97-9198. Certain Agricultural Tractors Under 50 Power Take-Off Horsepower; Notice of Denial of Petition for Reconsideration and Motion for Relief Pending Review  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 69 (Thursday, April 10, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Page 17636]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-9198]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
    
    [Investigation No. 337-TA-380]
    
    
    Certain Agricultural Tractors Under 50 Power Take-Off Horsepower; 
    Notice of Denial of Petition for Reconsideration and Motion for Relief 
    Pending Review
    
    AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
    
    ACTION: Notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
    Commission has determined to deny respondents' Petition for 
    Reconsideration and respondents' Motion for Relief Pending Review in 
    the above-captioned investigation.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shara L. Aranoff, Esq., Office of the 
    General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
    S.W., Washington, D.C. 20436, telephone 202-205-3090.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The authority for the Commission's 
    determination is contained in Section 705 of the Administrative 
    Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 705), Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
    amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Secs. 210.47 and 210.48 of the 
    Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 C.F.R. 210.47 and 
    210.48).
        This trademark-based section 337 investigation was instituted by 
    the Commission on February 14, 1996, based on a complaint filed by 
    Kubota Tractor Corporation (``KTC''), Kubota Manufacturing of America 
    (``KMA''), and Kubota Corporation (``KBT'') (collectively 
    ``complainants''). On January 9, 1997, the Commission determined not to 
    review that portion of the presiding administrative law judge's (ALJ) 
    final initial determination (ID) finding a violation of section 337 
    based on infringement of complainants' federally-registered U.S. 
    trademark ``KUBOTA'' (Reg. No. 922,330).
        On February 25, 1997, the Commission issued a general exclusion 
    order prohibiting the unlicensed entry for consumption of agricultural 
    tractors under 50 power take-off horsepower manufactured by Kubota 
    Corporation of Japan that infringe the federally-registered U.S. 
    trademark ``KUBOTA'' and eleven cease and desist orders directed to 
    respondents Bay Implement Company, Casteel World Group, Inc. (and 
    related entities), Gamut Trading Co. (and related entities), Lost Creek 
    Tractor Sales, MGA, Inc. Auctioneers, The Tractor Shop, Tractor 
    Company, and Wallace International Trading Co. prohibiting the 
    importation, sale for importation, or sale in the United States after 
    importation of agricultural tractors under 50 power take-off horsepower 
    manufactured by Kubota Corporation of Japan that infringe the 
    federally-registered U.S. trademark ``KUBOTA''. The Commission also 
    determined that the public interest factors enumerated in subsections 
    337(d) and (f) did not preclude the issuance of the general exclusion 
    order and cease and desist orders, and that the bond during the 
    Presidential review period should be in the amount of 90 percent of the 
    entered value of the articles in question.
        On March 13, 1997, respondents Gamut Trading Co., Gamut Imports, 
    Wallace International Trading Co., Wallace Import Marketing Co., Inc., 
    Bay Implement Co., Casteel World Group, Inc., The Tractor Shop, Suma 
    Sangyo, Eisho World Ltd., Sanko Industries Co., Ltd, and Fujisawa 
    Trading Co. filed a Petition for Reconsideration pursuant to Commission 
    rules 210.47 and 210.48, requesting that the Commission reconsider its 
    conclusion that requiring warning labels on the infringing tractors 
    would not be an effective remedy. On the same date, respondents also 
    filed a Motion for Relief Pending Review, requesting that the 
    Commission stay the effective date of its general exclusion order and 
    cease and desist orders until such time as the U.S. Court of Appeals 
    for the Federal Circuit can decide respondents' planned appeal. 
    Responses in opposition to both requests were received from 
    complainants and the Commission investigative attorney (IA) on March 
    24, 1997.
        Having considered the written submissions of the parties, as well 
    as the record in this investigation, the Commission determined to deny 
    both respondents' Petition for Reconsideration and respondents' Motion 
    for Relief Pending Review.
        Copies of the Commission's opinion and order and all other 
    nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation 
    are or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
    (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
    International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 
    20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired persons are advised 
    that information on the matter can be obtained by contacting the 
    Commission's TDD terminal at 202-205-1810.
    
        Issued: April 4, 1997.
        By order of the Commission.
    
    Donna R. Koehnke,
    Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 97-9198 Filed 4-9-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/10/1997
Department:
International Trade Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
97-9198
Pages:
17636-17636 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Investigation No. 337-TA-380
PDF File:
97-9198.pdf