96-5403. Pacifica Funds Trust, et al.; Notice of Application  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 46 (Thursday, March 7, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 9211-9213]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-5403]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Investment Company Act Release No. IC-21794; 812-9986]
    
    
    Pacifica Funds Trust, et al.; Notice of Application
    
    March 1, 1996.
    AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'').
    
    ACTION: Notice of Application for Exemption under the Investment 
    Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act'').
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    APPLICANTS: Pacifica Funds Trust and Pacifica Variable Trust (the 
    ``Trusts''), on behalf of their separate investment portfolios 
    (``Funds''), and First Interstate Capital Management, Inc. 
    (``Adviser'').
    
    RELEVANT ACT SECTIONS: Order requested under section 6(c) for an 
    exemption from section 15(a).
    
    SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: First Interstate Bancorp (``First 
    Interstate''), the Adviser's indirect holding company, will be merged 
    with Wells Fargo & Company (``Wells Fargo''). The merger will result in 
    the assignment, and thus the termination, of the Funds' existing 
    investment advisory agreements (``Existing Advisory Agreements'') with 
    the Adviser. Applicants request an order to permit the implementation, 
    without shareholder approval, of interim advisory agreements (the ``New 
    Advisory Agreements'') during a period not to exceed 120 days beginning 
    with the earlier of the consummation date of the merger (the 
    ``Effective Date'') or May 1, 1996, and ending with shareholder 
    approval or disapproval of the New Advisory Agreements (the ``Interim 
    Period''). The order also will permit the Adviser to receive fees 
    earned during the Interim Period following approval by the Funds' 
    shareholders.
    
    FILING DATE: The application was filed on February 9, 1996, and amended 
    on February 29, 1996.
    
    HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An order granting the application 
    will be issued unless the SEC orders a hearing. Interested persons may 
    request a hearing by writing to the SEC's Secretary and serving 
    applicant with a copy of the request, personally or by mail. Hearing 
    requests should be received by the SEC by 5:30 p.m. on March 26, 1996, 
    and should be accompanied by proof of service on applicant, in the form 
    of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service. Hearing 
    requests should state the nature of the writer's interest, the reason 
    for the request, and the issues contested. Persons may request 
    notification of a hearing by writing to the SEC's Secretary.
    
    ADDRESSES: Secretary, SEC, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549. 
    Applicants: The Trusts, 237 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10017; the 
    Adviser, 7501 McCormick Parkway, Scottsdale, Arizona 85258.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mercer E. Bullard, Staff Attorney, 
    (202) 942-0565, or Alison E. Baur, Branch Chief, (202) 942-0564 
    (Division of Investment Management, Office of Investment Company 
    Regulation).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the 
    application. The complete application may be obtained for a fee at the 
    SEC's Public Reference Branch.
    
    [[Page 9212]]
    
    Applicants' Representations
    
        1. Pacifica Funds Trust is a Massachusetts business trust that is 
    registered as an open-end management investment company under the Act. 
    It is organized as a series investment company and currently offers 
    twenty-three Funds to the public. Pacifica Variable Trust is a Delaware 
    business trust that is registered as an open-end management investment 
    company under the Act. It is organized as a series company and 
    currently offers five Funds to purchasers of variable annuity contracts 
    investing in a separate account established and maintained by Anchor 
    National Life Insurance Company, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of 
    SunAmerica, Inc. The Adviser is a wholly-owned subsidiary of First 
    Interstate Bank of California, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of 
    First Interstate, a multi-bank holding company. The Adviser currently 
    serves as investment adviser to all of the Funds.
        2. On January 24, 1996, First Interstate and Wells Fargo entered 
    into an Agreement, pursuant to which First Interstate will be merged 
    with and into Wells Fargo (the ``Merger''). Wells Fargo will be the 
    surviving corporation. Applicants have set March 28, 1996, as the date 
    the respective shareholders of First Interstate and Wells Fargo will 
    vote on whether to approve the Merger. Applicants anticipate that the 
    Merger will occur between April 1, 1996 and May 1, 1996.
        3. At a regularly scheduled meeting held on February 22, 1996, the 
    respective Boards of Trustees of the Trusts (``Boards'') met to discuss 
    the Merger. During this meeting, the Boards, including a majority of 
    the Board members who are not ``interested persons'' (as that term is 
    defined in the Act) of the respective Trusts (the ``Independent 
    Trustees''), with the advice and assistance of counsel to the 
    Independent Trustees and to the Trusts, made a full evaluation of the 
    New Advisory Agreements. In accordance with section 15(c) of the act, 
    the Boards voted to approve the New Advisory Agreements. In approving 
    the New Advisory Agreements, the Boards considered that each such 
    Agreement would have the same terms and conditions as the respective 
    Existing Advisory Agreement except for the effective and termination 
    dates, and that the Adviser would provide investment advisory and other 
    services to the Funds during the Interim Period of a scope and quality 
    at least equivalent to the scope and quality of services currently 
    provided to the Funds. The Board of each Trust also voted to recommend 
    that the shareholders of each Fund approve the related New Advisory 
    Agreement.
        4. In approving the New Advisory Agreements, the Boards concluded 
    that payment of the advisory fee during the Interim Period would be 
    appropriate and fair because there will be no diminution in the scope 
    and quality of services provided to the Funds, the fees to be paid will 
    be unchanged from the fees paid under the Existing Advisory Agreements, 
    the fees will be maintained in an interest-bearing escrow account until 
    payment is approved or disapproved by shareholders, and the nonpayment 
    of fees would be inequitable to the Adviser in view of the substantial 
    services to be provided.
    
