[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 72 (Thursday, April 15, 1999)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18662-18764]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-8398]
[[Page 18661]]
_______________________________________________________________________
Part II
Department of Labor
_______________________________________________________________________
Employment and Training Administration
_______________________________________________________________________
20 CFR Part 652, et al.
Workforce Investment Act; Interim Final Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 72 / Thursday, April 15, 1999 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 18662]]
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
20 CFR Part 652 and Parts 660 through 671
RIN 1205-AB20
Workforce Investment Act
AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration (ETA), Labor.
ACTION: Interim Final Rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor (DOL) is issuing an Interim Final Rule
implementing provisions of titles I, III and V of the Workforce
Investment Act. Through these regulations, the Department implements
the first major reform of the nation's job training system in more than
15 years. Key components of this reform include streamlining services
through a One-Stop service delivery, empowering individuals through
information and access to training resources through Individual
Training Accounts, providing universal access to core services,
increasing accountability for results, ensuring a strong role for Local
Boards and the private sector in the workforce investment system,
facilitating State and local flexibility, and improving youth programs.
DATES: This Interim Final Rule will become effective on May 17, 1999.
Comment Period: Comments must be submitted by July 14, 1999. The
Department cannot guarantee that comments received after this date will
be considered. Comments that are less than 10 pages in length may be
transmitted via a facsimile at (202) 219-0323 provided that submission
of written text follows. Commenters wishing acknowledgment of receipt
of their comments must submit them by certified mail, return receipt
requested. Also, comments may be sent electronically using the Internet
web page at http://usworkforce.org.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments to the Employment and Training
Administration, Workforce Investment Act Implementation Taskforce, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW, Room S5513, Washington, DC 20210, Attention:
Eric Johnson.
All comments will be available for public inspection and copying
during normal business hours at the Employment and Training
Administration, Workforce Investment Act Implementation Taskforce, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW, Room S5513, Washington, DC 20210. Copies of
the Interim Final Rule are available in alternate formats of large
print and electronic file on computer disk, which may be obtained at
the above-stated address. The Interim Final Rule is also available on
the WIA website at http://usworkforce.org
In compliance with 28 U.S.C. 2112(a), the Employment and Training
Administration designates the Associate Solicitor for Employment and
Training Services, Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor,
200 Constitution Avenue, NW, Room N-2101, Washington, DC 20210, as the
recipient of petitions to review this Interim Final Rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Eric Johnson, Workforce Investment
Act Implementation Taskforce Office, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW, Room S5513, Washington, DC 20210, Telephone:
(202) 219-0316 (voice) (this is not a toll-free number) or 1-800-326-
2577 (TDD).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Paperwork Reduction Act
Certain sections of this Interim Final Rule, such as Secs. 667.300,
667.900, 668.800, and 669.570 contain information collection
requirements. As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3507(d)), the Department of Labor has submitted a copy of these
sections to the Office of Management and Budget for its review.
Comments must be submitted by May 17, 1999 to: Desk Officer for the
Department of Labor, Employment Training Administration, Office of
Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW (Rm 10235), Washington DC
20503. Affected parties do not have to comply with the information
collection requirements in this document until DOL publishes in the
Federal Register the control numbers assigned by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). Publication of the control numbers
notifies the public that OMB has approved this information collection
requirement under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. An OMB control
number (1205-0398) was issued for the WIA state planning guidance
authorized under 20 CFR 661.220, and published at 64 FR 9402 (Feb. 25,
1999).
I. Background
A. WIA Principles
On August 7, 1998, President Clinton signed the Workforce
Investment Act of 1998 (WIA), comprehensive reform legislation that
supersedes the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) and amends the
Wagner-Peyser Act. The WIA also contains the Adult Education and Family
Literacy Act (title II) and the Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1998
(title IV). Guidance or regulations implementing titles II and IV will
be issued by the Department of Education.
The WIA reforms Federal job training programs and creates a new,
comprehensive workforce investment system. The reformed system is
intended to be customer-focused, to help Americans access the tools
they need to manage their careers through information and high quality
services, and to help U.S. companies find skilled workers.
This new law embodies seven key principles. They are:
Streamlining services through better integration at the
street level in the One-Stop delivery system. Programs and providers
will co-locate, coordinate and integrate activities and information, so
that the system as a whole is coherent and accessible for individuals
and businesses alike.
Empowering individuals in several ways. First, eligible
adults are given financial power to use Individual Training Accounts
(ITA's) at qualified institutions. These ITA's supplement financial aid
already available through other sources, or, if no other financial aid
is available, they may pay for all the costs of training. Second,
individuals are empowered with greater levels of information and
guidance, through a system of consumer reports providing key
information on the performance outcomes of training and education
providers. Third, individuals are empowered through the advice,
guidance, and support available through the One-Stop system, and the
activities of One-Stop partners.
Universal access. Any individual will have access to the
One-Stop system and to core employment-related services. Information
about job vacancies, career options, student financial aid, relevant
employment trends, and instruction on how to conduct a job search,
write a resume, or interview with an employer is available to any job
seeker in the U.S., or anyone who wants to advance his or her career.
Increased accountability. The goal of the Act is to
increase employment, retention, and earnings of participants, and in
doing so, improve the quality of the workforce to sustain economic
growth, enhance productivity and competitiveness, and reduce welfare
dependency. Consistent with this goal, the Act identifies core
indicators of performance that State and local entities managing the
workforce investment system must meet--or suffer sanctions. However,
State and local entities
[[Page 18663]]
exceeding the performance levels can receive incentive funds. Training
providers and their programs also have to demonstrate successful
performance to remain eligible to receive funds under the Act. And
participants, with their ITA's, have the opportunity to make training
choices based on program outcomes. To survive in the market, training
providers must make accountability for performance and customer
satisfaction a top priority.
Strong role for local workforce investment boards and the
private sector, with local, business-led boards acting as ``boards of
directors,'' focusing on strategic planning, policy development and
oversight of the local workforce investment system. Business and labor
have an immediate and direct stake in the quality of the workforce
investment system. Their active involvement is critical to the
provision of essential data on what skills are in demand, what jobs are
available, what career fields are expanding, and the identification and
development of programs that best meet local employer needs. Highly
successful private industry councils under JTPA exhibit these
characteristics now. Under WIA, this will become the norm.
State and local flexibility. States and localities have
increased flexibility, with significant authority reserved for the
Governor and chief elected officials, to build on existing reforms in
order to implement innovative and comprehensive workforce investment
systems tailored to meet the particular needs of local and regional
labor markets.
Improved youth programs linked more closely to local labor
market needs and community youth programs and services, and with strong
connections between academic and occupational learning. Youth programs
include activities that promote youth development and citizenship, such
as leadership development through voluntary community service
opportunities; adult mentoring and followup; and targeted opportunities
for youth living in high poverty areas.
Many States and local areas have already taken great strides in
implementing these principles, supported by grants from the Department
of Labor to build One-Stop service delivery systems and school-to-work
transition systems. The Act builds on these reforms and ensures that
they will be available throughout the country.
The Department wishes to emphasize that it considers the reforms
embodied in the Workforce Investment Act to be pivotal, and not
``business as usual.'' This legislation provides unprecedented
opportunity for major reforms that can result in a reinvigorated,
integrated workforce investment system. States and local communities,
together with business, labor, community-based organizations,
educational institutions, and other partners, must seize this historic
opportunity by thinking expansively as they design a customer-focused,
comprehensive delivery system.
The success of the reformed workforce investment system is
dependent on the development of true partnerships and honest
collaboration at all levels and among all stakeholders. While the
Workforce Investment Act and these regulations assign specific roles
and responsibilities to specific entities, for the system to realize
its potential necessitates moving beyond current categorical
configurations and institutional interests. Also, it is imperative that
input is received from all stakeholders and the public at each stage of
the development of State and local workforce investment systems.
The cornerstone of the new workforce investment system is One-Stop
service delivery which unifies numerous training, education and
employment programs into a single, customer-friendly system in each
community. The underlying notion of One-Stop is the coordination of
programs, services and governance structures so that the customer has
access to a seamless system of workforce investment services. It is
envisioned that a variety of programs could use common intake, case
management and job development systems in order to take full advantage
of the One-Stops' potential for efficiency and effectiveness. A wide
range of services from a variety of training and employment programs
will be available to meet the needs of employers and job seekers. The
challenge in making One-Stop live up to its potential is to make sure
that the State and Local Boards can effectively coordinate and
collaborate with the network of other service agencies, including TANF
agencies, transportation agencies and providers, metropolitan planning
organizations, child care agencies, nonprofit and community partners,
and the broad range of partners who work with youth.
B. Early Implementation
Many States have expressed interest in which features of WIA may be
phased-in after approval of the State workforce investment plan, and
how long they will have before they must be in full compliance.
The planning guidance (which was published in the Federal
Register on February 25, 1999) and regulations specify that States may
submit a State workforce investment plan to the Department for approval
at any time between April 1, 1999 and April 1, 2000. For those States
that plan to transition to WIA prior to July 1, 2000, and do not have
all policies, procedures and systems fully developed, the State may
submit a Transition Plan that outlines when the State expects to have
each of the WIA components (for example, the One-Stop system, or the
Individual Training Account system) fully operational. All components
must be in place by July 1, 2000. Under this option, the Department
will conditionally approve the State workforce investment plan. The
State workforce investment plan will be fully approved once all of the
WIA components are in place. This option provides some flexibility for
early implementing States, while ensuring that full implementation is
completed for all States by July 1, 2000.
States and local areas may use the current waiver
authority and allowable activities under JTPA, to plan for and
implement WIA reforms. Activities that are allowable during this phase
include: (1) Strategic planning; (2) establishment of State and local
workforce investment boards; (3) consultation with One-Stop partners;
(4) establishment of ITA systems; and (5) establishment of consumer
report systems.
Because JTPA title II youth funds are available for
obligation on April 1, 1999, the Calendar Year 1999 Summer Youth
Employment and Training Program, and JTPA title II-C youth program
allocations have been made and are to be allocated by States to local
areas under the JTPA rules. The Department will issue transition
guidance which will provide further direction and specification.
A 90 percent hold harmless provision for within-State
allocations for the youth and adult funding streams, that is based on
allocations in the first two years of WIA operation, becomes effective
in the third year a State operates under WIA. Structured to facilitate
creation of new local areas by freeing States from allocation formulas
established under JTPA, there is no hold harmless provision effective
in the first two years of a state's WIA implementation that would cover
the transition period from JTPA. The lack of a hold harmless provision
during this period could result in some instability during the early
stages of WIA implementation. However, Governors do have options
available to promote stability. For program year 1999 only, the
Governor may elect to utilize the
[[Page 18664]]
JTPA hold harmless provision. However, in doing so, the two year hold
harmless is delayed for one year. Therefore, if a State elects to use
this option, the two year hold harmless would apply for PY 2000 and
2001 unless Congress decides to address this area with a technical
amendment. Also, Governors may use some of their 15 percent State
reserve funds to assist local areas that are negatively impacted by the
WIA funding formulas, or choose to adopt an adult or youth within-State
allocation formula that incorporates additional targeting factors,
provided for in sections 128 and 133 of WIA.
C. Rule Format
The format, as well as the substance, of the Interim Final Rule,
reflects the Administration's commitment to regulatory reform and to
writing regulations that are reader-friendly. The Department has
attempted to make these regulations clear and easy to understand, as
well as to anticipate issues that may arise and to provide appropriate
direction. To this end, the regulatory text is presented in a
``question and answer'' format. The Department has organized the
regulations in a way that will help those who must implement the new
system to recognize the various steps they must take as they develop
the organization and services that make up the workforce investment
system. In many cases, the provisions of WIA are not repeated in these
regulations. As requested by some interested parties, however, in a
number of instances, it was determined that the regulations would
provide context and be more reader-friendly if the Act's provisions
were included in an answer rather than merely cross-referencing the
statute.
Section 506(c)(1) of the Act requires the Secretary of Labor to
issue this Interim Final Rule implementing provisions of the WIA under
the Department's purview within 180 days of enactment. WIA also
requires that final regulations be published by December 31, 1999.
Under Secretary of Labor's Order No. 4-75, the Assistant Secretary for
Employment and Training has been delegated the responsibility to carry
out WIA policies, programs, and activities for the Secretary of Labor.
Given the short time frame imposed, the Department has employed a
variety of means to initiate extensive coordination with other Federal
agencies that have roles and responsibilities under the Workforce
Investment Act. In addition, the Department of Labor, the Department of
Education, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department
of Transportation, and the Department of Housing and Urban Development
continue to meet on a regular basis to resolve issues surrounding the
development of the Interim Final Rule and WIA implementation.
The Department also requested and received input from a broad range
of sources regarding guidance on how to comply with a number of WIA
statutory provisions. The Department solicited broad input on WIA
implementation through a variety of mechanisms: establishing a website
to encourage input; publishing a Federal Register notice on September
15, 1998, conducting regional and national panel discussions in October
1998; publishing a White Paper announcing goals and principles
governing implementation; posting issues on the usworkforce.org
website; sharing a discussion draft of regulatory issues with
stakeholders; holding town hall meetings across the country in December
1998; conducting several workgroups in December 1998; and issuing draft
Planning Guidance in December 1998.
A number of the suggestions received are discussed in the Summary
and Explanation of the individual provisions of the Interim Final Rule.
However, because of the large volume of suggestions received and the
short time allowed for preparation of the regulations, as well as the
fact that suggestions continue to be received, it was not possible to
address each one. Where input has not been addressed, it will be
considered along with comments on the Interim Final Rule before
publication of the Final Rule. Also, the Department will ensure that
there are other opportunities for public input and dialogue on the
important issues surrounding implementation of the Workforce Investment
Act prior to the publication of the Final Rule.
The Department has determined that this Interim Final Rule, as
promulgated, complies with the WIA statutory mandate and provides
effective direction for the implementation of WIA programs. ETA will
review all comments received in the development of and response to the
Interim Final Rule, as well as the experience of early implementing
States, in considering what further action is necessary in promulgating
a Final Rule.
II. Summary and Explanation
This section describes and explains the specific provisions of the
Interim Final Rule. The explanatory text, in general, adheres closely
to the corresponding WIA statutory and regulatory language. A
supporting rationale is provided in those instances where the Rule
promulgates specific provisions to fulfill the requirements of the WIA
statute.
The Department has set regulations only where they are necessary to
clarify or to explain how the Department intends to interpret the WIA
statute, to provide context for interpretations or to provide a clear
statement of the Act's requirements. In several instances--for example,
the Indian and Native American Programs, and Migrant and Seasonal
Farmworker Programs--the regulations were developed in consultation
with advisory councils and are more comprehensive in order to assist
those grantees. Consistent with the Act, the Interim Final Rule
provides the States and local governments with the primary
responsibility to initiate and develop program implementation
procedures and policy guidance regarding WIA administration. The
Department has not defined what constitutes many of the activities
under the Act in order to provide policy-making flexibility to States
and local areas. Section 661.120 formalizes this flexibility in the
regulations.
Description of Regulatory Provisions
The Rule adds 12 new parts to the Code of Federal Regulations, and
a new subpart to the existing Wagner-Peyser Act regulations. Parts 660-
672 are organized by subject matter; for example, 661 describes State
and local system design, 667 contains administrative requirements
applicable to WIA title I funds, and 669 describes requirements
particularly applicable to Migrant and Seasonal Farmworker programs.
This discussion section follows that organizational structure.
Part 660--Introduction to the Regulations for the Workforce
Investment Systems Under Title I of the Workforce Investment Act
Part 660 discusses the purpose of title I of the Workforce
Investment Act, explains the format of the regulations governing title
I, and provides definitions which are not found in the Act. Sections
101, 142, 166(b), 167(h) 301 and 502 of the Act contain additional
definitions. Among the regulatory definitions, the Department has
defined the term ``register'' in order to clarify that programs do not
need to register participants until they receive a core service beyond
those that are self-service or informational. This point in time also
corresponds to the point when the EEO data must be collected, when the
eligibility definition begins, and when the participants are counted
for performance measurement purposes.
[[Page 18665]]
Part 661--Statewide and Local Governance of the Workforce
Investment System Under Title I of the Workforce Investment Act
Introduction
This part covers the critical underpinnings of how the workforce
investment system is organized under WIA at the State and local levels.
Specifically, it consists of four subparts--General Governance, State
Governance, Local Governance Provisions and Waiver Provisions. The
General Governance subpart broadly describes the WIA system and sets
forth the roles of the governmental partners. The State and local
subparts cover the State and local workforce investment boards and the
designation process, including alternative entities, and the planning
requirements. The waiver subpart discusses the processes for obtaining
general and work-flex waivers.
Subpart A--General Governance Provisions
1. Subpart A describes the workforce investment system, and sets
forth the roles of the government partners in the system: the Federal
government, State governments and local governments. The workforce
investment system is the method of delivery of workforce investment
activities to individuals under title I of WIA, and is composed of
State and local workforce investment boards, local workforce investment
areas, and the One-Stop system. Through the One-Stop system, the
workforce investment system is a gateway to a wide variety of
employment, training, educational and other human resource programs. In
the Department's view, close cooperation and coordination among the
Federal, State and local government partners are essential to the
system's success in providing services to those who need them. Sections
661.110 and 661.120, describe, in general terms, the roles of the
government partners. The Department sees one of its roles as Federal
partner as providing leadership, guidance and support to the system, so
that State and local governmental partners can better respond to the
needs of customers. To that end, the WIA regulations are intended to
provide a framework in which States and local partners may design
systems and deliver services in ways that best achieve the goals of WIA
based on particular need. Thus, whenever possible, items such as design
options and categories of service are not narrowly defined in the
regulations. Section 660.120 provides authority to State and local
governments to establish their own policies, interpretations,
guidelines and definitions relating to program operations under title
I, as long as they are not inconsistent with WIA or the regulations,
and, in the case of local governments, not inconsistent with State
policies. To assist with such interpretations, the Department, with the
participation of other Federal agencies, as appropriate, will issue
technical assistance guidance to help States and localities interpret
WIA and the regulations. Such guidance is not intended to limit State
flexibility, but rather is intended to provide helpful models on which
States and local governments can rely to ensure that their own
interpretations are not inconsistent with the Act and regulations.
Subpart B--State Governance Provisions
1. State Workforce Investment Board: Sections 661.200--661.210
describe the membership requirements and responsibilities of the State
Workforce Investment Board (State Board) and procedures regarding
designation of an alternative entity to perform the functions of the
State Board. The role of the State Board is to assist the Governor in
the development of the State workforce investment plan (State Plan) and
to carry out the additional functions described in WIA section 111(d).
Section 661.200 describes the membership requirements of the State
Board. This section clarifies that State Boards must contain two or
more members from each of the representative categories described in
sections 111(b)(1)(C)(iii)-(v) of WIA. These categories are labor
organizations, individuals and organizations that have experience with
youth activities, and individuals and organizations that have
experience and expertise in the delivery of workforce investment
activities. The Rule requires that, in appointing representatives with
experience in workforce investment activities, special consideration be
given to chief executive officers of community colleges and community-
based organizations in the State. The Department acknowledges the
special expertise that the community college system brings to the
workforce investment system. The Department foresees a strong role for
community colleges across states and in local areas and encourages
states and local areas to appoint presidents and executive officers of
the state community college system and local community colleges to the
State and Local Workforce Investment Boards. The Department also
emphasizes the importance of including the director of the state agency
responsible for TANF on the State Board, in order to foster linkages
between WIA and TANF, and to facilitate participation of TANF in One-
Stop systems in the state.
The Department also received suggestions concerning the
representation of the State Vocational Rehabilitation Services program,
a required One-Stop partner, on the State Board. Individuals with
disabilities represent a large untapped potential workforce, and the
workforce needs of this group is of significant importance to the
Department and other Federal agencies. To signal the importance of this
issue, the Presidential Taskforce on Employment of Adults with
Disabilities was formed in 1998. In light of this emphasis on
increasing the employment rate for individuals with disabilities as
well as the complexity of the organizational requirements applicable to
this program, the director of the designated State unit under section
101(a)(2)(B)(ii)(II) of the Rehabilitation Act, if a State has such a
unit, should be considered the lead State agency official with
responsibility for the State's vocational rehabilitation program and,
therefore, should serve on the State Board. In addition, a program
operated by a State agency for the blind or by a designated State unit
for the blind should be considered a separate program for purposes of
appointing members to the State Board under WIA section 111. Among the
contributions the unit head(s) would make as a member of the State
Board is assisting in the development of the State performance
measures. The expertise of the unit head(s) would be particularly
useful since the Department, in coordination with the Department of
Education, will be working on the development of an additional
performance indicator focusing on individuals with disabilities that
may be used by States under title I of WIA. The Department of Labor and
the Department of Education will work with the States as they develop
and implement their State plans to ensure the effective delivery of
services under the WIA to individuals with disabilities. The Department
will also be conducting a study of WIA implementation that will include
a review of the manner and extent to which Vocational Rehabilitation
programs are integrated in the workforce investment system, and how
effectively the system serves individuals with disabilities.
As discussed below, regarding local workforce investment board
(Local Board) membership requirements, the
[[Page 18666]]
Department received substantial input expressing concern that the
statutory membership requirements relating to the State and local
boards will lead to large, unmanageable State and Local Boards. In
contrast, others thought larger boards would be better in representing
a wider array of interests. The Department recognizes this concern,
and, although constrained by the statutory requirements that each
category of membership contain more than one representative and a
business majority, the Department has avoided adding additional
requirements relating to the number of members required. The Department
believes that problems associated with large board size can be
addressed in a number of ways, such as the use of committees. The
Department will be providing technical assistance on creative
approaches State and Local Boards may wish to consider in addressing
this issue.
2. Alternative Entities: The Department believes that changing from
existing JTPA boards and councils to State Boards meeting the
requirements of WIA section 111(b) is essential to the reforms of WIA.
The Department encourages all States to create new, fully functional
State Boards as early as possible, and is committed to providing
assistance to States to make such changes. In order to accommodate
States that have already begun to reform their boards prior to the
enactment of WIA, the statute provides an option to use an existing
entity to carry out the functions of the State Board. Section 661.210
describes the requirements relating to the appointment of this
alternative entity. Because of questions regarding the application of
these requirements, paragraph (b) of Sec. 661.210 makes clear that an
alternative entity must meet each of the three criteria set forth in
WIA section 111(e). The three criteria are that the entity: (1) Was in
existence on December 31, 1997; (2)(a) was established pursuant to
section 122 or title VII of the Job Training Partnership Act, as in
effect on December 31, 1997, or (b) is substantially similar to the
State Board as described in subsections (a), (b), and (c) of WIA
section 111; and (3) includes representatives of business in the state
and representatives of labor organizations in the state. An entity
which fails to meet any one of the criteria is not eligible to perform
the functions of the State Board. A key requirement for an alternative
entity that was not created under JTPA, is that it be substantially
similar to the Boards required under WIA. The Department considered
various ways to define the term ``substantially similar'' but, in the
end, decided to leave the term undefined. All groups required for
membership on Workforce Investment Boards are equally important and the
Department sees alternative entities as a transitional phase during
which states can operate until a new Board is appointed.
While an alternative entity need not contain the identical
membership structure required of State Boards, in the Department's view
it is important that each of the groups listed in WIA section 111(b)
have a role in the workforce investment system if the system is to be
successful. Therefore, the Rule requires that if the Governor
identifies an alternative entity, the State Plan must explain how the
State will ensure the ongoing participation of any omitted membership
groups in the functions of State workforce investment system. While
this Rule does not mean that omitted groups must be seated on an
alternative entity, it does require that the State Plan describe how
these groups will have an opportunity for meaningful input into
decisions made by the State Board.
Paragraph (d) of Sec. 661.210 amplifies the requirement that an
alternative entity must have been established by and in existence on
December 31, 1997. Because of this requirement, modifications to the
alternative entity are not allowed; a change to the membership
structure after December 31, 1997 will invalidate the entity's
eligibility as an alternative entity. The membership structure is not
considered to be changed when an existing member leaves the board and a
replacement member is appointed. However, the membership structure is
considered to be changed when a change is made to the organizational
structure of the State Board that requires a change (whether the change
is formally made or not) in the State Board's charter or to a similar
document that defines the organizational structure of the State Board,
such as appointing members of a category not previously represented. In
such a case, the entity would no longer be eligible to perform the
functions of the State Board and a new entity, meeting all the
requirements of section 111 of WIA must be created. This prevents
piecemeal modification of alternative entities that would add certain
section 111(b) membership categories but not others.
3. State Workforce Investment Plan Requirements: Sections 661.220
and 661.230, describe the requirements for submission, approval and
modification of the State workforce investment plan. The State Plan
must be submitted in accordance with planning guidelines to be issued
by the Secretary, and must be developed through an open public comment
process. The State Plan must document the timeline and the steps taken
to ensure the opportunity for meaningful public comment. The Department
intends that the information contained in the State Plan be subject to
the broadest possible stakeholder involvement in policy development and
the broadest possible range of public comment. The planning guidelines
set forth the information needed for the Secretary to make an informed
judgment as to whether a State Plan is consistent with WIA. The Rule
restates the statutory language regarding the process for State Plan
approval. All plans must be approved within 90 days unless the
Secretary determines in writing that the State Plan is inconsistent
with the provisions of title I of WIA and its implementing regulations
or it does not satisfy the State Plan approval requirements of the
Wagner-Peyser Act and its implementing regulations. This reflects
changes made by the technical corrections added in the Omnibus
Appropriations Act for FY 1999, which clarified that the State plan
will not be approved if it fails to meet the requirements of either WIA
or the Wagner-Peyser Act rather than only when it fails to meet both.
Failure to have completed negotiations with the Secretary of Labor on
performance measures means the plan is not consistent with title I of
WIA. A state's failure to have an effective strategy in place to ensure
the development of a fully operational One-Stop delivery system in the
state also means the state plan is not consistent with WIA title I. An
important part of this strategy is an impasse procedure designed to
facilitate collaboration and coordination between One-Stop partners at
the local level.
4. State Plan Modifications: Section 661.230 provides the approval
process for State Plan modifications. It clarifies that modifications
may be made at any time during the life of the State Plan, and must be
made upon certain conditions. Because the State Plan is a five year
strategic plan and designed to be a living document, it is likely that
assumptions based upon such things as State or Federal policy, economic
conditions, performance goals, State and local organizational
structures and/or State and local needs may change during the course of
the State Plan. The provision for a five year State Plan was intended
to reduce paperwork burdens on the States. Accordingly, only
significant changes require a modification. Examples are: changes in
performance indicators, changes in the
[[Page 18667]]
methodology used to determine local allocation of funds, or changes to
the membership structure of the State Board or alternative entity.
Modifications triggered by significant changes will be subject to the
same review process as the original State Plan. While it is impossible
to foresee all such changes that may occur during a five year period,
through timely modifications of the State Plan, State strategies can
continue to guide Local Board policy development. The Secretary must
approve all State Plan modifications unless the disapproval criteria in
Sec. 661.220 are met.
5. Local Workforce Investment Area Designation Requirements:
Sections 661.250 through 661.280 discuss the requirements applicable to
the designation of local workforce investment areas. The Rule tracks
the statutory language regarding the State Board recommendation and
Governor's approval process for designation. It refers to the statutory
provisions regarding automatic designation of areas with a population
of 500,000 or more (that request designation) at section 116(a)(2) of
WIA and temporary and subsequent designation of JTPA service delivery
areas meeting certain performance criteria (that request designation)
at section 116(a)(3) of WIA. The statute prohibits the Department from
further regulating on the standards and criteria for temporary and
subsequent designation and requires the Department to provide the
States with technical assistance to make the designations. The
regulations restate the statutory language regarding the rights of
areas to appeal the denial of a request for automatic or temporary and
subsequent designation as a local workforce investment area.
6. Regional Planning Activities: Section 661.290 describes the
circumstances in which the State may require Local Boards to take part
in regional planning activities. This provision permits States to
undertake methods to improve performance across area boundaries by
requiring local areas to engage in a regional planning process to share
employment-related information and to coordinate the provision of local
services pursuant to that regional planning. The regulation follows the
statutory language regarding the requirements for regional planning,
and permits regional planning to occur across State boundaries. Section
661.290 clarifies that Local Boards which are part of State-designated
regional planning areas must participate in regional planning
activities. However, to strike a balance, the regulation also provides
that regional planning and performance requirements may not substitute
for the local planning and performance requirements unless the affected
chief elected officials and the Governor agree to that substitution.
Subpart C--Local Governance Provisions
This Subpart covers the designation of local workforce investment
areas and the responsibilities and membership requirements of local
boards.
1. Role of the Local Workforce Investment Board: Under WIA, the
Local Board, in partnership with the chief elected official, is
responsible for setting policy and overseeing workforce investment
programs for a workforce investment area. Sections 661.300 and 661.305
reiterate the roles and responsibilities of Local Boards. There was
some concern expressed that the Local Board activities be carried out
in an open manner which encourages public comment and participation.
The Department responds to these concerns by restating the WIA section
117(e) ``sunshine provision'' in Sec. 661.305(d).
2. Local Boards as Service Providers: Section 117(f)(1) of WIA
places limitations on Local Boards' direct provision of core services,
intensive services, or training services. In response to requests for
clarification, Sec. 661.310(c) specifies that the prohibition related
to providing core, intensive and training services by the Local Board
also applies to the staff of the Local Board. This regulation also
cites the statutory provision allowing a Local Board to be designated
or certified as a One-Stop operator only with the agreement of the
chief elected official and the Governor.
3. Membership Requirements: Section 661.315 of the regulations
addresses the membership requirements for the Local Board that are
contained in section 117(b) of WIA. There were suggestions on several
issues related to the required membership of the Local Board,
particularly as to how the terms ``representatives'' and ``including''
would be defined.
Representatives: Some parties expressed the view that the term
``representatives,'' as used in section 117(b)(2)(A) (ii)-(v) of WIA,
requires that there be multiple representatives from each of the
specified entities. While others wanted a more restrictive definition,
the regulations specify that the Local Board must contain two or more
members representing the categories described in section 117(b)(2)(A)
(ii)-(v) of WIA. These categories cover different types of local
educational entities, labor organizations, community-based
organizations (including those representing individuals with
disabilities and veterans), and economic development agencies.
Including: There also were many questions on the meaning of the
term ``including'' as it is used in WIA section 117(b). Some expressed
the view that each of the entities following the word ``including'' in
section 117(b)(2)(A)(ii), (iv), and (v) of WIA must be a required
member of the Local Board, while others disagreed with this
interpretation. The regulations address this issue by requiring that
special consideration be given to including representatives of
community colleges in the selection of members representing local
educational entities; to including representatives of organizations
representing individuals with disabilities and veterans, in selection
of members representing community-based organizations; and
representatives of private sector economic development entities in
selecting representatives of economic development agencies. The
regulations do not mandate a membership seat for each such entity.
Board Size: The Department heard many concerns that the statutory
membership requirements relating to Local Boards will lead to large,
unwieldy, and unmanageable Local Boards. The Department recognizes this
concern, and while the Department is constrained by the statutory
requirements that each category of membership contain more than one
representative and that the board contain a business majority, the
Department has not added additional regulatory requirements on the
number of members required. The Department believes that problems
associated with large board size can be addressed in a number of ways,
such as through the use of committees. The Department will provide
technical assistance on creative approaches State and Local Boards may
wish to consider in addressing this issue.
4. Alternative Entity: The Department believes that changing from
existing JTPA Private Industry Councils to local workforce investment
boards is essential to the reforms of WIA. The Department strongly
encourages all eligible areas to create new, fully functional Local
Boards as early as possible, and is committed to providing assistance
to facilitate such changes. However, the Department recognizes that the
statute provides an option to use an existing entity to carry out the
functions of the Local Board. Section 661.330 describes the
requirements relating to the appointment of such an alternative entity.
Because of questions regarding
[[Page 18668]]
the application of these requirements, paragraph (a) of Sec. 661.330
makes clear that an alternative entity must meet each of the four
criteria set forth in WIA section 117(i), including the requirement
that the alternative entity must have been established by December 31,
1997. An entity which fails to meet any one of these criteria is not
eligible to perform the functions of the Local Board.
While an alternative entity need not contain the identical
membership structure as that required of Local Boards, section
117(i)(1)(c)(ii) does require the alternative entity to be
substantially similar to the Local Boards. In the Department's view it
is extremely important that each of the groups listed in section
117(b)(2) have an active role in the workforce investment system if the
system is to be successful. Therefore, the Rule requires that the
alternative entity be identified in the State Plan and the local
workforce investment plan, and that these workforce investment plans
explain the manner in which the Local Board will ensure the ongoing
participation of any omitted membership groups in the local workforce
investment area. While this Rule does not require that such groups be
seated on the Board, it does require the State and local workforce
investment plans to describe the means by which such groups will have
periodic regular meaningful opportunities for input into decisions made
by the Local Board.
Paragraph (c) of Sec. 661.330 amplifies the requirement that an
alternative entity must have been established by and in existence on
December 31, 1997. Because of this requirement, modifications of the
alternative entity are not allowed; any change to the membership
structure will invalidate the entity's eligibility as an alternative
entity. The membership structure is not considered to be changed when
an existing member leaves the Local Board and a replacement member is
appointed. However, it is considered to be changed when a change is
made to the organizational structure of the Local Board that requires a
change (whether the change is formally made or not) in the Local
Board's charter or to a similar document that defines the
organizational structure of the Local Board, such as appointing members
of a category not previously represented. In that case, the entity is
no longer eligible to perform the functions of the Local Board and a
new entity, meeting all the requirements of section 117 of WIA must be
created. This prevents piecemeal modification of alternative entities
that would add certain WIA section 117(b)(2) membership categories, but
not others.
5. Youth Council: Section 117(h) of WIA establishes youth councils
as a subgroup of the Local Boards. Youth councils are an innovative new
entity intended to broaden participation in the design and delivery of
youth services at the local level. Section 661.335 describes the
relationship of the youth council to the Local Board as well as the
membership requirements and Sec. 661.340 explains the responsibilities
of the youth council, as described in section 117(h) of WIA.
6. Local Workforce Investment Plan: Sections 661.345 and 661.350
describe the requirements for the submission of the local workforce
investment plan (Local Plan) and the contents of the Local Plan.
