 
    1,000 live births in 1989 (Ref. 3).
        The majority of neural tube defects are isolated defects and are 
    believed to be caused by multiple factors. About 90 percent of infants 
    with a neural tube defect are born to women who do not have a family 
    history of these defects. Neural tube defects have been reported to 
    vary with a wide range of factors including genetics, geography, 
    socioeconomic status, maternal birth cohort, month of conception, race, 
    nutrition, and maternal health, including maternal age and reproductive 
    history (Ref. 4). Women with a close relative (i.e., sibling, niece, 
    nephew) with a neural tube defect, with insulin-dependent diabetes 
    mellitus, and with seizure disorders who are being treated with 
    valproic acid or carbamazepine are at significantly increased risk 
    compared with women without these characteristics. Rates for neural 
    tube defects also vary within the United States, with lower rates 
    observed on the west coast than on the east coast.
        Several lines of evidence led to the hypothesis that nutritional 
    factors might be associated with some human neural 
    
    [[Page 8754]]
    tube defects (see 56 FR 60610, 58 FR 2606, and 58 FR 53254). Among the 
    nutrients that were hypothesized to play a role in reducing the risk of 
    neural tube defects, folate, a B vitamin, received the greatest 
    attention because of associations between folate intake and reduced 
    risk of neural tube defects found in observational studies in humans 
    and because of the well- recognized role of folate in cell division and 
    growth. Because the neural tube forms early in embryonic development, 
    interventions aimed at reducing the risk of these defects must occur 
    periconceptionally (i.e., during the interval extending from at least 1 
    month before conception and continuing through the first 6 weeks of 
    pregnancy).
        In the folate health claim proposal (58 FR 53254), FDA tentatively 
    concluded that the available data show that folate alone may reduce the 
    risk of recurrence of neural tube defects when given periconceptionally 
    at high-dose levels (i.e., 4 mg/day) to women at high risk of such a 
    recurrence. Additionally, based on a synthesis of information from 
    several observational studies that reported periconceptional use of 
    multivitamins containing 0 to 1,000 micrograms (mcg or g) of 
    folic acid, FDA inferred that folic acid intake at levels of 0.4 mg 
    (400 mcg) per day may reduce the risk of occurrence of neural tube 
    defects. Protective effects measured by reduction in incidence of 
    neural tube defects have been found in several observational studies 
    that reported periconceptional use of multivitamin supplements 
    containing about 400 mcg folic acid.
        Public health significance. Reduction in adverse pregnancy outcomes 
    such as birth defects is an important public health goal. Because most 
    neural tube defects occur in women without a history of such outcomes, 
    interest in reducing the risk of first occurrences has been very high. 
    PHS has inferred that if all women of childbearing age consumed 0.4 mg 
    (400 mcg) folic acid daily throughout their childbearing years, there 
    might be a reduction in neural tube defects of about 50 percent (i.e., 
    about 1,250 cases per year) (Ref. 5).
    
    C. Regulatory and Other Activities Related to Folate and Neural Tube 
    Defects
    
        Since the passage of the 1990 amendments in November 1990, the 
    rapidly evolving nature of the science relative to folate and the risk 
    of neural tube defects and a number of PHS activities have intertwined 
    with the regulatory process on the question of whether a health claim 
    should be authorized on this topic. These developments have resulted in 
    a dynamic process that began with the publication of a proposed rule 
    not to authorize a health claim on folic acid and neural tube defects 
    (56 FR 60610); saw PHS issue a recommendation that all women of 
    childbearing age in the United States should consume 0.4 mg of folic 
    acid per day for the purpose of reducing their risk of having a 
    pregnancy affected with spina bifida or other neural tube defect (Ref. 
    5); included meetings of FDA's Folic Acid Subcommittee and Food 
    Advisory Committee (Refs. 6 and 7); and was marked by FDA publishing a 
    final rule that noted that, while the PHS recommendation evidenced that 
    significant scientific agreement exists regarding the relationship 
    between folate and neural tube defects, there were significant 
    unresolved questions about the safe use of folic acid in food (58 FR 
    2606). In its January 6, 1993, Federal Register document, the agency 
    concluded that it could not authorize a health claim for folate until 
    the questions regarding the safe use of this nutrient, as well as other 
    concerns raised by PHS, were satisfactorily resolved.
        The process proceeded to the point where, in October 1993, FDA 
    stated that it had tentatively concluded that the safety questions had 
    been resolved, and that there is significant scientific agreement about 
    the validity of the relationship between folate and neural tube defects 
    (58 FR 53254). The agency also tentatively concluded that, based on its 
    discussions with the Folic Acid Subcommittee and its analyses of food 
    intake data, daily folate intakes can be maintained within safe ranges 
    by allocating fortification with folic acid to specific foods in the 
    food supply through an amendment to the food additive regulation for 
    folic acid.
        The agency therefore proposed to authorize a health claim relating 
    diets adequate in folate to a reduced risk of neural tube defect-
    affected pregnancies (58 FR 53254). In companion documents published in 
    the same issue of the Federal Register, the agency also proposed to 
    provide for the safe use of folic acid in foods by amending the food 
    additive regulations for folic acid (58 FR 53312) and to amend the 
    standards of identity for specific enriched cereal-grain products to 
    require the addition of folic acid (58 FR 53305).
        The agency convened the Folic Acid Subcommittee and the Food 
    Advisory Committee on October 14 and 15, 1993 (Ref. 8). Members were 
    asked to comprehensively review the October 14, 1993, proposals and to 
    provide comments. The agency requested that the Folic Acid Subcommittee 
    give priority to the health claim issue because the DS Act required 
    that health claim regulations be finalized by December 31, 1993. The 
    agency treated the discussions of the Folic Acid Subcommittee as 
    comments. A summary of the discussions that occurred during the 
    meetings is provided in the summary of comments below.
        As stated above, in January 1994, FDA announced (59 FR 433) that, 
    by operation of law, the regulation that it proposed on October 14, 
    1993 (58 FR 53254), to authorize the use of a health claim about the 
    relationship between folate and the risk of neural tube defects was a 
    final regulation applicable to the label and labeling of dietary 
    supplements only. The agency also advised that, given the PHS 
    recommendation and the results of the agency's review of the evidence 
    on this claim, in addition to authorizing the claim on dietary 
    supplements, it had no intention of taking action against conventional 
    foods that are naturally high in folate that bear a claim on this 
    nutrient-disease relationship, so long as the claim fully complies with 
    the provisions of the regulation that became final for dietary 
    supplements by operation of law.
    
    D. Scope of This Document
    
        In the Federal Register of October 14, 1993 (58 FR 53254), the 
    agency posed a series of questions for itself. These questions, and the 
    agency's proposed answers, provided the outline for the October 14, 
    1993 document. The questions were: (1) Is a health claim on the 
    relationship between folate and neural tube defects appropriate on food 
    labels? (2) If the agency concludes that a health claim can be safely 
    implemented, what should such a claim say about folate and neural tube 
    defects? (3) Should the food supply be fortified with folic acid to 
    ensure that women have adequate folate intakes? If so, is it necessary 
    to limit the foods to which folic acid can be added and the levels at 
    which it can be added to those foods? (4) If there are to be 
    limitations on the foods that can be fortified with folic acid, which 
    foods are most appropriate for fortification, and at what levels should 
    they be fortified?
        During the development of this final rule, data on the folate 
    status of the U.S. population obtained during Phase 1 of the Third 
    National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III, Phase 1, 
    1988-1991) became available. The agency anticipated evaluating red 
    blood cell (RBC) and serum folate data, and data on folate intake from 
    foods and 
    
    [[Page 8755]]
    dietary supplements from this survey. Additionally, because the NHANES 
    III folate consumption data are more current than the data used by the 
    agency in developing its October 14, 1993, proposals for food 
    fortification and for amending the agency's food additive regulation 
    for folic acid (58 FR 53305 and 58 FR 53312, respectively), the agency 
    considered delaying completion of these rulemakings until evaluation of 
    the newer data was complete.
        However, in late 1993, FDA became aware of a methodological problem 
    associated with the radioassay kits used in NHANES III (1988 to 1994) 
    that affected serum folate and RBC folate values and, consequently, 
    data interpretation. FDA's Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition 
    requested that the Life Sciences Research Office (LSRO), Federation of 
    American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB), review, under a 
    contract with FDA, the issues and report its findings to the agency. 
    FDA requested that LSRO/FASEB: (1) Examine the analytical bases of the 
    discrepancies associated with serum folate and RBC folate values 
    derived from use of certain analytical kits used in NHANES III (1988 to 
    1991); (2) evaluate the scientific basis and validity of procedures 
    proposed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to 
    make corrections to serum folate and RBC folate values obtained in 
    NHANES III Phase 1 (1988 to 1991); (3) reexamine current ``cutoff'' 
    values used for estimation of ``deficient,'' ``low status,'' etc., in 
    light of the need for application of a correction factor; and (4) 
    determine whether these approaches are still useful for estimating the 
    prevalence of inadequate folate nutriture in the U.S. population.
        A full description of the problem, the analytical issues involved, 
    the issues that arose that are related to the interpretation of NHANES 
    III Phase 1 (1988 to 1991) data, and LSRO/FASEB's conclusions are 
    presented in ``Assessment of Folate Methodology Used in the Third 
    National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III, 1988-
    1991)'' (Ref. 9). A major conclusion of LSRO/FASEB was that neither 
    adjustment of the serum folate or RBC folate data from NHANES III Phase 
    1 (1988 to 1991) to correct for the analytical problem, the use of the 
    data without adjustment, nor the use of either data set with adjusted 
    criteria for normalcy and deficiency, by themselves, can predict the 
    prevalence of inadequate folate nutriture of the U.S. population.
        Based on LSRO/FASEB's report and its own review of the data, the 
    agency has concluded that while there is a need for further evaluation 
    of the NHANES III (1988 to 1991) serum folate and RBC folate data set, 
    the agency will not delay this rulemaking until such evaluation is 
    complete.
        The complete data from NHANES III (1988 to 1994) on folate intake 
    from food and dietary supplements are not yet publicly available. 
    Therefore, the agency cannot evaluate total folate intakes from foods 
    and from dietary supplements from this survey data. The agency has 
    concluded that it will also not delay the fortification and food 
    additive rulemakings until the expected availability of these data in 
    1996.
    
    II. Summary of Comments and the Agency's Responses
    
        The agency received nearly 100 comments in response to its October 
    14, 1993, proposed rule on a health claim on folate and neural tube 
    defects. In addition, as stated above, FDA submitted the transcript of 
    the October 14 and 15, 1993, meetings of the Folic Acid Subcommittee 
    and Food Advisory Committee, in which the proposed rule was discussed, 
    to the docket 91N-100H as a comment (Ref. 8). Comments were received 
    from individual members of FDA's Folic Acid Subcommittee and Food 
    Advisory Committee and invited guest consultants; other Federal 
    agencies; a foreign government; State departments of agriculture, 
    consumer services, or health; health care professionals; consumers; 
    consumer advocacy groups; national organizations of health care 
    professionals; State and territorial public health nutrition directors; 
    manufacturers and suppliers of vitamins to the conventional food 
    industry and the dietary supplement industry; manufacturers of finished 
    foods including breakfast cereals, frozen foods, and bakery products; 
    and trade associations of dietary supplement manufacturers, bakers, 
    millers, and food processors. A number of comments were received that 
    were more appropriately answered in other dockets, and these were 
    forwarded to the appropriate dockets for response.
        FDA has considered all of the comments on a health claim on folate 
    and neural tube defects that it received. The agency reviewed all of 
    the documents, including letters, press releases, scientific articles 
    and data supporting these articles, review articles, and 
    recommendations, that were included in the comments. A summary of the 
    comments that the agency received and the agency's responses follow.
    
    A. Advisability of Authorizing Health Claims
    
        1. Some comments endorsed health claims because of their potential 
    educational benefits, while other comments stated that health claims on 
    foods that focus on single nutrients are a bad idea because 
    combinations of foods, not single nutrients, build health. The 
    advisability of health claims was also discussed at the October 14 and 
    15, 1993, meeting of the Folic Acid Subcommittee (Ref. 8).
        The agency notes that the issue of whether health claims should be 
    permitted in food labeling is moot because the 1990 amendments 
    authorized claims on the relationship between substances and diseases 
    or health-related conditions if the scientific validity standard is 
    met.
    
    B. Advisability of Authorizing a Health Claim for Folate and Neural 
    Tube Defects
    
        In Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(A) (21 CFR 101.79(c)(2)(i)(A)), FDA 
    proposed to authorize health claims on labels or in labeling of 
    conventional foods and dietary supplements on the relationship between 
    folate and neural tube defects in women of childbearing age.
    1. Scientific Validity Standard: Adequacy of the Scientific Data
        2. Many comments supported FDA's tentative decision to authorize a 
    health claim on the relationship between folate and neural tube defects 
    but did not provide any specific reasons for their support. Several 
    comments noted that the scientific basis for the claim was as strong as 
    that used to authorize other claims (e.g., those relating calcium and 
    osteoporosis and saturated fat and heart disease). Members of the Folic 
    Acid Subcommittee who supported a health claim noted that such claims 
    would provide information to the target population, and that such 
    claims tend to be more effective than educational programs alone.
        Other comments opposed the health claim, identifying specific 
    concerns with the quality and quantity of the data used to develop the 
    PHS recommendation and to support the proposed health claim. Members of 
    the Folic Acid Subcommittee who opposed a health claim cited the 
    weakness of the data supporting the relationship, including the very 
    small number, and observational nature, of studies relating intake of 
    folate at levels attainable from usual diets to reduced risk of neural 
    tube defects and the many issues associated with the interpretation of 
    these studies (58 FR 53265). 
    
    [[Page 8756]]
    
        Several comments noted that because of the variety of 
    micronutrients in addition to folic acid contained in supplements whose 
    use was reported in several case-control studies, and because foods 
    high in folate are also important sources of other micronutrients, it 
    is not possible to isolate an independent role for folate in reduction 
    in risk of first occurrences of neural tube defects. Other comments 
    also expressed concern regarding the lack of folate-specific data at 
    intakes of 400 mcg daily and noted that studies showing a positive 
    impact of use of multivitamins containing 400 to 1,000 mcg of folic 
    acid may have been showing a combined effect of folic acid and vitamin 
    B12 or of folic acid and other components of the multivitamin 
    preparations.
        A comment noted that there is little knowledge about biological 
    mechanisms that would explain the role of folate in reduction in risk 
    of neural tube defects. The comment stated that it was inappropriate to 
    conclude that, because folic acid alone at a supraphysiologic dose 
    (i.e., 4,000 mcg/day; 4 mg/day) is effective in reducing the risk of 
    neural tube defects among women at recurrent risk, it would also reduce 
    the risk of such defects among women at much lower risk of a first 
    occurrence when consumed at lower doses (i.e., at 400 mcg/day; 0.4 mg/
    day). Another comment expressed the opinion that the agency should not 
    authorize a claim because there is not significant scientific agreement 
    that the evidence supports the claim.
        Section 101.14(c) (21 CFR 101.14(c)) states that the agency will 
    issue a regulation authorizing a health claim when it determines, based 
    on the totality of the publicly available scientific evidence, that 
    there is significant scientific agreement, among experts qualified by 
    scientific training and experience to evaluate such claims, that the 
    claim is supported by such evidence.
        For folate and neural tube defects, the agency evaluated all of the 
    available scientific evidence, consulted with the Folic Acid 
    Subcommittee and Food Advisory Committee about this evidence, and 
    considered all the information contained in the comments. Based on this 
    review, FDA has concluded that there is significant scientific 
    agreement that the data associating folate intake and reduced risk of 
    neural tube defects support a health claim on this relationship.
        The strongest evidence for this relationship comes from the 
    randomized controlled Medical Research Council intervention study (Ref. 
    14) that showed that women at risk of a recurrence of a neural tube 
    defect-affected pregnancy who consumed a supplement containing 4 mg 
    (4,000 mcg; 10 times the reference daily intake (RDI) folic acid daily 
    throughout the periconceptional period had a significantly reduced risk 
    of having another child with a neural tube defect. This study 
    demonstrated, for the first time, that there was a significant 
    reduction in recurrence of neural tube defects with high levels of 
    folic acid but not with other vitamins and minerals. This study 
    identified a specific role for folic acid in reducing the risk of 
    recurrence of neural tube defect-affected pregnancies in women with a 
    history of this defect and thus established the scientific basis for a 
    relationship between folate intake and the occurrence of neural tube 
    defects.
        In addition, protective effects against occurrence of neural tube 
    defects were found in a Hungarian randomized controlled trial that used 
    a multivitamin/multimineral preparation containing 0.8 mg folic acid 
    daily (Ref. 15). Four of five observational studies have also reported 
    a reduced risk of neural tube defects among women who reported 
    consuming 0.4 to 1.0 mg folate daily from multivitamin supplements 
    (Refs. 10, 11, 13, and 16). Several of these studies (Refs. 11, 13, and 
    16) have also reported beneficial effects against occurrence of neural 
    tube defects of dietary folate intakes of 100 to 250 mcg or more daily.
        Based on its review of all of these studies, the agency has 
    concluded that their results are consistent with the conclusion that 
    folate, at levels attainable from usual diets, may reduce the risk of 
    occurrence of neural tube defects.
        The agency agrees that there are still significant gaps in our 
    knowledge about the etiology of neural tube defects; about how folate, 
    either alone or in combination with other nutrients, reduces the risk 
    of neural tube defects; about dose-response relationships between 
    folate intake and reduction in risk of neural tube defect-affected 
    pregnancies; and about the role of other essential nutrients in the 
    etiology of neural tube defects. However, the randomized controlled 
    Medical Research Council trial (Ref. 14) clearly established the 
    specific effectiveness of increased folate intake in reducing the risk 
    of recurrence of some neural tube defects, and the findings of most of 
    the studies cited above (Refs. 9, 10, 11, 13, and 16) are consistent 
    with the conclusions drawn from the results of the Medical Research 
    Council trial.
        Because of the consistency between the results of the Medical 
    Research Council trial and the results of the smaller observational 
    studies, PHS has inferred that folate alone, at levels attainable in 
    usual diets, may reduce the risk of neural tube defects (Ref. 5). FDA 
    participated in the development of the PHS recommendation and noted in 
    the folate health claim proposal (58 FR 53266) that the recommendation 
    evidenced that significant scientific agreement exists regarding the 
    validity of an association between folate intake and risk of neural 
    tube defects.
        FDA has therefore concluded, based on its own review of the 
    scientific literature, that there is significant scientific agreement 
    regarding the validity of the relationship, and that the statutory 
    requirements for authorizing a health claim in this topic area have 
    thus been met. Therefore, the agency is adopting 
    Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(A) as proposed.
    2. Appropriateness of Providing for a Claim
        In addition to comments addressing the scientific validity of a 
    health claim on folate and neural tube defects, the agency received 
    comments questioning the advisability of authorizing a claim on this 
    topic.
        a. General comments.
        3. Some comments stated that it was advisable to provide for a 
    folate/neural tube defects health claim because such a claim can serve 
    to broaden public knowledge of the relationship between folate and 
    neural tube defects. A comment noted that the folate/neural tube defect 
    claim might be especially beneficial for women who had previously had a 
    child with a neural tube defect. One comment suggested that a health 
    claim for folate and neural tube defects would increase intake of 
    folate by women of childbearing age.
        Others expressed concern by noting that consumers will find it 
    difficult to understand the claim and will begin to associate folate-
    containing foods with an effect on birth defects in general. A comment 
    noted that, given that many occurrences of neural tube defects will not 
    be affected by folate intake, the claim will give a false hope of 
    avoidance of the defect. A comment expressed concern that publication 
    of the claim might cause unnecessary alarm among women who are 
    pregnant. Other comments noted that neural tube defects are not the 
    result of folate deficiency per se or noted the lack of evidence that 
    there is a need in the general U.S. population for an increase in 
    folate intake. Another comment, in considering the agency's proposed 
    model health claims, noted that FDA 
    
    [[Page 8757]]
    was trying to make the food label do more than it can.
        Another comment emphasized that the context in which data from the 
    major controlled intervention trial of effects of folic acid at levels 
    approaching those obtainable from diets (i.e., the Hungarian trial; 
    Ref. 15) were obtained (e.g., women who volunteered for the trial gave 
    up drinking and smoking, consumed healthful diets before pregnancy, and 
    in general pursued good health practices in the periconceptional 
    interval) is not the same context in which women in the general 
    population will receive folate.
        The agency agrees with the comments above that a health claim for 
    folate and neural tube defects may have an educational benefit and has 
    the potential for increasing folate intake among women in the target 
    population by informing them of the importance of folate intake during 
    their childbearing years. The agency also recognizes the importance of 
    informing women of childbearing age of the need to ensure that their 
    diets include adequate folate throughout this time of their lives and 
    notes that providing information at the point of purchase of food by 
    means of health claims and nutrient content claims can be an effective 
    means of getting the information to consumers and of helping consumers 
    to maintain healthful diets. Given that about half of all pregnancies 
    are unplanned, many women in the general population can benefit from 
    the information provided in the health claim because it will motivate 
    them to increase their folate intake, even if they are not anticipating 
    a pregnancy in the near future.
        The agency recognizes that women in the Hungarian trial (Ref. 15) 
    were advised to adopt specific health conscious practices before 
    attempting to become pregnant, and that women in the general population 
    may not adopt such practices before becoming pregnant. The agency 
    notes, however, that there are no data to indicate that the outcome of 
    the Hungarian trial was related to or dependent upon the adoption of 
    those practices, and that all women in the trial were urged to adopt 
    those practices, not only those receiving folate-containing 
    supplements. The agency finds no basis to deny the claim based on such 
    a consideration. In addition, although emphasis is frequently placed 
    upon estimates that about half of all pregnancies in the United States 
    are unplanned, the agency notes that the large numbers of women who do 
    plan their pregnancies (i.e., about 50 percent) may be adopting health-
    conscious practices before conception and thus may receive folate in a 
    context similar to that employed in the Hungarian trial.
        The agency recognizes that there is the potential for the health 
    claim to be misleading and has addressed that potential by requiring 
    that all claims contain specific information that informs women about 
    the effect that adequate intake of folate during their childbearing 
    years may have on their risk of a specific type of birth defect, 
    without implying that adequate folate intake will provide 100 percent 
    protection against that, or any other, birth defect. The agency 
    recognizes that many nutrients, as well as attention to overall diet 
    and healthful lifestyles, are important for obtaining the best possible 
    outcome of pregnancy and has incorporated these concepts into the 
    language of the health claim.
        Specifically, in this health claim regulation, the agency 
    identifies the target population for the claim as women during their 
    childbearing years (Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(A)); describes the effect of 
    folate intake on the risk of neural tube defects, a very specific type 
    of birth defect (Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(C)); requires that claims not 
    imply that folate intake is the only recognized risk factor for neural 
    tube defects (Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(D)); summarizes the significance of 
    appropriate folate intake relative to reduction in risk of neural tube 
    defects in the total dietary context by requiring that claims state 
    that healthful diets are also needed (Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(H)); and 
    provides for optional (voluntary) identification of a variety of 
    sources of folate in the claim (Sec. 101.79(c)(3)(vii)). In describing 
    the requirements for foods to bear the claim, the agency has defined 
    characteristics that will qualify a food for bearing the folate/neural 
    tube defect health claim with an eye to ensuring that such foods will 
    be good sources of folate (Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(ii)(A)).
        Provision of such information will assist women in understanding 
    the relationship of folate intake to the risk of neural tube defects 
    and the significance of the information in the context of the total 
    daily diet. Thus, the claim includes facts essential for consumer 
    understanding of the conditions and circumstances under which the 
    claimed effect is more likely to be obtained.
        b. Small size of the population at risk.
        4. Some comments disagreed with the agency's proposal to authorize 
    a health claim for folate and neural tube defects because other 
    authorized claims are different from this one. They pointed out that 
    the folate claim deals with a problem that affects a very small number 
    of people, while other authorized claims deal with reducing the risk of 
    long-developing conditions affecting very large segments of the 
    population (e.g., calcium and osteoporosis; fat and heart disease). 
    Another comment noted that there have been large unexplained declines 
    in neural tube defects in the United States since the 1930's. Another 
    comment noted that neural tube defects constitute only a small fraction 
    of all birth defects and stated that the proposed claim could lead to a 
    false sense of security regarding protection from risk of all birth 
    defects. Another comment noted that despite their distressful nature, 
    because neural tube defect-affected births are a relatively rare 
    phenomena, they should be attacked at a medical level.
        The agency disagrees with comments that it should not authorize a 
    folate/neural tube defect health claim on the basis that the affected 
    population is small in number. The eligibility requirements for a 
    health claim do not limit such claims solely to disease or health-
    related conditions affecting significant portions of the population. 
    Rather, the general eligibility requirements for health claims require 
    that for a substance to be eligible for a health claim, the substance 
    must be associated with a disease or health-related condition for which 
    the general population or an identified U.S. population subgroup (e.g., 
    the elderly) is at risk (see Sec. 101.14(b)(1)).
        As FDA explained in the final rule establishing Sec. 101.14(b)(1) 
    (58 FR 2478 at 2499), the agency will interpret this provision flexibly 
    and will disqualify few claims under it. However, the agency also 
    advised that if the affected population is small in size or is not 
    readily identifiable, information on prevalence in the U.S. population 
    will be a material fact that must be disclosed to avoid misbranding the 
    product.
        FDA agrees that the prevalence of pregnancies affected by neural 
    tube defects in the United States is low. However, because it is not 
    currently possible to predict when a pregnancy will be affected, the 
    U.S. subpopulation potentially at risk is large (i.e., women capable of 
    becoming pregnant). The agency, consequently, disagrees that this 
    health claim should not be authorized because a large subpopulation is 
    potentially at risk of a neural tube defect-affected pregnancy.
        c. Potential impact of new data.
        5. Several comments expressed concern that results of research in 
    progress on the potential role of factors other than folate could lead 
    to revisions of the current PHS recommendation that all women consume 
    0.4 mg of folate daily throughout their childbearing 
    
    [[Page 8758]]
    years to reduce their risk of neural tube birth defects. A comment 
    noted that, based on testimony presented at the April 15 and 16, 1993, 
    meeting of the Folic Acid Subcommittee, data from ongoing studies in 
    South Carolina and Texas will be available soon and should provide 
    information on the effectiveness of folate-containing supplement 
    intervention programs in these areas. Another comment noted that data 
    reported at the recent meeting of the American Public Health 
    Association suggested that while reported intake of folate-containing 
    supplements appeared to be associated with a reduced incidence of 
    neural tube defect-affected pregnancies overall, the association was 
    not statistically significant for Hispanic women who have a higher risk 
    for neural tube defects than many other women.
        Some members of the Folic Acid Subcommittee questioned whether new 
    data on vitamin B12 (summarized in section II.E.6. of this 
    document) should influence the agency's position on the relationship 
    between folate and neural tube defects. Another Folic Acid Subcommittee 
    member stated that regardless of the new findings, the agency should 
    move ahead with the folate/neural tube defect health claim.
        The agency is aware that data from several ongoing studies have 
    been discussed at national meetings, but until these data and detailed 
    descriptions of study designs, methodologies, and full results are 
    publicly available, the agency cannot act on them. New data that have 
    become publicly available during this rulemaking are reviewed in 
    Section II.E.6 of this document. The agency notes, however, that the 
    validity of the relationship between folate and neural tube defects has 
    been established by the Medical Research Council trial (Ref. 14). New 
    findings are not likely to detract from the validity of that 
    relationship.
    
