98-5711. In the Matter of Julian H. McGriff; Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-Licensed Activities; Effective Immediately  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 43 (Thursday, March 5, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 10955-10957]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-5711]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [IA 97-067]
    
    
    In the Matter of Julian H. McGriff; Order Prohibiting Involvement 
    in NRC-Licensed Activities; Effective Immediately
    
    I
    
        During the period of April 1996 through March 5, 1997, Julian H. 
    McGriff was employed by Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. (SNC 
    or licensee) at its Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant as an Emergency 
    Preparedness Technician. SNC holds License Nos. NPF-2 and NPF-8 for 
    Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 issued by the Nuclear 
    Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) pursuant to 10 CFR Part 50 on 
    June 25, 1977, and March 31, 1981, respectively. The licenses authorize 
    SNC to operate the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant (FNP or licensee) 
    Units 1 and 2 in accordance with the conditions specified therein.
    
    II
    
        During an audit conducted by the licensee for the period November 
    25, 1996, through February 19, 1997, an inconsistency was identified 
    relating to the documentation associated with the monthly check of a 
    self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) on the 83 foot elevation of 
    the FNP Unit 2 Auxiliary Building. The monthly check was required by 
    Procedure FNP-0-EIP 16, Emergency Equipment and Supplies, Revision 31. 
    Subsequently, the licensee performed a more in-depth investigation and 
    determined that a December 17, 1996 inspection, documented by Mr. 
    Julian H. McGriff, had not been conducted. The licensee identified 
    approximately 36 additional discrepancies in the documentation 
    associated with Mr. McGriff's inspections of emergency equipment. 
    Specifically, the licensee identified instances where inventory 
    checklists were completed on dates different from the date the 
    inspections were actually conducted, the deliberate misdating of 
    checklists, and the completion of checklists for inspections never 
    conducted. Mr. McGriff was terminated from employment with SNC on March 
    5, 1997.
        On June 30, 1997, the NRC Office of Investigations (OI) completed 
    an investigation of the alleged falsification of emergency preparedness 
    checklists by Mr. McGriff. OI, in Report No. 2-97-005, concluded that 
    during the period April 1996 through January 1997, Mr. McGriff failed 
    to conduct at least three required inspections and deliberately 
    falsified at least four checklists. The finding was based on the fact 
    that inventory checklist documentation did not coincide with plant 
    access records for Mr. McGriff, which indicated that entries were not 
    made into the documented areas on the dates indicated on the 
    checklists. Specifically, based on plant access data, the following 
    checklist entries were falsified: (1) a December 17, 1996, entry for an 
    inspection of the SCBA on the 83 foot elevation of the FNP Unit 2 
    Auxiliary Building that was documented but not performed; (2) a July 
    12, 1996, entry for an inspection of the SCBA in the Diesel Generator 
    Building that was not performed; (3) an entry for an inspection of 
    emergency supplies located in the Auxiliary Building that was 
    intentionally documented as being performed on September 4, 1996, due 
    to admonitions from Mr. McGriff's supervisor regarding the timeliness 
    of inventory checks, when it was actually performed on September 30, 
    1996; and (4) a September 30, 1996, entry for an inspection of SCBAs in 
    the Diesel Generator Building that was never performed. Numerous other 
    instances where documentation did not coincide with plant access 
    records for Mr. McGriff were also identified.
        FNP Technical Specification (TS) 6.8.1.e requires that written 
    procedures be established and implemented for Emergency Plan 
    implementation. Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure FNP-0-EIP-16.0, 
    Emergency Equipment and Supplies, Revision 31 requires periodic 
    inventory verification of emergency equipment and supplies. Records 
    associated with FNP-0-EIP-016, a safety related procedure at Farley, 
    are required to be maintained in accordance with Section 17.2 of the 
    licensee's 10 CFR Appendix B required Quality Assurance Operations 
    Manual, Revision 32. The checklists, that are to be completed pursuant 
    to FNP-0-EIP-016, are required to be maintained for the lifetime of the 
    plant in accordance with Section 8.7 of licensee procedure FNP-0-AP-4, 
    Control of Plant Records, Revision 18. FNP-0-AP-4 implements item 1.h 
    of Appendix A to Regulatory Guide 1.33, dated 1978, and is required to 
    be established, implemented and maintained in accordance with TS 
    6.8.1.a. The failure to perform the emergency equipment inventories as 
    prescribed by FNP procedures is a violation of TS 6.8.1.e. In addition, 
    10 CFR 50.9(a) states, in part, that information required by the 
    Commission's regulations to be maintained by the licensee shall be 
    complete and accurate in all material respects. The failure of SNC to 
    maintain complete and accurate records of emergency equipment 
    inspections due to Mr. McGriff's falsification of inventory checklists 
    is a violation of 10 CFR 50.9(a). The inaccuracy of these records is 
    material because the licensee and the NRC relied upon them to determine 
    the availability and status of emergency equipment.
        On August 22, 1997, the NRC sent a letter to Mr. McGriff advising 
    him that his actions appeared to be in violation of 10 CFR 50.5, 
    ``Deliberate Misconduct.'' 10 CFR 50.5, in part, prohibits an employee 
    of a licensee from (1) engaging in deliberate misconduct that causes a 
    licensee to be in violation of any rule or regulation or license
    
