05-7180. Flexibility for Delivery of Communications by Mobile Satellite Service Providers in the 2 GHz Band, the L-Band, and the 1.6/2.4 GHz Bands
-
Start Preamble
AGENCY:
Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY:
This document is a summary of the Memorandum Opinion and Order and Second Order on Reconsideration adopted by the Commission in this proceeding. The Commission reaffirmed its decision to allow satellite operators to integrate Ancillary Terrestrial Components (ATC) to existing Mobile Satellite Service (MSS) systems and amended the service rules governing ATC to provide greater flexibility for MSS operators to design and deploy ATC, while protecting other users in the bands. The new rules will further the Commission's goals of development and rapid deployment of new technologies, products, and services for the benefit of the public, including those residing in rural areas, and efficient and intensive use of the electromagnetic spectrum.
DATES:
Effective May 13, 2005.
Start Further InfoFOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sean O'More, Howard Griboff, or Paul Locke, Policy Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1460.
End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental InformationSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
This is a summary of the Commission's Memorandum Opinion and Order and Second Order on Reconsideration in IB Docket No. 01-185, FCC No. 05-30, adopted February 10, 2005 and released on February 25, 2005. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Reference Center (Room CY-A257). The document is also available for download over the Internet at http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-30A1.doc. The complete text may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) located in Room CY-B402, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. Customers may contact BCPI at their web site: http://www.bcpiweb.com or call 1-800-378-3160.
Summary of Memorandum Opinion and Order and Second Order on Reconsideration
On February 10, 2003, the Commission released a Report and Order (MSS Flexibility R&O) in this proceeding (68 FR 33640, June 5, 2003). The MSS Flexibility R&O permitted MSS operators to provide integrated ATC within their assigned MSS spectrum, and adopted rules pertaining to the licensing and operation of ATC systems. The Commission established a set of prerequisites, known as “gating criteria,” that MSS operators would have to satisfy in order to add ATC to their systems. The Commission also established technical rules to ensure that ATC did not interfere with other MSS operators' systems or with other services. Finally, the Commission concluded that ATC authority would be granted by modifying MSS operators' current licenses, and that ATC authority would not be granted by competitive bidding. On July 3, 2003, the Commission released an Order on Reconsideration (Sua Sponte Order) (68 FR 47856, August 12, 2003), which clarified certain aspects of the MSS Flexibility R&O.
On February 10, 2005, the Commission adopted the Memorandum Opinion and Order and Second Order on Reconsideration in this proceeding. The Memorandum Opinion and Order and Second Order on Reconsideration amends the licensing and service rules for ATC in the 2000-2020 and 2180-2200 MHz bands (the 2 GHz MSS band), the 1525-1559 MHz and 1626.5-1660.5 MHz bands (the L-band), and the 1610-1626.5 MHz and 2483.5-2500 MHz bands (the Big LEO band). MSS can provide mobile communications at any location in the United States, including rural and remote areas and offshore maritime areas where communications by terrestrial mobile systems are often unavailable. In some areas, however, particularly urban areas, the communications signal from the MSS satellite can be blocked by tall buildings. For this reason, there are areas where MSS communications are not available. ATC will provide integrated communications coverage in these areas, allowing MSS/ATC to offer ubiquitous service to consumers.
The Memorandum Opinion and Order and Second Order on Reconsideration responded to petitions for reconsideration of the MSS Flexibility R&O and Sua Sponte Order in four major areas: (1) Gating criteria, (2) uplink interference, (3) downlink interference, and (4) licensing rules.
Gating Criteria. The Memorandum Opinion and Order and Second Order on Reconsideration considered requests to change the gating criteria which MSS operators must meet in order to provide ATC. The Commission declined to require that a percentage of MSS/ATC system capacity must be reserved for MSS operations. The Commission also declined to require MSS/ATC user terminals, such as handsets, to attempt to contact the satellite before communicating through the ATC. The Commission also clarified the meaning of the term “dual-mode device,” the prohibition on offering ATC-only service, and the requirement that an MSS operator must satisfy the gating criteria in each band in which it seeks to offer ATC.