    Applicants' Legal Analysis
    
        1. Section 15(a) of the Act prohibits any person from acting as 
    investment adviser to a registered investment company except under a 
    written contract that, among other things, provides for its automatic 
    termination in the event of an assignment and has been approved by a 
    majority of the company's outstanding voting securities. Section 
    2(a)(4) of the Act defines ``assignment'' to include any direct or 
    indirect transfer of a contract by the assignor or of a controlling 
    block of the assignor's outstanding voting securities by a security 
    holder of the assignor. Section 2(a)(9) of the Act defines ``control'' 
    as the power to exercise a controlling influence over the management or 
    policies of a company. Beneficial ownership of more than 25% of a 
    company's voting securities is presumed to constitute control.
        2. Upon consummation of the Merger, many management changes are 
    expected to occur. The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of First 
    Interstate will not succeed to any position in Wells Fargo, the 
    surviving corporation. In addition, the Adviser will become a wholly-
    owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo. Applicants believe, therefore, that it 
    is reasonable to conclude that the Merger will result in an 
    ``assignment'' of the Existing Advisory Agreements and that the 
    contracts will terminate by their terms on the Effective Date.
        3. Rule 15a-4 provides, among other things, that if an advisory 
    contract is terminated by assignment, the investment adviser may 
    confine to act as such for 120 days at the previous compensation rate 
    if a new contract is approved by the board of directors of the 
    investment company, and if the investment adviser or a controlling 
    person of the investment adviser does not directly or indirectly 
    receive money or other benefit in connection with the assignment. 
    Because the shareholders of First Interstate will receive a benefit in 
    connection with the assignment of the Existing Advisory Agreements, 
    applicants may not rely on the rule.
        4. Section 6(c) of the Act provides that the SEC may exempt any 
    person, security, or transaction from any provision of the Act if and 
    to the extent that such exemption is necessary or appropriate in the 
    public interest and consistent with the protection of investors and the 
    purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the Act. 
    Applicants believe that the requested relief meets this standard.
        5. Applicants maintain that because the Funds did not have 
    sufficient advance notice of the Merger, given the uncertainty 
    surrounding the events leading up to the Merger and the setting of the 
    Effective Date, it will not be possible for the Funds to obtain 
    shareholder approval of the New Advisory Agreements in accordance with 
    section 15(a) of the 1940 Act prior to the closing of the Merger. In 
    this regard, Applicants assert that the terms and timing of the Merger 
    were determined by First Interstate and Wells Fargo in response to a 
    number of factors relating principally to their commercial banking and 
    other similar business concerns.
        6. Applicants also assert that it is likely that one or more Funds 
    will be merged into a corresponding fund of the Wells Fargo family of 
    funds during or by the end of the Interim Period. Applicants maintain 
    that the 120-day period requested by the Application would facilitate 
    the orderly and reasonable consideration of the New Advisory Agreements 
    by the shareholders, as well as the possible fund reorganization, by 
    allowing one proxy solicitation to be conducted, in which shareholders 
    will be presented with one overall plan of reorganization of the funds 
    and the New Advisory Agreements for approval. Applicants contend that 
    proceeding in this manner would benefit shareholders of the Funds 
    because it would reduce costs and minimize any shareholder confusion 
    that might arise in the circumstances.
    
    Applicants' Conditions
    
        Applicants agree, as conditions to the requested exemptive relief, 
    that:
        1. Each New Advisory Agreements will have the same terms and 
    conditions as the respective Existing Advisory Agreements, except for 
    the effective and termination dates.
        2. Fees earned by the Adviser and paid by a Fund during the Interim 
    Period in accordance with a New
    
    [[Page 9213]]
    
    Advisory Agreements will be maintained in an interest-bearing escrow 
    account, and amounts in such account (including interest earned on such 
    paid fees) will be paid to the Adviser only upon the approval of the 
    related Fund shareholders or, in the absence of such approval, to the 
    related Fund.
        3. Each Trust will hold meetings of shareholders to vote on the 
    approval of the New Advisory Agreements for the Funds on or before the 
    120th day following the earlier of the termination of the Existing 
    Advisory Agreements on the Effective Date or May 1, 1996.
        4. First Interstate and/or one or more of its subsidiaries will pay 
    the costs of preparing and filing this Application. First Interstate 
    and/or one or more of its subsidiaries will pay the costs relating to 
    the solicitation of the Fund shareholder approvals, to the extent such 
    costs relate to approval of the New Advisory Agreements necessitated by 
    the Merger.
        5. The Adviser will take all appropriate actions to ensure that the 
    scope and quality of advisory and other services provided to the Funds 
    under the New Advisory Agreements will be at least equivalent, in the 
    judgment of the respective Boards, including a majority of the 
    Independent Trustees, to the scope and quality of services provided 
    previously. In the event of any material change in personnel providing 
    services pursuant to the New Advisory Agreements, the Adviser will 
    apprise and consult the Boards of the affected Funds to assure that 
    such Boards, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, are 
    satisfied that the services provided by the Adviser will not be 
    diminished in scope or quality.
    
        For the SEC, by the Division of Investment Management, under 
    delegated authority.
    Maragret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 96-5403 Filed 3-6-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/07/1996
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of Application for Exemption under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act'').
Document Number:
96-5403
Dates:
The application was filed on February 9, 1996, and amended on February 29, 1996.
Pages:
9211-9213 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Investment Company Act Release No. IC-21794, 812-9986
PDF File:
96-5403.pdf