95-5637. Petitions for Exemption: Summary of Petitions Received; Dispositions of Petitions Issued  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 8, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 12815-12816]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-5637]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    [Summary Notice No. PE-95-10]
    
    
    Petitions for Exemption: Summary of Petitions Received; 
    Dispositions of Petitions Issued
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of petitions for exemption received and of dispositions 
    of prior petitions.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA's rulemaking provisions governing the 
    application, processing, and disposition of petitions for exemption (14 
    CFR Part 11), this notice contains a summary of certain petitions 
    seeking relief from specified requirements of the Federal Aviation 
    Regulations (14 CFR Chapter I), dispositions of certain petitions 
    previously received, and corrections. The purpose of this notice is to 
    improve the public's awareness of, and participation in, this aspect of 
    FAA's regulatory activities. Neither publication of this notice nor the 
    inclusion or omission of information in the summary is intended to 
    affect the legal status of any petition or its final disposition.
    
    DATES: Comments on petitions received must identify the petition docket 
    number involved and must be received on or before March 28, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Send comments on any petition in triplicate to: Federal 
    Aviation Administration, Office of the Chief Counsel, Attn: Rule Docket 
    (AGC-200), Petition Docket No. ____________, 800 Independence Avenue, 
    SW., Washington, D.C. 20591.
        The petition, any comments received, and a copy of any final 
    disposition are filed in the assigned regulatory docket and are 
    available for examination in the Rules Docket (AGC-200), Room 915G, FAA 
    Headquarters Building (FOB 10A), 800 Indpendence Avenue, SW., 
    Washington, D.C. 20591; telephone (202) 267-3132.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. D. Michael Smith, Office of 
    Rulemaking (ARM-1), Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence 
    Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267-7470.
        This notice is published pursuant to paragraphs (c), (e), and (g) 
    of Sec. 11.27 of Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 
    Part 11).
    
        Issued in Washington, DC, on February 27, 1995.
    Donald P. Byrne,
    Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations.
    
    Petitions for Exemption
    
    Docket No.: 24466
    Petitioner: Air Transport Association
    Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 121.485
    Description of Relief Sought: To extend Exemption No. 4317, as amended, 
    which permits member carriers of the Air Transport Association to 
    conduct flights of fewer than 12 hours duration with an airplane having 
    a crew of three or more pilots and an additional flight crewmember 
    without requiring the rest period following that flight to be twice the 
    hours flown since the last rest period at his/her home base.
    
    Docket No.: 28010
    Petitioner: General Electric Company
    Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 21.128(a)(2)
    Description of Relief Sought: To permit General Electric to deliver 
    certain pre-type-certificated prototype engines (CFM56-5C4) 
    manufactured and assembled under conformity configuration control, 
    without subjecting the engine to a test run that includes at least 5 
    hours of operation at rated maximum continuous power or thrust. For 
    engines having a rated takeoff power or thrust higher than rated 
    maximum continuous power or thrust, the 5-hour run must include 30 
    minutes at rated takeoff power or thrust.
    
    Dispositions of Petitions
    
    Docket No.: 23453
    Petitioner: Hawaiian Airlines
    Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 108.5(a)(1)
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit Hawaiian Airlines 
    to utilize its DC-9 aircraft without a security program that meets the 
    requirements of Sec. 108.7. The DC- [[Page 12816]] 9 aircraft would be 
    a last minute replacement for its DASH-7 equipment. Hawaiian Airlines 
    has confirmed that this exemption is no longer necessary; therefore, 
    this current exemption documents the termination of the original 
    exemption. Termination, February 8, 1995, Exemption No. 3796A
    
    Docket No.: 23980
    Petitioner: United States Hang Gliding Association, Inc.
    Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 103.1
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To amend Exemption No. 4144, 
    as amended, which allows unpowered ultralight vehicles to be towed 
    aloft by powered ultralight vehicles operated by individuals authorized 
    by the United States Hang Gliding Association, Inc. The amendment would 
    have allowed an increase to the weight limit for single-place powered 
    ultralight vehicles, used in air-to-air towing operations only, up to 
    360 pounds empty weight. Additionally, this petition would have allowed 
    an increase to the weight limit for two-place powered ultralight 
    vehicles, used in air-to-air towing operations only, up to 496 pounds 
    empty weight. Exemption No. 4144, as amended, stand as is; the 
    amendment is denied. Denied, February 10, 1995, Exemption No. 6024
    