Uplink Interference. The Memorandum Opinion and Order and Second Order on Reconsideration Start Printed Page 19317changes the basis of the uplink interference rules in the L-band. Previously, the technical rules designed to limit uplink interference to the MSS/ATC operator's own satellite and the satellites of other MSS operators were a detailed set of restrictions on ATC base stations and handsets. The Commission reconsidered these rules, and replaced them with limits on the overall amount of interference an MSS/ATC system, as a whole, may cause to other MSS systems in the L-band.
Downlink Interference. The Memorandum Opinion and Order and Second Order on Reconsideration increased the maximum power of ATC base stations in the L-band. The power limits on ATC base stations in the MSS Flexibility R&O were based on an assumed MSS user terminal receiver tolerance level for interference of -60 dBm. The Commission staff tested representative MSS user terminals and determined that the correct tolerance level for interference of these terminals is -52 dBm. This justifies an 8 dB increase in the maximum power of ATC base stations, and in the power flux density (PFD) that ATC base stations may produce near airports and waterways. In order to provide extra interference protection for the 1544-1545 MHz sub-band, which is used for distress and safety communications, the Commission retained the former ATC base station power limits in the 1541.5-1547.5 MHz sub-band, based on measurements that demonstrate lower MSS terminal tolerance for interference from interfering signals close to the desired signal. The Commission also required MSS/ATC operators to coordinate with other MSS operators when there was a likelihood that third-order intermodulation from ATC base stations could cause harmful interference to MSS terminals. In addition, the Commission noted that grant of future ATC applications will be coordinated with the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, pursuant to the general notification process, to assure adequate protection of the Radionavigation Satellite Service (RNSS) signals in the 1559-1610 MHz band.
Licensing Rules. The Memorandum Opinion and Order and Second Order on Reconsideration reconsidered the licensing rules for ATC, and amended the rules to allow non-operational MSS operators to demonstrate that they would soon meet the gating criteria. Upon a substantial showing, the Commission will grant ATC authorization to these non-operations MSS operators so they may begin ATC operations at the same time they begin MSS operations. The Commission also reconsidered and reaffirmed its decision that ATC authority is not eligible for assignment by competitive bidding.
Procedural Matters
Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis
The Memorandum Opinion and Order and Second Order on Reconsideration does not contain information collections subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public Law No. 104-13. It also, therefore, does not contain any new or modified “information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees,” pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law No. 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4).
Final Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended (RFA), requires that a regulatory flexibility analysis be prepared for notice-and-comment rule making proceedings, unless the agency certifies that “the rule will not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.” (See 5 U.S.C. 601-612; the RFA has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Public Law 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996)). The RFA generally defines the term “small entity” as having the same meaning as the terms “small business,” “small organization,” and “small governmental jurisdiction.” In addition, the term “small business” has the same meaning as the term “small business concern” under the Small Business Act. (See 5 U.S.C. 601(3), incorporating by reference the definition of “small-business concern” in the Small Business Act, (15 U.S.C. 632)). Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 601(3), the statutory definition of a small business applies “unless an agency, after consultation with the Office of Advocacy of the Small Business Administration and after opportunity for public comment, establishes one or more definitions of such term which are appropriate to the activities of the agency and publishes such definition(s) in the Federal Register.” A “small business concern” is one which: (1) is independently owned and operated; (2) is not dominant in its field of operation; and (3) satisfies any additional criteria established by the Small Business Administration (SBA).
As required by the RFA, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) was incorporated in the MSS Flexibility Notice, (68 FR 33666, June 5, 2003) and no parties responded to the IRFA. After a review of the policies and rules adopted in the MSS Flexibility R&O, the Commission determined that there would be no significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Thus, a Final Regulatory Flexibility Certification was included in the MSS Flexibility R&O.
In addressing the issues raised by the parties seeking reconsideration of the MSS Flexibility R&O, no parties commented on the regulatory flexibility certification. We certify that the policies and rules adopted in the Memorandum Opinion and Order and Second Order on Reconsideration will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.