Section 661.350 enumerates the Local Plan components outlined in WIA
section 118(b). The Local Plan also must include information on the
process for directing the One-Stop operators to give priority to low-
income individuals and recipients of public assistance in the event
that adult funds are limited, as required by WIA section 134(d)(4)(E).
This priority is discussed in more detail under Sec. 663.600.
Section 118 of WIA indicates that Local Plans cover a five year
period. Some parties suggested that modifications to the local plan
will likely be needed within the five year span. The Department
concurs, and the regulations permit the Governor to require local plan
modifications and, at Sec. 661.355, offer a few examples of when such
modifications might be required by the Governor. Section 661.355 states
that the Governor must establish procedures for Local Plan
modifications.
Subpart D--Waivers and Workflex
Subpart D indicates the elements of WIA and the Wagner-Peyser Act
that may and may not be waived under either the General Waiver
Authority or the Work Flex provision. The purpose of the general
statutory and regulatory waiver authority provided by section 189(i)(4)
and workforce flexibility waiver authority provided at section 192 is
to give flexibility to States and local areas in the design and
implementation of consolidated workforce development programs under
WIA. The regulations specify that the Secretary does not intend to
waive any of the key elements of the reform principles embodied in the
Act (listed in the background section of this preamble and in
Sec. 661.400), except in extremely unusual circumstances. It also
specifies that the provisions that incorporate the reform principles
embodied in the Act may not be waived under the Work Flex authority.
Part 662--Description of the One-Stop System Under Title I of the
Workforce Investment Act
Introduction
The establishment of a One-Stop delivery system for workforce
development services is a cornerstone of the reforms contained in title
I of WIA. This delivery system streamlines access to numerous workforce
investment and educational and other human resource services,
activities and programs. The Act's requirements build on reform efforts
that are already underway in all States through the Department's One-
Stop grant initiative. Rather than requiring individuals and employers
to seek workforce development information and services at several
different locations, which is often costly, discouraging and confusing,
WIA requires States and communities to integrate multiple workforce
development programs and resources for individuals at the ``street
level'' through a user friendly One-Stop delivery system. This system
will simplify and expand access to services for job seekers and
employers.
The Act specifies nineteen required One-Stop partners and an
additional five optional partners to streamline access to a range of
employment and training services. WIA requires coordination among all
Department of Labor funded programs as well as other workforce
investment programs administered by the Departments of Education,
Health and Human Services, and Housing and Urban Development. WIA also
encourages participation in the One-Stop delivery system by other
relevant programs, such as those administered by the Departments of
Agriculture, Health and Human Services, and Transportation, as well as
the Corporation for National and Community Service. In addition, local
areas are authorized to add additional partners as local needs may
require. All of these Federal Agencies will continue to work together
to ensure effective communication and collaboration at the Federal
level in support of One-Stop service delivery.
Subpart A--One-Stop Delivery System
1. Structure: Subpart A describes the structure of a One-Stop
delivery system. The regulation, at Sec. 662.100, describes the One-
Stop system as a seamless system of service delivery that is created
through the collaboration of entities responsible for separate
workforce development funding streams. The One-Stop system is designed
to enhance access to services and improve outcomes for individuals
seeking
[[Page 18669]]
assistance. The regulation specifically defines the system as
consisting of one or more comprehensive, physical One-Stop centers in a
local area that provides the core services specified in WIA section
134(d)(2) and that provide access to the other activities and programs
provided under WIA and by each One-Stop partner. In locating each
comprehensive center, Local Boards should coordinate with the broader
community, including transportation agencies, to ensure that the
centers are accessible to their customers. In addition to the
comprehensive centers, the regulation notes that WIA allows for three
other arrangements to supplement the comprehensive center. These
supplemental arrangements include: (1) A network of affiliated sites
that provide one or more of the programs, services and activities of
the partners; (2) a network of One-Stop partners through which the
partners provide services linked to an affiliated site and through
which all individuals are provided information on the availability of
core services in the local area; and (3) specialized centers that
address specific needs. In essence, this structure may be described as
a ``one right door and no wrong door'' approach. One-Stop partners have
an obligation to ensure that core services that are appropriate for
their particular populations are made available at one comprehensive
center. If an individual enters the system through one of the network
sites rather than the comprehensive One-Stop center, the individual may
still obtain certain services at the network site and information about
how and where all the other services provided through the One-Stop
system may be obtained.
Subpart B--One Stop Partners
1. Responsibilities: Subpart B identifies the One-Stop partners and
their responsibilities in the One-Stop delivery system. The required
partners are entities that carry out the workforce development
programs. They are specifically identified in section 121(b)(1) of WIA
and Sec. 662.200. The regulation at Sec. 662.200(a)(1)(i through vii)
separately specifies the funding streams under title I that are
included as required partners. The regulations also identify the other
required programs, with some clarification of the particular sections
of certain Acts (for example, the Vocational Rehabilitation Act and the
Carl D. Perkins Act) that authorize the program that must participate.
Section 662.210 identifies additional partners that may be a part of
the One-Stop system at local option.
Entities--The regulation at Sec. 662.220 provides a general
definition of the ``entity'' that carries out the specified programs
and serves as the partner. In light of the responsibilities of the
partners, which are described below and include decisions regarding the
use and administration of program resources, the regulation defines the
entity as the grant recipient or other entity or organization
responsible for administering the program's funds in the local area.
The term ``entity'' does not include service providers that contract
with or are subrecipients of the local entity. The regulation notes
that for programs that do not have local administrative entities, the
responsible State agency may be the One-Stop partner. In addition, the
regulation specifies the appropriate entity to serve as partner for the
Adult Education and Vocational Rehabilitation programs. Entities that
serve as the partner under the Indian and Native American, Migrant and
Seasonal Farmworker, Job Corps, and Youth programs are identified in
the sections of the regulations applicable to those programs.
Partner Responsibilities--This subpart also describes and
elaborates on the statutory responsibilities of the partners. The
regulation at Sec. 662.230 identifies the five provisions of the Act
that describe these responsibilities. One of the key responsibilities
of each partner is to make available at the comprehensive center
through the One-Stop system appropriate core services that are
applicable to the partner's program. The regulation at Sec. 662.240
lists the core services that are described in section 134(d)(2) of WIA,
and defines ``applicable'' to mean the services from that list that are
authorized and provided under the partner programs. The extent to which
core services are applicable to a partner program, as well as the
manner in which services are provided, are determined by the program's
authorizing statute.
Availability of Services--The regulation at Sec. 662.250 describes
where and to what extent the One-Stop partners must make available the
applicable core services. Since section 134(c) of WIA requires that
core services be provided, at a minimum, at one comprehensive physical
center, the regulation requires that the applicable core services
attributable to the partner's program be made available by each partner
at that comprehensive center. To avoid duplication of services
traditionally provided under the Wagner-Peyser Act, this requirement is
limited to those applicable core services that are in addition to the
basic labor exchange services traditionally provided in the local area
under the Wagner-Peyser program. While a partner would not, for
example, be required to duplicate an assessment provided under the
Wagner-Peyser Act, the partner would be expected to be responsible for
any needed assessment that includes additional elements specifically
tailored to participants under the partner's program. However, the
adult and dislocated worker program partners are required to make all
of the core services available at the center.
Flexibility--The regulations also provide significant flexibility
regarding how the core services are to be made available at the One-
Stop center by allowing for services to be provided through appropriate
technology at the center, through co-location of personnel, cross-
training of staff, or through contractual or other arrangements between
the partner and the service providers at the center.
2. Proportional Responsibility: The regulation also provides that
the responsibility for the provision of and financing for applicable
core services is to be proportionate to the use of services at the
center by individuals attributable to the partners' programs. The
regulation further provides that the individuals attributable to a
partners' program may include individuals referred through the center
and enrolled in the partner's program after the receipt of core
services, individuals enrolled prior to the receipt of core services,
individuals who meet the eligibility criteria for the partner's program
and who receive an applicable core service, or individuals who meet an
alternative definition described in the Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU), described in subpart C. This ``proportionate responsibility''
provision is intended to provide an equitable principle for sharing
responsibility among the partners. The regulation provides that the
specific method for determining proportionate responsibility (for
example, surveys) must be described in the MOU.
Additional Sites--The regulation provides that core services may be
provided at sites in addition to the comprehensive center under the
MOU. Therefore, it is not required that partners provide applicable
core services exclusively at a One-Stop center. If an individual seeks
core services at the One-Stop center rather than at the partner's site,
they should be made available to him or her without referral to another
location, but a partner is not required to route all of its
participants through the comprehensive One-Stop center.
Access to Services--The regulation at Sec. 662.260 provides that,
in addition to the provision of core services, the One-
[[Page 18670]]
Stop partners must use the One-Stop system to provide access to the
partners' other activities and programs. This access must be described
in the MOU. This requirement is essential to ensuring a seamless,
comprehensive workforce development system that identifies the service
options available to individuals and takes the critical next step of
facilitating access to these services.
3. Cost Sharing: The regulation at Sec. 662.270 provides that the
particular arrangements for funding the services provided through the
One-Stop system and the operating costs of the One-Stop system must be
described in the MOU. Each partner must contribute a fair share of the
operating costs based on the use of the One-Stop delivery system by
individuals attributable to the partner's program. This is an equitable
principle and there are a number of methods that may be used for
allocating costs among partners that are consistent with this principle
and the OMB circulars. To promote efficiency and optimal performance,
partner contributions for the administrative costs of the system may be
re-evaluated annually through the memorandum of understanding process.
The regulation identifies a number of methodologies, including cost
pooling, indirect cost allocation, and activity based cost allocation
plans, that may be used. The Department, in consultation with other
affected Federal agencies, intends to issue guidance or technical
assistance relating to cost allocation methods to assist in this area.
Allocation Process--The regulation at Sec. 662.280 clarifies that
the requirements of each partner's authorizing legislation continue to
apply under the One-Stop system. Therefore, while the overall effect of
linking One-Stop partners in the One-Stop system is to create universal
access to core services, the resources of each partner may only be used
to provide services that are authorized and provided under the
partner's program to individuals who are eligible under the program.
As noted above, consistent with this principle, there are a variety
of methods for allocating costs among programs. In sum, this regulation
is intended to clarify that participation in the One-Stop delivery
system is a requirement that is in addition to, rather than in lieu of,
the other requirements applicable to the partner program under each
authorizing law.
Subpart C--Memorandum of Understanding
Subpart C describes the operation of the local One-Stop system.
Section 662.300 addresses the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that
must be executed between the Local Board and the One-Stop partners.
Section 662.310 states that the local areas may develop a single
umbrella MOU covering all partners and the Local Board, or separate
MOU's between partners and the Local Board. In many areas, the umbrella
approach may be the preferred means to facilitate a comprehensive and
equitable resolution of the operational issues relating to the One-
Stop. The regulation also emphasizes that it is a legal obligation for
the partners and the Local Board to engage in good faith negotiation
and reach agreement on the MOU. The partners and the Local Boards may
seek the assistance of the appropriate State agencies, the Governor,
State Board or the appropriate parties in reaching agreement. The State
agencies, the State Board, and the Governor may also consult with the
appropriate Federal agencies to address impasse situations after
exhausting other alternatives. If an impasse has not been resolved,
parties that fail to execute an MOU may not be permitted to serve on
the Local Board. In addition, if a Local Board has not executed an MOU
with all required parties, the local area is not eligible for State
incentive grants awarded for local coordination.
Subpart D--One-Stop Operator
This subpart addresses the role and selection of One-Stop
operators. The operators are responsible for administering the One-Stop
centers and their role may range from simply coordinating service
providers in the center to being the primary provider of services at
the center. The role is determined by the Local Board. In areas where
there is more than one comprehensive One-Stop center, there may be
separate operators for each center or one operator for multiple
centers. The operator may be selected by the Local Board through a
competitive process, or the Local Board may designate a consortium that
includes three or more required One-Stop partners as an operator. The
Local Board itself may serve as a One-Stop operator only with the
consent of the chief elected official and the Governor. This subpart
also addresses the ``grandfathering'' of existing One-Stop operators.
The regulations provide some continuity for areas that have already
established One-Stop systems while ensuring that fundamental features
of the new One-Stop system are incorporated. A local area does not have
to comply with the One-Stop operator selection procedures if the One-
Stop delivery system, of which the operator is a part, existed before
August 7, 1998 (the date of the WIA's enactment); if the One-Stop
system includes all of the required One-Stop partners; and if an MOU is
executed consistent with the requirements of the Act.
Part 663--Adult and Dislocated Worker Activities Under Title I of
the Workforce Investment Act
Introduction
This part of the regulations describes requirements relating to the
services that are available for adults and dislocated workers. Along
with Wagner-Peyser labor exchange services, the required adult and
dislocated worker services, described as core, intensive, and training
services, form the backbone of the One-Stop delivery system. The WIA
goal of universal access to core services is achieved through close
integration of services provided by the Wagner-Peyser, WIA adult and
dislocated worker partners and other partners in the One-Stop center
and system. Intensive and training services are available to
individuals who meet the eligibility requirements for the funding
streams and who are determined to need these services to achieve
employment, or in the case of employed individuals, to obtain or retain
self-sufficient employment. Supportive services, to enable individuals
to participate in these other activities, including needs-related
payments for individuals in training, may also be provided.
These regulations also introduce the Individual Training Account
(ITA), which is a key reform element of the Workforce Investment Act.
Individuals are expected to take a proactive role in choosing the
training services which meet their needs. They will be provided with
quality information on providers of training and, armed with effective
case management and an ITA as the payment mechanism, they will have the
opportunity to choose the training provider that best meets their
needs.
Subpart A--One-Stop System
1. Role of the Adult and Dislocated Worker Program in the One-Stop
System: The regulation at Sec. 663.100 provides that the One-Stop
system is the basic delivery system for services to adults and
dislocated workers. The concept of a single system that provides
universal access to certain services to all individuals age 18 or older
is a key tenet of the Workforce Investment Act. The regulation reflects
the emphasis in WIA to consolidate and coordinate services. The grant
recipient(s) for the adult and dislocated worker program is a required
partner and is subject to Sec. 662.210
[[Page 18671]]
regarding required partner responsibilities. Access to services through
the One-Stop system ensures that individual needs are identified and,
to the extent possible, met. The consolidation of and access to
services will result in improved services for both adults and
dislocated workers.
2. Registration and Eligibility: Sections 663.105 through 663.120
address registration and basic eligibility requirements. In response to
concerns regarding the timing of eligibility determination for services
in a One-Stop system, the Department has provided general guidance in
the regulation at Sec. 663.105 on when adults and dislocated workers
must be registered. Sections 663.110 and 663.120 contain the basic
eligibility criteria for adults and dislocated workers, respectively.
Individuals who are primarily seeking information and do not seek
direct, one-on-one staff assistance, do not need to be registered.
However, when an individual seeks more than minimal assistance from
staff in taking the next steps toward self-sufficient employment, then
eligibility must be determined. Registration is the point at which
information that is used in performance measurement begins to be
collected. In addition, equal employment opportunity data must be
collected on individuals when any assessment or discretionary decision
regarding a specific individual is made. Such assessments or decisions
include: Decisions regarding service or program eligibility, either
positive or negative; and decisions made on the part of any workforce
investment system employee which lead to a targeting of services for
the individual. The Department will issue further guidance regarding
this data collection. Additional information needed to determine
eligibility for other assistance available at the One-Stop site may
also be determined at the same time. Program operators should determine
the information that they need for cost allocation purposes and when
they can most efficiently collect it. Electronic records systems allow
information to be collected incrementally as higher levels of
assistance are provided.
3. Displaced Homemaker Eligibility: In response to inquiries
regarding assistance to displaced homemakers, the regulation at
Sec. 663.120 clarifies that a displaced homemaker who has been
dependent on the income of another family member but is no longer
supported by that income, is unemployed or underemployed and is
experiencing difficulty in obtaining or upgrading employment, may
receive assistance with funds available to Local Boards for services to
dislocated workers.
4. Title I Funds: Section 663.145 clarifies how title I adult and
dislocated worker funds are used to contribute to the provision of core
services, and to provide intensive and training services through the
One-Stop delivery system. All three types of services must be provided,
but the Local Boards determine the mix of the three services.
5. Sequence of Services: WIA provides for three levels of services:
Core, intensive, and training, with service at one level being a
prerequisite to moving to the next level. There was a great deal of
concern expressed about how this tiered approach would be implemented.
Many were particularly concerned that the Department might require a
``failed'' job search or a minimum time period in one level of service
before moving on to the next level. The regulations establish the
concept of a tiered approach but allow significant flexibility at the
local level. The Department, in response to the comments received, did
not establish a minimum number of ``failed'' job applications or a
minimum time period but, instead, allows localities to establish
gateway activities that lead from participation in core to intensive
and training services. Any core service, such as an initial assessment
or job search and placement assistance, could be the gateway activity.
In intensive services, the gateway activity could be the development of
an individual employment plan, individual counseling and career
planning or another intensive service. Key to these gateway activities
is the determination, made at the local level, that intensive or
training services are required for the participant to achieve the goal
of obtaining or retaining self-sufficient employment. The three levels
of services are discussed separately in the regulations.
6. Core Services: The regulations at Secs. 663.150 to 663.165
discuss the core services. All of the core services that are listed in
the Act must be made available in each local area through the One-Stop
system. Followup services must be available for a minimum of 12 months
after employment begins, to registered participants who are placed in
unsubsidized employment. Among the core services available is
information on targeted assistance available through the One-Stop
system for specific groups of workers, such as Migrant and Seasonal
Farm Workers, and veterans.
Core services also include assistance in establishing eligibility
for the Welfare-to-Work program and programs of financial aid for
training and education programs. The specific form of this assistance
is determined at the local level based on the participant's needs and
in coordination with the other partner programs. This assistance may
include: referrals to specific agencies; information relating to, or
provision of, required applications or other forms; or specific on-site
assistance.
Another core service is the provision of information relating to
the availability of supportive services, including child care and
transportation, available in the local area, and referral to such
services as appropriate. The Department encourages Local Boards to
establish strong linkages with a variety of supportive service
programs, including Food Stamps, Medicaid programs, and CHIP. Such
programs provide key supports for low-income working families and
families making the transition from welfare to self-sufficiency.
The Department also encourages Local Boards to establish strong
linkages to child support agencies and organizations serving fathers.
WIA services can help raise the employment and earnings of non-
custodial fathers and fathers living with their children so that they
can better support their children. Child support payments help low
income single parents stabilize and raise their income. At the same
time, it is important for One-Stop programs to be aware of the child
support requirements on non-custodial parents who may receive services.
Subpart B--Intensive Services
1. Intensive Services for Adults and Dislocated Workers: The
regulation at Sec. 663.200 discusses intensive services. The regulation
provides that intensive services beyond those listed in the Act may
also be provided. Out-of-area job search expenses, relocation expenses,
internships, and work experience are specifically mentioned to clarify
that they are among the additional intensive services that may be
provided. Intensive services are intended to identify obstacles to
employment through a comprehensive assessment or individual employment
plan in order to determine specific services needed, such as counseling
and career planning, referrals to community services, and, if
appropriate, referrals to training.
2. Participation in Intensive Services: Section 663.220 explains
that intensive services are provided to unemployed adults and
dislocated workers who are unable to obtain employment through core
services and require these services to obtain or retain employment, and
employed workers who need services to obtain or retain employment that
leads
[[Page 18672]]
to self-sufficiency. The regulations at Secs. 663.240 through 663.250
specify that an individual must receive at least one intensive service,
such as the development of an individual employment plan with a case
manager or individual counseling and career planning, before the
individual may receive training services and that there is no Federally
required minimum time for participation in intensive services. Each
person in intensive services should have a case management file, either
hard copy, electronic or both. Section 663.240 explains that the case
file must contain a determination of need for training services, as
identified through the intensive service received.
3. Self-sufficiency: This regulation, at Sec. 663.230, discusses
how ``self-sufficiency'' should be determined. WIA requires a
determination that employed adults and dislocated workers need
intensive or training services to obtain or retain employment that
allows for self-sufficiency as a condition for providing those
services. Recognizing that there are different local conditions that
should be considered in this determination, the regulation provides
maximum flexibility, requiring only that self-sufficiency mean
employment that pays at least the lower living standard income level.
State Boards or Local Boards must set the criteria for determining
whether employment leads to self-sufficiency. Such factors as family
size and local economic conditions may be included in the criteria. It
may often occur that dislocated workers require a wage higher than the
lower living standard income level to maintain self-sufficiency.
Therefore, the Rule allows self-sufficiency for a dislocated worker to
be defined in relation to a percentage of the lay-off wage.
Subpart C--Training Services
1. Training Services: Training services are discussed at
Secs. 663.300 and 663.320. Training services are designed to equip
individuals to enter the workforce and retain employment. Under JTPA, a
dislocated worker participating in training under title III of JTPA is
deemed to be in training with the approval of the State Unemployment
Compensation Agency. With such approval, unemployment compensation
cannot be denied to the individual solely on the basis that the
individual is not available for work because he or she is in training.
Although there is no comparable provision in WIA, this JTPA provision
will remain in effect during the transition period under the
Secretary's authority to guide that transition from JTPA to WIA. The
Department will seek an amendment adding similar language to WIA which
would deem all adults participating in training under title I of WIA to
be in approved training for the purposes of unemployment compensation
qualification.
2. Determining the Need for Training: The regulations at
Sec. 663.310 provide that the One-Stop operator or partner determines
the need for training based on an individual (1) meeting the
eligibility requirements for intensive services; (2) being unable to
obtain or retain employment through such services; and (3) being
determined after an interview, evaluation or assessment to be in need
of training. Section 663.310 requires that, to receive training, an
individual must select a program of services directly linked to
occupations in demand in the area, based on information provided by the
One-Stop operator or partner. If individuals are willing to relocate,
they may receive training in occupations in demand in another area.
3. Requirements When Other Grant Assistance is Available to
Participants. Section 663.320 implements the requirements of WIA
section 134(d)(4)(B), which limits the use of WIA funds for training
services to instances when there is no or inadequate grant assistance
from other sources available to pay for those costs. The statute
specifically requires that funds not be used to pay for the costs of
training when Pell Grant funds or grant assistance from other sources
are available to pay the costs. This section is intended to give effect
to this WIA requirement and still give effect to title IV of the Higher
Education Act (HEA) as amended (20 U.S.C. 1087uu), which prohibits
taking into account either a Pell Grant or other Federal student
financial assistance when determining an individual's eligibility for,
or the amount of, any other Federal funding assistance program.
Section 134(d)(4)(B) of WIA requires the coordination of training
costs with funds available under other Federal programs. To avoid
duplicate payment of costs when an individual is eligible for both WIA
and other assistance, including a Pell Grant, Sec. 663.320(b) requires
that program operators and training providers coordinate by entering
into arrangements with the entities administering the alternate sources
of funds, including eligible providers administering Pell Grants. These
entities should consider all available sources of funds, excluding
loans, in determining an individual's overall need for WIA funds. The
exact mix of funds should be determined based on the availability of
funding for either training costs or supportive services, with the goal
of ensuring that the costs of the training program the participant
selects are fully paid and that necessary supportive services are
available so that the training can be completed successfully. This
determination should focus on the needs of the participant; simply
reducing the amount of WIA funds by the amount of Pell Grant funds is
not permitted. Participation in a training program funded under WIA may
not be conditioned on applying for or using a loan to help finance
training costs.
With such coordination and arrangements, the WIA counselor is
likely to know the amount of WIA funds available to the WIA participant
when calculating the amount of financial assistance needed for the
participant to complete the training program successfully. The WIA
counselor needs to work with the WIA participant to calculate the total
funding resources available as well as to assess the full ``education
and education related costs'' (training and supportive services costs)
incurred if the participant is to complete the chosen program. This
also ensures both that duplicate payments of training costs are not
made and that the amount of WIA funded training is not reduced by the
amount of Federal student financial assistance in violation of 20
U.S.C. 1087uu.
It is important to note that the Pell Grant is not school-based;
rather, it is a portable grant for which preliminary eligibility can,
and should, be determined before the participant enrolls in a
particular school or training program. The application for determining
eligibility and ultimately the amount of the grant, should be readily
available at all One-Stop centers for assistance in the completion of
these ``gateway'' financial aid applications.
Section 663.320(c) implements the requirements of WIA section
134(d)(4)(B)(ii). This section permits a WIA participant to enroll in a
training program with WIA funds while an application for Pell Grant
funds is pending, but requires that the local workforce investment area
be reimbursed for the amount of the Pell Grant used for training if the
application is approved. Since Pell Grants are intended to provide for
both tuition and other education-related costs, the Rule also clarifies
that only the portion provided for tuition is subject to reimbursement.
In the limited cases where contracts are used rather than ITA's,
the contracts negotiated by the One-Stop center must prohibit training
institutions or
[[Page 18673]]
organizations from holding the student liable for outstanding charges.
Otherwise, the performance agreements would be undercut because the
incentive for the institution or organization to perform would be
removed. Also, the practice of withholding Pell Grants from students is
prohibited by the U.S. Department of Education.
Subpart D--Individual Training Accounts
1. Definition of an Individual Training Account: Information
regarding Individual Training Accounts (ITA) is contained in
Secs. 663.400 through 663.430. A key reform tenet of the Workforce
Investment Act is that adults and dislocated workers who have been
determined to need training, may access training with an Individual
Training Account. The regulation at Sec. 663.410 provides a definition
for an ITA that seeks to provide maximum flexibility to State and local
program operators in managing ITA's. These regulations do not establish
the procedures for making payments, restrictions on the duration or
amounts of the ITA, or policies regarding exceptions to the limits, but
provide that authority to the State or Local Boards. However, this
authority to restrict the duration of ITA's or restrict funding amounts
should not be used to establish limits that arbitrarily exclude
eligible providers.
2. Exceptions to ITA's: The Act at section 134(d)(4)(G)(ii) and
Sec. 663.430 of the regulations provide that, under certain limited
circumstances, contracts for training rather than ITA's may be used.
Specifically, on-the-job training contracts with employers and
customized training contracts are authorized. Contracts may also be
used when there is an insufficient number of eligible providers in a
local area. This exception applies primarily to rural areas. The
exceptions to ITA's are to be used infrequently. The Act reforms the
local service delivery system by eliminating the current practice of
assigning participants to contracted training services and instead
establishing a system that maximizes customer choice in the selection
of training providers. When the Local Board determines there are an
insufficient number of eligible providers in the local area to
accomplish the purposes of a system of ITA's, and intends to use
contracts for services, there must be at least a 30 day public comment
period for interested providers.
Contracts for Special Populations--Contracts for training are also
authorized when the Local Board determines that there are special
populations that face multiple barriers to employment, as identified in
Sec. 663.430(b), and that there is a training services program of
demonstrated effectiveness offered by an eligible provider. Section
663.430(a)(3) explains that an eligible provider in this case is a
community based organization (CBO) or other private organization. The
Department has received many suggestions about this exception and the
extent to which it may be used. This exception is intended to meet
special needs and should be used infrequently. Those training providers
operating under the ITA exceptions still must qualify as eligible
providers, as required at Sec. 663.505. The Department believes that
effective eligible training providers, including CBO's and other
training providers, can and will compete for individual training
accounts and, that providers should view the use of ITA's as an
opportunity to expand their customer base.
Criteria for ``Demonstrated Effectiveness''--The regulation at
Sec. 663.430(a)(3) provides that when the exception for special
populations is used, the Local Board must apply criteria it develops to
determine ``demonstrated effectiveness,'' particularly as it applies to
the special participant population it proposes to serve. This
determination is in addition to meeting the requirements for qualifying
as an eligible training provider. The provisions in the regulation are
illustrative and Local Boards should develop specific criteria
applicable to their local areas.
Subpart E--Eligible Training Providers
1. Subpart E describes the methods by which organizations qualify
as eligible providers of training services under WIA. It also describes
the roles and responsibilities of Local Boards and the State in
managing this process. Although no single entity has full
responsibility for the entire process, the State must play a leadership
role in ensuring the success of the eligible provider system. The
Governor establishes minimum performance levels for initial
determination of non-Higher Education Act/registered apprenticeship
providers and for all subsequent eligibility determinations. The Local
Board may establish additional local performance levels for subsequent
eligibility determinations. The eligible provider process requires a
collaborative effort among the State, Local Boards, and other partners.
The regulations attempt to amplify and clarify the intent of the Act,
by linking statutory language on eligible providers in WIA section 122
with section 134 provisions covering Individual Training Accounts. In
Sec. 663.505, the regulations clarify that all training providers,
including those operating under the ITA exceptions, must qualify as
eligible providers, except for those engaged in on-the-job and
customized training (for which the Governor should establish qualifying
procedures as discussed in Sec. 663.595). Finally, in order to ensure
the strong relationship between the eligible provider process and
program performance, the regulation at Sec. 663.530 establishes a
maximum eighteen month period for an organization's initial
determination as an eligible provider.
The Department heard concern that some traditional providers of
training under previous workforce programs, such as community-based
organizations, would face difficulties in participating in this system.
The regulations clarify that such organizations have the opportunity to
deliver training funded under WIA, provided they deliver services that
customers value and meet training performance requirements. It is
important that States provide access to these organizations in order to
maximize customer choice. States should provide access to a broad and
diverse set of providers, including CBO's, while maintaining the
quality and integrity of training services.
Subpart F--Priority and Special Populations
1. Priority Under Limited Adult Funding: This subpart contains
requirements related to the statutorily-required priority for the use
of adult funds when funds are limited. WIA section 134(d)(4)(E) states
that in the event that funds allocated to a local area for adult
employment and training activities are limited, priority shall be given
to recipients of public assistance and other low-income individuals for
intensive services and training services. The appropriate Local Board
and the Governor must direct the One-Stop operators in the local area
with regard to making determinations related to such priority. The
Department assumes that adult funding is generally limited because
there are not enough adult funds available to provide services to all
of the adults who could benefit from such services. However, the
Department also recognizes that conditions are different from one area
to another and funds might not be limited in all areas. Because of
this, the regulation requires that all Local Boards must consider the
availability of funds in their area. In making this determination, the
availability of other Federal funding, such as TANF and Welfare-to-Work
[[Page 18674]]
funds, should be taken into consideration. Unless the Local Board
determines that funds are not limited in the local area, the priority
requirement will be in effect. States and Local Boards must work
together to establish the criteria that must be used in making this
determination. States and Local Boards also may administer their
priority for adult recipients of public assistance and other low income
adults so as not to preclude providing intensive and training services
to other individuals.
A substantial number of parties expressed views on the priority
issue. Many believed that the Department should not write any
regulations that would, in effect, establish a nationwide priority.
Some believed that the Department should not write any regulations at
all on this section of the statute. However, the Department believes
that the interpretation of this requirement is of such importance that
there must be regulations. This section reiterates the statutory
language that provides States and Local Boards with the authority to
determine the criteria to be applied when making the determination that
there are sufficient funds available so that the priority is not in
effect. Section 663.610 clarifies that the statutory priority only
applies to adult funds for intensive and training services, and not to
dislocated worker funds.
2. Welfare-to-Work and Temporary Assistance to Needy Families as
Part of One-Stop: At Sec. 663.620, the regulation discusses the
relationship of the Welfare-to-Work program and the Temporary
Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) program to the One-Stop delivery
system. Welfare-to-Work is a required partner to which the One-Stop
partner regulations apply. The TANF agency is specifically suggested as
an additional partner. Both programs can benefit from close cooperation
with the One-Stop delivery system because their respective participants
will have access to a much broader range of services to promote
employment retention and self-sufficiency.
Subpart G--On-the-Job Training and Customized Training
1. Sections 663.700 through 663.720 are the regulatory provisions
for conducting on-the-job (OJT) and customized training activities.
They include specific information regarding general, contract, and
employer payment requirements. The Department received input advocating
OJT regulations which do not restrict the duration of OJT and which
permit eligible employed workers to also receive this training. Unlike
JTPA, OJT is not limited to six months. However, as specified in WIA
section 101(31)(C), it is limited in duration as appropriate for the
occupation being trained for. Section 663.705 establishes requirements
that permit OJT contracts for employed workers.
Some parties called for minimal regulations in this area; however,
there were a few who suggested the need for information regarding
documentation requirements to avoid audit exceptions. Section 663.710
provides that employers are not required to document the extraordinary
costs associated with providing OJT, and no further documentation
requirements are established. Instead, program operators should put
emphasis on the development and/or selection of OJT assignments that
meet the identified needs of the participants.
Subpart H--Supportive Services
1. Flexibility in the Provision of Supportive Services: The
regulations in subpart H define the scope and purpose of supportive
services and the requirements governing their disbursement. A
fundamental principle of WIA is to provide local areas with the
authority to make policy and administrative decisions as well as the
flexibility to tailor the workforce investment system to meet the needs
of the local community. To ensure this flexibility, the regulations
afford local areas the discretion to provide supportive services as
they deem appropriate with limitations only in the areas defined in the
Act. Local Boards are required to develop policies and procedures
addressing coordination with other entities to ensure non-duplication
of resources and services, as well as any limits on the amount and
duration of such services. Attention should be given to developing
policies and procedures that ensure that the supportive services
provided are not available through other agencies and that they are
necessary for the individual to participate in title I activities.
2. Needs-Related Payments: There were a number of issues regarding
the eligibility requirements for dislocated workers to receive needs-
related payments that came to our attention, including the concern that
training enrollment requirements restrict the numbers of individuals
eligible to receive this income support which they need to participate
in training. Studies show that early entry into training for dislocated
workers who require it is a key factor in reducing the period of
unemployment during the adjustment process. Early intervention
strategies and policies are best implemented through quality rapid
response assistance which includes comprehensive core services, and the
provision of other reemployment assistance, including intensive and
training services, as soon as the need can be identified, preferably
before layoff. The statute authorizes all levels of assistance under
title I of WIA to many workers six months (180 days) before layoff, or
at least as soon as a layoff notice is received. Providing these
workers with access to quality information regarding all adjustment
assistance available in the community, including any deadlines that
must be met, is critical for workers to make intelligent reemployment
choices. Thus, many of the concerns raised can be resolved through the
use of early intervention strategies. The Department has decided to
issue only limited regulations on needs-related payments eligibility at
Sec. 663.815 through Sec. 663.840.