    [[Page 10956]]
    
    condition or limitation of any license issued by the Commission; or (2) 
    deliberately submitting to a licensee information that the person 
    submitting the information knows to be incomplete or inaccurate in some 
    respect material to the NRC.
        Mr. McGriff was offered the opportunity to either attend a 
    predecisional enforcement conference or respond to the apparent 
    violation in writing. After being granted an extension, Mr. D. Lewis 
    Terry, Esquire, on behalf of Mr. McGriff, responded by letter dated 
    October 28, 1997, to the apparent violation admitting that several of 
    the inspections for which Mr. McGriff was responsible were not 
    conducted and explaining the various discrepancies in Mr. McGriff's 
    documentation of the inventories. The explanation of the discrepancies 
    did not refute the violations, but merely provided Mr. McGriff's 
    rationale for why he chose not to perform the required emergency 
    equipment inventories and why documentation of inventories did not 
    match his plant access records. Notwithstanding this explanation, the 
    result was that records indicated completed inventories which were not 
    performed on the dates specified. Mr. McGriff made no attempt to 
    indicate to either his supervisor or document that he was not 
    completing the records at the time of the inspections. In addition, he 
    failed to annotate records to explain his assumptions and expectations 
    rather than perform certain required emergency equipment inventories 
    based on visual observation.
    
    III
    
        Based on the above, it appears that Mr. McGriff engaged in 
    deliberate misconduct when he failed to perform certain required 
    inspections of emergency equipment and deliberately falsified inventory 
    checklists that SNC and the NRC relied upon to determine the 
    availability and status of emergency equipment. Mr. McGriff's 
    deliberate misconduct caused the licensee to be in violation of FNP TS 
    6.8.1.e and 10 CFR 50.9(a) and is, therefore, a violation of 10 CFR 
    50.5(a)(1) and (2). The NRC must be able to rely on licensees and their 
    employees to fully comply with NRC requirements, including plant 
    procedural requirements which ensure the availability and operability 
    of equipment used in emergency situations and requirements to maintain 
    records that are complete and accurate in all material respects. Mr. 
    McGriff's deliberate misconduct, that caused the licensee to violate TS 
    6.8.1.e and 10 CFR 50.9(a), raises serious doubt as to whether he can 
    be relied upon to comply with NRC requirements and to provide complete 
    and accurate information to the NRC.
        Consequently, I lack the requisite reasonable assurance that 
    licensed activities can be conducted in compliance with Commission 
    requirements and that public health and safety will be protected if Mr. 
    McGriff were permitted to be involved in NRC-licensed activities at 
    this time. Therefore, public health, safety and interest require that 
    Mr. McGriff be prohibited from any involvement in NRC-licensed 
    activities for a period of three years from the date of his dismissal 
    from SNC, March 5, 1997, and, if he is currently involved with another 
    licensee in performing NRC-licensed activities, he must immediately 
    cease such activities and inform the NRC of the name, address and 
    telephone number of the employer, and provide a copy of this Order to 
    the employer. Additionally, Mr. McGriff is required to notify the NRC 
    of his first employment in NRC-licensed activities for one year 
    following the prohibition period. Furthermore, pursuant to 10 CFR 
    2.202, I find that the significance of Mr. McGriff's conduct described 
    above is such that the public health, safety and interest require that 
    this Order be immediately effective.
    
