2011-8706. Release of Draft Integrated Review Plan for the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Lead
-
Start Preamble
AGENCY:
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION:
Notice of availability.
SUMMARY:
On or about March 31, 2011, the EPA is making available for public review the draft Integrated Review Plan for the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Lead (draft IRP). This document contains the plans for the review of the air quality criteria and national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for lead (Pb). The Pb NAAQS provide for the protection of public health and the environment from Pb in ambient air.
DATES:
Comments should be submitted by April 28, 2011.
ADDRESSES:
This document will be available primarily via the Internet at the following Web site: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/standards/pb/s_pb_index.html. Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0108, by one of the following methods:
- http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
- E-mail: a-and-r-Docket@epa.gov.
- Fax: 202-566-9744.
- Mail: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0108, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail code 6102T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460. Please include a total of two copies.
- Hand Delivery: Environmental Protection Agency, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0108. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless Start Printed Page 20348the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov (or e-mail). The http://www.regulations.gov Web site is an “anonymous access” system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through http://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public docket, visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center is (202) 566-1742.
Start Further InfoFOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dr. Deirdre Murphy, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (Mail code C504-06), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; telephone number: 919-541-0729; fax number: 919-541-0237; e-mail address: murphy.deirdre@epa.gov.
End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental InformationSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM, the specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. When submitting comments, remember to:
- Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
- Follow directions—The agency may ask you to respond to specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
- Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and substitute language for your requested changes.
- Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information and/or data that you used.
- If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be reproduced.
- Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and suggest alternatives.
- Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of profanity or personal threats.
- Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified.
II. Information Specific to This Document
Two sections of the Clean Air Act (CAA) govern the establishment and revision of the NAAQS. Section 108 (42 U.S.C. section 7408) directs the Administrator to identify and list certain air pollutants and then to issue air quality criteria for those pollutants. The Administrator is to list those air pollutants that in her “judgment, cause or contribute to air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare;” “the presence of which in the ambient air results from numerous or diverse mobile or stationary sources;” and “for which * * * [the Administrator] plans to issue air quality criteria * * *” Air quality criteria are intended to “accurately reflect the latest scientific knowledge useful in indicating the kind and extent of all identifiable effects on public health or welfare which may be expected from the presence of [a] pollutant in the ambient air * * *” 42 U.S.C. 7408(b). Under section 109 (42 U.S.C. 7409), EPA establishes primary (health-based) and secondary (welfare-based) NAAQS for pollutants for which air quality criteria are issued. Section 109(d) requires periodic review and, if appropriate, revision of existing air quality criteria. The revised air quality criteria reflect advances in scientific knowledge on the effects of the pollutant on public health or welfare. The EPA is also required to periodically review and revise the NAAQS, if appropriate, based on the revised criteria. Section 109(d)(2) requires that an independent scientific review committee “shall complete a review of the criteria * * * and the national primary and secondary ambient air quality standards * * * and shall recommend to the Administrator any new * * * standards and revisions of existing criteria and standards as may be appropriate * * * .” Since the early 1980's, this independent review function has been performed by the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC).
Presently, EPA is reviewing the NAAQS for Pb.[1] The draft document announced today is being developed as part of the planning phase for the review. This phase began with a science policy workshop to identify issues and questions to frame the review. Drawing from the workshop discussions, a draft integrated review plan (IRP) has been prepared jointly by EPA's National Center for Environmental Assessment, within the Office of Research and Development, and EPA's Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, within the Office of Air and Radiation. This document will be available on the EPA's Technology Transfer Network (TTN) Web site at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/standards/pb/s_pb_index.html. The document will be accessible in the Start Printed Page 20349“Documents from Current Review” section under “Planning Documents.”
The draft IRP is being made available for consultation with CASAC and for public comment. Comments should be submitted to the docket, as described above, by April 28, 2011. The CASAC consultation on this planning document is scheduled for May 5, 2011. A separate Federal Register notice will provide details about this meeting and the process for participation. The final IRP will be prepared in consideration of CASAC and public comments. The draft document announced today presents the current plan and specifies the schedule for the entire review, the process for conducting the review, and the key policy-relevant science issues that will guide the review. This draft document does not represent and should not be construed to represent any final EPA policy, viewpoint, or determination.
Start SignatureDated: April 6, 2011.
Mary Henigin,
Acting Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
Footnotes
1. The EPA's call for information for this review was issued on February 26, 2010 (75 FR 8934).
Back to Citation[FR Doc. 2011-8706 Filed 4-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Document Information
- Published:
- 04/12/2011
- Department:
- Environmental Protection Agency
- Entry Type:
- Notice
- Action:
- Notice of availability.
- Document Number:
- 2011-8706
- Dates:
- Comments should be submitted by April 28, 2011.
- Pages:
- 20347-20349 (3 pages)
- Docket Numbers:
- EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0108, FRL-9292-8
- PDF File:
- 2011-8706.pdf
- Supporting Documents:
- » Bellinger, D.; Leviton, A.; Waternaux, C.; Needleman, H.; Rabinowitz, M. (1989). Low-level lead exposure, social class, and infant development. Neurotoxicology and Teratology 10: 497-503.
- » Kirrane, E. 2016. Memorandum to Lead NAAQS Review Docket (EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0108). Provisional Consideration of "New" Studies Cited by Commenters. Jun 28, 2016.
- » Xie, X.; Ding, G.; Cui, C.; Chen, L.; Gao, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Shi, R.; Tian, Y. (2013). The effects of low-level prenatal lead exposure on birth outcomes. Environ Pollution 175:30-34.
- » New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. (2010). Lead poisoning: prevention identification, and management. City Health Information 29(5):41-48, at 41, 43-44.
- » National Toxicology Program. (2011). Draft Monograph on Health Effects of Low-Level Lead, October 14, 2011. Office of Health Assessment and Translation, Division of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. Peer
- » Nishioka E, Yokoyama K, Matsukawa T, Vigeh M, Hirayama S, Ueno T, Miida T, Makino Sh, Takeda S. (2014). Evidence that birth weight is decreased by maternal lead levels below 5?g/dl in male newborns. Reproductive Toxicol 47:21-26
- » UNEP. Leaded Petrol Phase-out: Global Status as at January 2016. Map.
- » Jakubowski, M. (2011). Low-Level Environmental Lead Exposure and Intellectual Impairment in Children – The Current Concepts of Risk Assessment. Int. J Occup Med Environ Health. 24(1): 1-7
- » Jacobs, D.E.; Cali, S.; Welch, A.; Catalin, B.; Dixon, S.L.; Evens, A.; Mucha, A.P.; Vahl, N.; Erdal, S.; Bartlett, J. (2013). Lead and other heavy metals in fust fall from single-family housing demolition. Public Health Reports 128:454-462.
- » Henn, B.C.; Coull, B.A.; Wright, R.O. (2014). Chemical mixtures and children’s health. Curr Opin Pediatr 26:223-229.