Part 664--Youth Activities Under Title I
Introduction
The youth regulations attempt to reflect the intent of the
legislation by moving away from one-time, short-term interventions and
moving to a systematic approach that offers youth a broad range of
coordinated services. Such offerings include opportunities for
assistance in both academic and occupational learning; developing
leadership skills; and preparing for further education, additional
training, and eventual employment. Rather than supporting separate,
categorical programs, the youth regulations are written to facilitate
the provision of a menu of varied services that may be provided in
combination or alone at different times during a youth's development.
Legislation creating the youth council, the local entity
responsible for recommending and coordinating youth policies and
programs, intends that the youth council be a catalyst for such broad
change. The regulations support that legislative intent.
Flexibility for local program operators in conducting youth
programs is key to the legislation and these regulations. The
Department encourages local decision making in terms of policy, youth
program design within the statutory framework, and determining
appropriate program offerings for each individual youth. It is the
Department's expectation that these offerings will provide needed
guidance for youth that is balanced with appropriate
[[Page 18675]]
consideration of each youth's involvement in his or her training and
educational plan. Further, the regulations support strong connections
between youth program activities and the One-Stop service delivery
system, so that youth learn early in their development how to access
the services of the One-Stop system and continue to use those services
throughout their working lives.
Subpart A--Youth Councils
1. This subpart explains the purpose of youth councils. The youth
council is a new feature of the workforce investment system that helps
develop youth employment and training policy, brings a youth
development perspective to the establishment of such policy,
establishes linkages with other local youth services organizations, and
takes into account a range of issues that can have an impact on the
success of youth in the labor market. Working with the youth council,
the Local Board has responsibility for oversight of youth programs. It
may be advantageous for Local Boards to delegate responsibility for
oversight of youth programs to youth councils which have expertise in
youth issues, as is permitted by Sec. 664.110.
Subpart B--Eligibility for Youth Services
1. Definition of Sixth Eligibility Barrier: Under section
101(13)(C)(vi) of the Act, a low income youth is eligible for services
if he or she ``requires additional assistance to complete an
educational program, or to secure and hold employment.'' The regulation
at Sec. 664.210 envisions that Local Boards will define this term,
however, if State policy is set regarding this provision, the policy
must be described in the State Plan.
2. Registering Youth Participants: Section 664.215 provides that
all youth participants be registered by collecting information for
supporting eligibility determinations, as well as EEO data. The EEO
data must be collected on individuals when any assessment or
discretionary decision regarding an individual is made. Such
assessments include decisions regarding service or program eligibility,
either positive or negative, and decisions made on the part of any
workforce investment system employee which lead to a targeting of
services for the individual. The Department will issue further guidance
regarding this data collection requirement.
3. Non-Income Eligible Youth: Section 129(c)(5) of the Act provides
that up to five percent of youth participants served in a local area
may be individuals who do not meet income criteria for eligible youth,
provided that they meet one or more of the criteria specified in
section 129(c)(5) of the Act and the regulations at Sec. 664.220. Local
Boards may define the term ``serious barriers to employment'' and
describe it in the Local Plan.
4. Eligibility under the National School Lunch Program: Eligibility
for free school lunches is not a substitute for income eligibility
under the Act. The Department received suggestions that program
operators be allowed to use eligibility for free lunch as a substitute
for determining eligibility under the Act, and encouraging the
Department to seek a technical amendment that would include such a
provision in the legislation. The Department recognizes the importance
of this issue, yet lacks statutory authority to change the Act's income
eligibility requirements.
5. Eligibility of Youth with Disabilities: Section 664.250 provides
that a disabled individual whose family income exceeds maximum income
levels under the Act may qualify for services if the individual's own
income meets the income criteria established in WIA section 101(25)(F),
or the eligibility criteria for cash payments under any Federal, State
or Local public assistance program. (WIA section 101(25)(B).)
Subpart C--Out of School Youth
1. Defining Out-of-School Youth: Sections 664.300, 664.310, and
664.320 address issues related to out-of-school youth. Section 101(33)
of the Act defines ``out-of-school youth'' as: eligible youth who are
school dropouts or who have received a secondary school diploma or its
equivalent, but are basic skills deficient, unemployed, or
underemployed. Youth enrolled in alternative schools are not school
dropouts. The Department received a number of requests that it seek a
technical amendment that would allow youth attending alternative
schools to be included in the definition of ``dropout,'' noting that
this would permit Local Boards to provide services to more youth in
alternative educational environments and to design programs that take
advantage of local resources and best meet the needs of local youth.
While recognizing the importance of local flexibility and of serving
youth in alternative school settings, the Department lacks statutory
authority to change definitions established under the Act. Section
664.310 of the regulations clarifies this issue.
2. Funds for Summer Activities for Out-of-School Youth: The
Department received a number of inquiries asking if summer activities
are exempt from the requirement that 30 percent of youth funds be spent
on services for out-of-school youth. Transition guidance will address
how the 30% requirement applies to the Program Year 1999 JTPA summer
funds. Section 664.320 clarifies that there is no exemption from this
requirement for summer activities. There is no separate summer program
under the Act. A single allocation of youth funds is available to local
areas for year-round and summer activities. Thirty percent of the total
youth allocation must be spent on services for out-of-school youth.
This 30 percent, like the remaining 70 percent, may or may not be
proportional between summer and year-round activities, as determined by
the Local Board in consultation with the chief elected official.
Subpart D--Youth Program Design, Elements, and Parameters
1. Program Design: Features of the youth program design are
outlined in section 129(c) of the Act. While there are three program
design categories and ten program elements are required, there is
individual program design flexibility and flexibility in determining
the definition, scope, and characteristics of the elements.
Program Design Categories--Under section 129(c)(1), three
categories provide the framework for youth program design. They are:
(1) An objective assessment of each participant; (2) individual service
strategies; and (3) services that prepare youth for postsecondary
educational opportunities, link academic and occupational learning,
prepare youth for employment, and provide connections to intermediary
organizations linked to the job market and employers.
Linkages to Entities--Youth councils and programs are required to
establish linkages to entities that will foster the participation of
eligible youth. Suggested linkages are included in Sec. 664.400(c).
Information and Referrals--Section 129(c)(3) of the Act requires
that Local Boards ensure that eligible youth receive information and
referrals, including information on the full array of appropriate
services available to them and referrals to appropriate training and
educational programs. Youth program providers must ensure that eligible
applicants who do not meet the enrollment requirements of their program
or who cannot be served by their program are referred for additional
assessment and program placement. This language was included in
Sec. 664.400(d) of the regulations to emphasize the importance of
referrals as
[[Page 18676]]
a part of overall youth program design. To further promote the concept
of seamless One-Stop service delivery, One-Stop operators are
encouraged to send those youth assessments that are completed at the
One-Stop center to other training and educational programs to which the
youth is referred.
2. Program elements: Section 129(c)(2) of the Act lists 10 program
elements that must be generally available to youth through local
programs. The Department received requests for clarification that not
all of the 10 youth program elements must be provided to every youth
participant, and this interpretation is included in Sec. 664.410(b).
Local program operators must determine what program elements will be
provided to each youth participant based on the participant's objective
assessment and service strategy; however, it is envisioned that each
youth will participate in more than one of the ten program elements
required as part of any local youth program, and all youth must receive
follow-up services. For example, even if it is determined appropriate
that a youth participate in only summer employment activities, he or
she would still receive at least 12 months of followup services.
Followup service requirements are fully described in Sec. 664.450.
Sections 664.420 through 664.470 further define and discuss five
program elements: leadership development, positive social behaviors,
supportive services, followup services, and work experiences.
Leadership Development--The Act states that youth programs must
provide leadership development opportunities, and gives the following
examples of such activities: community service and peer-centered
activities encouraging responsibility and other positive social
behaviors during non-school hours. Some additional examples of
leadership development activities are outlined in Sec. 664.420 which
elaborates on the definition of leadership development opportunities.
The development of leadership abilities might address team work,
decision making, personal responsibility, and citizenship training, as
well positive social behavior training in areas such as positive
attitudinal development, self esteem building, issues of cultural
diversity, and other skills and attributes that would help youth to
lead effectively, responsibly, and by example.
Supportive Services--The Act states that youth programs must
provide supportive services. Section 101(46) of the Act defines
supportive services to include services such as transportation, child
care, dependent care, housing, and needs-related payments, that are
necessary to participate in activities authorized under the Act.
Section 664.440 elaborates on the definition of supportive services as
it applies to youth. Such services may include: linkages to community
services; referrals to medical services; and assistance with work
attire and work-related tool costs, including such items as eye glasses
and protective eye gear.
Followup Services--The Act states that followup services will be
provided for not less than 12 months after the completion of
participation, as appropriate. Section 664.450(b) clarifies that all
youth participants must receive some form of followup services. Such
services must be for a minimum of 12 months. Followup services for
youth who participate in only summer employment activities may,
however, be less intensive than for those youth who participate in
other types of activities. Program operators are encouraged to consider
the intensity of the services provided and the needs of the individual
youth in determining the appropriate level of followup services. This
section also provides that followup may include leadership development
or supportive service activities, as well as other allowable
activities, and provides additional examples of permissible followup
services.
Evaluation studies such as Abt Associates' Final Report on the
National JTPA Study, have shown disappointing results for short-term
job training programs for youth. Meanwhile, programs such as STRIVE and
the Children's Village have shown much success with longer-term
followup strategies. A 1993 study by MDRC showed that the Center for
Employment Training, which features close ties to the private sector
and a strong job placement component with followup with employers,
increased the earnings of enrollees by $3,000 a year over a control
group during the last two years of a four-year evaluation.
Work Experiences--Sections 664.460 and 664.470 address work
experiences for youth. Work experiences are planned, structured
learning experiences that take place in a workplace for a limited
period of time. No specific time period is specified. As provided in
section 129(c)(2)(D) of the Act, work experiences may be paid or
unpaid, as appropriate. Section 664.460 states that work experiences
may be in the private for-profit sector, the nonprofit sector, or the
public sector, and gives examples of the types of activities that work
experiences may include, such as On-the-Job Training (OJT). While OJT
is likely not an appropriate activity for most youth under age 18, it
may be used as a service strategy for such youth based on the needs
identified in an objective assessment of an individual youth
participant. Section 664.470 provides that youth funds may be used to
pay the wages of youth in work experience. Youth funds may be used to
pay the wages of youth in work experiences, including in the private,
for-profit sector, under conditions designed to protect youth and
incumbent workers when the purpose of the work experiences is to
provide youth with opportunities for career exploration and skill
development and not to benefit the employer. If an unpaid work
experience creates an employer/employee relationship, federal wage
standards may apply. This relationship is determined under the Fair
Labor Standards Act.
Subpart E--Concurrent Enrollment
1. Concurrent Enrollment in Youth and Adult Programs: Under the
Act, an eligible youth is an individual 14 through 21 years of age.
Adults are defined in the Act as individuals age 18 and older. The
Department received suggestions that local program operators be allowed
to decide whether youth or adult services are appropriate for
individuals aged 18 through 21 based on individual participant
assessments and service strategies. The Department encourages local
flexibility in serving both youth and adult participants, and thus
included this clarification in the regulations. Section 664.500(b)
clarifies that eligible youth who are 18 through 21 years old may
participate in youth and adult programs concurrently, as appropriate
for the individual. Such individuals must meet the eligibility
requirements under the applicable youth or adult criteria for the
services received. Local program operators must identify and track the
funding streams for services provided to individuals who participate in
youth and adult programs concurrently, ensuring non-duplication of
services.
2. Individual Training Accounts for Youth: Section 664.510 states
that ITA's are not an authorized use of youth funds. The ITA is the
currency of a market-based system that enables adults to select the
service providers most suited to their needs based on information about
the past performance of such providers. Under the Act, ITA's are not
authorized for youth below age 18. Providers of youth services are
competitively selected based on predetermined criteria, the judgment of
Local Boards, and recommendations of youth councils about the
providers' ability to meet the needs of youth
[[Page 18677]]
participants. Youth aged 18 through 21 can access ITA's under the adult
or dislocated worker program, if appropriate.
Subpart F--Summer Employment Opportunities
1. Summer Employment Activities: This subpart provides
clarification about summer youth employment. Although all Local Boards
must offer summer employment opportunities for eligible youth as one of
the ten required program elements listed in WIA section 129(c)(2) and
Sec. 664.410, the proportion of youth funds used for summer employment
is determined by the Local Board in consultation with the chief elected
official. Section 664.600 elaborates on the activities that must be
included in all summer employment opportunities, including direct
linkages to academic and occupational learning, as well as followup
services for at least 12 months. Numerous inquiries were received about
whether the Act would allow cities and counties to continue to operate
their summer activities. Section 664.610 provides that this practice is
still allowed, and clarifies that if summer employment opportunities
are provided by entities other than the grant recipient/fiscal agent,
the providers must be selected by awarding a grant or contract on a
competitive basis based on recommendations of the youth council and on
criteria contained in the State plan.
2. Application of Performance Indicators: In terms of performance
measurement, the Department received requests for clarification on
whether all of the core indicators listed in the Act apply to the
summer program element as well as to youth activities that are longer
in duration. It is important to note that the core indicators specified
in section 136 of the Act apply to all youth program activities. This
is consistent with the intent of the Act to move from a focus on
separate, categorical programs to a more systematic approach to
workforce investment and serving the needs of youth. Summer employment
opportunities then, are to be viewed as one element among many
available to youth as a part of a menu of activities offered by the
Local Board. Section 664.620 indicates that summer activities, as part
of the overall youth program, are required to meet the same core
indicators of performance as the other youth activities.
Subpart G--One-Stop Career Center Services to Youth
1. The Connection between the Title I Youth Program and the One-
Stop Delivery System: This subpart explains that the chief elected
official (as the local grant recipient for the youth program), as a
required One-Stop partner, is subject to the One-Stop provisions
related to such partners described in part 662 of the regulations and
is responsible for connecting the youth program and its activities to
the One-Stop system. In addition to the provisions of part 662,
connections between the youth program and the One-Stop system may
include those that facilitate:
The coordination of youth activities;
Connections to the job market and employers;
Access for eligible youth to information and services; and
Other activities designed to achieve the purposes of the
youth program.
The Department received requests for clarification on connecting
youth program activities to the One-Stop delivery system; however, some
parties felt that the youth program, as a One-Stop partner, should not
be made to conform to the same One-Stop partner requirements as other
partners. The Rule attempts to clarify the role of the youth program in
the One-Stop center through a cross-reference to the One-Stop
regulations found in 20 CFR, part 662.
2. Universal Access to One-Stop Centers for Youth under 18: Under
section 134(d)(2) of the Act, adults have access to core services in
One-Stop centers without regard to eligibility. Adults are defined
under the Act as persons aged 18 and above. Section 664.710 of the
regulations clarifies that local area youth, including youth under age
18 who are not eligible under the title I youth program, may receive
services through the One-Stop centers; however, services for such youth
must be funded from sources that do not restrict eligibility for
services, such as Wagner-Peyser. The Department believes that the
intent of the Act is to introduce youth, particularly out-of-school
youth, to the services of the One-Stop system early in their
development and to encourage the use of the One-Stop system as an entry
point to obtaining education, training, and job search services.
Subpart H--Youth Opportunity Grant Programs
This subpart explains that competitive procedures for awarding
Youth Opportunity Grants will be established by the Secretary. It also
restates statutory language regarding the eligibility of Local Boards
and other entities in high poverty areas to apply for Youth Opportunity
Grants. Provisions of the Act regarding eligibility for services under
Youth Opportunity Grants and the process for establishing performance
measures are clarified at Secs. 664.800 to 664.830. The Department
views these grants as a distinct opportunity to provide a variety of
needed services to youth in high poverty areas, building on the current
successful activities and innovations already at work in many
communities.
Part 665--Statewide Activities Under Title I of the Workforce
Investment Act
Introduction
This part addresses the funds reserved at the State level for
workforce investment activities under sections 128(a) and 133(2) of
WIA.
Subpart A--General Description
This subpart provides a general description of Statewide activities
conducted with up to 15 percent reserved from youth, adult and
dislocated worker funding streams (``15 percent funds''), and up to an
additional 25 percent of dislocated worker funds reserved for Statewide
activities from annual allotments to the State.
1. Section 665.110(b) explains that the 15 percent reserved funds
may be pooled and expended on workforce investment activities without
regard to the source of the funding. For example, funds reserved from
the adult funding stream may be used to carry out Statewide youth
activities and vice versa. The Department believes that the use of
these funds can provide critical leadership in the development and
continuous improvement of a comprehensive workforce investment system
for each State and, as a result, create a national system to which job
seekers and workers can look for expert assistance, and employers can
look for a qualified workforce.
Subpart B--Required and Allowable Statewide Workforce Investment
Activities
This subpart discusses required and optional activities conducted
with funds reserved from the three title I funding streams (youth,
adults, and dislocated workers).
1. Required Activities: Section 665.200 identifies the eight
activities which each State is required to carry out with its reserved
funds from the three funding streams. The Governor must reserve funding
for these activities, but has discretion to determine the amount
reserved, up to the maximum 15 percent of each funding stream. One use
of these funds is administration, subject to the five percent
administrative cost
[[Page 18678]]
limitation at 20 CFR 667.210(a)(1). This section clarifies that while
there is no specific amount for each of the seven of the eight required
activities to be carried out with the 15 percent funds, it is expected
that the State will expend a sufficient amount to ensure effective
implementation of those activities. The eighth required activity, rapid
response, is discussed in subpart C.
2. Optional Activities: Section 665.210 also identifies activities
which each State is allowed to carry out with the 15 percent funds. For
the first time, States have the discretion to conduct research and
demonstration projects, and incumbent worker projects, including the
establishment and implementation of an employer loan program. Section
665.220 makes clear that employed (incumbent) workers served under
projects funded with these reserve funds are not required to meet the
requirements that training is needed to lead to a self-sufficient wage
applicable to employed adult or dislocated workers served with local
formula funds.
Subpart C--Rapid Response Activities
This subpart addresses the use of funds that must be reserved (up
to 25 percent of dislocated worker funds allotted to States under
section 132(b)(2)(B) of WIA) to provide rapid response assistance.
1. Section 665.300 describes what are rapid response activities and
who is responsible for providing them. Rapid response assistance
commences at the site of dislocation as soon as a State has received a
WARN notice, a public announcement or other information that a mass
dislocation or plant closure is scheduled to take place. The Department
believes that this early intervention feature for dislocated workers,
if provided in a comprehensive and systematic manner through
collaboration between the State and Local Boards, One-Stop partners and
other applicable entities, is critical to enabling workers to minimize
the duration of unemployment following layoff. The Department strongly
urges States and Local Boards to implement processes that allow for
core services to be an integral part of rapid response assistance,
preferably on-site, if the size of the dislocation or other factors
warrant it. Further, WIA defines a dislocated worker at section 101(9)
in a way that permits formula funds to be used for intensive and
training services for workers: (1) As soon as they have layoff notices;
or (2) six months (180 days) prior to layoff if employed at a facility
that has made a general announcement that it will close within 180
days.
The Department believes that this is a critical period for workers,
States, Local Boards, One-Stop operators and partners to begin to make
important decisions. One important decision is whether there are
sufficient formula funds in the State (at the State or local levels) to
adequately serve the workers being dislocated, or whether national
emergency grant funds must be requested in a timely manner so that all
services are available to the workers when they need them.
2. In response to numerous concerns regarding whether rapid
response funds may be used beyond those types of required rapid
response assistance described in the Act and Sec. 665.310, the
Department has elaborated on the authorized rapid response activities
in the regulation at Sec. 665.320. These additional activities were
recommended by experts consulted on this topic.
3. Section 665.330 addresses the linkage of rapid response
assistance and WIA title I assistance to NAFTA-Transitional Adjustment
Assistance (NAFTA-TAA). This linkage is an important feature of the
One-Stop delivery system, and a requirement under NAFTA-TAA.
Part 666--Performance Accountability Under Title I of the Workforce
Investment Act
Introduction
This part presents the performance accountability requirements
under title I of the Act. This part of the regulations primarily
summarizes the statutory language in the Act and clarifies a few key
areas based on input the Department has received. WIA's purpose is to
provide workforce investment activities that improve the quality of the
workforce. The Department is strongly committed to a systemwide
continuous improvement approach, grounded upon proven quality
principles and practices. The regulations identify some of the major
issues where further guidance will be provided.
Subpart A--State Measures of Performance
1. Indicators: Section 666.100 identifies the 15 core indicators of
performance and the two customer satisfaction indicators that States
are required to address in title I grant applications. The 15 core
indicators represent the four core indicators that will be applied
separately for the three population categories (adult, dislocated
workers and eligible youth age 19 through 21) for a total of 12
indicators and the three youth indicators. There is one customer
satisfaction indicator for participants and one for employers. Section
666.110 clarifies that Governors may develop additional performance
indicators to be negotiated with Local Boards and that these additional
indicators must be included in the State Plan.
2. Definitions: Section 666.100(b) also explains that the
Departments of Labor and Education will issue more detailed definitions
for the title I and title II indicators after further consultation with
representatives identified in section 502(b) of WIA. The Departments
will consult further on the indicator definitions, including taking
into account factors such as the degree of difficulty and expense of
collecting data and reporting on the measures.
3. Negotiations: As noted at Sec. 666.120(a), the Department will
provide further guidance on each of these areas after additional
consultation. Section 666.120(b) addresses the requirement that States
must submit expected or proposed levels of performance for the core
indicators and customer satisfaction indicators for years one through
three of the State Plan. The Department may require States to express
levels of improvement as a percentage improvement over the previous
year's actual performance. The Department recognizes that continuous
improvement is more than incremental increases in performance and will
develop a comprehensive and rigorous approach to integrate continuous
improvement at all levels of the workforce investment system. The
Department received input that underscored this need to view continuous
improvement as a system building activity, not a compliance activity.
4. Participants Included in Measures: The Department was requested
to clarify when a customer becomes a participant for the purpose of
applying the core indicators of performance. Section 666.140 explains
that all individuals, except for those adults and dislocated workers
who receive services that are self-service or primarily informational,
must be registered and included in the core indicators of performance.
The Department will issue guidance to further specify which activities
and services require registration and which ones do not. In addition,
Sec. 666.140(b) implements the requirement that a standardized record
must be completed for registered participants.
5. Wage Record Data. Section 136(f)(2) of the Act requires States
to use quarterly wage records, consistent with State law, to measure
progress on the core indicators of performance. Section
[[Page 18679]]
666.150 clarifies that each State must describe its strategy for using
quarterly wage record data for performance measurement in the State
Plan. The State Plan must also identify the entities that may have
access to the wage record data for this purpose. In addition,
Sec. 666.150(c) defines ``quarterly wage record information'' (1) as
wages paid to an individual, (2) the individual's social security
number (or numbers if more than one), (3) the employer's name, address,
State where located, and (4) the Federal employer identification number
(when known). As requested, the Department will continue to explore the
implications and provide guidance for complying with the
confidentiality requirements at section 444 of the General Education
Act (20 U.S.C. 1232g (as added by the Family Educational Rights and
Privacy Act of 1974). Furthermore, the Department will continue to take
into account concerns about possible violations of State unemployment
compensation laws, confidentiality and privacy statutes and wage record
collection systems. The Department will issue further guidance about
the use of quarterly wage records.
Subpart B--Incentives and Sanctions for State Performance
1. Criteria: Section 666.200 restates the eligibility criteria for
States to apply for an incentive grant. Section 666.210 addresses the
use of incentive funds for one or more innovative programs consistent
with requirements of title I of WIA, title II of WIA and the Carl D.
Perkins Vocational and Applied Technology Education Act.
2. Timing: There were suggestions that the Department postpone the
incentive program until a State's second year progress report is
received. Additional time has also been requested to enable the
workforce investment system to have a year of performance information
to assist in establishing baseline levels and to learn more about using
the unemployment compensation wage records for performance measurement
and about the data and reporting systems for title II Adult Education
and Literacy programs and Carl D. Perkins programs. The Department
recognizes these concerns and is considering available options. The
regulations do not address the timing issue.
3. Awards: Section 666.230 explains that the Secretary of Labor
will consult with the Secretary of Education and issue annual
instructions listing the amounts of incentive funds available to each
eligible State and giving application instructions. The list will be
developed after annual performance reports are received and will be
based on the reported performance. It also describes the factors that
will be taken into account in determining the amount of Incentive Grant
awards.
4. Sanctions: Section 666.240 explains that States failing to meet
for any program adjusted levels of performance for core indicators and
the customer satisfaction indicators for any program, in any year, will
receive technical assistance, if requested. If a State fails to meet
the required indicators for the same program for a second consecutive
year, the State may receive a reduction of as much as five percent of
the succeeding year's grant allocation.
Subpart C--Local Measures of Performance
Section 666.300 explains that each local workforce investment area
will be subject to the same 15 core performance indicators and two
customer satisfaction indicators that States are required to address.
Governors may elect to apply additional performance indicators to local
areas. Section 666.310 states that local performance levels will be
based on the State adjusted levels of performance and negotiated by the
Local Board and chief elected official and the Governor to account for
variations in local conditions.
Subpart D--Incentives and Sanctions for Local Performance
Section 666.400(a) restates local area eligibility for State
incentive grants. Section 666.400(b) states that the amount of funds
available for incentive grants and specific criteria to be used are
determined by the Governor. Section 666.420 also explains that local
areas failing to meet agreed upon levels of performance will receive
technical assistance for any program year. Governors must take
corrective actions for local areas failing to meet the required
indicators for two consecutive years.
Part 667 Administration Provisions
Introduction
This part establishes administrative provisions which apply to WIA
programs conducted at the Federal, State and local levels. These
regulations are written to clarify what was written in the Act and to
assemble all of the administrative requirements from the various parts
of the Act and other applicable sources in order to facilitate the
administrative management of WIA programs.
Subpart A--Funding
This subpart addresses fund availability. Questions have been
raised about to reallotment and reallocation focused on procedures and
amounts. The regulation clarifies that the amount reserved for the
costs of administration is excluded from the calculation of unobligated
balances upon which reallotment/reallocation are to be based. The
regulation also emphasizes that any amount to be recaptured and the
reallotment/reallocation are to be separately determined for each of
the three funding streams. Thus, for example, it is possible that a
State may be subject to recapture of youth funds while receiving a
reallotment of adult funds. The Department will provide additional
guidance on these processes.
Subpart B--Administrative Rules, Costs and Limitations
1. Fiscal and Administrative Rules: This subpart specifies the
Rules applicable to WIA grants in the areas of fiscal and
administrative requirements, audit requirements, allowable cost/cost
principles, debarment and suspension, a drug-free workplace,
restrictions on lobbying, and nondiscrimination. This subpart also
addresses State and Local Board conflict of interest and program income
requirements, procurement contracts and fee-for-service use by
employers, nepotism, responsibility review for grant applicants, and
the Governor's prior approval authority in subtitle B programs. Section
667.170 sets forth the Department's authority to perform a
responsibility review of potential grant applicants. The Department may
review any information that has come to its attention as part of an
assessment of applicant's responsibility to administer Federal funds.
The responsibility tests include the items set forth in paragraphs
(a)(1) through (a)(14). In this section, the term ``include'' is used
as it is throughout the Interim Final Rule, to indicate an
illustrative, but not exhaustive list of examples.
2. Administrative Costs: Administrative Cost Limits: Section
667.210 restates the provision of the Act which set a State level
administrative cost limit of five percent of total funds allotted to
the State by the Department and a local administrative cost limit of
10% of funds allocated by the State to the local area. It also provides
that the cost limitation applicable to awards under subtitle D will be
specified in the grant agreement. In addition, this regulation includes
a provision which excludes from the administrative cost limitation
calculation the acquisition
[[Page 18680]]
costs of hardware and software used for tracking and monitoring
participants, and for collecting, storing and disseminating information
required as a core service under the Act.
Definition of Administrative Costs: Section 667.220 provides the
Department's definition of Administrative Costs. To comply with the
statutory requirement for consultation with the Governors in developing
this definition, the Department consulted with representatives of the
Governors and included both State and local stakeholders in the
discussion. In addition to the input received through the consultation,
the Department received suggestions related to the definition of
administrative costs in various forums and by direct communications
from a number of different sources. The key theme which emerged is that
the function and intended purpose of an activity should be used to
determine whether the costs associated with it should be charged to the
program or administrative cost category.
The Department received input regarding what to include and what to
exclude from the definition of administrative costs. There were
specific recommendations that costs of information technology and costs
associated with continuous improvement activities be excluded from the
administrative cost category. These suggestions helped the Department
as it framed the regulation which defines administrative costs.
The Department valued this consultation and carefully considered
all input and crafted its definition to incorporate this function-based
approach. The regulation enumerates those functions of State Boards,
Local Boards and boards of chief elected officials which are classified
as administrative and indicates that those costs and the costs of like
activities/functions performed by One-Stop operators are classified as
administrative costs. The regulation also includes additional cost
classification guidance to clarify areas where questions have arisen
concerning the allocation of costs between the program and
administrative categories. The regulation provides the system with the
flexibility needed to allocate costs to the program or administrative
cost category based on the purpose or nature of the activity or
function. As a result, the locus of responsibility and intended purpose
of the function, whether direct or indirect, determines the appropriate
cost category.
3. Prohibited Activities: Sections 667.260 through 270 address a
number of prohibited activities that are located in various sections of
the Act. The regulation clarifies the Department's interpretation that
the Act's prohibition on employment generating activities, economic
development and other similar activities does not apply when they are
directly related to training of eligible participants. It is not
intended that such activities must benefit individually identified
participants to be allowable, rather, such approaches as first source
hiring agreements that promise to benefit participants as a group would
suffice. The Rule includes a list of activities that may be provided as
allowable economic development or similar activities. This list is not
meant to be exclusive. There may be other activities of a similar
nature that are directly related to training for eligible individuals
that are permissible under WIA. In this section, the term include is
used, as it is throughout the Interim Final Rule, to indicate an
illustrative, but not exhaustive, list of examples. With respect to the
prohibition of WIA support of inducing relocation of a business, the
regulation provides a process for a preaward review to ensure that
funds are not spent in violation of the provision. Section 667.269
specifies where the procedures for resolution of violations of these
prohibitions, as well as the related sanctions and remedies, can be
found.
Sectarian Facilities: Section 667.266 restates the Act's
prohibition on the employment of participants in the construction,
operation, or maintenance of a facility that is used for sectarian
instruction or as a place of religious worship, and describes the Act's
limited exception to this prohibition.
4. Impairment of Collective Bargaining Agreements: Section 667.270
lists the safeguards that ensure that participants in WIA activities do
not displace other employees. These include the prohibition on
impairment of existing contracts for services or collective bargaining
agreements that is contained in WIA section 181(b)(2). When an
employment and training activity described in WIA section 134 would be
inconsistent with a collective bargaining agreement, the Rule requires
that the appropriate labor organization and employer provide written
concurrence before the activity begins.
5. Labor Protections: Section 667.272 requires that individuals
engaged in on-the-job training or employed in activities under Title I
of WIA must be paid at the same rate, including the same periodic wage
increases, as other workers who are similarly situated in similar
occupations by the same employer and who have similar training,
experience and skills. Wage rates must be in accordance with applicable
law, and must be at least equal to the rate specified in section
6(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA) (29 U.S.C.
206(a)(1)) or the applicable State or local minimum wage law, whichever
is higher. The determination of whether an individual is ``employed''
in a WIA activity for purposes of this provision, including
participation in paid or unpaid work experience, must be made in
accordance with the requirements of the FLSA. Questions regarding the
application of FLSA to participants in WIA activities should be
directed to the DOL, Employment Standards Administration, Wage and Hour
Division.
Section 677.274 mandates that all Federal and state health and
safety standards and state workers' compensation laws applicable to the
working conditions of similarly situated workers are equally applicable
to the working conditions of participants in programs and activities
under Title I of WIA. Paragraph (b)(2) clarifies the application state
workers' compensation laws to individuals engaged in work experience.
If a State workers' compensation law does not apply to a participant in
work experience, insurance coverage must be secured for injuries
suffered by the participant in the course of such work experience.
6. Nondiscrimination: Section 188 of the Act prohibits
discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age,
disability, religion, political affiliation or belief, participant
status, and against certain noncitizens. It also requires the Secretary
to issue regulations ``necessary to implement this section not later
than one year after the date on enactment'' of the Act. The Department
anticipates the publication of an Interim Final Rule to implement the
nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions of the Act prior to
July 1, 1999 (63 FR 62003, November 9, 1998). The Rule will be located
at 29 CFR part 37.
The provisions of WIA sec.188 are substantially similar to sec. 167
of JTPA, as amended. As a consequence, the Department anticipates
little difference between 29 CFR part 37 and the regulation
implementing sec. 167.
Section 667.275(a) provides that recipients must comply with the
nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions of the Act and its
implementing regulations. This provision is substantially similar to
that found in Sec. 627.210, the companion section of the regulations
implementing
[[Page 18681]]
the JTPA. A slight modification has been made to the language to
eliminate any possible confusion about who is covered by sec. 188. The
term recipient, as used in Sec. 671.275, has the same broad meaning as
that found in other civil rights regulations (for example, in 29 CFR
parts 31, 32, and 34), and that meaning will be carried over to 29 CFR
part 37. In the context of Sec. 667.275, a recipient is any entity that
receives funds under title I of the Act (except for the ultimate
beneficiary) whether the assistance comes directly from the Department,
through the Governor, or through another recipient. Some entities may
be identified as vendors or subrecipients, or some other term. However,
for the purpose of Sec. 667.275, these entities are considered
recipients and subject to section 188 and its implementing regulations.
Section 667.275 generally follows the language in Sec. 667.210, but
provides for the exception found in sec. 188(a)(3). This exception
allows for using funds under title I of WIA to employ participants in
maintenance of a part of a religious facility that is not primarily or
inherently devoted to sectarian instruction or religious worship, in a
case in which the organization operating the facility is part of a
program or activity providing services to participants.
Subpart C--Reporting Requirements
There were suggestions and questions related to the mechanics of
reporting. In response, Sec. 667.300 indicates that the Department will
issue instructions and formats for financial, participant and
performance reporting. We anticipate that reporting will be done
electronically. Section 667.300 also provides that a grantee may impose
different reporting requirements on its subrecipients including
different forms, shorter due dates, etc. When a State is the grantee
and plans to impose different reporting requirements, it must describe
them in its State Plan. Section 667.300(e), concerning the Annual
Performance Progress Report specifies the situations under which a
sanction, including a possible reduction in the subsequent year's grant
amount, may be imposed.