    IV
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 103, 161b, 161i, 161o, 182 and 
    186 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission's 
    regulations in 10 CFR 2.202, 10 CFR 50.5 and 10 CFR 150.20, It is 
    hereby ordered effective immediately, that:
        A. Mr. Julian H. McGriff is prohibited until March 5, 2000, from 
    engaging in or exercising control over individuals engaged in NRC-
    licensed activities. If Mr. McGriff is currently involved in NRC-
    licensed activities, he must immediately cease such activities, inform 
    the NRC of the name, address and telephone number of the employer, and 
    provide a copy of this Order to the employer. NRC-licensed activities 
    are those activities that are conducted pursuant to a specific or 
    general license issued by the NRC, including, but not limited to, those 
    activities of Agreement State licensees conducted pursuant to the 
    authority granted by 10 CFR 150.20.
        B. For a period of one year following the period of prohibition set 
    forth in Paragraph IV.A above, Mr. Julian H. McGriff shall, within 20 
    days of his acceptance of his first employment offer involving NRC-
    licensed activities as defined in Paragraph IV.A above, provide notice 
    to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
    Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555, of the name, address, and telephone 
    number of the employer or the entity where he is, or will be, involved 
    in NRC-licensed activities. The notice shall include a statement of his 
    commitment to compliance with regulatory requirements and the basis for 
    why the Commission should have confidence that he will now comply with 
    applicable NRC requirements.
        The Director, Office of Enforcement, may relax or rescind, in 
    writing, any of the above conditions upon demonstration by Mr. McGriff 
    of good cause.
    
    V
    
        In accordance with 10 CFR 2.202, Mr. McGriff must submit an answer 
    to this Order, and may request a hearing on this Order, within 20 days 
    of the date of this Order. Where good cause is shown, consideration 
    will be given to extending the time to request a hearing. A request for 
    extension of time must be made in writing to the Director, Office of 
    Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555, 
    and include a statement of good cause for the extension. The answer may 
    consent to this Order. Unless the answer consents to this Order, the 
    answer shall, in writing and under oath or affirmation, specifically 
    admit or deny each allegation or charge made in this Order and shall 
    set forth the matters of fact and law on which Mr. McGriff relies and 
    the reasons as to why the Order should not have been issued. Any answer 
    or request for a hearing shall be submitted to the Secretary, U.S. 
    Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Chief, Rulemakings Adjudications 
    Staff, Washington, D.C. 20555. Copies also shall be sent to the 
    Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 
    Washington, D.C. 20555, to the Assistant General Counsel for Hearings 
    and Enforcement at the same address, and to the Regional Administrator, 
    NRC Region II, Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Suite 
    23T85, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 and to Mr. McGriff if the answer or 
    hearing request is by a person other than Mr. McGriff. If a person 
    other than Mr. McGriff requests a hearing, that person shall set forth 
    with particularity the manner in which his interest is adversely 
    affected by this Order and shall address the criteria set forth in 10 
    CFR 2.714(d).
        If a hearing is requested by Mr. McGriff, the Commission will issue 
    an Order designating the time and place of any hearing. If a hearing is 
    held, the issue to be considered at such hearing
    
    [[Page 10957]]
    
    shall be whether this Order should be sustained.
        Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.202(c)(2)(i), Mr. McGriff may, in addition to 
    demanding a hearing, at the time the answer is filed or sooner, move 
    the presiding officer to set aside the immediate effectiveness of the 
    Order on the ground that the Order, including the need for immediate 
    effectiveness, is not based on adequate evidence but on mere suspicion, 
    unfounded allegations, or error.
        In the absence of any request for hearing, or written approval of 
    an extension of time in which to request a hearing, the provisions 
    specified in Section IV above shall be final 20 days from the date of 
    this Order without further order or proceedings. If an extension of 
    time for requesting a hearing has been approved, the provisions 
    specified in Section IV shall be final when the extension expires if a 
    hearing request has not been received. An answer or a request for 
    hearing shall not stay the immediate effectiveness of this order.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 23rd day of February 1998.
    Ashok C. Thadani,
    Acting Deputy Executive Director for Regulatory Effectiveness.
    [FR Doc. 98-5711 Filed 3-4-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7580-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/05/1998
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-5711
Pages:
10955-10957 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
IA 97-067
PDF File:
98-5711.pdf