95-5502. Requirements for the Special Packaging of Household Substances; Opportunity for Oral Comment  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 43 (Monday, March 6, 1995)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 12165-12166]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-5502]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
    
    16 CFR Part 1700
    
    
    Requirements for the Special Packaging of Household Substances; 
    Opportunity for Oral Comment
    
    AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.
    
    ACTION: Opportunity for presentation of oral public comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Commission announces an opportunity for the presentation 
    of oral comments on two issues that were recently raised concerning 
    amendments the Commission is considering to its regulations under the 
    Poison Prevention Packaging Act of 1970 (PPPA) for child-resistant 
    packaging to change the child and adult tests under which child-
    resistant packaging is evaluated.
        Immediately after issuing a rule amending the PPPA test protocol, 
    the Commission was provided with comments on the final rule that had 
    not previously been submitted to the agency during the course of the 
    rulemaking. As a result, the Commission, on February 9, 1995, voted to 
    withhold publication of the final rule in order to consider these new 
    arguments.
        The new arguments can be summarized as follows. First, in 
    establishing an adult test panel consisting of adults aged 60-75, the 
    Commission allegedly exceeded its statutory authority to require that 
    child-resistant packaging not be difficult for ``normal adults'' to use 
    properly. Second, the rule allegedly addresses consumer convenience, 
    rather than safety, which the comment claims is not properly the 
    subject of a Commission regulation.
        The Commission has provided that written comments, limited to these 
    two issues, may be submitted until March 7, 1995. In addition, the 
    Commission is providing the opportunity for interested parties to 
    present oral comments, on these two issues alone, limited to a maximum 
    of 10 minutes per commenter.
    
