97-8183. Approval of Section 112(l) Program of Delegation; Wisconsin  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 62 (Tuesday, April 1, 1997)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 15402-15404]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-8183]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    40 CFR Part 63
    
    [WI73-01-7302(b); FRL-5691-7]
    
    
    Approval of Section 112(l) Program of Delegation; Wisconsin
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Direct final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: EPA is approving, through a ``direct final'' procedure, 
    Wisconsin's request for delegation of the Federal air toxics program 
    contained within 40 CFR Parts 61 and 63 pursuant to Section 112(l) of 
    the Clean Air Act (CAA) as amended. The State's requested mechanism of 
    delegation involves either the delegation of all existing and future 
    Section 112 standards as federally promulgated, for promulgation as 
    State standards (or rules), or to incorporate Federal standards into 
    State air pollution control permits, reserving the right to promulgate 
    the standards as a State rule at a later time. The actual delegation of 
    authority will occur through a memorandum of agreement (MOA) between 
    the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) and EPA. This 
    request for approval of the mechanism of delegation encompasses all 
    sources not covered by the 40 CFR Part 70 operating permit program.
    
    DATES: This action will become effective June 2, 1997, unless adverse 
    or critical comments not previously addressed by the State or EPA are 
    received by May 1, 1997. If the effective date is delayed, timely 
    notice will be published in the Federal Register.
    
    ADDRESSES: Copies of the State's submittal and other supporting 
    information used in developing the approval are available for 
    inspection during normal business hours at the following location: EPA 
    Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, AR-18J, Chicago, Illinois, 60604. 
    Please contact Constantine Blathras at (312) 886-0671 to arrange a time 
    if inspection of the submittal is desired.
        Effective immediately, all notifications, reports and other 
    correspondence required under Section 112 standards should be sent to 
    the State of Wisconsin rather than to the EPA, Region 5, in Chicago. 
    Affected sources should send this information to:
    
        Bureau of Air Management, Wisconsin Department of Natural 
    Resources, 101 South Webster Street, P.O. Box 7921, Madison, 
    Wisconsin 53707.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Constantine Blathras, AR-18J, 77 West 
    Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois, 60604, (312) 886-0671.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Background and Purpose
    
        Section 112(l) of the CAA enables the EPA to approve State air 
    toxics programs or rules to operate in place of the Federal air toxics 
    program. The Federal air toxics program implements the requirements 
    found in Section 112 of the CAA pertaining to the regulation of 
    hazardous air pollutants. Approval of an air toxics program is granted 
    by the EPA if the Agency finds that the State program: (1) Is ``no less 
    stringent'' than the corresponding Federal program or rule, (2) the 
    State has adequate authority and resources to implement the program, 
    (3) the schedule for implementation and compliance is sufficiently 
    expeditious, and (4) the program is otherwise in compliance with 
    Federal guidance. Once approval is granted, the air toxics program can 
    be implemented and enforced by State or local agencies, as well as EPA. 
    Implementation by local agencies is dependent upon appropriate 
    subdelegation.
        On December 22, 1995, Wisconsin submitted to EPA a request for 
    delegation of authority to implement and enforce the air toxics program 
    under Section 112 of the CAA. On March 28, 1996, EPA found the State's 
    submittal complete. In this document EPA is taking final action to 
    approve the program of delegation for Wisconsin.
    
