[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 45 (Monday, March 9, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11432-11433]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-5956]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. GP98-13-000]
Mobil Oil Corporation; Notice of Offer of Settlement and Call for
the Protection of Rights Pending Adjudication or Settlement
March 3, 1998.
Take notice that on February 24, 1998, Mobil Oil Corporation
(Mobil), alleging compliance with the Commission's January 28, 1998
Order Clarifying Procedures (82 FERC para. 61,059), filed an offer of
settlement with the Commission, and called for the protection of its
rights pending adjudication or settlement, with respect to Mobil's
Kansas ad valorem tax refund obligation to Williams Gas Pipelines
Central, Inc., formerly: Williams Natural Gas Company (Williams),
identified in the State of Refunds Due filed by Williams in Docket No
RP98-52-000. Mobil's pleading is on file with the Commission and,
except for Mobil's confidential offer of settlement, is open to public
inspection.
Mobil contends that the Commission has established a procedure to
follow, under 18 CFR 385.602 of the Commission's regulations, when
informal settlement or reconciliation efforts fail, and that it has
complied with the requisites of that Section. Mobil suggests that a
Settlement Judge be appointed, that Mobil's refund obligation to
Williams be held in abeyance and that interest be tolled, on the basis
that Mobil has a constitutional and statutory right to a hearing before
it may be deprived of property i.e., the 1983-1988 Kansas ad valorem
tax reimbursement dollars that Mobil previously collected from
Williams. Mobil further alleges that it made a settlement offer to
Williams, and that Williams rejected that offer.
Mobil also requests a full and fair hearing, and claims that there
are contested issues of material fact (measurable in dollars) on which
Williams and Mobil disagree. Mobil further argues that these issues
must be adjudicated. Mobil's alleged issues of material fact include:
[[Page 11433]]
(1) The amount of dollars of revenue Mobil collected for the sale
of its gas in each relevant time period;
(2) How much (if any) of the dollars Mobil collected were in excess
of the maximum lawful price (MLP) in each relevant time period;
(3) How much (if any) of the excess dollars collected by Mobil were
actually paid by customers of interstate pipelines through the
pipeline's PGA process, i.e., how much were the pipeline's customers
overcharged; and
(4) Assuming that part of the refund amount is interest, then when
did the interstate pipeline customers begin paying a fraction of the
amounts determined to be in excess of the MLP, which Mobil contends
will govern the amount of interest owned.
Mobil's pleading includes its claim that it has complied with the
Commission's orders requiring a statement of its basic principles for
rejecting Williams' refund claim, and Mobil's privileged and
confidential offer of settlement to Williams (Mobil's Attachment A).
Mobil also provides its own assessment as to how to compute the correct
refund amount.
The procedural rules governing settlements are set forth in Section
385.602 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. Under
Section 385.602(f), any person wishing to make comments with respect to
an offer of settlement must do so not later than 20 day after the date
the settlement offer was filed. Reply comments must be filed not later
than 30 days after the date the settlement offer was filed.
Accordingly, any person desiring to file comments with respect to
Mobil's offer of settlement should file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, by
March 16, 1998, in accordance with the requirements of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure [18 CFR 385.602(f)].
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-5956 Filed 3-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