    C. Issues Regarding the Substance/Disease Relationship That Is the 
    Basis of the Claim
    
    1. Identifying the Substance (Folic Acid Versus Folate)
        In developing its proposed regulation, the agency considered how 
    best to describe the relationship between folate and neural tube 
    defects. In the proposed statement of the substance/disease 
    relationship (Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(A)), FDA described the substance 
    that is the subject of the claim as ``folate.'' FDA also used this term 
    in proposed Sec. 101.79(a)(2), (b)(1), (b)(3), (c)(2)(i)(B), 
    (c)(2)(i)(F), (c)(2)(ii)(A), (c)(2)(ii)(B), (c)(2)(iv), (c)(3)(ii), and 
    (d). The agency's use of this term differed from the wording of the 
    1990 amendments which required that FDA evaluate the relationship 
    between ``folic acid'' and neural tube defects.
        Based on its review of the available studies, the agency in its 
    October 14, 1993, proposed rule (58 FR 53254 at 53280) described its 
    rationale for broadening the topic by noting that the term ``folates'' 
    is used broadly to represent the entire group of nutritionally active 
    folate vitamin forms and includes both synthetic folic acid and the 
    folylpolyglutamates that occur naturally in foods.
        In reviewing the scientific evidence on the relationship between 
    folate and neural tube defects, the agency noted that some studies 
    reported effects of use of supplements of folic acid in combination 
    with intakes of food folates (Ref. 10), while other studies reported 
    effects of dietary intakes of food folates alone (Refs. 11, 13, and 
    16). Based on its review of these studies, the agency tentatively 
    concluded that the diet/disease relationship is more accurately 
    described as being related to all of the biologically active vitamin 
    forms of folate rather than just to the synthetic form of the vitamin 
    (i.e., folic acid). Thus, in its review of the substance/disease 
    relationship, FDA considered the effect of all of the nutritionally 
    active forms of this vitamin (i.e., folates) on neural tube defects and 
    not just the effect of the form of the vitamin specified in the 1990 
    amendments (i.e., folic acid). Use of the term ``folate'' in proposed 
    Sec. 101.79(a)(2), (b)(1), (b)(3), (c)(2)(i)(B), (c)(2)(i)(F), 
    (c)(2)(ii)(A), (c)(2)(ii)(B), (c)(2)(iv), (c)(3)(ii), and (d) was 
    consistent with the scope of the agency's review.
        6. A comment stated that FDA had unjustifiably changed the 
    demonstrated efficacious form of the vitamin from ``folic acid'' to 
    ``dietary folate,'' and that because dietary food folate has not been 
    demonstrated to reduce the incidence of neural tube defects, such a 
    change is not justified. Several comments stated that FDA, in its 
    health claims proceedings, had departed from the PHS recommendation, 
    which uses the term ``folic acid'' in its title and in describing 
    dietary change associated with reduced risk of neural tube defects, and 
    that FDA, instead, concentrated inappropriately on food folate.
        FDA does not agree with these comments and concludes that it was 
    justified in expressing the food substance/disease relationship as 
    ``folate and neural tube defects'' rather than as ``folic acid and 
    neural tube defects.'' FDA also disagrees with the comments that folic 
    acid is the only substance that was appropriately the subject of FDA's 
    review, and that dietary food folate has not been demonstrated to 
    reduce the incidence of neural tube defects.
        a. Efficacy of food folate. In reviewing the scientific evidence on 
    the relationship between folate and neural tube defects, the agency 
    noted that one study attributed all observed effects to consumption of 
    dietary supplements of undefined composition without quantifying 
    contribution of folate either from the supplements or from food (Ref. 
    10), while other studies attempted to specifically quantify intakes of 
    folate from food as well as from dietary supplements (Refs. 11, 13, and 
    16).
        Some studies reported protective effects of use of supplements 
    containing folic acid in combination with intakes of food folates 
    (Refs. 11, 13, and 16), while other studies reported protective effects 
    from dietary improvement in general (Ref. 17) or from intakes of food 
    folates alone (i.e., without supplement use) (Refs. 11 and 13).
        Milunsky et al. (Ref. 11), Bower and Stanley (Ref. 16), and Werler 
    et al. (Ref. 13) presented data on the relationship of dietary folate 
    to risk of neural tube defects among nonusers of dietary supplements. 
    Each of these studies found reduced risk of neural tube defects 
    associated with increasing dietary intake of food folate. In the 
    prospective study of Milunsky et al. (Ref. 11), the relative risk of 
    neural tube defects was 0.42 for those women ingesting more than 100 
    mcg folate per day compared with those ingesting less than 100 mcg 
    folate per day. Bower and Stanley (Ref. 16), in a study in Western 
    Australia, found reduced risk of neural tube defects among women 
    consuming more than 240 mcg food folate per day versus community 
    controls. Werler et al. (Ref. 13) reported a significant trend of 
    reduced occurrence of neural tube defects with increasing dietary food 
    folate.
        Laurence et al. (Ref. 17) performed a trial of dietary education 
    without prescribing supplements and found that improvement in women's 
    diets from ``poor'' to ``good'' led to a 50 percent reduction in 
    recurrence of neural tube defects in women at high risk of this 
    complication. Dietary improvement is assumed to increase intake of 
    folate and many other nutrients by unspecified amounts. Specifically, 
    these authors reported no cases of neural tube defects among women who 
    were judged to have eaten ``good'' or ``fair'' diets (Ref. 17). All 
    recurrences occurred among the 30 of 186 women who were judged to have 
    eaten ``poor'' diets. ``Poor'' diets were defined as those considered 
    to be deficient in first-class protein, usually no fruits and 
    vegetables, and generally 
    
    [[Page 8759]]
    with excessive amounts of carbohydrates. ``Good'' diets were defined as 
    those providing good intakes of all essential foods, including protein, 
    and with no excessive amounts of refined carbohydrates, sweets, and 
    soft drinks (see 58 FR 53253, October 14, 1993).
        The studies of Milunsky et al. (Ref. 11), Bower and Stanley (Ref. 
    16), Werler et al. (Ref. 13), and Laurence et al. (Ref. 17) have all 
    demonstrated that food folates provide protective effects against risk 
    of neural tube defects.
        b. Interchangeability of the terms ``folate'' and ``folic acid'' in 
    common usage and in nutrition labeling. FDA notes that, in common 
    usage, the terms ``folic acid'' and ``folate'' are frequently used 
    interchangeably to describe the biologically active forms of the 
    vitamin. Folates are ubiquitous in nature, being present in nearly all 
    natural foods (Ref. 18), and occurring in a wide range of forms (Ref. 
    19). Human nutritional requirements for folate can be met by a variety 
    of naturally occurring forms of the vitamin from many sources as well 
    as by pteroylglutamic acid, the form of the vitamin added as a 
    fortificant to breakfast cereals and other foods, and the form present 
    in dietary supplements.
        In nutrition labeling, ``folic acid,'' ``folate,'' and ``folacin'' 
    are allowable synonyms (Sec. 101.9(c)(8)(iv) and (c)(7)(iv)). All of 
    these terms provide a way to describe the nutritional value of folate 
    vitamin forms, although the term ``folacin'' is now rarely used.
        c. Interchangeability of the terms ``folate'' and ``folic acid'' in 
    the PHS recommendation. FDA disagrees that the PHS statement emphasizes 
    synthetic folic acid, the form of the vitamin used as a fortificant in 
    conventional foods and in dietary supplements. In point of fact, the 
    PHS statement, consistent with lay information and with nutrition 
    labeling regulations, uses the terms ``folic acid'' and ``folate'' 
    interchangeably (Ref. 5). For example, the PHS recommendation states 
    that ``folate intake  0.4 mg/day can be obtained from the 
    diet through careful selection of foods,'' that improvement in dietary 
    habits is one potential approach ``for the delivery of folic acid to 
    the general population in the dosage recommended,'' and that ``women 
    should be careful to keep their total daily folate consumption at < 1="" mg="" per="" day''="" (ref.="" 5).="" that="" some="" ambiguity="" with="" respect="" to="" use="" of="" the="" terms="" ``folic="" acid''="" and="" ``folate''="" was="" present="" in="" the="" phs="" recommendation="" was="" recognized="" during="" finalization="" of="" the="" recommendation="" at="" a="" cdc-sponsored="" meeting="" held="" in="" atlanta="" on="" july="" 27,="" 1992.="" at="" that="" meeting,="" cdc="" staff="" noted="" that="" the="" ambiguity="" was="" deliberate="" (ref.="" 20):="" invited="" speaker="" wald:="" there="" is="" an="" ambiguity="" here="" over="" whether="" it's="" total="" or="" extra,="" unless="" you="" have="" a="" particularly="" kind="" of="" astute="" legal="" perspective="" on="" this.="" *="" *="" *="" i="" have="" a="" question,="" though.="" was="" the="" ambiguity="" deliberate?="" cdc's="" erickson:="" yes.="" invited="" speaker="" wald:="" you="" see,="" i="" think="" i="" would="" have="" probably="" inserted="" the="" same="" ambiguity="" myself.="" because="" the="" intention="" is="" to="" get="" something="" going.="" *="" *="" *="" and="" one="" has="" the="" 0.4="" mg="" figure="" from="" the="" previous="" rda="" *="" *="" *="" at="" least="" that="" is="" a="" psychological="" fixing="" point.="" thus,="" there="" was="" some="" ambiguity="" in="" the="" phs="" recommendation="" from="" the="" time="" of="" its="" development,="" and="" the="" recommendation="" does="" not="" identify="" synthetic="" folic="" acid="" as="" the="" sole="" active="" form="" of="" the="" vitamin.="" d.="" conclusion.="" based="" on="" its="" review="" of="" the="" available="" studies,="" the="" agency="" tentatively="" concluded="" in="" the="" proposed="" rule="" that="" the="" food="" substance/disease="" relationship="" is="" most="" accurately="" expressed="" as="" ``folate="" and="" neural="" tube="" defects''="" rather="" than="" as="" ``folic="" acid="" and="" neural="" tube="" defects''="" because="" the="" term="" ``folate''="" encompasses="" all="" forms="" of="" the="" vitamin="" from="" any="" source.="" in="" addition,="" at="" intakes="" attainable="" from="" usual="" diets,="" both="" folate="" from="" foods="" and="" folic="" acid="" from="" fortified="" foods="" or="" dietary="" supplements="" are="" converted="" into="" the="" same="" functional,="" metabolically="" active,="" reduced="" coenzyme="" vitamin="" forms="" in="" the="" body="" (ref.="" 19).="" thus,="" nutritional="" requirements="" are="" met="" by="" a="" variety="" of="" forms="" of="" folate,="" and,="" with="" respect="" to="" reduction="" in="" risk="" of="" neural="" tube="" defects,="" the="" utility="" of="" increased="" folate="" intake,="" whether="" achieved="" through="" improved="" food="" choices="" or="" through="" use="" of="" dietary="" supplements,="" has="" been="" shown.="" the="" comments="" summarized="" above="" do="" not="" provide="" a="" basis="" for="" the="" agency="" to="" change="" the="" relationship="" statement="" because="" they="" are="" inconsistent="" with="" the="" scientific="" data,="" and="" they="" do="" not="" provide="" data="" that="" demonstrate="" that="" ``folic="" acid''="" performs="" nutritional="" functions="" different="" from="" those="" performed="" by="" naturally="" occurring="" food="" folates.="" thus,="" making="" a="" distinction="" between="" ``folate''="" and="" ``folic="" acid''="" when="" all="" forms="" of="" the="" vitamin="" are="" capable="" of="" conversion="" to="" active="" vitamin="" coenzymes="" and="" metabolic="" function="" is="" artificial="" and="" inappropriate.="" therefore,="" in="" sec.="" 101.79,="" fda="" is="" authorizing="" a="" health="" claim="" on="" labels="" and="" in="" labeling="" of="" conventional="" foods="" and="" dietary="" supplements="" about="" the="" relationship="" between="" folate="" and="" neural="" tube="" defects="" in="" women="" of="" childbearing="" age.="" the="" agency="" is="" retaining="" this="" terminology="" throughout="" the="" codified="" language.="" however,="" sec.="" 101.79(c)(2)(i)(b)="" states="" that="" any="" one="" of="" several="" synonyms="" may="" be="" used,="" including="" ``folic="" acid''="" and="" ``folate,''="" when="" specifying="" the="" nutrient="" in="" a="" health="" claim.="" fda="" notes="" that="" in="" proposed="" sec.="" 101.79(c)(2)(i)(f),="" the="" term="" ``folic="" acid''="" was="" used="" instead="" of="" the="" intended="" term="" ``folate,''="" which="" was="" otherwise="" consistently="" used="" throughout="" the="" proposed="" codified="" language.="" fda="" is="" correcting="" this="" terminology="" in="" the="" final="" codified="" language,="" which="" for="" other="" reasons="" described="" in="" this="" preamble="" is="" redesignated="" as="" sec.="" 101.79(c)(2)(i)(e).="" 2.="" issues="" of="" source="" and="" amount="" in="" sec.="" 101.79(c)(2)(i)(h),="" the="" agency="" proposed="" to="" prohibit="" statements="" in="" the="" health="" claim="" that="" a="" specified="" amount="" of="" folate="" (e.g.,="" 400="" mcg="" (100="" percent="" of="" the="" daily="" value="" (dv))="" in="" a="" dietary="" supplement)="" is="" more="" effective="" in="" reducing="" the="" risk="" of="" neural="" tube="" defects="" than="" a="" lower="" amount="" (e.g.,="" 100="" mcg="" (25="" percent="" of="" the="" dv)="" in="" a="" breakfast="" cereal="" or="" from="" diets="" rich="" in="" fruits="" and="" vegetables).="" the="" agency="" proposed="" this="" limitation="" because="" it="" is="" consistent="" with="" scientific="" data="" showing="" that="" reduced="" risk="" of="" neural="" tube="" defects="" has="" been="" associated="" with="" general="" dietary="" improvement,="" which="" is="" assumed="" to="" increase="" folate="" intake="" by="" unspecified="" amounts.="" in="" response="" to="" this="" proposed="" limitation,="" the="" agency="" received="" comments="" addressing="" the="" separate="" issues="" of="" source="" of="" folate="" and="" amount="" of="" folate.="" a.="" source.="" 7.="" several="" comments="" agreed="" with="" the="" agency's="" proposal,="" stating="" that="" health="" claims="" should="" not="" contain="" statements="" that="" adequate="" diets="" cannot="" provide="" sufficient="" folate,="" or="" that="" only="" fortified="" foods="" or="" supplements="" can="" provide="" adequate="" folate.="" other="" comments="" disagreed,="" stating="" that="" fda="" should="" require="" claims="" to="" state="" that="" the="" evidence="" that="" folate="" reduces="" the="" risk="" of="" neural="" tube="" defects="" is="" stronger="" for="" supplements="" than="" for="" food.="" other="" comments="" stated="" that="" evidence="" that="" folate-rich="" diets="" reduce="" the="" risk="" of="" neural="" tube="" defects="" is="" only="" suggestive,="" while="" evidence="" that="" folic="" acid="" containing-supplements="" reduce="" the="" risk="" of="" neural="" tube="" defects="" is="" conclusive.="" the="" agency="" agrees="" with="" comments="" that="" health="" claims="" should="" not="" contain="" statements="" that="" diets="" cannot="" provide="" sufficient="" folate="" to="" affect="" the="" risk="" of="" a="" neural="" tube="" defect="" because="" such="" statements="" are="" inconsistent="" with="" the="" available="" scientific="" evidence.="" the="" studies="" of="" milunsky="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 11),="" bower="" and="" stanley="" (ref.="" 16),="" werler="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 13),="" and="" laurence="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 17)="" were="" summarized="" in="" response="" to="" comment="" 6,="" above.="" milunsky="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" [[page="" 8760]]="" 11),="" bower="" and="" stanley="" (ref.="" 16),="" and="" werler="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 13)="" all="" presented="" data="" on="" the="" relationship="" of="" dietary="" folate="" to="" risk="" of="" neural="" tube="" defects="" among="" nonusers="" of="" dietary="" supplements.="" each="" of="" these="" studies="" found="" reduced="" risk="" of="" neural="" tube="" defects="" associated="" with="" increasing="" intakes="" of="" dietary="" folate.="" laurence="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 17)="" found="" fairly="" strong="" protection="" against="" recurrence="" of="" neural="" tube="" defects="" associated="" with="" improvement="" in="" overall="" diets.="" fda="" concludes,="" based="" on="" its="" review="" of="" the="" scientific="" literature,="" that="" the="" proposed="" limitation="" in="" sec.="" 101.79="" on="" statements="" that="" specific="" sources="" are="" superior="" to="" others="" is="" appropriate="" because="" the="" scientific="" literature="" does="" not="" support="" the="" superiority="" of="" any="" one="" source="" over="" others.="" as="" noted="" above,="" both="" folate="" from="" conventional="" foods="" and="" folic="" acid="" from="" fortified="" foods="" or="" dietary="" supplements="" are="" converted="" into="" functional,="" metabolically="" active="" coenzyme="" forms="" for="" use="" in="" the="" body="" (ref.="" 19).="" thus,="" in="" the="" absence="" of="" the="" limitation,="" manufacturers="" would="" be="" free="" to="" put="" statements="" that="" would="" be="" false="" and="" misleading="" in="" their="" labeling.="" the="" agency's="" conclusion="" is="" consistent="" with="" phs's="" recommendation="" that="" advises="" that="" careful="" selection="" of="" foods="" is="" one="" means="" by="" which="" women="" can="" increase="" their="" folate="" intakes.="" b.="" amount.="" 8.="" several="" comments="" agreed="" with="" the="" agency="" that="" the="" claim="" should="" not="" state="" that="" a="" specific="" amount="" of="" folate="" is="" more="" effective="" than="" another="" amount.="" several="" comments="" noted="" that="" dose/response="" data="" to="" justify="" such="" statements="" do="" not="" exist,="" and="" that="" scientists="" do="" not="" yet="" know="" the="" requisite="" folate="" level="" that="" will="" protect="" the="" fetus="" from="" a="" neural="" tube="" defect.="" other="" comments="" disagreed,="" stating="" that="" claims="" should="" state="" that="" experts="" recommend="" 400="" mcg="" per="" day="" or="" 100="" percent="" of="" the="" dv="" when="" referring="" to="" adequate="" amounts="" of="" folate.="" another="" comment="" stated="" that="" while="" the="" 400="" mcg="" level="" is="" admittedly="" imprecise,="" it="" is="" the="" recommendation="" of="" phs.="" another="" comment="" stated="" that="" consumers="" need="" to="" be="" reminded="" that="" a="" reduction="" in="" neural="" tube="" defects="" will="" only="" occur="" if="" all="" women="" consume="" 400="" mcg="" folate="" per="" day="" throughout="" their="" childbearing="" years.="" the="" agency="" agrees="" with="" comments="" that="" dose/response="" data="" are="" insufficient="" to="" provide="" a="" basis="" for="" stating="" that="" a="" specific="" amount="" of="" folate="" is="" more="" effective="" than="" another="" amount.="" the="" quantitative="" results="" from="" the="" studies="" of="" milunsky="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 11),="" bower="" and="" stanley="" (ref.="" 16),="" and="" werler="" et="" al.="" (ref.="" 13)="" suggest="" that="" amounts="" lower="" than="" the="" current="" recommendation="" of="" 400="" mcg="" may="" be="" protective.="" after="" reviewing="" the="" comments="" above="" and="" the="" available="" scientific="" literature,="" fda="" concludes="" that="" the="" comments="" do="" not="" provide="" a="" basis="" for="" the="" agency="" to="" change="" its="" position="" regarding="" prohibition="" of="" statements="" in="" the="" claim="" that="" imply="" that="" specific="" amounts="" of="" folate="" are="" superior="" to="" other="" amounts="" because="" such="" statements="" are="" inconsistent="" with="" the="" scientific="" data.="" fda's="" conclusion="" is="" consistent="" with="" information="" provided="" in="" the="" phs="" recommendation="" that="" states="" that="" amounts="" of="" folate="" lower="" than="" 400="" mcg="" may="" reduce="" the="" risk="" of="" neural="" tube="" defects,="" and="" that="" additional="" research="" is="" needed="" to="" establish="" the="" minimum="" effective="" dose="" (ref.="" 5).="" again,="" a="" contrary="" position="" by="" the="" agency="" would="" permit="" false="" statements="" to="" appear="" on="" the="" label.="" in="" the="" final="" codified="" language,="" the="" agency="" is="" redesignating="" proposed="" sec.="" 101.79(c)(2)(i)(h)="" as="" sec.="" 101.79(c)(2)(i)(g)="" and,="" for="" the="" reasons="" stated="" above,="" is="" prohibiting="" in="" sec.="" 101.79(c)(2)(i)(g)="" claims="" that="" a="" specified="" amount="" of="" folate="" per="" serving="" from="" one="" source="" is="" more="" effective="" in="" reducing="" the="" risk="" of="" neural="" tube="" defects="" than="" a="" lower="" amount="" per="" serving="" from="" another="" source.="" c.="" restriction="" of="" claims="" to="" specific="" products.="" 9.="" several="" comments="" stated="" that="" the="" health="" claim="" should="" be="" limited="" to="" supplements="" containing="" 400="" or="" 800="" mcg="" of="" folate="" or="" limited="" to="" dietary="" supplements="" or="" breakfast="" cereals="" containing="" 400="" mcg="" of="" folate.="" other="" comments="" stated="" that="" health="" claims="" should="" not="" be="" allowed="" for="" naturally="" occurring="" food="" folates.="" another="" comment="" stated="" that="" to="" allow="" health="" claims="" solely="" on="" supplements="" or="" fortified="" foods="" would="" undermine="" the="" need="" for="" women="" to="" learn="" to="" eat="" more="" healthfully="" and="" to="" obtain="" a="" full="" array="" of="" nutrients="" found="" in="" a="" balanced="" diet.="" the="" agency="" disagrees="" with="" comments="" that="" recommended="" that="" it="" limit="" claims="" to="" dietary="" supplements="" or="" to="" dietary="" supplements="" and="" fortified="" breakfast="" cereals="" that="" contain="" 400="" mcg="" or="" more="" of="" folate.="" the="" agency's="" review="" of="" the="" scientific="" literature,="" summarized="" in="" response="" to="" comments="" 6="" to="" 8="" above,="" provides="" no="" basis="" for="" making="" a="" distinction="" in="" source="" or="" in="" amount="" between="" folate="" from="" conventional="" foods="" and="" folic="" acid="" from="" dietary="" supplements="" or="" fortified="" cereals="" because="" the="" available="" evidence="" shows="" that="" increased="" folate="" intake,="" rather="" than="" the="" source="" of="" the="" folate,="" is="" what="" is="" of="" importance="" in="" reducing="" the="" risk="" of="" neural="" tube="" defects="" (ref.="" 5).="" increasing="" total="" folate="" intake="" among="" women="" of="" childbearing="" age,="" rather="" than="" emphasis="" on="" one="" source="" versus="" another,="" is="" what="" is="" of="" importance.="" this="" conclusion="" is="" consistent="" with="" phs's="" recommendation,="" which="" states="" that="" improvement="" in="" dietary="" habits="" and="" use="" of="" dietary="" supplements="" are="" both="" appropriate="" approaches="" by="" which="" women="" may="" increase="" their="" folate="" intake.="" d.="" target="" intake="" goal.="" the="" agency="" proposed="" in="" sec.="" 101.79(c)(3)(iv)="" to="" include="" as="" optional="" information="" in="" the="" health="" claim="" a="" statement="" that="" the="" dv="" level="" of="" 400="" mcg="" of="" folate="" is="" the="" target="" intake="" goal.="" 10.="" several="" comments="" stated="" that="" all="" health="" claims="" should="" refer="" to="" the="" likely="" effectiveness="" of="" 400="" mcg="" of="" folate,="" or="" that="" claims="" should="" be="" required="" to="" state="" that="" experts="" recommend="" 400="" mcg="" per="" day.="" other="" comments="" stated="" that="" 400="" mcg="" is="" the="" phs="" recommendation,="" and="" without="" this="" information,="" women="" may="" assume="" that="" lower="" amounts="" are="" adequate.="" the="" agency="" disagrees="" with="" these="" comments.="" fda="" chose="" not="" to="" propose="" to="" require="" that="" claims="" identify="" 400="" mcg="" as="" the="" target="" intake="" goal="" because="" it="" tentatively="" concluded="" that="" there="" is="" uncertainty="" as="" to="" the="" optimal="" intake="" of="" folate="" with="" respect="" to="" reduction="" in="" risk="" of="" neural="" tube="" defects="" (ref.="" 5).="" as="" noted="" above,="" several="" studies="" (refs.="" 11="" and="" 13)="" have="" found="" reductions="" in="" risk="" of="" neural="" tube="" defect-affected="" pregnancies="" at="" folate="" intakes="" below="" 400="" mcg="" per="" day.="" none="" of="" the="" comments="" provided="" evidence="" that="" showed="" that="" these="" findings="" were="" not="" valid.="" thus,="" fda="" concludes="" that="" a="" requirement="" that="" claims="" state="" that="" women="" must="" consume="" 400="" mcg="" folate="" per="" day="" to="" achieve="" a="" reduction="" in="" risk="" of="" a="" neural="" tube="" defect-affected="" pregnancy="" would="" be="" inconsistent="" with="" the="" available="" scientific="" data.="" however,="" because="" 400="" mcg="" is="" the="" reference="" daily="" intake="" (rdi),="" because="" phs="" recommends="" a="" 400="" mcg/day="" intake,="" and="" because="" the="" folic="" acid="" subcommittee="" supported="" the="" 400="" mcg/day="" intake="" goal,="" the="" agency="" has="" concluded="" that="" it="" may="" be="" helpful="" to="" some="" consumers="" if="" the="" health="" claim="" were="" to="" include="" information="" that="" the="" rdi="" of="" 400="" mcg="" per="" day="" is="" the="" target="" intake="" goal.="" therefore,="" fda="" is="" adopting="" sec.="" 101.79(c)(3)(iv)="" to="" allow="" for="" optional="" inclusion="" of="" this="" information,="" with="" the="" target="" intake="" goal="" (400="" mcg;="" 0.4="" mg)="" expressed="" as="" 100="" percent="" dv.="" claims="" may="" identify="" 100="" percent="" of="" the="" dv="" (400="" mcg="" folate)="" as="" the="" target="" intake="" goal="" and="" may="" state="" the="" phs="" recommended="" daily="" intake="" (400="" mcg="" folate,="" 0.4="" mg).="" 3.="" focusing="" on="" the="" periconceptional="" interval="" in="" proposed="" sec.="" 101.79(a)(1),="" the="" agency="" defined="" neural="" tube="" defects="" as="" serious="" birth="" defects="" of="" the="" brain="" or="" spinal="" cord.="" the="" agency="" noted="" that="" these="" defects="" result="" from="" a="" failure="" of="" the="" covering="" of="" the="" brain="" or="" spinal="" cord="" to="" close="" during="" [[page="" 8761]]="" early="" embryonic="" development="" and="" further="" noted="" that,="" because="" the="" neural="" tube="" forms="" and="" closes="" during="" early="" pregnancy,="" the="" defect="" may="" occur="" before="" a="" woman="" realizes="" that="" she="" is="" pregnant.="" in="" proposed="" sec.="" 101.79(a)(2),="" the="" agency="" described="" the="" relationship="" between="" adequate="" folate="" intake="" and="" reduced="" risk="" of="" a="" neural="" tube="" defect-="" affected="" pregnancy="" and="" summarized="" the="" studies="" whose="" results="" provide="" the="" basis="" for="" the="" health="" claim.="" 11.="" a="" number="" of="" comments="" stated="" that="" studies="" have="" shown="" that="" folic="" acid="" added="" to="" the="" diet="" before="" pregnancy="" reduces="" the="" risk="" of="" neural="" tube="" defects,="" and="" that="" the="" relationship="" statement="" should="" be="" corrected="" to="" reflect="" this="" fact.="" the="" agency="" agrees="" that="" the="" studies="" that="" provide="" the="" basis="" for="" the="" relationship="" between="" folate="" and="" neural="" tube="" defects="" focused="" on="" improved="" folate="" nutriture="" before="" conception="" and="" continuing="" into="" early="" pregnancy.="" therefore,="" the="" agency="" is="" modifying="" several="" of="" the="" statements="" in="" sec.="" 101.79(a)(2)="" to="" more="" precisely="" describe="" the="" results="" of="" these="" studies.="" specifically,="" fda="" is="" modifying="" the="" second="" sentence="" of="" sec.="" 101.79(a)(2)="" to="" state="" that="" in="" the="" studies="" described,="" folic="" acid="" was="" consumed="" daily="" ``before="" conception="" and="" continuing="" into="" early="" pregnancy="" *="" *="" *,''="" and="" the="" fourth="" sentence="" to="" state="" that="" the="" study="" involved="" reported="" periconceptional="" use="" of="" multivitamins="" that="" contained="" folic="" acid.="" 12.="" a="" comment="" suggested="" that="" claims="" be="" allowed="" to="" be="" more="" precise="" in="" describing="" the="" period="" during="" which="" adequate="" folate="" is="" needed.="" the="" comment="" noted="" that="" the="" statement="" relating="" to="" daily="" consumption="" of="" folate="" throughout="" the="" childbearing="" years="" implies="" that="" body="" folate="" stores="" must="" be="" built="" up="" over="" decades,="" while="" studies="" have="" shown="" that="" it="" is="" sufficient="" to="" consume="" folate="" during="" the="" weeks="" before="" the="" neural="" tube="" closes.="" the="" comment="" proposed="" that="" a="" statement="" that="" women="" who="" consume="" adequate="" amounts="" of="" folate="" during="" the="" month="" before="" and="" after="" becoming="" pregnant="" may="" reduce="" their="" risk="" of="" a="" neural="" tube="" defect="" would="" convey="" this="" information.="" another="" comment="" criticized="" the="" model="" health="" claims="" provided="" by="" the="" agency="" because="" they="" failed="" to="" alert="" women="" to="" the="" critical="" periconceptional="" period.="" the="" agency="" recognizes="" that="" the="" scientific="" data="" support="" the="" need="" for="" specific="" attention="" to="" folate="" intake="" in="" the="" periconceptional="" interval="" and="" has="" modified="" sec.="" 101.79(a)(2)="" to="" reflect="" this="" fact="" by="" specifically="" mentioning="" periconceptional="" use.="" the="" agency="" notes="" that="" one="" of="" the="" purposes="" of="" health="" claims="" is="" to="" assist="" women="" in="" recognizing="" the="" importance="" of="" healthful="" diets,="" including="" adequate="" folate="" nutriture="" throughout="" their="" childbearing="" years="" (see="" h.="" rept.="" 101-538,="" 101st="" cong.,="" 2d="" sess.="" 9-10="" (1990)).="" given="" that="" about="" 50="" percent="" of="" pregnancies="" are="" unplanned,="" and="" that="" many="" women="" may="" not="" recognize="" that="" they="" are="" pregnant="" until="" after="" the="" critical="" period="" of="" neural="" tube="" closure,="" it="" is="" important="" for="" women="" to="" maintain="" healthful="" diets="" throughout="" their="" childbearing="" years.="" while="" some="" women="" who="" plan="" their="" pregnancies="" might="" benefit="" from="" the="" more="" specific="" information="" suggested="" in="" the="" comment,="" the="" agency="" concludes="" that="" the="" more="" general="" wording="" in="" the="" model="" claims="" will="" reach="" a="" wider="" group="" of="" women="" and="" provide="" them="" with="" useful="" and="" important="" information.="" fda="" is="" adopting="" sec.="" 101.79(c)(3)(ii),="" which="" states="" that="" health="" claims="" may="" include="" statements="" from="" paragraphs="" sec.="" 101.79="" (a)="" and="" (b).="" through="" the="" use="" of="" statements="" derived="" from="" sec.="" 101.79(a)(2),="" manufacturers="" will="" be="" able="" to="" provide="" information="" that="" alerts="" women="" to="" the="" importance="" of="" the="" periconceptional="" period.="" 4.="" ``will="" reduce''="" versus="" ``may="" reduce''="" 13.="" one="" comment="" stated="" that="" proposed="" sec.="" 101.79(a)(2),="" which="" stated="" that="" available="" data="" show="" that="" diets="" adequate="" in="" folate="" may="" reduce="" the="" risk="" of="" neural="" tube="" defects,="" was="" misleading="" and="" recommended="" that="" this="" section="" be="" reworded="" to="" state="" that="" ``studies="" have="" shown="" that="" folic="" acid="" added="" to="" the="" diet="" before="" a="" pregnancy="" occurs="" will="" reduce="" the="" risk="" of="" neural="" tube="" defects.''="" the="" agency="" disagrees="" with="" the="" assertion="" that="" adequate="" folate="" intake="" will="" reduce="" the="" risk="" of="" neural="" tube="" defects.="" the="" available="" data="" show="" that="" in="" an="" area="" of="" low="" prevalence="" of="" neural="" tube="" defects,="" folate="" intake="" from="" dietary="" supplements="" or="" from="" fortified="" cereals="" was="" not="" associated="" with="" reduced="" risk="" of="" neural="" tube="" defects="" (ref.="" 12).="" the="" agency="" did="" not="" receive="" any="" data="" or="" information="" challenging="" this="" data.="" the="" agency="" notes="" that="" use="" of="" the="" term="" ``will="" reduce''="" is="" overly="" promissory="" to="" the="" individual="" and="" is="" misleading="" because="" it="" is="" not="" consistent="" with="" the="" available="" data.="" prevalence="" rates="" for="" neural="" tube="" defects="" vary="" with="" a="" wide="" range="" of="" factors="" including="" genetics,="" socioeconomic="" status,="" maternal="" health,="" and="" race.="" the="" agency="" has="" discussed="" the="" multifactorial="" nature="" of="" neural="" tube="" defects="" (and="" will="" do="" so="" again="" below="" (see="" comment="" 36="" of="" this="" document)).="" it="" has="" concluded="" that="" claims="" need="" to="" reflect="" this="" aspect="" of="" the="" nature="" of="" these="" defects="" because="" folate="" intake="" is="" not="" the="" only="" risk="" factor="" for="" them.="" use="" of="" the="" term="" ``will="" reduce''="" in="" the="" claim="" is="" not="" consistent="" with="" the="" multifactorial="" nature="" of="" neural="" tube="" defects.="" thus,="" fda="" finds="" no="" basis="" to="" change="" the="" wording="" of="" sec.="" 101.79(a)(2),="" and="" it="" is="" including="" the="" sentence="" ``the="" available="" data="" show="" that="" diets="" adequate="" in="" folate="" may="" reduce="" the="" risk="" of="" neural="" tube="" defects''="" in="" the="" final="" regulation="" without="" change.="" 5.="" need="" for="" healthful="" diets="" 14.="" some="" members="" of="" the="" folic="" acid="" subcommittee="" expressed="" concern="" about="" a="" single="" nutrient="" approach="" to="" the="" problem="" of="" neural="" tube="" defects="" because="" nutrients="" function="" together="" in="" the="" body.="" another="" comment="" felt="" that="" a="" health="" claim="" for="" folic="" acid="" could="" be="" misinterpreted="" to="" mean="" that="" folic="" acid="" could="" prevent="" all="" birth="" defects.="" one="" comment="" noted="" that,="" because="" nutrients="" function="" synergistically="" in="" the="" body,="" increasing="" a="" single="" nutrient="" is="" unwise.="" another="" comment="" stated="" that="" by="" focusing="" on="" the="" relationship="" between="" a="" single="" nutrient="" and="" a="" single="" outcome,="" opportunities="" to="" improve="" overall="" health="" are="" missed.="" another="" comment="" expressed="" concern="" about="" singling="" out="" one="" vitamin="" for="" a="" health="" claim="" when="" the="" major="" sources="" of="" the="" vitamin="" (e.g.,="" fruits="" and="" vegetables)="" are="" being="" promoted="" for="" good="" health.="" other="" comments="" noted="" that="" in="" pregnancy="" it="" is="" the="" total="" diet,="" not="" a="" single="" nutrient,="" that="" is="" related="" to="" health="" outcome.="" the="" agency="" agrees="" with="" the="" comments="" that="" expressed="" concern="" about="" the="" problems="" in="" focusing="" on="" a="" single-nutrient,="" particularly="" in="" women="" of="" childbearing="" age.="" many="" nutrients="" affect="" healthy="" pregnancy,="" and="" the="" claim="" should="" not="" lead="" women="" to="" focus="" undue="" attention="" on="" one="" nutrient,="" or="" on="" a="" single="" dietary="" factor,="" instead="" of="" on="" overall="" healthful="" diets="" and="" health="" conscious="" behaviors.="" in="" addition,="" because="" healthy="" pregnancies="" and="" good="" pregnancy="" outcomes="" are="" dependent="" upon="" an="" overall="" good="" diet,="" adequate="" in="" protein,="" vitamins="" and="" minerals,="" and="" many="" other="" nutrients,="" women="" should="" not="" be="" misled="" into="" believing="" that="" folate="" is="" the="" only="" nutrient="" about="" which="" they="" need="" to="" be="" concerned="" in="" preparing="" for="" a="" pregnancy.="" with="" respect="" to="" neural="" tube="" defects,="" fda="" in="" its="" proposed="" rule="" (58="" fr="" 53254)="" reviewed="" evidence="" that="" nutrients="" other="" than="" folate="" (e.g.,="" methionine,="" vitamin="">12, pantothenic acid) have roles in reducing the risk of neural 
    tube defects, and additional evidence is summarized in section II.E.6. 
    of this document. Thus, normal fetal development requires many 
    nutrients in addition to the nutrient that is the subject of the health 
    claim.
        Based on these considerations, the agency has concluded that 
    information regarding overall improvement in a woman's diet and 
    nutrition in the 
    
