99-5456. Availability of an Environmental Assessment on the Proposed Issuance of an Incidental Take Permit for Boise Cascade Timber Company, Clatsop County, Oregon  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 43 (Friday, March 5, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 10717-10718]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-5456]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
    
    Fish and Wildlife Service
    
    
    Availability of an Environmental Assessment on the Proposed 
    Issuance of an Incidental Take Permit for Boise Cascade Timber Company, 
    Clatsop County, Oregon
    
    AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, DOI.
    
    ACTION: Notice of availability, Request for comments, and reopening of 
    comment period.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This notice advises the public that the Fish and Wildlife 
    Service (Service) has prepared a draft Environmental Assessment on the 
    proposed issuance of an incidental take permit to the Boise Cascade 
    Corporation (Boise Cascade) pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(B) of the 
    Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). The proposed permit 
    would authorize the incidental take, resulting from habitat 
    modification, of the northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina), 
    which is listed under the Act as a threatened species. The Service 
    announced the receipt of Boise Cascade's incidental take permit 
    application and the availability of the Boise Cascade Walker Creek Unit 
    Habitat Conservation Plan (Plan) and draft Implementation Agreement, 
    which accompany the incidental take permit application, for public 
    comment on December 23, 1998 (63 FR 71148). Because the draft 
    Environmental Assessment provides additional information on the effects 
    of the proposed permit issuance, the Service will accept additional 
    comments on the permit application, Plan, and draft Implementation 
    Agreement during the comment period for the draft Environmental 
    Assessment.
    
    DATES: Written comments on the draft Environmental Assessment, permit 
    application, Plan, and draft Implementation Agreement should be 
    received on or before April 5, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Individuals wishing copies of the draft Environmental 
    Assessment, permit application, full text of the Plan, or the draft 
    Implementation Agreement should immediately contact the office and 
    personnel listed below. These documents also will be available for 
    public inspection, by appointment, during normal business hours at the 
    address below. Comments regarding the draft Environmental Assessment, 
    permit application, draft Implementation Agreement or the Plan should 
    be addressed to State Supervisor, Fish and Wildlife Service, Oregon 
    State Office, 2600 S.E. 98th Avenue, Suite 100, Portland, Oregon 97266. 
    Please refer to permit number TE005227-0 when submitting comments.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Rich Szlemp, Fish and Wildlife 
    Service, Oregon State Office, telephone (503) 231-6179.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Boise Cascade is proposing to harvest 
    approximately 50 acres of mature and old growth forest from a 65-acre 
    parcel of land. The surrounding ownership consists of Oregon Department 
    of Forestry land and lands owned by the Agency Creek Management 
    Company. The Boise Cascade property contains two nest trees that were 
    occupied by a pair of northern spotted owls between 1990 and 1996. 
    Other listed species may also be affected by the proposed Plan. Coho 
    salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) are found in Walker Creek in the Plan 
    area. No surveys have been conducted for marbled murrelets 
    (Brachyramphus marmoratus) or bald eagles (Haliaeeus leucocephalus), 
    but the Plan area does contain potentially suitable nesting platforms 
    for marbled murrelets and contains suitable bald eagle habitat. The 
    Plan area contains some of the best northern spotted owl nesting 
    habitat in the northern portion of the Oregon Coast Range. Most of the 
    surrounding land has been logged or contains younger stands of timber 
    that do not provide as high quality of owl nesting habitat as the Plan 
    area.
    
    Alternatives Analyzed in the Draft Environmental Assessment
    
    Alternative 1. No Action
    
        Under this alternative the Service would not issue a permit or the 
    applicant would decide to not harvest the unit. For this analysis, it 
    is assumed that this alternative would maintain the existing old growth 
    forest within the unit.
    
    Alternative 2. The Incidental Take Permit Application and Plan 
    Submitted by Boise Cascade
    
        This alternative would provide for the maximum timber harvest 
    allowable under the Oregon Forest Practices Act. Boise Cascade would 
    harvest about 50 acres of a 70-acre spotted owl core area originally 
    designated by the Oregon Department of Forestry. Boise Cascade removed 
    6 acres of forest associated with the construction of a logging road in 
    1989. The remaining 14 acres of the core is on adjacent state forest 
    lands or private lands. Logging of the unit was prohibited by the State 
    of Oregon until 1997 because the unit was within the core area of an 
    active spotted owl site. Due to the lack of use of this site as an 
    activity center for spotted owls in 1997, the Oregon Department of 
    Forestry formally considered this site abandoned. However, the 50 acres 
    are all considered suitable spotted owl habitat and include two trees 
    that were known to be used by spotted owls as nest trees. A pair of 
    spotted owls were active in the vicinity of this core area between 1990 
    and 1996, and were known to have nested in 1990, 1992 and
    
    [[Page 10718]]
    