Subpart D--Oversight and Monitoring
This subpart includes regulations which provide for both Federal
and State oversight responsibilities. For formula grants, the
Department's monitoring of the States will be conducted primarily at
the State level and may include a sample of subrecipients. The
regulation emphasizes the requirement that States funded under this
program develop a Statewide monitoring system. States must be able to
demonstrate that the monitoring system meets certain regulatory
requirements. One way to so demonstrate is to make a monitoring plan
available for Federal review. The regulation which specifies the
oversight roles and responsibilities of WIA grant recipients and
subrecipients reflects the statutory language of sections 183 and 184
of the Act.
Subpart E--Resolution of Findings from Monitoring and Oversight
Reviews
1. Resolution of Findings and Grant Officer Resolution Process:
This subpart addresses the resolution of findings that arise from
audits, investigations, monitoring reviews, and the Grant Officer
resolution process. The processes are essentially the same as they were
under JTPA.
2. Nondiscrimination: To avoid confusion about which procedures
apply to nondiscrimination findings, the regulation specifies that
findings arising from investigations or reviews conducted under
nondiscrimination laws are to be resolved in accordance with section
188 of the Act and the applicable Department of Labor nondiscrimination
regulations. While 29 CFR part 34 is currently in effect, the
Department will issue a new 29 CFR part 37 to specifically implement
the provisions of section 188 of WIA. Therefore, States which do not
fully or partially implement WIA before July 1, 2000 will be subject to
the rules of 29 CFR, part 34 during PY 99. All States that implement
early, including those which implement under a transition plan, will be
subject to the new rules at 29 CFR, part 37, during PY 99.
Subpart F--Grievance Procedures, Complaints, and State Appeals
Processes
There were recommendations for and against the application of
grievance procedures to One-Stop partners not funded by the Department.
In response, the regulations allow such partners to file a grievance or
complaint when they are affected by the WIA system, but do not attempt
to address any grievance or complaint that might arise about their own
programs. Grievance procedures available in partners' programs are
those available under the law authorizing that program. A person who
believes that a partner may have violated WIA may use the grievance
procedure available under WIA.
1. Grievance Procedures: Section 667.600 describes those elements
required for local area, State and other direct recipient grievance
procedures. It also specifies that complaints of discrimination follow
the resolution process at sec. 188 and Department of Labor
nondiscrimination regulations. The regulation specifies the two
situations in which the Department will investigate and/or review
allegations that arise through local, State and other direct recipient
grievance procedures. In particular, as part of the State's
responsibilities, it must provide an opportunity for a timely review of
local level grievance adjudications.
2. Complaints and Appeals: Sections 667.630-650 address complaints
and reports of criminal activity, and the additional appeal processes
which a State must have for its WIA programs for nondesignation of
local areas, termination of eligibility or denial of training
providers, and testing and sanctions for use of controlled substances.
Subpart G--Sanctions, Corrective Actions, and Waiver of Liability
This subpart addresses sanctions and corrective actions, waiver of
liability, advance approval of contemplated corrective actions, as well
as the offset and State deduction provision.
Subpart H--Administrative Adjudication and Judicial Review
This subpart specifies those actions which may be appealed to the
Department's Office of Administrative Law Judge (OALJ), and the rules
of procedure and timing of decisions for OALJ hearings. Section 667.825
sets forth special requirements that apply to reviews of MSFW and INA
grant selections. These rules are similar to those currently in effect
under JTPA. Section 667.840 also provides for an alternate dispute
resolution process. In addition, Sec. 667.850 describes the authority
for judicial review of a final order of the Secretary.
Subpart I--Transition
Section 667.900 indicates that a Governor may reserve up to two
percent of Program Years 1998 and 1999 JTPA formula funds, of which not
less than 50% must be made available to local entities, for expenditure
on WIA transition planning activities. It specifies that the source of
funds may be any one or more of JTPA's titles or subtitles. It includes
a provision that expressly states the Department's position to exclude
funds so reserved from any calculation of compliance with JTPA cost
limitations. The Governor must decide to make the funds available to
one or more local entities. These might include a local JTPA entity, a
local entity established for the purpose
[[Page 18682]]
of operating WIA programs, or any other local entity. Additional
information and guidance on the process of transition will be
forthcoming.
Part 668--Indian and Native American Programs
Introduction
This part establishes the operation of employment and training
programs for Indians and Native Americans under the authority of
section 166 of the Act. This part is broken into subparts dealing with:
Purposes and policies; service delivery systems; customer services;
youth services; services to communities; grantee accountability;
planning and funding; administration; and miscellaneous provisions such
as waivers. In crafting the section 166 regulations, the Department
attempted to represent the program from the grantees' perspectives, and
to provide an organization which is relatively easy to follow and as
comprehensive as possible without repeating major sections of the
general WIA administrative regulations contained in part 667. Cross-
references to that part are provided in the body of these regulations,
when appropriate.
Need for Regulations
There are several reasons why these regulations exist separately,
and why they contain the areas regulated. The primary reason separate
regulations are drafted for the section 166 program is that it is
clearly the intent of Congress and the Administration that there be a
supplemental employment and training program under WIA solely for
Indians and Native Americans, with requirements, policies, and
procedures unique to that customer group. The current grantee community
stated a desire to have regulations which are as self-contained as
possible. Therefore, some material covered under the regulations
implementing the State workforce investment system is repeated in these
regulations, but usually not in the depth contained in part 667. Cross-
references direct the grantee to sections where greater detail is
provided.
Subject Areas Covered
The specific subject areas covered by these regulations, and cited
above, are being regulated because the language of section 166 does not
cover the detailed operation of the program. Statements of policy are
made to clearly delineate the Department's position with respect to the
section 166 program and the nature of the relationship between the
Department and its section 166 grantees. Areas such as those concerning
the designation of section 166 grantees must be regulated in order to
clarify the statutory provisions, and it is desirable to clearly define
these procedures and requirements for ease of compliance by those who
are or wish to be part of the system. The subparts in this Interim
Final Rule represent a logical sequence, from policies and purposes
through miscellaneous provisions, generally representing the reality of
program implementation as experienced by the typical grantee. This
sequence reflects grantee comments. The primary vehicle for soliciting
input on these regulations is the Native American Employment and
Training Council. Drafts of areas under consideration for regulation
were circulated to the grantee community by the Council, in their
statutorily-mandated advisory role. Input received from grantees came
either through the Council or directly to ETA's Division of Indian and
Native American Programs (DINAP), either in writing (including faxes),
orally (over the telephone), or via E-Mail. There were also discussion
sessions held at the three multi-regional meetings in Washington, DC,
Albuquerque, and Maui, as well as at the Advisory Council meeting in
November in Washington, DC. Each of these meetings generated
suggestions which were considered in crafting the present regulations.
Input was also received through individual members of the Work Group,
which is a body composed of Council members and other select grantee
program directors, and is an official Council subcommittee. All in all,
well over 50 parties submitted views on various aspects of the draft
regulations. The most significant input is synopsized below.
Areas Not Covered
Because a Final Rule will be effective for PY 2000, this Rule was
designed to address issues that affect grantees who implement in PY
1999. The Department will issue program direction and administrative
guidance to assist implementing grantees. These areas are as follows:
1. Transition to WIA: Although several sections allude to the
transition, no detailed instructions are included in this Rule. Because
this event will occur only once for each grantee, the Department
decided that the conversion from JTPA to WIA would be more
appropriately covered in administrative guidance to be completed and
distributed to grantees at a later date. This includes the closeout of
JTPA grants.
2. Public Law 102-477: A separate subpart was suggested to address
the various aspects of the demonstration under Pub. L. 102-477, The
Indian Employment, Training and Related Services Demonstration Act of
1992, including procedures for transitioning from a JTPA/WIA grantee to
a ``477 tribe.'' Because no separate regulations are authorized for the
demonstration, and participation is limited by law to Federally-
recognized tribes and Alaska Native entities, it was decided that such
a subpart would be inappropriate. However, Sec. 668.930 clearly states
that grantees who qualify may participate under Pub. L. 102-477. The
Department considers this to be an adequate reference for these
regulations.
3. Supplemental Youth Services: The Department believes that
establishing a separate subpart for youth services adequately covers
the provision of youth services for these regulations, but it
recognizes that further instruction in the creation and submission of
these youth plans will be necessary. In order to provide the
flexibility needed to adapt to these changes as they occur, the
Department believes it is appropriate at this time to provide policies
and procedures for the youth program in program guidance and policy
documents.
4. Performance Measures and Standards: While performance measures
and standards are referenced in Sec. 668.460 and Sec. 668.620, these
regulations do not specify which measures may or must be used, or how
accompanying performance standards will be derived. The development of
revised performance measures and levels for Native American employment
and training grantees has been on-going for several years under JTPA,
and will continue under WIA. This effort is considered to be on a
``separate track'' from the development of regulations, whether under
JTPA or WIA. When section 166 performance measures and standards are
finalized, they will be transmitted to the grantees in a separate
administrative issuance, and will not appear in regulations.
Subpart A--Purposes and Policies.
1. Self-determination: In Sec. 668.120, the Department clearly
commits to the principles of self-determination and sovereignty, and
names DINAP as the ``single organizational unit'' required in the Act
to administer section 166 programs. In addition to the language in the
Act, which the Department thought it appropriate to repeat by
paraphrasing, the Department has added a statement on helping customers
achieve personal and economic self-sufficiency. The Department
considers this statement to be one of the prime purposes of all
[[Page 18683]]
Federal employment and training efforts, and especially appropriate to
the Native American population.
2. Consultation: The operating principle of ``partnership'' is
embodied in these regulations at Sec. 668.130, which paraphrases
section 166 (h)(2) of the Act.
3. Definitions: These regulations do not repeat definitions covered
in the Act or in the main definitions section at Sec. 660.300. The term
``underemployed'' is defined in this section of the regulation because
it is not defined elsewhere, and the definition of ``family income'' is
specific to Indian and/or Alaska Native circumstances. The Department
has made clarifications to the definition of ``family income'' for
section 166 purposes. The regulations include a section from the Alaska
Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) (43 U.S.C. 1626(c)) concerning the
treatment of income for Alaska Natives which is applicable by law to
all Federally-funded programs.
4. Applicable Regulations: To create a more ``user friendly''
document, the Department added Sec. 668.140 to the Rule, which
describes what other regulations affect upon section 166 program
operation.
Subpart B--Service Delivery Systems
1. Designation: The current JTPA designation procedures,
eligibility requirements, competition hierarchies, etc., are retained
in this Interim Final Rule for PY 1999. WIA section 166 requires that
grantees be selected on a competitive basis except where a waiver of
competition is granted due to successful performance. The requirements
for the selection of grantees through the designation process are set
forth in Sec. 668.200--Sec. 668.280. In order to be selected as an INA
grantee, an entity must have legal status as a government or agency of
a government, a private non-profit corporation or a consortium
containing one of these groups; it must have the ability to administer
federal funds as determined under Sec. 668.220; and it must meet
certain eligible population requirements. To be consistent with the
goal of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act and
to provide Indians with the opportunity to achieve ``self-determination
essential to their social and economic well-being,'' the rule, at
Sec. 668.210, gives priority in the competitive designation process to
federally-recognized Indian tribes, Alaskan Native entities and
consortia of these entities. However, as part of the competitive
selection process, no entity may be designated as an INA grantee unless
it demonstrates that it has the ability to administer federal funds, as
defined in Sec. 668.220. The Department believes that this process is
consistent with the mandates of the Indian Self-Determination and
Education Assistance Act and with the requirement that grants,
contracts, and cooperative agreements be made on a competitive basis.
The Department is establishing a new designation threshold for PY
2000 and beyond in Sec. 668.200(b)(3), with allowances made for smaller
grantees wishing to participate in the demonstration under Pub. L. 102-
477. Also for PY 2000, the dates for submission of the Notice of Intent
and any additional required supporting documentation, contained in
Secs. 668.240 and 668 .250, are different from those for PY 1999,
primarily to allow both applicants and the Department more time to
implement the designation process, especially in the event of more than
one applicant competing for a given service area. An area of frequent
comment involved the current JTPA criteria for designation as a Native
American grantee, specifically the issues of size and the competition
hierarchy. Most of the suggestions received were from smaller
Federally-recognized tribes, either without the currently required
1,000 Indian or Native American population in their service area or
without a significant reservation land base from which to claim a
Hierarchy 1 preference. There were suggestions that the Department
abandon the numbers altogether, and instead assign a dollar threshold
which would be a better indication of grantee viability. For the PY
2000 designation and beyond, the Department has chosen $100,000 as the
minimum funding threshold. This includes any supplemental youth
services funds awarded to the grantee. In response to requests from
some smaller grantees, the Department has included in
Sec. 668.200(b)(3) a statement ``grandfathering in'' those current
grantees which do not meet the $100,000 threshold for PY 2000 and
beyond. Also in response to suggestions received from some smaller,
non-JTPA tribes wishing to participate in the demonstration under Pub.
L. 102-477, the Department made the $100,000 limit applicable to total
resources to be included in the ``477 plan.'' This will enable the
smaller Federally-recognized tribes to receive their own WIA funding
and participate in the demonstration authorized by P.L. 102-477, if
their total employment and training funds to be included in the plan
equal or exceed that dollar threshold. There were also suggestions that
the Department attempt to accommodate Congressionally mandated service
areas, States and counties identified in statute as comprising the
service area of a specific tribe into the hierarchy system, which these
draft regulations attempt to do. The Department will continue to review
this issue as it develops the Final Rule.
2. Geographic Coverage: To address problems which have arisen under
JTPA, Sec. 668.294 states the Department's position on covering
specific geographic areas for which there are no viable entities
willing or able to provide services under section 166 of WIA. The
Department will make every effort to fund suitable grantees for each
area. If a suitable grantee cannot be found, the funds for that service
area will be used for technical assistance or distributed among other
grantees.
3. Funding Formula(s): As under JTPA, the WIA rule allocates funds
for Native American grantees by geographic service area, based upon the
funding formula set forth in Sec. 668.300. The Department has chosen to
allocate funds by formula rather than base grant amounts upon the
levels proposed in grant applications for several reasons. First, other
than a requirement that the Department consult with the grantee
community on ``developing a funding distribution plan,'' the Act is
silent as to how funds are to be distributed among selected grantees.
The legislative history does not indicate any Congressional intent to
deviate from the Department's traditional method of funding by a
geographic allocation formula. The Department believes that experience
in funding by formula under JTPA for over 15 years has demonstrated
success in ensuring sufficient funds for a high level of service to
customers. Once a grantee demonstrates that it meets the minimum
threshold for designation, including the ability to administer funds
under Sec. 668.220, the funding formula ensures that sufficient funds
are available so that selected grantees can operate a viable,
successful program. For these reasons, it is the Department's view that
the proposed allocation formula of Sec. 668.300 is consistent with the
requirement that grants, contracts and cooperative agreements be made
on a competitive basis. The current JTPA section 401 funding formula is
retained in this Rule, pending further discussions on the subject
during the formulation of the Final Rule during 1999. Also included in
Sec. 668.296 are the hold-harmless provisions, carry-in limitations,
and the 1% set-aside for technical assistance and training (TAT)
contained in the current JTPA regulations or policy.
[[Page 18684]]
Subpart C--Services to Customers
1. Services to Customers: The same basic JTPA section 401
eligibility criteria are being retained for the section 166 program.
The allowable services are taken straight from the Act, and listed in
this subpart for clarity and to further promote the ``user friendly''
approach of the regulations. Indian-specific activities, such as
support of the Tribal Employment Rights Office (TERO), have been
included, as well as the allowability of sequential enrollment or
enrollment of participants in more than one WIA program.
2. Restrictions on Allowable Activities: Because of the importance
of some of these restrictions, such as the prohibition on using WIA
funds for economic development in the section 166 program, the
Department included Sec. 668.350 in these regulations rather than
merely referring to similar sections in the State workforce investment
system regulations. Section 668.350 lists these restrictions, primarily
from WIA sections 181 and 195.
3. Interaction with One-Stop Centers: Section 668.360 recognizes
that section 166 grantees are ``mandatory partners,'' in the One-Stop
delivery system, and reiterates the statutory requirement for a
memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the section 166 grantee and
the Local Board. This section outlines the provisions the MOU must
contain, and the circumstances under which the Local Board may engage
the section 166 grantee in these negotiations. Because of the remote
location(s) of some section 166 grantees (their distance from the
nearest One-Stop center) and other logistical problems, especially for
tribes serving rural areas, the Department recognizes that successfully
executing a meaningful MOU with the Local Board may not always be
possible. Thus, Sec. 668.910 allows Federally-recognized tribes to
request a waiver of section 121 requirements with the agreement of the
Local Board. Although financial contribution to the operation of a One-
Stop center is a matter of local negotiation, the funding and audit
issues involving the restrictions on the uses of section 166 funds must
be taken into consideration. The primary argument against having to
financially support the One-Stop centers is that the State is already
funded to serve Native Americans, at least for core services, and all
requests for intensive and training services would probably be referred
to the Native American grantee. The INA Rules specify the INA grantee's
responsibility as a One-Stop partner. This part does not relieve the
One-Stop system of its responsibility to serve Native Americans in the
same manner as it serves all other individuals or specialized groups.
Some parties also expressed concern that any funds provided to another
agency which could not be directly tied to the provision of services to
Native Americans could result in a disallowed cost to the INA grantee.
In response to suggestions, the Department took a closer look at
section 121 of WIA and attempted to write regulations in such a way
that interaction with One-Stop systems would adhere to statutory
requirements, but not dictate the exact nature of section 166 grantee
interaction with the One-Stop system. Additional questions which were
raised concerning the limitation on section 166 funds, that they only
be used for the benefit of Native Americans. Questions dealt with
financial support of a One-Stop center, and how this prohibition would
be documented for audit purposes. Section 668.340 clearly states that
no expenditures of section 166 funds may be made for individuals not
eligible under section 166. Part 662 contains specific language that
addresses One-Stop arrangements, including a similar provision
providing that a partner's resources may only be used to provide
services to individuals eligible under the partner's authorizing
statute. This section also requires the grantees to describe the
process for negotiating the MOU with their Local Board in their Two
Year Plan.
4. Payments to Participants: Section 668.370 contains the same
requirements about minimum wage coverage, the payment of allowances,
the applicability of labor standards, and limitations on participant
wages that were in effect under JTPA in 20 CFR part 632. The Department
considers it important, for ease of reference by the grantees, to
clearly state these requirements in regulations rather than cross-
referencing the Act or other statutes. The Department also included a
statement in Sec. 668.370 specifically allowing the payment of
incentive bonus payments to participants who meet or exceed established
goals, to avoid audit questions which have arisen under JTPA section
401 activities.
5. Grantee Capacity Building: Section 668.380 reflects the
Department's intention to provide section 166 grantees with technical
assistance and training as required by section 166(h)(5) of the Act.
Subpart D--Supplemental Youth Services
It is significant that this is a separate subpart. Although this
program is only available to certain types of entities, and eligible
grantees will cover the provision of supplemental youth services in
their Two Year Plan rather than in a separate document, the Department
received suggestions for a separate youth subpart for clarity's sake.
The Department agrees that supplemental youth services warrants a
separate subpart in this Rule. In part 668, the youth requirements are
covered in subpart D, with a minimum of definition beyond that provided
in the Act, except for the funding formula (Sec. 668.440) and the
provisions making the hold harmless factor, the reallocation
provisions, and provisions concerning the use of funds not claimed by
grantees applicable to youth funds as well. Section 668.460 covers the
applicability of performance measures and standards to the supplemental
youth program. A number of suggestions received from ``urban'' grantees
indicated their desire to receive supplemental youth services funding.
However, after further review, the Department decided that the language
of the statute did indeed limit recipients of these funds to those
entities serving Indian/Alaska Native/Native Hawaiian youth residing on
or near a reservation. The regulations clarify additional details
concerning the provision of supplemental youth services, such as the
requirement that most participants be low-income individuals, that the
definition of ``eligible youth'' applies to section 166 programs, that
performance measures and standards are applicable to the supplemental
youth programs, and that the funding provisions for the adult program
(reallocation, carry-in limits, use of funds, etc.) also apply to youth
programs.
Subpart E--Services to Communities
Not contained in the current JTPA section 401 regulations, this
subpart, addressing services to communities, was included for purposes
of clarification, following the recommendations of the Work Group. The
regulations discuss the kinds of services that can be provided to
communities and employers, such as customized training and child care.
Many of these services, especially to communities at large, have been
provided under JTPA for some time, but have not been discussed
previously in regulations. Some of the provisions found here, however,
appear in 20 CFR part 632 in various places, such as the reference to
the Indian Financing Act of 1974, contained in Sec. 668.520.
[[Page 18685]]
Subpart F--Accountability for Services and Expenditures
1. Contents of Subpart: This subpart reflects one of the Act's key
reform principles of strengthened accountability, and contains sections
on various aspects of grantee ``accountability,'' including the nature
of the INA grantee's accountability to the Native American community,
to the Department, and to the individual participants. Sections covered
here include reporting, performance measures and standards, the
prevention of fraud and abuse, grievance systems, and equal access
provisions which are similar to the corresponding JTPA section 401
provisions. Several of the regulatory provisions, such as those at
Sec. 668.630(c) and (d) (gifts and nepotism), are unique to the Native
American grantee program.
2. Service Preference: There has always been a controversy in
Indian programs, dating back to JTPA and its predecessor, the
Comprehensive Employment and Training Act (CETA), concerning the
ability of a tribe to grant preference to its own tribal members at the
expense of, or to the exclusion of, other Native Americans residing in
its service area. These regulations clearly state that these
exclusionary practices are prohibited. However, in response to grantee
concerns, the regulations state that grantees may still identify target
populations to be served (for example, the disabled, Temporary
Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) recipients, substance abusers) and
have this priority approved in the Two Year Plan.
Subpart G--Planning/Funding Process
This subpart contains details about plan formulation and
submission, including the statutory requirement for a Two Year Plan for
delivering comprehensive WIA services. Also included here are the
Department's procedures for plan review and approval, and the
requirements for subsequent plan modification. These procedures are
being added to make the regulations more ``user friendly,'' and because
there are changes from the procedures used under JTPA, such as the
change from a one-year plan to a two-year plan, and the dropping of a
requirement for a separate summer plan.
Subpart H--Administrative Requirements
1. Contents of Subpart: This subpart describes in detail the
systems each grantee must have in place to properly administer a
section 166 program under WIA. It also addresses cost allocation and
allowability, audit requirements, applicable cost principles, cash
management requirements, and the treatment of program income. Much of
this subpart consists of cross-references to the appropriate general
administrative sections of 20 CFR part 667, or to other Departmental or
Federal regulations.
2. Administrative Cost Limits: By far the majority of suggestions
received involved the issue of the administrative cost limit under WIA.
Section 166 of the Act is silent on the level of administrative costs
permitted. Many felt that the 10 percent (10%) limit on local workforce
investment areas in title I would place a tremendous strain on even the
largest programs, while making it impossible for smaller grantees to
operate at all (97 out of 183 JTPA section 401 grantees receive less
than $100,000 annually). The grantees who submitted suggestions all
wanted at least the 20% administrative cost limit currently in place
for JTPA, section 401, and the INA Welfare-to-Work (INA WtW) programs.
To allay concerns over adjusting to new rates, Sec. 667.210(b) provides
that the INA administrative cost ceiling is to be established in the
grant agreement. Any adjustments to the 10 percent limit will be
addressed in the grant agreement, and will be based on the particular
needs of the grantee.
Subpart I--Miscellaneous Program Provisions
Covered in this subpart are the regulatory and statutory waiver
provisions under section 166(h)(3) of WIA, which were not available
under JTPA. This includes the requirements for documenting a waiver and
circumstances under which section 121 requirements may be waived, and
provisions which may not be waived. Also covered are the allowability
of participation in the demonstration under Pub. L. 102-477, and an
elaboration of the role of the Native American Employment and Training
Council. The latter section was added to clearly state the role of the
Council in the consultative process, and to support its activities.
Part 669--Migrant and Seasonal Farmworker Programs under Section
167
Introduction
This part provides the program and administrative requirements for
the operation of the Migrant and Seasonal Farmworker (MSFW) program,
including the MSFW Youth program under section 127(b)(1)(A)(iii). Part
669 is organized in five subparts addressing: purpose and definitions;
the MSFW program's service delivery system; MSFW customers and
available program services; performance accountability, planning and
waiver authority; and the MSFW youth program.
The MSFW program is administered nationally in the Department by
using a limited competitive process to select applicants for grant
awards. The selected grantees operate the grant programs in most States
and Puerto Rico. The vehicle for soliciting and receiving comments
during the development of the MSFW regulations is the Migrant and
Seasonal Farmworker Employment and Training Advisory Committee. At the
Committee's first meeting on November 5 and 6, 1998, two workgroups of
volunteers from the grantee community were formed to assist the
Department in developing the policies underlying these regulations. The
members met to develop an initial discussion draft and continued
providing comments by e-mail.
Subpart A--Purpose, Definitions, and Federal Administration
This subpart covers the statement of purpose at Sec. 669.100, and
provides applicable farmworker-specific definitions and Federal
administrative requirements.
1. Definitions: The definitions in this subpart are those unique to
this program. The major issues requiring definition are ``allowances,''
``capacity enhancement,'' and ``emergency assistance.'' (Other terms
are defined for clarification.)
Allowances--The MSFW program permits payments of allowances to
enable individuals to participate in classroom training. The economic
condition of most farmworkers does not permit their participation in
full-time training without on-going financial assistance. The
definition of ``allowances'' establishes when allowance payments are
permitted and the maximum hourly rate. Grantees may use a lower rate.
Capacity Enhancement--Section 167 of WIA authorizes the Department
to provide funds for capacity enhancement as part of technical
assistance activities. The Rule provides that capacity enhancement
includes staff training for grantee staff members. The MSFW program has
a history of using discretionary funds to finance some of the costs of
grantee staff development activities. The definition authorizes the
continuation of such activities.
Emergency Assistance--Some parties expressed a need for reducing
the administrative burdens relating to providing emergency assistance
to farmworkers. These services are unique
[[Page 18686]]
for the MSFW program and address urgent needs of a short duration, such
as medical, housing or food support required by MSFWs moving along the
migrant stream. When applying for emergency assistance, farmworkers
must provide personal and family information to demonstrate
eligibility. The general program eligibility requirement of having to
produce verifying source documentation such as annual tax returns that
one would normally leave at home, frustrates grantees' attempts to
respond to urgent needs of farmworkers. To rectify this problem, the
regulation provides that when a person applies for emergency services
only, an expedited eligibility determination process may be used. The
process is expedited by exempting the grantee from requiring
documentary evidence to support the farmworker's eligibility except
regarding work authorization and compliance with Selective Service
registration requirements. The farmworker's eligibility is established
by a self-certification. This abbreviation of the application
requirement for receipt of emergency assistance is consistent with the
low unit cost of these services.
2. Federal Administration: Sections 669.120 and 669.130 provide
that the Department's administration of the MSFW program will be under
its national office, working directly with the operational grantees.
Section 669.140 restates the Department's obligation to provide
technical assistance. Sections 669.150 and 669.160 ensure consultation
with the Secretary's Migrant and Seasonal Farmworker Employment and
Training Advisory Committee. The MSFW Advisory Committee was
established in 1998 under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) for
this purpose, and it is intended that the Committee will advise the
Department on a variety of MSFW program matters. Since WIA does not
require the use of an Advisory Committee for the MSFW program, this
section establishes by regulation the FACA consultative process for the
MSFW program.
Subpart B--MSFW Program's Service Delivery System
This subpart contains provisions on the grantee selection process.
1. Eligible Entities: Section 167(b) of the Act requires that
organizations seeking to operate MSFW programs demonstrate their
familiarity with and an understanding of the target population. This
capacity is critical to the entity's ability to effectively provide the
services needed by MSFW's.
2. General Approach to Service Delivery: Grantees expressed concern
that, without regulatory clarification, some Local Boards would refuse
to recognize the MSFW grantee as a required partner in the One-Stop
delivery system established under title I of the WIA. These regulations
and those for the title I Adult and Dislocated Worker programs, clearly
state that MSFW grantees are required partners in those local areas
where grantee offices are located.
Grantees indicated that the regulations should provide for
equitable availability of all WIA services to all farmworkers entering
the One-Stop center doors. The primary service providers under Wagner-
Peyser and the title I Adult and Dislocated Worker programs have a
general responsibility to make their core, intensive and training
services available to all eligible farmworkers on a basis that is
equitable with other customer groups. The MSFW program has a specific
responsibility to supplement the level of those services by offering
farmworkers the services available under the MSFW program that are
tailored for farmworkers. Although the services available from the MSFW
program must include the general core services of the local One-Stop
centers, the MSFW program provides services developed especially for
addressing the unique needs of MSFW's.
To fulfill the required partner requirement, the MSFW grantee and
the One-Stop centers must develop the coordination necessary for the
effective delivery of One-Stop core services to farmworkers. This is to
be achieved through the agreements negotiated between the MSFW grantee
and the Local Boards. The resulting agreements, including appropriate
cost sharing arrangements, are to be described in the Memorandum of
Understanding. MSFW grantees have stressed the importance of having an
operational structure under the regulations to establish good-faith
negotiation of the MOU's. Without protections for ensuring the
integrity of the MOU negotiations, these grantees believed that their
participation at many One-Stop centers would be jeopardized. The
specific environment expected is one that ensures the MSFW grantees
have a level playing field for negotiating with the Local Boards. Both
part 662 and Sec. 669.220 make it clear that Local Boards and MSFW
grantees must enter into good faith negotiations to develop an
equitable assignment of roles, responsibilities and costs between them.
MSFW grantees have made it clear that they want to be recognized as
required One-Stop partners only where it is geographically appropriate
to their operations, stressing the importance of limiting the required
MOU's within the States to those appropriate to the MSFW grantee's
circumstances. This is due to the potential administrative burden in
many States because of the large number of Local Boards with which
MOU's would have to be negotiated. There is a clear preference for a
regulatory provision permitting the negotiation of a single, Statewide
MOU or limiting the required MOU's to those Local Boards where it is
clearly meaningful, such as with those areas in which the MSFW grantee
operates.
The regulations provide an operating structure for MOU
negotiations. Section 669.350 states the MSFW grantees' obligations for
providing the core services of the local One-Stop center to the
farmworkers it serves. A corollary requirement exists for the Local
Board under Sec. 662.410(b). Basically, the process for addressing how
respective obligations will be fulfilled is the negotiation of the MOU,
as required for all local partners in a One-Stop delivery system. The
regulation clarifies that the MOU's negotiated by the MSFW grantees
shall provide the terms of necessary financial or in-kind compensation
for services exchanged between the MSFW grantee and the Local Board.
The matter of establishing an appropriate environment for negotiating
MOU's is addressed in this section. It provides for ETA to determine
when the MSFW grantee is responsible for failed negotiation of MOU's
with Local Boards. Under the regulations for the One-Stop delivery
system, any failure to execute a MOU with a required partner must be
reported by the Local Board to the Governor, and by the Governor to the
Secretary of Labor and to any other head of a Federal agency with
responsibility for oversight of a partner's program. The regulation
limits the required MOU's to those Local Boards located in areas where
there is a grantee field office. This limitation establishes that the
MSFW grantees are not required to negotiate MOU's with Local Boards
serving geographic areas that are inappropriate for the MSFW program,
such as areas where the MSFW program will not be operating. The
Department encourages MSFW grantees to develop working relationships
through electronic or other means for an appropriate purpose such as
referral, in areas with large concentrations of MSFWS which are not
served by a grantee field office.
3. Termination: Section 669.230 provides the grounds for
terminating an MSFW grantee. The regulation provides authority for the
Grant Officer to initiate
[[Page 18687]]
termination when there is a need to protect funds and when there is a
substantial or persistent violation of requirements. It also outlines
the procedures for emergency termination.
4. Discretionary Account: Section 669.240(b) authorizes the
continuation of a discretionary account. Historically, the Department
has been authorized to reserve up to six percent of the funds
appropriated each year for the MSFW program to fund discretionary
activities. These activities support those needs of MSFWs that are not
met by the basic job training program. Such activities include grants
to support housing programs for farmworkers, and ETA-sponsored
technical assistance for grantees such as conferences, direct mini-
grants for specific grantee needs, and other technical assistance
activities. The delivery of technical assistance to grantee staff is
consistent with the provision of ``capacity enhancement,'' described
above. The funds also support the costs of the Secretary's Migrant and
Seasonal Farmworker Advisory Committee. Section 669.240(b) continues
this limited discretionary authority to use up to six percent of the
funds appropriated under section 167.
Subpart C--MSFW Program Customers and Available Program Services
This subpart describes who is eligible for services provided under
section 167 of WIA, the program responsibilities, and the nature and
scope of the program activities authorized under the Act.
1. Eligibility: Section 669.320 summarizes applicant eligibility
terms defined in section 167 (h) of the Act.
2. Customer Approach: Customer choice is a primary focus of WIA.
The regulations are necessary to ensure that farmworkers have an
opportunity to make choices about the services and training available
to them. To meet these objectives, it is necessary to provide guidance
to the MSFW grantees on serving their farmworker customers. This is
achieved by providing services through a case management approach,
which may include core, intensive, and training services, and related
assistance and supportive services (Sec. 669.330). As provided in 20
CFR part 663, prior to intensive services, a participant must receive
at least one core service, and prior to training services, a
participant must receive at least one intensive service. The
regulations provide, however, that the delivery of intensive services
(Sec. 669.370) and training services (Sec. 669.410) may be combined
under a single structure or continuum. To meet immediate needs of
farmworkers and their families, Sec. 669.360 authorizes grantees to
provide emergency assistance--for example, services such as health care
and housing assistance. This is an example of features within the MSFW
program and these regulations to address the special needs of MSFW's.
It illustrates how this MSFW program supplements through its diversity
of approaches, the types of services available to farmworkers under the
Adult and Dislocated Worker programs.
