98-9969. Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 72 (Wednesday, April 15, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 18439-18440]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-9969]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
    
    Minerals Management Service
    
    
    Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; 
    Comment Request
    
    AGENCY: Minerals Management Service (MMS), Interior.
    
    ACTION: Notice of a new information collection.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and 
    respondent burden, MMS invites the public and other Federal agencies to 
    comment on a proposal to request approval of the new collection of 
    information discussed below. The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) 
    provides that an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
    required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
    a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number.
    
    DATES: Submit written comments by June 15, 1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to the Rules Processing Team, 
    Minerals Management Service, Mail Stop 4024, 381 Elden Street, Herndon, 
    Virginia 20170-4817.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alexis London, Rules Processing Team, 
    telephone (703) 787-1600. You may contact Alexis London to obtain a 
    copy of the proposed collection of information at no cost.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
        Title: Survey--Testing and Calibrating the Measurement of Nonmarket 
    Values for Natural Resources via the Contingent Valuation Methods.
        Abstract: The Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Lands Act, as amended, 
    directs the Secretary of the Interior to prepare a ``5-Year Program'' 
    that specifies the schedule of offshore natural gas and oil lease sales 
    for the 5-year period covered by the document. The MMS prepares the 5-
    Year Program for the Secretary. The key analytical support for the 
    Secretary's decision is a cost-benefit analysis of all size, timing, 
    and location alternatives for all lease sales being considered. The 
    MMS's 5-year cost-benefit analysis is an almost complete accounting of 
    all the costs and benefits attributable to the offshore natural gas and 
    oil leasing and development process. However, the cost-benefit
    
    [[Page 18440]]
    
    analysis has one major exclusion. MMS does not account fully for the 
    existence values (also called passive enjoyment values) of resources 
    that might be damaged or lost through offshore activities. Existence 
    values include the values people might place on a resource just by 
    knowing it exists, or by having the option of using it at some future 
    date, or by being able to bequeath it to future generations.
        The only way currently available to measure existence values is 
    through the use of the contingent valuation method (CVA). CVA consists 
    of carefully constructed questionnaires which are used in interviews 
    that elicit from people their estimate of what they would be willing to 
    pay to avoid the loss or damage. The MMS has two major reasons why it 
    has not funded CVA studies to provide estimates of existence values to 
    complete its cost-benefit analysis: First, the methodology for CVA 
    studies is still somewhat controversial in the economics profession. 
    Second, CVA studies for a program covering as vast an array of 
    environmental resources across the entire outer continental shelf would 
    be prohibitively expensive.
        The work proposed here is part of a research plan designed to come 
    to grips with both of these problems. This project focuses on improving 
    the methodology of CVA and its acceptance by the economics profession. 
    A follow-on project would build on the results of this project to test 
    a less expensive way of gathering estimates of peoples' willingness to 
    pay for environmental resource protection. This new approach is 
    expected to cut the cost of CVA studies to one-third the present cost. 
    With these improvements, MMS should be able to complete its 5-year 
    cost-benefit analysis using methodology acceptable to a majority of the 
    economics profession.
        Frequency: This is a one-time voluntary survey.
        Estimated number and description of respondents and reporting and 
    recordkeeping ``hour'' burden: Approximately 1,200 American adults will 
    be asked four questions, averaging about 4 minutes per respondent.
        Estimated reporting and recordkeeping ``cost'' burden: The PRA 
    requires agencies to estimate the total annual cost burden to 
    respondents as a direct result of this collection of information. This 
    is a one-time survey. There are no questions asked which would require 
    review of such detailed records as capital or operating expenditures of 
    businesses or individuals. There is no cost burden on the respondents 
    associated with this collection of information.
        Comments: The MMS will summarize written responses to this notice 
    and address them in its submission for OMB approval. All comments will 
    become a matter of public record. In calculating the burden, MMS has 
    assumed that information requested from respondents will not require 
    the reviewing of detailed records. Questions have been designed to 
    elicit information which would reasonably be recalled by respondents or 
    quickly estimated. The MMS specifically solicits comments on the 
    following questions:
        (a) Is the proposed collection of information necessary for the 
    proper performance of MMS's functions, and will it be useful?
        (b) Are the estimates of the burden hours of the proposed 
    collection reasonable?
        (c) Do you have any suggestions that would enhance the quality, 
    clarity, or usefulness of the information to be collected?
        (d) Is there a way to minimize the information collection burden on 
    those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate 
    automated electronic, mechanical, or other forms of information 
    technology?
        MMS Information Collection Clearance Officer: Jo Ann Lauterbach, 
    (202) 208-7744.
    
        Dated: April 7, 1998.
    John Mirabella,
    Acting Chief, Engineering and Operations Division.
    [FR Doc. 98-9969 Filed 4-14-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/15/1998
Department:
Minerals Management Service
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of a new information collection.
Document Number:
98-9969
Dates:
Submit written comments by June 15, 1998.
Pages:
18439-18440 (2 pages)
PDF File:
98-9969.pdf