96-9146. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change by the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. Relating to Examinations  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 72 (Friday, April 12, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 16274-16277]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-9146]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Release No. 34-37067; File No. SR-CHX-96-11]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule 
    Change by the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. Relating to Examinations
    
    April 4, 1996.
        Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
    (``Act''), 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1), notice is hereby given that on March 6, 
    1996, the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. (``CHX'' or ``Exchange'') filed 
    with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'' or ``SEC'') 
    the proposed rule change, on March 18, 1996, filed Amendment No. 1 to 
    the proposed rule change,\1\ and on April 4, 1996, filed Amendment No. 
    2 to the proposed rule change,\2\ as described in Items I, II and III 
    below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory 
    organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
    
    [[Page 16275]]
    
    comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ See Letter from David T. Rusoff, Foley & Lardner, to Elisa 
    Metzger, SEC dated March 14, 1996 (``Amendment No. 1'').
        \2\ See Letter from Charles R. Haywood, Foley & Lardner, to 
    Elisa Metzger, SEC dated April 4, 1996 (``Amendment No. 2'').
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
    of the Proposed Rule Change
    
        The Exchange proposes to amend Rules 2 and 3 of Article VI (and the 
    interpretations and policies thereunder) to clarify existing rules, 
    adopt a new Floor Membership Exam, adopt a new Market Maker Exam, adopt 
    a new Co-Specialist Exam, and adopt examinations applicable to persons 
    conducting a customer business from the CHX trading floor. The Exchange 
    also proposes to adopt the Content Outline for the Examination Module 
    for Floor Members Engaged in a Public Business with Professional 
    Customers and the Content Outline for the Examination Module for Floor 
    Clerks of Members engaged in a Public Business with Professional 
    Customers (collectively, the ``Content Outline'').\3\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \3\ The Exchange will use the Series 7A Examination that was 
    approved in Sec. Exch. Act Release No. 32698 (July 29, 1993), 58 FR 
    41539 (File No. SR-NYSE-93-10). The Exchange will use the Series 7B 
    Examination that was approved in Sec. Exch. Act Release No. 34334 
    (July 8, 1994) 59 FR 35964 (File No. SR-NYSE-94-13). The Series 7A 
    and 7B Examinations for CHX members will be administered by the 
    National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (``NASD'').
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
        In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
    included statement concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed 
    rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule 
    change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places 
    specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization has 
    prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the 
    most significant aspects of such statements.
    
    A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
    1. Purpose
        CHX Rule 3, Article VI authorizes the Exchange to require the 
    successful completion of an examination in connection with the 
    registration of partners, officers, options principals, branch officer 
    managers and registered representatives of member firms and member 
    corporations. Pursuant to this Rule, in 1987 the Commission approved 
    the use of the Series 7 examination by the CHX to qualify persons 
    seeking registration as general securities representatives. The purpose 
    of the proposed rule change is to (1) Adopt the requirement that 
    members located on the floor of the CHX who wish to accept orders 
    directly from the public must take and pass the Series 7 examination; 
    (2) allow members located on the floor of the CHX to accept orders 
    directly from professional investors for execution on the trading floor 
    without taking the Series 7 exam so long as they take and pass the 
    Series 7A exam; (3) allow floor clerks/ floor employees to accept 
    orders from professional customers in support of members or member 
    organizations previously approved to conduct a public business so long 
    as they take and pass the Series 7B exam, (4) codify the existing 
    requirement that all potential floor members successfully complete a 
    ``Floor Membership Exam'' (5) codify the existing requirement that all 
    potential market makers successfully complete a ``Market Maker Exam'' 
    in addition to the Floor Membership Exam; and (6) codify the existing 
    requirement that all potential co-specialists successfully complete a 
    ``Co-Specialist'' exam in addition to the Floor Membership Exam, all as 
    more fully described below.
    
    Series 7
    
        All floor members that accept orders directly from non-broker-
    dealer will be deemed to be transacting business with the public. As 
    such, except as provided below, any person accepting such orders must 
    successfully complete the Series 7 examination. This requirement is in 
    proposed interpretation and policy .01(d) to Rule 3 of Article VI of 
    the CHX Rules.
    