    1994. A juvenile spotted owl has been detected in various locations in 
    the general vicinity of the unit over the past year.
        Boise Cascade proposes to: conduct harvest activities outside of 
    the spotted owl nesting season (March 1-September 15); use existing 
    roads that may need to be graded or otherwise refurbished for hauling 
    use; use a tractor to remove logs in areas of flat terrain; use a 
    cable/skyline to yard trees on the majority of the area which contains 
    slopes of greater than 30 percent; and, replant harvested areas with 
    Douglas-fir, sitka spruce, western red cedar, and/or western hemlock 
    within 12 months of harvest. As required by the Oregon Forest Practices 
    Act, Boise Cascade would leave, on average per acre harvested, at 
    least:
         Two snags or two green trees at least 30 feet in height 
    and 11 inches diameter at breast height (dbh) or larger, at least 50 
    percent of which are conifers; and
         Two downed logs or downed trees, at least 50 percent of 
    which are conifers, that each comprise at least 10 cubic-feet gross 
    volume and are no less than 6 feet long. One downed conifer or suitable 
    hardwood log of at least 20 cubic feet gross volume and no less than 6 
    feet long may count as 2 logs.
        In addition, Boise Cascade has stated in its written operations 
    harvesting plan (97-11514) dated October 22, 1997, and submitted to the 
    Oregon Department of Forestry that it would log the unit in accordance 
    with the following conditions:
         No conifer would be harvested within 100 feet of Walker 
    Creek (using the high water mark as a boundary). No hardwood would be 
    harvested within 50 feet of Walker Creek. All ``in-unit'' leave trees 
    would be placed in, or adjacent to, the riparian management area. 
    Conifer leave trees would be placed further than 100-feet from Walker 
    Creek and hardwood leave trees would be placed further than 50-feet 
    from Walker Creek. The ``in-unit'' leave trees would be a minimum of 75 
    percent conifer. All other trees would be harvested;
         Any tree that cannot be felled and kept further than 50 
    feet from Walker Creek would be left standing. Any portion of a felled 
    tree inadvertently falling within 50 feet of Walker Creek would be 
    left;
         No downed wood or snags (except those required to be cut 
    for safety) would be cut within the Walker Creek riparian management 
    area. No downed wood or snags would be cut within 20 feet of a small 
    tributary that enters Walker Creek in the northeast corner of the unit; 
    and
         The unit would be cable/cat yarded. Logging skylines may 
    hang across the riparian management area. All yarding road changes 
    would be made either by clearing above the riparian management area or 
    by pulling back and restringing each road. Only safety trees would be 
    cut in this process.
        This alternative would eliminate spotted owl habitat for an unknown 
    and indefinite period of time. This alternative would likely result in 
    incidental take in the form of harm by impairing essential breeding, 
    feeding, and sheltering behaviors of spotted owls.
    
    Alternative 3. Large Tree, Snag, and Downed Wood Retention Alternative
    
        This alternative is similar to the Boise Cascade Plan, but would 
    include the following prescriptions:
         Two of the largest diameter green trees per acre harvested 
    would be retained, including the two known spotted owl nest trees. Half 
    of these trees would be a minimum of 26 inches dbh, and the remaining 
    half would be a minimum of 34 inches dbh. Snags could be substituted 
    for green trees, so long as the total number would not exceed more than 
    20 percent of the leave trees, and the snags have a trunk at least 30 
    feet tall. Trees retained within the designated 100-foot riparian 
    management area under the Oregon Forest Practices Act could not be 
    double-counted for the leave trees;
         The retained trees would be clumped and randomly 
    distributed throughout the harvested acreage, and not all clumped 
    within or immediately adjacent to the riparian management area. The 
    clumps would be positioned and composed of enough trees, including sub-
    dominant trees if necessary, to withstand windthrow in such a manner 
    that the target of 100 leave trees would be maintained outside of the 
    riparian management area;
         All existing downed logs would be retained; and
         The retained trees would not be harvested for a period of 
    80 years.
        This alternative would result in a likelihood of incidental take of 
    spotted owls associated with harm through habitat loss, but would 
    provide dispersal quality habitat in about 40 years.
    
    Alternative 4. Dispersal Habitat Alternative
    
        This alternative would allow for timber harvest in accordance with 
    the following prescriptions:
         No more than 40 percent of the standing tree basal area 
    would be removed, and trees that would be at least 11 inches dbh and 
    have an average 40 percent canopy closure immediately after harvest 
    would be retained;
         At least one of the two known spotted owl nest trees would 
    be retained;
         No downed logs would be removed; and
         Further logging on the unit would be deferred for 40 
    years.
        This alternative would result in a likelihood of incidental take of 
    spotted owls by harm through habitat loss within the area harvested, 
    but would maintain dispersal quality habitat and provide spotted owl 
    foraging opportunities.
    
    Alternative 5. Dispersal and Remnant Nesting Habitat Alternative
    
        In addition to the prescriptions identified in alternative 4, this 
    alternative would add a 500-foot, no-cut protection zone, within the 
    bounds of the property, centered around one of the two known owl nest 
    trees.
        This alternative would result in a likelihood of incidental take of 
    spotted owls by harm through habitat loss within the area harvested, 
    but would maintain dispersal and foraging quality habitat, and provide 
    a remnant piece of nesting quality habitat.
        All interested agencies, organizations, and individuals are urged 
    to provide comments on the draft Environmental Assessment, permit 
    application, Plan, and draft Implementation Agreement. All comments 
    received by the closing date will be considered by the Service as it 
    completes its National Environmental Policy Act compliance and makes 
    its decision regarding permit issuance or denial.
    
        Dated: February 26, 1999.
    Cynthia U. Barry,
    Acting Regional Director, Region 1, Portland, Oregon.
    [FR Doc. 99-5456 Filed 3-4-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/05/1999
Department:
Fish and Wildlife Service
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of availability, Request for comments, and reopening of comment period.
Document Number:
99-5456
Dates:
Written comments on the draft Environmental Assessment, permit application, Plan, and draft Implementation Agreement should be received on or before April 5, 1999.
Pages:
10717-10718 (2 pages)
PDF File:
99-5456.pdf