    [[Page 8762]]
    periconceptional interval, as well as throughout her childbearing 
    years, is of considerable importance because pregnancy outcome depends 
    upon adequate intakes of a wide range of nutrients. This concern needs 
    to be balanced against the fact that the available evidence provides 
    the basis for significant scientific agreement that dietary intakes of 
    folate may reduce the risk of neural tube defect-affected pregnancies.
        Therefore, in response to these comments, FDA is including in 
    Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(H) in the final regulation a requirement that the 
    claim state that folate needs to be consumed as part of a healthy diet. 
    This requirement will ensure that, while highlighting the role of 
    adequate folate intake, the health claim will not cause women to place 
    undue emphasis on consumption of this nutrient. Thus, this information 
    is necessary to ensure that the claim is properly balanced.
    
    D. Requirements for Foods Bearing the Claim
    
    1. Qualifying Amounts
        In Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(ii)(A), FDA proposed that the food or dietary 
    supplement meet or exceed the requirements for a ``good source'' of 
    folate as defined in Sec. 101.54 (i.e., containing  10 
    percent of the RDI). In proposing this eligibility requirement, FDA 
    considered that folate is ubiquitously distributed in the U.S. food 
    supply. While a number of foods (e.g., some legumes, okra, broccoli, 
    spinach, turnip greens, asparagus, Brussels sprouts, endive, lentils) 
    contain more than 80 mcg of folate/serving (the amount that is greater 
    than or equal to 20 percent of the RDI (i.e., that amount that would be 
    required for a claim of a ``rich'' source)), the great majority of 
    foods contain folate at lower levels. For example, oranges, grapefruit, 
    many berries, peas, many vegetable juices, beets, and parsnips contain 
    folate at levels of 40 to 80 mcg/serving (i.e., at or above 10 percent 
    of the RDI or at levels that meet the requirement of a claim of a 
    ``good'' source) (Ref. 22).
        a. General comments.
        15. Many comments and the Folic Acid Subcommittee and Food Advisory 
    Committee were generally satisfied with the eligibility requirements 
    and supported FDA's proposal to allow claims on foods that were at 
    least a good source of folate. These comments supported the criterion 
    because it would accommodate a wide variety of fruits and vegetables 
    that would be excluded if the eligibility requirement was set at a 
    higher level. One comment, however, suggested that the proposed amount 
    was too high and might exclude some commonly consumed foods such as 
    peas.
        A third group of comments thought that the proposed amount was too 
    low. Some of the comments said that claims should not be permitted 
    unless the food provides at least 20 percent of the RDI (i.e., 80 mcg 
    folate/serving), arguing that it was poor policy to make exception to 
    the general health claims requirements regulations, and that if the 
    goal is to maximize intake of folate, then 20 percent of the RDI should 
    be the minimum amount allowed for the claim. Others felt strongly that 
    the claim should be limited to those foods or supplements that provide 
    100 percent of the RDI per serving or per dose.
        The agency is concerned that if it required (in accord with 
    Sec. 101.14(d)(2)(vii)) that the food contain 20 percent or more of the 
    RDI for folate (i.e., 80 mcg or more folate per reference amount 
    customarily consumed; an amount sufficient to qualify for a ``high'' or 
    ``excellent source of'' nutrient content claim) to bear a health claim, 
    many good food sources of folate would not qualify without 
    fortification.
        One of Congress' purposes in providing for health claims was to 
    enable Americans to maintain a balanced and healthful diet (H. Rept. 
    101-538, supra, pp. 9-10). Given this fact, and given that the evidence 
    demonstrates that the risk of neural tube defects can be affected by 
    consuming foods that, while good sources of this nutrient, do not 
    provide the high level that is provided by supplements and highly 
    fortified foods (see Refs. 11, 13, 16, and 17), FDA concludes that it 
    would not be consistent with the intent of the 1990 amendments to set 
    requirements that would limit eligibility to bear a health claim to the 
    foods that are high in folate.
        Use of a qualifying criterion for the health claim that is 
    consistent with the ``good source'' definition (i.e., 10 to 19 percent 
    of the DV; 40 to 76 mcg folate/serving) provides for an amount of the 
    nutrient that allows a wide variety of fruits, vegetables, and whole 
    grain products to qualify to bear the health claim, is consistent with 
    current Federal guidelines for general dietary patterns, and yet is 
    still likely to result in a daily dietary intake of folate that the 
    data show may reduce the risk of neural tube defects. For example, 
    current Federal dietary guidelines recommend five or more servings of 
    fruits and vegetables and six or more servings of grain products per 
    day. Consumption of fruits, vegetables, and grain products in the 
    recommended amounts would likely result in daily intakes of folate of 
    0.4 mg (400 mcg) or more, even though individually many of the foods 
    consumed contain less than 20 percent of the RDI for folate per 
    reference serving (Ref. 22).
        Accordingly, FDA is adopting Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(ii)(A), which 
    provides that conventional foods and dietary supplements can bear a 
    folate/neural tube defect health claim if they contain 10 percent or 
    more of the RDI for folate per reference amount customarily consumed 
    (i.e., meet the definition for a ``good source'' claim in Sec. 101.54 
    (21 CFR 101.54)). The availability of the claim for a wide variety of 
    products will provide flexibility to women in deciding how to 
    individually achieve the target intake by selecting from among foods 
    that naturally contain folate, dietary supplements, and highly 
    fortified foods.
        b. Higher qualifying amounts for dietary supplements than for 
    foods. 
        16. Several comments stated that to qualify to bear the claim, each 
    food should provide at least 25 percent of the RDI, and each supplement 
    should provide 100 percent of the RDI. However, these comments did not 
    provide any support for the levels that they suggested or for why 
    supplements should have to have a higher level of the nutrient than a 
    conventional food.
        Having dealt with the level necessary to qualify to bear the claim 
    in response to the previous comment, the agency will deal here with the 
    question of whether, to qualify for a claim, dietary supplements should 
    be required to provide more folate than foods. The agency concludes 
    that there is no reason why they should. In response to comment 7 of 
    this document, the agency concluded that the available scientific 
    evidence establishes that sources of folate are equivalent in their 
    ability to provide folate. Thus, there is no basis for requiring that 
    either dietary supplements or conventional foods provide more than 10 
    percent of the RDI for folate per reference amount customarily consumed 
    to qualify for the claim.
    2. Disintegration and Dissolution of Dietary Supplements
        FDA proposed in Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(ii)(C) to disqualify dietary 
    supplements from bearing a health claim if they fail to meet the United 
    States Pharmacopeia (USP) standards for disintegration and dissolution. 
    The agency tentatively concluded that the benefits of folate intake 
    from food and dietary supplements can only be obtained if the folate is 
    available for absorption and metabolism by the body. The agency noted 
    that a dietary supplement that does not disintegrate and dissolve 
    