3. Intensive Services: Many farmworkers have special needs and
require additional resources that the MSFW grantees are funded to
provide. Accordingly, MSFW grantees provide intensive services, which
may include individual employment plans, and may be based on objective
assessments and periodic reviews of participant employment and training
needs. Section 669.370 indicates the kinds of intensive services that
are appropriate for MSFW's. This approach may differ from the service
delivery design of a local One-Stop center because the MSFW program is
intended to offer opportunities for MSFWs to redirect their lives by
learning the skills and knowledge required for employment in higher
skilled occupations. Usually, when farmworkers seek employment
assistance from an MSFW grantee, they are trying to abandon seasonal
farmwork (but not necessarily all agricultural employment) with its
inherent uncertainty, poverty and other hardships. Helping farmworkers
to overcome the barriers they face when seeking to attain better
employment may require the concurrent provision of intensive and
training services.
4. Objective Assessment and Individual Employment Plan: These two
case management instruments may be utilized for participants seeking
services beyond core services, and provide the means to achieve a
sustained customer focus. The description of objective assessment is
covered at Sec. 669.380. The description of objective assessment is
provided to clarify the range of resources available and to suggest
that assessment should be an ongoing process. Customer focus is
maintained through the use of an individual employment plan (IEP), a
tool to identify the intensive services, training, and support services
necessary to lead to economic self-sufficiency. The most important
aspects of the IEP are that it is jointly developed between the
customer and the service provider and that it should be continuously
relied upon to guide the participant's participation to a successful
conclusion. The IEP is a record of the participant's employment,
training, and supportive services needs, and a mutually developed
strategy for reaching the participant's goals. Regulatory guidance is
necessary to ensure that the minimum standards expected by ETA and the
grantee community, are understood and achieved in developing and
maintaining IEP's for MSFW's.
5. Training Services: In addition to the training services
authorized under section 134(d)(4)(D) and section 167(d) of the Act,
experience has shown that additional training services, such as
training in housing development assistance or workplace safety, are
occasionally required to assist farmworker customers. Section 669.410
authorizes MSFW grantees to provide such services. Section 669.420 also
regulates the minimum requirements for OJT contracts under the MSFW
program.
Subpart D--Performance Accountability, Planning and Waiver
Authority
This subpart addresses program administration, consultation with
grantees and awarding of grants.
1. Performance Standards and Measures: Section 669.500 provides
that the core performance indicators applicable to the formula programs
under title I will also apply to the MSFW program. This section also
authorizes the MSFW program to develop performance measures that are in
addition to the core indicators of performance. The levels of
performance for each indicator will take into account the
characteristics of the participants to be served and the economic
conditions in the area served by the grantee and negotiated as part of
the grantee plan approval.
2. Funding and Planning Documents: Sections 669.510 through 669.540
describe the grant planning process. To reduce administrative effort at
both the Federal and grantee levels, Sec. 668.510 requires that the
plans submitted cover a two-year (biennial) period even though funding
is available on an annual basis. This represents a change from past
requirements for single year plans and affords an opportunity for
strategic planning and continuous improvement. Section 669.520
establishes the minimum requirement for the MSFW grant plan. Other
requirements may be added by the Solicitation for Grant Application
(SGA) for any given biennial period.
3. Unilateral Modifications: Section 669.540 authorizes the
Department to unilaterally increase or reduce grant funding levels in
response to Congressional action. The section also establishes the
limitations under which grantees may unilaterally modify grant
[[Page 18688]]
plans and provide authority for bilateral modifications.
4. Cost Classification and Reporting: Section 669.550 describes
cost classification and reporting procedures and addresses compliance
with the administrative cost limitations.
5. Waivers: The general waiver authority in WIA does not apply to
the MSFW program. However, waiver authority may prove beneficial for
addressing unforseen circumstances encountered by MSFW program
grantees. The regulations at Secs. 669.560 and 669.570 provide MSFW
program grantees with limited regulatory waiver authority to waive
certain provisions of the WIA regulations.
Subpart E--The MSFW Youth Program
This subpart includes 669.600 through 669.680 which provide the
introduction to the MSFW youth program by stating its purpose and its
relationship to the MSFW program under section 167. Regulations at
Secs. 669.630 through 669.660 provide the qualifying process for
receiving a MSFW youth grant.
1. Designation of Grantees: The section 167 MSFW youth program will
be administered through grant agreements with eligible entities,
selected through a competitive process. Sections 669.630 and 668.640
describe the eligibility criteria for designation and the process by
which an entity may apply for designation as a MSFW youth program
grantee. To be designated, an organization must submit a youth program
plan in response to the Departments's Solicitation for Grant
Applications. MSFW grantees expressed concern that a separate
competition for youth grants would lead to instances where two
different MSFW grantees were operating in the same areas. To respond to
this concern, MSFW grantees operating within the same service area will
be afforded special consideration in the grant competition.
2. Allocation of Funds: Section 669.650 regulates the funding of
the MSFW youth program on a competitive basis by providing that the
allocation of funds will be based on the merits of the proposal. In
addition, the process may utilize allocation methods that promote a
geographical distribution of funds that supports a balanced funding of
both large and small scale competitive applications. The grantees also
expressed concern that a larger jurisdictions would have a competitive
advantage. To allay concerns over the potential for irregular
distributions among jurisdictions and grantees due to relative
differences in size, the regulations provide that the Department will
use a means for geographical distribution that promotes acceptance of
both large and small scale applications under the competition.
3. Grant Plans: Section 669.660 describes the planning documents
required in an applicant's response to the Department's SGA and the
applicable submission dates, respectively.
4. Eligibility: Section 669.670 establishes the eligibility
criteria for farmworker youth who wish to participate in the MSFW youth
program. They are youth age 14 through 21, who are economically
disadvantaged.
5. Allowable Activities and Services: Section 669.680 authorizes
the MSFW youth program activities. Specific activities are authorized
by references to sections of the WIA and by described youth activities.
Part 670--Job Corps
Introduction
This part provides regulations for the Job Corps program,
authorized in title I, subtitle C of WIA. The regulations address the
scope and purpose of the Job Corps program and provide requirements
relating to selection of sites for Job Corps centers; selection and
funding of service providers; screening, selection and assignment of
eligible youth to Job Corps centers; operation of Job Corps centers;
and required services for Job Corps students. This part also provides
regulations covering new WIA requirements such as the establishment of
a business and community liaison and an industry council for each Job
Corps center, and the focus on accountability, including specific
performance measures for Job Corps centers and service providers. The
Department's intent in these regulations is to incorporate the
requirements of title I, subtitle C of the Act, and to describe the
programs and services which must be available for Job Corps students,
as well as the requirements dictated by the unique residential
environment of a Job Corps center (such as provision of meals,
transportation, recreational activities and related services).
Subpart A--Scope and Purpose
1. Purpose: This subpart indicates that part 670 contains
regulatory provisions that apply to the Job Corps program, describes
the purpose of the program, and provides definitions. It also specifies
that the Job Corps Director is delegated authority to carry out the
responsibilities of the Secretary under title I, subtitle C of the Act
related to the operation of the Job Corps program, and that references
in this part referring to ``guidelines'' or ``procedures issued by the
Secretary'' mean that the Job Corps Director will issue such
guidelines. Procedures guiding day-to-day operations are provided in a
Policy and Requirements Handbook (PRH). The PRH includes minimum
program requirements and expected outcomes for specific program
components, such as education and training, student support, and
administration. In addition, general guidance and best practices are
provided for in a number of program areas in Job Corps Technical
Assistance Guides issued by the Job Corps Director.
2. Partnership: The program purpose incorporates the Act's intent
that Job Corps will operate as a national, residential program in
partnership with States and local communities. The partnership theme is
carried throughout various sections of part 670 in requirements for Job
Corps centers and service providers to serve on local youth councils,
to operate as a One-Stop partner, and to work with employers.
Several parties noted that the regulations provide in this subpart
that Job Corps is a national program which operates in partnership with
States, communities, Local Boards, youth councils, One-Stop centers and
partners, and other youth programs, but argued that the earlier
proposed language relating to partnership with One-Stop was not strong
enough in other statements indicating services (such as outreach/
admissions and placement) would be provided by One-Stop centers or
partners to the extent practicable. The intent in using language such
as ``to the extent practicable'' or ``to the fullest extent possible''
is not to limit or discourage the development of linkages between Job
Corps and One-Stop, but to recognize (1) the language in section
145(a)(3) of the Act which requires the Secretary to conduct outreach
and screening activities ``to the extent practicable'' through
arrangements with applicable One-Stop centers, community action
agencies, business organizations, labor organizations, and entities
that have contact with youth; (2) the requirements in section 147 of
the Act for selection of Job Corps center operators and other service
providers (such as outreach/admissions, placement, and provision of
continued services) on a competitive basis in accordance with Federal
procurement law and regulations; and (3) the language in section 148(e)
and section 149(b) of the Act which requires the Secretary to give
priority to ``One-Stop partners'' in selecting a provider for continued
services for graduates and to ``utilize One-Stop delivery systems to
[[Page 18689]]
the fullest extent possible'' for the placement of graduates into jobs.
The use of these phrases should not be interpreted as a limitation, but
as a statement of intent to enter into partnerships in all situations
where it is feasible to do so.
Subpart B--Site Selection and Protection and Maintenance of
Facilities
This subpart describes how sites for Job Corps centers are
selected, the handling of capital improvements and new construction on
Job Corps centers, and responsibilities for facility protection and
maintenance. The requirements in this subpart are not significantly
different from the corresponding requirements in the JTPA Job Corps
regulations.
Subpart C--Funding and Selection of Service Providers
This subpart describes entities which are eligible to receive funds
to operate Job Corps centers and to provide operational support
services. It also describes how contract center operators and
operational support service contractors are selected, emphasizing the
requirements for competitive contract awards. New requirements,
including consultation with the appropriate Governor, center industry
council, and Local Board in development of requests for proposals for
center operators, are included in Sec. 670.310(a). In addition,
Sec. 670.310(c), describes requirements to be included in center
requests for proposals to assess providers' past performance as well as
their ability to coordinate Job Corps center activities with State and
local activities (including One-Stop centers), and to provide
vocational training that reflects employment opportunities in areas
where students will seek jobs. These requirements are described in
section 147(a)(2)(B) of the Act.
Subpart D--Recruitment, Eligibility, Screening, Selection and
Assignment, and Enrollment
1. This subpart describes who is eligible for Job Corps under WIA
and provides additional factors which are considered in selecting an
eligible applicant for enrollment. This subpart also discusses who will
conduct outreach and admissions activities for the Job Corps, and the
responsibilities of those organizations. Section 670.450 describes the
new requirements of section 145(c) of WIA for an assignment plan for
Job Corps centers. Assignment plans will be developed and used to
establish a target for each Job Corps center for the percentage of
students enrolled who will come from the State or Department of Labor
region in which the center is located, and the regions surrounding the
center. In addition, this subpart addresses the requirement of section
145(d) of the Act that students must be assigned to centers closest to
their homes, with consideration given to the special needs of
applicants or their parents or guardians when making assignments.
Subpart E--Program Activities and Center Operations
1. Program Activities: This subpart describes the services and
types of training each Job Corps center must provide, as well as center
responsibilities in the administration of work-based learning. This
subpart also describes the residential support services Job Corps
centers must provide, and centers' responsibility for student
accountability. Required residential support services include providing
a safe, secure environment, an ongoing counseling program, food
service, access to medical care, recreation, and leadership programs
for students. In addition, centers must account for the whereabouts,
participation, and status of students while they are enrolled in Job
Corps.
2. Behavior Management and Zero Tolerance for Violence and Drugs:
This subpart establishes requirements for Job Corps centers to have
student behavior management systems. Section 670.540 describes Job
Corps' zero tolerance policy for violence, drugs, and unauthorized
goods. The regulatory language in this section continues current
requirements for automatic dismissal of students who commit specific
offenses (the one strike and you're out policy) specified in Job Corps'
zero tolerance policy. The Secretary will issue procedures which
continue this practice. Section 670.540 also addresses the requirements
of section 145(a)(2) of the Act for drug testing of all students. This
subpart also contains requirements to ensure students are provided due
process in disciplinary actions. This process will include center fact-
finding and review boards, and appeal procedures.
3. Experimental, Research, and Demonstration Projects: This subpart
also addresses the authorization, provided in section 156 of the Act,
for experimental, research and demonstration projects related to the
Job Corps program.
Subpart F--Student Support
This subpart includes authorization of leave for students from
center activities, and provisions of cash allowances and bonuses, and
clothing for students. In addition to being eligible to receive
transportation, students are eligible for other benefits, including
basic living allowances to cover personal expenses, such as toiletries,
snacks, etc., in accordance with guidance issued by the Secretary. The
allowance and bonus system is structured to provide incentives for
specific accomplishments of students, such as vocational completion.
Students are also provided with a modest clothing allowance to enable
them to obtain clothes that are appropriate for class and for the
workplace.
Subpart G--Placement and Continued Services
1. Placement Services: This subpart discusses placement services
for graduates of the Job Corps program in accordance with section 149
of the Act. The regulation focuses on graduates, which is a significant
change from previous Job Corps policy and practice, since placement
services have traditionally been provided for all students who leave
Job Corps, no matter how long they were enrolled or how much of the
program they completed. The regulatory language in this subpart is
substantially different from what is contained in the JTPA Job Corps
regulations to reflect the emphasis in title I, subtitle C on provision
of services for graduates. The authority provided in section 149(d) of
the Act, to allow for placement of former students (non-graduates), is
reflected in Sec. 670.710, but placement services are not required for
anyone other than graduates. The ability to provide placement services
for former students as well as for graduates will be contingent on
having the funding resources to do so. It is, therefore, likely that
the level of placement services for graduates and for former enrollees
will differ. This subpart also discusses who will provide placement
services, and the responsibilities of Job Corps placement agencies in
placing graduates in jobs.
2. Continued Services for Graduates: This subpart discusses section
148(d) of the Act, which requires provision of 12 months of continued
service for graduates. Sections 670.740 and 670.750 discuss this
requirement and who may provide those services. Provision of continued
services is a new requirement, and a new level of effort for Job Corps
service providers, and will likely divert some funding resources which
have been used in the past for provision of placement services for all
students.
[[Page 18690]]
Subpart H--Community Connections
1. This subpart describes new requirements for Job Corps
representatives to serve on local youth councils, as provided for in
section 117(h) of the Act, for center business and community liaisons,
and for center industry councils. Section 670.800(d) describes the role
of center industry councils, as prescribed in section 154(b) of the
Act, to analyze labor market information and identify job opportunities
in areas where students will seek employment and the skills needed for
those jobs, and to recommend changes in center vocational training
offerings as appropriate. The intent of this subpart is to provide
regulatory language to tie Job Corps centers more closely to their
local communities and local employers to ensure that the vocational and
other training students receive will enable them to obtain meaningful
jobs in their home communities when they graduate.
Subpart I--Administrative and Management Provisions
1. Student Benefits and Protections: This subpart provides
requirements relating to Tort Claims, Federal Employees Compensation
Act (FECA) benefits for students, safety and health, and law
enforcement jurisdiction on Job Corps center property.
2. Program Accountability and Performance Indicators: Subpart I
also incorporates specific requirements relating to performance
assessment and accountability contained in section 159(c) of the Act,
as well as requirements for performance improvement plans, as provided
for in section 159(f)(2), for Job Corps center operators or other
service providers who fail to meet expected levels of performance.
Sections 670.975 and 670.980 describe how performance of the Job Corps
program will be assessed and the required indicators of performance.
Indicators of performance include placement rates of graduates in jobs,
including jobs related to vocational training received, average wage at
placement and six and twelve months after job entry, retention in
employment six and twelve months after job entry, the number of
graduates who achieved job readiness and employment skills, and the
number who entered postsecondary or advanced training programs.
3. Financial and Audit Responsibilities: This subpart also
discusses financial management responsibilities of Job Corps center
operators and other Job Corps service providers, as well as Federal
audit requirements.
4. Disclosure of Information and Resolution of Complaints: This
subpart includes requirements relating to student records and
disclosure of information about Job Corps students; and procedures for
resolution of complaints and disputes of students and other parties by
center operators and service providers.
Part 671--National Emergency Grants for Dislocated Workers
Introduction
Section 170 of WIA provides for technical assistance, and section
171 provides for demonstration, pilot, multiservice, research and
multistate projects. Although the Department has not regulated on these
sections, it is important to note these activities for the general
workforce investment system.
Section 170(a) provides that the Secretary will provide, coordinate
and support the development of training, technical assistance, staff
development and other activities to States and localities, and in
particular, to assist States in making transitions from carrying out
JTPA to carrying out activities under title I of WIA.
Section 170(b) provides for a portion of the funds reserved by the
Secretary under WIA section 132(a)(2) to be used to: (1) Assist States
that do not meet the State performance measures for dislocated workers;
(2) assist other States, local areas and other entities involved in
providing assistance for dislocated workers and to promote continuous
improvement to dislocated workers under title I of WIA; or (3) assist
staff who provide rapid response services, including training of those
staff regarding proven methods of promoting, establishing and assisting
labor-management or transition committees to plan for effective
adjustment assistance for workers impacted by dislocation events.
Section 171(a), (b), and (c) of WIA describe employment and
training projects which may be funded as well as the processes for such
funding. Section 171(d) provides for dislocated worker demonstration
projects and pilot projects, multiservice and multistate projects. The
purpose of dislocated worker demonstration projects is to test
innovative approaches that address priorities established by the
Secretary, are consistent with the goals described in WIA, and
subsequently may prove beneficial in providing adjustment assistance to
larger dislocated worker populations. Generally, projects will be
funded as a result of competitive solicitations published in the
Federal Register, however, the Secretary may negotiate and fund
projects other than through such solicitations.
Part 671 describes the availability of a portion of the funds
reserved by the Secretary under WIA section 132(a)(2)(A) for assistance
to dislocated workers.
1. National Emergency Grants: Part 671 contains limited regulations
regarding dislocated worker funds reserved for national emergency
grants. Section 173 of WIA authorizes the Secretary to award
discretionary funds to serve dislocated workers in certain situations.
These regulations describe circumstances under which funds may be
available, including to provide employment and training assistance to
workers affected by major economic dislocations (such as plant
closures, mass layoffs, closures or realignments of military
installations, dislocations due to federal policies, etc.); and to
provide assistance to Governors of States when FEMA has determined that
a major disaster, as defined in the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief
and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122 (1) and (2)), has occurred
in the area.
These regulations emphasize the importance of rapid response
assistance for the development of requests for national emergency
funds. The Department sets a high priority on the early collection of
information regarding workers being laid off, receiving requests for
funds when there are insufficient State and local dislocated formula
funds available to meet the needs of workers being laid off--to ensure
that there are funds available in the local area when the workers first
need the assistance. Early intervention to assist workers being
dislocated is critical to enable them to find or qualify for new jobs
as soon as possible after the dislocation occurs. While these
regulations highlight some of the key elements and requirements for
applying for national emergency funds, guidelines to apply for national
emergency funds will be published separately in the Federal Register.
Part 652--Establishment and Functioning of State Employment
Services
Introduction
This part implements the amendments to the Wagner-Peyser Act (the
Act) made by WIA. The WIA amendments add regulations at 20 CFR part
652, subpart C and make technical changes to subpart A.
[[Page 18691]]
Subpart A--Employment Service Planning and Operations
In subpart A, the Department removes references to JTPA, and
replaces them with WIA. It also updates definitions and removes and
reserves two sections. These WIA amendments to the Act are effective
July 1, 1999.
A comprehensive reading of WIA shows that Congress intended to
ensure a central role for the Wagner-Peyser Act State agency designated
to administer funds authorized under the Act to provide job finding and
placement services to job seekers, including unemployment insurance
(UI) claimants, veterans, migrant and seasonal farm workers, disabled
individuals, and employers in the State One-Stop delivery system. The
regulations governing the operation of the basic labor exchange program
have been located at 20 CFR part 652, subpart A for many years and they
are well known to State agencies administering the Wagner-Peyser Act.
The Workforce Investment Act changes the environment in which the
existing rules are applied. It does not amend the statutory provisions
underlying the rules. The Department determined that it would not be
appropriate to add new rules resulting from amendments to the Wagner-
Peyser Act to 20 CFR part 652, subpart A, but that it is important the
new rules be linked with the existing rules. Therefore, the Department
restricted amendments to the Wagner-Peyser Act regulations at 20 CFR
part 652, subpart A to only those reference citations required by the
Workforce Investment Act. The Department will raise no issue under 20
CFR part 652 with States solely on the basis that they operate under
JTPA during PY 1999. The operations rules governing Wagner-Peyser Act
services required by WIA are reflected in part 20 CFR 652, subpart C.
Subpart C--Wagner-Peyser Act Services in a One-Stop Delivery System
Environment
Section 652, subpart C, Secs. 652.200 through 652.216, describe the
requirements for the establishment and functioning of State Wagner-
Peyser Act services in a One-Stop delivery system environment. The
State must maintain Wagner-Peyser Act funds under the authority of the
Governor as a separate funding source to ensure a statewide delivery
system of public labor exchange services. These regulations specify
that the Wagner-Peyser Act agency retains responsibility for, and
oversight of, all Wagner-Peyser Act services provided through the One-
Stop delivery system, and explain that funds allocated to States under
section 7(a) must be used to deliver Wagner-Peyser Act services through
the One-Stop delivery system. Each of the three tiers of labor exchange
service must be available: self-service, facilitated self-help service,
and staff-assisted service. Sections 652.209 and 210 strengthen the
relationship between the Wagner-Peyser Act State agency and the UI
agency by requiring that reemployment services be provided,
commensurate with available resources and in conjunction with other
One-Stop partners, to those UI claimants who are required under any
Federal or State UI law to receive the services as a condition of
receiving unemployment benefits. The regulations reflect the
Department's interpretation of the Wagner-Peyser Act, affirmed in State
of Michigan v. Alexis M. Herman, (W.D. MI, Southern Div.) to require
that job finding, placement and reemployment services funded under the
Act, including services to veterans, be delivered by public merit-staff
employees.
The Department is issuing these regulations after carefully
considering and reacting to input received from the public. The
preponderance of input focused on two themes: the relationship between
the Wagner-Peyser Act State Agency and the One-Stop delivery system
centers, and the preservation of the merit system for public employees.
A range of suggestions were received regarding the relationship
between Wagner-Peyser Act services and the One-Stop delivery system.
These regulations emphasize the State Agency's role as a One-Stop
partner in delivering services seamlessly to job seekers and employers
as a part of the One-Stop delivery system. State agencies have
flexibility to deliver labor exchange services appropriate to local
needs in accordance with a Memorandum of Understanding entered into
with the local workforce investment board.
Some parties responding to merit-staff issues expressed concern
that merit-staff employees might potentially come under the direction
of an individual who is employed by a different agency or entity. In
response to this concern, the Department has written the regulations at
Sec. 652.215 and Sec. 652.216 to emphasize the retention of merit
system protections for public employees, and limit the One-Stop
operator to providing guidance to employees funded under the Wagner-
Peyser Act in accordance with an agreed-upon MOU.
III. Regulatory Flexibility and Regulatory Impact Analysis
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended in 1996 (5
U.S.C. chapter 6), requires the Federal government to anticipate and
minimize the impact of rules and paperwork requirements on small
entities. ``Small entities'' are defined as small businesses (those
with fewer than 500 employees, except where otherwise provided), small
non-profit organizations (those with fewer than 500 employees, except
where otherwise provided) and small governmental entities (those in
areas with fewer than 50,000 residents). ETA has assessed the potential
impact of this Interim Final Rule by consulting with a wide range of
small entities, in order to identify and address any areas of concern.
Based on that assessment, the Agency certifies that the Interim Final
Rule, as promulgated, will not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The WIA Interim Final Rule implements major reforms to the nation's
job training system. The WIA will provide resources to states,
localities, and other entities, including small entities, to assist
youth, adults, and dislocated workers in preparing for, obtaining and
retaining employment. This Rule sets forth the rights, responsibilities
and conditions under which state and local governments may receive
grants to operate programs in local workforce investment areas with
such funds. Governments in local workforce investment areas are not
small governmental entities. These areas generally have a population of
at least 500,000 and are intended to replace existing service areas
under the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) which generally have a
population of at least 200,000. Consequently, the Department does not
foresee an adverse impact on small governmental entities. Nevertheless,
the Department has consulted extensively with state and local officials
and their representatives to insure that any potential effect would be
minimal. These consultations included two week-long conferences in
which state and local governmental participants worked in groups
divided by specialized area of interest, and the participation of state
and local governmental officials under the Intergovernmental Personnel
Act.
The Department also provided a number of opportunities, through a
variety of media, for the input of small businesses, non-profits and
any other interested parties. These opportunities included 12 town hall
meetings spanning the nation in ten locations,
[[Page 18692]]
and an interactive web site providing ETA policy and responses to
questions from the public. Additionally, in order to solicit comments
from the widest possible audience, ETA broadly disseminated its
developing policies through the publication of a White Paper, among
other documents, which were available on the Internet, published in the
Federal Register and distributed throughout the employment and training
community.
The Interim Final Rule provides significant flexibility to States
and Local governments to design programs and to determine policy and
spending priorities for the use of WIA grant funds. This policy-making
flexibility is embodied in Sec. 661.120. The Rule provides States and
Local governments with additional flexibility to design systems that
meet the specific needs of each state and local area through the
general and work-flex waiver provisions at Secs. 661.410 and 661.430.
The Department has taken steps to further ameliorate any potential
burdens through Sec. 667.210 of the Interim Final Rule, which provides
that states and localities may use a portion of their grant funds (up
to five percent at the State level and up to ten percent at the local
level) for management and administration of the grant, rather than for
the direct provision of services to participants. Because the WIA
statutory limit on administrative cost is lower than the existing JTPA
limit, States and localities were also extensively consulted regarding
the regulatory definition of these administrative costs to ensure that
this cost category is defined as flexibly as possible. The Rule
requires the reporting of costs in only two categories--program and
administrative--and excludes certain information technology costs from
the administrative cost category.
A portion of WIA funds is available for direct grants from the
Department. ETA has consulted with representatives of the migrant and
seasonal farm worker community, and Indian and Native American tribal
governments to minimize any burdens that provisions of the Rule would
have on those communities. The Rule provides limited authority to these
grantees to receive waivers of certain provisions of the Rule, to
lessen any burden on these communities.
To further ameliorate any burden on WIA direct grantees, the Rule
permits direct grantees to use a portion of WIA funds for
administrative costs expenditure. Unlike formula funds, the
administrative cost limit for direct grantees is not specified in the
Rule but will be negotiated in the grant agreement to take into account
individual circumstances. Similarly, the period of availability for
expenditure of grant funds is established in the grant agreement rather
than set by Rule to take into account individual circumstances. Based
on provisions such as these, the Department has concluded that the Rule
will not place undue burdens on small entities. In addition, under to
the Small Business Regulatory Fairness Act (SBREFA) (5 U.S.C. Chapter
8), the Department has determined that this Interim Final Rule is not a
``major rule,'' as defined in 5 U.S.C. 804(2). The Department certifies
that this Interim Final Rule has been assessed in accordance with Pub.
L. 105-227, 112 Stat. 2681, for its effect on family well-being.
IV. Executive Order 12866
Pursuant to Executive Order 12866, the Department has evaluated
this Interim Final Rule and has determined its provisions are
consistent with the statement of regulatory philosophy and principles
promulgated by the Executive Order. The Department of Labor is required
by statute to prescribe regulations for the WIA program within 180 days
of enactment. Within this limited time frame, the Department has made
every reasonable effort to obtain input in a purposeful manner from a
variety of interested parties (State and local government officials,
community-based organizations, Intergovernmental Organizations, other
stakeholders, and the general public). The WIA grants increase the
resources available to the public and private organizations that
promote long-term employment and self-sufficiency. The Department has
determined the Interim Final Rule will not have an adverse effect in a
material way on the nation's economy.
The Department has developed the Interim Final Rule in close
consultation with the Department of Education, and with other
interested Federal agencies. Based on that consultation, the Department
has determined that this Interim Final Rule will not create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere with any action taken or planned
by another Federal Agency.
This Interim Final Rule implements the Workforce Investment Act,
which is the only major reform of the nation's job training and
employment system in over 15 years. Consequently, this Interim Final
Rule raises novel policy issues. Therefore, the Department finds it to
be a significant regulatory action which has been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget for the purposes of Executive Order
12866.
V. Unfunded Mandates
The Interim Final Rule has been reviewed in accordance with the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) and
Executive Order 12875. Section 202 of UMRA requires that a covered
agency prepare a budgetary impact statement before promulgating a rule
that includes any Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by
state, local and Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more in any one year.
If a covered agency must prepare a budgetary impact statement,
section 205 of UMRA further requires that it select the most cost-
effective and least burdensome alternative that achieves the objectives
of the rule and is consistent with the statutory requirements. In
addition, section 203 of UMRA requires a plan for informing and
advising any small government that may be significantly or uniquely
impacted.
The Department has determined that the WIA Interim Final Rule will
not mandate the expenditure by the State, local, and Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of more than
$100 million in any one year. Accordingly, the Department has not
prepared a budgetary impact statement, specifically addressed the
regulatory alternatives considered, or prepared a plan for informing
and advising any significant or uniquely impacted small government.
VI. Effective Date and Absence of Notice and Comment
The Department has determined, in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B), that the statutory mandate to promulgate regulations
within 180 days of the enactment of the statute constitutes good cause
for waiving notice and comment proceedings. Furthermore, WIA became
effective upon the date of enactment, August 7, 1998. It is critical
that the Department quickly issue regulations to assist States which
wish to begin operating under WIA as early as possible. Congress also
recognized this urgency in sec. 506(c) of the Act, by specifically
authorizing the Department to issue an Interim Final Rule. Accordingly,
the Department finds that the issuance of a Proposed Rule, rather than
an Interim Final Rule, would be contrary to the public interest. This
Interim Final Rule will become effective on May 17, 1999. The
Department is committed to meeting the statutory deadline to issue a
Final Rule by December 31, 1999. This Interim Final Rule sets a comment
period to elicit any concerns raised by the rule for
[[Page 18693]]
consideration in the development of the Final Rule. The Department has
provided a comment period of 90 days to provide a significant period
for public input into any revisions to parts 652 and 660 through 671
for the Final Rule.
VII. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number
The program is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
at No. 17.255.
List of Subjects in 20 CFR Parts 652 and 660 through 671
Grant programs, labor, employment, job training programs.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 31st day of March 1999.
Alexis M. Herman,
Secretary of Labor.
Raymond L. Bramucci,
Assistant Secretary of Labor, Employment and Training Administration.
For the reason stated in the preamble, 20 CFR Ch. V is amended as
follows:
1. Parts 660 through 671 are added and Part 652 is amended to read
as follows:
PART 660--INTRODUCTION TO THE REGULATIONS FOR WORKFORCE INVESTMENT
SYSTEMS UNDER TITLE I OF THE WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT
Sec.
Sec. 660.100 What is the purpose of title I of the Workforce
Investment Act of 1998?
Sec. 660.200 What do the regulations for workforce investment
systems under title I of the Workforce Investment Act cover?
Sec. 660.300 What definitions apply to the regulations for
workforce investment systems under title 1 of WIA?
Authority: Sec. 506(c), Pub. L. 105-220; 20 USC 9276(c).
Sec. 660.100 What is the purpose of title I of the Workforce
Investment Act of 1998?
The purpose of title I of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998
(hereafter referred to as WIA) is to provide workforce investment
activities that increase the employment, retention and earnings of
participants, and increase occupational skill attainment by
participants, which will improve the quality of the workforce, reduce
welfare dependency, and enhance the productivity and competitiveness of
the Nation's economy. These goals are achieved through the workforce
investment system. (WIA sec. 106.)
Sec. 660.200 What do the regulations for workforce investment systems
under title I of the Workforce Investment Act cover?
The regulations found in 20 CFR parts 660--671 set forth the
regulatory requirements that are applicable to programs operated with
funds provided under title I of WIA. This part 660 describes the
purpose of that Act, explains the format of these regulations and sets
forth definitions for terms that apply to each part. Part 661 contains
regulations relating to Statewide and local governance of the workforce
investment system. Part 662 describes the One-Stop system and the roles
of One-Stop partners. Part 663 sets forth requirements applicable to
WIA title I programs serving adults and dislocated workers. Part 664
sets forth requirements applicable to WIA title I programs serving
youth. Part 665 contains regulations relating to Statewide activities.
Part 666 describes the WIA title I performance accountability system.
Part 667 sets forth the administrative requirements applicable to
programs funded under WIA title I. Parts 668 and 669 contain the
particular requirements applicable to programs serving Indians and
Native Americans and Migrant and Seasonal Farmworkers, respectively.
Parts 670 and 671 describe the particular requirements applicable to
the Job Corps and other national programs, respectively.
Sec. 660.300 What definitions apply to the regulations for workforce
investment systems under title I of WIA?
In addition to the definitions set forth at WIA sec. 101, the
following definitions apply to the regulations set forth in 20 CFR
parts 660--671:
Department or DOL means the U.S. Department of Labor, including its
agencies and organizational units.
Designated region means a combination of local areas that are
partly or completely in a single labor market area, economic
development region, or other appropriate contiguous subarea of a State,
that is designated by the State under WIA section 116(c), or a similar
interstate region that is designated by two or more States under WIA
section 116(c)(4).
Employment and training activity means a workforce investment
activity that is carried out for an adult or dislocated worker.
EEO data means data on race and ethnicity, age, sex, and disability
required by regulations implementing sec. 188 of WIA governing
nondiscrimination.
ETA means the Employment and Training Administration of the U.S.
Department of Labor.
Grant means an award of WIA financial assistance by the U.S.
Department of Labor to an eligible WIA recipient.
Grantee means the direct recipient of grant funds from the
Department of Labor. A grantee may also be referred to as a recipient.
Literacy means an individual's ability to read, write, and speak in
English, and to compute, and solve problems, at levels of proficiency
necessary to function on the job, in the family of the individual, and
in society.
Local Board means a local workforce investment board established
under WIA sec. 117, to set policy for the local workforce investment
system.
Outlying area means the United States Virgin Islands, Guam,
American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the
Republic of the Marshall Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia,
and the Republic of Palau.
Participant means an individual who has registered under 20 CFR
663.105 or 20 CFR 664.215 and has been determined to be eligible to
participate in and who is receiving services (except for follow up
services) under a program authorized by WIA title I. Participation
commences on the first day, following determination of eligibility, on
which the individual begins receiving core, intensive, training or
other services provided under WIA title I.
Recipient means an entity to which a WIA grant is awarded directly
from the Department of Labor to carry out a program under title I of
WIA. The State is the recipient of funds awarded under WIA secs.
