94-9162. Receipt of Application for Emergency Exemption to use Imidacloprid; Solicitation of Public Comment  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 73 (Friday, April 15, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-9162]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: April 15, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    [OPP-180934; FRL 4774-4]
    
     
    
    Receipt of Application for Emergency Exemption to use 
    Imidacloprid; Solicitation of Public Comment
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: EPA has received a specific exemption request from the 
    California Environmental Protection Agency (hereafter referred to as 
    the ``Applicant'') to use the pesticide imidacloprid (CAS 105827-78-9) 
    to treat up to 2,000 acres of tomatoes to control the sweet potato 
    whitefly (Bemesia tabaci), and the greenhouse whitefly (Trialeurodes 
    vaporariorum). The Applicant proposes the first food use of an active 
    ingredient; therefore, in accordance with 40 CFR 166.24, EPA is 
    soliciting public comment before making the decision whether or not to 
    grant the exemption.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 2, 1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: Three copies of written comments, bearing the identification 
    notation ``OPP-180934,'' should be submitted by mail to: Public 
    Response and Program Resource Branch, Field Operations Division 
    (7506C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 
    401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. In person, bring comments to: Rm. 
    1132, Crystal Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA.
        Information submitted in any comment concerning this notice may be 
    claimed confidential by marking any part or all of that information as 
    ``Confidential Business Information.'' Information so marked will not 
    be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR 
    part 2. A copy of the comment that does not contain Confidential 
    Business Information must be provided by the submitter for inclusion in 
    the public record. Information not marked confidential may be disclosed 
    publicly by EPA without prior notice. All written comments filed 
    pursuant to this notice will be available for public inspection in Rm. 
    1132, Crystal Mall No. 2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA, 
    from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except legal holidays.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Andrea Beard, Registration 
    Division (7505W), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental 
    Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW, Washington, DC 20460. Office location 
    and telephone number: Floor 6, Crystal Station #1, 2800 Jefferson Davis 
    Highway, Arlington, VA, (703) 308-8791.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 18 of the Federal 
    Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) (7 U.S.C. 136p), 
    the Administrator may, at her discretion, exempt a state agency from 
    any registration provision of FIFRA if she determines that emergency 
    conditions exist which require such exemption. The Applicant has 
    requested the Administrator to issue a specific exemption for the use 
    of imidacloprid on tomatoes to control the sweet potato whitefly and 
    the greenhouse whitefly. Information in accordance with 40 CFR part 166 
    was submitted as part of this request. Whiteflies have been a problem 
    in the ``desert-cropping systems'' in California and Arizona for some 
    time, but in 1990, a new strain was discovered, which appears to be 
    much more prolific than the standard strain, and resistant to many 
    insecticides. Whiteflies are common on many wild and cultivated crops 
    such as tomatoes, cotton, cucurbits and solanaceae. The Applicant 
    states that this new strain caused devastation to many crops in 1991 in 
    California's Imperial Valley, with crop losses over $120 million. 
    Whiteflies cause direct damage to the tomato plant through feeding 
    activities and the production of honeydew which enhances sooty mold 
    development.
        Whiteflies are also considered responsible for the introduction and 
    distribution of at least one geminivirus (which can lead to extreme 
    yield losses), and also cause a physiological disorder resulting in 
    irregular ripening of fruit. The Applicant claims that adequate control 
    of these pests are not being achieved with the currently registered 
    compounds. The Applicant claims that without control of this pest, 
    growers could expect up to 30-40 percent yield losses, making it 
    economically unfeasible to grow tomatoes. The Applicant estimates that 
    losses could average over $1,300 per acre.
        The Applicant proposes to apply imidacloprid at a maximum rate of 
    0.375 lb. (dry) active ingredient (24 fluid oz. of product) per acre 
    with a maximum of one application per crop season on a maximum of 2,000 
    acres of tomatoes. It is possible to produce two tomato crops per 
    calendar year on a given acre, and therefore, the acreage could 
    potentially receive two applications of imidacloprid per calendar year. 
    However, the Applicant proposes that no more than 0.5 lb. a.i. (32 fl. 
    oz. product) be applied per acre per calendar year. Therefore, use 
    under this exemption could potentially amount to a maximum total of 
    1,000 lbs. of active ingredient, or 500 gal. of product. This is the 
    first time that the Applicant has applied for the use of imidacloprid 
    on tomatoes. However, the Applicant requested, and was granted, 
    specific exemptions for the use of fenpropathrin in 1993, and 
    bifenthrin in 1992 and 1991, for whitefly control in tomatoes.
        This notice does not constitute a decision by EPA on the 
    application itself. The regulations governing section 18 require 
    publication of a notice of receipt in the Federal Register and solicit 
    public comment on an application for a specific exemption proposing the 
    first food use of an active ingredient. Accordingly, interested persons 
    may submit written views on this subject to the Field Operations 
    Division at the address above.
        The Agency, accordingly, will review and consider all comments 
    received during the comment period in determining whether to issue the 
    emergency exemption requested by the California Environmental 
    Protection Agency.
    
    List of Subjects
    
        Environmental protection, Pesticides and pests, Crisis exemptions.
    
        Dated: April 7, 1994.
    
    Stephen L. Johnson,
    Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
    
    [FR Doc. 94-9162 Filed 4-14-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/15/1994
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
94-9162
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before May 2, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: April 15, 1994, OPP-180934, FRL 4774-4