    DATES: Oral comments limited to the new issues described below may be 
    presented to the Commission at a Commission hearing beginning at 10:00 
    a.m., March 16, 1995. A request to present oral comments and an outline 
    or text of the comments must be received by the Commission on or before 
    March 10, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: The hearing will be held in the Commission's Hearing Room, 
    4330 East-West Highway, 4th Floor, Bethesda, MD 20814. Requests to 
    present comments and outlines or text of the comments should be mailed 
    to the Office of the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 
    Washington, DC 20207, or delivered to the Office of the Secretary, 
    Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 501, 4340 East-West Highway, 
    Bethesda, MD 20814.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suzanne Barone, Ph.D., Project 
    Manager, Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, DC 20207; 
    telephone (301) 504-0477, ext. 1196.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Poison Prevention Packaging Act of 1970 
    (``PPPA''), 15 U.S.C. 1471-1476, authorizes the Consumer Product Safety 
    Commission to issue requirements that certain household substances be 
    sold in child-resistant (``CR'') packaging. Under the PPPA, the 
    Commission has defined and established standards for such ``special'' 
    packaging. 16 CFR 1700.1(b)(4), 1700.3, 1700.15, and 1700.20. The 
    Commission has also determined which household substances are required 
    to have the special packaging. 16 CFR 1700.14.
        Congress provided that to comply with the special packaging 
    requirements, a package must resist entry by most young children and 
    must be ``not difficult'' for ``normal adults'' to open and properly 
    resecure, within specified time periods. 15 U.S.C. 1471(4). The 
    Commission's existing regulations were developed before the widespread 
    use of CR packaging (``CRP'') and, therefore, without the benefit of 
    the actual use experience and test data that since have become 
    available.
        The current adult test protocol, 16 CFR 1700.20(a) (4) and (5), 
    specifies a test panel of 100 adults, ages 18 through 45 years. Seventy 
    percent of the adults must be females and 30 percent must be males. The 
    test period is 5 minutes. The adults are given the test package and 
    asked to open and then properly close the package. For a package to 
    meet the PPPA effectiveness criteria, at least 90 percent of the adults 
    must be able to open and, if appropriate, properly close the package 
    within the 5-minute test period. 16 CFR 1700.15(b)(2).
        Although the PPPA has significantly reduced the number of 
    poisonings of young children, deaths and injuries resulting from these 
    accidental ingestions continue to be a substantial problem. For 
    example, in 1993 alone, approximately 140,000 children under 5 years 
    old were treated in hospital emergency rooms for suspected or actual 
    poisonings. Also in 1993, poison control centers received reports of 
    more [[Page 12166]] than 6,000 poisonings of young children with 
    ``moderate'' or ``major'' (life-threatening) effects. In addition, 42 
    children died in these accidents in 1992, the last year for which the 
    Commission has complete data.
        During the more than 20 years since the PPPA was adopted, the 
    Commission has found that, contrary to requirements of the PPPA, 
    ``normal'' adults of all ages have difficulty using typical CRP. 
    Moreover, the Commission's data indicate that the difficulty in using 
    CRP results in a substantial number of accidental ingestions by young 
    children because adults purchase hazardous substances in non-CRP or 
    disable CRP by leaving the caps off or loose or transferring the 
    package contents to another container.
        Accordingly, the Commission sought to address the safety hazard 
    created by difficult to open CRP. On January 19, 1983, the Commission 
    published an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (``ANPR'') outlining 
    its concerns in this area and explaining and seeking comment on 
    possible actions to increase the proper use of CRP, to simplify the 
    test procedures, and to make the test procedures less affected by 
    possible variables. 48 FR 2389.
        Older adults typically have the most difficulty with CRP. 
    Therefore, in order to eliminate the currently-marketed CR package 
    designs that are most difficult for ``normal adults'' of all ages to 
    open, the Commission indicated that older adults, ages from 60-75 
    years, could be substituted for the current panel of 100 18-45-year-
    olds.
        After considering comments on the ANPR and other available 
    information, the Commission proposed amendments to the protocol to 
    address this problem. The proposed amendments would also change the 
    protocol to make the test results more consistent and make the child 
    test easier to perform. The Commission published its initial proposal 
    in the Federal Register of October 5, 1990, for public comment. 55 FR 
    40856.
        In addition to the requests for comments in January 1983 and 
    October 1990 noted above, the Commission announced additional comment 
    periods on March 5, 1991, (56 FR 9181) and March 21, 1994 (59 FR 
    13264). The Commission's staff evaluated the comments received in 
    response to each of these requests.
        On December 20, 1994, the Commission was briefed by its staff on 
    the comments on the proposed rule and the changes recommended by the 
    staff. On January 6, 1995, the Commission met and decided to approve 
    the rule recommended by the staff, but to exclude from the scope of the 
    rule those products that must be packaged in metal cans or aerosol 
    form. The staff made appropriate changes to the draft Federal Register 
    notice that would issue the final rule, and that notice was approved by 
    the Commission on February 6, 1995.
        Immediately thereafter, the Coalition for Responsible Packaging, an 
    industry group, raised concerns about the Commission's action. Most of 
    these concerns already had been addressed in the rulemaking proceeding. 
    Two concerns, however, had not been the subject of specific comments by 
    interested parties in this rulemaking.
        Specifically, the new comments can be summarized as follows. First, 
    in establishing an adult test panel consisting of adults aged 60-75, 
    the Commission allegedly exceeded its statutory authority to require 
    that child-resistant packaging not be difficult for ``normal adults'' 
    to use properly. Second, the rule allegedly addresses consumer 
    convenience, rather than safety, which the comment claims is not 
    properly the subject of a Commission regulation. In addition, the 
    second comment contends that to the extent that child-resistant 
    packages exist that will pass the ``senior friendly'' test approved by 
    the Commission, market forces will be an adequate and more appropriate 
    mechanism to ensure that the more convenient packaging will be adopted.
        The Commission wanted to assure that it had an opportunity to 
    consider these new arguments that had not previously been raised in the 
    rulemaking. Accordingly, on February 8, 1995, the Commission voted 
    unanimously to withhold publication of the Federal Register notice that 
    would have issued the final rule, to consider the new arguments.
        On February 21, 1995, the Commission published a Federal Register 
    notice announcing that written comments, limited to these two issues 
    only, could be submitted until March 7, 1995. 60 FR 9654. The 
    Commission has now decided to also receive oral comments on these two 
    new issues. Oral comments on these new issues alone may be presented to 
    the Commission at a Commission hearing beginning at 10:00 a.m., March 
    16, 1995.
        A request to present oral comments and an outline or text of the 
    comments must be received by the Commission on or before March 10, 
    1995. The oral comments shall be limited to 10 minutes per commenter. 
    The Commission reserves the right to further limit repetitious 
    comments. Comments addressing other issues will not be considered.
        The hearing will be held in the Commission's Hearing Room, 4330 
    East-West Highway, 4th Floor, Bethesda, MD 20814. Requests to present 
    oral comments and outlines or text of the comments shall be mailed to 
    the Office of the Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 
    Washington, D.C. 20207, or delivered to the Office of the Secretary, 
    Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 501, 4340 East-West Highway, 
    Bethesda, MD 20814.
    
        Dated: March 1, 1995.
    Sadye E. Dunn,
    Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
    [FR Doc. 95-5502 Filed 3-2-95; 11:42 am]
    BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/06/1995
Department:
Consumer Product Safety Commission
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Opportunity for presentation of oral public comments.
Document Number:
95-5502
Dates:
Oral comments limited to the new issues described below may be presented to the Commission at a Commission hearing beginning at 10:00 a.m., March 16, 1995. A request to present oral comments and an outline or text of the comments must be received by the Commission on or before March 10, 1995.
Pages:
12165-12166 (2 pages)
PDF File:
95-5502.pdf
CFR: (1)
16 CFR 1700