94-8576. Hazardous Waste Management System; Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste; Proposed Amendment  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 69 (Monday, April 11, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-8576]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: April 11, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    40 CFR Part 261
    
    [SW-FRL-4861-9]
    
     
    
    Hazardous Waste Management System; Identification and Listing of 
    Hazardous Waste; Proposed Amendment
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
    
    ACTION: Proposed amendment and request for comment.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency) is 
    proposing to modify an exclusion from the lists of hazardous wastes 
    previously granted for certain solid wastes generated by POP Fasteners 
    (POP) in Shelton, Connecticut. This action is taken in response to a 
    petition for amendment submitted by POP to increase the maximum annual 
    waste volume covered in its exclusion. The exclusion was granted under 
    regulations that allow generators to petition EPA to remove their waste 
    from hazardous waste control by excluding them from the hazardous waste 
    lists.
    
    DATES: EPA is requesting public comments on this proposed amendment. 
    Comments will be accepted until May 11, 1994. Comments postmarked after 
    the close of the comment period will be stamped ``late''.
        Any person may request a hearing on this proposed amendment by 
    filing a request with the Director, Characterization and Assessment 
    Division, Office of Solid Waste, whose address appears below, by April 
    26, 1994. The request must contain the information prescribed in 40 CFR 
    260.20(d).
    
    ADDRESSES: Send three copies of your comments to EPA. Two copies should 
    be sent to the Docket Clerk, Office of Solid Waste (5305), U.S. 
    Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, SW., Washington, DC 
    20460. A third copy should be sent to Jim Kent, Delisting Section, 
    Waste Identification Branch, CAD/OSW (5304), U.S. Environmental 
    Protection Agency, 401 M Street, SW., Washington, DC 20460. Identify 
    your comments at the top with this regulatory docket number: ``F-94-
    DHWA-FFFFF''.
        Requests for a hearing should be addressed to the Director, 
    Characterization and Assessment Division, Office of Solid Waste (5304), 
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, SW., Washington, DC 
    20460.
        The RCRA regulatory docket for this proposed amendment is located 
    at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, SW., 
    Washington, DC 20460, and is available for viewing (Room M2616) from 9 
    a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays. Call 
    (202) 260-9327 for appointments. The public may copy material from any 
    regulatory docket at no cost for the first 100 pages, and at $0.15 per 
    page for additional copies.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information, contact the 
    RCRA Hotline, toll free at (800) 424-9346, or at (703) 412-9810. For 
    technical information concerning this notice, contact Shen-yi Yang, 
    Office of Solid Waste (5304), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 
    M Street, SW., Washington, DC 20460, (202) 260-1436.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Background
    
        On March 5, 1990, POP Fasteners (POP), a division of Black and 
    Decker Corporation, of Shelton, Connecticut petitioned the Agency under 
    Secs. 260.20 and 260.22, to exclude from hazardous waste control its 
    F006 metal hydroxide filter cake resulting from the treatment of 
    wastewater originating from its electroplating operation. In support of 
    its petition, POP submitted sufficient information to EPA to allow the 
    Agency to determine that: (1) The waste is not hazardous based upon the 
    criteria for which it was listed, and (2) no other hazardous 
    constituents or factors that could cause the waste to be hazardous are 
    present in the waste at levels of regulatory concern. After evaluating 
    the petition, the EPA published its final decision in the Federal 
    Register (57 FR 57673, December 7, 1992) to exclude POP's waste from 
    the lists of hazardous waste contained at Secs. 261.31 and 261.32.
        POP's final exclusion only applies to the process and waste volume 
    (a maximum of 300 cubic yards generated annually) covered by its 
    original petition. Any waste generated in excess of 300 cubic yards per 
    year must be handled as hazardous unless an amendment to its final 
    exclusion is granted.
    
