[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 69 (Friday, April 10, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17882-17886]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-9560]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Revised Procedures for Selecting and Funding Federal Aid in Sport
Fish and Wildlife Restoration Administrative Projects
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
[[Page 17883]]
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Service is announcing procedures for obtaining funding for
Federal Aid administrative projects and availability of an estimated
$2,000,000 for Wildlife Restoration projects and $2,000,000 for Sport
Fish projects. This year's program incorporates changes to the
documentation, focus areas and submission requirements.
DATES: Applications/proposals must be received by June 1, 1998.
ADDRESSES: Proposals must be submitted to: U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Chief, Division of Federal Aid, MS 140 ARLSQ, 4401 North
Fairfax Drive, Arlington, Virginia 22203.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Robert E. Lange, Jr., Chief, Division of Federal Aid, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service; (703) 358-2156.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Service publishes a notice in the
Federal Register each year announcing the deadline for project
proposals, the amount of money available for Sport Fish and Wildlife
Restoration projects, and the focus areas identified for the year.
Focus areas are used to promote and encourage efforts that address
priority needs of the State fish and wildlife agencies.
The focus areas contained in this notice were developed in
cooperation with the Grants-in-Aid Committee of the International
Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies and represent that group's
assessment of priority projects. The focus areas are provided as a
guide so that applicants will know the types of projects that will
likely score higher in the rankings.
Changes made since last year's program include revised focus areas,
the requirement that the entire amount of funds requested for multi-
year projects must be obligated in the fiscal year the grant is
approved and that all proposals must be accompanied by a floppy disk
containing the project narrative.
States, local governments, charitable and educational institutions,
and other authorized recipients are authorized to apply for grants
according to these procedures.The Department of the Interior has
promulgated rules (43 CFR part 12) adopting common rules developed by
the Office of Management and Budget as required by OMB Circulars A-102
and A-110 that contain administrative requirements that apply to these
grants. This annual grant program does not contain information
collection requirements for which approval by the Office of Management
and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, as specified in
43 CFR part 12.4, are required. Any additional information collection
requirements for this grant program are those necessary to comply with
43 CFR part 12, which include (a) project narrative: and (b) compliance
with Federal laws, regulations, and policies. Record keeping includes
the tracking of costs and accomplishments, monitoring progress and
evaluating accomplishments, and reporting requirements. The Application
for Federal Assistance (the Standard Form 424 series) prescribed by OMB
Circulars A-102 and A-110 and required as part of this application
process have the OMB clearance number 0348-0043.
Dated: April 6, 1998.
Jamie Rappaport Clark,
Director.
Procedures for Selecting and Funding Federal Aid in Sport Fish and
Wildlife Restoration Administrative Projects
A. Purpose
This statement establishes procedures for selecting administrative
projects to be funded by the Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration and
Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration programs. These projects are funded
by grants to States, local governments, charitable and educational
institutions, or other authorized recipients to accomplish public
purposes relating to administering the Sport Fish and Wildlife
Restoration Programs and to facilitate the efforts of the States in
implementing these programs.
B. Background
The mission of the two grant programs is to strengthen the ability
of State and Territorial fish and wildlife agencies to meet effectively
the consumptive and nonconsumptive needs of the public for fish and
wildlife resources. The Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration Act and
the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act authorize the Secretary of
the Interior to cooperate with the States and to use administrative
funds for carrying out the purposes of the Acts. The Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661) provides the authority to provide
financial assistance to Federal, State, and public or private parties
to facilitate fish and wildlife programs. Administrative funds are
deducted each year from the total amounts of funds available under the
Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration Act and the Federal Aid in
Wildlife Restoration Act. The statutory provisions related to
administrative deductions are as follows:
Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration (SFR)--Federal Aid
Administrative Funds for sport fish restoration may not exceed 6
percent of the deposits in the SFR Account of the Aquatic Resources
Trust Fund. These funds may be used for administrative projects for the
``conduct of necessary investigations, administration, and the
execution of this Act and for the aiding in the formulation, adoption,
or administration of any compact between two or more States for the
conservation and management of migratory fishes in marine or fresh
waters.'' (Section 4 of the Act as amended by Pub. L. 98-369, 16 U.S.C.
