97-5461. Airworthiness Directives; Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation Model G-159 (G-I) Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 44 (Thursday, March 6, 1997)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 10228-10231]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-5461]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 97-NM-16-AD]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation Model 
    G-159 (G-I) Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes the supersedure of an existing 
    airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Gulfstream Model G-
    159 (G-I) airplanes, that currently requires modification and 
    repetitive inspections for cracks in the main landing gear (MLG) 
    retract cylinder attachment fittings. This action would require the 
    installation of improved attachment fittings which, when accomplished,
    
    [[Page 10229]]
    
    would terminate the requirement for the repetitive inspections. This 
    proposal is prompted by the development of a modification that 
    positively addresses the identified unsafe condition. The actions 
    specified by the proposed AD are intended to prevent failure of the MLG 
    retract cylinder attachment fitting due to fatigue cracking. That 
    condition, if not corrected, could result in the inability to retract 
    the MLG.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received by April 14, 1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-103, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 97-NM-16-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this location 
    between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
    holidays.
        The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be 
    obtained from Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation, Technical Operations 
    Department, P.O. Box 2206, M/S D-10, Savannah, Georgia 31402-2206. This 
    information may be examined at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 
    1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christina Marsh, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Airframe and Propulsion Branch, ACE-117A, FAA, Small Airplane 
    Directorate, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office, Campus Building, 
    1701 Columbia Avenue, Suite 2-160, College Park, Georgia 30337-2748; 
    telephone (404) 305-7362; fax (404) 305-7348.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with 
    the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket Number 97-NM-16-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-103, Attention: Rules 
    Docket No. 97-NM-16-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 
    98055-4056.
    
    Discussion
    
        In 1967, the FAA issued AD 67-31-08, amendment 39-515 (32 FR 16201, 
    November 28, 1967), applicable to certain Gulfstream Model G-159 
    airplanes, to require repetitive visual and dye penetrant inspections 
    for cracks in the main landing gear (MLG) retract cylinder attachment 
    fittings, part number (P/N) 159WM10032-1 and -2, located on the lower 
    surface of the left-hand and right-hand wings; and replacement of 
    cracked parts. It also requires that the fittings be modified by 
    rounding off their aft end edges.
        AD 67-31-08 also provided for an optional terminating action, which 
    consisted of replacing the MLG retract cylinder attachment fittings 
    with improved fittings, having Grumman P/N 159WM10276-1 and -2, and 
    balls having Grumman P/N 159WM10277-1.
        That action was prompted by a report indicating that, during a 
    routine inspection, the MLG retract cylinder attachment fitting on one 
    airplane was found to be cracked through the aft end. Examination of 
    the fitting revealed several notches located along one edge in the area 
    where the failure had occurred. This cracking in the fitting was 
    determined to be due to fatigue that could be directly attributed to 
    these notches.
        The requirements of that AD are intended to prevent failure of the 
    MLG retract cylinder attachment fitting due to fatigue cracking. This 
    condition, if not corrected, could result in the inability to retract 
    the MLG.
    
    Actions Since Issuance of Previous Rule
    
        As part of its on-going program to address issues relevant to the 
    continued operational safety of the aging transport fleet, the FAA, 
    along with Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation and several U.S. and non-
    U.S. operators of the affected airplanes, agreed to undertake the task 
    of identifying and implementing procedures to ensure the continuing 
    structural airworthiness of aging commuter-class airplanes. This group 
    reviewed selected customer bulletins and aircraft service changes, 
    applicable to Gulfstream Model G-159 airplanes, to be recommended for 
    mandatory rulemaking action to ensure the continued operational safety 
    of these airplanes.
    
    Explanation of Relevant Service Information
    
        The group reviewed and recommended Grumman Gulfstream Service 
    Change No. 184, dated February 1, 1968, and Amendment 1 to that Service 
    Change, dated June 28, 1968, for mandatory rulemaking action. This 
    service information describes procedures for removing MLG retract 
    cylinder attachment fitting assemblies made of aluminum alloy and 
    having P/N 159WM10032-1 and -2, and replacing them with fitting 
    assemblies made of steel and having P/N 159WM10276-1 and -2 and balls 
    having P/N 159WM10277-1. Installation of steel assemblies will preclude 
    the potential for fatigue cracking to occur in the fittings.
    
    Explanation of Requirements of Proposed Rule
    
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop on other products of this same type design, the 
    proposed AD would supersede AD 67-31-08. It would continue to require 
    the repetitive inspections and modification of the MLG retract cylinder 
    attachment fittings, and replacement, if necessary. This new action 
    would require that the attachment fitting assemblies eventually be 
    replaced with assemblies made of steel. Once this replacement is 
    accomplished, the previously required modification and inspections may 
    be terminated. The replacement action would be required to be 
    accomplished in accordance with the service information described 
    previously.
    
