97-9182. Arbitration Panel Decision Under the Randolph-Sheppard Act  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 69 (Thursday, April 10, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 17602-17603]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-9182]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
    
    
    Arbitration Panel Decision Under the Randolph-Sheppard Act
    
    AGENCY: Department of Education.
    
    ACTION: Notice of Arbitration Panel Decision Under the Randolph-
    Sheppard Act.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that on August 30, 1996, an arbitration 
    panel rendered a decision in the matter of The State of Nevada, Bureau 
    of Services to the Blind v. U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of 
    Reclamation (Docket No. R-S/95-3). This panel was convened by the U.S. 
    Department of Education pursuant to 20 U.S.C. 107d-1(b), upon receipt 
    of a complaint filed by the State of Nevada, Bureau of Services to the 
    Blind.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A copy of the full text of the 
    arbitration panel decision may be obtained from George F. Arsnow, U.S. 
    Department of Education, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Room 3230, Mary 
    E. Switzer Building, Washington, D.C. 20202-2738. Telephone: (202) 205-
    9317. Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the deaf 
    (TDD) may call the TDD number at (202) 205-8298.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the Randolph-Sheppard Act (20 
    U.S.C. 107d-2(c)), the Secretary publishes in the Federal Register a 
    synopsis of arbitration panel decisions affecting the administration of 
    vending facilities on Federal and other property.
    
    Background
    
        The State of Nevada, Bureau of Services to the Blind, the State 
    licensing agency (SLA), alleged that the Department of Interior, Bureau 
    of Reclamation (Reclamation) violated the Randolph-Sheppard Act (the 
    Act), pursuant to 20 U.S.C. 107 et seq. and implementing regulations in 
    34 CFR Part 395.
        The SLA established three vending facilities under permit at the 
    Hoover Dam near Boulder City, Nevada. Two of the vending facilities 
    (the Hoover Dam Snacketeria and the Nevada Lookout Point, which is also 
    known as the Hoover Dam Store) were established in 1981. The third 
    location, known as the Arizona Lookout Point, was established in 1982.
        The SLA's allegations are as follows: Reclamation notified the SLA 
    of its intention to terminate the permits of the three facilities. 
    Reclamation then sent the SLA, for its approval, a Special Use 
    Agreement limited to 10 years and requiring the blind vendors to pay a 
    fee of 10 percent of the gross sales in addition to rent.
        Subsequently, the SLA was informed by Reclamation that it would 
    solicit open bids for concessions at the Hoover Dam if the SLA did not 
    sign the Special Use Agreement. In addition, the SLA discovered in 
    January 1995 that Reclamation had operated vending machines at the 
    Hoover Dam independently of the blind vendors since January 1, 1975. 
    Reclamation had never paid the SLA vending machine income as required 
    under the Act.
        Conversely, Reclamation alleged as follows: The Randolph-Sheppard 
    Act does not require vending facilities in the parking ramp or the 
    Visitors Center and, therefore, the SLA may operate vending facilities 
    at this site only upon terms that are mutually agreeable. Further, the 
    Act does not require Reclamation to pay for alleged relocation and 
    other costs attendant to any move that might occur. In addition, 
    Reclamation is not responsible for more than 30 percent of any vending 
    revenues at the Hoover Dam because the Visitors Center and parking ramp 
    would house fewer than
    
    [[Page 17603]]
    
    100 Federal employees during normal working hours.
        On March 6, 1996, the SLA filed a request with the Secretary of 
    Education to convene an arbitration panel pursuant to the Act and 
    regulations.
        On January 23 and 24, 1996, an arbitration hearing was held 
    concerning the SLA's charges of alleged violations of the Act and 
    regulations by Reclamation. The issues heard by the panel were--(1) 
    Whether Reclamation was responsible for certain relocation costs of two 
    vending facilities at the Hoover Dam; (2) whether Reclamation was 
    required to provide a suitable site to blind vendors in the newly 
    constructed parking garage or Visitors Center at the Hoover Dam and to 
    pay for relocation costs, architectural fees, and other associated 
    costs; (3) whether Reclamation is required to comply with the vending 
    machine income-sharing provisions of the Act and implementing 
    regulations; and (4) whether the SLA lost its right to claim income 
    from vending machines based upon waiver, estoppel, or laches?
    
    Arbitration Panel Decision
    
        The majority of the Arbitration Panel found that, while Reclamation 
    was not responsible for relocation costs, it was nevertheless 
    responsible for providing suitable sites to the blind licensees 
    operating the Hoover Dam Store and the Hoover Dam Snacketeria in the 
    newly constructed facility under the existing indefinite permits, 
    without additional payments of rent and commissions on sales to 
    Reclamation. The panel stated that Reclamation may not require, as a 
    condition of continuing or establishing a vending facility in the 
    parking ramp or at the Arizona Lookout, the payment of commissions on 
    sales, rent, or other charges not included in the indefinite permit, 
    nor can Reclamation require the SLA or the vendors to sign any time-
    limited contract, special use agreement, or other document of this 
    kind.
        The panel concluded that to require the SLA to pay rent and 
    commissions on sales would be a violation of 34 CFR 395.31(d) and would 
    be inconsistent with the ruling in State of Minnesota, Department of 
    Jobs and Training v. Riley, 18 Fd.3rd 606 (8th Cir. 1994).
        The panel further found that Reclamation will move, at its expense, 
    the stock and equipment owned by the blind licensees operating the 
    Hoover Dam Snacketeria and the Hoover Dam Store from the temporary 
    facilities to the new location in the parking ramp and provide space 
    consistent with discussions held with the SLA. The SLA will bear the 
    responsibility of the cost to complete the internal space.
        In addition, the panel ruled that pursuant to 34 CFR 395.32 (a) and 
    (d) Reclamation is liable to the SLA for 30 percent of all vending 
    machine income derived since January 2, 1975, from the machines located 
    inside the Hoover Dam. Therefore, Reclamation will identify and account 
    for the revenues earned since that date that are owed.
        One panel member dissented from the majority opinion.
        The views and opinions expressed by the panel do not necessarily 
    represent the views and opinions of the U.S. Department of Education.
    
        Dated: April 4, 1997.
    Judith E. Heumann,
    Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
    [FR Doc. 97-9182 Filed 4-9-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/10/1997
Department:
Education Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of Arbitration Panel Decision Under the Randolph- Sheppard Act.
Document Number:
97-9182
Pages:
17602-17603 (2 pages)
PDF File:
97-9182.pdf