    II. Disposition of Petition for Amendment
    
    POP Fasteners, Shelton, Connecticut
    
    A. Petition for An Amendment
        As a result of its business growth, POP petitioned the Agency on 
    May 10, 1993 for an amendment to its 1992 final exclusion for an 
    increase of its annual maximum waste generation from 300 cubic yards to 
    1,000 cubic yards.
        POP stated in its April 19, 1993 letter that: (1) The increase in 
    the filter cake generation was attributable to an increase in rivet 
    production since the petition was filed; (2) there have been no changes 
    in the manufacturing process, feed materials, or waste water treatment 
    process; and (3) the hours of POP's operation have increased.
        To confirm that the waste characteristics have not changed, POP 
    submitted results from the analyses of one filter cake composite for 
    all Toxicity Characteristic (TC) constituents listed in 40 CFR 261.24 
    and nickel using the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP, 
    SW-846 Method 1311). POP also submitted a signed certification dated 
    May 10, 1993 stating that all submitted information is true, accurate, 
    and complete.
    B. Agency Evaluation
        The Agency reviewed its previous decision to grant POP's original 
    delisting petition (57 FR 37921, 57 FR 57673 and the administrative 
    record in docket) and the analytical results provided by POP in support 
    of this petition. The analytical results submitted to support this 
    amendment show that the constituents detected in the waste sample, as 
    well as their respective leachate concentration levels, are consistent 
    with the waste data in POP's original petition. Furthermore, POP has 
    certified that there have been no changes in process or feed materials. 
    Therefore, the Agency believes that the waste characteristics have not 
    changed.
        The Agency evaluated the potential impact of POP's petitioned waste 
    on human health and the environment, at the increased annual maximum 
    waste volume, following the same approach used in POP's original 
    petition evaluation. Specifically, the Agency evaluated the waste using 
    the requested annual maximum waste volume estimate of 1,000 cubic yards 
    and the maximum reported leachate concentration of POP's waste using 
    the same ground-water model described in the Agency's original decision 
    (see 57 FR 37921, August 21, 1992 and the RCRA docket ``F-92-PEEP-
    FFFFF'' to that rule). The Agency notes that the modeling results are 
    the same for 300 and 1,000 cubic yards, and the increased waste volume 
    has no significant impact. Thus, the constituents in POP's waste would 
    not leach and migrate at concentrations above the Agency's health-based 
    levels used in delisting decision-making.
        EPA also considered the impact of the increased waste volume on 
    potential risks posed by other exposure routes (i.e., air emission, 
    surface water). Since the total concentration levels of hazardous 
    constituents of concern in the petitioned waste and the active landfill 
    area remain unchanged, the Agency believes that no significant exposure 
    to contaminants via air emission and surface runoff from POP's 
    petitioned waste is likely. See 57 FR 37921 (August 21, 1992), 57 FR 
    57673 (December 7, 1992), and the RCRA docket for these notices for a 
    detailed description of the evaluation.
    C. Conclusion
        The Agency believes that POP's waste is non-hazardous at the 
    maximum generation rate of 1,000 cubic yards per year, and should be 
    excluded from hazardous waste control. The Agency, therefore, proposes 
    to amend POP's exclusion to reflect a waste volume increase. This 
    proposed amendment would only apply to the process covered by POP's 
    original petition, and would allow a maximum annual waste volume of 
    1,000 cubic yards. All other conditions listed in POP's exclusion would 
    remain unchanged. Waste generated in excess of 1,000 cubic yards per 
    year or from changed processes would remain hazardous unless a new 
    exclusion is granted.
    
    III. Effective Date
    
        This amendment, if finally published, will become effective 
    immediately upon such final publication. The Hazardous and Solid Waste 
    Amendments of 1984 amended section 3010 of RCRA to allow rules to 
    become effective in less than six months when the regulated community 
    does not need the six-month period to come into compliance. That is the 
    case here, because this amendment, if finalized, would reduce the 
    existing requirements for persons generating hazardous wastes. In light 
    of the unnecessary hardship and expense that would be imposed on this 
    petitioner by an effective date six months after publication and the 
    fact that a six-month deadline is not necessary to achieve the purpose 
    of section 3010, EPA believes that this amendment should be effective 
    immediately upon final publication. These reasons also provide a basis 
    for making this amendment effective immediately, upon final 
    publication, under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(d).
    
