98-9581. Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce, plc Viper Models Mk.521, and Mk.522 Turbojet Engines  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 70 (Monday, April 13, 1998)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 17972-17973]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-9581]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 98-ANE-01-AD]
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce, plc Viper Models Mk.521, 
    and Mk.522 Turbojet Engines
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes the adoption of a new airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to Rolls-Royce, plc (R-R) Viper 
    Models Mk.521, and Mk.522 series turbojet engines. This proposal would 
    require replacement of certain high pressure (HP) fuel pumps with an 
    improved design which is more tolerant of water contaminated, low 
    lubricity fuels. This proposal is prompted by reports of HP fuel pump 
    drive shaft failures resulting in inflight engine shutdowns and at 
    least two reported near dual engine events. These failures have been 
    attributed to the low lubricity properties of water contaminated fuel. 
    The actions specified by the proposed AD are intended to prevent HP 
    fuel pump failures, which can result in inflight engine shutdowns and 
    the possibility of dual engine events.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received by June 12, 1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), New England Region, Office of the Regional 
    Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 98-ANE-01-AD, 12 New England 
    Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299. Comments may also be 
    submitted to the Rules Docket by using the following Internet address: 
    9-ad-engineprop@faa.dot.gov''.
        Comments may be inspected at this location between 8:00 a.m. and 
    4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
        The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be 
    obtained from Rolls-Royce, plc, Technical Publications Department CLS-
    4, P.O. Box 3, Filton, Bristol, BS34 7QE England; telephone 117-979-
    1234, fax 117-979-7575. This information may be examined at the FAA, 
    New England Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 12 New England 
    Executive Park, Burlington, MA.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Lawrence, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 
    New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299; telephone (781) 
    238-7176, fax (781) 238-7199.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications should identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with 
    the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket Number 98-ANE-01-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, New England Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 98-ANE-01-AD, 12 New England Executive 
    Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299.
    
    Discussion
    
        The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), which is the airworthiness 
    authority for the United Kingdom (UK), recently notified the Federal 
    Aviation Administration (FAA) that an unsafe condition may exist on 
    Rolls-Royce, plc (R-R) Viper Models Mk.521, and Mk.522 series turbojet 
    engines. The CAA advises that they have received reports of 12 
    incidents of high pressure (HP) fuel pump failures, including two near 
    dual engine events, due to fuel pump drive shaft failure. Failures were 
    attributed to the low lubricity properties of water contaminated fuel. 
    This condition, if not corrected, could result in HP fuel pump 
    failures, which can result in inflight engine shutdowns and the 
    possibility of dual engine events.
        Rolls-Royce, plc has issued Service Bulletins (SBs) No. 73-A115 and 
    73-A118, both Revision 1, dated February 1996, that specify replacing 
    affected HP fuel pumps with improved pumps. The CAA classified these 
    SBs mandatory and issued ADs 003-02-96 and 004-02-96 in order to assure 
    the airworthiness of these engines in the UK.
        This engine model is manufactured in the UK and is type 
    certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of 
    Section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and 
    the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this 
    bilateral airworthiness agreement, the CAA has kept the FAA informed of 
    the situation described above. The FAA has examined the findings of the 
    CAA, reviewed all available information, and
    
    [[Page 17973]]
    
    determined that AD action is necessary for products of this type design 
    that are certificated for operation in the United States.
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop on other engines of the same type design registered in 
    the United States, the proposed AD would require replacement of certain 
    HP fuel pumps with improved pumps at the earliest of the following: 160 
    hours time in service (TIS) after the effective date of this AD, the 
    next shop visit after the effective date of this AD, or the next HP 
    fuel pump removal after the effective date of this AD. Compliance times 
    were determined in accordance with CAA recommendations and R-R risk 
    analysis. The actions would be required to be accomplished in 
    accordance with the SBs described previously.
        There are approximately 280 engines of the affected design in the 
    worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 104 engines installed on 
    aircraft of U.S. registry would be affected by this proposed AD, that 
    it would take approximately 4 work hours per engine to accomplish the 
    proposed actions, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. 
    Required parts would cost approximately $18,000 per engine. Based on 
    these figures, the total cost impact of the proposed AD on U.S. 
    operators is estimated to be $1,896,960.
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed 
    regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
    Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT 
    Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 
    and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact, 
    positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under 
    the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft 
    regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the 
    Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules 
    Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    Rolls-Royce plc: Docket No. 98-ANE-01-AD.
    
        Applicability: Rolls-Royce, plc (R-R) Viper Models Mk.521, and 
    Mk.522 turbojet engines, with high pressure (HP) fuel pumps, part 
    numbers (P/Ns) MGBB.167, MGBB.137, or MGBB.168, installed. These 
    engines are installed on but not limited to Raytheon (formerly 
    British Aerospace, Hawker Siddeley) Model DH.125 series aircraft.
    
        Note 1: This airworthiness directive (AD) applies to each engine 
    identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of 
    whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in the area 
    subject to the requirements of this AD. For engines that have been 
    modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the 
    requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request 
    approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with 
    paragraph (c) of this AD. The request should include an assessment 
    of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the 
    unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition 
    has not been eliminated, the request should include specific 
    proposed actions to address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent HP fuel pump failures, which can result in inflight 
    engine shutdowns and the possibility of dual engine events, 
    accomplish the following:
        (a) Remove from service affected HP fuel pumps, and replace with 
    serviceable, improved HP fuel pumps, at the earliest of the 
    following: 160 hours time in service (TIS) after the effective date 
    of this AD, the next shop visit after the effective date of this AD, 
    or the next HP fuel pump removal after the effective date of this 
    AD, as follows:
        (1) For HP fuel pumps installed on R-R Viper Mk.521 engines, 
    replace HP fuel pumps, P/N MGBB.167, with improved, serviceable fuel 
    pumps, P/N MGBB.182, in accordance with R-R SB No. 73-A118, Revision 
    1, dated February 1996.
        (2) For HP fuel pumps installed on R-R Viper Mk.522 engines, 
    replace HP fuel pumps, P/Ns MGBB.137 or MGBB.168, with improved, 
    serviceable fuel pumps, P/N MGBB.183, in accordance with R-R SB No. 
    73-A115, Revision 1, dated February 1996.
        (b) For the purpose of this AD, a shop visit is defined as the 
    induction of an engine into the shop for any reason.
        (c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Engine Certification Office. 
    Operators shall submit their request through an appropriate FAA 
    Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send 
    it to the Manager, Engine Certification Office.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this airworthiness directive, 
    if any, may be obtained from the Engine Certification Office.
    
        (d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the aircraft to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
    
        Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on April 2, 1998.
    Jay J. Pardee,
    Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 98-9581 Filed 4-10-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/13/1998
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
98-9581
Dates:
Comments must be received by June 12, 1998.
Pages:
17972-17973 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 98-ANE-01-AD
PDF File:
98-9581.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13