777c)
Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration (WR)--Federal Aid
Administrative Funds for wildlife restoration may not exceed 8 percent
of the excise tax receipts deposited in the WR Fund. These funds may be
used for the ``administration and execution of this Act and the
Migratory Bird Conservation Act.'' (Section 4 of the Act, 16 U.S.C.
669c)
After making administrative deductions as specified above, the
remainder of the funds will be apportioned to the States in accordance
with the formulas contained in the Acts. The Service will strive to
minimize administrative deductions in order to maximize apportionments
to the States.
C. Availability of Funds
In fiscal year 1999, the amounts of funds estimated to be available
for administrative projects are $2,000,000 for sport fish restoration
and $2,000,000 for wildlife restoration.
D. Interstate Compacts
The Service also will make available a total of $600,000 annually,
without competition, for funding The Atlantic States Marine Fisheries
Commission, Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission, and Pacific States
Marine Fisheries Commission, as authorized by law. Requests for
additional amounts that may be eligible, must compete with other
proposals for Administrative Funds. Proposals will be subject to all of
the requirements in Section E.
E. Eligibility Requirements
The Service's Division of Federal Aid will review each proposal to
determine if proposals are eligible for funding. To be eligible for
funding, proposals must meet the following:
1. Authority--The project being proposed must be consistent with
the missions of the program authorized by the SFR/WR laws and
regulations.
2. Scope--The problem or need addressed in the proposal is of
direct
[[Page 17884]]
concern to one-half or more of the States or of national significance,
but confined to a lesser geographic area. The scope of marine resources
proposals must also address a need that is of direct concern to a
majority of States on a specific coast.
3. Significance--The problem or need addressed is deserving of the
level of attention proposed.
4. Feasibility--The proposed objectives can be attained in the
amount of time and with the personnel and resources requested.
5. Cost-effectiveness--The expected results of accomplishing the
proposal are worth the costs to be expended.
6. Period--The maximum duration for any approved projects will be
three years. New proposals may be submitted to extend a project beyond
the original three-year period.
7. Documentation--Proposals must address each section of the
documentation as listed under Submission Requirements, Section G.
F. Application Process
1. All proposals for Federal Aid administrative funding must be
submitted to the Chief, Division of Federal Aid, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, ARLSQ. 140, Arlington, Virginia
22203. See guidance below for electronic submission of proposals.
Proposals originating within the Service must have prior approval by
the appropriate Regional Director or Assistant Director.
2. Each year, a Notice will be published in the Federal Register
announcing the deadline for submitting proposals. The Notice will also
announce total funds available for wildlife and sport fish restoration
projects. A table with the approximate dates for each step of the
process is provided in Appendix A.
G. Submission Requirements
An original and two copies of each proposal for Federal Aid
Administrative funds must be submitted in the following format. A
floppy disk must accompany each application that contains the narrative
portion of the proposal (excluding required forms).
Electronic submission of the narrative portion of proposals via the
Internet is encouraged and should be addressed to tom-taylor@fws.gov.
Applicants who submit proposals using email will be required to submit
hard copies of the Application for Federal Assistance (Standard Form
424 series), if their projects are judged eligible for funding.
Any commonly used word processing software may be used to compose
projects submitted via disk or email.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to limit the narrative portion
of proposals to 10 pages or less.
1. Application for Federal Assistance--Standard Form 424 is
prescribed by Office of Management and Budget Circular A-110 and the
common rule (Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and
Cooperative Agreements to States and Local Governments). The SF 424
consists of a coversheet, the SF 424A consists of a budget sheet, and
the SF 424B consists of compliance assurances. Proposals received
without these forms will not be accepted.
2. Title--A short descriptive name of the proposal.
3. Objective--What will this proposal do? State a concise statement
of the purpose of the proposal in quantified terms where possible.
4. Need--Why address this problem?
a. State the problem or need that this proposal is intended to
address. Make references to any focus areas that the proposal
addresses.
b. Describe the number of states affected by the project, how they
will benefit, and expressed support for the proposal. If the proposal
is confined to a specific geographic area, describe the national
significance of the proposal.
c. Brief status report on the history of previous work conducted by
the proposer or others to address this need.