    [[Page 8763]]
    clearly does not provide the nutrient in an assimilable form, and that 
    a claim for such a supplement would be misleading because the 
    supplement would not provide the nutrient that is the subject of the 
    health claim (58 FR 58283).
        17. Several comments agreed with the agency's proposed requirement 
    and urged the agency to require all dietary supplements to meet such 
    quality standards. Another comment proposed that the agency use the USP 
    standards that are currently under development, and that the 
    dissolution requirement become effective when the USP proposal becomes 
    effective. The USP commented and proposed wording for use in 
    Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(ii)(C): ``Folic acid present in dietary supplement 
    dosage forms (e.g., tablets, capsules) shall meet the requirements of 
    the United States Pharmacopeia as defined in Section 201(j) of the 
    act.''
        Another comment stated that in making this proposed requirement 
    effective for dietary supplements, the agency would accord the same 
    claim to foods (i.e., conventional foods) without similar requirements 
    for bioavailability, and that excluding foods from this requirement was 
    scientifically unjustified. The comment did not identify conventional 
    foods from which folate had been demonstrated to be unavailable or 
    elaborate on the concern.
        The agency proposed that dietary supplements meet USP standards for 
    dissolution and disintegration, and that bioavailability under 
    conditions of use stated on the label be shown only if there are no 
    applicable USP standards for disintegration and dissolution. Thus, the 
    agency proposed that a demonstration of bioavailability would be 
    required only if there were no USP method available to check for 
    dissolution and disintegration.
        The comment that stated that in making the requirement proposed in 
    Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(ii)(C) effective for dietary supplements, the agency 
    would accord the same claim to conventional foods without similar 
    requirements, may have misread the agency's proposed requirement. 
    ``Bioavailability'' includes, but is not limited to, dissolution and 
    disintegration. Dissolution and disintegration are necessary 
    preconditions for absorption and subsequent metabolism. Digestive 
    processes ensure that conventional foods are digested, and that 
    components are liberated for absorption. With respect to the 
    bioavailability of folate from conventional foods, the agency is aware 
    that the bioavailability of folate varies widely but is not aware of 
    any foods from which folate has been shown to be unavailable.
        However, dietary supplements, including folate-containing 
    supplements, can be manufactured in a manner that prevents dissolution 
    and disintegration (e.g., extremely compressed preparations), and the 
    digestive processes may be insufficient to ensure the liberation of the 
    components for absorption. The components of such a supplement would 
    not be available for absorption and utilization by the body. A claim on 
    a dietary supplement that does not disintegrate or dissolve would be 
    misleading because the supplement would not meet the preconditions 
    necessary to ensure that the nutrient that is the subject of the claim 
    is available for absorption.
        The agency did not receive other comments contending that dietary 
    supplements should not meet USP standards for disintegration and 
    dissolution, or that bioavailability should not be demonstrated when 
    applicable USP disintegration and dissolution standards are not 
    available. The agency is adopting Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(ii)(C) as proposed 
    and is redesignating it as Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(ii)(B).
    3. No Health Claim on Foods or Supplements Containing More Than 100 
    Percent of the RDI for Preformed Vitamin A or Vitamin D
        In Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(iii), FDA proposed that a health claim for 
    folate and neural tube defects be prohibited on conventional foods and 
    on dietary supplements that contain more than 100 percent of the RDI 
    for vitamin A as retinol or preformed vitamin A or vitamin D per 
    serving or per unit. The agency proposed this limitation because of the 
    recognized toxicity of high intakes of these vitamins for the fetus and 
    the teratogenic effects of these nutrients at levels not greatly in 
    excess of the RDI.
        18. Several comments agreed with FDA's proposal, noting that many 
    dietary supplements currently contain more than 100 percent of the RDI 
    for vitamin A, and that such levels are unnecessary and potentially 
    harmful. Another comment misread the proposed requirement regarding 
    vitamin A and noted that since manufacturers were now increasing the 
    -carotene content of supplements because of health benefits, 
    these supplements should not be excluded from carrying a folate/neural 
    tube defect claim because of their high -carotene content.
        The agency is aware that folate is often combined with other 
    nutrients, particularly vitamins and minerals, in dietary supplement 
    formulations or in highly fortified foods. In light of the expectation 
    that the presence of a health claim on the label of such products is 
    likely to result in increased intake of these products, FDA is 
    concerned that some consumers may try to increase their folate intake 
    by consuming multiple doses of dietary supplements or multiple servings 
    of highly fortified foods. The agency was concerned that, for some 
    fortified foods and dietary supplements that contain both folate and 
    preformed vitamin A or vitamin D, consumers could be exposed to 
    excessive vitamin A or vitamin D intakes in their attempts to obtain 
    increased amounts of folate. The agency, however, did not propose 
    similar requirements for -carotene because the agency is not 
    aware of data on potential teratogenic or other adverse effects of 
    -carotene on the fetus.
        This limitation is consistent with other recent recommendations. In 
    1991, the CDC recommendation for increased intake of folate by women 
    with a history of a neural tube defect- affected pregnancy (Ref. 23) 
    warned against overconsumption of multivitamins because of the 
    potential for excessive intakes of vitamins A and D from such 
    preparations and the known adverse effects of these vitamins on the 
    health of the fetus. In addition, recent recommendations in Canada for 
    women of childbearing age regarding folic acid and neural tube defects 
    recognized the teratogenicity of high levels of vitamin A and cautioned 
    against excessive intakes of this nutrient (Ref. 24).
        With the exception of the comment regarding -carotene 
    discussed above, the agency received no comments objecting to this 
    requirement. Thus, the agency is adopting Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(iii) as 
    proposed. The agency advises that the limitation contained in this 
    provision pertains only to conventional foods or to dietary supplements 
    that contain more than 100 percent of the RDI for vitamin A as retinol 
    or preformed vitamin A or vitamin D.
    
    E. Label Information
    
    1. Mandatory Nutrition Labeling
        In Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(iv), FDA proposed to require that the 
    nutrition label of conventional foods or dietary supplements bearing 
    the folate/neural tube defect health claim provide information about 
    the amount of folate in the food or dietary supplement. This proposed 
    requirement is consistent with Sec. 101.9(c)(8)(ii) (21 CFR 
    101.9(c)(8)(i)), which states that the declaration of vitamins and 
    minerals on the nutrition label shall include any of the vitamins
    
    [[Page 8764]]
    
    and minerals listed in Sec. 101.9(c)(8)(iv) when a claim is made about 
    them.
        19. One comment agreed with the proposed requirement for mandatory 
    nutrition labeling on products bearing the folate/neural tube defects 
    health claim. Another comment noted that use of multiple terms such as 
    ``micrograms,'' milligrams,'' etc., would probably confuse lay persons.
        The agency agrees with the comments and is adopting, with the 
    modifications noted below, the requirement in Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(iv) 
    that products bearing the health claim include in the nutrition 
    labeling information about the amount of folate in the food.
        FDA adopted the 1980 Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) values as 
    RDI values, with folate values expressed on the label in milligrams 
    (mg) and percent of the DV (58 FR 2206, January 6, 1993). In the 
    Federal Register of January 4, 1994 (59 FR 427 at 431), FDA proposed to 
    amend Sec. 101.9 by revising paragraph (c)(8)(iv) to state, among other 
    things, the RDI for folate in micrograms (i.e., 400 micrograms; 400 
    mcg). The agency stated that changing the current unit of measure for 
    folate will facilitate consumer comprehension of quantitative nutrient 
    information because consumers are more familiar with this nutrient 
    being expressed in microgram units.
        In Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(F) and (c)(3)(iv), FDA has modified the 
    codified language so that all references to folate intake in the health 
    claim will be required to be expressed as percent DV with the option of 
    adding the microgram equivalent in parentheses. That is, values for 
    folate will be expressed as percent of the DV (i.e., the percent of the 
    RDI as established in Sec. 101.9(c)(8)(iv)). FDA has modified the 
    codified language in Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(F) so that reference to the 
    safe upper limit of daily folate intake in the health claim will also 
    be required to be expressed as percent DV with the option of adding the 
    microgram equivalent in parentheses (see comment 32 of this document). 
    Thus, in response to the comment's concern about the confusion that 
    would result if multiple terms are used to describe the level of 
    folate, FDA has modified the regulations to provide for consistent 
    terminology.
    2. Identifying the Nutrient
        In proposed Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(B), FDA considered the use of 
    synonyms for ``folate'' and the need to aid consumers in understanding 
    this nutrient. The agency provided for the use of synonyms and for 
    additional description of this term through phrases such as ``folate,'' 
    ``folic acid,'' ``folacin,'' ``folate, a B vitamin,'' ``folic acid, a B 
    vitamin,'' and ``folacin, a B vitamin.''
        20. Several comments agreed that the agency's proposed synonyms are 
    appropriate. Other comments urged that a single term, for example, 
    ``folic acid,'' ``folic acid, a B vitamin,'' ``folate,'' or ``folate, a 
    B vitamin,'' be used throughout all claims. Other comments agreed with 
    the use of the agency's proposed synonyms to encourage the consumption 
    of healthy diets but recommended that claims be worded in such a way as 
    to demonstrate that ``folic acid'' is the effective form. Several 
    comments disagreed with use of the term ``folacin,'' noting that it was 
    rarely used.
        The agency notes that the descriptive term ``a B vitamin'' in 
    conjunction with ``folate,'' ``folacin,'' or ``folic acid'' is commonly 
    used in lay information for consumers and may be useful for consumers 
    in indicating the nutritive function of folate as a vitamin. FDA is 
    thus retaining the provision for its optional use in 
    Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(B).
        FDA recognizes that current regulations for nutrition labeling in 
    Secs. 101.9 and 101.36 do not include the term ``folic acid'' as an 
    allowable synonym for folate. This omission was an oversight when the 
    agency amended Sec. 101.9 (58 FR 2079 at 2178, January 6, 1993), and 
    when it promulgated Sec. 101.36 (59 FR 373, January 4, 1994). Before it 
    was amended, Sec. 101.9 had listed folic acid as the preferred term, 
    with folacin as an allowable parenthetical synonym. When it proposed 
    amendments to Sec. 101.9 in 1990 (55 FR 29847, July 19, 1990), the 
    agency explained why the term ``folate'' was preferable to ``folacin''. 
    However, an explanation for use of ``folic acid'' was inadvertently 
    omitted in that document, as was inclusion of the term ``folic acid'' 
    as an allowable synonym.
        The agency has advised firms that it would have no objection to the 
    use of the term ``folic acid'' in nutrition labeling. In light of 
    common usage and FDA policy, and for consistency among nutrition 
    labeling and health claim regulations, the agency is making a technical 
    amendment to Secs. 101.9 and 101.36 in this final rule to include 
    ``folic acid'' as an allowable synonym for folate.
        The agency notes that, as discussed in comment 6, above, the terms 
    ``folic acid'' and ``folate'' are both used in the PHS recommendation 
    (Ref. 5). By allowing the use of these terms, the PHS recommendation 
    can be quoted directly on the label if all other requirements for the 
    health claim are met. The inappropriateness of limiting the term to 
    ``folic acid'' to describe the relationship has been discussed in 
    response to comment 6 of this document. Therefore, FDA is adopting 
    Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(B) as proposed.
    3. Identifying Diets Adequate in Folate
        In Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(ii)(B), the agency proposed to require that 
    health claims relating folate to neural tube defects identify sources 
    of folate by stating that adequate amounts of folate may be obtained by 
    making specific dietary choices of folate-rich foods, as well as 
    through use of dietary supplements or fortified breakfast cereals. The 
    purpose of this proposed requirement was to assist women in obtaining 
    adequate amounts of folate in their diets by providing information on 
    sources of folate. In proposed Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(ii)(B), the agency 
    provided examples of the types of phrases that could be used to meet 
    this requirement (e.g., ``Adequate amounts of folate, a B vitamin, can 
    be obtained from diets rich in fruits, dark green leafy vegetables and 
    legumes, enriched grain products, fortified cereals, or from dietary 
    supplements'').
        21. Many comments agreed with the proposal to require statements 
    that dietary sources such as fruits, vegetables, and grains may 
    contribute folate to the diet, although some comments disagreed with 
    providing specific details, such as recommended numbers of servings. 
    Other comments supported the agency's proposed approach, emphasizing 
    that the health claim must help consumers understand that, in 
    pregnancy, it is the total diet, not a single food, that is related to 
    health outcome, and that there is good evidence for dietary claims 
    regarding increased folate intake and reduced risk of neural tube 
    defects. Another comment stated that health claims should not reveal a 
    bias against food forms, fortificants, or dietary supplements.
        Other comments disagreed with the proposal to identify healthful 
    dietary patterns on the basis that many women will not change their 
    eating habits, and that it is therefore important to point out the 
    importance of use of dietary supplements. Other comments noted that the 
    statements regarding beneficial diets were overly focused on food and 
    should be made optional, that adding dietary information to the health 
    claim reduces its educational effectiveness, and that inclusion of such 
    information was neither required by law nor consistent with other 
    authorized health claims such as that for calcium and osteoporosis. 
    Several comments recommended that statements regarding diets adequate 
    in folate be made optional because such information is 
    
    [[Page 8765]]
    better presented in educational materials.
        The agency disagrees with the comments that stated that the 
    proposed statements regarding sources of folate were overly focused on 
    food. Such comments imply that FDA was biasing the statements against 
    dietary supplements. In fact, each example included dietary supplements 
    in the list of sources of folate (e.g., fruits, vegetables, enriched 
    grain products, fortified cereals, and dietary supplements). The agency 
    also disagrees that the educational effectiveness of the claim is 
    reduced by inclusion of the proposed statement because statements of 
    this type provide, in an abbreviated form, information on sources of 
    folate about which a consumer may be unaware.
        In the context of a total diet, the consumer needs flexibility in 
    deciding how to increase folate intake. Provision of this information 
    is consistent with section 403(r)(3)(B)(iii) of the act, which states 
    that the claim shall be stated in a way that enables the public to 
    understand the relative significance of the claim in the context of the 
    total daily diet. Awareness of the food sources of folate, including 
    dietary supplements, will assist women in recognizing the significance 
    of the claim in the context of the total diet. Provision of information 
    on sources of folate in the health claim will assist consumers by 
    making them aware that specific foods and dietary supplements contain 
    folate.
        However, FDA recognizes that while there has been a noticeable 
    increase in the use of health claims over the last 2 years, the number 
    of products that bear health claims is not as great as the agency had 
    anticipated. The agency is therefore interested in simplifying claims 
    to facilitate their increased use. The agency is particularly 
    interested in removing so-called ``required'' elements that are not 
    necessary to ensure that the claims are truthful, not misleading, and 
    scientifically valid. While the agency agrees with the comments that 
    supported inclusion of information on the dietary sources of folate, 
    and while it supports health claim statements that include examples of 
    dietary sources of this nutrient, the agency is concerned that 
    requiring such specific information will increase the length of the 
    claim and may dissuade manufacturers from including it in their 
    labeling.
        In comment 14 of this document, the agency concluded that 
    information regarding overall improvement in a woman's diet and 
    nutrition throughout her childbearing years is of considerable 
    importance because pregnancy outcome depends upon adequate intake of a 
    wide range of nutrients. The agency is adopting 
    Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(H), which requires that the health claim state 
    that there is a need for a healthful diet as well as adequate folate 
    intake. FDA has concluded that this information is necessary to ensure 
    that the claims have proper balance.
        The agency is persuaded that shorter claims that state the need for 
    a healthful diet, without reference to specific foods, will meet the 
    objective of encouraging broader use of the claim while alerting women 
    to the importance of overall diet during the childbearing years. 
    Therefore, FDA is requiring that claims state that adequate folate 
    needs to be consumed as part of a healthful diet (see section II.C.5. 
    of this document, and new Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(H)) without identifying 
    specific sources. The appearance of the claim on a wide range of 
    qualifying foods will itself convey information about the variety of 
    sources of folate available to women as part of a healthful total diet.
        Therefore, the agency is removing proposed Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(ii)(B) 
    in its entirety and is adding in the codified language a provision 
    (Sec. 101.79(c)(3)(vii)) for optionally including in the claim 
    information that identifies sources of folate. Because of these 
    changes, FDA has adopted proposed Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(ii)(C) as 
    Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(ii)(B).
    4. Identifying the Health-Related Condition
        In developing proposed Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(C), FDA considered 
    whether women might be confused or not understand the term ``neural 
    tube defect'' and provided for some qualification of this term through 
    use of alternate phrases such as ``the birth defect spina bifida,'' 
    ``the birth defects spina bifida and anencephaly,'' ``spina bifida and 
    anencephaly, birth defects of the brain or spinal cord,'' and ``birth 
    defects of the brain or spinal cord, spina bifida and anencephaly.''
        22. The agency received several comments regarding these proposed 
    synonyms. A comment agreed with the agency that the health-related 
    condition must be specified and stated that the agency's proposed 
    synonyms were appropriate. Another comment noted that ``anencephaly'' 
    is not a familiar term, and that a phrase such as ``certain serious 
    birth defects, neural tube defects'' is preferable. Another comment 
    recommended that only the statement ``neural tube defect'' be allowed 
    because it is the more appropriate and accurate term, and because 
    consumers will benefit from seeing the same identifying statements in 
    health claims on many products. Several comments, however, asserted 
    that consumers will not understand ``neural tube defects'' and stated 
    that a more understandable term might be ``birth defects of the brain 
    and/or spinal cord.''
        The agency has considered these comments and concludes that the 
    term and qualifiers provided in its proposed rule, i.e., ``neural tube 
    defects,'' ``the birth defect spina bifida,'' ``birth defects spina 
    bifida and anencephaly,'' ``spina bifida and anencephaly, birth defects 
    of the brain or spinal cord,'' and ``birth defects of the brain or 
    spinal cord anencephaly or spina bifida,'' will allow manufacturers 
    considerable flexibility in crafting claims and in educating consumers. 
    The agency is also persuaded to include the option of using the simpler 
    terms ``birth defects of the brain or spinal cord'' or ``brain or 
    spinal cord birth defects'' and has modified Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(C) 
    accordingly. The agency accepts the suggestion that use of the latter 
    terms will make the claims simpler and more useful to consumers because 
    the phrase may be more understandable than phrases that include medical 
    terms such as ``neural tube defects'' or ``anencephaly''.
        The agency also considered whether use of the very general terms 
    ``some birth defects'' or ``some serious birth defects'' would be 
    appropriate. As discussed in its January 1993 final rule on folate and 
    neural tube defects (58 FR 2606 at 2610), the act requires that claims 
    on foods be truthful and not misleading. The agency recognizes that, 
    based on the results of the Medical Research Council trial, the 
    association between folate intake and birth defects is limited to 
    neural tube defects. The Medical Research Council trial found that 
    folic acid, while significantly reducing the risk of neural tube 
    defects in women at high risk of recurrence of this complication, did 
    not significantly alter the incidences of a wide variety of other birth 
    defects in the population studied (Ref. 14). Similarly, Czeizel et al. 
    (Ref. 15) reported that the results of the Hungarian trial that studied 
    use of a multivitamin/multimineral supplement containing 0.8 mg of 
    folic acid showed no reduction in incidences of birth defects other 
    than neural tube defects.
        FDA also points out that the prevalence of neural tube defects in 
    the United States has been steadily declining in recent decades, and 
    that the estimated incidence is presently about 1 in 1,600 births (Ref. 
    25). Currently, estimated incidences of other serious birth defects are 
    considerably higher than that for neural tube defects. For 
    
    [[Page 8766]]
    instance, estimated incidences are 1 in 115 for birth defects involving 
    the heart and circulation, 1 in 130 for those involving the muscles and 
    skeleton, 1 in 135 for those involving the genital and urinary tract, 1 
    in 235 for those involving the nervous system and eye, 1 in 735 for 
    club foot, and 1 in 635 for chromosomal syndromes (Ref. 25).
        Because neural tube defects constitute a relatively small fraction 
    of all birth defects, women should not be misled into a false sense of 
    security that they can affect their risk of all birth defects through 
    diets adequate in folate. The agency has therefore decided not to 
    include use of the more general terms ``some birth defects'' or ``some 
    serious birth defects'' because use of such terms would fail to 
    disclose the material fact that the food substance/disease relationship 
    is specifically between folate and neural tube defects. Use of such 
    general terms can create the impression that adequate folate intake 
    will reduce a woman's risk of other serious birth defects, and women 
    might, as a result, discount risk factors for other birth defects 
    (e.g., alcohol use, drug abuse).
    5. Safe Upper Limit of Daily Intake
        Sections 403(r)(3)(A)(ii), 402(a), and 409 of the act establish 
    that the use of a substance in a food must be safe. Based on concerns 
    discussed in the Federal Register of January 6, 1993 (58 FR 2606), the 
    agency concluded that it could not authorize a health claim on folate 
    and neural tube defects at that time. The agency was concerned that the 
    possibility exists that folic acid itself could be a substance that 
    increases the risk of a disease or a health-related condition in 
    persons in the general population (see section 403(r)(3)(A)(ii) of the 
    act).
        Recognizing the potential for adverse effects from high intakes of 
    folate, PHS included a caution statement in its recommendation that 
    ``because the effects of higher intakes are not well known but include 
    complicating the diagnosis of vitamin B12 deficiency, care should 
    be taken to keep total folate consumption at <1 mg="" per="" day,="" except="" under="" the="" supervision="" of="" a="" physician''="" (ref.="" 5).="" in="" sec.="" 101.79(c)(2)(i)(g),="" fda="" proposed="" to="" require="" a="" statement="" as="" part="" of="" the="" health="" claim="" on="" fortified="" foods="" in="" conventional="" food="" form="" and="" on="" dietary="" supplements="" containing="" more="" than="" 25="" percent="" of="" the="" rdi="" for="" folate="" per="" unit="" or="" per="" serving="" that="" 1="" mg="" of="" folate="" per="" day="" is="" the="" safe="" upper="" limit="" of="" intake.="" the="" agency="" noted="" that="" the="" availability="" of="" the="" health="" claim="" would="" likely="" encourage="" increased="" intakes="" of="" health-="" claim="" labeled="" foods,="" and="" that,="" if="" intakes="" of="" highly="" fortified="" foods="" and="" dietary="" supplements="" were="" increased,="" it="" could="" result="" in="" folate="" intakes="" above="" the="" level="" known="" to="" be="" safe.="" the="" agency="" received="" comments="" addressing="" two="" issues="" related="" to="" safe="" use="" of="" foods="" bearing="" health="" claims:="" (1)="" is="" there="" a="" need="" for="" concern="" about="" a="" safe="" upper="" limit="" of="" daily="" intake?="" (2)="" if="" so,="" should="" a="" statement="" identifying="" a="" safe="" upper="" limit="" of="" intake="" be="" included="" in="" a="" health="" claim,="" and="" how="" should="" such="" a="" statement="" be="" worded?="" a.="" need="" for="" concern="" about="" a="" safe="" upper="" limit="" of="" daily="" intake.="" fda="" tentatively="" concluded="" that,="" under="" certain="" circumstances,="" there="" was="" a="" need="" to="" disclose="" the="" safe="" upper="" limit="" of="" intake="" in="" the="" health="" claim="" and="" tentatively="" decided="" to="" use="" 1="" mg="" per="" day="" (1,000="" mcg;="" 250="" percent="" of="" the="" dv)="" of="" total="" folate="" as="" the="" upper="" limit="" for="" such="" intake="" (58="" fr="" 53254="" at="" 53273).="" the="" agency="" noted="" in="" the="" final="" rule="" of="" january="" 6,="" 1993="" (58="" fr="" 2606="" at="" 2612),="" and="" the="" proposed="" rule="" of="" october="" 14,="" 1993="" (58="" fr="" 53254="" at="" 53266),="" that="" there="" is="" a="" general="" paucity="" of="" evidence="" on="" the="" safety="" of="" daily="" folate="" intakes="" above="" 1,000="" mcg="" (1="" mg).="" the="" agency="" noted="" that="" there="" may="" be="" risks="" attendant="" upon="" increased="" consumption="" of="" folate="" for="" some="" groups="" in="" the="" population.="" the="" agency="" stated="" that,="" at="" the="" present="" time,="" the="" potential="" adverse="" effect="" that="" has="" been="" most="" extensively="" documented="" is="" a="" masking="" of="" anemia="" in="" persons="" with="" vitamin="">12 
    deficiency, while irreversible neurologic damage progresses. Other 
    groups at risk from excessive intakes of folate include pregnant women, 
    persons on antiseizure (i.e., antiepileptic) medications, and those on 
    antifolate medications. There were no data to identify the magnitude of 
    other possible risks of increased folate intake or to establish safe 
    use at daily intakes above 1,000 mcg.
        In its proposal of October 14, 1993 (58 FR 53254 at 53266), the 
    agency described how it had reached its tentative decision that 1 mg of 
    total folate per day was the safe upper limit of intake. Based on its 
    review of the scientific literature and its discussions with the Folic 
    Acid Subcommittee, the agency tentatively concluded that: (1) For those 
    with vitamin B12 deficiency, there was little likelihood of 
    problems at daily intakes lower than 1 mg (58 FR 53254 at 53268 to 
    53270); (2) an upper limit of intake of 1 mg of folate per day was safe 
    for pregnant women and for persons with epilepsy; (3) doses of folic 
    acid of up to 1 mg per day have not been reported to reduce the 
    effectiveness of medications that interfere with folate metabolism; (4) 
    effects of long-term continuous exposures of body tissues to elevated 
    blood levels of folic acid, which occur when the body's capacity to 
    metabolize folic acid is exceeded, have not been evaluated; and (5) 
    there have been no long-term studies to quantitate the effects, if any, 
    of increased folate intake on the metabolism of other nutrients.
        The agency stated (58 FR 53254 at 53268) that it knew of no data 
    that would support the long-term safety of continuous daily folate 
    intakes of more than 1 mg. The agency, noting that the value of 1 mg 
    for a safe upper limit of daily folate intake could be modified if data 
    were available to support such a decision, solicited comments and data 
    on this point.
        In addition, the agency described how it had reached its tentative 
    decision that a statement that 1 mg of total folate per day was the 
    safe upper limit of daily intake should be required on products bearing 
    the health claim and fortified above 25 percent of the RDI for folate. 
    The agency's tentative conclusion was based on, among other 
    considerations: (1) The scientific evidence, and the view expressed by 
    experts, that there are no data to ensure that adverse effects are not 
    likely to occur at daily intakes above 1 mg (Refs. 6, 7, 8, and 26); 
    (2) the PHS recommendation that folate intake of women of childbearing 
    age should not exceed 1 mg per day (Ref. 5); and (3) the support by the 
    Folic Acid Subcommittee of FDA's use of 1 mg of total folate per day as 
    a safe upper limit guide when considering fortification strategies. The 
    upper safe limit of intake that FDA proposed was based on its best 
    scientific judgment at the time. The agency solicited comments and data 
    on its tentative judgment.
        Some comments expressed uncertainty regarding an amount that would 
    represent a safe upper limit of daily intake of folate, while other 
    comments strongly agreed or strongly disagreed with FDA's proposal that 
    1,000 mcg of total folate per day is the safe upper limit of intake.
        The agency did not receive any data relating to safety of long-term 
    intakes of folate at levels above 1 mg per day for any of the groups 
    considered at potential risk from increased intakes.
        23. Several comments noted that the agency should not misconstrue 
    the absence of safety data on folate intakes of 1 to 4 mg (1,000 to 
    4,000 mcg) per day as evidence of the absence of harm; that because 
    daily intakes for the general population are well below 1 mg, it has 
    never been established that 1 mg per day of folate from all sources is 
    a safe daily upper limit; and that the upper safe limit of intake for 
    African-Americans, and perhaps Hispanic 
    
