94-8692. Entergy Operations, Inc., System Energy Resources, Inc., South Mississippi Electric Power Association, Mississippi Power and Light Co.; Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment to Facility Operating License and Opportunity for a ...  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 12, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-8692]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: April 12, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    [Docket No. 50-416]
    
     
    
    Entergy Operations, Inc., System Energy Resources, Inc., South 
    Mississippi Electric Power Association, Mississippi Power and Light 
    Co.; Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment to Facility 
    Operating License and Opportunity for a Hearing
    
        The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is 
    considering issuance of an amendment to Facility Operating License No. 
    NPF-29, issued to Entergy Operations, Inc. (the licensee), for 
    operation of the Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 1, located in 
    Claiborne County, Louisiana.
        The proposed amendment, requested by the licensee by letter of 
    October 15, 1993, would represent a full conversion from the current 
    Technical Specifications (TS) to a set of TS based on NUREG-1434, 
    ``Improved BWR/6 Technical Specifications,'' Revision O, September 
    1992. NUREG-1434 has been developed through working groups composed of 
    both NRC staff members and the BWR/6 owners and has been endorsed by 
    the staff as part of an industry-wide initiative to standardize and 
    improve TS. As part of this submittal, the licensee has applied the 
    criteria contained in the Final NRC Policy Statement on Technical 
    Specification Improvements to the current Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, 
    Unit 1 Technical Specifications utilizing BWR Owners' Group (BWROG) 
    report NEDO-31466, ``Technical Specification Screening Criteria 
    Application and Risk Assessment,'' (and Supplement 1) as incorporated 
    in NUREG-1434.
        The licensee has categorized the proposed changes into four general 
    groupings. These groupings are characterized as administrative changes, 
    relocated changes, more restrictive changes, and less restrictive 
    changes.
        Administrative changes are those that involve reformatting, 
    renumbering and rewording of the existing TS. The reformatting, 
    renumbering and rewording process reflects the attributes of NUREG-1434 
    and do not involve technical changes to the existing TS. Such changes 
    are administrative in nature and do not impact initiators of analyzed 
    events or assumed mitigation of accident or transient events.
        Relocated changes are those involving relocation of requirements 
    and surveillances for structures, systems, components or variables that 
    do not meet the criteria of inclusion in TS as identified in the 
    Application of Selection Criteria to the Grand Gulf Nuclear Station TS. 
    The affected structures, systems, components or variables are not 
    assumed to be initiators of analyzed events and are not assumed to 
    mitigate accident or transient events. The requirements and 
    surveillances for these affected structures, systems, components or 
    variables will be relocated from the TS to administratively controlled 
    documents. Changes to these documents will be made pursuant to 10 CFR 
    50.59. In addition, the affected structures, systems, components or 
    variables are addressed in existing surveillance procedures which are 
    subject to 10 CFR 50.59 and subject to the change control provision in 
    the Administrative Controls Section of the TS. These proposed changes 
    will not impose or eliminate any requirements.
        More restrictive changes are those involving more stringent 
    requirements for operation of the facility. These more stringent 
    requirements do not result in operation that will alter assumptions 
    relative to mitigation of an accident or transient event. The more 
    restrictive requirements continue to ensure process variables, 
    structures, systems and components are maintained consistent with the 
    safety analyses and licensing basis.
        Changes characterized as less restrictive have been subdivided into 
    four additional subcategories. They include:
        a. Relocating details to TS Bases, the Updated Safety Analysis 
    Report (USAR), or procedures. The requirements to be transposed from 
    the TS to the Bases, USAR or procedures are the same as those currently 
    included in the existing TS. The TS Bases, USAR and procedures 
    containing the relocated information are subject to 10 CFR 50.59 and 
    are subject to the change control provisions in the Administrative 
    Controls section of the TS.
        b. Extension of instrumentation surveillance test intervals (STIs) 
    and allowed outage times (AOTs). The proposed changes affect only the 
    STIs and AOTs and will not impact the function of monitoring system 
    variables over the anticipated ranges for normal operation, anticipated 
    operational occurrences, or accident conditions. However, the changes 
    are expected to reduce the test related plant scrams and test induced 
    wear on the equipment. General Electric Topical Reports GENE-770-06-1 
    and GENE-770-06-2 showed that the effects of these extensions of STIs 
    and AOTs, which produced negligible impact, are bounded by previous 
    analyses. Further, the NRC has reviewed these reports and approved the 
    conclusions on a generic basis.
        c. Relocation of instrumentation only requirements (which provide 
    no post-accident function). These requirements are part of the routine 
    operational monitoring and are not considered in the safety analysis. 
    Changes made to the Bases, USAR, and procedures containing the 
    relocated information will be made in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59 and 
    are subject to the change control provisions in the Administrative 
    Controls section of the TS. These proposed changes will not impose or 
    eliminate any requirements.
        d. Other less restrictive changes. Additional changes that result 
    in less restrictions in the TS are discussed individually in the 
    licensee's submittal.
        Before issuance of the proposed license amendment, the Commission 
    will have made findings required by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
    amended (the Act) and the Commission's regulations.
        By May 12, 1994, the licensee may file a request for a hearing with 
    respect to issuance of the amendment to the subject facility operating 
    license and any person whose interest may be affected by this 
    proceeding and who wishes to participate as a party in the proceeding 
    must file a written request for a hearing and a petition for leave to 