5. Expected Results or Benefits--What will be gained by funding
this proposal? Describe the significance of accomplishing the project
relative to the stated need. Relate benefits of satisfactorily
completing the project to the States' fish and wildlife programs. In
addition to stating how the results will be useful, describe provisions
for making the product or results available and usable to those
affected by the problem or need. Benefits should be expressed in
quantified terms, i.e., angler days, harvest per unit effort,
improvements to State administration, dollars saved, etc.
6. Approach--How will the proposed project be conducted? Describe
how the work will be conducted including a description of techniques
and method to be used, milestones, and a schedule of accomplishments.
7. Resumes--What are the qualifications of key personnel? Include
resumes and names of key individuals who will be involved in the
project, stating their particular qualifications for undertaking the
project.
8. Project Costs--Submit a completed SF-424A, Budget Information--
Non-Construction Programs. Multi-year proposals must include an
itemized budget showing funds required for each 12 month period.
H. Focus Areas
Focus areas are those specific areas in which the States are
seeking information and assistance in administering or implementing the
Sport Fish and Wildlife Restoration programs. Focus areas will be
announced each year by the Service, based on recommendations from the
Grants-In-Aid Committee (GIAC) in accordance with the bylaws of the
International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies (IAFWA). Each
year, the GIAC will be asked to submit recommendations for focus areas
after its September meeting. Each year a Federal Register Notice will
announce the Focus Areas, along with the amount of funds available for
administrative projects.
The following focus areas were identified as priority needs of the
States and those proposals addressing these needs will likely be given
priority by the States during the ranking in 1998.
1. Outreach--Providing public information on fishing, boat access,
hunting, trapping, and wildlife related recreation.
a. Provide innovative approaches to introducing people to hunting
and fishing, including emphasis on families.
b. Advance public awareness of the value and successes of the Sport
Fish and Wildlife Restoration Funds.
c. Focus public attention on and enhance public awareness of the
economic value of managing fish and wildlife resources for both
consumptive and non-consumptive recreation.
d. Provide better understanding of how to reach constituents with
fish and wildlife related information.
2. Education--Teaching or training people about fish and wildlife
resources and the responsible use of the resources.
a. Advance the public's understanding of importance of actively
managing fish and wildlife resources.
b. Advance public understanding of the importance of biological
diversity in maintaining diverse hunting and fishing opportunities.
c. Promote natural resources and environmental education of ``K
through 12'' students.
d. Provide for continuing education and training for state fish and
wildlife biologists.
3. Management--Handling, directing, manipulating, and managing fish
and wildlife populations and providing improved public access to these
populations. These focus areas relate to hands-on responsibilities of
fish and wildlife management agencies.
[[Page 17885]]
a. Restore, create, enhance, and protect fish and wildlife.
b. Provide, enhance, or maintain public access to fish and wildlife
resources.
c. Protect, create, and enhance fish and wildlife recreational
opportunities.
4. Administration--Providing service, supervisory, and management
responsibilities that directly link to supporting fish and wildlife
agency affairs.
a. Provide better understanding of constituents and their needs.
b. Measure changing social, economic, and political environment
within which fish and wildlife must be managed.
c. Advance automated licensing and fiscal data collections for fish
and wildlife agencies.
5. Research--Conducting investigations, inquiries, searches,
examinations, and experiments for the discovery and interpretation of
facts.
a. Evaluate effectiveness of incorporating constituent involvement
and information in fish and wildlife resource management.
b. Measure effectiveness of habitat restoration, creation, and
enhancement techniques.
I. Proposal Review and Selection Process
1. Each proposal will be reviewed for eligibility as defined in
section E. The review and final determination for eligibility will be
conducted by the Washington Office staff.
2. All applicants will be notified that their proposal has been
determined eligible or ineligible.
3. Copies of eligible proposals will be forwarded to the Chair,
GIAC, along with lists of ongoing grants and ineligible proposals. The
Chair, GIAC, will forward copies to the voting members of the GIAC.