    [[Page 8767]]
    Americans, is not known. Several comments noted that pernicious anemia 
    has an earlier age-at-onset among African-Americans than among 
    Caucasians, and that vitamin B12 deficiency is not rare in persons 
    with sickle cell anemia. Another comment noted that the level of folate 
    that will accelerate the neurologic disorders of vitamin B12 
    deficiency is unknown, and that physicians see patients who have been 
    taking folic acid supplements who present with neuropsychiatric 
    disturbances. Another comment noted that there were uncertainties 
    regarding effects of chronic exposures of children, whose requirements 
    for folate are lower than those of adults, to increased intakes of 
    folic acid. Uncertainties regarding safety of increased intakes of this 
    nutrient were the major factor in the opposition in the Folic Acid 
    Subcommittee/Food Advisory Committee to FDA's proposed rules (Ref. 8).
        Many comments agreed with FDA's estimate of 1 mg of folate as an 
    upper safe limit of intake given the paucity of information concerning 
    the possible risks of excess folate intakes. Other comments noted that 
    the masking of pernicious anemia is real, but that there is no evidence 
    for folate toxicity at daily intakes of 1 mg/day or less. The comments 
    said that the value of 1 mg/day has, therefore, emerged as being safe. 
    Other comments recognized that overconsumption of folate may complicate 
    the diagnosis of vitamin B12 deficiency, but that there is limited 
    evidence regarding effects of intakes of folic acid between 400 mcg and 
    5,000 mcg per day.
        FDA notes that a major factor in both the Folic Acid Subcommittee's 
    and the Food Advisory Committee's concern about FDA's proposals was the 
    fundamental issue of lack of documentation of safety of long-term daily 
    intakes at levels above 1,000 mcg (Ref. 8). The agency is also aware 
    that the Committee members expressed considerable concern about the 
    lack of information on the size of the population potentially at risk 
    from increased intakes of folate. Specifically, the agency did not 
    receive data regarding potential adverse effects of increased folate 
    intakes in African-American women or in children. The agency notes that 
    the absence of data on long-term effects of increased folate intakes 
    does not allow the agency to adequately identify those potentially at 
    risk.
        As stated above, the agency is not aware of any data that establish 
    the safety of long-term intakes of folate above 1,000 mcg per day. The 
    absence of any data that allow systematic evaluation of intakes above 
    this level means that potential risks and at-risk groups cannot be 
    adequately defined or described. FDA notes that some members of the 
    Folic Acid Subcommittee and most folate and vitamin B12 experts 
    submitting comments (Ref. 8) were concerned about the lack of 
    documentation of safety of daily long-term intakes of folate above the 
    level of 1 mg/day. In addition to concerns regarding those with low 
    vitamin B12 status, other safety concerns included uncertainties 
    of effects of increased folate intakes by young children and the 
    unknown physiological significance of circulating free folic acid in 
    the blood, particularly in pregnant women. In its proposed rule (58 FR 
    53254 at 53269), the agency summarized evidence from the scientific 
    literature that high levels of free folic acid are not normally found 
    in the circulation, and that folic acid is concentrated in crossing the 
    placenta and accumulates in fetal tissues. The agency also noted that 
    no information is available to ascertain whether developing neural 
    tissue is protected from the neurotoxic effects of very high 
    circulating levels of free folic acid. None of these issues were 
    addressed in comments that the agency received.
        Comments that disagreed with FDA's proposal to consider 1,000 mcg 
    folate/day as the safe upper limit of intake raised several issues 
    which are considered below:
        i. Basis for a safe upper limit: Synthetic folic acid versus total 
    folate.
        24. A comment stated that the limit should be based on supplemental 
    synthetic folic acid only because only this form has been associated 
    with masking of the anemia of pernicious anemia. This issue of whether 
    the upper limit should be based on total folate or on synthetic 
    crystalline folic acid was raised in several comments, with some 
    comments of the opinion that it was appropriate to use estimated 
    consumption of folate from all sources in defining the safe upper limit 
    of intake and others recommending use of ``crystalline folic acid'' 
    only.
        The agency disagrees that the safe upper limit of daily intake 
    should be based on ``crystalline folic acid'' rather than total folate 
    from all sources. FDA notes that the distinction between ``synthetic 
    folic acid,'' referring only to crystalline folic acid, and ``folate,'' 
    referring only to naturally occurring food folates, with respect to the 
    1,000 mg/day estimate of safe daily intake, is an artificial one and is 
    not consistent with what is known about the nutritional 
    interrelatedness of a variety of folate vitamin forms in providing 
    coenzyme forms of the vitamin for meeting the body's needs for this 
    essential nutrient. Issues relating to ``folic acid'' versus ``folate'' 
    are discussed in response to comment 6 of this document.
        Metabolic needs for folate are met from body pools of reduced 
    coenzymes, regardless of whether these coenzymes are derived from 
    synthetic folic acid or from naturally occurring food folates. While it 
    is true that evidence relative to the masking of the anemia of vitamin 
    B12 deficiency has been obtained from persons who consumed or were 
    treated with synthetic folic acid, such individuals were also consuming 
    unknown quantities of folate from foods. Thus, total daily folate 
    exposures associated with the masking have not been quantified, and the 
    effect of food folates on adverse effects is not known. It is also not 
    known whether the variable responses, in terms of masking effects, to 
    low levels of folic acid in supplements are the result of differences 
    in folate intakes from background diets or of other factors that are 
    currently not understood. For these reasons, it is not possible to 
    attribute all adverse effects solely to crystalline folic acid.
        In addition, high intakes of food folates can have adverse effects 
    in persons with poor vitamin B12 status. With respect to 
    nonpernicious anemia-related vitamin B12 deficiency, Sanders and 
    Reddy (Ref. 27) noted that megaloblastic anemia is rarely encountered 
    in Caucasian vegetarians and vegans because of their high intakes of 
    folate. These authors reported that, for example, the folate content of 
    diets of vegan children aged 6 to 13 years was twice as high as that of 
    omnivorous children aged 7 to 12 years (Ref. 27). Because the high 
    folate intakes would at least temporarily improve the associated 
    anemia, vitamin B12 deficiency usually presents with neurological 
    signs and symptoms in infants (Ref. 27). Herbert reported that studies 
    over several decades have all indicated that major myelin synthesis 
    damage from vitamin B12 deficiency with only minor hematopoietic 
    (i.e., hematologic) damage reflects better folate status because folate 
    improves hematologic, but not neurologic, manifestations of the 
    deficiency (Ref. 28). He also found generally higher red cell folate in 
    persons with greater myelin damage (that only vitamin B12 
    deficiency produces) than in persons with greater hematologic damage 
    (which deficiency of either folate or vitamin B12 produces) (Ref. 
    28).
        The observations above suggest that a safe upper limit of daily 
    intake is more 
    
    [[Page 8768]]
    accurately based on total folate intake than on just intake of 
    crystalline folic acid because under conditions in which vitamin 
    B12 utilization or intake is limited (i.e., in pernicious anemia 
    or in nonpernicious anemia-related vitamin B12 deficiency), either 
    crystalline folic acid or food folate may cause adverse effects when 
    consumed in excess.
        The agency noted in response to comment 6 of this document, that 
    use of a distinction between ``folic acid'' and ``folate'' is 
    inconsistent with the PHS recommendation, which uses these terms 
    interchangeably (Ref. 5), and with advice provided by FDA's and CDC's 
    advisory panels. Moreover, use of such a distinction is not supported 
    by recent statements from experts on folate and vitamin B12 (Refs. 
    7, 8, and 26). Therefore, the agency concludes that the safe upper 
    limit of daily intake should be based on total folate intake (i.e., on 
    consumption of folate from all sources).
        ii. Lack of evidence of untoward effects of increased intakes.
        25. Several comments that disagreed with the agency's tentative 
    conclusion that 1 mg folate per day from all sources is the safe upper 
    limit of intake stated that there is no evidence that maximum intakes 
    of 1,500 mcg to 2,000 mcg will result in any untoward effects. Another 
    comment reviewed the literature describing the effects of intakes of 
    1,000 to 5,000 mcg folic acid per day in persons with vitamin B12 
    deficiency and concluded that the literature did not reveal any 
    substantial safety concerns. Another comment stated that 5,000 mcg/day 
    should replace 1,000 mcg/day as the upper limit of safe intake.
        The agency is aware that the literature describing the effects of 
    intakes of folic acid between 1,000 and 5,000 mcg per day is very 
    limited but disagrees that there is no evidence of untoward effects of 
    daily folate intakes of 1,500 to 2,000 mcg per day, and that 5,000 mcg 
    per day should be identified as the safe upper limit of intake.
        The literature describing the effects of daily intakes of 1,000 to 
    5,000 mcg folic acid includes three uncontrolled intervention trials 
    involving 15 persons (Refs. 29, 30, and 31) and 16 case reports (Refs. 
    32, 33, 34, 35, 36, and 37). These reports represent a very small data 
    base, with information from a total of only 31 individuals. Moreover, 
    the agency notes that, among these data, exposures of 9 individuals to 
    daily intakes of 1,000 to 5,000 mcg folic acid lasted for less than 30 
    days (e.g., Refs. 30, 31, 32, and 33). Therefore, these reports are not 
    useful in assessing the safety of life-long exposures. However, 
    hematological responses that could lead to a delay in the diagnosis of 
    vitamin B12 deficiency were observed in 9 of the 16 patients 
    (i.e., in more than 50 percent) whose daily oral intakes of folic acid 
    were in the range of 1,000 to 5,000 mcg and continued for 1 month or 
    more (Refs. 29, 32, 33, 35, and 37). Thus, the limited scientific 
    literature shows that approximately half of the patients with 
    pernicious anemia associated with vitamin B12 deficiency will 
    respond to folate at doses between 1,000 and 5,000 mcg per day when 
    they are given the vitamin for relatively short periods of time (e.g., 
    several months).
        In addition, in discussing safety issues in its proposed rule (58 
    FR 53254 at 53267), the agency noted that, although there was a lack of 
    systematic evaluation of the effect of folic acid on the anemia of 
    vitamin B12 deficiency at intakes of less than 5,000 mcg per day, 
    several case reports have described hematologic improvement in 
    pernicious anemia patients with doses of folic acid lower than 1,000 
    mcg/day (e.g., at 200 to 500 mcg/day; Refs. 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 64 
    through 65, and 72 through 74). Thus, adverse effects have been 
    reported at daily doses of less than 1,000 mcg, at doses of 1,000 to 
    5,000 mcg, and at doses greater than 5,000 mcg.
        iii. Lack of evidence of toxic effects of increased folate intakes 
    in pregnant women.
        26. Another comment that disagreed with the agency's tentative 
    conclusion noted that millions of pregnant women have taken prenatal 
    vitamins containing 1,000 mcg folic acid, that folic acid at dosages of 
    4,000 mcg per day has been extensively studied in pregnant women, and 
    that no toxic effects have been shown in healthy individuals.
        The agency disagrees with the comment that folic acid at doses of 
    4,000 mcg per day have been extensively studied in pregnant women and 
    are without toxic effects. The agency recognizes that pregnant women 
    take prenatal supplements which usually contain 800 mcg of folic acid, 
    and that such supplements have been in use for many years. FDA notes 
    that, while there is no evidence that 800 mcg of folic acid per day 
    (i.e., the RDA level for pregnant or lactating women) is unsafe for 
    this group, such dosages are usually taken only during the second and 
    third trimesters of pregnancy or during lactation to meet specific 
    nutritional needs for limited periods of time and are usually taken 
    under physician supervision. The Institute of Medicine in Nutrition 
    During Pregnancy stated that the safety of large doses of folic acid in 
    pregnant women has not been systematically determined (Ref. 43).
        The agency notes also that the comment that folic acid at doses of 
    4,000 mcg per day has been extensively studied in pregnant women, and 
    that such doses are without toxic effects, is not substantiated by the 
    scientific data. In the only study utilizing 4,000 mcg folic acid/day, 
    the Medical Research Council (MRC) trial, about 910 women took 
    supplements containing 4,000 mcg of folic acid from the time of 
    randomization into the trial until the 12th week of pregnancy (Ref. 
    14). At the conclusion of the study, the author stated that, although 
    the MRC trial had sufficient statistical power to demonstrate the 
    efficacy of the intervention, it did not have sufficient power to 
    answer the question of safety for public health purposes. Consequently, 
    this study does not provide a basis on which to determine whether the 
    use of 4,000 mcg/day of folic acid by pregnant women is safe.
        Thus, the agency has not received any data or information that 
    would persuade it that any level other than 1 mg (1,000 mcg) folate per 
    day is the appropriate safe upper limit of intake for pregnant women.
        iv. Adverse effects in those with vitamin B12 deficiency can 
    be detected with clinical care.
        27. Another comment disagreed with the proposed 1,000 mcg safe 
    intake limit and noted that adverse effects of high intakes of folate 
    with respect to vitamin B12 deficiency can be detected with 
    clinical care. Other comments stated that the issue of masking of 
    vitamin B12 deficiency was overstated and predated modern clinical 
    nutrition.
        FDA is aware that, in many instances, the adverse effects of 
    increased folate intake associated with the masking of the anemia of 
    vitamin B12 deficiency can be detected with clinical care but 
    disagrees that this fact provides adequate justification for increasing 
    the safe limit of daily intake. The agency notes that measurements of 
    vitamin B12 status are not performed on a routine basis by 
    physicians. Currently, there are no population-based data on how many 
    people in the United States have undiagnosed vitamin B12 
    deficiency and thus might be at risk from increased intakes of folate. 
    The agency noted in the January 6, 1993 final rule (58 FR 2606 at 
    2615), that significant percentages of the elderly, demented patients, 
    acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) patients, and patients with 
    malignant diseases have subnormal vitamin B12 levels without 
    having any of the classical manifestations of vitamin B12 
    deficiency. Lindenbaum et al. recently reported that the prevalence of 
    vitamin B12 deficiency was greater than 
    
    [[Page 8769]]
    12 percent in a large study (n=548) of free-living elderly Americans 
    (Ref. 44). In addition, 5 to 10 percent of all patients, regardless of 
    age or clinical status, are found to have low serum vitamin B12 
    levels (58 FR 2606 at 2615). Little is known about whether folate 
    supplementation would have any adverse effect on such persons, who are 
    far more numerous in the U.S. population than are persons with 
    pernicious anemia.
        The argument that adverse effects in persons with vitamin B12-
    related problems can be identified with clinical care fails to consider 
    whether such persons, who may be unaware of their vitamin B12 
    status, would recognize an adverse effect as being the result of 
    increased folate intake, and whether they would seek medical attention 
    if subtle adverse effects were experienced. Thus, the agency concludes 
    that the argument that adverse effects in persons with vitamin 
    B12-related problems can be identified with clinical care does not 
    provide a sufficient basis for increasing the safe upper limit of 
    intake for such persons or for other persons in the general population 
    for whom there are currently no data to establish the effects, if any, 
    of high intakes of folate. In developing its proposed rule,
        FDA was aware of the contentious nature of a proposed upper limit 
    and specifically asked for data on this issue. This topic was also 
    extensively discussed by FDA's Folic Acid Advisory Committee and Food 
    Advisory Committee (Refs. 7 and 8). No data were submitted in any of 
    the comments that addressed the issue of the safety of intakes above 
    1,000 mcg per day either for persons in the general population or for 
    any of the groups identified as potentially at risk from increased 
    folate intakes. The agency also notes that its position regarding use 
    of 1,000 mcg folate per day as the safe upper limit of daily intake was 
    supported by all comments from individuals with known expertise in 
    folate and vitamin B12 metabolism and related diseases.
        Because there are inadequate data and information on the safety of 
    consuming more than 1,000 mcg folate per day, the agency is unable to 
    conclude that there is a reasonable certainty of no harm to persons 
    consuming more than 1,000 mcg folate per day. In the absence of data on 
    high intakes of folate, the agency is unable to adequately define the 
    nature or magnitude of potential risk from increased folate intakes. At 
    this time, the agency has no data to support a conclusion of safe use 
    of folate above 1,000 mcg per day or data that would provide a basis 
    for a change from the proposed upper limit of 1,000 mcg per day to an 
    upper limit of 5,000 mcg per day. In addition, for the reasons 
    explained above, the agency has not been persuaded by the comments that 
    it should consider synthetic folic acid as the only active form of the 
    vitamin and thus base its estimate of a safe upper limit of intake on 
    this form of the vitamin only.
        The agency therefore concludes that, because of the lack of 
    evidence of safe use at intakes greater than 1,000 mcg folate daily, 
    and the potential for serious harm to some persons from such intakes, 
    daily intakes above 1,000 mcg by the general population should not be 
    encouraged.
        b. Including a safe upper limit of daily intake in the claim. In 
    recognition of comments and safety concerns discussed in its proposal, 
    FDA, in Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(G), proposed to require a statement on 
    fortified foods in conventional food form and on dietary supplements 
    that contain more than 25 percent of the RDI (i.e., more than 100 mcg 
    per reference amount customarily consumed or, for supplements, per 
    unit) about the maximum safe daily limit for folate consumption. The 
    agency proposed that such a statement (e.g., ``Folate consumption 
    should be limited to 1,000 mcg per day from all sources.'') was 
    necessary to prevent the health claim from being misleading regarding 
    potential risks from excessive intakes.
        In the October 14, 1993 proposal (58 FR 53254 at 53282), the 
    agency, noting that the safe upper limit of intake was 1 mg (1,000 
    mcg), stated that a fortified food that contains more than 100 mcg 
    folate per serving contributes more than 25 percent of the RDI and more 
    than 10 percent of the daily limit. Therefore, it continued, 
    consumption of such foods should be monitored by the consumer, so that 
    he or she will not consistently or significantly exceed the upper 
    limit.
        In its proposed rule (58 FR 53254 at 53282), the agency also noted 
    that it was not proposing to require that this statement be included in 
    claims on the relatively small number of conventional foods that 
    contain more than 100 mcg of folate without fortification (e.g., dark 
    green leafy vegetables, certain legumes). The agency stated that it 
    believed that there is no need for the consumer to monitor intakes of 
    these foods because their folate content consists of reduced 
    pteroylpolyglutamates whose bioavailability is generally considered 
    lower than that of the folic acid (i.e., pteroylmonoglutamate) added as 
    a fortificant to foods. The agency received many comments on this 
    aspect of the proposal.
        c. General comments.
        28. Comments supporting inclusion of a caution statement in health 
    claims stated that an admonition regarding excessively high intakes is 
    absolutely essential in the health claim, and that the agency must 
    require a meaningful and useful disclosure regarding the risks of 
    excess intake. One comment stated more specifically that health claims 
    related to folate and neural tube defects should be balanced by a 
    warning statement that increased intakes of folate may increase the 
    frequency of irreversible neurologic damage from vitamin B12 
    deficiency. A related comment stated that, among Black and Hispanic 
    females, folic acid fortification or supplementation is likely to do 
    more harm than good, and that a caution statement was important for 
    such groups. One comment recognized the need to set upper limits of 
    safe intake but noted that, in the absence of strong evidence, it is 
    inappropriate to warn consumers about potential adverse effects and 
    detract from the benefits of the health claim.
        Other comments supported the use of a statement of a safe upper 
    limit of intake but found FDA's proposed language in 
    Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(G) and in the model health claims (Sec. 101.79(d)) 
    unsatisfactory because the agency failed to provide specific 
    information on the potential adverse effects of overconsumption and 
    failed to identify the subpopulations at risk from high intakes (e.g., 
    the elderly).
        The agency does not agree that it is inappropriate to warn 
    consumers about the potential adverse effects of increased folate 
    intake because adverse effects have been documented in the scientific 
    literature. The agency's responses to comments 23, 25, and 27 of this 
    document make clear that, for some population groups, there are risks 
    attendant upon increased folate intake. Such groups include those with 
    vitamin B12 deficiency and African-American women. As noted above, 
    the agency did not receive data providing evidence rebutting the risks 
    of folate intakes above 1 mg per day (1,000 mcg/day) for these and 
    other at-risk groups, such as pregnant women, children, persons on 
    antiseizure medications, or persons on antifolate medications.
        Therefore, the agency agrees with the comments that stated that it 
    should require that a useful statement regarding risks of excessive 
    intakes be included in the health claim. In response to the comment 
    that the model health claims were unsatisfactory because they failed to 
    identify specific subpopulations at risk from increased intakes (e.g., 
    the elderly), the agency is advising that it will not require 
    identification of specific 
    
    [[Page 8770]]
    at-risk groups in the caution statement because the limited data 
    available from populations consuming folate at the level of 1 mg per 
    day (1,000 mcg per day) and above do not allow an adequate 
    identification of all such groups to be made. Identification in the 
    claim of only some of the groups at risk (e.g., the elderly) would be 
    misleading because persons in other at-risk groups that were not 
    identified in the claim could conclude that because they were not 
    mentioned, they were not at risk from high intakes.
        d. Inappropriate to include caution statement only on fortified 
    foods and supplements.
        29. Other comments stated that it was inappropriate to single out 
    only fortified foods or supplements that contain folate above 25 
    percent of the DV for carrying a warning statement.
        The agency proposed not to require the caution statement in health 
    claims on the relatively small number of conventional foods that 
    contain more than 100 mcg of folate without fortification (e.g., dark 
    green leafy vegetables, certain legumes) because many of these foods 
    are not consumed on a daily basis, and even when consumed regularly, 
    the bulk and energy value of such foods tends to limit their 
    consumption.
        The agency has reevaluated whether foods that are naturally high in 
    folate (e.g., those containing more than 25 percent of the DV) should 
    carry the caution statement proposed for fortified foods or supplements 
    containing more than 25 percent of the DV. The agency agrees with the 
    comment that it is inappropriate to single out fortified foods and 
    supplements for a caution statement because there is no justification 
    for distinguishing between added and naturally-occurring nutrients. 
    This decision is consistent with the agency's conclusion (see comment 
    23 of this document) that total folate intake from all sources needs to 
    be considered in arriving at a safe upper limit of daily intake. For 
    this reason, FDA has decided to require that the modified caution 
    statement described in comment 31 of this document appear on any 
    conventional food or dietary supplement that meets the criteria set out 
    in Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(F).
        e. Optional caution statement.
        30. Another comment advised the agency to permit the identification 
    of the 1,000 mcg per day limit as optional information.
        The agency rejects this comment. Given the point of the health 
    claim message, it is unlikely that an optional caution statement would 
    be included in most health claims. Therefore, most consumers would not 
    be alerted to the potential adverse effects of high levels of folate or 
    might assume that claim- bearing products without the caution statement 
    were safer than products that bore a claim that included the caution 
    statement. Consumption of products bearing the caution statement might 
    come to be associated with potential adverse effects, while consumption 
    of other products with an identical folate content that did not bear 
    the caution statement would not be associated with such potential 
    adverse effects. Because potential adverse effects are related to 
    increased intakes of folate from any source, it would be illogical for 
    the agency not to require the caution statement on all products that 
    carry the health claim and that meet the criteria for the caution 
    statement. Claims on products that meet the criteria and that fail to 
    carry the caution statement would be misleading because they would fail 
    to alert consumers to the material fact that there may be risks 
    attendant upon excessive folate intakes.
        f. Upper limit of safe intake expressed as percent DV.
        31. Another comment agreed with the use of a caution statement but 
    felt that the safe upper limit of intake should be expressed as percent 
    of the DV.
        The agency agrees with this comment because this method of 
    communicating the safe upper limit of intake will provide consistency 
    with the nutrition label, thereby enhancing the comprehensibility of 
    the information. The agency notes that, as stated in response to 
    comment 19 of this document and in the codified language in 
    Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(F), the upper limit of daily intake is to be 
    expressed in the claim as percent of the DV, with manufacturers having 
    the option of including the microgram equivalent in parentheses (e.g., 
    250 percent DV (1,000 mcg)).
        g. Limit caution statement to products with 100 percent DV.
        32. Several comments said that a warning statement should be 
    limited to higher-dose foods or dietary supplements (those containing 
    100 percent or more of the DV) unless further research and monitoring 
    demonstrate that the risks of increased folate intakes from lower-dose 
    foods or supplements are also significant. Other comments argued that 
    there is no need to include a warning statement and noted that 
    supplements and cereals with 100 percent of the DV have never carried 
    such awarning statement. Other comments expressed the opinion that the 
    warning statement would discourage increased consumption of folic acid 
    supplements.
        The agency has considered whether requiring that the caution 
    statement appear in claims on foods or dietary supplements that contain 
    more than 25 percent of the DV is too restrictive. The agency 
    recognizes that such a requirement would require that caution 
    statements appear as part of health claims on a wide range of products 
    that contain more than 100 mcg folate per serving (e.g., dietary 
    supplements, breakfast cereals) that have not previously carried such a 
    statement. The agency agrees with the comment that the result of such 
    caution statements could well be to discourage consumption of such 
    products. It was not the agency's intent to cause such a result because 
    breakfast cereals and dietary supplements have traditionally been 
    important sources of folate for consumers who use them. Additionally, 
    in the case of many dietary supplements, a statement regarding daily 
    consumption (e.g., ``consume one per day'') is already included in the 
    labeling and serves to inform consumers as to the appropriate daily 
    intake.
        The agency notes, however, that the health claim is intended to 
    encourage women to increase their intakes of folate, and that the claim 
    is likely to encourage some women to consume more of particular 
    products, particularly those bearing the claim that are very high in 
    folate, than they might otherwise consume. Thus, a caution statement 
    regarding excessive intakes is appropriate on foods that contain very 
    high levels of folate because the possibility is created by the claim 
    itself that some women will achieve high folate intakes.
        The agency has concluded that a statement about high consumption of 
    folate is necessary if a product contains more than 100 percent of the 
    DV (i.e., 400 mcg when labeled for use by adults and children 4 or more 
    years of age; 800 mcg when labeled for use by pregnant or lactating 
    women; 58 FR 2206 at 2213, January 6, 1993; Food Labeling; Reference 
    Daily Intakes and Daily Reference Values). Such an amount of folate 
    would exceed not only the DV's but the PHS recommended folate intake 
    for women of childbearing age. Thus, the caution statement is required 
    only on products that contain more than current recommended daily 
    intakes of folate per serving.
        The agency has redesignated proposed Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(G) as 
    Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(F) and has modified this provision to read that:
    