    FAA's Determination for the Need to Mandate the Replacement
    
        The FAA has determined that long term continued operational safety 
    will be better assured by design changes to remove the source of the 
    problem, rather than by repetitive inspections. Long term inspections 
    may not be providing the degree of safety assurance necessary for the 
    transport airplane fleet. This, coupled with a better understanding of 
    the human factors associated with numerous continual inspections, has 
    led
    
    [[Page 10230]]
    
    the FAA to consider placing less emphasis on inspections and more 
    emphasis on design improvements. The proposed replacement requirement 
    is in consonance with these considerations.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        There are approximately 146 Gulfstream Model G-159 (G-I) airplanes 
    of the affected design in the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 
    72 airplanes of U.S. registry would be affected by this proposed AD.
        The actions that are currently required by AD 67-31-08 take 
    approximately 3 work hours per airplane to accomplish, at an average 
    labor rate of $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost 
    impact of the currently required actions on U.S. operators is estimated 
    to be $12,960, or $180 per airplane, per inspection.
        The replacement action that is proposed in this AD action would 
    take approximately 45 work hours per airplane to accomplish, at an 
    average labor rate of $60 per work hour. Required parts would cost 
    approximately $5,400 per airplane. Based on these figures, the cost 
    impact of the proposed requirements of this AD on U.S. operators is 
    estimated to be $583,200, or $8,100 per airplane.
        The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions 
    that no operator has yet accomplished any of the current or proposed 
    requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish 
    those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed 
    regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
    Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT 
    Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 
    and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact, 
    positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under 
    the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft 
    regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the 
    Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules 
    Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing amendment 39-515 (32 FR 
    16201, November 28, 1967), and by adding a new airworthiness directive 
    (AD), to read as follows:
    
    Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation (formerly Grumman): Docket 97-NM-
    16-AD. Supersedes AD 67-31-08, amendment 39-515.
    
        Applicability: Model G-159 (G-I) airplanes; serial numbers (S/N) 
    1 through 12 inclusive, 14 through 112 inclusive, 114 through 148 
    inclusive, 322, and 323; on which main landing gear cylinder attach 
    fitting assemblies having part number (P/N) 159WM10276-1 and -2 and 
    balls having P/N 159WM10277-1 are not installed; certificated in any 
    category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (d)(1) 
    of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect 
    of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent failure of the main landing gear (MLG) retract 
    cylinder attachment fittings due to fatigue cracking, which could 
    result in the inability to retract the MLG, accomplish the 
    following:
        (a) Accomplish the actions specified in paragraphs (a)(1) and 
    (a)(2) of this AD, at the times indicated in those paragraphs and in 
    accordance with Grumman Gulfstream Customer Bulletin No. 172, dated 
    September 6, 1963.
        (1) Beginning November 7, 1967 (the effective date of AD 67-31-
    08, amendment 39-515), and prior to each flight, conduct a visual 
    inspection to detect cracks in the MLG retract cylinder attachment 
    fittings on the lower surface of the right-hand and left-hand wings 
    in the vicinity of the aft end of the fitting.
        (2) Within 25 hours time-in-service after November 7, 1967, 
    accomplish the actions specified in paragraphs (a)(2)(i) and 
    (a)(2)(ii) of this AD:
        (i) Conduct a dye penetrant inspection, in conjunction with at 
    least a 10X magnifying glass, to detect cracks in the MLG retract 
    cylinder attachment fittings on the lower surface of the right-hand 
    and left-hand wings in the vicinity of the aft end of the fitting. 
    Repeat this inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 25 
    hours time-in-service. And
        (ii) Modify the aft end edges of the fitting by rounding them 
    off to approximately 1/32'' radius.
        (b) If any crack is found during an inspection required by 
    paragraph (a) of this AD, prior to further flight, accomplish either 
    paragraph (b)(1) or (b)(2) of this AD:
        (1) Replace the cracked part with a part of the same part number 
    that has been modified and inspected in accordance with paragraph 
    (a) of this AD, in accordance with Grumman Gulfstream Customer 
    Bulletin No. 172, dated September 6, 1963. Thereafter, continue the 
    inspections required by paragraph (a) of this AD. Or
        (2) Replace the fitting assembly with an assembly having part 
    number (P/N) 159WM10276-1 or -2, and balls having P/N 159WM10277-1. 
    After accomplishing this replacement, the repetitive inspections of 
    that fitting required by paragraph (a) of this AD may be terminated.
        (c) Within 400 hours time-in-service after the effective date of 
    this AD, replace the MLG retract cylinder attachment fitting 
    assemblies with assemblies having part numbers (P/N) 159WM10276-1 
    and -2, and balls having P/N 159WM10277-1. This replacement 
    constitutes terminating action for the inspection requirements of 
    this AD.
        (d)(1) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Atlanta Aircraft Certification 
    Office (ACO), FAA, Small Airplane Directorate. Operators shall 
    submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal 
    Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
    Manager, Atlanta ACO.
        (2) Alternative methods of compliance, approved previously in 
    accordance with AD 67-31-08, amendment 39-515, are approved as 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Atlanta ACO.
    
        (e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
    
    [[Page 10231]]
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 27, 1997.
    Darrell M. Pederson,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 97-5461 Filed 3-5-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/06/1997
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
97-5461
Dates:
Comments must be received by April 14, 1997.
Pages:
10228-10231 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 97-NM-16-AD
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
97-5461.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13