127(b)(1)(C)(i)(II), 132(b)(1)(B) and 132(b)(2)(B).
Register means the process for collecting information to determine
an individual's eligibility for services under WIA title I. Individuals
may be registered in a variety ways, as described in 20 CFR 663.105 and
20 CFR 664.215.
Secretary means the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor.
Self certification means an individual's signed attestation that
the information he/she submits to demonstrate eligibility for a program
under title I of WIA is true and accurate.
State Board means a State workforce investment board established
under WIA sec. 111.
State means each of the several States of the United States, the
District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. The term
``State'' does not include outlying areas.
Subrecipient means an entity to which a subgrant is awarded and
which is accountable to the recipient (or higher tier subrecipient) for
the use of the funds provided.
Vendor means an entity responsible for providing generally required
goods or services to be used in the WIA
[[Page 18694]]
program. These goods or services may be for the recipient's or
subrecipient's own use or for the use of participants in the program.
Wagner-Peyser Act means the Act of June 6, 1933, as amended,
codified at 29 U.S.C. 49 et seq.
Workforce investment activities mean the array of activities
permitted under title I of WIA, which include employment and training
activities for adults and dislocated workers, as described in WIA
section 134, and youth activities, as described in WIA section 129.
Youth activity means a workforce investment activity that is
carried out for youth.
PART 661--STATEWIDE AND LOCAL GOVERNANCE OF THE WORKFORCE
INVESTMENT SYSTEM UNDER TITLE I OF THE WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT
Subpart A--General Governance Provisions
Sec. 661.100 What is the workforce investment system?
Sec. 661.110 What is the role of the Department of Labor as the
Federal governmental partner in the governance of the workforce
investment system?
Sec. 661.120 What are the roles of the local and State governmental
partner in the governance of the workforce investment system?
Subpart B--State Governance Provisions
Sec. 661.200 What is the State Workforce Investment Board?
Sec. 661.205 What is the role of the State Board?
Sec. 661.210 Under what circumstances may the Governor select an
alternative entity in place of the State Workforce Investment Board?
Sec. 661.220 What are the requirements for the submission of the
State workforce investment plan?
Sec. 661.230 What are the requirements for modification of the
State workforce investment plan?
Sec. 661.240 How do the unified planning requirements apply to the
five-year strategic WIA and Wagner-Peyser plan and to other
Department of Labor plans?
Sec. 661.250 What are the requirements for designation of local
workforce investment areas?
Sec. 661.260 What are the requirements for automatic designation of
workforce investment areas relating to units of local government
with a population of 500,000 or more?
Sec. 661.270 What are the requirements for temporary and subsequent
designation of workforce investment areas relating to areas that had
been designated as service delivery areas under JTPA?
Sec. 661.280 What right does an entity have to appeal the
Governor's decision rejecting a request for designation as a
workforce investment area?
Sec. 661.290 Under what circumstances may States require Local
Boards to take part in regional planning activities?
Subpart C--Local Governance Provisions
Sec. 661.300 What is the Local Workforce Investment Board?
Sec. 661.305 What is the role of the Local Workforce Investment
Board?
Sec. 661.310 Under what limited conditions may a Local Board
directly be a provider of core services, intensive services, or
training services, or act as a One-Stop Operator?
Sec. 661.315 Who are the required members of the Local Workforce
Investment Boards?
Sec. 661.320 Who must chair a Local Board?
Sec. 661.325 What criteria will be used to establish membership of
the Local Board?
Sec. 661.330 Under what circumstances may the State use an
alternative entity as the local workforce investment board?
Sec. 661.335 What is a youth council, and what is its relationship
to the Local Board?
Sec. 661.340 What are the responsibilities of the youth council?
Sec. 661.345 What are the requirements for the submission of the
local workforce investment plan?
Sec. 661.350 What are the contents of the local workforce
investment plan?
Sec. 661.355 When must a local plan be modified?
Subpart D--Waivers and Work-Flex
Sec. 661.400 What is the purpose of the general statutory and
regulatory waiver authority provided at section 189(i)(4) of the
Workforce Investment Act?
Sec. 661.410 What provisions of WIA and the Wagner-Peyser Act may
be waived, and what provisions may not be waived?
Sec. 661.420 Under what conditions may a Governor request and the
Secretary approve a general waiver under section 189(i)(4)?
Sec. 661.430 Under what conditions may the Governor submit a
workforce flexibility plan?
Sec. 661.440 What limitations apply to the State's Workforce
Flexibility Plan authority under WIA?
Authority: Sec. 506(c), Pub. L. 105-220; 20 U.S.C. 9276(c).
Subpart A--General Governance Provisions
Sec. 661.100 What is the workforce investment system?
Under title I of WIA, the workforce investment system provides the
framework for delivery of workforce investment activities at the State
and local levels to individuals who need those services, including job
seekers, dislocated workers, youth, incumbent workers, new entrants to
the workforce, veterans, persons with disabilities, and employers. Each
State's Governor is required, in accordance with the requirements of
this Part, to establish a State Board; to designate local workforce
investment areas; and to oversee the creation of Local Boards and One-
Stop service delivery systems in the State.
Sec. 661.110 What is the role of the Department of Labor as the
Federal governmental partner in the governance of the workforce
investment system?
(a) Successful governance of the workforce investment system will
be achieved through cooperation and coordination of Federal, State and
local governments.
(b) The Department of Labor sees as one of its primary roles
providing leadership and guidance to support a system that meets the
objectives of title I of WIA, and in which State and local partners
have flexibility to design systems and deliver services in a manner
designed to best achieve the goals of WIA based on their particular
needs. These regulations provide the framework in which State and local
officials can exercise such flexibility within the confines of the
statutory requirements. Wherever possible, system features such as
design options and categories of services are not narrowly defined, and
are subject to State and local interpretation.
(c) The Secretary, in consultation with other Federal Agencies, as
appropriate, may publish guidance on interpretations of statutory and
regulatory provisions. State and local policies, interpretations,
guidelines and definitions that are consistent with interpretations
contained in such guidance will be considered to be consistent with the
Act for purposes of Sec. 661.120 of this subpart.
Sec. 661.120 What are the roles of the local and State governmental
partner in the governance of the workforce investment system?
(a) Local Boards should establish policies, interpretations,
guidelines and definitions to implement provisions of title I of WIA to
the extent that such policies, interpretations, guidelines and
definitions are not inconsistent with the Act or the regulations or
with State policies.
(b) State Boards should establish policies, interpretations,
guidelines and definitions to implement provisions of title I of WIA to
the extent that such policies, interpretations, guidelines and
definitions are not inconsistent with the Act and regulations.
[[Page 18695]]
Subpart B--State Governance Provisions
Sec. 661.200 What is the State Workforce Investment Board?
(a) The State Board is a board established by the Governor in
accordance with the requirements of WIA section 111 and this section.
(b) The membership of the State Board must meet the requirements of
WIA section 111(b). The State Board must contain two or more members
representing the categories described in WIA sections
111(b)(1)(C)(iii)-(v), and special consideration must be given to chief
executive officers of community colleges and community based
organizations in the selection of members representing the entities
identified in WIA section 111(b)(1)(C)(v).
(c) The Governor may appoint any other representatives or agency
officials, such as agency officials responsible for economic
development and juvenile justice programs in the State.
(d) Members who represent organizations, agencies or other entities
must be individuals with optimum policy making authority within the
entities they represent.
(e) A majority of members of the State Board must be
representatives of business. Members who represent business must be
individuals who are owners, chief executive officers, chief operating
officers, or other individuals with optimum policy making or hiring
authority, including members of Local Boards.
(f) The Governor must appoint the business representatives from
among individuals who are nominated by State business organizations and
business trade associations. The Governor must appoint the labor
representatives from among individuals who are nominated by State labor
federations.
(g) The Governor must select a chairperson of the State Board from
the business representatives on the board.
(h) The Governor may establish terms of appointment or other
conditions governing appointment or membership on the State Board.
(i) For the programs and activities carried out by one-stop
partners, as described in WIA section 121(b) and 20 CFR 662.210, the
State Board must include:
(1) The lead State agency officials with responsibility for such
program, or
(2) In any case in which no lead State agency official has
responsibility for such a program service, a representative in the
State with expertise relating to such program, service or activity.
(j) The State Board must conduct its business in an open manner as
required by WIA section 111(g), by making available to the public, on a
regular basis through open meetings, information about the activities
of the State Board, including information about the State Plan prior to
submission of the plan, information about membership, and on request,
minutes of formal meetings of the State Board. (WIA section 111)
Sec. 661.205 What is the role of the State Board?
The State Board must assist the Governor in the:
(a) Development of the State Plan;
(b) Development and continuous improvement of a Statewide system of
activities that are funded under subtitle B of title I of WIA, or
carried out through the One-Stop delivery system, including--
(1) Development of linkages in order to assure coordination and
nonduplication among the programs and activities carried out by One-
Stop partners, including, as necessary, addressing any impasse
situations in the development of the local memorandum of understanding;
and
(2) Review of local plans;
(c) Commenting at least once annually on the measures taken under
section 113(b)(14) of the Carl D. Perkins Vocational and Technical
Education Act;
(d) Designation of local workforce investment areas,
(e) Development of allocation formulas for the distribution of
funds for adult employment and training activities and youth activities
to local areas, as permitted under WIA sections 128(b)(3)(B) and
133(b)(3)(B);
(f) Development and continuous improvement of comprehensive State
performance measures, including State adjusted levels of performance,
to assess the effectiveness of the workforce investment activities in
the State, as required under WIA section 136(b);
(g) Preparation of the annual report to the Secretary described in
WIA section 136(d);
(h) Development of the Statewide employment statistics system
described in section 15(e) of the Wagner-Peyser Act; and
(i) Development of an application for an incentive grant under WIA
section 503. (WIA section 111(d).)
Sec. 661.210 Under what circumstances may the Governor select an
alternative entity in place of the State Workforce Investment Board?
(a) The State may use any State entity that meets the requirements
of WIA section 111(e) to perform the functions of the State Board.
(b) If the State uses an alternative entity, the State workforce
investment plan must demonstrate that the alternative entity meets all
three of the requirements of WIA section 111(e). Section 111(e)
requires that such entity:
(1) Was in existence on December 31, 1997;
(2)(i) Was established under section 122 (relating to State Job
Training Coordinating Councils) or title VII (relating to State Human
Resource Investment Councils) of the Job Training Partnership Act (29
U.S.C. 1501 et seq.), as in effect on December 31, 1997, or
(ii) Is substantially similar to the State Board described in WIA
section 111(a), (b), and (c) and Sec. 661.200; and
(3) Includes, at a minimum, two or more representatives of business
in the State and two or more representatives of labor organizations in
the State.
(c) If the alternative entity does not provide for representative
membership of each of the categories of required State Board membership
under WIA section 111(b), the State Plan must explain the manner in
which the State will ensure an ongoing role for any such group in the
workforce investment system.
(d) If the membership structure of the alternative entity is
significantly changed after December 31, 1997, the entity will no
longer be eligible to perform the functions of the State Board. In such
case, the Governor must establish a new State Board which meets all of
the criteria of WIA section 111(b). A significant change in the
membership structure does not mean the filling of a vacancy on the
alternative entity, but does include any change in the organization of
the alternative entity or in the categories of entities represented on
the alternative entity which requires a change to the alternative
entity's charter or a similar document that defines the formal
organization of the alternative entity.
(e) In 20 CFR parts 660 through 671, all references to the State
Board also apply to an alternative entity used by a State.
Sec. 661.220 What are the requirements for the submission of the State
Workforce Investment Plan?
(a) The Governor of each State must submit a State Workforce
Investment Plan (State Plan) in order to be eligible to receive funding
under title I of WIA and the Wagner-Peyser Act. The State Plan must
outline the State's five year strategy for the workforce investment
system.
[[Page 18696]]
(b) The State Plan must be submitted in accordance with planning
guidelines issued by the Secretary of Labor. The planning guidelines
set forth the information necessary to document the State's vision,
goals, strategies, policies and measures for the workforce investment
system (that were arrived at through the collaboration of the Governor,
chief elected officials, business and other parties), as well as the
information required to demonstrate compliance with WIA, and the
information detailed by WIA and these regulations and the Wagner-Peyser
Act and the Wagner-Peyser regulations at 20 CFR part 652.
(c) The State Plan must contain a description of the State's
performance accountability system, and the State performance measures
in accordance with the requirements of WIA section 136 and 20 CFR part
666.
(d) The State must provide an opportunity for public comment on and
input into the development of the State Plan prior to its submission.
The opportunity for public comment must include an opportunity for
comment by representatives of business, representatives of labor
organizations, and chief elected official(s) and must be consistent
with the requirement, at WIA section 111(g), that the State Board makes
information regarding the State Plan and other State Board activities
available to the public through regular open meetings. The State Plan
must describe the State's process and timeline for ensuring a
meaningful opportunity for public comment.
(e) The Secretary reviews completed plans and must approve all
plans within ninety days of their submission, unless the Secretary
determines in writing that:
(1) The plan is inconsistent with the provisions of title I of WIA
or these regulations. For example, a finding of inconsistency would be
made if the Secretary and the Governor have not reached agreement on
the adjusted levels of performance under WIA section 136(b)(3)(A), or
there is not an effective strategy in place to ensure development of a
fully operational One-Stop delivery system in the State; or
(2) The portion of the plan describing the detailed Wagner-Peyser
plan does not satisfy the criteria for approval of such plans as
provided in section 8(d) of the Wagner-Peyser Act or the Wagner-Peyser
regulations at 20 CFR part 652.
Sec. 661.230 What are the requirements for modification of the State
workforce investment plan?
(a) The State may submit a modification of its workforce investment
plan at any time during the five-year life of the plan.
(b) Modifications are required when:
(1) Changes in Federal or State law or policy substantially change
the assumptions upon which the plan is based.
(2) There are changes in the Statewide vision, strategies,
policies, performance indicators, the methodology used to determine
local allocation of funds, reorganizations which change the working
relationship with system employees, changes in organizational
responsibilities, changes to the membership structure of the State
Board or alternative entity and similar substantial changes to the
State's workforce investment system.
(3) The State has failed to meet performance goals, and must adjust
service strategies.
(c) Modifications are required in accordance with the Wagner-Peyser
provisions at 20 CFR 652.210.
(d) Modifications to the State Plan are subject to the same public
review and comment requirements that apply to the development of the
original State Plan.
(e) State Plan modifications will be approved by the Secretary
based on the approval standard applicable to the original State Plan
under Sec. 661.220(e).
Sec. 661.240 How do the unified planning requirements apply to the
five-year strategic WIA and Wagner-Peyser plan and to other Department
of Labor plans?
(a) A State may submit to the Secretary a unified plan for any of
the programs or activities described in WIA section 501(b)(2). This
includes the following DOL programs and activities:
(1) The five-year strategic WIA and Wagner-Peyser plan;
(2) Trade adjustment assistance activities and NAFTA--TAA;
(3) Veterans' programs under 38 U.S.C. Chapter 41;
(4) Programs authorized under State unemployment compensation laws;
(5) Welfare-to-Work (WtW) programs; and
(6) Senior Community Service Employment Programs under title V of
the Older Americans Act.
(b) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, a State may
submit, as part of the unified plan, any plan, application form or any
other similar document, that is required as a condition for the
approval of Federal funding under the applicable program. These plans
include such things as the WIA plan, or the WtW plan. They do not
include jointly executed funding instruments, such as grant agreements,
or Governor/Secretary Agreements or items such as corrective actions
plans.
(c) A State which submits a unified plan under paragraph (a) of
this section will not be required to submit additional planning
materials as a condition for approval to receive Federal funds.
(d) Each portion of a unified plan submitted under paragraph (a) of
this section is subject to the particular requirements of Federal law
authorizing the program. All grantees are still subject to such things
as reporting and record-keeping requirements, corrective action plan
requirements and other generally applicable requirements.
(e) A unified plan must contain the information required by WIA
section 501(c) and will be approved in accordance with the requirements
of WIA section 501(d).
Sec. 661.250 What are the requirements for designation of local
workforce investment areas?
(a) The Governor must designate local workforce investment areas in
order for the State to receive funding under title I of WIA.
(b) The Governor must take into consideration the factors described
in WIA section 116(a)(1)(B) in making designations of local areas. Such
designation must be made in consultation with the State Board, and
after consultation with chief elected officials. The Governor must also
consider comments received through the public comment process described
in the State workforce investment plan under Sec. 661.220(d).
(c) The Governor may approve a request for designation as a
workforce investment area from any unit of general local government,
including a combination of such units, if the State Board determines
that the area meets the requirements of WIA section 116(a)(1)(B) and
recommends designation. (WIA section 116.)
Sec. 661.260 What are the requirements for automatic designation of
workforce investment areas relating to units of local government with a
population of 500,000 or more?
The requirements for automatic designation relating to units of
local government with a population of 500,000 or more and to rural
concentrated employment programs are contained in WIA section
116(a)(2).
Sec. 661.270 What are the requirements for temporary and subsequent
designation of workforce investment areas relating to areas that had
been designated as service delivery areas under JTPA?
The requirements for temporary and subsequent designation relating
to areas that had been designated as service
[[Page 18697]]
delivery areas under JTPA are contained in WIA section 116(a)(3).
Sec. 661.280 What right does an entity have to appeal the Governor's
decision rejecting a request for designation as a workforce investment
area?
(a) A unit of local government (or combination of units) or a rural
concentrated employment program grant recipient (as described at WIA
section 116(a)(2)(B), which has requested but has been denied its
request for designation as a workforce investment area under
Secs. 661.260-661.270, may appeal the decision to the State Board, in
accordance with appeal procedures established in the State Plan.
(b) If a decision on the appeal is not rendered in a timely manner
or if the appeal to the State Board does not result in designation, the
entity may request review by the Secretary of Labor, under the
procedures set forth at 20 CFR 667.640(a).
(c) The Secretary may require that the area be designated as a
workforce investment area, if the Secretary determines that:
(1) The entity was not accorded procedural rights under the State
appeals process; or
(2) The area meets the automatic designation requirements at WIA
section 116(a)(2) or the temporary and subsequent designation
requirements at WIA section 116(a)(3), as appropriate.
Sec. 661.290 Under what circumstances may States require Local Boards
to take part in regional planning activities?
(a) The State may require Local Boards within a designated region
(as defined at 20 CFR 660.300) to:
(1) Participate in a regional planning process that results in
regional performance measures for workforce investment activities under
title I of WIA. Regions that meet or exceed the regional performance
measures may receive regional incentive grants;
(2) Share, where feasible, employment and other types of
information that will assist in improving the performance of all local
areas in the designated region on local performance measures; and
(3) Coordinate the provision of WIA title I services, including
supportive services such as transportation, across the boundaries of
local areas within the designated region.
(b) Two or more States may designate a labor market area, economic
development region, or other appropriate contiguous subarea of the
States as an interstate region. In such cases, the States may jointly
exercise the State's functions described in this section.
(c) Designation of intrastate regions and interstate regions and
their corresponding performance measures must be described in the
respective State Plan(s). For interstate regions, the roles of the
respective governors, State Boards and Local Boards must be described
in the respective State Plans.
(d) Unless agreed to by all affected chief elected officials and
the Governor, these regional planning activities may not substitute for
or replace the requirements applicable to each local area under other
provisions of the WIA. (WIA section 116(a).)
Subpart C--Local Governance Provisions
Sec. 661.300 What is the Local Workforce Investment Board?
(a) The Local Workforce Investment Board (Local Board) is appointed
by the chief elected official in each local area in accordance with
State criteria established under WIA section 117(b), and is certified
by the Governor every two years, in accordance with WIA section
117(c)(2).
(b) In partnership with the chief elected official(s), the Local
Board sets policy for the portion of the Statewide workforce investment
system within the local area.
(c) The Local Board and the chief elected official(s) may enter
into an agreement that describes the respective roles and
responsibilities of the parties.
(d) The Local Board, in partnership with the chief elected
official, develops the local workforce investment plan and performs the
functions described in WIA section 117(d). (WIA section 117 (d).)
(e) In the case in which a local area includes more than one unit
of general local government in accordance with WIA section 117
(c)(1)(B), the chief elected officials of such units may execute an
agreement to describe their responsibilities for carrying out the roles
and responsibilities. If, after a reasonable effort, the chief elected
officials are unable to reach agreement, the Governor may appoint the
members of the local board from individuals nominated or recommended as
specified in WIA section 117(b).
(f) In the case in which the State Plan indicates that the State
will be treated as a local area under WIA title I, the Governor may
designate the State Board to carry out any of the roles of the Local
Board.
Sec. 661.305 What is the role of the Local Workforce Investment Board?
(a) WIA section 117(d) specifies that the Local Board is
responsible for:
(1) Developing the five-year local workforce investment plan (Local
Plan) and conducting oversight of the One-Stop system, youth activities
and employment and training activities under title I of WIA, in
partnership with the chief elected official;
(2) Selecting One-Stop operators with the agreement of the chief
elected official;
(3) Selecting eligible youth service providers based on the
recommendations of the youth council, and identifying eligible
providers of adult and dislocated worker intensive services and
training services, and maintaining a list of eligible providers with
performance and cost information, as required in 20 CFR part 663,
subpart E;
(4) Developing a budget for the purpose of carrying out the duties
of the Local Board, subject to the approval of the chief elected
official;
(5) Negotiating and reaching agreement on local performance
measures with the chief elected official and the Governor;
(6) Assisting the Governor in developing the Statewide employment
statistics system under the Wagner-Peyser Act;
(7) Coordinating workforce investment activities with economic
development strategies and developing employer linkages; and
(8) Promoting private sector involvement in the Statewide workforce
investment system through effective connecting, brokering, and coaching
activities through intermediaries such as the One-Stop operator in the
local area or through other organizations, to assist employers in
meeting hiring needs.
(b) The Local Board, in cooperation with the chief elected
official, appoints a youth council as a subgroup of the Local Board and
coordinates workforce and youth plans and activities with the youth
council, in accordance with WIA sec. 117(h) and Sec. 661.335.
(c) Local Boards which are part of a State designated region for
regional planning must carry out the regional planning responsibilities
required by the State in accordance with WIA section 116(c) and
Sec. 661.290.
(d) The Local Board must conduct business in an open manner as
required by WIA section 117(e), by making available to the public, on a
regular basis through open meetings, information about the activities
of the Local Board, including information about the local plan before
submission of the plan, and about membership, the designation and
certification of One-Stop operators, and the award of grants or
contracts to eligible providers of
[[Page 18698]]
youth activities, and on request, minutes of formal meetings of the
Local Board. (WIA sec. 117.)
Sec. 661.310 Under what limited conditions may a Local Board directly
be a provider of core services, intensive services, or training
services, or act as a One-Stop Operator?
(a) A Local Board may not directly provide core services, or
intensive services, or be designated or certified as a One-Stop
operator, unless agreed to by the chief elected official and the
Governor.
(b) A Local Board is prohibited from providing training services,
unless the Governor grants a waiver in accordance with the provisions
in WIA section 117(f)(1). The waiver shall apply for not more than one
year and may be renewed for not more than one additional year.
(c) The restrictions on the provision of core, intensive, and
training services by the Local Board, and designation or certification
as One-Stop operator, also apply to staff of the Local Board. (WIA sec.
117(f)(1) and (f)(2).)
Sec. 661.315 Who are the required members of the Local Workforce
Investment Boards?
(a) The membership of Local Board must be selected in accordance
with criteria established under WIA section 117(b)(1) and must meet the
requirements of WIA section 117(b)(2). The Local Board must contain two
or more members representing the categories described in WIA section
117(b)(2)(A)(ii)-(v), and special consideration must be given to the
entities identified in WIA section 117(b)(2)(A)(ii), (iv) and (v) in
the selection of members representing those categories. The Local Board
must contain at least one member representing each One-Stop partner.
(b) The membership of Local Boards may include individuals or
representatives of other appropriate entities, including entities
representing individuals with multiple barriers to employment and other
special populations, as determined by the chief elected official.
(c) Members who represent organizations, agencies or other entities
must be individuals with optimum policy making authority within the
entities they represent.
(d) A majority of the members of the Local Board must be
representatives of business in the local area. Members representing
business must be individuals who are owners, chief executive officers,
chief operating officers, or other individuals with optimum
policymaking or hiring authority. Business representatives serving on
Local Boards may also serve on the State Board.
(e) Chief elected officials must appoint the business
representatives from among individuals who are nominated by local
business organizations and business trade associations. Chief elected
officials must appoint the labor representatives from among individuals
who are nominated by local labor federations (or, for a local area in
which no employees are represented by such organizations, other
representatives of employees). (WIA sec. 117(b).)
Sec. 661.320 Who must chair a Local Board?
The Local Board must elect a chairperson from among the business
representatives on the board. (WIA sec. 117(b)(5).)
Sec. 661.325 What criteria will be used to establish membership of the
Local Board?
The Local Board is appointed by the chief elected official(s) in
the local area in accordance with State criteria established under WIA
section 117(b), and is certified by the Governor every two years, in
accordance with WIA section 117(c)(2). The criteria for certification
must be described in the State Plan. (WIA sec. 117(c).)
Sec. 661.330 Under what circumstances may the State use an alternative
entity as the local workforce investment board?
(a) The State may use any local entity that meets the requirements
of WIA section 117(i) to perform the functions of the Local Board. WIA
section 117(i) requires that such entity:
(1) Was established to serve the local area (or the service
delivery area that most closely corresponds to the local area);
(2) Was in existence on December 31, 1997;
(3)(i) Is a Private Industry Council established under to section
102 of the Job Training Partnership Act, as in effect on December 31,
1997; or
(ii) Is substantially similar to the Local Board described in WIA
section 117 (a), (b), and (c) and (h)(1) and (2); and
(4) Includes, at a minimum, two or more representatives of business
in the local area and two or more representatives of labor
organizations nominated by local labor federations or employees in the
local area.
(b)(1) If the Governor certifies an alternative entity to perform
the functions of the Local Board; the State workforce investment plan
must demonstrate that the alternative entity meets the requirements of
WIA section 117(i), set forth in paragraph (a) of this section.
(2) If the alternative entity does not provide for representative
membership of each of the categories of required Local Board membership
under WIA section 117(b), the local workforce investment plan must
explain the manner in which the Local Board will ensure an ongoing role
for any such group in the local workforce investment system.
(c) If the membership structure of an alternative entity is
significantly changed after December 31, 1997, the entity will no
longer be eligible to perform the functions of the Local Board. In such
case, the chief elected official(s) must establish a new Local Board
which meets all of the criteria of WIA section 117(a), (b), and (c) and
(h)(1) and (2). A significant change in the membership structure does
not mean the filling of a vacancy on the alternative entity, but does
include any change in the organization of the alternative entity or in
the categories of entities represented on the alternative entity that
requires a change to the alternative entity's charter or a similar
document that defines the formal organization of the alternative
entity.
(d) In these regulations, all references to the Local Board must be
deemed to also apply to an alternative entity used by a local area.
(WIA sec. 117(i).)
Sec. 661.335 What is a youth council, and what is its relationship to
the Local Board?
(a) A youth council must be established as a subgroup within each
Local Board.
(b) The membership of each youth council must include:
(1) Members of the Local Board, such as educators, employers, and
representatives of human service agencies, who have special interest or
expertise in youth policy;
(2) Members who represent service agencies, such as juvenile
justice and local law enforcement agencies;
(3) Members who represent local public housing authorities;
(4) Parents of eligible youth seeking assistance under subtitle B
of title I of WIA;
(5) Individuals, including former participants, and members who
represent organizations, that have experience relating to youth
activities; and
(6) Members who represent the Job Corps, if a Job Corps Center is
located in the local area represented by the council.
(c) Youth councils may include other individuals, who the chair of
the Local Board, in cooperation with the chief elected official,
determines to be appropriate.
[[Page 18699]]
(d) Members of the youth council who are not members of the Local
Board must be voting members of the youth council and nonvoting members
of the Local Board.
Sec. 661.340 What are the responsibilities of the youth council?
The youth council is responsible for:
(a) Coordinating youth activities in a local area;
(b) Developing portions of the local plan related to eligible
youth, as determined by the chairperson of the Local Board;
(c) Recommending eligible youth service providers in accordance
with WIA section 123, subject to the approval of the Local Board;
(d) Conducting oversight with respect to eligible providers of
youth activities in the local area, subject to the approval of the
Local Board; and
(e) Carrying out other duties, as authorized by the chairperson of
the Local Board, such as establishing linkages with educational
agencies and other youth entities.
Sec. 661.345 What are the requirements for the submission of the local
workforce investment plan?
(a) WIA section 118 requires that each Local Board, in partnership
with the appropriate chief elected officials, develops and submits a
comprehensive five-year plan to the Governor which identifies and
describes certain policies, procedures and local activities that are
carried out in the local area, and that is consistent with the State
Plan.
(b) The Local Board must provide an opportunity for public comment
on and input into the development of the local workforce investment
plan prior to its submission, and the opportunity for public comment on
the local plan must:
(1) Make copies of the proposed local plan available to the public
(through such means as public hearings and local news media);
(2) Include an opportunity for comment by members of the Local
Board and members of the public, including representatives of business
and labor organizations;
(3) Provide at least a thirty (30) day period for comment,
beginning on the date on which the proposed plan is made available,
prior to its submission to the Governor; and
(4) Be consistent with the requirement, in WIA section 117(e), that
the Local Board make information about the plan available to the public
on a regular basis through open meetings.
(c) The Local Board must submit any comments that express
disagreement with the plan to the Governor along with the plan.
Sec. 661.350 What are the contents of the local workforce investment
plan?
(a) The local workforce investment plan must meet the requirements
of WIA section 118(b). The plan must include:
(1) An identification of the workforce investment needs of
businesses, job-seekers, and workers in the local area;
(2) An identification of current and projected employment
opportunities and job skills necessary to obtain such opportunities;
(3) A description of the One-Stop delivery system to be established
or designated in the local area, including:
(i) How the Local Board will ensure continuous improvement of
eligible providers of services and ensure that such providers meet the
employment needs of local employers and participants; and
(ii) A copy of the local memorandum(s) of understanding between the
Local Board and each of the One-Stop partners concerning the operation
of the local One-Stop delivery system;
(4) A description of the local levels of performance negotiated
with the Governor and the chief elected official(s) to be used by the
Local Board for measuring the performance of the local fiscal agent
(where appropriate), eligible providers, and the local One-Stop
delivery system;
(5) A description and assessment of the type and availability of
adult and dislocated worker employment and training activities in the
local area, including a description of the local ITA system and the
procedures for ensuring that exceptions to the use of ITA's, if any,
are justified under WIA section 134(d)(4)(G)(ii) and 20 CFR 663.430;
(6) A description of how the Local Board will coordinate local
activities with Statewide rapid response activities;
(7) A description and assessment of the type and availability of
youth activities in the local area, including an identification of
successful providers of such activities;
(8) A description of the process used by the Local Board to provide
opportunity for public comment, including comment by representatives of
business and labor organizations, and input into the development of the
local plan, prior to the submission of the plan;
(9) An identification of the fiscal agent, or entity responsible
for the disbursal of grant funds;
(10) A description of the competitive process to be used to award
grants and contracts for activities carried out under this subtitle I
of WIA, including the process to be used to procure training services
that are made as exceptions to the Individual Training Account process
(WIA sec. 134(d)(4)(G)),
(11) A description of the criteria to be used by the Governor and
the Local Board, under 20 CFR 663.600, to determine whether funds
allocated to a local area for adult employment and training activities
under WIA sections 133(b)(2)(A) or (3) are limited, and the process by
which any priority will be applied by the One-Stop operator;
(12) In cases where an alternate entity functions as the Local
Board, the information required at Sec. 661.330(b), and
(13) Such other information as the Governor may require.
(b) The Governor must review completed plans and must approve all
such plans within ninety days of their submission, unless the Governor
determines in writing that:
(1) There are deficiencies identified in local workforce investment
activities carried out under this subtitle that have not been
sufficiently addressed; or
(2) The plan does not comply with title I of WIA and these
regulations, including the required consultations and public comment
provisions.
(c) In cases where the State is a single local area:
(1) The Secretary performs the roles assigned to the Governor as
they relate to local planning activities.
(2) The Secretary issues planning guidance for such States.
(3) The requirements found in WIA and in these regulations for
consultation with chief elected officials apply to the development of
State and local plans and to the development and operation of the One-
Stop delivery system.
Sec. 661.355 When must a local plan be modified?
The Governor must establish procedures governing the modification
of local plans. Situations in which modifications may be required by
the Governor include significant changes in local economic conditions,
changes in the financing available to support WIA title I and partner-
provided WIA services, changes to the Local Board structure, or a need
to revise strategies to meet performance goals.
Subpart D--Waivers and Work-Flex
Sec. 661.400 What is the purpose of the General Statutory and
Regulatory Waiver Authority provided at section 189(i)(4) of the
Workforce Investment Act?
(a) The purpose of the general statutory and regulatory waiver
authority is to provide flexibility to States and local areas and
enhance their
[[Page 18700]]
ability to improve the statewide workforce investment system.
(b) A waiver may be requested to address impediments to the
implementation of a strategic plan, including the continuous
improvement strategy, consistent with the key reform principles of WIA.
These key reform principles include:
(1) Streamlining services and information to participants through a
One-Stop delivery system;
(2) Empowering individuals to obtain needed services and
information to enhance their employment opportunities;
(3) Ensuring universal access to core employment-related services;
(4) Increasing accountability of States, localities and training
providers for performance outcomes;
(5) Establishing a stronger role for Local Boards and the private
sector;
(6) Providing increased State and local flexibility to implement
innovative and comprehensive workforce investment systems; and
(7) Improving youth programs through services which emphasize
academic and occupational learning.
Sec. 661.410 What provisions of WIA and the Wagner-Peyser Act may be
waived, and what provisions may not be waived?
(a) The Secretary may waive any of the statutory or regulatory
requirements of subtitles B and E of title I of WIA, except for
requirements relating to:
(1) Wage and labor standards;
(2) Non-displacement protections;
(3) Worker rights;
(4) Participation and protection of workers and participants;
(5) Grievance procedures and judicial review;
(6) Nondiscrimination;
(7) Allocation of funds to local areas;
(8) Eligibility of providers or participants;
(9) The establishment and functions of local areas and local
boards; and
(10) Procedures for review and approval of State and Local plans;
and
(b) The Secretary may waive any of the statutory or regulatory
requirements of sections 8 through 10 of the Wagner-Peyser Act (29
U.S.C. 49g--49i) except for requirements relating to:
(1) The provision of services to unemployment insurance claimants
and veterans; and
(2) Universal access to the basic labor exchange services without
cost to job seekers.