We are incorporating the Final Regulatory Analysis Certification contained in the MSS Flexibility R&O into this proceeding. In our reconsideration of the petitions in this proceeding, we modify our rules that permit the addition of ATC to MSS systems. We change certain technical standards for ATC in the L-band, in order to permit MSS/ATC licenses flexibility in designing and operating their ATC while at the same time preventing harmful interference from ATC to co-primary MSS licensees in the L-band. In addition, we will allow certain increases in ATC base station power. We also modify the rules for authorizing MSS operators to add ATC to their networks. We expect that these changes will facilitate the development of MSS/ATC. We believe that all entities, both large and small, will have the flexibility to design their systems to meet their customers' needs. The policies and rules adopted in this proceeding are essentially technical changes that will provide equal opportunity for operational and non-operational MSS systems to add ATC without undue delay.
We believe that the policies and rules adopted in this proceeding—which bring additional flexibility to existing MSS licensees—will not affect a substantial number of small entities. There are currently five 2 GHz MSS licensees, two Big LEO MSS licensees and three L-band MSS licensees authorized to provide service in the United States. Although at least one of the 2 GHz MSS system licensees and one of the Big LEO licensees are small businesses, small businesses often do not have the financial ability to become MSS system operators because of the high implementation costs associated with satellite systems and services. We expect that, by the time of MSS ATC system implementation, these current Start Printed Page 19318small businesses will no longer be considered small due to the capital requirements for launching and operating a proposed system.
Therefore, we certify that the requirements of the Memorandum Opinion and Order and Second Order on Reconsideration will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The Commission will send a copy of the Memorandum Opinion and Order and Second Order on Reconsideration, including a copy of this Final Regulatory Flexibility Certification, in a report to Congress pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A)).
Ordering Clauses
Pursuant to sections 4(i), 7, 302, 303(c), 303(e), 303(f) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 157, 302, 303(c), 303(e), 303(f) and 303(r), this Memorandum Opinion and Order and Second Order on Reconsideration is adopted and that part 25 of the Commission's rules is amended, as specified in the Final rule, effective May 13, 2005.
The Petitions for Reconsideration of the MSS Flexibility R&O filed by Cingular Wireless LLC, the Society of Broadcast Engineers, Inc., and Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association are granted in part and denied in part.
The Petitions for Reconsideration of the MSS Flexibility R&O filed by Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC and Inmarsat Ventures PLC are granted in part, dismissed as moot in parte, and denied in part.
The Petition for Reconsideration of the MSS Flexibility R&O filed by the Boeing Co. is granted in part and denied in part.
The Petition for Reconsideration of the Sua Sponte Order filed by the Boeing Co. is granted in part and denied in part.
The Final Regulatory Flexibility Certification, as required by section 604 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, is adopted.
The Commission's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center, shall send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order and Second Order on Reconsideration, including the Final Regulatory Flexibility Certification, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration.
Start List of SubjectsList of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 25
- Radio
- Satellites
- Telecommunications
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
Final Rule
Start Amendment PartFor the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Communications Commission amends 47 CFR Part 25 as follows:
End Amendment Part Start PartPART 25—SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS
End Part Start Amendment Part1. The authority citation for part 25 continues to read as follows:
End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part2. Section 25.149 is amended by adding a note to paragraph (a)(1) and by revising paragraph (b)(1)(i) to read as follows:
End Amendment PartApplication requirements for ancillary terrestrial components in the mobile-satellite service networks operating in the 1.5/1.6 GHz, 1.6/2.4 GHz and 2 GHz mobile-satellite service.(a) * * *
(1) * * *
Note to paragraph (a)(1):
An L-band MSS licensee is permitted to apply for ATC authorization based on a non-forward-band mode of operation provided it is able to demonstrate that the use of a non-forward-band mode of operation would produce no greater potential interference than that produced as a result of implementing the rules of this section.
