94-8865. Job Training Partnership Act: Microenterprise Grant Program  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 71 (Wednesday, April 13, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-8865]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: April 13, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
    [SGA No. DAA 94-006]
    
     
    
    Job Training Partnership Act: Microenterprise Grant Program
    
    agency: Employment and Training Administration, Labor.
    
    action: Notice of availability of funds and solicitation for grant 
    application (SGA).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    summary: The U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training 
    Administration, under section 499 of the Job Training Partnership Act 
    (JTPA), announces the availability of funds to implement and enhance 
    community based microenterprise activities.
        The grants will provide training, technical assistance, and support 
    to microenterprise owners or potential owners. It is anticipated that 
    up to six (6) awards, contingent upon resources being available for 
    this purpose, will be made in the range of $250,000 to $300,000 per 
    grant. Awards will be made on a competitive basis.
        The duration of the grants will be for fifteen (15) months with the 
    possibility of a one-year option. In order to receive a grant award, an 
    applicant must include matching non-Federal contributions in an amount 
    equal to 100 percent of Federal funds to be provided. All the 
    information needed to submit a proposal is included in this 
    announcement.
    
    dates: Application for grant wards will be accepted commencing April 
    13, 1994. The closing date for receipt of applications shall be June 
    13, 1994, at 2 p.m. (Eastern Time).
    
    addresses: Applications shall be mailed to the Division of Acquisition 
    and Assistance, Attention: Brenda Banks, Reference: SGA/DAA 94-006, 
    Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, room 
    S-4302, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
    
    for further information contact: Brenda Banks, Division of Acquisition 
    and Assistance. Telephone (202) 219-8702 (this is not a toll free 
    number).
    
    supplementary information: The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), 
    Employment and Training Administration (ETA) is soliciting proposals on 
    a competitive basis for grants for projects to implement and enhance 
    community-based microenterprise activities. For purposes of this 
    solicitation, the term ``microenterprise'' means a commercial 
    enterprise with five (5) or fewer employees, one (1) or more of whom 
    owns the enterprise, and each of the owners of the enterprise is 
    economically disadvantaged, as defined in section 4(8) of JTPA.
        The intent of these grants is to provide effective business-related 
    training and provide technical assistance and support to owners or 
    potential owners of microenterprises. The grants are being awarded 
    pursuant to section 499 of the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA).
        This announcement consists of five parts: Part I--Background, Part 
    II--Application Process, Part III--Statement of Work, Part IV--
    Evaluation Criteria, and Part V--Reporting Requirements.
    
    Part I--Background
    
        Pursuant to section 499 of JTPA, the Secretary of Labor awards 
    grants to States to implement and enhance community-based 
    microenterprise activities. Section 499 of JTPA also states that such 
    activities shall be for the benefit of economically disadvantaged 
    persons.
        Accordingly, ETA intends to allocate approximately $1.5 million to 
    States to implement and enhance community-based microenterprise 
    activities. The statute specifies that such funds shall be used 
    (nothwithstanding the restrictions of section 141(q) of JTPA) to:
    
        (1) Train program staff in such entrepreneurial activities as 
    business plan development, business management, resource inventory 
    design, and marketing approaches, and other activities necessary to 
    provide effective training to persons developing a microenterprise;
        (2) Provide to owners or potential owners of a microenterprise 
    such technical assistance (including technical assistance with 
    respect to business planning, securing funding, marketing, and 
    production of marketing materials) and other assistance as may be 
    necessary to develop microenterprise activities; and
        (3) Provide other microenterprise support (such as peer support 
    program and counseling).
    
    Part II--Application Process
    
    A. Eligible Applicants
    
        Awards under this Solicitation will be made to ``States,'' as 
    defined in section 4(22) and section 499(g)(2) of JTPA. For the 
    purposes of this Solicitation, section 499(g)(2) entities shall 
    include:
    
    
        1. Grantees designated under subsection (c) or (d) of section 
    401 of JTPA to provide services to Indian reservations or Alaska 
    Native villages, or a consortium of such grantees and the State; and
        2. Grantees designated under section 402(c) of JTPA to provide 
    services to migrant seasonal farmworkers, or a consortium of such 
    grantees and the State.
    
    
        A proposal shall be submitted by the Governor or, in the instance 
    of a grantee designated under section 401 or 402, by the grantee. In 
    the instance of a consortium between the State and section 401 and 402 
    grantees, a proposal shall be accomplished by a letter from the 
    Governor ratifying such an arrangement and specifying the agency 
    primarily responsible for the conduct of the project.
        When the Governor submits a proposal on behalf of the State, he or 
    she shall designate the agency which shall be responsible for 
    conducting the project. No more than two proposals may be submitted per 
    eligible applicant.
        A State may specify a political subdivision (county, city, town, 
    township, parish village, etc.) or economic division such as a Service 
    Delivery Area, an Enterprise Community or an Empowerment Zone as the 
    focus of training activity in its proposal.
    
