95-8727. Beauveria Bassiana Strain GHA; Tolerance Exemption  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 70 (Wednesday, April 12, 1995)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 18546-18547]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-8727]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    40 CFR Part 180
    
    [PP 4F4318/R2118; FRL-4945-2]
    RIN 2070-AB78
    
    
    Beauveria Bassiana Strain GHA; Tolerance Exemption
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This rule establishes an exemption from the requirement for a 
    tolerance for residues of Beauveria bassiana Strain GHA in or on all 
    raw agricultural commodities. Mycotech Corp. requested this exemption.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: This regulation becomes effective April 12, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written objections, identified by the document control 
    number, [PP4F4318/R2118], may be submitted to: Hearing Clerk (1900), 
    Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. M3708, 401 M St., SW., Washington, 
    DC 20460. A copy of any objections and hearing requests filed with the 
    Hearing Clerk should be identified by the document control number and 
    submitted to: Public Response and Program Resources Branch, Field 
    Operations Division (7506C), Office of Pesticide Programs, 
    Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW, Washington, DC 20460. 
    In person, bring a copy of objections and hearing request to Rm. 1132, 
    CM #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202. Fees 
    accompanying objections shall be labeled ``Tolerance Petition Fees'' 
    and forwarded to : EPA Headquarters Accounting Operations Branch, OPP 
    (Tolerance Fees), P.O. Box 360277M, Pittsburgh, PA 15251.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Patricia A. Cimino, 
    Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division (7501W), Office of 
    Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., 
    Washington, DC 20460, (703)-308-7035; e-mail: 
    Cimino.Patricia@epamail.epa.gov.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of July 13, 1994 (59 
    FR 35718), EPA issued a notice that Mycotech Corp., 630 Utah Drive, 
    P.O. Box 4109, Butte, MT 59701, had submitted pesticide petition PP 
    4F4318 proposing to amend 40 CFR part 180 by establishing a regulation 
    pursuant to section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 
    (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d), to exempt from the requirement of a 
    tolerance the residues of the microbial pest control agent Beauveria 
    bassiana Strain GHA in or on alfalfa, corn, potatoes, rapeseed, 
    safflower, small grain crops, soybeans, sugarbeets, sunflower, 
    rangeland, improved pastures, and in meat, milk or other animal 
    products from livestock grazed on treated rangeland or improved 
    pastures when applied to growing crops in accordance with good 
    agricultural practices.
        There were no comments received in response to the notice of 
    filing.
        In the Federal Register of February 8, 1995 (60 FR 7543), EPA 
    issued a notice that Mycotech Corp., 630 Utah Drive, P.O. Box 4109, 
    Butte, MT 59701, had submitted an amendment to a pesticide petition, PP 
    4F4318, proposing to amend 40 CFR part 180 by establishing a regulation 
    pursuant to section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 
    (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d), to exempt from the requirement of a 
    tolerance the residues of the microbial pest control agent Beauveria 
    bassiana Strain GHA in or on all raw agricultural commodities.
        Beauveria bassiana Strain GHA is naturally occurring and was 
    originally isolated from indigenous grasshoppers.
        The data submitted in the petition and all other relevant material 
    have been evaluated. The toxicological data considered in support of 
    the exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for Beauveria 
    bassiana Strain GHA in or on all raw agricultural crops include an 
    acute oral toxicity/pathogenicity study, an acute dermal toxicity 
    study, an acute pulmonary toxicity/pathogenicity study, an acute 
    intraperitoneal toxicity/pathogenicity study, and primary eye 
    irritation studies.
        The results of these studies indicated that the organism was not 
    toxic to test animals when administered via oral, dermal, pulmonary, or 
    intraperitoneal routes.
        The active ingredient was not infective or pathogenic to the test 
    animals in any of the studies. Ocular lesions were observed in the eye 
    irritation studies with the technical-grade active ingredient (TGAI) 
    and a wettable powder (WP) formulation and resulted in a Toxicity 
    Category I rating for these products. Minimal ocular irritation was 
    observed in the eye irritation studies done with oil flowable and 
    emulsifiable suspension end-use product formulations indicating that 
    the lesions observed in the eye irritation tests done with TGAI and the 
    WP formulations may have been due to physical effects of the TGAI and 
    inert ingredients. Slight skin irritation persisted in test animals 
    treated with the TGAI resulting in a Toxicity Category III rating. 
    There have been no reports of hypersensitivity related to the active 
    ingredient. All of the toxicity studies submitted are considered 
    acceptable.
        The toxicology data provided are sufficient to demonstrate that 
    there are no foreseeable human health hazards likely to arise from use 
    of Beauveria bassiana Strain GHA on the requested food and feed 