* * * * *(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) For the 2 GHz MSS band, an applicant must demonstrate that it can provide space-segment service covering all 50 states, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands one-hundred percent of the time, unless it is not technically possible, consistent with the coverage requirements for 2 GHz MSS GSO operators.
* * * * *3. Section 25.201 is amended by revising the definition of “Ancillary terrestrial component” to read as follows:
End Amendment PartDefinitions.* * * * *Ancillary terrestrial component. The term “ancillary terrestrial component” means a terrestrial communications network used in conjunction with a qualifying satellite network system authorized pursuant to these rules and the conditions established in the Orders issued in IB Docket No. 01-185, Flexibility for Delivery of Communications by Mobile Satellite Service Providers in the 2 GHz Band, the L-Band, and the 1.6/2.4 GHz Band.
* * * * *4. Section 25.216 is amended by revising paragraph (i) to read as follows:
End Amendment PartLimits on emissions from mobile earth stations for protection of aeronautical radionavigation-satellite service.* * * * *(i) The e.i.r.p density of carrier-off state emissions from mobile earth stations manufactured more than six months after Federal Register publication of the rule changes adopted in FCC 03-283 with assigned uplink frequencies between 1 and 3 GHz shall not exceed -80 dBW/MHz in the 1559-1610 MHz band averaged over any two millisecond interval.
* * * * *5. Section 25.252 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(7) and (b)(3) to read as follows:
End Amendment PartSpecial requirements for ancillary terrestrial components operating in the 2000-2020 MHz/2180-2200 MHz bands.(a) * * *
(7) Generate EIRP density, averaged over any two millisecond active transmission interval, greater than -70 dBW/MHz in the 1559-1610 MHz band. The EIRP, measured over any two millisecond active transmission interval, of discrete out-of-band emissions of less than 700 Hz bandwidth from such base stations, shall not exceed -80 dBW in the 1559-1610 MHz band. A root-mean-square detector function with a resolution bandwidth of one megahertz or equivalent and no less video bandwidth shall be used to measure wideband EIRP density for purposes of this rule, and narrowband EIRP shall be measured with a root-mean-square detector function with a resolution bandwidth of one kilohertz or equivalent.
* * * * *(b) * * *
(3) Not generate EIRP density, averaged over any two-millisecond active transmission interval, greater than -70 dBW/MHz in the 1559-1610 MHz band. The EIRP, measured over any two-millisecond active transmission interval, of discrete out-of-band emissions of less than 700 Hz bandwidth from such mobile terminals shall not exceed -80 dBW in the 1559-1610 MHz band. The EIRP density of carrier-off-state emissions from such mobile terminals shall not exceed -80 dBW/MHz in the 1559-1610 MHz band, averaged over a two-millisecond interval. A root-mean-square detector Start Printed Page 19319function with a resolution bandwidth of one megahertz or equivalent and no less video bandwidth shall be used to measure wideband EIRP density for purposes of this rule, and narrowband EIRP shall be measured with a root-mean-square detector function with a resolution bandwidth of one kilohertz or equivalent.
* * * * *6. Section 25.253 is revised to read as follows:
End Amendment PartSpecial requirements for ancillary terrestrial components operating in the 1626.5-1660.5 MHz/1525-1559 MHz bands.(a) An ancillary terrestrial component in these bands shall:
(1) In any band segment coordinated for the exclusive use of an MSS applicant within the land area of the U.S., where there is no other L-Band MSS satellite making use of that band segment within the visible portion of the geostationary arc as seen from the ATC coverage area, the ATC system will be limited by the in-band and out-of-band emission limitations contained in this section and the requirement to maintain a substantial MSS service.
(2) In any band segment that is coordinated for the shared use of the applicant's MSS system and another MSS operator, where the coordination agreement existed prior to February 10, 2005 and permits a level of interference to the other MSS system of less than 6% ΔT/T, the applicant's combined ATC and MSS operations shall increase the system noise level of the other MSS to no more then 6% ΔT/T. Any future coordination agreement between the parties governing ATC operation will supersede this paragraph.