    B. Submission of Proposals
    
        An original and three (3) copies of the proposal shall be 
    submitted. The proposal shall consist of two (2) separate and distinct 
    parts.
        Part I shall contain the cost proposal, consisting of the following 
    items: Standard Form (SF) 424, ``Application for Federal Assistance'' 
    (Appendix No. 1) and SF 424A, ``Budget'' (Appendix No. 2). Also, the 
    budget shall include on a separate page(s) a detailed enumeration of 
    how the matching requirement will be fulfilled. The individual signing 
    the SF 424 on behalf of the State shall represent the responsible 
    financial and administrative entity for the grant should that proposal 
    result in an award.
        Part II shall contain a technical proposal that demonstrates the 
    applicant's capabilities in accordance with the Statement of Work 
    contained in this announcement. Applicants are strongly encouraged to 
    submit a technical proposal of less than thirty (30) pages in length 
    (exclusive of appendices) which sets forth the applicant's explanation 
    of how it proposes to accomplish the elements described in the 
    Statement of Work.
        No cost data or reference to price shall be included in the 
    technical proposal. In order to assist applicants in preparing their 
    proposals and to facilitate the expeditious evaluation by the review 
    panel, proposals should be organized and presented in the same 
    sequential order as the Evaluation Criteria in Part IV of this 
    announcement.
    
    C. Hand-Delivered Proposals
    
        Proposals should be mailed at least five (5) days prior to the 
    closing date. However, if proposals are hand-delivered, they shall be 
    received at the designated place by 2 p.m., Eastern Time by June 13, 
    1994. All overnight mail will be considered to be hand-delivered and 
    must be received at the designated place by the specified closing date. 
    Telegraphed and/or faxed proposals will not be honored. Failure to 
    adhere to the above instructions will be a basis for a determination of 
    nonresponsiveness.
    
    D. Late Proposals
    
        Any proposal received at the office designated in the solicitation 
    after the exact time specified for receipt will not be considered 
    unless it is received before award is made and it--
    
        (1) Was sent by U.S. Postal Service registered or certified mail 
    not later than the fifth calendar day before the date specified for 
    receipt of application (e.g., an offer submitted in response to a 
    solicitation requiring receipt of applications by the 20th of the 
    month must have been mailed by the 15th); or
        (2) Was sent by U.S. Postal Service Express Mail Next Day 
    Service--Post Office to Addressee, not later than 5 p.m. at the 
    place of mailing two working days prior to the date specified for 
    receipt of proposals. The term ``working days'' excludes weekends 
    and U.S. Federal holidays.
    
        The only acceptable evidence to establish the date of mailing of a 
    late proposal sent either by U.S. Postal Service registered or 
    certified mail is the U.S. postmark both on the envelope or wrapper and 
    on the original receipt from the U.S. Postal Service. Both postmarks 
    must show a legible date or the proposal shall be processed as if 
    mailed late. ``Postmark'' means a printed, stamped, or otherwise placed 
    impression (exclusive of a postage meter machine impression) that is 
    readily identifiable without further action as having been supplied and 
    affixed by employees of the U.S. Postal Service on the date of mailing. 
    Therefore, applicants should request the postal clerk to place a 
    legible hand cancellation ``bull's eye'' postmark on both the receipt 
    and the envelope or wrapper.
        The only acceptable evidence to establish the date of mailing of a 
    late proposal sent by ``Express Mail Next Day Service--Post Office to 
    Addressee'' is the date entered by the post office receiving clerk on 
    the ``Express Mail Next Day Service--Post Office to Addressee'' label 
    and the postmark on both the envelope or wrapper and on the original 
    receipt from the U.S. Postal Service. ``Postmark'' has the same meaning 
    as defined above. Therefore, applicants should request the postal clerk 
    to place a legible hand cancellation ``bull's eye'' postmark on both 
    the receipt and the envelope or wrapper.
    
    E. Withdrawal of Proposals
    
        Proposals may be withdrawn by written notice or telegram (including 
    mailgram) received at any time before award. Proposals may be withdrawn 
    in person by an applicant or an authorized representative thereof, if 
    the representative's identity is made known and the representative 
    signs a receipt for the proposal before award.
    
    F. Period of Performance
    
        The period of performance will be fifteen (15) months from the date 
    of execution.
    
    G. Funding
    
        DOL has set aside up to $1.5 million to be disbursed, contingent 
    upon resources being available for this purpose. It is anticipated that 
    grant awards will be in the $250,000 to $300,000 range.
    
    H. Option to Extend
    
        Based on the availability of funds, effective program operation, 
    and the needs of the Department, the grant(s) may be extended for up to 
    one (1) additional year.
    