        Claims on foods that contain more than 100 percent of the Daily 
    Value (DV) (400 mcg) when labeled for use by adults and children 4 
    or more years of age, or 800 mcg 
    
    [[Page 8771]]
    when labeled for use by pregnant or lactating women) shall identify the 
    safe upper limit of daily intake with respect to the DV. The safe 
    upper limit of daily intake value of 1,000 mcg (1 mg) may be 
    included in parentheses.
    
        h. Upper limit useless without reference to intake goal.
        33. Other comments opposed including a reference to the upper limit 
    of 1,000 mcg per day in any health claim because, they argued, 
    consumers cannot determine their total daily intakes from all sources. 
    These comments noted that stating an upper limit was useless unless all 
    food types were labeled with their folate content. Another comment 
    opposing the inclusion of a warning statement on foods or supplements 
    containing more than 25 percent of the DV stated that inclusion of an 
    upper limit was problematic if reference was not made to the 400 mcg/
    day intake goal.
        The agency recognizes that there was an inconsistency in the way 
    that proposed Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(G) was worded in that the safe upper 
    limit of daily intake was expressed as 1,000 mcg rather than as a 
    percent of the DV. The agency has corrected this inconsistency, as 
    noted above in response to comment 32 of this document.
        The agency disagrees that inclusion of the 400 mcg intake goal is 
    necessary to make a caution statement understandable, and that a 
    caution statement is useless unless all foods are labeled with their 
    folate contents. The agency notes that diets that do not contain highly 
    fortified foods and dietary supplements rarely provide daily folate 
    intakes of more than 1,000 mcg. The likelihood of achieving daily 
    intakes exceeding 1,000 mcg arises from consumption of highly fortified 
    foods and dietary supplements, particularly those that contain more 
    than the DV per unit or per serving. Under current labeling 
    requirements, such foods and supplements must, or soon will have to, 
    carry nutrition labeling. The safe upper limit of daily intake will 
    thus appear on those products whose use provides the greatest potential 
    for contributing to overconsumption (e.g., highly fortified foods and 
    supplements whose label bears a health claim that explains a potential 
    benefit of increased consumption). The agency concludes that it is 
    necessary to require inclusion of the caution statement, with the safe 
    upper limit of daily intake expressed as percent of the DV (percent 
    DV), as part of the health claim on such products.
        The agency also notes that the availability of the health claim may 
    result in increased consumption of foods with high folate content that 
    carry the claim. The expression of the folate content as a percent of 
    the DV will help consumers who select a health claim-labeled food that 
    contains more than 100 percent of the DV and that is labeled with a 
    statement that folate intakes should be limited to 250 percent of the 
    DV, to recognize that the product provides more than the full amount of 
    the DV while still leaving a considerable allowance for consumption of 
    other foods of lower folate content. The percent DV labeling will also 
    allow a consumer who selects four health claim-labeled foods that each 
    contain more than 100 percent of the DV to quickly compute that these 
    four products alone will provide more than 400 percent of the DV, an 
    amount in excess of the safe upper limit of daily intake of 250 percent 
    of the DV. Thus, the agency does not believe that explicit reference to 
    the 400 mcg target intake goal is necessary to make the caution 
    statement understandable. The agency advises, however, that 
    manufacturers wishing to include reference to the 400 mcg intake goal 
    may do so (Sec. 101.79(c)(3)(iv)).
        i. Caution statement on all products with >25 percent DV.
        34. One comment interpreted the proposed regulation to mean that 
    the agency was proposing to require use of a caution statement on all 
    products with more than 100 mcg folate/serving, whether or not they 
    bore the health claim.
        This comment misunderstood the proposal. The agency advises that it 
    is requiring that the caution statement be used only on conventional 
    foods or dietary supplements that bear the folate/neural tube defects 
    health claim and that contain more than 100 percent of the DV (400 mcg 
    when labeled for use by the general population or 800 mcg when labeled 
    for use by pregnant or lactating women).
        j. Warnings on supplements without adequate vitamin B12.
        35. One comment suggested that the agency should require warnings 
    on supplements that do not provide amounts of vitamin B12 adequate to 
    provide protection from the potential problem in nearly all cases.
        This comment was based on the assumption that the greatest 
    potential for adverse effects of high folate intake is the masking of 
    the anemia of vitamin B12 deficiency, with continued progression 
    of neurologic damage, and that provision of oral vitamin B12 will 
    negate this concern. The comment did not provide data or information 
    identifying the amount of oral vitamin B12 that would protect 
    nearly all persons from masking of a vitamin B12 deficiency and, 
    thus, the level below which a warning statement would be required.
        The agency disagrees with this suggestion. The agency is aware that 
    very high doses of vitamin B12 (e.g., about 1 mg; 500 times the 
    RDI for this vitamin) without intrinsic factor (i.e., without the 
    protein factor necessary for the absorption of vitamin B12 and the 
    factor whose lack causes pernicious anemia) have provided adequate 
    treatment for some persons with pernicious anemia (Ref. 45). It has 
    been suggested, based in part on observations that some patients with 
    pernicious anemia can be maintained on oral vitamin B12, that high 
    doses of vitamin B12 be added to foods and dietary supplements 
    fortified with folic acid to reduce the potential for adverse effects 
    in persons with vitamin B12 deficiency.
        Several experts at a CDC meeting on surveillance for adverse 
    effects of increased intakes of folate (Ref. 26) commented on this 
    suggestion. One expert noted that in the presence of other nutrients 
    (e.g., vitamin C, thiamin, iron), vitamin B12 may be converted 
    into analogs, some of which may have antivitamin B12 activity.
        In the proposal of October 14, 1993 (58 FR 53254 at 53280), the 
    agency discussed the issue of whether high doses of vitamin B12 
    should be added to foods or supplements fortified with folic acid to 
    reduce the potential for adverse effects in persons with vitamin 
    B12 deficiency. The agency requested comments, specifically data, 
    on the appropriateness, potential effectiveness, and safety of such 
    fortification. The agency did not receive data or other information on 
    this issue.
        Given this lack of information, FDA finds no basis to require a 
    warning statement on supplements based on their content of vitamin 
    B12 because there are no data on the effects of various folate/
    vitamin B12 combinations on which to base a warning. In addition, 
    relating a caution statement only to the vitamin B12 content of a 
    product would fail to recognize the potential adverse effects of 
    increased folate intakes on other population groups, including, as 
    discussed above, pregnant women, children, those on antiepileptic 
    medications, and those on antifolate medications, because it would fail 
    to recognize that potential adverse effects of increased intakes are 
    not limited only to those with vitamin B12-related problems.
        Because data are not available that address for the general 
    population on the issue of simultaneous fortification of foods or 
    dietary supplements with both folate and vitamin B12, the agency 
    cannot establish a level of oral vitamin 
    
    [[Page 8772]]
    B12 that is sufficient to protect most persons with vitamin 
    B12-related problems from the adverse effects of increased intakes 
    of folate. In addition, questions regarding the appropriateness, 
    potential effectiveness, and safety of such an approach remain 
    unanswered. Vitamin B12 deficiency, including pernicious anemia, 
    is a serious condition, which, if untreated, can lead to irreversible 
    neurological damage. Regardless of the widespread availability of oral 
    vitamin B12 preparations, patients with pernicious anemia, and 
    others at risk of vitamin B12 deficiency, should be diagnosed, 
    treated, and monitored by a physician (Ref. 45).
    6. Multifactorial Nature of Neural Tube Defects
        The general requirements for health claims for conventional foods 
    (Sec. 101.14(d)(2)(iii)) provide that, where factors other than dietary 
    intake of the substance affect the relationship between the substance 
    and the disease or health-related condition, FDA may require that such 
    factors be addressed in the health claim. FDA has decided that health 
    claims on dietary supplements should be subject to the same requirement 
    (see 59 FR 395 at 425).
        It is well-recognized that neural tube defects have many causes, 
    some of which are not related to folate status. Genetic and 
    environmental factors contribute to the multifactorial nature of neural 
    tube defects. Environmental factors associated with neural tube defects 
    include, for example, maternal health, maternal family history of 
    neural tube defects, and maternal use of certain antiseizure 
    medications (see 58 FR 53254 at 53258 for references).
        FDA discussed the multifactorial nature of neural tube defects in 
    several sections of its proposed rule. In proposed Sec. 101.79(b)(1), 
    FDA discussed the fact that neural tube defects are caused by many 
    factors and also noted that a significant risk factor is a personal or 
    family history of a pregnancy affected by a neural tube defect. In 
    Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(D), FDA proposed to require that claims state that 
    neural tube defects have many causes, and that claims not imply that 
    folate intake is the only recognized risk factor for neural tube 
    defects. The agency included language to this effect in the agency's 
    proposed model claims (Sec. 101.79(d)).
        The agency received several general comments and new data in 
    response to the sections of the proposed codified language addressing 
    the multifactorial nature of neural tube defects.
        a. General comments.
        36. Several comments agreed that the claim should include 
    information on the multifactorial nature of neural tube defects to be 
    consistent with claims for other diet-disease relationships. These 
    comments asserted that the claims would be misleading if such 
    information were not included. Other comments disagreed that the 
    multifactorial nature of neural tube defects should be recognized in 
    the claim because, for example: (1) Folate is the most important risk 
    factor, or (2) there is no educational value in identifying the 
    multifactorial nature of the condition. Another comment stated that 
    only factors that can be controlled, or those on which women could take 
    action, should be included in the claim.
        FDA is in the process of reconsidering the need to include in 
    health claims the fact that the disease that is the subject of the 
    claim has many causes. In the January 1993 final rules on health 
    claims, FDA included this fact as a required element of the claim. 
    However, as discussed below, FDA has come to tentatively conclude, at 
    least in part in response to a petition from the National Food 
    Processors Association (Docket No. 94P-0390), that, at least for most 
    claims, a statement about their multifactorial etiology adds length to 
    the claim without conveying information that would directly affect the 
    dietary choices of the consumers.
        The agency is particularly concerned that manufacturers will be 
    disinclined to use unnecessarily lengthy health claims on food labels, 
    that additional verbiage may detract from the central consumer message 
    of the claim, and that, as a result, health claims will be infrequently 
    used, and the benefits of communicating information on diet-disease 
    relationships to consumers through such claims will not be realized.
        The issue of manufacturers' reluctance to use lengthy health claims 
    is particularly significant in the case of the folate/neural tube 
    defects health claim because this topic has received much less 
    attention than has been given to chronic illnesses such as 
    osteoporosis, heart disease, and cancer. The lower level of public 
    familiarity with this topic was confirmed in a recent survey conducted 
    for the March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation regarding knowledge and 
    practices of women of childbearing age in the United States with 
    respect to consumption of folic acid from supplements and breakfast 
    cereals (Ref. 53).
        During January and February 1995, the Gallup Organization conducted 
    for the March of Dimes a proportionate, stratified random-digit-dialed 
    telephone survey of a national sample of 2,010 women aged 18 to 45 
    years. The response rate was 50 percent. Estimates were statistically 
    weighted to reflect the total population of women aged 18 to 45 years 
    in the continental United States. In response to the question ``Have 
    you ever heard or read anything about folic acid?'', 52 percent of 
    women reported ever hearing of or reading about this nutrient. Of 
    these, 9 percent answered that folic acid helps to prevent birth 
    defects and 6 percent that folic acid helps to reduce the risk for 
    spina bifida; 45 percent were unable to recall what they had heard or 
    read. Fifteen percent of respondents reported having knowledge of the 
    PHS recommendation regarding the use of folic acid; 4 percent reported 
    that the recommendation was for prevention of birth defects and 1 
    percent, for the prevention of spina bifida (Ref. 52).
        Respondents were also asked ``From what you know, is there anything 
    a woman can do to reduce her risk of having a baby with birth 
    defects?'' A total of 88 percent of respondents reported that a woman 
    can help reduce the risk for having an infant with birth defects. The 
    most common responses about how to reduce risk were avoiding alcohol 
    and drugs (73 percent), and not smoking (63 percent); 1 percent of 
    women reported that folic acid could reduce risk.
        This study found that while most women interviewed recognized that 
    there were a number of factors that might affect their risk of having a 
    baby with a birth defect, there was a low level of awareness that 
    consumption of folate from supplements, breakfast cereals, and other 
    foods may specifically help to reduce their risk of a neural tube 
    defect-affected pregnancy.
        The results of the March of Dimes survey are consistent with recent 
    findings by FDA. As part of FDA's ongoing review of its regulations 
    governing health claims, the agency conducted six focus groups in May 
    and June 1995 to evaluate consumer understanding of health claim 
    messages. In a report on these focus groups, Levy (Ref. 54) noted that 
    while almost all participants were aware of health effects of fat, 
    calcium, and fruits and vegetables, very few had heard much about folic 
    acid. Participants appreciated information provided in the folate/
    neural tube defects model claims but considered it insufficient to 
    inform them as adequately as they wished to be informed.
        Thus, recently available information suggests that there is a low 
    level of awareness of the potential impact that 
    
    [[Page 8773]]
    increased folate intake may have on the risk of a serious type of birth 
    defect.
        The agency has concluded, based in part on the studies mentioned 
    above, that the need to provide a succinct health claim in this topic 
    area is very important. Succinctness in the claim will increase the 
    likelihood that firms will use it and thus will increase its 
    educational value. To facilitate the use of such a claim by 
    manufacturers, it needs to be no longer than necessary to convey the 
    central consumer message.
        With respect to the issue of whether explicit identification of the 
    multifactorial nature of neural tube defects is necessary to prevent 
    the folate/neural tube defects health claim from being misleading, the 
    agency notes that use of the term ``may reduce'' in the claim describes 
    the potential of folate to affect the risk of neural tube defects and 
    serves to reflect the multifactorial nature of this birth defect. In 
    addition, data obtained in the March of Dimes survey described above 
    indicate that many women already recognize that birth defects in 
    general may have many causes. The agency has therefore concluded that 
    explicit reference to ``may have many causes'' is redundant when 
    included with the phrase ``may reduce.''
        The agency has concluded that it is not necessary to include 
    explicit reference to the multifactorial nature of neural tube defects 
    in the claim.
        The agency notes, however, that the fact remains that neural tube 
    defects are multifactorial in nature. This fact is confirmed by new 
    data of which FDA has become aware and that are discussed in the 
    following section. Because of this fact, the claim must not imply that 
    folate intake is the only risk factor for these birth defects.
        Therefore, the agency is modifying Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(D) by 
    deleting the requirement that the claim state that neural tube defects 
    have many causes but is retaining the requirement that claims shall not 
    imply that folate intake is the only recognized risk factor for neural 
    tube defects.
        The agency is also advising that manufacturers who wish to do so 
    may include, on an optional basis, information in the claim on 
    additional risk factors for neural tube defects. Information that may 
    be included is described in Sec. 101.79(c)(3)(i).
        b. Data received in comments. 1. The agency received new data from 
    an Irish study that found that plasma levels of vitamin B12, as 
    well as folate, were independent risk factors for neural tube defects 
    (Ref. 51). These data were reviewed at the October 14 and 15, 1993, 
    meeting of the Folic Acid Subcommittee and are summarized here because 
    the agency did not have the data in sufficient time to include them in 
    its October 14, 1993, proposed rule. Kirke et al. (1993) (Ref. 51) 
    compared values for plasma folate, plasma vitamin B12, and red 
    blood cell folate in 81 women who had a neural tube defect-affected 
    pregnancy and 247 control women. Values for all three parameters were 
    significantly lower in case mothers than in control mothers. Plasma 
    vitamin B12 and red cell folate were both significantly positively 
    correlated in case mothers but not in control mothers. Multiple 
    regression analysis showed that plasma vitamin B12 and plasma 
    folate were independent predictors of red cell folate in case mothers 
    but not in control mothers.
        The authors concluded that plasma vitamin B12 and plasma 
    folate were independent risk factors for neural tube defects and 
    suggested that the enzyme methionine synthetase was involved directly 
    or indirectly in the etiology of neural tube defects. They noted that 
    the correlation between plasma vitamin B12 and red cell folate, 
    observed in case mothers only, was difficult to explain on a purely 
    nutritional basis and favored the etiology of neural tube defects as 
    being the result of some metabolic abnormality in the mother, and 
    possibly in the embryo, interacting with maternal plasma levels of 
    folate and vitamin B12 (Ref. 50).
        Mooij et al. (Ref. 46) measured levels of seven vitamins in blood 
    of women who had a neural tube defect-affected pregnancy and reported 
    that such measurements were not suitable for identifying women at high 
    risk of another affected pregnancy. The authors hypothesized that the 
    effect of folic acid was attributable, at least in part, to its 
    overriding a metabolic disorder.
        2. The agency received additional new data in a comment relating to 
    a possible role of a deficiency of one or more antioxidant enzymes in 
    the development of neural tube defects. The comment discussed the 
    hypothesis that a genetic defect in antioxidant enzyme systems that 
    protect neuronal membranes from excessive lipid peroxidation may play a 
    role in the etiology of neural tube defects. The comment noted that 
    abnormalities of the neural tube have been documented in cultured rat 
    embryos exposed to oxygen radicals generated in vitro by xanthine plus 
    xanthine oxidase. The severity of these abnormalities, which increases 
    in a dose-responsive manner with exposure to xanthine oxidase, can be 
    moderated by substances with known antioxidant activity such as 
    glutathione, catalase, L-ascorbic acid (vitamin C), or DL-alpha 
    tocopherol (vitamin E).
        This comment provided the results of a pilot study that tested the 
    hypotheses in children with neural tube defects and their immediate 
    families. In testing the hypothesis, the investigators assessed a 
    number of red blood cell free radical- scavenging enzymes in eight 
    families with one or more children with the neural tube defect 
    meningomyelocele. Seventeen healthy adults without a history of neural 
    tube defects served as controls. All meningomyelocele-affected children 
    were found to be deficient in red blood cell glutathione peroxidase, 
    with 5 in the range of moderately to severely deficient. At least one 
    parent of seven of the eight affected children was deficient in red 
    blood cell glutathione peroxidase activity, with four of seven in the 
    moderately to severely deficient range. Nine additional children with 
    meningomyelocele or other neural tube defects (specifically, 
    encephalocele and iniencephaly) were also studied. Red blood cell 
    glutathione peroxidase activities were low in all of the nine 
    additional affected children, with values in six of the nine in the 
    moderately to severely deficient range.
        The comment also noted that pterin aldehyde, a contaminant that may 
    be present at a level of about 4 percent in commercially available 
    folic acid preparations, may reduce exposure of the developing neural 
    tube to toxic oxygen free radicals through its activity in inhibiting 
    xanthine oxidase. The comment suggested (Comment 68H to docket 93N-
    100H) that a combination of genetic factors, deficient antioxidant 
    enzyme capacities, exogenous or endogenous teratogens, periconceptional 
    diets with inadequate amounts of free radical scavenging substances, or 
    suboptimal concentrations of pterin aldehyde-like agents may provide 
    further explanations for tissue-specific injury in some pregnancies.
        The comment concluded that, while the mechanisms of neural tube 
    defect formation likely fit into a complex ecogenetic model, a 
    deficiency of one or more antioxidant enzymes may increase the risk for 
    the development of neural tube defects. The comment recommended further 
    study to determine whether reduced antioxidant activity predisposes the 
    embryo to the development of neural tube defects.
        c. Data that were published after the close of the comment period. 
    1. Mills et al. (1995) (Ref. 47) reported that women with neural tube 
    defect-affected pregnancies had significantly higher levels of 
    homocysteine than did vitamin B12-matched controls. Mills et al. 
    (1995) 
    