(c) The Secretary does not intend to waive any of the statutory or
regulatory provisions essential to the key reform principles embodied
in the Workforce Investment Act, described in Sec. 661.400, except in
extremely unusual circumstances where the provision can be demonstrated
as impeding reform. (WIA sec. 189(i).)
Sec. 661.420 Under what conditions may a Governor request, and the
Secretary approve, a general waiver of statutory or regulatory
requirements under section 189(i)(4)?
(a) A Governor may request a general waiver in consultation with
appropriate chief elected officials:
(1) By submitting a waiver plan which may accompany the State's WIA
5-year strategic Plan; or
(2) After a State's WIA Plan is approved, by directly submitting a
waiver plan.
(b) A Governor's waiver request may seek waivers for the entire
State or for one or more local areas.
(c) A Governor requesting a general waiver must submit to the
Secretary a plan to improve the Statewide workforce investment system
that:
(1) Identifies the statutory or regulatory requirements for which a
waiver is requested and the goals that the State or local area, as
appropriate, intends to achieve as a result of the waiver and how those
goals relate to the Strategic Plan goals;
(2) Describes the actions that the State or local area, as
appropriate, has undertaken to remove State or local statutory or
regulatory barriers;
(3) Describes the goals of the waiver and the expected programmatic
outcomes if the request is granted;
(4) Describes the individuals affected by the waiver; and
(5) Describes the processes used to:
(i) Monitor the progress in implementing the waiver;
(ii) Provide notice to any Local Board affected by the waiver; and
(iii) Provide any Local Board affected by the waiver an opportunity
to comment on the request.
(d) The Secretary issues a decision on a waiver request within 90
days after the receipt of the original waiver request.
(e) The Secretary will approve a waiver request if and only to the
extent that:
(1) The Secretary determines that the requirements for which a
waiver is requested impede the ability of either the State or local
area to implement the State's plan to improve the Statewide workforce
investment system;
(2) The Secretary determines that the waiver plan meets all of the
requirements of WIA section 189(i)(4) and Secs. 661.400-661.420 of this
subpart; and
(3) The State has executed a memorandum of understanding with the
Secretary requiring the State to meet, or ensure that the local area
meets, agreed-upon outcomes and to implement other appropriate measures
to ensure accountability.
(g) The Secretary will issue guidelines under which the States may
request general waivers of WIA and Wagner-Peyser requirements. (WIA
sec. 189(i).)
Sec. 661.430 Under what conditions may the Governor submit a Workforce
Flexibility Plan?
(a) A State may submit to the Secretary, and the Secretary may
approve, a workforce flexibility (work-flex) plan under which the State
is authorized to waive, in accordance with the plan:
(1) Any of the statutory or regulatory requirements under title I
of WIA applicable to local areas, if the local area requests the waiver
in a waiver application, except for:
(i) Requirements relating to the basic purposes of title I of WIA;
(ii) Wage and labor standards;
(iii) Grievance procedures and judicial review;
(iv) Nondiscrimination;
(v) Eligibility of participants;
(vi) Allocation of funds to local areas;
(vii) Establishment and functions of local areas and local boards;
(viii) Review and approval of local plans;
(ix) Worker rights, participation, and protection; and
(x) Any of the statutory provisions essential to the key reform
principles embodied in the Workforce Investment Act, described in
Sec. 661.400.
(2) Any of the statutory or regulatory requirements applicable to
the State under sec. 8 through 10 of the Wagner-Peyser Act (29 U.S.C.
49g-49i), except for requirements relating to:
(i) The provision of services to unemployment insurance claimants
and veterans; and
(ii) Universal access to basic labor exchange services without cost
to job seekers; and
(3) Any of the statutory or regulatory requirements under the Older
Americans Act of 1965 (OAA) (42 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.), applicable to
State agencies on aging with respect to activities carried out using
funds allotted under OAA section 506(a)(3) (42 U.S.C. 3056d(a)(3)),
except for requirements relating to:
(i) The basic purposes of OAA;
(ii) Wage and labor standards;
(iii) Eligibility of participants in the activities; and
(iv) Standards for agreements.
(b) A State's workforce flexibility plan may accompany the State's
five-year
[[Page 18701]]
Strategic Plan or may be submitted separately. If it is submitted
separately, the workforce flexibility plan must identify related
provisions in the State's five-year Strategic Plan.
(c) A workforce flexibility plan submitted under paragraph (a) of
this section must include descriptions of:
(1) The process by which local areas in the State may submit and
obtain State approval of applications for waivers;
(2) The statutory and regulatory requirements of title I of WIA
that are likely to be waived by the State under the workforce
flexibility plan;
(3) The statutory and regulatory requirements of sections 8 through
10 of the Wagner-Peyser Act that are proposed for waiver, if any;
(4) The statutory and regulatory requirements of the Older
Americans Act of 1965 that are proposed for waiver, if any;
(5) The outcomes to be achieved by the waivers described in
paragraphs (c) (1) to (4) of this section # including, where
appropriate, revisions to adjusted levels of performance included in
the State or local plan under title I of WIA; and
(6) The measures to be taken to ensure appropriate accountability
for Federal funds in connection with the waivers.
(d) The Secretary may approve a workforce flexibility plan for a
period of up to five years.
(e) Before submitting a workforce flexibility plan to the Secretary
for approval, the State must provide adequate notice and a reasonable
opportunity for comment on the proposed waiver requests under the
workforce flexibility plan to all interested parties and to the general
public.
(f) The Secretary will issue guidelines under which States may
request designation as a work-flex State.
Sec. 661.440 What limitations apply to the State's Workforce
Flexibility Plan authority under WIA?
(a)(1) Under work-flex waiver authority a State must not waive the
WIA, Wagner-Peyser or Older Americans Act requirements which are
excepted from the work-flex waiver authority and described in
Sec. 661.430(a).
(2) Requests to waive statutory and regulatory requirements of
title I of WIA applicable at the State level may not be granted under
work-flex waiver authority granted to a State. Such requests may only
be granted by the Secretary under the general waiver authority
described at Secs. 661.410-661.420 of this subpart.
(b) As required in Sec. 661.430(c)(5), States must address the
outcomes to result from work-flex waivers as part of its workforce
flexibility plan. Once approved, a State's work-flex designation is
conditioned on the State demonstrating it has met the agreed-upon
outcomes contained in its workforce flexibility plan.
PART 662--DESCRIPTION OF THE ONE-STOP SYSTEM UNDER TITLE I OF THE
WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT
Subpart A--General Description of the One-Stop Delivery System
Sec.
662.100 What is the One-Stop delivery system?
Subpart B--One-Stop Partners and the Responsibilities of Partners
662.200 Who are the required One-Stop partners?
662.210 What other entities may serve as One-Stop partners?
662.220 What entity serves as the One-Stop partner for a particular
program in the local area?
662.230 What are the responsibilities of the required One-Stop
partners?
662.240 What are a program's applicable core services?
662.250 Where and to what extent must required One-Stop partners
make core services available?
662.260 What services, in addition to the applicable core services,
are to be provided by One-Stop partners through the One-Stop
delivery system?
662.270 How are the costs of providing services through the One-
Stop delivery system and the operating costs of the system to be
funded?
662.280 Does title I require One-Stop partners to use their funds
for individuals who are not eligible for the partner's program or
for services that are not authorized under the partner's program?
Subpart C--Memorandum of Understanding for the One-Stop Delivery System
662.300 What is the Memorandum of Understanding?
662.310 Is there a single MOU for the local area or are there to be
separate MOU's between the Local Board and each partner?
Subpart D--One-Stop Operators
662.400 Who is the One-Stop operator?
662.410 How is the One-Stop operator selected?
662.420 Under what limited conditions may the Local Board be
designated or certified as the One-Stop operator?
662.430 Under what conditions may existing One-Stop delivery
systems be certified to act as the One-Stop operator?
Authority: Section 506(c), Pub. L. 105-220; 20 U.S.C. 9276(c).
Subpart A--General Description of One-Stop Delivery System
Sec. 662.100 What is the One-Stop delivery system?
(a) In general, the One-Stop delivery system is a system under
which entities responsible for administering separate workforce
investment, educational, and other human resource programs and funding
streams (referred to as One-Stop partners) collaborate to create a
seamless system of service delivery that will enhance access to the
programs' services and improve long-term employment outcomes for
individuals receiving assistance.
(b) Title I of WIA assigns responsibilities at the local, State and
Federal level to ensure the creation and maintenance of a One-Stop
delivery system that enhances the range and quality of workforce
development services that are accessible to individuals seeking
assistance.
(c) The system must include at least one comprehensive physical
center in each local area that must provide the core services specified
in WIA section 134(d)(2), and must provide access to other programs and
activities carried out by the One-Stop partners.
(d) While each local area must have at least one comprehensive
center (and may have additional comprehensive centers), WIA section
134(c) allows for arrangements to supplement the center. These
arrangements may include:
(1) A network of affiliated sites that can provide one or more
partners' programs, services and activities at each site;
(2) A network of One-Stop partners through which each partner
provides services that are linked, physically or technologically, to an
affiliated site that assures individuals are provided information on
the availability of core services in the local area; and
(3) Specialized centers that address specific needs, such as those
of dislocated workers.
(e) The design of the local area's One-Stop delivery system,
including the number of comprehensive centers and the supplementary
arrangements, must be described in the local plan and be consistent
with the memorandum of understanding executed with the One-Stop
partners.
Subpart B--One-Stop Partners and the Responsibilities of Partners
Sec. 662.200 Who are the required One-Stop partners?
(a) WIA section 121(b)(1) identifies the entities that are required
partners in the local One-Stop systems.
[[Page 18702]]
(b) The required partners are the entities that carry out:
(1) Programs authorized under title I of WIA, serving:
(i) Adults;
(ii) Dislocated workers;
(iii) Youth;
(iv) Job Corps;
(v) Native American programs;
(vi) Migrant and seasonal farmworker programs; and
(vii) Veterans' workforce programs; (WIA sec. 121(b)(1)(B)(i).)
(2) Programs authorized under the Wagner-Peyser Act (29 U.S.C. 49
et seq.); (WIA sec. 121(b)(1)(B)(ii).)
(3) Adult education and literacy activities authorized under title
II of WIA; (WIA sec. 121(b)(1)(B)(iii).)
(4) Vocational rehabilitation programs authorized under parts A and
B of title I of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 720 et seq.); (WIA
sec. 121(b)(1)(B)(iv).)
(5) Welfare-to-work programs authorized under sec. 403(a)(5) of the
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 603(a)(5) et seq.); (WIA sec.
121(b)(1)(B)(v).)
(6) Senior community service employment activities authorized under
title V of the Older Americans Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3056 et seq.);
(WIA sec. 121(b)(1)(B)(vi).)
(7) Postsecondary vocational education activities under the Carl D.
Perkins Vocational and Applied Technology Education Act (20 U.S.C. 2301
et seq.); (WIA sec. 121(b)(1)(B)(vii).)
(8) Trade Adjustment Assistance and NAFTA Transitional Adjustment
Assistance activities authorized under chapter 2 of title II of the
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2271 et seq.); (WIA sec.
121(b)(1)(B)(viii).)
(9) Activities authorized under chapter 41 of title 38, U.S.C.
(local veterans' employment representatives and disabled veterans
outreach programs); (WIA sec. 121(b)(1)(B)(ix).)
(10) Employment and training activities carried out under the
Community Services Block Grant (42 U.S.C. 9901 et seq.); (WIA sec.
121(b)(1)(B)(x).)
(11) Employment and training activities carried out by the
Department of Housing and Urban Development; (WIA sec.
121(b)(1)(B)(xi).) and
(12) Programs authorized under State unemployment compensation laws
(in accordance with applicable Federal law); (WIA sec.
121(b)(1)(B)(xii).)
Sec. 662.210 What other entities may serve as One-Stop partners?
(a) WIA provides that other entities that carry out a human
resource program, including Federal, State, or local programs and
programs in the private sector may serve as additional partners in the
One-Stop system if the Local Board and chief elected official(s)
approve the entity's participation.
(b) Additional partners may include:
(1) TANF programs authorized under part A of title IV of the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
(2) Employment and training programs authorized under section
6(d)(4) of the Food Stamp Act of 1977 (7 U.S.C. 2015(d)(4));
(3) Work programs authorized under section 6(o) of the Food Stamp
Act of 1977 (7 U.S.C. 2015(o));
(4) Programs authorized under the National and Community Service
Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12501 et seq.); and
(5) other appropriate programs, including programs related to
transportation and housing. (WIA section 121(b)(2).)
Sec. 662.220 What entity serves as the One-Stop partner for a
particular program in the local area?
(a) The ``entity'' that carries out the program and activities
listed in Secs. 662.200 and 662.210 of this subpart, and, therefore,
serves as the One-Stop partner is the grant recipient, administrative
entity or organization responsible for administering the funds of the
specified program in the local area. The term ``entity'' does not
include the service providers that contract with or are subrecipients
of the local administrative entity. For programs that do not include
local administrative entities, the responsible State Agency should be
the partner. Specific entities for specific programs are identified in
paragraph (b) of this section.
(b)(1) For title II of WIA, the entity that carries out the program
for the purposes of paragraph (a) of this section is the State eligible
entity. The State eligible entity may designate an eligible provider as
the ``entity'' for this purpose;
(2) For title I, Part A, of the Rehabilitation Act, the entity that
carries out the program for the purposes of paragraph (a) of this
section is the designated State agency or designated unit specified
under section 101(a)(2) that is primarily concerned with vocational
rehabilitation, or vocational and other rehabilitation, of individuals
with disabilities; and
(3) Under WIA, the national programs, including Job Corps, the WIA
Indian and Native American program, the Migrant and Seasonal
Farmworkers program, and the Veterans' Workforce Investment program,
are required One-Stop partners. Local Boards must include them in the
One-Stop delivery system where they are present in their local area. In
local areas where the national programs are not present, States and
Local Boards should take steps to ensure that customer groups served by
these programs have access to services through the One-Stop delivery
system.
Sec. 662.230 What are the responsibilities of the required One-Stop
partners?
All required partners must:
(a) Make available to participants through the One-Stop delivery
system the core services that are applicable to the partner's programs;
(WIA section 121(b)(1)(A).)
(b) Use a portion of funds made available to the partner's program,
to the extent not inconsistent with the Federal law authorizing the
partner's program, to:
(1) Create and maintain the One-Stop delivery system; and
(2) Provide core services; (WIA sec. 134(d)(1)(B).)
(c) Enter into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the Local
Board relating to the operation of the One-Stop system that meets the
requirements of Sec. 662.300, including a description of services, how
the cost of the identified services and operating costs of the system
will be funded, and methods for referrals (WIA sec. 121(c));
(d) Participate in the operation of the One-Stop system consistent
with the terms of the MOU and requirements of authorizing laws; (WIA
sec. 121(b)(1)(B).) and
(e) Serve as a representative on the local workforce investment
board. (WIA sec. 117(b)(2)(A)(vi).)
Sec. 662.240 What are a program's applicable core services?
(a) The core services applicable to any One-Stop partner program
are those services described in paragraph (b) of this section, that are
authorized and provided under the partner's program.
(b) The core services identified in section 134(d)(2) of the WIA
are:
(1) Determinations of whether the individuals are eligible to
receive assistance under subtitle B of title I of WIA;
(2) Outreach, intake (which may include worker profiling), and
orientation to the information and other services available through the
One-Stop delivery system;
(3) Initial assessment of skill levels, aptitudes, abilities, and
supportive service needs;
(4) Job search and placement assistance, and where appropriate,
career counseling;
(5) Provision of employment statistics information, including the
provision of
[[Page 18703]]
accurate information relating to local, regional, and national labor
market areas, including--
(i) Job vacancy listings in such labor market areas;
(ii) Information on job skills necessary to obtain the listed jobs;
and
(iii) Information relating to local occupations in demand and the
earnings and skill requirements for such occupations;
(6) Provision of program performance information and program cost
information on:
(i) Eligible providers of training services described in WIA
section 122;
(ii) Eligible providers of youth activities described in WIA
section 123;
(iii) Providers of adult education described in title II;
(iv) Providers of postsecondary vocational education activities and
vocational education activities available to school dropouts under the
Carl D. Perkins Vocational and Applied Technology Education Act (20
U.S.C. 2301 et seq.); and
(v) Providers of vocational rehabilitation program activities
described in title I of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 720
et seq.);
(7) Provision of information on how the local area is performing on
the local performance measures and any additional performance
information with respect to the One-Stop delivery system in the local
area;
(8) Provision of accurate information relating to the availability
of supportive services, including, at a minimum, child care and
transportation, available in the local area, and referral to such
services, as appropriate;
(9) Provision of information regarding filing claims for
unemployment compensation;
(10) Assistance in establishing eligibility for--
(i) Welfare-to-work activities authorized under section 403(a)(5)
of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 603(a)(5)) available in the local
area; and
(ii) Programs of financial aid assistance for training and
education programs that are not funded under this Act and are available
in the local area; and
(11) Followup services, including counseling regarding the
workplace, for participants in workforce investment activities
authorized under subtitle (B) of title I of WIA who are placed in
unsubsidized employment, for not less than 12 months after the first
day of the employment, as appropriate.
Sec. 662.250 Where and to what extent must required One-Stop partners
make core services available?
(a) At a minimum, the core services that are applicable to the
program of the partner under Sec. 662.220, and that are in addition to
the basic labor exchange services traditionally provided in the local
area under the Wagner-Peyser program, must be made available at the
comprehensive One-Stop center. These services must be made available to
individuals attributable to the partner's program who seek assistance
at the center. The adult and dislocated worker program partners are
required to make all of the core services listed in Sec. 662.240
available at the center in accordance with 20 CFR 663.100(b)(1).
(b) The applicable core services may be made available by the
provision of appropriate technology at the comprehensive One-Stop
center, by co-locating personnel at the center, cross-training of
staff, or through a cost reimbursement or other agreement between
service providers at the comprehensive One-Stop center and the partner,
as described in the MOU.
(c) The responsibility of the partner for the provision of core
services must be proportionate to the use of the services at the
comprehensive One-Stop center by the individuals attributable to the
partner's program. The specific method of determining each partner's
proportionate responsibility must be described in the MOU.
(d) For purposes of this part, individuals attributable to the
partner's program may include individuals who are referred through the
comprehensive One-Stop center and enrolled in the partner's program
after the receipt of core services, who have been enrolled in the
partner's program prior to receipt of the applicable core services at
the center, who meet the eligibility criteria for the partner's program
and who receive an applicable core service, or who meet an alternative
definition described in the MOU.
(e) Under the MOU, the provision of applicable core services at the
Center by the One-Stop partner may be supplemented by the provision of
such services through the networks of affiliated sites and networks of
One-Stop partners described in WIA section 134(c)(2).
Sec. 662.260 What services, in addition to the applicable core
services, are to be provided by One-Stop partners through the One-Stop
delivery system?
In addition to the provision of core services, One-Stop partners
must provide access to the other activities and programs carried out
under the partner's authorizing laws. The access to these services must
be described in the local MOU. 20 CFR part 663 describes the specific
requirements relating to the provision of core, intensive, and training
services through the One-Stop system that apply to the adult and the
dislocated worker programs authorized under title I of WIA. Additional
requirements apply to the provision of all labor exchange services
under the Wagner-Peyser Act. (WIA sec. 134(c)(1)(D).)
Sec. 662.270 How are the costs of providing services through the One-
Stop delivery system and the operating costs of the system to be
funded?
The MOU must describe the particular funding arrangements for
services and operating costs of the One-Stop delivery system. Each
partner must contribute a fair share of the operating costs of the One-
Stop delivery system proportionate to the use of the system by
individuals attributable to the partner's program. There are a number
of methods, consistent with the requirements of the relevant OMB
circulars, that may be used for allocating costs among the partners.
Some of these methodologies include allocations based on direct
charges, cost pooling, indirect cost rates and activity-based cost
allocation plans. Additional guidance relating to cost allocation
methods may be issued by the Department in consultation with the other
appropriate Federal agencies.
Sec. 662.280 Does title I require One-Stop partners to use their funds
for individuals who are not eligible for the partner's program or for
services that are not authorized under the partner's program?
No. The requirements of the partner's program continue to apply.
The Act intends to create a seamless service delivery system for
individuals seeking workforce development services by linking the One-
Stop partners in the One-Stop delivery system. While the overall effect
is to provide universal access to core services, the resources of each
partner may only be used to provide services that are authorized and
provided under the partner's program to individuals who are eligible
under such program. (WIA sec. 121(b)(1).)
Subpart C--Memorandum of Understanding of the One-Stop Delivery
System
Sec. 662.300 What is the Memorandum of Understanding?
(a) The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is an agreement developed
and executed between the Local Board, with the agreement of the
[[Page 18704]]
chief elected official, and the One-Stop partners relating to the
operation of the One-Stop delivery system in the local area.
(b) The MOU must contain the provisions required by WIA section
121(c)(2). These provisions cover services to be provided through the
One-Stop delivery system; the funding of the services and operating
costs of the system; and methods for referring individuals between the
One-Stop operators and partners. The MOU's provisions also must
determine the duration and procedures for amending the MOU, and may
contain any other provisions that are consistent with WIA title I and
these regulations agreed to by the parties. (WIA sec. 121(c).)
Sec. 662.310 Is there a single MOU for the local area or are there to
be separate MOU's between the Local Board and each partner?
(a) A single ``umbrella'' MOU may be developed that addresses the
issues relating to the local One-Stop delivery system for the Local
Board and all partners, or the Local Board and the partners may decide
to enter into separate agreements between the Local Board and one or
more partners. Under either approach, the requirements described in
Sec. 662.310 apply. Since funds are generally appropriated annually,
financial agreements may be negotiated with each partner annually to
clarify funding of services and operating costs of the system under the
MOU.
(b) WIA emphasizes full and effective partnerships between Local
Boards and One-Stop partners. Local Boards and partners must enter into
good-faith negotiations. Local Boards and partners may request
assistance from a State agency responsible for administering the
partner program, the Governor, State Board, or other appropriate
parties. The State agencies, the State Board, and the Governor may also
consult with the appropriate Federal agencies to address impasse
situations after exhausting other alternatives. The Local Board and
partners must document the negotiations and efforts that have taken
place. Any failure to execute an MOU between a Local Board and a
required partner must be reported by the Local Board and the required
partner to the Governor or State Board, and the State agency
responsible for administering the partner's program, and by the
Governor or the State Board and the responsible State agency to the
Secretary of Labor and to the head of any other Federal agency with
responsibility for oversight of a partner's program. (WIA sec. 121(c).)
(c) If an impasse has not been resolved through the alternatives
available under this section any partner that fails to execute an MOU
may not be permitted to serve on the Local Board. In addition, any
local area in which a Local Board has failed to execute an MOU with all
of the required partners is not eligible for State incentive grants
awarded on the basis of local coordination of activities under 20 CFR
665.200(d)(2).
Subpart D--One-Stop Operators
Sec. 662.400 Who is the One-Stop operator?
(a) The One-Stop operator is the entity that performs the role
described in paragraph (c) of this section. The types of entities that
may be selected to be the One-Stop operator include:
(1) A postsecondary educational institution;
(2) An Employment Service agency established under the Wagner-
Peyser Act on behalf of the local office of the agency;
(3) A private, nonprofit organization (including a community-based
organization);
(4) A private for-profit entity;
(5) A government agency; and
(6) Another interested organization or entity.
(b) One-Stop operators may be a single entity or a consortium of
entities and may operate one or more One-Stop centers. In addition,
there may be more than one One-Stop operator in a local area.
(c) The agreement between the Local Board and the One-Stop operator
shall specify the operator's role. That role may range between simply
coordinating service providers within the center to being the primary
provider of services within the center. (WIA sec. 121(d).)
Sec. 662.410 How is the One-Stop operator selected?
(a) The Local Board, with the agreement of the chief elected
official, must designate and certify One-Stop operators in each local
area.
(b) The One-Stop operator is designated or certified:
(1) Through a competitive process, or
(2) Under an agreement between the Local Board and a consortium of
entities that includes at least three or more of the required One-Stop
partners identified at Sec. 662.200. (WIA sec. 121(d).)
Sec. 662.420 Under what limited conditions may the Local Board be
designated or certified as the One-Stop operator?
(a) The Local Board may be designated or certified as the One-Stop
operator only with the agreement of the chief elected official and the
Governor.
(b) The designation or certification must be made publicly, in
accordance with the requirements of the ``sunshine provision'' in WIA
section 117(e), and must be reviewed whenever the biennial
certification of the Local Board is made under 20 CFR 663.300(a). (WIA
sec. 117(f)(2).)
Sec. 662.430 Under what conditions may existing One-Stop delivery
systems be certified to act as the One-Stop operator?
Under WIA section 121(e), the Local Board, the chief elected
official and the Governor may agree to certify an entity as a One-Stop
operator under the following circumstances:
(a) A One-Stop delivery system, consistent with the scope and
meaning of the term in WIA section 134(c), existed in the local area
prior to August 7, 1998;
(b) The certification is consistent with the requirements of:
(1) WIA section 121(b) and;
(2) the Memorandum(s) of Understanding; and
(c) The certification must be made publicly, in accordance with the
``sunshine provision'' at WIA section 117(e). (WIA section 121(e).)
PART 663--ADULT AND DISLOCATED WORKER ACTIVITIES UNDER TITLE I OF
THE WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT
Subpart A-- Delivery of Adult and Dislocated Worker Services Through
the One-Stop Delivery System
Sec.
663.100 What is the role of the adult and dislocated worker program
in the One-Stop delivery system?
663.105 When must adults and dislocated workers be registered?
663.110 What are the eligibility criteria for adults in the adult
and dislocated worker program?
663.115 What are the eligibility criteria for dislocated workers in
the Adult and Dislocated worker program?
663.120 Are displaced homemakers eligible for dislocated worker
activities under WIA?
663.145 What services are WIA title I adult and dislocated workers
formula funds used to provide?
663.150 What core services must be provided to adults and
dislocated workers?
663.155 How are core services delivered?
663.160 Are there particular core services an individual must
receive before receiving intensive services under WIA section
134(d)(3)?
663.165 How long must an individual be in core services in order to
be eligible for intensive services?
Subpart B--Intensive Services
663.200 What are intensive services for adults and dislocated
workers?
663.210 How are intensive services delivered?
[[Page 18705]]
663.220 Who may receive intensive services?
663.230 What criteria must be used to determine whether an employed
worker needs intensive services to obtain or retain employment
leading to ``self-sufficiency?
663.240 Are there particular intensive services an individual must
receive prior to receiving training services under WIA section
134(d)(4)(A)(i)?
663.245 What is the individual employment plan?
663.250 How long must an individual participant be in intensive
services to be eligible for training services?
Subpart C--Training Services
663.300 What are training services for adults and dislocated
workers ?
663.310 Who may receive training services?
663.320 What are the requirements for coordination of WIA training
funds and other grant assistance?
Subpart D--Individual Training Accounts
663.400 How are training services provided?
663.410 What is an Individual Training Account?
663.420 Can the duration and amount of ITA's be limited?
663.430 Under what circumstances may mechanisms other than ITA's be
used to provide training services?
663.440 What are the requirements for consumer choice?
Subpart E--Eligible Training Providers
663.500 What is the purpose of this subpart?
663.505 What are eligible providers of training services?
663.508 What is a ``program of training services''?
663.510 Who is responsible for managing the eligible provider
process?
663.515 What is the process for initial determination of provider
eligibility?
663.530 Is there a time limit on the period of initial eligibility
for training providers?
663.535 What is the process for determination of the subsequent
eligibility of a provider?
663.540 What kind of performance and cost information is required
for determinations of subsequent eligibility?
663.550 How is eligible provider information developed and
maintained?
663.555 How is the State list disseminated?
663.565 May an eligible training provider lose its eligibility?
663.570 What is the consumer reports system?
663.575 In what ways can a Local Board supplement the information
available from the State list?
663.585 May individuals choose training providers located outside
of the local area?
663.590 May a community-based organization (CBO) be included on an
eligible provider list?
663.595 What requirements apply to providers of OJT and customized
training?
Subpart F--Priority and Special Populations
663.600 What priority must be given to low-income adults and public
assistance recipients served with adult funds under title I?
663.610 Does the priority for use of adult funds also apply to
dislocated worker funds?
663.620 How do the Welfare-to-Work program and the TANF program
relate to the One-Stop delivery system?
663.630 How does a displaced homemaker qualify for services under
title I?
663.640 May a disabled individual whose family does not meet income
eligibility criteria under the Act be eligible for priority as a low
income adult?
Subpart G--On-the-Job Training (OJT) and Customized Training
663.700 What are the requirements for on-the-job training (OJT)?
663.705 What are the requirements for OJT contracts for employed
workers?
663.710 What conditions govern OJT payments to employers?
663.715 What is customized training?
663.720 What are the requirements for customized training for
employed workers?
Subpart H--Supportive Services
663.800 What are supportive services for adults and dislocated
workers?
663.805 When may supportive services be provided to participants?
663.810 Are there limits on the amounts or duration of funds for
supportive services?
663.815 What are needs-related payments?
663.820 What are the eligibility requirements for adults to receive
needs-related payments?
663.825 What are the eligibility requirements for dislocated
workers to receive needs-related payments?
663.830 May needs-related payments be paid while a participant is
waiting to start training classes?
663.840 How is the level of needs-related payments determined?
Authority: Section 506(c), Pub. L. 105-220; 20 U.S.C. 9276(c).
Subpart A--Delivery of Adult and Dislocated Worker Services through
the One-Stop Delivery System
Sec. 663.100 What is the role of the adult and dislocated worker
program in the One-Stop delivery system?
(a) The One-Stop system is the basic delivery system for adult and
dislocated worker services. Through this system, adults and dislocated
workers can access a continuum of services. The services are organized
into three levels: core, intensive, and training.
(b) The chief elected official or his/her designee(s), as the local
grant recipient(s) for the adult and dislocated worker programs, is a
required One-Stop partner and is subject to the provisions relating to
such partners described in 20 CFR part 662. Consistent with those
provisions:
(1) Core services for adults and dislocated workers must be made
available in at least one comprehensive One-Stop center in each local
workforce investment area. Services may also be available elsewhere,
either at affiliated sites or at specialized centers. For example,
specialized centers may be established to serve workers being
dislocated from a particular employer or industry, or to serve
residents of public housing.
(2) The One-Stop centers also make intensive services available to
adults and dislocated workers, as needed, either by the One-Stop
operator directly or through contracts with service providers that are
approved by the Local Board.
(3) Through the One-Stop system, adults and dislocated workers
needing training are provided Individual Training Accounts (ITA's) and
access to lists of eligible providers of training. These lists contain
quality consumer information, including cost and performance
information for each of the providers, so that participants can make
informed choices on where to use their ITA's. (ITA's are more fully
discussed in subpart D of this part.)
Sec. 663.105 When must adults and dislocated workers be registered?
(a) Registration is the process for collecting information for
supporting a determination of eligibility. This information may be
collected through methods that include electronic data transfer,
personal interview, or an individual's application.
(b) Adults and dislocated workers who receive services funded under
title I other than self-service or informational activities must be
registered and determined eligible.
(c) EEO data must be collected on individuals during the
registration process.
Sec. 663.110 What are the eligibility criteria for adults in the adult
and dislocated worker program?
To be an eligible adult in the adult and dislocated worker program,
an individual must be 18 years of age or older. To be eligible for the
dislocated worker program, an eligible adult must meet the criteria of
Sec. 663.115 of this subpart.
[[Page 18706]]
Sec. 663.115 What are the eligibility criteria for dislocated workers
in the adult and dislocated worker program?
(a) To be an eligible dislocated worker in the adult and dislocated
worker program, an individual must meet the definition of ``dislocated
worker'' at WIA section 101(9).
(b) Governors and Local Boards may establish policies and
procedures for One-Stop operators to use in determining an individual's
eligibility as a dislocated worker, consistent with the definition at
WIA section 101(9). These policies and procedures may address such
conditions as:
(1) What constitutes a ``general announcement'' of plant closing
under WIA section 101(9)(B)(ii) or (iii); and (2) What constitutes
``unemployed as a result of general economic conditions in the
community in which the individual resides or because of natural
disasters' for determining the eligibility of self-employed
individuals, including family members and farm or ranch hands, under
WIA section 101(9)(C).
Sec. 663.120 Are displaced homemakers eligible for dislocated worker
activities under WIA?
(a) Yes. There are two significant differences from the eligibility
requirements under the Job Training Partnership Act.
(b) Under the dislocated worker program in JTPA, displaced
homemakers are defined as ``additional dislocated workers'' and are
only eligible to receive services if the Governor determines that
providing such services would not adversely affect the delivery of
services to the other eligible dislocated workers. Under WIA section
101(9), displaced homemakers who meet the definition at WIA section
101(10) are eligible dislocated workers without any additional
determination.
(c) The definition of displaced homemaker under JTPA included
individuals who had been dependent upon public assistance under Aid for
Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) as well as those who had been
dependent on the income of another family member. The definition in WIA
section 101(10) includes only those individuals who were dependent on a
family member's income. Those individuals who have been dependent on
public assistance may be served in the adult program.
Sec. 663.145 What services are WIA title I adult and dislocated
workers formula funds used to provide?
(a) WIA title I formula funds allocated to local areas for adults
and dislocated workers must be used to provide core, intensive and
training services through the One-Stop delivery system. Local Boards
determine the most appropriate mix of these services, but all three
types must be available for both adults and dislocated workers.
(b) WIA title I funds may also be used to provide the other
services described in WIA section 134(e):
(1) Discretionary One-Stop delivery activities, including:
(i) Customized screening and referral of qualified participants in
training services to employment; and
(ii) Customized employment-related services to employers on a fee-
for-service basis that are in addition to labor exchange services
available to employers under the Wagner-Peyser Act.
(2) Supportive services, including needs-related payments, as
described in subpart H of this part.
Sec. 663.150 What core services must be provided to adults and
dislocated workers?
