99-5449. National Research Institutes' Field-Initiated Studies (FIS) Research Grant Program; Notice of Application Review Procedures for OERI Fiscal Year 1999 FIS Grants.  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 43 (Friday, March 5, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 10652-10653]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-5449]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
    
    Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI)
    [CFDA No: 84.305T]
    
    
    National Research Institutes' Field-Initiated Studies (FIS) 
    Research Grant Program; Notice of Application Review Procedures for 
    OERI Fiscal Year 1999 FIS Grants.
    
    SUMMARY: On December 14, 1998, the Secretary published in the Federal 
    Register (63 FR 68985) a notice inviting applications for new awards 
    for fiscal year 1999 for the FIS Research Grant Program. On January 28, 
    1999, the Secretary published in the Federal Register (64 FR 4401) a 
    notice extending
    
    [[Page 10653]]
    
    the deadline date for the receipt of applications and applications 
    availability date for this program. This notice explains the procedures 
    that will be used in reviewing applications.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Secretary advises potential applicants 
    of the following two tier review process that will be used by the FIS 
    Program for this year's competition. This two tier process modifies the 
    review procedures established in 34 CFR 700.21. The regulations in 34 
    CFR Part 700 otherwise remain in effect.
    
    Application Review Procedure
    
        Tier I. At the Tier I level, each application will be assigned to 
    at least three reviewers who are selected according to the 
    appropriateness of their expertise and experience and who specifically 
    meet the qualifications for reviewers established in the regulations at 
    34 CFR 700.11. Reviewers will evaluate the assigned applications in 
    accordance with the three equally weighted selection criteria 
    established in the application package: (1) National Significance; (2) 
    Project Design; and (3) Personnel. Reviewers will rate the assigned 
    applications as either: ``Excellent'' (outstanding, deserves highest 
    priority for support); ``Very Good'' (high quality proposal in nearly 
    all aspects; should be supported if at all possible); ``Good'' (a 
    quality proposal, worthy of support); ``Fair'' (proposal lacking in one 
    or more critical aspects-key issues need to be addressed); or ``Poor'' 
    (proposal has serious deficiencies). A conference call will be arranged 
    for each review panel to discuss their assigned proposals and their 
    rankings.
        Based on the Tier I reviews, the top 60 applications will advance 
    to the Tier II review. The top 60 will be determined by assigning a 
    score of ``2'' for every ``excellent'' rating the application receives, 
    a score of ``1'' for each ``very good'' rating the application receives 
    and a score of ``0'' for any other rating. The application will then be 
    ranked by total score. In the event of a tie at the 60th rank all such 
    tied applications will advance to the Tier II review.
        Tier II. Each application that advances to the Tier II level will 
    be read by 25 Tier II reviewers, with written reviews completed by at 
    least 3 reviewers. These reviewers will meet the qualifications for 
    reviewers established in 34 CFR 700.11. The Tier II reviewers will 
    apply the same selection criteria and the same rating system used in 
    Tier I.
        The Tier II reviewers will meet in Washington, DC. During this 
    time, each application will be discussed in turn, with the three 
    reviewers who have completed written reviews leading the discussion. 
    Following the discussion of each application, all reviewers will assign 
    a final rating to the application.
        When all the applications from Tier II have been discussed and 
    reviewers have completed their evaluations, OERI staff will rank the 
    applications to form the recommended slate to be sent forward to the 
    Assistant Secretary. The slate will be formed as follows. An 
    application will receive a score of 2 for each ``Excellent'' rating it 
    receives and a score of 1 for each ``Very Good'' rating it receives. 
    The applications will then be ranked by total score. In the event that 
    a set of applications surrounding the funding cutoff point have an 
    identical score, the Assistant Secretary will determine which 
    applications from that set contribute most to the mission of OERI.
    
    Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking
    
        In accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553), 
    it is the practice of the Secretary to offer interested parties the 
    opportunity to comment on proposed regulations. However, since this 
    notice merely establishes procedural requirements for review of 
    applications and does not create substantive policy, proposed 
    rulemaking is not required under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) (A).
        (The valid OMB control number for this collection of information is 
    1850-0601.)
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Veda Bright, Office of Educational 
    Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education, 555 New Jersey 
    Avenue, NW, Room 604, Washington, DC 20208, or by e-mail at 
    veda__bright@ed.gov or by telephone at (202) 219-1935. Individuals who 
    use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal 
    Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 
    p.m. Eastern time, Monday through Friday.
        Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an 
    alternate format (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer 
    diskette) on request to the contact person listed in the preceding 
    paragraph.
    
    Electronic Access to This Document
    
        Anyone may view this document, as well as all other Department of 
    Education documents published in the Federal Register, in text or 
    portable document format (pdf) via the Internet at either of the 
    following sites:
        http://ocfo.ed.gov/fedreg.htm
        http://www.ed.gov/news.html
        To use the pdf you must have the Adobe Acrobat Reader Program with 
    Search, which is available free at either of the previous sites. If you 
    have questions about using the pdf, call the U.S. Government Printing 
    Office at (202) 512-1530 or, toll free, at 1-888-293-6498.
        Anyone may also view these documents in text copy only on an 
    electronic bulletin board of the Department. Telephone: (202) 219-1511, 
    or toll free, 1-800-222-4922. The documents are located under Option 
    G--Files/Announcements, Bulletins and Press Releases.
    
        Note: The official version of a document is the document 
    published in the Federal Register.
    
        Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 6031(c)(2)(B).
    
        Dated: March 1, 1999.
    C. Kent McGuire,
    Assistant Secretary for Educational Research and Improvement.
    [FR Doc. 99-5449 Filed 3-4-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/05/1999
Department:
Education Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
99-5449
Pages:
10652-10653 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
CFDA No: 84.305T
PDF File:
99-5449.pdf