4. Voting members of the GIAC will review and rate each eligible
proposal high, medium, low, or do not fund.
5. All ratings from GIAC voting members and comments from Service
Offices will be returned to the Division of Federal Aid in Washington.
6. The Division of Federal Aid will summarize the ratings and
comments.
7. A summary of the comments and ratings will be provided to the
Chair, GIAC, for review at the GIAC September meeting.
8. During the September meeting of the IAFWA, the GIAC will
evaluate and rank eligible proposals based on the needs of the States.
The GIAC will forward its rankings and recommendations to the Service
in accordance with IAFWA procedures.
9. The Division of Federal Aid will summarize and consolidate all
rankings and comments and develop recommendations for proposal
selections and awards. The recommendations may be for partial funding
of any proposal.
10. The Federal Aid Division's recommendations will be forwarded to
the Director of the Service. The Director will review the
recommendations and make the final decision on project selections and
funding.
11. The Service will notify each eligible applicant in writing of
the final disposition of their proposal.
12. The Director will notify the Regional Directors and the Chair,
GIAC, of the proposals selected for funding.
K. Lobbying Restrictions
During the review of proposals, grant applicants may not engage in
any activities that might be considered as attempts to influence
Federal reviewers or approving officials. If the activities are
determined to be lobbying, the proposal will be disqualified for
Federal Aid Administrative Funds.
J. Awards and Funding
1. The Service's Division of Contracting and General Services will
prepare and sign the formal award agreements. The Federal Aid Office,
may provide technical assistance to the Division of Contracting and
General Services in finalizing the award agreements. The formal award
agreements will be forwarded to the awardees for signature and must be
signed by the Service and authorized awardee officials before they
become valid agreements. This process may require up to 60 days to
complete. The Service is not responsible for costs incurred prior to
the effective date of a signed agreement; therefore, the starting date
for all projects should be planned accordingly.
2. The entire amount of funds required for a project must be
obligated in the fiscal year the grant is approved.
3. Non-profit grantees must maintain a financial management system
in accordance with the Office of Management and Budget Circular A-110.
State and local governments must maintain a financial management system
in accordance with OMB Circular A-102 and 43 CFR part 12.
K. Project Administration
Proposals awarded funding will be assigned to a Project Officer.
Project Officers are those persons representing the Contracting Officer
on technical matters relating to the responsibilities of the grantee.
They provide assistance that includes:
1. Assisting Service contracting officials in completing the award
agreement;
2. Serving as the Service's point of contact after the award
agreement is signed;
3. Receiving and approving bills; and
4. Monitoring project performance and assuring that the award
recipient adheres to the award agreement.
Summary of Events--Appendix A
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target date Event
------------------------------------------------------------------------
April 14.................................. Federal Register Notice
announcing availability of
Federal Aid Funds and focus
areas for grant
applications.
June 1.................................... Washington Office receives
proposals.
June 30................................... Washington Office with
assistance from the Regions
determines eligibility
(Chair of the Grants-In-Aid
Committee (GIAC)
participates as an
observer).
July 15................................... Service forwards copies of
eligible proposals to
voting members of the GIAC
(includes summary list of
ongoing grants and list of
ineligible proposal).
July 15................................... Service sends letters to all
applicants informing them
that their proposal is
eligible or ineligible.
August 28................................. Voting members of the GIAC
forward comments and
ratings to Chief, FA
(Ratings of High, Medium,
Low, or Do Not Fund).
September 4............................... Chief, FA, summarizes
comments and ratings and
forwards to Chair, GIAC,
for review at the September
meeting.
September 13.............................. GIAC reviews and ranks
proposals and forwards
rankings and
recommendations to Service,
along with recommendations
for Focus Areas for the
following year.
October 31................................ Federal Air summarizes all
rankings and
recommendations for
consideration by the
Director.
November 15............................... Director selects proposals
for funding.
November 30............................... Federal Aid notifies
applicants and Chair, GIAC,
of the final disposition of
proposals.
[[Page 17886]]
March 1................................... Contracting and General
Services awards grants.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 98-9560 Filed 4-9-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