    II. Review of State Submittal
    
    A. Program Summary
    
        Requirements for approval, specified in Section 112(l)(5), require 
    that a State's program contain adequate authorities, adequate resources 
    for implementation, and an expeditious compliance schedule. These 
    requirements are also requirements for an adequate operating permits 
    program under Part 70 (40 CFR 70.4). EPA promulgated a final interim 
    approval under Part 70 of the State of Wisconsin's Operating Permit 
    Program on March 6, 1995 (60 FR 12128-12137). The notice included the 
    approval of a mechanism for delegation of all Section 112 standards for 
    sources subject to the Part 70 program. Sources subject to the Part 70 
    program are those sources that are operating pursuant to a Part 70 
    permit issued by the State or EPA. Sources not subject to the Part 70 
    program are those sources that are not required to obtain a Part 70 
    permit from either the State or EPA. This action supplements the Part 
    70 rulemaking in that Wisconsin will have the authority to implement 
    and enforce the Section 112 air toxics program regardless of a source's 
    Part 70 applicability. The Wisconsin program of delegation for sources 
    not subject to Part 70 will not include delegation of Section 112(r) 
    authority nor Section 112(i)(5) Early Reductions Program authority.
        As stated above, this document constitutes EPA's approval of 
    Wisconsin's program of delegation of all existing and future air toxics 
    standards, except for Section 112(i)(5) and Section 112(r) standards as 
    they pertain to non-Part 70 sources. The Wisconsin program of 
    delegation will operate as follows: For a future Section 112 standard 
    for which WDNR intends to accept straight delegation, EPA will delegate 
    the authority to implement a Section 112 standard to the State by 
    letter unless WDNR notifies EPA differently within 45 days of EPA final 
    promulgation of the standard. WDNR will as expeditiously as practicable 
    and, if possible, within 18 months of the promulgation by EPA of a 
    Section 112 standard which is applicable to non-Part 70 sources, adopt 
    such standard into the State air quality regulations. Upon completion 
    of such regulatory action, WDNR will submit to EPA proof of adoption. 
    EPA shall respond with a letter delegating enforcement authority to the 
    WDNR with respect to the adopted standard.
        For a source category for which Wiconsin wishes to adopt its own 
    rules, WDNR shall submit for approval to EPA State rules varying from 
    the Federal
    
    [[Page 15403]]
    
    standard, as expeditiously as practicable, and if possible within 18 
    months of promulgation by EPA of a Section 12 standard applicable to 
    non-Part 70 sources. EPA will review such rules for approvability 
    pursuant to Section 112(l) and will rulemake on them.
        Wisconsin will assume responsibility for the timely implementation 
    and enforcement required by the standard, as well as any further 
    activities agreed to by WDNR and EPA. However, EPA at all times retains 
    its authority to enforce all provisions of Section 112 standards and 
    requirements. Further, until WDNR obtains the authority necessary to 
    enforce Section 112 standards, EPA shall initiate enforcement action 
    when enforcement is in the best interest of the State, the general 
    public, or EPA, or when delayed enforcement would impose an undue level 
    of risk on the general public and/or the environment.
        Some activities necessary for effective implementation of the 
    standard include receipt of initial notifications, recordkeeping, 
    reporting and generally assuring that sources subject to the standard 
    are aware of its existence. When deemed appropriate, WDNR will utilize 
    the resources of its Small Business Assistance Program to assist in 
    general program implementation. The details of this delegation 
    mechanism are set forth in a memorandum of agreement between EPA and 
    WDNR, copies of which are located in the docket associated with this 
    rulemaking.
    
    B. Criteria for Approval
    
        On November 26, 1993, EPA promulgated regulations to provide 
    guidance relating to the approval of State programs under Section 
    112(l) of the CAA, (40 FR 62262). That rulemaking outlined the 
    requirements of approval with respect to various delegation options. 
    The requirements for approval of a program to implement and enforce 
    Federal Section 112 rules as promulgated without changes are found at 
    40 CFR 63.91. The specific elements required for approval in Section 
    63.91 were promulgated to address the procedures required for approval 
    pursuant to Section 112(l)(5) of the CAA. Any request for approval must 
    meet all Section 112(l) approval criteria, as well as all approval 
    criteria of Section 63.91. A more detailed analysis of the State's 
    submittal pursuant to Section 63.91 is contained in the Technical 
    Support Document included in the official file of this rulemaking.
        Under Section 112(l) of the CAA, approval of a State program is 
    granted by the EPA if the Agency finds that it: (1) is ``no less 
    stringent'' than the corresponding Federal program, (2) that the State 
    has adequate authority and resources to implement the program, (3) the 
    schedule for implementation and compliance is sufficiently expeditious, 
    and (4) the program is otherwise in compliance with Federal guidance.
    