    [[Page 8774]]
    (Ref. 47) noted that their study showed that an abnormality of 
    homocysteine metabolism, apparently related to methionine synthase, is 
    present in many pregnancies that resulted in neural tube defects.
        2. Mechanistic studies in cultured rat embryos have also provided 
    insights into roles for nutrients in addition to folate in the etiology 
    of neural tube defects. Chambers and coworkers identified 
    autoantibodies (i.e., antibodies directed against tissue components of 
    the same organism) to the extracellular basement membrane (i.e., the 
    noncellular layer underlying the epithelium) protein laminin as an 
    agent that caused neural tube defects in whole embryo cultures (see 
    Ref. 48 for additional references). Such antibodies were found 
    initially in the embryotoxic sera of monkeys with poor reproductive 
    histories. Chambers et al. (1995) (Ref. 48) recently reported that 
    methionine overcomes neural tube defects in rat embryos cultured on 
    sera from monkeys immunized against laminin. The authors noted that the 
    association of autoimmune diseases and fetal loss has received closer 
    attention in recent years, but that neither the mechanisms of fetal 
    loss nor treatments have been well defined (Ref. 48). The authors 
    suggested that epidemiologic studies are needed to establish a possible 
    role for autoantibodies in the etiology of neural tube defects and to 
    determine the efficacy of methionine supplementation in overcoming such 
    defects.
        3. Data addressing the etiologic heterogeneity of neural tube 
    defects were also derived from observations that infants and fetuses 
    with isolated neural tube defects have different risk factors than 
    those with neural tube defects occurring with other birth defects and 
    from reported differences in recurrence risks for neural tube defects 
    based on the level of the affected infant's defect (Ref. 49; Shaw et 
    al., 1994, for references). Shaw et al. (1994) (Ref. 49), used 
    population-based case ascertainment by the California Birth Defects 
    Monitoring Program in an ethnically diverse population of more than 
    700,000 live births and fetal deaths to investigate whether 
    heterogeneity existed among various anatomic and pathogenetic 
    subclasses of neural tube defects for a variety of commonly collected 
    child and parental characteristics. Among cases of anencephaly, 
    increased risks were found for Hispanic white women with risk estimates 
    highest for nonisolated cases. This population-based study showed 
    increased risk for Hispanic women specifically among subclassifications 
    of neural tube defects, and provides some evidence that further 
    classification of neural tube defects may reveal subgroupings of cases 
    with different etiologies.
        Shaw et al. (1995) (Ref. 50) used a case-control study design (549 
    cases and 540 controls) to investigate whether intake of supplemental 
    folic acid or dietary folate reduced the risk of a neural tube defect-
    affected pregnancy (Ref. 50). The authors found that women with any use 
    of a folic acid-containing vitamin in the 3 months prior to conception 
    had a lower risk of having an NTD-affected pregnancy. Odds ratios were 
    similar for average daily folic acid intakes of <400 mcg,="" 400="" to="" 900="" mcg,="" and="">900 mcg/day, and thus, no dose-response pattern was apparent. 
    Use of 400 to 900 mcg folic acid/day in the 3 months after conception 
    was also associated with reduced risk of a neural tube defect-affected 
    pregnancy. The authors also observed that women who did not begin using 
    a folic acid- containing vitamin until the second trimester of 
    pregnancy also had a reduced risk of neural tube defects and suggested 
    that although the finding may be indicative of errors in reporting 
    vitamin use in general, it also weakens the attribution of a direct 
    preventive effect of folate on neural tube defects in the study 
    population (Ref. 50).
        When race/ethnicity were considered, nonHispanic white women who 
    used a folic acid-containing vitamin in the 3 months before conception 
    had a reduced risk of a neural tube defect-affected pregnancy. However, 
    risk of a neural tube defect-affected pregnancy was not reduced in 
    Hispanic women who consumed a folic acid-containing vitamin in the 3 
    months before conception. The overall results of this study are 
    consistent with other studies showing associations between folate 
    intake and reduced risk of neural tube defects. However, the data also 
    suggest that the folate-associated reduction in risk may be specific to 
    subsets of the population, primarily nonHispanic women (Ref. 50).
        These recent studies are of significance for the insights that they 
    provide into understanding the multifactorial etiology of neural tube 
    defects. They support the hypothesis that neural tube defects are not 
    the result of a wide-spread nutritional deficiency of folate in the 
    U.S. population but may result from metabolic defects or other 
    physiologic conditions affecting a small part of the population. These 
    new data support FDA's decision to require that claims not imply that 
    folate intake is the only recognized risk factor for neural tube 
    defects.
    7. Prevalence Statements
        In Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(E), the agency proposed to require that the 
    claim provide information that neural tube defects ``while not 
    widespread, are extremely significant.'' Because the affected 
    population is few in number and not readily identifiable, FDA proposed 
    to require that this information be disclosed to prevent women from 
    being misled into believing that neural tube defects are very common 
    birth defects, or that, lacking a personal or family history of such 
    defects or other recognized risk factors, their risk of having a 
    pregnancy affected with such a birth defect is very high.
        37. The agency received a number of comments on the proposed 
    prevalence statement. Some comments stated that the wording ``while not 
    widespread'' was not clear, and one comment suggested use of 
    ``uncommon'' rather than ``while not widespread'' in describing the 
    prevalence of neural tube defects. One comment noted that statements 
    indicating that neural tube defects had a low prevalence in the United 
    States would discourage women from taking folic acid supplements 
    because women would believe that the health claim is not applicable to 
    them, and they would be misled into not taking the health claim 
    seriously. One comment noted that there is no standard for the proposed 
    term ``not widespread.'' One comment noted that because the behavior 
    intended to result from authorization of the health claim was to have 
    women consume more folic acid, qualifiers regarding prevalence of the 
    condition had no educational benefit. One comment, noting that 
    statements regarding the extent of the disease-related conditions were 
    optional in other approved health claims, and that the rarity of spina 
    bifida and related birth defects is obvious to virtually all consumers, 
    urged the agency to make prevalence statements optional in the folate/
    neural tube defect claim.
        The Folic Acid Subcommittee also commented on issues of prevalence 
    and demographics of neural tube defects at all of its meetings (e.g., 
    Ref. 8). The Folic Acid Subcommittee discussed the decline in the rate 
    of neural tube defects from a high in Boston in the 1930's of 5 per 
    1,000 births to the current overall U.S. rate of about 0.6 per 1,000 
    births (i.e., about 2,500 cases/year in the United States). In 
    addressing the prevalence of neural tube defects among different ethnic 
    groups, one Folic Acid Subcommittee member noted that African-American 
    women have a rate lower than the overall U.S. rate, while Mexican-
    American women have a rate 
    
    [[Page 8775]]
    about two and one-half times the national average. The participant also 
    noted that there is about a two- fold higher rate among women in lower 
    socio-economic groups than among those in higher socio-economic groups 
    (Ref. 8).
        The agency has reviewed the comments that it received and agrees 
    that use of the proposed wording ``while not widespread'' is not clear 
    because it is not quantitative. The agency notes that even though the 
    occurrence of neural tube defect-affected pregnancies is low, the 
    population at risk may be quite large because about half of pregnancies 
    are unplanned. Therefore, the agency concludes that a statement of 
    prevalence is not a material fact in light of the other statements made 
    in the claim. For this reason, the agency concludes that it is not 
    necessary to require that the claim state that the prevalence of neural 
    tube defects is low to ensure that the claim is not misleading. 
    Therefore, the agency is deleting the requirement proposed in 
    Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(E) and redesignating subsequent sections as 
    discussed below and as shown in the codified language.
        However, given the other comments cited above and its discussions 
    with the Folic Acid Subcommittee, the agency does not agree that there 
    would be no educational benefit from providing prevalence information 
    in the health claim. The agency concludes, based on the comments above, 
    that prevalence information can be useful to consumers because it can 
    provide a context that increases understanding of how frequently neural 
    tube defects actually occur among pregnancies in the U.S. population.
        The agency recognizes that it has provided for inclusion, on an 
    optional rather than required basis, in other authorized health claims 
    of information on the number of people in the United States who have 
    the health-related condition (e.g., see saturated fat and 
    cardiovascular disease claim and dietary fiber and cancer claims). 
    Thus, in response to the comments above, and consistent with other 
    authorized health claims, FDA, in Sec. 101.79(c)(3)(v), is authorizing 
    the use of optional statements to provide the estimated numbers on an 
    annual basis of neural tube defect births among live births to women in 
    the general U.S. population. Currently, this estimate is 0.6 cases per 
    1,000 live births, or 6 cases per 10,000 live births, or about 2,500 
    cases among 4 million live births, or about 1 case per 1,600 live 
    births. These estimates are based on information for the U.S. 
    population from PHS. FDA finds, based on a review of how such 
    statistics are generally presented, that expressing this information as 
    the estimated annual number of neural tube defects per a specified 
    number of births (e.g., per 1,000 live births or per 10,000 live 
    births) will help to make this information as useful as possible. 
    Section 101.79(c)(3)(v) provides for use of these estimates unless more 
    current estimates from PHS become available, in which case, the newer 
    estimates may be used.
    8. Quantifying Risk Reduction
        In Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(F), the agency proposed that the claim 
    contain a statement that some women may reduce their risk of a neural 
    tube defect-affected pregnancy by maintaining adequate folate intake 
    during their childbearing years. Such a statement is consistent with 
    the estimate provided in the PHS recommendation that about half of 
    neural tube defects (i.e., about 1,250 annually) might be averted if 
    all women of childbearing age in the United States who are capable of 
    becoming pregnant consumed 0.4 mg of folate daily throughout their 
    childbearing years. FDA tentatively concluded that such a statement is 
    necessary to ensure that women do not conclude on the basis of the 
    claim that adequate intake of folate will prevent all occurrences of 
    neural tube defects. The agency also proposed in 
    Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(F) that the claim not attribute any specific 
    degree of reduction in risk of neural tube defects to maintaining an 
    adequate folate intake throughout the childbearing years.
        38. Several comments agreed with the agency that a specific degree 
    of reduction in risk should not be stated in the health claim. Other 
    comments noted that while occurrence of neural tube defects will be 
    averted by only some women, the risk of occurrence will be reduced for 
    the population. Other comments objected to the proposal to prohibit use 
    of the PHS estimated percent risk reduction of 50 percent. Some 
    comments argued that the 50 percent estimate should be stated because 
    it was a scientific finding, and that failure to include this estimate 
    could have a negative effect on how much effort women make to ensure 
    that they have adequate folate intake. Another comment stated that the 
    estimate of 50 percent reduction should be included because it is 
    preferable for women to know the exact benefit of folic acid rather 
    than to be informed that ``some but not all women may benefit.''
        The agency disagrees with comments that the PHS estimate of 50 
    percent is a scientific finding and represents an exact benefit 
    achievable by all women who consume adequate folate daily throughout 
    their childbearing years. The PHS recommendation states that the 50 
    percent estimate was derived from studies that associated recalled use 
    of folic acid-containing multivitamins with reduced risk of neural tube 
    defect-affected pregnancies and states that ``the protective effect 
    found in the studies of lower-dose folic acid, measured by the 
    reduction in neural tube defect incidence, ranged from none to 
    substantial'' (Ref. 5) (emphasis added). The PHS recommendation also 
    noted that:
    
        It is expected that consumption of adequate folic acid will 
    avert some, but not all, neural tube defects. The underlying causes 
    of neural tube defects are not known. Thus, it is not known what 
    proportion of neural tube defects will be averted by adequate folic 
    acid consumption. From the available evidence, CDC estimates that 
    there is the potential for averting 50 percent of cases that now 
    occur. However, until further research is done, no firm estimate of 
    this proportion will be available (Ref. 5).
    
        The agency also notes that there may be minimal or no effect of 
    periconceptional use of folate in areas of low prevalence or in areas 
    where other factors are contributing to an increased prevalence. This 
    observation is consistent with scientific evidence that shows that, in 
    an area of low prevalence in the United States, women who consumed 
    folate from multivitamins or fortified breakfast cereals did not have a 
    lower risk of having a neural tube defect-affected pregnancy than did 
    women who did not consume multivitamins or fortified breakfast cereals 
    (Ref. 12; Mills et al.).
        Thus, the estimate of a potential for a 50 percent reduction in 
    neural tube defect-affected pregnancies, if all women consumed adequate 
    folate throughout their childbearing years, is not a scientific finding 
    and may not be applicable to estimating potential risk reduction in 
    areas of low prevalence. The agency notes further that the estimate of 
    50 percent is not applicable to risk reduction that might be 
    experienced by individual women, whose personal risk factors are not 
    fully understood. In addition, the estimated proportion may change with 
    the availability of new scientific data and information. The agency 
    recognizes, however, that manufacturers may wish to use the PHS 
    recommendation, including the estimate of the potential for a 50 
    percent reduction in the incidence of neural tube defects, as labeling 
    for folate-containing products. The agency also notes that there is 
    considerable potential for making a misleading claim if such 
    information is not presented in an accurate context. 
    
    [[Page 8776]]
    
        The agency has concluded that an estimate of potential risk 
    reduction can be included in the health claim because it may help some 
    consumers better understand the potential population-based impact on 
    neural tube defect-affected pregnancies if all women consumed adequate 
    folate throughout their childbearing years. Therefore, FDA is providing 
    in Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(E) that population-based estimates of risk 
    reduction may be included in the claim so long as the claim makes clear 
    that the estimate does not reflect risk reduction that may be 
    experienced by individual women. Provision of such information will 
    reduce the likelihood of women being misled that adequate folate intake 
    will prevent an occurrence of a neural tube defect-affected pregnancy.
        The agency has revised Sec. 101.79(b)(3) to provide information 
    from the PHS recommendation that explains how the estimate of a 
    potential for reduction in incidence of neural tube defects of 50 
    percent was derived and provides the context in which the estimate can 
    be understood by individual women.
        FDA has also redesignated proposed Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(F) as 
    Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(E) and revised this section to remove the 
    prohibition against use of the PHS estimate. Section 101.79(c)(2)(i)(E) 
    includes reference to new Sec. 101.79(c)(3)(vi) which provides for 
    optional inclusion of statements about population-based estimates of 
    risk reduction. The requirement that claims state that some women may 
    reduce their risk of a neural tube defect-affected pregnancy through 
    adequate intake of folate throughout their childbearing years is 
    retained in Sec. 101.79(c)(2)(i)(E).
        New Sec. 101.79(c)(3)(vi) states that an estimate of the reduction 
    in the number of neural tube defect-affected births that might occur in 
    the United States if all women consumed adequate folate throughout the 
    childbearing years (i.e., 50 percent) may be included in the claim if 
    such an estimate is accompanied by information that states that it is a 
    population-based estimate and does not reflect reduction in risk that 
    may be experienced by individual women. New Sec. 101.79(c)(3)(vi) also 
    provides for use in the claim of information in revised 
    Sec. 101.79(b)(3).
    9. Optional Health Claim Information
        In Sec. 101.79(c)(3)(i), the agency proposed to permit 
    manufacturers, in addition to including the fact that neural tube 
    defects have many causes, to specifically identify risk factors for 
    neural tube defects. The agency stated that specific examples of other 
    risk factors include a personal history of such a defect, maternal 
    diabetes mellitus, use of the antiepileptic drug valproic acid, 
    maternal febrile illness, or a close relative with a neural tube defect 
    (Sec. 101.79(b)(1) and (b)(2)). The agency requested comments on 
    whether such additional information would be useful to consumers.
        a. Identifying other risk factors.
        39. Some comments expressed the opinion that most of the optional 
    information was helpful, while others stated that there was no 
    educational value in identifying the multifactorial nature of neural 
    tube defects, and that women cannot control other risk factors.
        The agency disagrees with the comments that stated that 
    identification of other risk factors would not be helpful to women. 
    Certain conditions, such as diabetes mellitus, are known to increase a 
    woman's risk of a neural tube defect-affected pregnancy. Identification 
    of these risks in the claim may serve to alert some women to their 
    higher risk and encourage them to seek advice from their health care 
    providers before becoming pregnant.
        The agency is providing in Sec. 101.79(c)(3)(i) for the inclusion 
    of optional information in the claim. Information in Sec. 101.79(b)(1) 
    or (b)(2) or drawn from other parts of Sec. 101.79(c)(3) may be 
    included in the claim. Use by manufacturers of factors listed in the 
    regulation will ensure that claims will only include scientifically-
    based information and will not include information that has not been 
    well- documented (e.g., ``Birth defects of the brain or spinal cord may 
    have many causes, such as exposure to pesticides * * *'').
        b. Consult a physician. In Sec. 101.79(c)(3)(iii), the agency 
    proposed that a claim could include a statement that women with a 
    history of a neural tube defect pregnancy should consult their 
    physicians or health care providers before becoming pregnant. The 
    agency tentatively concluded that such a statement would encourage such 
    women to obtain medical guidance and thereby decrease their risk of a 
    recurrence of a neural tube defect- affected pregnancy. The available 
    data show that women with a history of a neural tube defect-affected 
    pregnancy are at very high risk of another affected pregnancy (e.g., 
    risk of a recurrence of a neural tube defect pregnancy is significantly 
    greater than risk of an occurrence of this birth defect). The agency 
    requested comments on whether provision of such information would be 
    helpful to consumers.
        40. The agency received several comments on this proposed optional 
    information. All comments that addressed this issue recommended that it 
    be broadened to include all women rather than only those with a 
    personal history of a neural tube defect- affected pregnancy. Comments 
    stated that prenatal care was critical for all women and suggested that 
    health claims should include a statement that all women planning a 
    pregnancy should consult a physician or health care provider for 
    information about adequate diets for their and their babies' health. 
    Several comments suggested that such a statement be mandatory rather 
    than optional.
        FDA does not believe that it is appropriate, in general, for health 
    claims to bear statements concerning the need to seek medical advice 
    for treating the disease or health-related condition mentioned in the 
    claim. The agency is concerned that the appearance of a statement 
    concerning the treatment of a disease on the label of a food could 
    mislead some consumers to believe that the food possesses therapeutic 
    value for an existing disease or health-related condition (58 FR 2478 
    at 2514).
        The agency originally proposed such a statement regarding women at 
    recurrent risk of a neural tube defect-affected pregnancy because their 
    risk of recurrence is very high, and because a specific recommendation 
    from PHS has been made to such women when they are planning a pregnancy 
    (i.e., they are advised to take 4 mg folic acid daily under a 
    physician's supervision; Ref. 52).
        Because all comments favored broadening the advice to include all 
    women, and because the agency recognizes that it is important for all 
    women to consult a health care provider before becoming pregnant, the 
    agency is persuaded to modify Sec. 101.79(c)(3)(iii) as suggested in 
    the comments and to provide for claims to include, in addition to a 
    statement regarding women at recurrent risk of a neural tube defect, a 
    statement that all women should consult a health care provider before 
    becoming pregnant (e.g., ``Women, including those with a history of a 
    neural tube defect pregnancy, should consult their health care provider 
    when planning a pregnancy.'').
        However, because the length of claims has been consistently a 
    concern of the comments, the agency is not persuaded that the 
    information provided for in Sec. 101.79(c)(3)(iii) should be required 
    in all health claims, as suggested by one comment above. 10. Model 
    Health Claims
        FDA provided several model claims in the proposal that contained 
    the elements described in its proposal. The agency included these model 
    claims to 
    
    [[Page 8777]]
    assist manufacturers in formulating appropriate claims.
        a. Toll-free number, pregnancy information symbol.
        41. Several comments stated that less detailed model claims were 
    needed and proposed that the agency establish a toll-free 800 number 
    through which women could obtain more information or recommended that 
    the agency devise a uniform pregnancy information symbol for food 
    labels that would alert women to look for products that bear the 
    symbol.
        The agency agrees that educational information is of great 
    importance in increasing awareness among women of the need for adequate 
    nutrition, including adequate folate intake, during their childbearing 
    years. The agency is considering how best to evaluate consumer 
    understanding of the health claim and is working with other PHS 
    agencies to develop strategies to implement the PHS recommendation on 
    folate intake.
        With respect to the use of a pregnancy information symbol, the 
    agency noted above that many pregnancies are unplanned, and for this 
    reason, women need to be informed of the need for adequate nutrition 
    throughout their childbearing years. While a pregnancy symbol might 
    draw the attention of women who are already pregnant or who might be 
    planning a pregnancy, it may not be helpful to women whose pregnancies 
    are unplanned or to women whose pregnancies are too far advanced for 
    folate intake to alter their risk of giving birth to a neural tube 
    defect-affected infant. Such a symbol may also discourage other women 
    from using the product because they do not think they will become 
    pregnant.
        The agency also notes that many of the foods that will bear the 
    health claim will be consumed by the general population, and the 
    appearance of a pregnancy symbol on the label might be incorrectly 
    interpreted by some consumers to mean that the product is specifically 
    intended for use in pregnancy.
        For these reasons, the agency is not persuaded to use a pregnancy 
    symbol with the health claim.
        b. General comments.
        42. Many comments criticized the length of the model claims and 
    their required components. Comments stated that the model messages were 
    too lengthy and complex and unwieldy, and that therefore manufacturers 
    would be disinclined to use them. Other comments noted that the claims 
    included unnecessary disclosures and requested that FDA remove the 
    requirements relating to the multifactorial nature of neural tube 
    defects, sources of folate other than dietary supplements, and the 
    caution statement. Several comments, stating that the model claims were 
    overly focused on foods, urged the agency to develop a condensed claim 
    for dietary supplements and suggested that such a claim should not need 
    to identify other sources of folate or state a maximum daily limit on 
    intake.
        Another comment noted that in formulating the claim, the agency 
    should be guided by the need to communicate the benefits of increased 
    folate intake from food sources or dietary supplements, and that the 
    message must also convey proper cautions, including the fact that 
    increased folate intake will not prevent all birth defects or even all 
    neural tube defects. Several comments praised portions of the model 
    claims that required disclosure of the multifactorial nature of neural 
    tube defects and the inclusion of information regarding sources of 
    folate. One comment recommended that claims use the information in the 
    PHS recommendation, including the warning statement, as closely as 
    possible. Several comments noted that the model claims were not 
    educationally strong enough, while others recognized the problem of 
    providing the guidance that needs to be included in the claim without 
    having the claim become so long as to be unusable. Some comments 
    provided examples of shorter claims that they proposed as more 
    appropriate than the agency's model claims.
        As discussed in the proposal and elsewhere in this final rule, 
    certain information is needed in the health claim, whether for 
    conventional foods or for dietary supplements, for such claims to be 
    truthful, scientifically valid, and not misleading to segments of the 
    population that are not at high risk of having a neural tube defect-
    affected pregnancy or for whom no link between folate intake and risk 
    of neural tube defect-affected pregnancies has been established.
        The agency has addressed the issues of mandatory requirements 
    relating to the multifactorial nature of neural tube defects, sources 
    of folate other than dietary supplements, and the caution statement in 
    response to comments 36, 21, and 32, respectively. The agency disagrees 
    that all of these elements should be removed. Specifically, the agency 
    has discussed in response to comment 36 why claims shall not imply that 
    folate intake is the only risk factor for neural tube defects. In 
    response to comments 28 through 34, the agency explained why a caution 
    statement is necessary, as well as its reasoning in limiting the 
    requirement for such a statement to very narrow circumstances. The 
    agency in response to comments has dropped the requirement that sources 
    of folate be identified in the claim and instead has provided for 
    optional inclusion of such information.
        The agency also disagrees that its proposed model claims were 
    overly focused on foods because each of the proposed claims 
    specifically identified sources of folate as fruits, vegetables, whole 
    grain products, fortified cereals, and dietary supplements.
        The agency rejects the comments that urged it to develop a 
    condensed claim for dietary supplements and not identify a safe upper 
    limit of daily intake. Throughout its responses to the comments it 
    received, the agency has been even-handed in considering conventional 
    foods and dietary supplements (comments 29 and 32, above). Since 
    increased folate intake is what is of importance, and since a variety 
    of dietary sources of folate are available, it would be inconsistent 
    with the available evidence for the agency to set different 
    requirements for claims on dietary supplements than for claims on 
    conventional foods.
        Thus, the agency, in developing this final rule, has been guided by 
    the need to communicate the effects on the risk of neural tube defects 
    of increased folate intake while providing sufficient cautions to 
    prevent claims from being misleading and to ensure that they are 
    scientifically valid.
        FDA has modified the model claims to reflect the changes that it 
    has made in Sec. 101.79 in response to the comments. The agency has 
    sought to illustrate in the model claims that it is possible to fully 
    comply with Sec. 101.79 and still produce a claim that uses less than 
    30 words (see Examples 1 and 2 in Sec. 101.79(d)). The agency also 
    notes that in response to the petition from the National Food 
    Processors Association, mentioned above, it is exploring the 
    possibility of permitting a shortened version of the claim to appear on 
    the front panel of the food label as long as the full claim appears on 
    the label. FDA is considering how this can be accomplished while still 
    ensuring that there is full compliance with section 403 (a) and (r) of 
    the act. FDA anticipates publishing a proposal on these matters in the 
    near future.
    
    III. Environmental Impact
    
        The agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.24(a)(11) that this 
    action is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a 
    significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, 
    
    [[Page 8778]]
    neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact 
    statement is required.
    
    IV. Economic Impact
    
        FDA has examined the impacts of this final rule to authorize the 
    use on the labels and in the labeling of conventional food and dietary 
    supplements of health claims on the relationship between adequate 
    folate intake and risk of neural tube birth defects as required by 
    Executive Order 12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility Act. Executive 
    Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and benefits of 
    available regulatory alternatives and when regulation is necessary, to 
    select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including 
    potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects; 
    distributive impacts and equity). The Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. 
    L. 96-654) requires analyzing options for regulatory relief for small 
    businesses. FDA finds that this final rule is not a significant 
    regulatory action as defined by Executive Order 12866. In compliance 
    with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the agency certifies that the 
    final rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial number 
    of small businesses.
        On October 14, 1993, FDA published an analysis of the economic 
    impact of the proposed rule under the previous Executive Order (E.O. 
    12291). In that analysis, the agency stated that folate health claims 
    may result in increased demand for products containing folate, and that 
    an increase in consumption of products containing folate is likely to 
    result in health benefits in terms of fewer neural tube defects. The 
    agency also stated that there would be no costs associated with folate 
    health claims as use of these claims is voluntary.
        The agency concluded that it was not able to estimate the number of 
    products that will bear health claims, or the effect that folate health 
    claims will have on consumer demand for products containing folate, and 
    requested comments. As mentioned previously, the agency received nearly 
    100 comments in response to the proposed rule on health claims for 
    folate and neural tube defects. None of the comments provided 
    information that would alter the agency's economic impact conclusion.
    
    V. Collection of Information
    
        This rule contains no collection of information requirements under 
    the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et. seq.).
    
    VI. References
    
        The following information has been placed on display in the Dockets 
    Management Branch (address above) and may be seen by interested persons 
    between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m. Monday through Friday.
    