    intervene. Requests for a hearing and petitions for leave to intervene 
    shall be filed in accordance with the Commission's ``Rules of Practice 
    for Domestic Licensing Proceedings'' in 10 CFR part 2. Interested 
    persons should consult a current copy of 10 CFR 2.714, which is 
    available at the Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman 
    Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC 20555 and at the local 
    public document room located at the Judge George W. Armstrong Library, 
    Post Office Box 1406, S. Commerce at Washington, Natchez, Mississippi 
    39120. If a request for a hearing or petition for leave to intervene is 
    filed by the above date, the Commission or an Atomic Safety and 
    Licensing Board, designated by the Commission or by the Chairman of the 
    Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, will rule on the request and/
    or petition, and the Secretary or the designated Atomic Safety and 
    Licensing Board will issue a notice of hearing or an appropriate order.
        As required by 10 CFR 2.714, a petition for leave to intervene 
    shall set forth with particularity the interest of the petitioner in 
    the proceeding, and how that interest may be affected by the results of 
    the proceeding. The petition should specifically explain the reasons 
    why intervention should be permitted with particular reference to the 
    following factors: (1) The nature of the petitioner's right under the 
    Act to be made a party to the proceeding; (2) the nature and extent of 
    the petitioner's property, financial, or other interest in the 
    proceeding; and (3) the possible effect of any order which may be 
    entered in the proceeding on the petitioner's interest. The petition 
    should also identify the specific aspect(s) of the subject matter of 
    the proceeding as to which petitioner wishes to intervene. Any person 
    who has filed a petition for leave intervene or who has been admitted 
    as a party may amend the petition without requesting leave of the Board 
    up to fifteen (15) days prior to the first prehearing conference 
    scheduled in the proceeding, but such an amended petition must satisfy 
    the specificity requirements described above.
        Not later than fifteen (15) days prior to the first prehearing 
    conference scheduled in the proceeding, a petitioner shall file a 
    supplement to the petition to intervene which must include a list of 
    the contentions which are sought to be litigated in the matter. Each 
    contention must consist of a specific statement of the issue of law or 
    fact to be raised or controverted. In addition, the petitioner shall 
    provide a brief explanation of the bases of the contention and a 
    concise statement of the alleged facts or expert opinion which support 
    the contention and on which the petitioner intends to rely in proving 
    the contention at the hearing. The petitioner must also provide 
    references to those specific sources and documents of which the 
    petitioner is aware and on which the petitioner intends to rely to 
    establish those facts or expert opinion. Petitioner must provide 
    sufficient information to show that a genuine dispute exists with the 
    applicant on material issue of law or fact. Contentions shall be 
    limited to matters within the scope of the amendments under 
    consideration. The contention must be one which, if proven, would 
    entitle the petitioner to relief. A petitioner who fails to file such a 
    supplement which satisfies these requirements with respect to at least 
    one contention will not be permitted to participate as a party.
        Those permitted to intervene become parties to the proceeding, 
    subject to any limitations in the order granting leave to intervene, 
    and have the opportunity to participate fully in the conduct of the 
    hearing, including the opportunity to present evidence and cross-
    examine witnesses.
        A request for a hearing or a petition for leave to intervene must 
    be filed with the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
    Commission, Washington, DC 20555, Attention: Docketing and Services 
    Branch, or may be delivered to the Commission's Public Document Room, 
    the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW, Washington, DC, by the above 
    date. Where petitions are filed during the last ten (10) days of the 
    notice period, it is requested that the petitioner promptly so inform 
    the Commission by a toll-free telephone call to Western Union at 1-
    (800) 248-5100 (in Missouri 1-(800) 342-6700). The Western Union 
    operator should be given Datagram Identification Number N1023 and the 
    following message addressed to William D. Beckner, Director, Project 
    Directorate IV-1: petitioner's name and telephone number, date petition 
    was mailed, plant name, and publication date and page number of the 
    Federal Register notice. A copy of the petition should also be sent to 
    the Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 
    Washington, DC 20555, and to Nicholas S. Reynolds, Esq., Winston & 
    Strawn, 1400 L Street, NW., 12th Floor, Washington, DC 20005-3502, 
    attorney for the licensee.
        Nontimely filings of petitions for leave to intervene, amended 
    petitions, supplemental petitions and/or requests for hearing will not 
    be entertained absent a determination by the Commission, the presiding 
    officer, or the presiding Atomic Safety and Licensing Board that the 
    petition and/or request should be granted based upon a balancing of the 
    factors specified in 10 CFR 2.714(a)(1)(i)-(v) and 2.714(d).
        If a request for a hearing is received, the Commission's staff may 
    issue the amendment after it completes its technical review and prior 
    to the completion of any required hearing if it publishes a further 
    notice for public comment of its proposed finding of no significant 
    hazards considerations in accordance with 10 CFR 50.91 and 50.92.
        For further details with respect to this action, see the 
    application for amendment dated October 15, 1993, which is available 
    for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, the 
    Gelman Building 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC 20555, and at the 
    local public document room, located at the Judge George W. Armstrong 
    Library, Post Office Box 1406, S. Commerce at Washington, Natchez, 
    Mississippi 39120.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 5th day of April 1994.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Paul W. O'Connor,
    Senior Project Manager, Project Directorate IV-I, Division of Reactor 
    Projects III/IV, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 94-8692 Filed 4-11-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/12/1994
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-8692
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: April 12, 1994, Docket No. 50-416