    commodities when applied during the growing season in accordance with 
    good agricultural practices.
        Acceptable daily intake (ADI) and maximum permissible intake (MPI) 
    considerations are not relevant to this petition because the data 
    submitted demonstrated that this biological control agent is not toxic 
    to humans by dietary exposure. No enforcement actions are 
    [[Page 18547]] expected based on a level of residues in food. 
    Therefore, the requirement for an analytical method for enforcement 
    purposes is not applicable to this exemption request. This is the 
    second exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for this microbial 
    pest control agent. The first exemption appeared in the Federal 
    Register of March 24, 1990 (60 FR 15488).
        Based on the information considered, the Agency concludes that 
    establishment of a tolerance is not necessary to protect the public 
    health. Therefore, the exemption from tolerance is established as set 
    forth below.
        Any person adversely affected by this regulation may, within 30 
    days after publication of this document in the Federal Register, file 
    written objections and/or request a hearing with the Hearing Clerk, at 
    the address given above (40 CFR 178.20). A copy of the objections and/
    or hearing requests filed with the Hearing Clerk should be submitted to 
    the OPP docket for this rulemaking. The objections submitted must 
    specify the provisions of the regulation deemed objectionable and the 
    grounds for the objections and the relief sought (40 CFR 178.25). Each 
    objection must be accompanied by the fee prescribed by 40 CFR 
    180.33(i). If a hearing is requested, the objections must include a 
    statement of the factual issue(s) on which a hearing is requested, the 
    requestor's contentions on such issues, and a summary of any evidence 
    relied upon by the objector (40 CFR 178.27). A request for a hearing 
    will be granted if the Administrator determines that the material 
    submitted shows the following: There is genuine and substantial issue 
    of fact; there is a reasonable possibility that available evidence 
    identified by the requestor would, if established, resolve one or more 
    of such issues in favor of the requestor, taking into account 
    uncontested claims or facts to the contrary; and resolution of the 
    factual issues(s) in the manner sought by the requestor would be 
    adequate to justify the action requested (40 CFR 178.32).
        Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 1993), the Agency 
    must determine whether the regulatory action is ``significant'' and 
    therefore subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget 
    (OMB) and the requirements of the Executive Order. Under section 3(f), 
    the order defines a ``significant regulatory action'' as an action that 
    is likely to result in a rule (1) having an annual effect on the 
    economy of $100 million or more, or adversely and materially affecting 
    a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the 
    environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal 
    governments or communities (also known as ``economically 
    significant''); (2) creating serious inconsistency or otherwise 
    interfering with an action taken or planned by another agency; (3) 
    materially altering the budgetary impacts of entitlement, grants, user 
    fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients 
    thereof; or (4) raising novel legal or policy issues arising out of 
    legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth 
    in this Executive Order.
        Pursuant to the terms of Executive Order, EPA has determined that 
    this rule is not ``significant'' and is therefore not subject to OMB 
    review.
        Pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act 
    (Pub. L. 96-354, 94 Stat. 1164, 5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Administrator 
    has determined that regulations establishing new tolerances or raising 
    tolerance levels or establishing exemptions from tolerance requirements 
    do not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
    small entities. A certification statement to this effect was published 
    in the Federal Register of May 4, 1981 (46 FR 24950).
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
    
        Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
    Agricultural commodities, Pesticide and pests, Reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements.
    
        Dated: March 29, 1995.
    
    Janet L. Andersen,
    Director, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division, Office of 
    Pesticide Programs.
    
    PART 180--[AMENDED]
    
        Therefore, 40 CFR part 180 is amended as follows:
        1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 371.
    
        2. In Subpart D, by revising Sec. 180.1146, to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 180.1146   Beauveria bassiana Strain GHA; exemption from the 
    requirement of a tolerance.
    
        Beauveria bassiana Strain GHA is exempted from the requirement of a 
    tolerance in or on all raw agricultural commodities when applied to 
    growing crops according to good agricultural practices.
    
    [FR Doc. 95-8727 Filed 4-11-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
4/12/1995
Published:
04/12/1995
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
95-8727
Dates:
This regulation becomes effective April 12, 1995.
Pages:
18546-18547 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
PP 4F4318/R2118, FRL-4945-2
RINs:
2070-AB78
PDF File:
95-8727.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 180.1146