    Series 7A
    
        The level of knowledge, skills and abilities required to perform 
    the activities engaged in by Exchange members who conduct a public 
    business that is limited to accepting orders from professional 
    investors is less than needed to conduct a full service business with 
    retail customers. As a result, the NYSE has developed the Series 7A 
    Examination as a module of the General Securities Registered 
    Representative Examination (``Series 7'') to test the knowledge of 
    relevant securities laws and Exchange rules required of members who 
    accept orders from professional customers \4\ for execution on the 
    trading floor. The CHX proposes to amend its Interpretations and 
    Policies to Rule 3, Article VI to establish a new limited registration 
    category for floor members who have successfully completed the Series 
    7A examination.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\ The proposal defines a professional customer to include: a 
    bank; trust company; insurance company; investment trust; state or 
    political subdivision thereof; charitable or nonprofit educational 
    institution regulated under the laws of the United States or any 
    state or pension or profit sharing plan subject to ERISA or of an 
    agency of the United States or of a state or a political subdivision 
    thereof; or any person who has, or has under management, net 
    tangible assets of at least sixteen million dollars. As used in this 
    definition, the term ``person'' would not include natural persons.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        This new limited registration will simplify the procedure for CHX 
    members to conduct business with non-broker-dealer professional 
    customers. The Exchange believes that the new examination is 
    appropriate, in lieu of the Series 7, because it nevertheless tests 
    knowledge relevant to conducting a public business. For example, the 
    rules governing customer accounts including rules on excessive trading, 
    approval of accounts and discretionary transactions would be covered by 
    the new exam.
        Conducting a professional customer business from off the CHX 
    trading floor would still require a full Series 7 registration. Of 
    course, persons who are Series 7 registered need not take or pass the 
    Series 7A exam in order to conduct a professional customers business.
    
    Series 7B
    
        The Exchange is adopting the Series 7B examination as a subset of 
    the Series 7 examination to test the knowledge of relevant securities 
    laws and Exchange rules required of floor clerks/floor employees of 
    members who accept public orders only from professional customers for 
    execution on the trading floor. These orders may only be accepted if 
    the member with whom the floor clerk/floor employee works has 
    successfully completed the Series 7 or Series 7A examination. A floor 
    clerk/floor employee that seeks to deal with customers who are not 
    professional customers must successfully complete the Series 7 
    examination. Any person who has successfully completed the Series 7 
    examination will not be required to complete the Series 7B examination.
    
    Implementation
    
        To minimize any burden imposed by the Series 7, Series 7A and 
    Series 7B exam requirements, the Exchange will phase-in these new 
    requirements over a designated period of time after the proposed rule 
    change has been approved. This will provide persons subject to the exam 
    with an opportunity to study for and take the new examinations without 
    unnecessary business disruptions. The phase-in
    
    [[Page 16276]]
    
    period is as follows: (a) Members who were not required to successfully 
    complete the Series 7 or Series 7A examination prior to approval of 
    this rule change and floor clerks/floor employees subject to the Series 
    7B exam will have 180 days from the effective date of this proposed 
    rule change to take the appropriate exam. In the event the member or 
    floor clerk/floor employee fails such examination, such member or floor 
    clerk/floor employee must, nonetheless, successfully complete such 
    examination within 270 days from the effective date of this proposed 
    rule change.
    
    Floor Membership Exam
    
        All new applicants for membership on the Exchange that request a 
    floor presence will be required to successfully complete a revised 
    Floor Membership Exam. This exam tests basic trading knowledge and 
    ability and tests familiarity with the Exchange's trading rules.
    
    Market Maker Exam
    
        In order for a member to become qualified as a market maker after 
    the approval date of this proposed rule change, the member must 
    successfully complete the revised Floor Membership Examination and the 
    revised Market Maker Examination. The revised Market Maker Exam tests 
    the member's understanding of a market maker's duties and obligations. 
    Co-specialists registered as such are exempt from the Market Maker 
    Exam, even if they act as a market maker.
    
    Co-Specialist Exam
    
        In order for a member to be qualified as a co-specialist after the 
    approval date of this proposed rule change, the member must 
    successfully complete the revised Co-Specialist Exam. A member is 
    eligible to take the exam if the member has successfully completed the 
    Floor Membership Exam and has been recognized by the Floor Procedure 
    Committee as a Member/Relief Specialist under supervision for at least 
    90 days. Upon passing the Co-Specialist Exam, the co-specialist may 
    petition the Floor Procedure Committee to be removed from supervision 
    and to function as a co-specialist.
    