    IV. Regulatory Impact
    
        Under Executive Order 12866, EPA must conduct an ``assessment of 
    the potential costs and benefits'' for all ``significant'' regulatory 
    actions. This proposal to amend an exclusion is not significant, since 
    its effect would be to reduce the overall costs and economic impact of 
    EPA's hazardous waste management regulations. This reduction would be 
    achieved by excluding additional amount of waste generated at a 
    specific facility from EPA's lists of hazardous wastes, thereby 
    enabling this facility to treat its waste as non-hazardous. Therefore, 
    this rule would not be a significant regulation, and no cost/benefit 
    assessment is required. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has 
    also exempted this rule from the requirement for OMB review under 
    section 6 of Executive Order 12866.
    
    V. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, 
    whenever an agency is required to publish a general notice of 
    rulemaking for any proposed or final rule, it must prepare and make 
    available for public comment a regulatory flexibility analysis that 
    describes the impact of the rule on small entities (i.e., small 
    businesses, small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions). 
    No regulatory flexibility analysis is required, however, if the 
    Administrator or delegated representative certifies that the rule will 
    not have any impact on any small entities.
        This amendment, if promulgated, will not have any adverse economic 
    impact on any small entities since its effect would be to reduce the 
    overall costs of EPA's hazardous waste regulations and would be limited 
    to one facility. Accordingly, I hereby certify that this proposed 
    regulation, if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact 
    on a substantial number of small entities. This regulation, therefore, 
    does not require a regulatory flexibility analysis.
    
    VI. Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        Information collection and recordkeeping requirements associated 
    with this proposed amendment have been approved by the Office of 
    Management and Budget (OMB) under the provisions of the Paperwork 
    Reduction Act of 1980 (Pub.L. 96-511, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and have 
    been assigned OMB Control Number 2050-0053.
    
    VII. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 261
    
        Environmental protection, Hazardous Waste, Recycling, and Reporting 
    and recordkeeping requirements.
    
        Dated: March 14, 1994.
    Michael Shapiro,
    Director, Office of Solid Waste.
    
        For the reasons set out in the preamble, 40 CFR part 261 is 
    proposed to be amended as follows:
    
    PART 261--IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
    
        1. The authority citation for part 261 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6905, 6912(a), 6921, 6922, and 6938.
    
    Appendix IX--[Amended]
    
        2. In Table 1 of appendix IX of part 261, the entry for ``POP 
    Fasteners, Shelton, Connecticut'' is revised to read as follows:
    
                                   Table 1.--Wastes Excluded From Non-specific Sources                              
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Facility                            Address                            Waste description            
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                    
                                                      * * * * * * *                                                 
    POP Fasteners....................  Shelton, Connecticut.............  Wastewater treatment sludge (EPA Hazardous
                                                                           Waste No. F006) generated from           
                                                                           electroplating operations (at a maximum  
                                                                           annual rate of 1,000 cubic yards) after  
                                                                           [date of publication of final rule]. In  
                                                                           order to confirm that the characteristics
                                                                           of the waste do not change significantly,
                                                                           the facility must, on an annual basis,   
                                                                           analyze a representative composite sample
                                                                           for the constituents listed in Sec.      
                                                                           261.24 using the method specified        
                                                                           therein. The annual analytical results,  
                                                                           including quality control information,   
                                                                           must be compiled, certified according to 
                                                                           Sec. 260.22(i)(12), maintained on site   
                                                                           for a minimum of five years, and made    
                                                                           available for inspection upon request by 
                                                                           any employee or representative of EPA or 
                                                                           the State of Connecticut. Failure to     
                                                                           maintain the required records on site    
                                                                           will be considered by EPA, at its        
                                                                           discretion, sufficient basis to revoke   
                                                                           the exclusion to the extent directed by  
                                                                           EPA.                                     
                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                    
                                                      * * * * * * *                                                 
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    [FR Doc. 94-8576 Filed 4-8-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/11/1994
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Proposed amendment and request for comment.
Document Number:
94-8576
Dates:
EPA is requesting public comments on this proposed amendment. Comments will be accepted until May 11, 1994. Comments postmarked after the close of the comment period will be stamped ``late''.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: April 11, 1994, SW-FRL-4861-9
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 260.22(i)(12)