(3) In any band segment that is coordinated for the shared use of the applicant's MSS system and another MSS operator, where a coordination agreement existed prior to February 10, 2005 and permits a level of interference to the other MSS system of 6% ΔT/T or greater, the applicant's ATC operations may increase the system noise level of the other MSS system by no more than an additional 1% ΔT/T. Any future coordination agreement between the parties governing ATC operations will supersede this paragraph.
(4) In a band segment in which the applicant has no rights under a coordination agreement, the applicant may not implement ATC in that band.
(b) ATC base stations shall not exceed an out-of-channel emissions measurement of -57.9 dBW/MHz at the edge of a MSS licensee's authorized and internationally coordinated MSS frequency assignment.
(c) An applicant for an ancillary terrestrial component in these bands shall:
(1) Demonstrate, at the time of application, how its ATC network will comply with the requirements of footnotes US308 and US315 to the table of frequency allocations contained in § 2.106 of this chapter regarding priority and preemptive access to the L-band MSS spectrum by the aeronautical mobile-satellite en-route service (AMS(R)S) and the global maritime distress and safety system (GMDSS).
(2) Coordinate with the terrestrial CMRS operators prior to initiating ATC transmissions when co-locating ATC base stations with terrestrial commercial mobile radio service (CMRS) base stations that make use of Global Positioning System (GPS) time-based receivers.
(3) Provide, at the time of application, calculations that demonstrate the ATC system conforms to the ΔT/T requirements in paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(3) of this section, if a coordination agreement that incorporates the ATC operations does not exist with other MSS operators.
(d) Applicants for an ancillary terrestrial component in these bands must demonstrate that ATC base stations shall not:
(1) Exceed a peak EIRP of 31.9-10*log (number of carriers) dBW/200kHz, per sector, for each carrier in the 1525-1541.5 MHz and 1547.5-1559 MHz frequency bands;
(2) Exceed an EIRP in any direction toward the physical horizon (not to include man-made structures) of 26.9-10*log (number of carriers) dBW/200 kHz, per sector, for each carrier in the 1525-1541.5 MHz and 1547.5-1559 MHz frequency bands;
(3) Exceed a peak EIRP of 23.9 −10*log(number of carriers) dBW/200 kHz, per sector, for each carrier in the 1541.5-1547.5 MHz frequency band;
(4) Exceed an EIRP toward the physical horizon (not to include man-made structures) of 18.9—10*log(number of carriers) dBW/200 kHz, per sector, for each carrier in the 1541.5-1547.5 MHz frequency band;
(5) Exceed a total power flux density level of −56.8 dBW/m2/200 kHz at the edge of all airport runways and aircraft stand areas, including takeoff and landing paths from all carriers operating in the 1525-1559 MHz frequency bands. The total power flux density here is the sum of all power flux density values associated with all carriers in a sector in the 1525-1559 MHz frequency band, expressed in dB(Watts/m2/200 kHz). Free-space loss must be assumed if this requirement is demonstrated via calculation;
(6) Exceed a total power flux density level of −56.6 dBW/ m2/200 kHz at the water's edge of any navigable waterway from all carriers operating in the 1525-1541.5 MHz and 1547.5-1559 MHz frequency bands. The total power flux density here is the sum of all power flux density values associated with all carriers in a sector in the 1525-1541.5 MHz and 1547.5-1559 MHz frequency bands, expressed in dB(Watts/m2/200 kHz). Free-space loss must be assumed if this requirement is demonstrated via calculation;
(7) Exceed a total power flux density level of −64.6 dBW/ m2/200 kHz at the water's edge of any navigable waterway from all carriers operating in the 1541.5-1547.5 MHz frequency band. The total power flux density here is the sum of all power flux density values associated with all carriers in a sector in the 1541.5-1547.5 MHz frequency band, expressed in dB(Watts/m2/200 kHz). Free-space loss must be assumed if this requirement is demonstrated via calculation;
(8) Exceed a peak antenna gain of 16 dBi;
(9) Generate EIRP density, averaged over any two-millisecond active transmission interval, greater than −70 dBW/MHz in the 1559-1605 MHz band or greater than a level determined by linear interpolation in the 1605-1610 MHz band, from −70 dBW/MHz at 1605 MHz to −46 dBW/MHz at 1610 MHz. The EIRP, averaged over any two-millisecond active transmission interval, of discrete out-of-band emissions of less than 700 Hz bandwidth from such base stations shall not exceed −80 dBW in the 1559-1605 MHz band or exceed a level determined by linear interpolation in the 1605-1610 MHz band, from −80 dBW at 1605 MHz to −56 dBW at 1610 MHz. A root-mean-square detector function with a resolution bandwidth of one megahertz or equivalent and no less video bandwidth shall be used to measure wideband EIRP density for purposes of this rule, and narrowband EIRP shall be measured with a root-mean-square detector function with a resolution bandwidth of one kilohertz or equivalent.