    I. Matching Requirement
    
        In order to receive a grant award, an applicant must include 
    matching non-Federal contributions in an amount equal to 100 percent of 
    Federal funds to be provided.
    
    Part III--Statement of Work
    
        The primary goal of this initiative is to assist economically 
    disadvantaged individuals in establishing and maintaining 
    microenterprises. Proposals must contain a clear statement of the need 
    for such a project, together with the identification of the proposed 
    service delivery strategy to accomplish the primary goal and to meet 
    this stated need. They should also enumerate sources of start-up 
    capital for new microenterprises, such as community-based credit 
    providers.
        Proposals should detail new methods and techniques for the States 
    to focus on the entrepreneurial training needs of disadvantaged 
    individuals. The Department is aware that most States already possess 
    some organizational capacity and staffing to assist generally in the 
    formation and development of small business activity, most notably 
    through the Small Business Development Centers described in the next 
    segment.
        An applicant should not attempt simply to add to this existing 
    State assistance. Rather, and applicant must demonstrate in its 
    proposal how the proposed training is necessary in assisting 
    economically disadvantaged individuals to establish and maintain 
    microenterprises.
    
    A. Activities
    
        The proposal should present a clear discussion of what activities 
    related to microenterprise and economic development are already 
    functioning within the State and how this new initiative will link 
    those activities and add a new dimension to them. Examples of such 
    activities include:
    
        (1) Empowerment Zones and Enterprise Communities as authorized 
    by Title XIII of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993. 
    Their mission is to provide favorable Federal income tax treatment 
    and other incentives to encourage the conduct of trades or 
    businesses and general economic development within designated areas.
        (2) Small Business Development Centers (SBDC) as authorized by 
    the Small Business Act of 1953 as amended. Their stated mission is 
    to provide management assistance to prospective and small business 
    owners through one-on-one counselling and specialized training 
    efforts.
        (3) Economic Development Districts (EDD) as authorized by the 
    Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965, as amended. EDDs 
    serve as the structural entities for formulating and implementing 
    economic development plans and activities within boundaries.
    
        These examples represent some of the types of existing activities 
    and resources that may be considered in developing a proposal under 
    this solicitation.
    
    B. Resources
    
        Applicants are strongly encouraged to be exhaustive in examining 
    available related resources and ongoing activities in order to maximize 
    the potential impact of a microenterprise. The resources that the State 
    will provide to meet the 100 percent matching requirement should be 
    discussed in some detail providing a clear understanding of what is to 
    be provided and what the relevance/linkage of these resources is to the 
    activities proposed and to successfully meeting the primary goal of the 
    project.
    
    C. Services and Techniques
    
        Applicants shall specify the services and techniques they propose 
    to provide to meet the goal of aiding economically disadvantaged 
    individuals with microenterprises. Examples of key services and 
    techniques that may be included in a proposal are:
    
        (1) Recruitment and screening. This is an important element both 
    in identifying program staff to be trained as trainers and in 
    identifying and selecting individuals who show potential for owning 
    an microenterprise.
        (2) Case management. This would involve assigning an individual 
    who provides guidance in all aspects of program participation and 
    other services to microenterprise owners.
        (3) Follow-up. Enrollment in and successful completion of a 
    microenterprise training program may well be only the initial 
    challenges facing the entrepreneur. A structured follow-up program 
    involving such counseling and supportive services as deemed 
    appropriate is a critical aspect of the program.
        (4) Mentoring. This could involve assigning a volunteer 
    businessperson from the community to serve in a one-on-one 
    relationship with the new entrepreneur. Such volunteer service may 
    not be considered for meeting the 100 percent matching requirement.
    
    Part IV--Evaluation Criteria
    
        Prospective applicants are advised that the selection of grantees 
    for award is to be made after careful evaluation of proposals by a 
    panel of specialists within DOL. The panelists will evaluate the 
    proposals in accordance with the elements set forth in the Statement of 
    Work. The panel results are advisory in nature and not binding on the 
    Grant Officer.
    
    A. Ability to Conduct and Monitor the Microenterprise Activities (45 
    Points)
    
        (1) The proposal must describe in specific terms the service 
    delivery strategy that the applicant would utilize to implement its 
    ideas. The applicant must clearly state, particularly when 
    discussing staff training for implementation of proposed 
    microenterprise activities, how this activity will create a new 
    capacity for the State to conduct such training. The proposal must 
    provide assurances that resources under this grant will not be used 
    to substitute for an ongoing commitment to maintain an economic 
    development capacity. (30 points)
        (2) The application must also contain a clear statement of the 
    need for such a project, including the degree to which the service 
    delivery strategy will assist in meeting that need. (15 points)
    
        This overall discussion will be the measure for determining the 
    ability to conduct and monitor such activities.
    
