X95-10410. Earl N. Caldwell, M.D.; Revocation of Registration  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 68 (Monday, April 10, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Page 18143]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: X95-10410]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
    
    Drug Enforcement Administration
    [Docket No. 94-82]
    
    
    Earl N. Caldwell, M.D.; Revocation of Registration
    
        On August 31, 1994, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of 
    Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), issued an 
    Order to Show Cause to Earl N. Caldwell, M.D. of Highland Park, 
    Illinois (Respondent), proposing to revoke his DEA Certificate of 
    Registration, BC0950104, and deny any pending applications for 
    registration as a practitioner. The statutory basis for the Order to 
    Show Cause was that Respondent's continued registration would be 
    inconsistent with the public interest pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(f), and 
    that Respondent was no longer authorized to handle controlled 
    substances in the State of Illinois. 21 U.S.C. 824 (a)(3) and (a)(4).
        Respondent, through counsel, requested a hearing on the issues 
    raised in the Order to Show Cause and the matter was docketed before 
    Administrative Law Judge Mary Ellen Bittner. Following prehearing 
    procedures, the Government filed a motion for summary disposition on 
    October 11, 1994, alleging that Respondent no longer held state 
    authorization to handle controlled substances on the ground that the 
    Illinois Department of Professional Responsibility, Medical 
    Disciplinary Board, had placed Respondent's medical license on 
    probation for five years and suspended his authority to handle 
    controlled substances for the duration of that probationary term. 
    Respondent filed an opposition to the Government's motion for summary 
    disposition on October 31, 1994, arguing that the Illinois Board's 
    decision had been rendered in error and, therefore, was not final 
    pending administrative review.
        On November 2, 1994, the administrative law judge entered her 
    opinion and recommended a decision granting the Government's motion for 
    summary disposition and recommending that the Respondent's DEA 
    Certificate of Registration be revoked. No exceptions were filed by 
    either party.
        On December 2, 1994, the administrative law judge transmitted the 
    record to the Deputy Administrator. After a careful consideration of 
    the record in its entirety, the Deputy Administrator enters his final 
    order in this matter pursuant to 21 CFR 1316.67, based on findings of 
    fact and conclusions of law as set forth herein.
        Effective May 13, 1992, the Illinois Department of Professional 
    Responsibility, Medical Disciplinary Board, suspended Respondent's 
    license to practice medicine for five years and suspended his authority 
    to handle controlled substances for the duration of that period. 
    Respondent does not deny that his state license has been placed on 
    probation for five years. As a result, Respondent is no longer 
    authorized to dispense controlled substances in the State of Illinois.
        The DEA has consistently held that it does not have statutory 
    authority under the Controlled Substances Act to register a 
    practitioner unless that practitioner is authorized to dispense 
    controlled substances by the state in which he proposes to practice. 
    See Lawrence R. Alexander, M.D., 57 FR 22256 (1992); Bobby Watts, M.D., 
    53 FR 11919 (1988); Robert F. Witek, D.D.S., 52 FR 4770 (1987).
        In a case where a practitioner is no longer authorized to handle 
    controlled substances in the state in which he proposes to practice, a 
    motion for summary disposition is properly entertained. It is well 
    settled that where no question of fact exists, or where the material 
    facts are agreed, a plenary administrative proceeding is not required.  
    Phillip E. Kirk, M.D., 48 FR 32887 (1983), aff'd sub nom Kirk v. 
    Mullen, 749 F.2d 297 (6th Cir. 1984).
        The Deputy Administrator adopts the Opinion and Recommended 
    Decision of the Administrative Law Judge in its entirety. Accordingly, 
    the Deputy Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration, 
    pursuant to the authority vested in him by 21 U.S.C. 823 and 824 and 28 
    CFR 0.100(b) and 0.104, hereby orders that DEA Certificate of 
    Registration, BC0950104, previously issued to Earl N. Caldwell, M.D., 
    be, and it hereby is, revoked, and any pending applications for such 
    registration be, and hereby are, denied. This order is effective May 
    10, 1995.
    
        Dated: April 3, 1995.
    Stephen H. Greene,
    Deputy Administrator.
    FR. Doc. 95-8650 Filed 4-7-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/10/1995
Department:
Drug Enforcement Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
X95-10410
Pages:
18143-18143 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 94-82
PDF File:
x95-10410.pdf