    C. Analysis
    
        EPA is approving Wisconsin's `mechanism of delegation' because the 
    State's submittal meets all requirements necessary for approval under 
    Section 112(l). The first requirement is that the program be no less 
    stringent than the Federal program. The Wisconsin program is no less 
    stringent than the corresponding Federal program or rule because the 
    State has requested either (1) delegation of standards unchanged from 
    the Federal standards and adopting such standards into the State air 
    quality regulations, or (2) that WDNR shall submit for approval to EPA, 
    State rules varying from the Federal standard. EPA will review such 
    rules for approvability pursuant to Section 112(l) and will rulemake on 
    them.
        Second, the State has shown that it has adequate authority and 
    resources to implement the program. Wisconsin's State Statutes 
    authorize the WDNR to issue construction and operating permits to Part 
    70 and non-Part 70 sources of regulated pollutants to assure compliance 
    with all applicable requirements of the CAA. The authority to issue 
    permits includes the authority to incorporate permit conditions that 
    implement Federal Section 112 standards. Furthermore, Wisconsin has the 
    authority to implement each Section 112 regulation, emission standard 
    or requirement (regardless of Part 70 applicability), perform 
    inspections, request compliance information, incorporate requirements 
    into permits, and bring civil and criminal enforcement actions to 
    recover penalties and fines. Finally, Wisconsin has the authority to 
    enforce each Section 112 regulation, emission standard or requirement 
    applicable to non-Part 70 sources upon incorporation into the State 
    code of regulations. WDNR will enforce Section 112 standards applicable 
    to Part 70 sources by including such Section 112 standards in State 
    operating permits when they are issued or updated. Adequate resources 
    will be obtained through Section 105 grant monies awarded to States by 
    EPA and through any monies from the State's Title V program that can be 
    used to fund acceptable Title V activities with respect to these non-
    Part 70 sources.
        Third, upon promulgation of a standard, Wisconsin will immediately 
    begin activities necessary for timely implementation of the standard. 
    These activities will involve identifying sources subject to the 
    applicable requirement and notifying these sources of the applicable 
    requirement. Such schedule is sufficiently expeditious for approval.
        Fourth, nothing in the Wisconsin program for delegation is contrary 
    to Federal guidance.
    
    D. Determinations
    
        In approving this delegation, EPA expects that the State will 
    obtain concurrence from EPA on any matter involving the interpretation 
    of Section 112 of the Clean Air Act or 40 CFR Part 63 to the extent 
    that implementation, administration, or enforcement of these sections 
    have not been covered by EPA determinations or guidance.
    
    III. Final Action
    
        The EPA is promulgating final approval of the December 22, 1995, 
    request by the State of Wisconsin for delegation of Section 112 
    standards because the request meets all requirements of 40 CFR 63.91 
    and Section 112(l) of the CAA. Upon the effective date of this 
    document, all existing section 112 standards which have been adopted 
    unchanged in to the State rules are automatically delegated to the 
    State of Wisconsin. Future delegation of the Section 112 standards to 
    the State will occur according to the procedures outlined in the MOA 
    upon EPA's promulgation of the standard.
        Effective immediately, all notifications, reports and other 
    correspondence required under Section 112 standards should be sent to 
    the State of Wisconsin rather than to the EPA, Region 5, in Chicago. 
    Affected sources should send this information to: Bureau of Air 
    Management, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, 101 South 
    Webster Street, P.O. Box 7921, Madison, Wisconsin 53707.
        EPA is publishing this action without prior proposal because EPA 
    views this action as a noncontroversial revision and anticipates no 
    adverse comments. However, the rulemaking will not be deemed final if 
    timely unaddressed adverse or critical comments are filed. The ``direct 
    final'' approval shall be effective on June 2, 1997, unless EPA 
    receives such adverse or critical comments by May 1, 1997. EPA is now 
    soliciting public comments on this action. Any parties interested in 
    commenting on this action should do so at this time. In the proposed 
    rules section of this Federal Register, EPA is publishing a separate 
    document which constitutes a ``proposed approval'' of the requested 
    delegation. If EPA receives
    