    Registration of Personnel
    
        The proposed rule change also clarifies current Exchange 
    requirements for registering personnel and makes technical changes to 
    the registration procedure. The proposed rule change adds a definition 
    of ``control person'' to Article VI, Rule 2 and specifies that all such 
    persons at, as well as certain other shareholders of, members and 
    member organization must be acceptable to the Exchange.\5\ 
    Additionally, the proposed change clarifies that nominees of member 
    firms must be registered with the Exchange.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \5\ A ``control person'' is a person with the power, directly or 
    indirectly, to direct the management or policies of a company 
    whether through ownership of securities, by contract or otherwise, 
    and at a minimum, means all directors, general partners or officers 
    exercising executive responsibility (or having similar status or 
    functions), all persons directly or indirectly having the right to 
    vote 10% or more of a class of a voting security or having the power 
    to sell or direct the sale of 10% or more of a class of voting 
    securities, or in the case of a partnership, having the right to 
    receive upon dissolution, as having contributed, 10% or more of the 
    capital.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The filing also makes technical changes to Rule 2 of Article VI. In 
    this regard, the filing changes the term ``Form B/D'' to ``Form BD,'' 
    changes ``Schedule D'' to ``Schedule DRP,'' and changes ``Series VII'' 
    to ``Series 7'' to conform to recent changes in the names of those 
    forms. In addition, the filing changes the term ``exchange'' to ``self-
    regulatory organization'' in order to include within the language of 
    the rule self-regulatory organizations that do not meet the statutory 
    definition of ``exchange,'' such as the National Association of 
    Securities Dealers.\6\ The filing moves Interpretation and Policy. 01, 
    .02, and .03 from Rue 3 of Article VI to Rule 2 of that Article \7\ and 
    moves the location of a portion of Interpretation and Policy .02(b) of 
    Rule 2 relating to options to another location in the same 
    interpretation. The proposed rule change revises Interpretation and 
    Policy .01(2) of Rule 2, Article VI to delete the requirement that a 
    Notice of Acceptance of Registration Form from the NASD be submitted to 
    the Exchange because this form no longer exists. The proposed rule 
    change also deletes Interpretation and Policy .01(3) of Rule 2, Article 
    VI because revised Interpretation and Policy .01 gives the Exchange the 
    authority to permit firms to submit revised forms directly to any SRO. 
    Thus, the carve-out for NYSE member firms provided for in this 
    interpretation is no longer needed.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \6\ The term ``self-regulatory organization'' is to have the 
    statutory meaning. See Amendment No. 2.
        \7\ In Interpretation and Policy .02, the change from ``would 
    be'' to ``are'' is a stylistic change intended to make no 
    substantive alteration in the rule. See Amendment No. 2.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The proposed rule change also revises Rule 2 of Article VI, 
    Interpretation and Policy .01 to clarify the procedures to be followed 
    when registering persons with the Exchange. Specifically, a member firm 
    that registers persons with the Exchange must submit, among other 
    things, a completed Form U-4 for such individual to the Exchange (or to 
    another SRO designated by the Exchange). The member firm must also 
    submit an amended Form BD for the firm if the individual's registration 
    requires the Form BD to be amended. Additionally, the member firm must 
    update its Form BD and Form U-4s whenever information on those Forms 
    becomes inaccurate or incomplete.
        Finally the filing proposes to amend Rule 3 of Article VI to 
    clarify that the examinations and training courses required by the rule 
    apply to individual members as well as persons at member firms and 
    member organizations.
    2. Statutory Basis
        The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6 of the Act in 
    general, and in particular, with Section 6(b)(5), in that it is 
    designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, remove 
    impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and 
    a national market system, as well as to protect investors and the 
    public interest. The examination requirements are intended to protect 
    investors and the public interest.
        The proposed rule change is also consistent with Section 6(c)(3)(B) 
    of the Act, which provides that a national securities exchange may 
    examine and verify the qualifications of an applicant to become a 
    person associated with a member in accordance with procedures 
    established by the rules of the exchange, and require any person 
    associated with a member, or any class of such persons, to be 
    registered with the exchange in accordance with procedures so 
    established. Finally, the Exchange also believes that the proposed rule 
    change is consistent with Section 15(b)(7) in that it is designed to 
    ensure that a registered broker or dealer, prior to effecting any 
    transaction in, or inducing the purchase or sale of, any security, meet 
    certain standards of operational capability, training, experience, or 
    competence.
    
    B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
    
        The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
    impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
    in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
    
    C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
    Rule Change Received from Members, Participants or Others
    
        The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on 
    the proposed rule change.
    
    [[Page 16277]]
    
    III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
    Commission Action
    
        Within 35 days of the publication of this notice in the Federal 
    Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may 
    designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to 
    be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to 
    which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
        (A) by order approve the proposed rule change, or
        (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule 
    change should be disapproved.
    
    IV. Solicitation of Comments
    
        Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
    arguments concerning the foregoing. Persons making written submissions 
    should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and 
    Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. 
    Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
    statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
    the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
    rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
    that may be withheld form the public in accordance with the provisions 
    of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying at the 
    Commission's Public Reference Section, 450 Fifth Street, NW., 
    Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such filing will also be available for 
    inspection and copying at the principal office of the CHX. All 
    submissions should refer to File No. SR-CHX-96-11 and should be 
    submitted by May 3, 1996.
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 96-9146 Filed 4-11-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/12/1996
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
96-9146
Pages:
16274-16277 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-37067, File No. SR-CHX-96-11
PDF File:
96-9146.pdf