    1. Food and Nutrition Board, National Research Council, National 
    Academy of Sciences, 1980, Recommended Dietary Allowances, 9th 
    revised edition, 1980, Washington, DC, pp. 106-113.
    2. Flood, T., M. Brewster, and J. Harris, et al., ``Spina Bifida 
    Incidence at Birth--United States, 1983-1990,'' Morbidity and 
    Mortality Weekly Report, 41(27); 497-500, 1992.
    3. Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health Resources and Services 
    Administration, Public Health Service, Lin-Fu, J.S., and M.A. 
    Anthony, ``Folic Acid and Neural Tube Defects: A Fact Sheet for 
    Health Care Providers,'' May 1993.
    4. Elwood, J.M., and J.H. Elwood, ``Epidemiology of Anencephalus and 
    Spina Bifida,'' Oxford University Press, 1980.
    5. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, 
    ``Recommendations for the Use of Folic Acid to Reduce the Number of 
    Cases of Spina Bifida and Other Neural Tube Defects,'' Morbidity and 
    Mortality Weekly Report, 41/No. RR-14, pp. 1-7, September 11, 1992.
    6. Briefing Material, Folic Acid Subcommittee Meeting, April 15, 
    1993.
    7. Folic Acid Subcommittee/Food Advisory Committee Meeting, April 
    15-16, 1993, Transcript.
    8. Folic Acid Subcommittee/Food Advisory Committee, October 14-15, 
    1993, Transcript.
    9. LSRO/FASEB (1994), ``Assessment of Folate Methodology Used in the 
    Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III, 
    1988-1991),'' Bethesda, MD.
    10. Mulinare, J., J.F. Cordero, J.D. Erickson, and R.J. Berry, 
    ``Periconceptional Use of Multivitamins and the Occurrence of Neural 
    Tube Defects,'' Journal of the American Medical Association, 
    260:3141-3145, 1988.
    11. Milunsky, A., H. Jick, S.S. Jick, et al., ``Multivitamin/Folic 
    Acid Supplementation in Early Pregnancy Reduces the Prevalence of 
    Neural Tube Defects,'' Journal of the American Medical Association, 
    262:2847-2852, 1989.
    12. Mills, J.L., G.G. Rhoads, J.L. Simpson, et al., ``The Absence of 
    a Relation Between the Periconceptional use of Vitamins and Neural 
    Tube Defects,'' New England Journal of Medicine, 321:430-435, 1989.
    13. Werler, M.M., S. Shapiro, and A.A. Mitchell, ``Periconceptional 
    Folic Acid Exposure and Risk of Occurrent Neural Tube Defects,'' 
    Journal of the American Medical Association, 269:1257-1261, 1993.
    14. Wald, N., ``Prevention of Neural Tube Defects: Results of the 
    Medical Research Council Vitamin Study,'' Lancet, 338:131-137, 1991; 
    and Editorial, ``Folic Acid and Neural Tube Defects,'' Lancet, 
    338:153-154, 1991.
    15. Czeizel, A. E., and I. Dudas, ``Prevention of the First 
    Occurrence of Neural-tube Defects by Periconceptional Vitamin 
    Supplementation,'' New England Journal of Medicine, 327, 1832-1835, 
    1992.
    16. Bower, C., and F. J. Stanley, ``Dietary Folate as a Risk Factor 
    for Neural Tube Defects: Evidence from a Case-control Study in 
    Western Australia,'' Medical Journal of Australia, 150:1257-1261, 
    1989.
    17. Laurence, K. M., ``Dietary Approaches to the Prevention of 
    Neural Tube Defects,'' Nutrition and Health, 2:181-189, 1983.
    18. Shils, M. E., J. A. Olson, and M. Shike, In: Modern Nutrition in 
    Health and Disease, pp. 412-413, Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, 
    1994.
    19. Combs, G. F., In: The Vitamins: Fundamental Aspects in Nutrition 
    and Health, pp. 359-360, Academic Press, New York, 1992.
    20. Transcript of Meeting, July 27, 1992, CDC, Atlanta, GA, comment 
    no. supp.1. to docket 91N-0100, August 8, 1992.
    21. Seller, M. J., and N. C. Nevin, ``Vitamins and Neural Tube 
    Defects, Letter to the Editor,'' Journal of the American Medical 
    Association, 263:2749, 1990.
    22. Memo to File from Nancy Crane ``Food Sources of Folate,'' August 
    31, 1993.
    23. Centers for Disease Control, ``Use of Folic Acid for Prevention 
    of Spina Bifida and Other Neural Tube Defects,'' 1983-1991, 
    Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 40(30): 513-516, August 2, 
    1991.
    24. Health Protection Branch, Health and Welfare Canada, Ottawa, 
    Ontario, Canada, ``Issues: Folic Acid, The Vitamin That Helps 
    Protect Against Neural Tube (Birth) Defects,'' April 2, 1993.
    25. March of Dimes, 1994.
    26. Centers for Disease Control, Transcript of Meeting, Atlanta, GA, 
    August 12, 1993; ``Surveillance for Possible Adverse Effects of 
    Folic Acid Consumption.''
    27. Sanders, T. A. B., and S. Reddy, ``Vegetarian Diets and 
    Children,'' American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 59:5(S):1176S-
    1181S, 1994.
    28. Herbert, V., ``Staging Vitamin B12 (Cobalamin) Status in 
    Vegetarians,'' American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 
    59:5(S):1213S-1221S, 1994.
    29. Ross, F. J., H. Belding, and B. L. Paegel, ``The Development and 
    Progression of Subacute Combined Degeneration of the Spinal Cord in 
    Patients with Pernicious Anemia Treated with Synthetic 
    Pteroylglutamic (Folic) Acid,'' Blood, 3:68-90, 1948.
    30. Davidson, L. S. P., and R. H. Girdwood, ``Folic Acid as 
    Therapeutic Agent,'' British Medical Journal, 1:587-591, 1947.
    31. Hansen, H. A., and A. Weinfeld, ``Metabolic Effects and 
    Diagnostic Value of Small Doses of Folic Acid and B12 in 
    Megaloblastic Anemias,'' Acta Medica Scandinavica, 172:427-443, 
    1962. 
    
    [[Page 8779]]
    
    32. Allen, R. H., S. P. Stabler, D. G. Savage, and J. Lindenbaum, 
    ``Diagnosis of Cobalamin Deficiency.I. Usefulness of Serum 
    Methylmalonic Acid and Total Homocysteine Concentrations,'' American 
    Journal of Hematology, 34:90-98, 1990.
    33. Stambolian, D., and M. Behrens, ``Optic Neuropathy Associated 
    with Vitamin B12 Deficiency,'' American Journal of 
    Ophthalmology, 83:465-468, 1977.
    34. Cooper B. A., and T. Abe, ``Variable Response of Bone Marrow to 
    Feeding DL-5- formyltetrahydrofolate in Pernicious Anemia,'' British 
    Journal of Haematology, 32:387-394, 1976.
    35. Ellison, A. B. Curry, ``Pernicious Anemia Masked by 
    Multivitamins Containing Folic Acid,'' Journal of the American 
    Medical Association, 173:240-243, 1960.
    36. Challenger, W. A., and D. R. Korst, ``Pitfalls in the Diagnosis 
    and Treatment of Pernicious Anemia,'' American Journal of the 
    Medical Sciences, 134:226-231, 1960.
    37. Victor, M., and A. A. Lear, ``Subacute Combined Degeneration of 
    the Spinal Cord,'' American Journal of Medicine, 20:896- 911, 1956.
    38. Baldwin, J. N., and D. J. Dalessio, ``Folic Acid Therapy and 
    Spinal-cord Degeneration in Pernicious Anemia,'' New England Journal 
    of Medicine, 264:1339-1342, 1961.
    39. Vilter, R. W., J. J. Will, T. Wright, and D. Rullman, 
    ``Interrelationships of Vitamin B12, Folic Acid, and Ascorbic 
    Acid in the Megaloblastic Anemias,'' American Journal of Clinical 
    Nutrition, 12:130-144, 1963.
    40. Marshall, R. A., and J. H. Jandl, ``Responses to `Physiologic' 
    Doses of Folic Acid in the Megaloblastic Anemias,'' Archives of 
    Internal Medicine, 105:352-360, 1960.
    41. Chosy, J. J., D. V. Clatanoff, and R. F. Schilling, ``Responses 
    to Small Doses of Folic Acid in Pernicious Anemia,'' American 
    Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 10:349-350, 1962.
    42. Hansen, H. A., and A. Weinfeld, ``Metabolic Effects and Diagno 
    Stic Value of Small Doses of Folic Acid and B12 in 
    Megaloblastic Anemias,'' Acta Medica Scandinavica, 172:427-443, 
    1962.
    43. Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences, ``Nutrition 
    During Pregnancy,'' National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1990.
    44. Lindenbaum, J., I. H. Rosenberg, Peter W. F. Wilson, S. P. 
    Stabler, and R. H. Allen, ``Prevalence of Cobalamin Deficiency in 
    the Framingham Elderly Population,'' American Journal of Clinical 
    Nutrition, 60:2-11, 1994.
    45. Hathcock, J., and G. Troendle, ``Oral Cobalamin for Treatment of 
    Pernicious Anemia,'' Journal of the American Medical Association, 
    265:96-97, 1991.
    46. Mooij, P. N. M., R. P. M. Steegers- Theunissen, C. M. G. Thomas, 
    W. H. Doesburg, and T. K. A. B. Eskes, ``Periconceptional Vitamin 
    Profiles Are Not Suitable for Identifying Women at Risk for Neural 
    Tube Defects,'' Journal of Nutrition, 123:197-203, 1993.
    47. Mills, J. L., J. M. McPartlin, P. N. Kirke, Y. J. Lee, M. R. 
    Conley, D. G. Weir, and J. M. Scott, ``Impaired Homocysteine 
    Metabolism in Pregnancies Complicated by Neural Tube Defects,'' 
    Lancet, 345:149-151, 1995.
    48. Chambers, J. B., Norman W. Klein, P. G. Nosel, L. H. Khairallah, 
    and James S. Romanow, ``Methionine Overcomes Neural Tube Defects in 
    Rat Embryos Cultured on Sera from Laminin-immunized Monkeys,'' 
    Journal of Nutrition, 125:1587-1599, 1995.
    49. Shaw, G. M., N. G. Jensvold, C. R. Wasserman, and E. J. Lammer, 
    ``Epidemiologic Characteristics of Phenotypically Distinct Neural 
    Tube Defects Among 0.7 million California Births, 1983-1987,'' 
    Teratology, 49:143-149, 1994.
    50. Shaw, G. M., D. S. Schaffer, E. M. Velie, K. Morland, and J. A. 
    Harris, ``Periconceptional Vitamin Use, Dietary Folate, and the 
    Occurrence of Neural Tube Defects,'' Epidemiology, 6:219-226, 1995.
    51. Kirke, P. N., A. M. Molloy, L. E. Daly, H. Burke, D. G. Weir, 
    and J. M. Scott ``Maternal Plasma Folate and Vitamin B12 Are 
    Independent Risk Factors for Neural Tube Defects,'' Quarterly 
    Journal of Medicine, 86:703-708, 1993.
    52. Centers for Disease Control, ``Use of Folic Acid for Prevention 
    of Spina Bifida and Other Neural Tube Defects; 1983-1991,'' 
    Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 40(30):513-516, August 2, 
    1991.
    53. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, 
    ``Knowledge and Use of Folic Acid by Women of Childbearing Age--
    United States, 1995,'' Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 44/No. 
    R38, pp. 716-718, September 29, 1995.
    54. Levy, A., ``Report on Health Claims Focus Groups,'' June 15, 
    1995.
    
    List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 101
    
        Food labeling, Nutrition, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
    
        Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under 
    the authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR 
    part 101 is amended as follows:
    
    PART 101--FOOD LABELING
    
        1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 101 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: Secs. 4, 5, 6 of the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act 
    (15 U.S.C. 1453, 1454, 1455); secs. 201, 301, 402, 403, 409, 701 of 
    the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 342, 
    343, 348, 371).
    
        2. Section 101.9 Nutrition labeling of food is amended in paragraph 
    (c)(8)(v) by revising the entry for folate to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 101.9  Nutrition labeling of food.
    
    * * * * *
        (c) * * *
        (8) * * *
        (v) * * *
        Folate--either Folic acid or Folacin may be used.
    * * * * *
    
    
    Sec. 101.36  [Amended]
    
        3. Section 101.36 Nutrition labeling of dietary supplements of 
    vitamins and minerals is amended in paragraph (b)(3)(v) by removing the 
    words ``folate (folacin),'' and by adding in their place the words 
    ``folate--either folic acid or folacin may be used.''
        4. Section 101.79 is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 101.79  Health claims: Folate and neural tube defects.
    
        (a) Relationship between folate and neural tube defects--(1) 
    Definition. Neural tube defects are serious birth defects of the brain 
    or spinal cord that can result in infant mortality or serious 
    disability. The birth defects anencephaly and spina bifida are the most 
    common forms of neural tube defects and account for about 90 percent of 
    these defects. These defects result from failure of closure of the 
    covering of the brain or spinal cord during early embryonic 
    development. Because the neural tube forms and closes during early 
    pregnancy, the defect may occur before a woman realizes that she is 
    pregnant.
        (2) Relationship. The available data show that diets adequate in 
    folate may reduce the risk of neural tube defects. The strongest 
    evidence for this relationship comes from an intervention study by the 
    Medical Research Council of the United Kingdom that showed that women 
    at risk of recurrence of a neural tube defect pregnancy who consumed a 
    supplement containing 4 milligrams (mg)(4,000 micrograms (mcg)) folic 
    acid daily before conception and continuing into early pregnancy had a 
    reduced risk of having a child with a neural tube defect. (Products 
    containing this level of folic acid are drugs). In addition, based on 
    its review of a Hungarian intervention trial that reported 
    periconceptional use of a multivitamin and multimineral preparation 
    containing 800 mcg (0.8 mg) of folic acid, and its review of the 
    observational studies that reported periconceptional use of 
    multivitamins containing 0 to 1,000 mcg of folic acid, the Food and 
    Drug Administration concluded that most of these studies had results 
    consistent with the conclusion that folate, at levels attainable in 
    usual diets, may reduce the risk of neural tube defects.
        (b) Significance of folate--(1) Public health concern. Neural tube 
    defects 
    
    [[Page 8780]]
    occur in approximately 0.6 of 1,000 live births in the United States 
    (i.e., approximately 6 of 10,000 live births; about 2,500 cases among 4 
    million live births annually). Neural tube defects are believed to be 
    caused by many factors. The single greatest risk factor for a neural 
    tube defect-affected pregnancy is a personal or family history of a 
    pregnancy affected with a such a defect. However, about 90 percent of 
    infants with a neural tube defect are born to women who do not have a 
    family history of these defects. The available evidence shows that 
    diets adequate in folate may reduce the risk of neural tube defects but 
    not of other birth defects.
        (2) Populations at risk. Prevalence rates for neural tube defects 
    have been reported to vary with a wide range of factors including 
    genetics, geography, socioeconomic status, maternal birth cohort, month 
    of conception, race, nutrition, and maternal health, including maternal 
    age and reproductive history. Women with a close relative (i.e., 
    sibling, niece, nephew) with a neural tube defect, those with insulin-
    dependent diabetes mellitus, and women with seizure disorders who are 
    being treated with valproic acid or carbamazepine are at significantly 
    increased risk compared with women without these characteristics. Rates 
    for neural tube defects vary within the United States, with lower rates 
    observed on the west coast than on the east coast.
        (3) Those who may benefit. Based on a synthesis of information from 
    several studies, including those which used multivitamins containing 
    folic acid at a daily dose level of 400 mcg (0.4 
    mg), the Public Health Service has inferred that folate alone at levels 
    of 400 mcg (0.4 mg) per day may reduce the risk of neural tube defects. 
    The protective effect found in studies of lower dose folate measured by 
    the reduction in neural tube defect incidence, ranges from none to 
    substantial; a reasonable estimate of the expected reduction in the 
    United States is 50 percent. It is expected that consumption of 
    adequate folate will avert some, but not all, neural tube defects. The 
    underlying causes of neural tube defects are not known. Thus, it is not 
    known what proportion of neural tube defects will be averted by 
    adequate folate consumption. From the available evidence, the Public 
    Health Service estimates that there is the potential for averting 50 
    percent of cases that now occur (i.e., about 1,250 cases annually). 
    However, until further research is done, no firm estimate of this 
    proportion will be available.
        (c) Requirements. The label or labeling of food may contain a 
    folate/neural tube defect health claim provided that:
        (1) General requirements. The health claim for a food meets all of 
    the general requirements of Sec. 101.14 for health claims, except that 
    a food may qualify to bear the health claim if it meets the definition 
    of the term ``good source.''
        (2) Specific requirements--(i) Nature of the claim--(A) 
    Relationship. A health claim that women who are capable of becoming 
    pregnant and who consume adequate amounts of folate daily during their 
    childbearing years may reduce their risk of having a pregnancy affected 
    by spina bifida or other neural tube defects may be made on the label 
    or labeling of food provided that:
        (B) Specifying the nutrient. In specifying the nutrient, the claim 
    shall use the terms ``folate,'' ``folic acid,'' ``folacin,'' ``folate, 
    a B vitamin,'' ``folic acid, a B vitamin,'' or ``folacin, a B 
    vitamin.''
        (C) Specifying the condition. In specifying the health- related 
    condition, the claim shall identify the birth defects as ``neural tube 
    defects,'' ``birth defects spina bifida or anencephaly,'' ``birth 
    defects of the brain or spinal cord anencephaly or spina bifida,'' 
    ``spina bifida and anencephaly, birth defects of the brain or spinal 
    cord,'' ``birth defects of the brain or spinal cord;'' or ``brain or 
    spinal cord birth defects.''
        (D) Multifactorial nature. The claim shall not imply that folate 
    intake is the only recognized risk factor for neural tube defects.
        (E) Reduction in risk. The claim shall not attribute any specific 
    degree of reduction in risk of neural tube defects from maintaining an 
    adequate folate intake throughout the childbearing years. The claim 
    shall state that some women may reduce their risk of a neural tube 
    defect pregnancy by maintaining adequate intakes of folate during their 
    childbearing years. Optional statements about population-based 
    estimates of risk reduction may be made in accordance with paragraph 
    (c)(3)(vi) of this section.
        (F) Safe upper limit of daily intake. Claims on foods that contain 
    more than 100 percent of the Daily Value (DV) (400 mcg) when labeled 
    for use by adults and children 4 or more years of age, or 800 mcg when 
    labeled for use by pregnant or lactating women) shall identify the safe 
    upper limit of daily intake with respect to the DV. The safe upper 
    limit of daily intake value of 1,000 mcg (1 mg) may be included in 
    parentheses.
        (G) The claim. The claim shall not state that a specified amount of 
    folate per serving from one source is more effective in reducing the 
    risk of neural tube defects than a lower amount per serving from 
    another source.
        (H) The claim shall state that folate needs to be consumed as part 
    of a healthful diet.
        (ii) Nature of the food--(A) Requirements. The food shall meet or 
    exceed the requirements for a ``good source'' of folate as defined in 
    Sec. 101.54;
        (B) Dietary supplements. Dietary supplements shall meet the United 
    States Pharmacopeia (USP) standards for disintegration and dissolution, 
    except that if there are no applicable USP standards, the folate in the 
    dietary supplement shall be shown to be bioavailable under the 
    conditions of use stated on the product label.
        (iii) Limitation. The claim shall not be made on foods that contain 
    more than 100 percent of the RDI for vitamin A as retinol or preformed 
    vitamin A or vitamin D per serving or per unit.
        (iv) Nutrition labeling. The nutrition label shall include 
    information about the amount of folate in the food. This information 
    shall be declared after the declaration for iron if only the levels of 
    vitamin A, vitamin C, calcium, and iron are provided, or in accordance 
    with Sec. 101.9 (c)(8) and (c)(9) if other optional vitamins or 
    minerals are declared.
        (3) Optional information--(i) Risk factors. The claim may 
    specifically identify risk factors for neural tube defects. Where such 
    information is provided, it may consist of statements from 
    Sec. 101.79(b)(1) or (b)(2) (e.g., Women at increased risk include 
    those with a personal history of a neural tube defect-affected 
    pregnancy, those with a close relative (i.e., sibling, niece, nephew) 
    with a neural tube defect; those with insulin-dependent diabetes 
    mellitus; those with seizure disorders who are being treated with 
    valproic acid or carbamazepine) or from other parts of this paragraph 
    (c)(3)(i).
        (ii) Relationship between folate and neural tube defects. The claim 
    may include statements from paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section that 
    summarize the relationship between folate and neural tube defects and 
    the significance of the relationship except for information 
    specifically prohibited from the claim.
        (iii) Personal history of a neural tube defect-affected pregnancy. 
    The claim may state that women with a history of a neural tube defect 
    pregnancy should consult their physicians or health care providers 
    before becoming pregnant. If such a statement is provided, the claim 
    shall also state that all women should consult a health care provider 
    when planning a pregnancy.
        (iv) Daily value. The claim may identify 100 percent of the DV 
    (100% DV; 400 mcg) for folate as the target intake goal. 
    
    [[Page 8781]]
    
        (v) Prevalence. The claim may provide estimates, expressed on an 
    annual basis, of the number of neural tube defect-affected births among 
    live births in the United States. Current estimates are provided in 
    Sec. 101.79(b)(1), and are approximately 6 of 10,000 live births 
    annually (i.e., about 2,500 cases among 4 million live births 
    annually). Data provided in Sec. 101.79(b)(1) shall be used, unless 
    more current estimates from the U.S. Public Health Service are 
    available, in which case the latter may be cited.
        (vi) Reduction in risk. An estimate of the reduction in the number 
    of neural tube defect-affected births that might occur in the United 
    States if all women consumed adequate folate throughout their 
    childbearing years may be included in the claim. Information contained 
    in paragraph (b)(3) of this section may be used. If such an estimate 
    (i.e., 50 percent) is provided, the estimate shall be accompanied by 
    additional information that states that the estimate is population-
    based and that it does not reflect risk reduction that may be 
    experienced by individual women.
        (vii) Diets adequate in folate. The claim may identify diets 
    adequate in folate by using phrases such as ``Sources of folate include 
    fruits, vegetables, whole grain products, fortified cereals, and 
    dietary supplements.'' or ``Adequate amounts of folate can be obtained 
    from diets rich in fruits, dark green leafy vegetables, legumes, whole 
    grain products, fortified cereals, or dietary supplements.'' or 
    ``Adequate amounts of folate can be obtained from diets rich in fruits, 
    including citrus fruits and juices, vegetables, including dark green 
    leafy vegetables, legumes, whole grain products, including breads, 
    rice, and pasta, fortified cereals, or a dietary supplement.''
        (d) Model health claims. The following are examples of model health 
    claims that may be used in food labeling to describe the relationship 
    between folate and neural tube defects:
        (1) Examples 1 and 2. Model health claims appropriate for foods 
    containing 100 percent or less of the DV for folate per serving or per 
    unit (general population). The examples contain only the required 
    elements:
        (i) Healthful diets with adequate folate may reduce a woman's risk 
    of having a child with a brain or spinal cord birth defect.
        (ii) Adequate folate in healthful diets may reduce a woman's risk 
    of having a child with a brain or spinal cord birth defect.
        (2) Example 3. Model health claim appropriate for foods containing 
    100 percent or less of the DV for folate per serving or per unit. The 
    example contains all required elements plus optional information: Women 
    who consume healthful diets with adequate folate throughout their 
    childbearing years may reduce their risk of having a child with a birth 
    defect of the brain or spinal cord. Sources of folate include fruits, 
    vegetables, whole grain products, fortified cereals, and dietary 
    supplements.
        (3) Example 4. Model health claim appropriate for foods intended 
    for use by the general population and containing more than 100 percent 
    of the DV of folate per serving or per unit: Women who consume 
    healthful diets with adequate folate may reduce their risk of having a 
    child with birth defects of the brain or spinal cord. Folate intake 
    should not exceed 250% of the DV (1,000 mcg).
    
        Dated: February 26, 1996.
    David A. Kessler,
    Commissioner of Food and Drugs.
    
    Donna E. Shalala,
    Secretary of Health and Human Services.
    [FR Doc. 96-5013 Filed 2-29-96; 1:12 pm]
    BILLING CODE 4160-01-P
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
4/19/1996
Published:
03/05/1996
Department:
Food and Drug Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
96-5013
Dates:
April 19, 1996.
Pages:
8752-8781 (30 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 91N-100H
RINs:
0910-AA19: Food Labeling Review
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/0910-AA19/food-labeling-review
PDF File:
96-5013.pdf
CFR: (17)
21 CFR 101.79(a)(2)
21 CFR 101.79(b)(3)
21 CFR 101.79(b)(1)
21 CFR 101.14(d)(2)(vii))
21 CFR 101.79(c)(2)(i)(A)
More ...