(e) Applicants for an ancillary terrestrial component in these bands must demonstrate, at the time of the application, that ATC base stations shall use left-hand-circular polarization antennas with a maximum gain of 16 dBi and overhead gain suppression according to the following: Start Printed Page 19320
Angle from direction of maximum gain, in vertical plane, above antenna (degrees) Antenna discrimination pattern (dB) 0 Gmax 5 Not to Exceed Gmax −5 10 Not to Exceed Gmax −19 15 to 55 Not to Exceed Gmax −27 55 to 145 Not to Exceed Gmax −30 145 to 180 Not to Exceed Gmax −26 Where: Gmax is the maximum gain of the base station antenna in dBi.
(f) Prior to operation, ancillary terrestrial component licensees shall:
(1) Provide the Commission with sufficient information to complete coordination of ATC base stations with Search-and-Rescue Satellite-Aided Tracking (SARSAT) earth stations operating in the 1544-1545 MHz band for any ATC base station located either within 27 km of a SARSAT station, or within radio horizon of the SARSAT station, whichever is less.
(2) Take all practicable steps to avoid locating ATC base stations within radio line of sight of Mobile Aeronautical Telemetry (MAT) receive sites in order to protect U.S. MAT systems consistent with ITU-R Recommendation ITU-R M.1459. MSS ATC base stations located within radio line of sight of a MAT receiver must be coordinated with the Aerospace and Flight Test Radio Coordinating Council (AFTRCC) for non-Government MAT receivers on a case-by-case basis prior to operation. For government MAT receivers, the MSS licensee shall supply sufficient information to the Commission to allow coordination to take place. A listing of current and planned MAT receiver sites can be obtained from AFTRCC for non-Government sites and through the FCC's IRAC Liaison for Government MAT receiver sites.
(g) ATC mobile terminals shall:
(1) Be limited to a peak EIRP level of 0 dBW and an out-of-channel emissions of −67 dBW/4 kHz at the edge of an MSS licensee's authorized and internationally coordinated MSS frequency assignment.
(2) Be operated in a fashion that takes all practicable steps to avoid causing interference to U.S. radio astronomy service (RAS) observations in the 1660-1660.5 MHz band.
(3) Not generate EIRP density, averaged over any two-millisecond active transmission interval, greater than −70 dBW/MHz in the 1559-1605 MHz band or greater than a level determined by linear interpolation in the 1605-1610 MHz band, from −70 dBW/MHz at 1605 MHz to −46 dBW/MHz at 1610 MHz. The EIRP, averaged over any two-millisecond active transmission interval, of discrete out-of-band emissions of less than 700 Hz bandwidth from such mobile terminals shall not exceed −80 dBW in the 1559-1605 MHz band or exceed a level determined by linear interpolation in the 1605-1610 MHz band, from −80 dBW at 1605 MHz to −56 dBW at 1610 MHz. The EIRP density of carrier-off-state emissions from such mobile terminals shall not exceed −80 dBW/MHz in the 1559-1610 MHz band, averaged over a two-millisecond interval. A root-mean-square detector function with a resolution bandwidth of one megahertz or equivalent and no less video bandwidth shall be used to measure wideband EIRP density for purposes of this rule, and narrowband EIRP shall be measured with a root-mean-square detector function with a resolution bandwidth of one kilohertz or equivalent.