    Docket No.: 26067
    Petitioner: SimuFlite Training International
    Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR appendix H of part 121; 135.293; 
    135.297; 135.299; 135.303; 135.337(a)(2), (a)(3), and (b)(2); and 
    135.339(a)(2), (b), and (c)
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To extend and amend Exemption 
    No. 5187B, which permits SimuFlite, subject to certain conditions and 
    limitations, to use its qualified instructor pilots or pilot check 
    airmen in approved simulators to train and check the pilots of part 135 
    certificate holders that contract with SimuFlite for training. The 
    amendment restores the conditions and limitations that existed prior to 
    the issuance of Exemption No. 5187B, except for some minor 
    clarifications. Grant, February 2, 1995, Exemption No. 5187C
    
    Docket No.: 26302
    Petitioner: FlightSafety International
    Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR appendix H of part 121; 135.293; 
    135.297; 135.299; 135.337(a)(2), (a)(3), and (b)(2); and 135.339(a)(2), 
    (b), and (c)
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To extend and amend Exemption 
    No. 5241D, which permits FlightSafety International (FSI), subject to 
    certain conditions and limitations, to use its qualified instructor 
    pilots or pilot check airmen in approved simulators to train and check 
    the pilots of part 135 certificate holders that contract with FSI for 
    training. The amendment restores the conditions and limitations that 
    existed prior to the issuance of Exemption No. 5241D, except for some 
    minor clarifications. Grant, February 1, 1995, Exemption No. 5241E
    
    Docket No.: 27121
    Petitioner: Tower Air
    Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR appendix H of part 121
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To extend and amend Exemption 
    No. 5596, as amended, which allows Tower Air to provide initial or 
    upgrade training and checking in a Phase II (Level C) simulator and 
    allows certain experienced pilots and flight engineers who have 
    received training in a Phase II (Level C) simulator to be B747 seconds 
    in command (SIC) in accordance with the training and checking 
    provisions permitted under Phase III (Level D) of appendix H. The 
    amendment revises the exemption to permit former military pilots with 
    large turbojet experience to be trained and checked in a B747 Phase II 
    (Level C) simulator without receiving any training or checking in the 
    actual aircraft. Grant, February 3, 1995, Exemption No. 5596C
    
    Docket No.: 27947
    Petitioner: Jet Support Systems, Inc.
    Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 135.165(b)(6) and (7)
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To allow Jet Support Systems, 
    Inc., to operate turbojet aircraft in extended overwater operations 
    equipped with one high frequency communication system. Grant, February 
    8, 1995, Exemption No. 6026
    
    Docket No.: 27968
    Petitioner: Corporate Air
    Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 121.345(c)(2) and 135.143(c)(2)
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit Corporate Air to 
    operate without a TSO-C112 (Mode S) transponder installed on its 
    aircraft operating under the provision of parts 121 and 135. Grant, 
    February 7, 1995, Exemption No. 6025
    
    Docket No.: 27960
    Petitioner: Atlas Air Inc.
    Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR appendix H of part 121
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To extend and amend Exemption 
    No. 5888, which allows Atlas Air Inc., to provide initial or upgrade 
    training and checking in a Phase II (Level C) simulator and allows 
    certain experienced pilots and flight engineers who have received 
    training in a Phase II (Level C) simulator to be B-747 seconds in 
    command (SIC) in accordance with the training and checking provisions 
    permitted under Phase III (Level D) of appendix H. The amendment 
    revises paragraph 4.a of the conditions and limitations to require two 
    manual takeoffs and landings instead of the four manual takeoffs and 
    landings currently required. Partial Grant, February 3, 1995, Exemption 
    No. 5888A
    
    Docket No.: 28058
    Petitioner: Blackhawk International Airways
    Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 135.143(c)(2)
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit Blackhawk 
    International Airways to operate without a TSO-C112 (Mode S) 
    transponder installed on its aircraft operating under the provisions of 
    part 135. Grant, February 3, 1995, Exemption No. 6022
    
    Docket No.: 27859
    Petitioner: Professional Airline Training, Inc.
    Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 61.55(b)(2); 61.56(c)(1); 61.57(c) 
    and (d); 61.58(c)(1) and (d); 61.63(c)(2) and (d)(2) and (3); 61.65(c), 
    (e)(2) and (3), and (g); 61.67(d)(2); 61.157(d)(1) and (2) and (e)(1) 
    and (2); 61.191(c); and appendix A of part 61
    Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit Professional 
    Airline Training, Inc., to use FAA-approved simulators to meet certain 
    flight experience requirements of part 61 of the FAR. Grant, February 
    3, 1995, Exemption No. 5988
    
    [FR Doc. 95-5637 Filed 3-7-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
03/08/1995
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of petitions for exemption received and of dispositions of prior petitions.
Document Number:
95-5637
Dates:
Comments on petitions received must identify the petition docket number involved and must be received on or before March 28, 1995.
Pages:
12815-12816 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Summary Notice No. PE-95-10
PDF File:
95-5637.pdf