    B. Evidence of State Commitment, As Shown Through Existing or Proposed 
    Related Programs and Support (25 Points)
    
        This section must include a detailed discussion of the coordination 
    and linkages between programs and community organizations, as well as a 
    discussion of the organizational capacity which the State intends to 
    devote to this project. The emphasis under this criterion will be on 
    programmatic resources which might enhance the training aspects of a 
    project. As noted earlier, it is recognized that most applicants have 
    some form of economic development capacity already in place.
    
    C. Evidence of Linkage(s) to Private, Community-Based Credit and 
    Technical Assistance Providers (10 Points)
    
        Discussion of what financial resources are available to provide new 
    microenterprises with start-up capital, such as a consortium of banks 
    which have pledged to assist in this process.
    
    D. Size of Non-Federal Matching Fund Contributions (10 Points)
    
        In order to receive a grant award, an applicant, at a minimum, must 
    include matching non-Federal contributions in an amount equal to 100 
    percent of Federal funds to be provided. Applicants who propose to 
    provide the minimum amount for matching non-Federal contributions will 
    receive five (5) points under this criteria. If the non-Federal 
    contributions are greater than 100 percent of the Federal funds to be 
    provided, applicants may receive up to an additional five (5) points 
    under this criteria.
        The cost proposal must contain a detailed discussion of the size, 
    nature, and quality of the non-Federal match. Proposals not presenting 
    a detailed discussion of the non-Federal match or not meeting the 
    statutory requirement of a 100-percent match will be considered 
    nonresponsive.
    
    E. Cost (10 points)
    
        The cost effectiveness of the project as indicated by cost per 
    participant and cost per activity in relation to services provided and 
    outcomes anticipated.
        Offerors are advised that discussions may be necessary in order to 
    clarify any inconsistencies in their applications. The panel's 
    evaluations are only advisory to the Grant Officer. The final decisions 
    for grant award will be made by the ETA Grant Officer, after 
    considering the panelists' scoring decisions. The Grant Officer's 
    decisions will be based on what he or she determines is most 
    advantageous to the Federal Government.
    
    Part V--Reporting Requirements
    
        The Grantee is required to provide reports and documents listed 
    below:
    
    A. Quarterly Financial Reports
    
        The grantee shall submit to the Grant Officer's Technical 
    Representative (GOTR), within 30 days following the end of each 
    quarter, three (3) copies of a quarterly Financial Status Report (SF 
    269), until such time as all funds have been expended or the period of 
    availability has expired.
    
    B. Quarterly Progress Reports
    
        The grantee shall submit to the GOTR within 30 days following the 
    end of each quarter, three (3) copies of a quarterly progress report 
    which provides a detailed account of services provided during each 
    quarter of grant performance. Reports shall include the following in 
    brief narrative form:
    
        (1) A description of overall progress of work activities 
    accomplished during the reported period.
        (2) An indication of current problems, if any, which may delay 
    performance and any proposed corrective action.
        (3) Program status and financial data/information relative to 
    expenditure rate versus budget, anticipated staff changes, etc.
    
    C. Final Report
    
        Each grantee shall submit, for the initial grant period for which 
    funds are received, a final report that includes at a minimum a 
    description of:
    
        (1) The programs that have been established and developed with 
    such funds, including a description of the persons participating and 
    the microenterprise developed;
        (2) The quantitative and qualitative benefits of such programs;
        (3) The contributions of such programs to economic self-
    sufficiency and economic development;
        (4) The types of services provided and an assessment of how well 
    they worked in assisting participants to establish their own 
    microenterprises;
        (5) The characteristics of the individual participants served;
        (6) Measures of pre- and post-program income (e.g., wage rates, 
    business income, total income, etc.); and
        (7) The key lessons learned, including significant impediments, 
    barriers or other problems experienced, and the measures used to 
    address and/or overcome them.
    
        This final report is due in draft no later than 45 days prior to 
    the conclusion of the initial grant period. Three (3) copies of this 
    report shall be due no later than the conclusion of the grant period. 
    In the event the Government exercises its option to extend the grant, 
    the grantee shall submit the final report at the conclusion of the 
    option year.
    
        Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of April.
    Janice E. Perry,
    Grant Officer, Division of Acquisition and Assistance.
    
    Appendices
    
    A. SF-424, Application for Federal Assistance
    B. SF-424A, Budget
    
    BILLING CODE 4510-34-M
    
    TN13AP94.002
    
    
    TN13AP94.003
    
    
    [FR Doc. 94-8865 Filed 4-12-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4510-30-C
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/13/1994
Department:
Labor Department
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Notice of availability of funds and solicitation for grant application (SGA).
Document Number:
94-8865
Dates:
Application for grant wards will be accepted commencing April 13, 1994. The closing date for receipt of applications shall be June 13, 1994, at 2 p.m. (Eastern Time).
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: April 13, 1994, SGA No. DAA 94-006