(h) When implementing multiple base stations and/or base stations using multiple carriers, where any third-order intermodulation product of these base stations falls on an L-band MSS band coordinated for use by another MSS operator with rights to the coordinated band, the MSS ATC licensee must notify the MSS operator. The MSS operator may request coordination to modify the base station carrier frequencies, or to reduce the maximum base station EIRP on the frequencies contributing to the third-order intermodulation products. The threshold for this notification and coordination is when the sum of the calculated signal levels received by an MSS receiver exceeds −70 dBm. The MSS receiver used in these calculations can be assumed to have an antenna with 0 dBi gain. Free-space propagation between the base station antennas and the MSS terminals can be assumed and actual signal polarizations for the ATC signals and the MSS system may be used.
7. Section 25.254 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(4) and (b)(4) as follows:
End Amendment PartSpecial requirements for ancillary terrestrial components operating in the 1610-1626.5 MHz/2483.5-2500 MHz bands.(a) * * *
(4) Base stations operating in frequencies above 2483.5 MHz shall not generate EIRP density, averaged over any two-millisecond active transmission interval, greater than −70 dBW/MHz in the 1559-1610 MHz band. The EIRP, averaged over any two-millisecond active transmission interval, of discrete out-of-band emissions of less than 700 Hz bandwidth from such base stations shall not exceed −80 dBW in the 1559-1610 MHz band. A root-mean-square detector function with a resolution bandwidth of one megahertz or equivalent and no less video bandwidth shall be used to measure wideband EIRP density for purposes of this rule, and narrowband EIRP shall be measured with a root-mean-square detector function with a resolution bandwidth of one kilohertz or equivalent.
* * * * *(b) * * *
(4) ATC mobile terminals operating in assigned frequencies in the 1610-1626.5 MHz band shall not generate EIRP density, averaged over any two-millisecond active transmission interval, greater than -70 dBW/MHz in the 1559-1605 MHz band or greater than a level determined by linear interpolation in the 1605-1610 MHz band, from −70 dBW/MHz at 1605 MHz to −10 dBW/MHz at 1610 MHz. The EIRP, averaged over any two-millisecond active transmission interval, of discrete out-of-band emissions of less than 700 Hz bandwidth from such mobile terminals shall not exceed −80 dBW in the 1559-1605 MHz band or exceed a level determined by linear interpolation in the 1605-1610 MHz band, from −80 dBW at 1605 MHz to −20 dBW at 1610 MHz. The EIRP density of carrier-off-state emissions from such mobile terminals shall not exceed −80 dBW/MHz in the 1559-1610 MHz band, averaged over a two-millisecond interval. A root-mean-square detector function with a resolution bandwidth of one megahertz or equivalent and no less video bandwidth shall be used to measure wideband EIRP density for purposes of this rule, and narrowband EIRP shall be measured with a root-mean-square detector function with a Start Printed Page 19321resolution bandwidth of one kilohertz or equivalent.
* * * * *[FR Doc. 05-7180 Filed 4-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Document Information
- Effective Date:
- 5/13/2005
- Published:
- 04/13/2005
- Department:
- Federal Communications Commission
- Entry Type:
- Rule
- Action:
- Final rule.
- Document Number:
- 05-7180
- Dates:
- Effective May 13, 2005.
- Pages:
- 19316-19321 (6 pages)
- Docket Numbers:
- IB Docket No. 01-185, FCC 05-30
- Topics:
- Radio, Satellites, Telecommunications
- PDF File:
- 05-7180.pdf
- CFR: (6)
- 47 CFR 25.149
- 47 CFR 25.201
- 47 CFR 25.216
- 47 CFR 25.252
- 47 CFR 25.253
- More ...