98-9602. Midcoast Interstate Transmission Inc.; Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Colbert County Loop Project and Request for Comments on Environmental Issues  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 70 (Monday, April 13, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 18001-18002]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-9602]
    
    
    
    [[Page 18001]]
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
    
    Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
    [Docket No. CP98-247-000]
    
    
    Midcoast Interstate Transmission Inc.; Notice of Intent To 
    Prepare an Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Colbert County 
    Loop Project and Request for Comments on Environmental Issues
    
    April 7, 1998.
        The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or 
    Commission) will prepare an environmental assessment (EA) that will 
    discuss the environmental impacts of the construction and operation of 
    the facilities, about 7.38 miles of 16-inch-diameter pipeline, proposed 
    in the Colbert County Loop Project.\1\ This EA will be used by the 
    Commission in its decision-making process to determine whether the 
    project is in the public convenience and necessity.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ Midcoast Interstate Transmission Inc.'s application was 
    filed with the Commission under Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act and 
    Part 157 of the Commission's regulations.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        If you are a landowner receiving this notice, you may be contacted 
    by a pipeline company representative about the acquisition of an 
    easement to construct, operate, and maintain the proposed facilities. 
    The pipeline company would seek to negotiate a mutually acceptable 
    agreement. However, if the project is approved by the Commission, that 
    approval conveys with it the right of eminent domain. Therefore, if 
    easement negotiations fail to produce an agreement, the pipeline 
    company could initiate condemnation proceedings in accordance with 
    state law. A fact sheet addressing a number of typically asked 
    questions, including the use of eminent domain, is attached to this 
    notice as appendix 1.\2\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \2\ The appendices referenced in this notice are not being 
    printed in the Federal Register. Copies are available from the 
    Commission's Public Reference and Files Maintenance Branch, 888 
    First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, or call (202) 208-1371. 
    Copies of the appendices were sent to all those receiving this 
    notice in the mail.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Summary of the Proposed Project
    
        Midcoast Interstate Transmission, Inc. (Midcoast) wants to expand 
    the capacity of its facilities in Colbert County, Alabama to transport 
    an additional 12,350 dekatherms per day (Dth/d) of natural gas to seven 
    local customers and to provide revised transportation service of 6,156 
    Dth/d to four existing customers. Midcoast seeks authority to construct 
    and operate 7.38 miles of 16-inch-diameter pipeline and related 
    facilities all in Colbert County, Alabama.
        The location of the project facilities is shown in appendix 2. If 
    you are interested in obtaining procedural information, please write to 
    the Secretary of the Commission.
    
    Land Requirements for Construction
    
        Construction of the proposed facilities would require about 50 
    acres of land, all of which is currently maintained by Midcoast as 
    permanent pipeline rights-of-way. Following construction, no new land 
    would be converted to permanent pipeline rights-of-way. All affected 
    land would be allowed to revert to its previous use.
    
    The EA Process
    
        The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires the 
    Commission to take into account the environmental impacts that could 
    result from an action whenever it considers the issuance of a 
    Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. NEPA also requires us 
    to discover and address concerns the public may have about proposals. 
    We call this ``scoping''. The main goal of the scoping process is to 
    focus the analysis in the EA on the important environmental issues. By 
    this Notice of Intent, the Commission requests public comments on the 
    scope of the issues it will address in the EA. All comments received 
    are considered during the preparation of the EA. State and local 
    government representatives are encouraged to notify their constituents 
    of this proposed action and encourage them to comment on their areas of 
    concern.
        The EA will discuss impacts that could occur as a result of the 
    construction and operation of the proposed project under these general 
    headings:
         Geology and soils.
         Water resources, fisheries, and wetlands.
         Vegetation and wildlife.
         Endangered and threatened species.
         Public safety.
         Land use.
         Cultural resources.
         Air quality and noise.
         Hazardous waste.
        We will also evaluate possible alternatives to the proposed project 
    or portions of the project, and make recommendations on how to lessen 
    or avoid impacts on the various resource areas.
        Our independent analysis of the issues will be in the EA. Depending 
    on the comments received during the scoping process, the EA may be 
    published and mailed to Federal, state, and local agencies, public 
    interest groups, interested individuals, affected landowners, 
    newspapers, libraries, and the Commission's official service list for 
    this proceeding. A comment period will be allotted for review if the EA 
    is published. We will consider all comments on the EA before we make 
    our recommendations to the Commission.
        To ensure your comments are considered, please carefully follow the 
    instructions in the public participation section below on this page.
    
    Currently Identified Environmental Issues
    
        We have already identified several issues that we think deserve 
    attention based on a preliminary review of the proposed facilities and 
    the environmental information provided by Midcoast. This preliminary 
    list of issues may be changed based on your comments and our analysis.
         Thirty residences would be located within 50 feet of the 
    construction work area, with 6 located within 25 feet of the 
    construction work area.
         The crossing of Little Bear Creek.
    
    Public Participation
    
        You can make a difference by providing us with your specific 
    comments or concerns about the project. By becoming a commentor, your 
    concerns will be addressed in the EA and considered by the Commission. 
    You should focus on the potential environmental effects of the 
    proposal, alternatives to the proposal (including alternative routes), 
    and measures to avoid or lessen environmental impact. The more specific 
    your comments, the more useful they will be. Please carefully follow 
    these instructions to ensure that your comments are received in time 
    and properly recorded:
         Send two copies of your letter to: David P. Boergers, 
    Acting Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., 
    N.E., Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426;
         Label one copy of the comments for the attention of the 
    Environmental Review and Compliance Branch, PR-11.2.
         Reference Docket No. CP98-247-000; and
         Mail your comments so that they will be received in 
    Washington, DC on or before May 8, 1998.
    
    Becoming an Intervenor
    
        In addition to involvement in the EA scoping process, you may want 
    to become an official party to the proceeding known as an 
    ``intervenor''. Intervenors play a more formal role in
    
    [[Page 18002]]
    
    the process. Among other things, intervenors have the right to receive 
    copies of case-related Commission documents and filings by other 
    intervenors. Likewise, each intervenor must provide 14 copies of its 
    filings to the Secretary of the Commission and must send a copy of its 
    filings to all other parties on the Commission's service list for this 
    proceeding. If you want to become an intervenor you must file a motion 
    to intervene according to Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
    Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214) (see appendix 3). Only 
    intervenors have the right to seek rehearing of the Commission's 
    decision.
        The date for filing timely motions to intervene in this proceeding 
    has passed. Therefore, parties now seeking to file late interventions 
    must show good cause, as required by Section 385.214(b)(3), why this 
    time limitation should be waived. Environmental issues have been viewed 
    as good cause for late intervention.
        You do not need intervenor status to have your environmental 
    comments considered. Additional information about the proposed project 
    is available from Mr. Paul McKee of the Commission's Office of External 
    Affairs at (202) 208-1088.
    Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
    Acting Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 98-9602 Filed 4-10-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/13/1998
Department:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-9602
Pages:
18001-18002 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. CP98-247-000
PDF File:
98-9602.pdf