    [[Page 15404]]
    
    timely comments adverse to or critical of the approval discussed above, 
    which have not been addressed by the State or EPA, EPA will publish a 
    Federal Register document which withdraws this final action. All public 
    comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent rulemaking 
    document based on the proposed approval. EPA will not institute a 
    second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in 
    commenting on this action should do so at this time.
        Copies of the State's submittal and other information relied upon 
    for the final approval are contained in a rulemaking file maintained at 
    the EPA Regional Office. The file is an organized and complete record 
    of all the information submitted to, or otherwise considered by, EPA in 
    the development of this final approval. The file is available for 
    public inspection at the location listed under the ADDRESSES section of 
    this document.
        Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting, allowing 
    or establishing a precedent for any future request for revision to the 
    State's delegated air toxics program. EPA shall consider each request 
    for revision to the State's delegated air toxics program in light of 
    specific technical, economic, and environmental factors and in relation 
    to relevant statutory and regulatory requirements.
        This action has been classified as a Table 3 action by the Regional 
    Administrator under the procedures published in the Federal Register on 
    January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2214-2225), as revised by an October 4, 1993 
    memorandum from Michael H. Shapiro, Acting Assistant Administrator for 
    Air and Radiation. The Office of Management and Budget exempted this 
    regulatory action from Executive Order 12866 review.
        Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., EPA 
    must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of 
    any proposed or final rule on small entities. (5 U.S.C. 603 and 604.) 
    Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a 
    significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small 
    entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, 
    and government entities with jurisdiction over populations of less than 
    50,000.
        Delegation of the Section 112 standards unchanged from the Federal 
    standard does not create any new requirements, but simply allows the 
    State to administer requirements that have been or will be separately 
    promulgated. Therefore, because this delegation approval does not 
    impose any new requirements, I certify that it does not have a 
    significant impact on any small entities affected.
        Under Sections 202, 203 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 
    of 1995 (``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, 
    EPA must undertake various actions in association with proposed or 
    final rules that include a Federal mandate that may result in estimated 
    costs of $100 million or more to the private sector, or to State, 
    local, or tribal governments in the aggregate.
        EPA has determined that the approval action promulgated today does 
    not constitute a Federal mandate that may result in estimated costs of 
    $100 million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments in 
    the aggregate, or to the private sector. The State voluntarily 
    requested this delegation under Section 112(l) for the purpose of 
    implementing and enforcing the air toxics program with respect to 
    sources not covered by Part 70. The delegation imposes no new Federal 
    requirements. Since the State was not required by law to seek 
    delegation, this Federal action does not impose a mandate on the State.
        Under Section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
    judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
    of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by June 2, 1997. Filing a 
    petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
    does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial 
    review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial 
    review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such 
    rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings 
    to enforce its requirements. (See Section 307(b)(2).)
        Under 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) as added by the Small Business 
    Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, EPA submitted a report 
    containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, 
    the U.S. House of Representatives and the Comptroller General of the 
    General Accounting Office prior to publication of this rule in today's 
    Federal Register. This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 
    U.S.C. 804(2).
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63
    
        Environmental Protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
    Air pollution control, Hazardous substances, Intergovernmental 
    relations.
    
        Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
    
        Dated: February 7, 1997.
    Michelle D. Jordan,
    Acting Regional Administrator.
    [FR Doc. 97-8183 Filed 3-31-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
6/2/1997
Published:
04/01/1997
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Direct final rule.
Document Number:
97-8183
Dates:
This action will become effective June 2, 1997, unless adverse
Pages:
15402-15404 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
WI73-01-7302(b), FRL-5691-7
PDF File:
97-8183.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 63