(a) At a minimum, all of the core services described in WIA section
134(d)(2) and 20 CFR 662.220 must be provided in each local area
through the One-Stop delivery system.
(b) Followup services must be made available, for a minimum of 12
months following the first day of employment, to registered
participants who are placed in unsubsidized employment.
Sec. 663.155 How are core services delivered?
Core services must be provided through the One-Stop delivery
system. Core services may be provided directly by the One-Stop operator
or through contracts with service providers that are approved by the
Local Board. The Local Board may only be a provider of core services
when approved by the chief elected official and the Governor in
accordance with the requirements of WIA section 117(f)(2) and 20 CFR
661.310.
Sec. 663.160 Are there particular core services an individual must
receive before receiving intensive services under WIA section
134(d)(3)?
(a) Yes. At a minimum, an individual must receive at least one core
service, such as an initial assessment or job search and placement
assistance, before receiving intensive services. The initial assessment
determines the individual's skill levels, aptitudes, and supportive
services needs. The job search and placement assistance helps the
individual determine whether he or she is unable to obtain employment,
and thus requires more intensive services to obtain employment. The
decision on which core services to provide, and the timing of their
delivery, may be made on a case-by-case basis at the local level
depending upon the needs of the participant.
(b) A determination of the need for intensive services under
Sec. 663.220, as established by the initial assessment or the
individual's inability to obtain employment through the core services
provided, must be contained in the participant's case file.
Sec. 663.165 How long must an individual be in core services in order
to be eligible for intensive services?
There is no Federally-required minimum time period for
participation in core services before receiving intensive services.
[WIA section 134(d)(3).]
Subpart B--Intensive Services
Sec. 663.200 What are intensive services for adults and dislocated
workers?
(a) Intensive services are listed in WIA section 134(d)(3)(C). The
list in the Act is not all-inclusive and other intensive services, such
as out-of-area job search assistance, literacy activities related to
basic workforce readiness, relocation assistance, internships, and work
experience may be provided, based on an assessment or individual
employment plan.
(b) For the purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, work
experience is a planned, structured learning experience that takes
place in a workplace for a limited period of time. Work experience may
be paid or unpaid, as appropriate. A work experience workplace may be
in the private for profit sector, the non-profit sector, or the public
sector.
Sec. 663.210 How are intensive services delivered?
(a) Intensive services must be provided through the One-Stop
delivery system. Intensive services may be provided directly by the
One-Stop operator or through contracts with service providers that are
approved by the Local Board. (WIA secs. 117(d)(2)(D) and 134(d)(3)(B).)
(b) The Local Board may only be a provider of intensive services
when approved by the chief elected official and the Governor in
accordance with WIA section 117(f)(2) and 20 CFR 661.310.
Sec. 663.220 Who may receive intensive services?
There are two categories of adults and dislocated workers who may
receive intensive services:
(a) Adults and dislocated workers who are unemployed, have received
at least one core service and are unable to obtain employment through
core
[[Page 18707]]
services, and are determined by a One-Stop operator to be in need of
more intensive services to obtain employment; and
(b) Adults and dislocated workers who are employed, have received
at least one core service, and are determined by a One-Stop operator to
be in need of intensive services to obtain or retain employment that
leads to self-sufficiency, as described in Sec. 663.230.
Sec. 663.230 What criteria must be used to determine whether an
employed worker needs intensive services to obtain or retain employment
leading to ``self-sufficiency''?
State Boards or Local Boards must set the criteria for determining
whether employment leads to self-sufficiency. At a minimum, such
criteria must provide that self-sufficiency means employment that pays
at least the lower living standard income level, as defined in WIA
section 101(24). Self-sufficiency for a dislocated worker may be
defined in relation to a percentage of the layoff wage.
Sec. 663.240 Are there particular intensive services an individual
must receive prior to receiving training services under WIA section
134(d)(4)(A)(i)?
(a) Yes. At a minimum, an individual must receive at least one
intensive service, such as development of an individual employment plan
with a case manager or individual counseling and career planning,
before the individual may receive training services.
(b) The case file must contain a determination of need for training
services under Sec. 663.310, as identified in the individual employment
plan, comprehensive assessment, or through any other intensive service
received.
Sec. 663.245 What is the individual employment plan?
The individual employment plan is an ongoing strategy jointly
developed by the participant and the case manager that identifies the
participant's employment goals, the appropriate achievement objectives,
and the appropriate combination of services for the participant to
achieve the employment goals.
Sec. 663.250 How long must an individual participant be in intensive
services to be eligible for training services?
There is no Federally-required minimum time period for
participation in intensive services before receiving training services.
(WIA section 134(d)(4)(A)(i).)
Subpart C--Training Services
Sec. 663.300 What are training services for adults and dislocated
workers?
Training services are listed in WIA section 134(d)(4)(D). The list
in the Act is not all-inclusive and additional training services may be
provided.
Sec. 663.310 Who may receive training services?
Training services may be made available to employed and unemployed
adults and dislocated workers who:
(a) Have met the eligibility requirements for intensive services,
have received at least one intensive service under Sec. 663.240, and
have been determined to be unable to obtain or retain employment
through such services;
(b) After an interview, evaluation, or assessment, and case
management, have been determined by a One-Stop operator or One-Stop
partner, to be in need of training services and to have the skills and
qualifications to successfully complete the selected training program;
(c) Select a program of training services that is directly linked
to the employment opportunities either in the local area or in another
area to which the individual is willing to relocate;
(d) Are unable to obtain grant assistance from other sources to pay
the costs of such training, including Federal Pell Grants established
under title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, or require WIA
assistance in addition to other sources of grant assistance, including
Federal Pell Grants (provisions relating to fund coordination are found
at Sec. 663.320 and WIA section 134(d)(4)(B)); and
(e) For individuals whose services are provided through the adult
funding stream, are determined eligible in accordance with the State
and local priority system, if any, in effect for adults under WIA
section 134(d)(4)(E) and Sec. 663.600. [WIA section 134(d)(4)(A).]
Sec. 663.320 What are the requirements for coordination of WIA
training funds and other grant assistance?
(a) WIA funding for training is limited to participants who:
(1) Are unable to obtain grant assistance from other sources to pay
the costs of their training; or
(2) Require assistance beyond that available under grant assistance
from other sources to pay the costs of such training. Program operators
and training providers must coordinate funds available to pay for
training as described in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
(b) Program operators must coordinate training funds available and
make funding arrangements with One-Stop partners and other entities to
apply the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section. Training
providers must consider the availability of Pell Grants and other
sources of grants to pay for training costs, so that WIA funds
supplement other sources of training grants.
(c) A WIA participant may enroll in WIA-funded training while his/
her application for a Pell Grant is pending as long as the One-Stop
operator has made arrangements with the training provider and the WIA
participant regarding allocation of the Pell Grant, if it is
subsequently awarded. In that case, the training provider must
reimburse the One-Stop operator the WIA funds used to underwrite the
training for the amount the Pell Grant covers. Reimbursement is not
required from the portion of Pell Grant assistance disbursed to the WIA
participant for education-related expenses. (WIA section 134(d)(4)(B).)
Subpart D--Individual Training Accounts
Sec. 663.400 How are training services provided?
Except under the three conditions described in WIA section
134(d)(4)(G)(ii) and Sec. 663.430(a), the Individual Training Account
(ITA) is established for eligible individuals to finance training
services. Local Boards may only provide training services under
Sec. 663.430 if they receive a waiver from the Governor and meet the
requirements of 20 CFR 661.310 and WIA section 117(f)(1). (WIA section
134(d)(4)(G).)
Sec. 663.410 What is an Individual Training Account?
The ITA is established on behalf of a participant. WIA title I
adult and dislocated workers purchase training services from eligible
providers they select in consultation with the case manager. Payments
from ITA's may be made in a variety of ways, including the electronic
transfer of funds through financial institutions, vouchers, or other
appropriate methods. Payments may also be made incrementally; through
payment of a portion of the costs at different points in the training
course. (WIA section 134(d)(4)(G).)
Sec. 663.420 Can the duration and amount of ITA's be limited?
(a) Yes. The State or Local Board may impose limits on ITA's, such
as limitations on the dollar amount and/or duration.
(b) Limits to ITA's may be established in different ways:
[[Page 18708]]
(1) There may be a limit for an individual participant that is
based on the needs identified in the individual employment plan; or
(2) There may be a policy decision by the State Board or Local
Board to establish a range of amounts and/or a maximum amount
applicable to all ITA's.
(c) Limitations established by State or Local Board policies must
be described in the State or Local Plan, respectively, but should not
be implemented in a manner that undermines the Act's requirement that
training services are provided in a manner that maximizes customer
choice in the selection of an eligible training provider.
Sec. 663.430 Under what circumstances may mechanisms other than ITA's
be used to provide training services?
(a) Contracts for services may be used instead of ITA's only when
one of the following three exceptions applies:
(1) When the services provided are on-the-job training (OJT) or
customized training;
(2) When the Local Board determines that there are an insufficient
number of eligible providers in the local area to accomplish the
purpose of a system of ITA's. The Local Plan must describe the process
to be used in selecting the providers under a contract for services.
This process must include a public comment period for interested
providers of at least 30 days;
(3) When the Local Board determines that there is a training
services program of demonstrated effectiveness offered in the area by a
community-based organization (CBO) or another private organization to
serve special participant populations that face multiple barriers to
employment, as described in paragraph (b) in this section. The Local
Board must develop criteria to be used in determining demonstrated
effectiveness, particularly as it applies to the special participant
population to be served. The criteria may include:
(i) Financial stability of the organization;
(ii) Demonstrated performance in measures appropriate to the
program including program completion rate; attainment of the skills,
certificates or degrees the program is designed to provide; placement
after training in unsubsidized employment; and retention in employment;
and
(iii) How the specific program relates to the workforce investment
needs identified in the local plan.
(b) Under paragraph (a)(3) of this section, special participant
populations that face multiple barriers to employment are populations
of low-income individuals that are included in one or more of the
following categories:
(1) Individuals with substantial language or cultural barriers;
(2) Offenders;
(3) Homeless individuals; and
(4) Other hard-to-serve populations as defined by the Governor.
Sec. 663.440 What are the requirements for consumer choice?
(a) Training services, whether under ITA's or under contract, must
be provided in a manner that maximizes informed consumer choice in
selecting an eligible provider.
(b) Each Local Board, through the One-Stop center, must make
available to customers the State list of eligible providers required in
WIA section 122(e). The list includes a description of the programs
through which the providers may offer the training services, the
information identifying eligible providers of on-the-job training and
customized training required under WIA section 122(h) (where
applicable), and the performance and cost information about eligible
providers of training services described in WIA sections 122(e) and
(h).
(c) An individual who has been determined eligible for training
services under Sec. 663.310 may select a provider described in
paragraph (b) of this section after consultation with a case manager.
Unless the program has exhausted funds for the program year, the
operator must refer the individual to the selected provider, and
establish an ITA for the individual to pay for training. For purposes
of this paragraph, a referral may be carried out by providing a voucher
or certificate to the individual to obtain the training.
(d) The cost of referral of an individual with an ITA to a training
provider is paid by the applicable adult or dislocated worker program
under title I of WIA.
Subpart E--Eligible Training Providers
Sec. 663.500 What is the purpose of this subpart?
The workforce investment system established under WIA emphasizes
informed customer choice, system performance, and continuous
improvement. The eligible provider process is part of the strategy for
achieving these goals. Local Boards, in partnership with the State,
identify training providers whose performance qualifies them to receive
WIA funds to train adults and dislocated workers. After receiving core
and intensive services and in consultation with case managers, eligible
participants who need training use the list of these eligible providers
to make an informed choice. The ability of providers to successfully
perform, the procedures State and Local Boards use to establish
eligibility, and the degree to which information, including performance
information, on those providers is made available to customers eligible
for training services, are key factors affecting the successful
implementation of the Statewide workforce investment system. This
subpart describes the process for determining eligible training
providers.
Sec. 663.505 What are Eligible Providers of Training Services?
(a) Eligible providers of training services are described in WIA
section 122. They are those entities eligible to receive WIA title I-B
funds to provide training services to eligible adult and dislocated
worker customers.
(b) In order to provide training services under WIA title I-B, a
provider must meet the requirements of this subpart and WIA section
122.
(1) These requirements apply to the use of WIA title I adult and
dislocated worker funds to provide training:
(i) To individuals using ITA's to access training through the
eligible provider list; and
(ii) To individuals for training provided through the exceptions to
ITA's described at Sec. 663.430(a)(2) and (a)(3).
(2) These requirements apply to all organizations providing
training to adult and dislocated workers, including:
(i) Postsecondary educational institutions providing a program
described in section 122(a)(2)(A)(ii);
(ii) Entities that carry out programs under the National
Apprenticeship Act (29 U.S.C. 50 et seq.);
(iii) Other public or private providers of a program of training
services described in WIA section 122(a)(2)(C);
(iv) Local Boards, if they meet the conditions of WIA section
117(f)(1), and
(v) Community-based organizations and other private organizations
providing training under Sec. 663.430.
(c) Provider eligibility procedures must be established by the
Governor, as required by this subpart. Different procedures are
described in WIA for determinations of ``initial'' and ``subsequent''
eligibility. Because the processes are different, they are discussed
separately.
Sec. 663.508 What is a ``program of training services''?
A program of training services is:
(a) One or more courses or classes that, upon successful
completion, leads to:
[[Page 18709]]
(1) A certificate, an associate degree, or baccalaureate degree, or
(2) A competency or skill recognized by employers, or
(b) A training regimen that provides individuals with additional
skills or competencies generally recognized by employers.
Sec. 663.510 Who is responsible for managing the eligible provider
process?
(a) The State and the Local Boards each have responsibilities for
managing the eligible provider process.
(b) The Governor must establish eligibility criteria for certain
providers to become initially eligible and must set minimum levels of
performance for all providers to remain subsequently eligible.
(c) The Governor must designate a State agency (called ``designated
State agency'') to assist in carrying out WIA section 122. The
designated State agency is responsible for:
(1) Developing and maintaining the State list of eligible
providers, which is comprised of lists submitted by Local Boards;
(2) Verifying the accuracy of the information on the State list, in
consultation with the Local Boards, removing providers who do not meet
program performance levels, and taking appropriate enforcement actions,
against providers in the case of the intentional provision of
inaccurate information, as described in WIA section 122(f)(1), and in
the case of a substantial violation of the requirements of WIA, as
described in WIA section 122(f)(2);
(3) Disseminating the State list, accompanied by performance and
cost information relating to each provider, to One-Stop operators
throughout the State.
(d) The Local Board must:
(1) Accept applications for initial eligibility from certain
postsecondary institutions and entities providing apprenticeship
training;
(2) Carry out procedures prescribed by the Governor to assist in
determining the initial eligibility of other providers;
(3) Carry out procedures prescribed by the Governor to assist in
determining the subsequent eligibility of all providers;
(4) Compile a local list of eligible providers, collect the
performance and cost information and any other required information
relating to providers;
(5) Submit the local list and information to the designated State
agency;
(6) Ensure the dissemination and appropriate use of the State list
through the local One-Stop system;
(7) Consult with the designated State agency in cases where
termination of an eligible provider is contemplated because inaccurate
information has been provided; and
(8) Work with the designated State agency in cases where the
termination of an eligible provider is contemplated because of
violations of the Act.
(e) The Local Board may:
(1) Make recommendations to the Governor on the procedures to be
used in determining initial eligibility of certain providers;
(2) Increase the levels of performance required by the State for
local providers to maintain subsequent eligibility;
(3) Require additional verifiable program-specific information from
local providers to maintain subsequent eligibility.
Sec. 663.515 What is the process for initial determination of provider
eligibility?
(a) For postsecondary educational institutions that are eligible to
receive assistance under title IV of the Higher Education Act, and that
provide a program that leads to an associate or baccalaureate degree or
certificate, and for entities carrying out apprenticeship programs
registered under the National Apprenticeship Act to be initially
eligible to receive adult or dislocated worker training funds under
title I of WIA, the institution or entity must submit an application to
the Local Board(s) for the local area(s) in which the provider desires
to provide training services that describes each program of training
services, as defined in Sec. 663.508, that leads to such a degree or
certificate or is registered under the National Apprenticeship Act.
(b) Local Boards determine the procedures to use in making an
application under paragraph (a) of this section. The Local Board
procedures must specify the timing, manner, and contents of the
required application.
(c) For other providers,
(1) The Governor must develop a procedure for use by Local Boards
for determining the eligibility of other providers, after
(i) Soliciting and taking into consideration recommendations from
Local Boards and providers of training services within the State; and
(ii) Providing an opportunity for interested members of the public,
including representatives of business and labor organizations, to
submit comments on the procedure.
(2) The procedure must be described in the State Plan.
(3)(i) The procedure must require that the provider must submit an
application to the Local Board at such time and in such manner as may
be required, which contains a description of the program of training
services;
(ii) If the provider provides a program of training services on the
date of application, the procedure must require that the application
include an appropriate portion of the performance information and
program cost information described in Sec. 663.540 of this subpart, and
that the program meet appropriate levels of performance;
(iii) If the provider does not provide a program of training
services on that date, the procedure must require that the provider
meet appropriate requirements specified in the procedure. (WIA section
122(b)(2)(D).)
(4) Programs of training services provided by postsecondary
educational institutions that do not lead to an associate or
baccalaureate degree or certificate and apprenticeship programs that
are not registered under the National Apprenticeship Act must be
determined initially eligible under the provisions of this paragraph
(c).
(d) The Local Board must include providers that meet the
requirements of paragraphs (a) and (c) of this section on a local list
and submit the list to the designated State agency. The State agency
has 30 days to verify the information relating to the providers under
paragraph (c) of this section. After the agency verifies that the
provider meets the criteria for initial eligibility, or 30 days have
elapsed, whichever occurs first, the provider is initially eligible as
a provider of training services. The providers submitted under
paragraph (a) of this section are initially eligible without State
agency review. (WIA section 122(e).)
Sec. 663.530 Is there a time limit on the period of initial
eligibility for training providers?
Yes. Under WIA section 122(c)(5), the Governor must require
training providers to submit performance information and meet
performance levels annually in order to remain eligible providers.
States may require that these performance requirements be met one year
from the date that initial eligibility was determined, or may require
all eligible providers to submit performance information by the same
date each year. If the latter approach is adopted, the Governor may
exempt eligible providers whose determination of initial eligibility
occurs within six months of the date of submissions. The effect of this
requirement is that no training provider may have a period of initial
eligibility that exceeds eighteen months.
[[Page 18710]]
Sec. 663.535 What is the process for determination of the subsequent
eligibility of a provider?
(a) The Governor must develop a procedure for the Local Board to
use in determining the subsequent eligibility of all eligible training
providers determined initially eligible under Sec. 663.515 (a) and (c),
after:
(1) Soliciting and taking into consideration recommendations from
Local Boards and providers of training services within the State, and
(2) Providing an opportunity for interested members of the public,
including representatives of business and labor organizations, to
submit comments on such procedure.
(b) The procedure must be described in the State Plan.
(c) The procedure must require that:
(1) Providers annually submit performance and cost information as
described at WIA sections 122(d)(1) and (2), for each program of
training services for which the provider has been determined to be
eligible, in a time and manner determined by the Local Board;
(2) Providers annually meet minimum performance levels described at
WIA section 122(c)(6).
(d) The provider's performance information must meet the minimum
acceptable levels established under paragraph (c)(2) of this section to
remain eligible;
(e) Local Boards may require higher levels of performance for local
providers than the levels specified in the procedures established by
the Governor. (WIA sections 122(c)(5) and (c)(6).)
(f) The State procedure must require Local Boards to take into
consideration:
(1) The specific economic, geographic and demographic factors in
the local areas in which providers seeking eligibility are located, and
(2) The characteristics of the populations served by providers
seeking eligibility, including the demonstrated difficulties in serving
these populations, where applicable.
(g) The Local Board retains those providers on the local list that
meet the required performance levels and other elements of the State
procedures and submits the list, accompanied by the performance and
cost information, and any additional required information, to the
designated State agency. If the designated State agency determines
within 30 days from the receipt of the information that the provider
does not meet the performance levels established under paragraph (c)(2)
of this section, the provider may be removed from the list. A provider
retained on the local list and not removed by the designated State
agency is considered an eligible provider of training services.
Sec. 663.540 What kind of performance and cost information is required
for determinations of subsequent eligibility?
(a) Eligible providers of training services must submit, at least
annually, under procedures established by the Governor under
Sec. 663.535(c):
(1) Verifiable program-specific performance information, including:
(i) The information described in WIA section 122(d)(1)(A)(i) for
all individuals participating in the programs of training services,
including individuals who are not receiving assistance under WIA
section 134 and individuals who are receiving such assistance; and
(ii) The information described in WIA section 122(d)(1)(A)(ii)
relating only to individuals receiving assistance under the WIA adult
and dislocated worker program who are participating in the applicable
program of training services; and
(2) Information on program costs (such as tuition and fees) for WIA
participants in the program.
(b) Governors may require any additional verifiable performance
information (such as the information described at WIA section
122(d)(2)) that the Governor determines to be appropriate to obtain
subsequent eligibility, including information regarding all
participating individuals as well as individuals receiving assistance
under the WIA adult and dislocated worker program.
(c) If the additional information required under paragraph (b) of
this section imposes extraordinary costs on providers, or if providers
experience extraordinary costs in the collection of information,
(1) The Governor or Local Board must provide access to cost-
effective methods for the collection of the information; or
(2) The Governor must provide additional resources to assist
providers in the collection of the information from funds for Statewide
workforce investment activities reserved under WIA sections 128(a) and
133(a)(1).
(d) The Local Board and the designated State agency may accept
program-specific performance information consistent with the
requirements for eligibility under title IV of the Higher Education Act
of 1965 from a provider for purposes of enabling the provider to
fulfill the applicable requirements of this section, if the information
is substantially similar to the information otherwise required under
this section.
Sec. 663.550 How is eligible provider information developed and
maintained?
(a) The designated State agency must maintain a list of all
eligible training providers in the State (the ``State list'').
(b) The State list is a compilation of the eligible providers
identified or retained by local areas and that have not been removed
under Sec. 663.535(c) and 663.565.
(c) The State list must be accompanied by the performance and cost
information contained in the local lists as required by
Sec. 663.535(e). (WIA section 122(e)(4)(A).)
Sec. 663.555 How is the State list disseminated?
(a) The designated State agency must disseminate the State list and
accompanying performance and cost information to the One-Stop delivery
systems within the State.
(b) The State list and information must be updated at least
annually.
(c) The State list and accompanying information form the primary
basis of the One-Stop consumer reports system that provides for
informed customer choice. The list and information must be widely
available, through the One-Stop delivery system, to customers seeking
information on training outcomes, as well as participants in employment
and training activities funded under WIA and other programs.
(1) The State list must be made available to individuals who have
been determined eligible for training services under Sec. 663.310.
(2) The State list must also be made available to customers whose
training is supported by other One-Stop partners.
Sec. 663.565 May an eligible training provider lose its eligibility?
(a) Yes. A training provider must deliver results and provide
accurate information in order to retain its status as an eligible
training provider.
(b) If the provider does not meet the established performance
levels, it will be removed from the eligible provider list.
(1) A Local Board must determine, during the subsequent eligibility
determination process, whether a provider meets performance levels. If
the provider fails to meet such levels, the provider must be removed
from the local list.
(2) The designated State agency upon receipt of the performance
information accompanying the local list, may remove a provider from the
State list if the agency determines the provider failed to meet the
levels of performance prescribed under Sec. 663.535(c).
(3) Providers determined to have intentionally supplied inaccurate
[[Page 18711]]
information or to have subsequently violated any provision of title I
of WIA or these regulations may be removed from the list in accordance
with the enforcement provisions of WIA section 122(f). A provider whose
eligibility is terminated under these conditions is liable to repay all
adult and dislocated worker training funds it received during the
period of noncompliance.
(4) The Governor must establish appeal procedures for providers of
training to appeal a denial of eligibility under this part according to
the requirements of 20 CFR 667.640(b).
Sec. 663.570 What is the consumer reports system?
The consumer reports system, referred to in WIA as performance
information, is the vehicle for informing the customers of the One-Stop
delivery system about the performance of training providers in the
local area. It is built upon the State list of eligible providers
developed through the procedures described in WIA section 122 and this
subpart. The consumer reports system must contain the information
necessary for an adult or dislocated worker customer to fully
understand the options available to him or her in choosing a program of
training services. Such program-specific factors may include overall
performance, performance for significant customer groups (including
wage replacement rates for dislocated workers), performance of specific
provider sites, current information on employment and wage trends and
projections, and duration of training programs.
Sec. 663.575 In what ways can a Local Board supplement the information
available from the State list?
(a) Local Boards may supplement the information available from the
State list by providing customers with additional information to assist
in supporting informed customer choice and the achievement of local
performance measures (as described in WIA section 136).
(b) This additional information may include:
(1) Information on programs of training services that are linked to
occupations in demand in the local area;
(2) Performance and cost information, including program-specific
performance and cost information, for the local outlet(s) of multi-site
eligible providers; and
(3) Other appropriate information related to the objectives of WIA,
which may include the information described in Sec. 663.570.
Sec. 663.585 May individuals choose training providers located outside
of the local area?
Yes. Individuals may choose any of the eligible providers on the
State list. A State may also establish a reciprocal agreement with
another State(s) to permit eligible providers of training services in
each State to accept individual training accounts provided in the other
State. (WIA sections 122(e)(4) and (e)(5).)
Sec. 663.590 May a community-based organization (CBO) be included on
an eligible provider list?
Yes. CBO's may apply and be determined eligible providers of
training services, under WIA section 122 and this subpart. As eligible
providers, CBO's provide training through ITA's and may also receive
contracts for training special participant populations when the
requirements of Sec. 663.430 are met.
Sec. 663.595 What requirements apply to providers of OJT and
customized training?
For OJT and customized training providers, One-Stop operators in a
local area must collect such performance information as the Governor
may require, determine whether the providers meet such performance
criteria as the Governor may require, and disseminate a list of
providers that have met such criteria, along with the relevant
performance information about them, through the One-Stop delivery
system. Providers determined to meet the criteria are considered to be
identified as eligible providers of training services. These providers
are not subject to the other requirements of WIA section 122 or this
subpart.
Subpart F--Priority and Special Populations
Sec. 663.600 What priority must be given to low-income adults and
public assistance recipients served with adult funds under title I?
(a) WIA states, in section 134(d)(4)(E), that in the event that
funds allocated to a local area for adult employment and training
activities are limited, priority for intensive and training services
funded with title I adult funds must be given to recipients of public
assistance and other low-income individuals in the local area.
(b) Since funding is generally limited, States and local areas must
establish criteria by which local areas can determine the availability
of funds and the process by which any priority will be applied under
WIA section 134(d)(2)(E). Such criteria may include the availability of
other funds for providing employment and training-related services in
the local area, the needs of the specific groups within the local area,
and other appropriate factors.
(c) States and local areas must give priority for adult intensive
and training services to recipients of public assistance and other low-
income individuals, unless the local area has determined that funds are
not limited under the criteria established under paragraph (b) of this
section.
(d) The process for determining whether to apply the priority
established under paragraph (b) of this section does not necessarily
mean that only the recipients of public assistance and other low income
individuals may receive WIA adult funded intensive and training
services when funds are determined to be limited in a local area. The
Local Board and the Governor may establish a process that gives
priority for services to the recipients of public assistance and other
low income individuals and that also serves other individuals meeting
eligibility requirements.
Sec. 663.610 Does the statutory priority for use of adult funds also
apply to dislocated worker funds?
No. The statutory priority applies to adult funds for intensive and
training services only. Funds allocated for dislocated workers are not
subject to this requirement.
Sec. 663.620 How do the Welfare-to-Work program and the TANF program
relate to the One-Stop delivery system?
(a) The local Welfare-to-Work (WtW) program operator is a required
partner in the One-Stop delivery system. 20 CFR part 662 describes the
roles of such partners in the One-Stop delivery system and applies to
the Welfare-to-Work program operator. WtW programs serve individuals
who may also be served by the WIA programs and, through appropriate
linkages and referrals, these customers will have access to a broader
range of services through the cooperation of the WtW program in the
One-Stop system. WtW participants, who are determined to be WIA
eligible, and who need occupational skills training may be referred
through the One-Stop system to receive WIA training. WIA participants
who are also determined WtW eligible, may be referred to the WtW
operator for job placement and other WtW assistance.
(b) The local TANF agency is specifically suggested under WIA as an
additional partner in the One-Stop system. TANF recipients will have
access to more information about employment opportunities and services
[[Page 18712]]
when the TANF agency participates in the One-Stop delivery system. The
Governor and Local Board should encourage the TANF agency to become a
One-Stop partner to improve the quality of services to the WtW and
TANF-eligible populations. In addition, becoming a One-Stop partner
will ensure that the TANF agency is represented on the Local Board and
participates in developing workforce investment strategies that help
cash assistance recipients secure lasting employment.
Sec. 663.630 How does a displaced homemaker qualify for services under
title I?
Displaced homemakers may be eligible to receive assistance under
title I in a variety of ways, including:
(a) Core services provided by the One-Stop partners through the
One-Stop delivery system;
(b) Intensive or training services for which an individual
qualifies as a dislocated worker/displaced homemaker if the
requirements of this part are met;
(c) Intensive or training services for which an individual is
eligible if the requirements of this part are met;
(d) Statewide employment and training projects conducted with
reserve funds for innovative programs for displaced homemakers, as
described in 20 CFR 665.210(f) .
Sec. 663.640 May a disabled individual whose family does not meet
income eligibility criteria under the Act be eligible for priority as a
low income adult?
Yes. Even if the family of a disabled individual does not meet the
income eligibility criteria, the disabled individual is to be
considered a low-income individual if the individual's own income:
(a) Meets the income criteria established in WIA section
101(25)(B); or
(b) Meets the income eligibility criteria for cash payments under
any Federal, State or local public assistance program. (WIA section
101(25)(F).)
Subpart G--On-the-Job Training (OJT) and Customized Training
Sec. 663.700 What are the requirements for on-the-job training (OJT)?
(a) On-the-job training (OJT) is defined at WIA section 101(31).
OJT is provided by an employer in the public, private non-profit, or
private sector. A contract may be developed between the employer and
the local program that provides occupational training for the WIA
participant in exchange for the reimbursement of up to 50 percent of
the wage rate to compensate for the employer's extraordinary costs.
(WIA section 101(31)(B).)
(b) The local program must not contract with an employer who has
previously exhibited a pattern of failing to provide OJT participants
with continued long-term employment with wages, benefits, and working
conditions that are equal to those provided to regular employees who
have worked a similar length of time and are doing the same type of
work. (WIA section 195(4).)
(c) An OJT contract must be limited to the period of time required
for a participant to become proficient in the occupation for which the
training is being provided. In determining the appropriate length of
the contract, consideration should be given to the skill requirements
of the occupation, the academic and occupational skill level of the
participant, prior work experience, and the participant's individual
employment plan. (WIA section 101(31)(C).)
Sec. 663.705 What are the requirements for OJT contracts for employed
workers?
OJT contracts may be written for eligible employed workers when:
(a) The employee is not earning a self-sufficient wage as
determined by Local Board policy;
(b) The requirements in Sec. 663.700 are met; and
(c) The OJT relates to the introduction of new technologies,
introduction to new production or service procedures, upgrading to new
jobs that require additional skills, workplace literacy, or other
appropriate purposes identified by the Local Board.
Sec. 663.710 What conditions govern OJT payments to employers?
(a) On-the-job training payments to employers are deemed to be
compensation for the extraordinary costs associated with training
participants and the costs associated with the lower productivity of
the participants.
(b) Employers may be reimbursed up to 50 percent of the wage rate
of an OJT participant for the extraordinary costs of providing the
training and additional supervision related to the OJT. (WIA section
101(31)(B).)
(c) Employers are not required to document such extraordinary
costs.
Sec. 663.715 What is customized training?
Customized training is training:
(a) that is designed to meet the special requirements of an
employer (including a group of employers);
(b) that is conducted with a commitment by the employer to employ,
or in the case of incumbent workers, continue to employ, an individual
on successful completion of the training; and
(c) for which the employer pays for not less than 50 percent of the
cost of the training. (WIA section 101(8).)
Sec. 663.720 What are the requirements for customized training for
employed workers?
Customized training of an eligible employed individual may be
provided for an employer or a group of employers when:
(a) The employee is not earning a self-sufficient wage as
determined by Local Board policy;
(b) The requirements in Sec. 663.715 are met; and
(c) The customized training relates to the purposes described in
Sec. 663.705(c) or other appropriate purposes identified by the Local
Board.
Subpart H--Supportive Services
Sec. 663.800 What are supportive services for adults and dislocated
workers?
Supportive services for adults and dislocated workers are defined
at WIA sections 101(46) and 134(e)(2) and (3). They include services
such as transportation, child care, dependent care, housing, and needs-
related payments, that are necessary to enable an individual to
participate in activities authorized under WIA title I. Local Boards,
in consultation with the One-Stop partners and other community service
providers, must develop a policy on supportive services that ensures
resource and service coordination in the local area, such policy should
address procedures for referral to such services, including how such
services will be funded when they are not otherwise available from
other sources. The provision of accurate information about the
availability of supportive services in the local area, as well as
referral to such activities, is one of the core services that must be
available to adults and dislocated workers through the One-Stop
delivery system. (WIA section 134(d)(2)(H).)
Sec. 663.805 When may supportive services be provided to participants?
(a) Supportive services may only be provided to individuals who
are:
(1) Participating in core, intensive or training services; and
(2) Unable to obtain supportive services through other programs
providing such services. (WIA section 134(e)(2)(A) and (B).)
(b) Supportive services may only be provided when they are
necessary to enable individuals to participate in title I activities.
(WIA section 101(46).)
[[Page 18713]]
Sec. 663.810 Are there limits on the amounts or duration of funds for
supportive services?
(a) Local Boards may establish limits on the provision of
supportive services or provide the One-Stop operator with the authority
to establish such limits, including a maximum amount of funding and
maximum length of time for supportive services to be available to
participants.
(b) Procedures may also be established to allow One-Stop operators
to grant exceptions to the limits established under paragraph (a) of
this section.
Sec. 663.815 What are needs-related payments?
Needs-related payments provide financial assistance to participants
for the purpose of enabling individuals to participate in training and
are one of the supportive services authorized by WIA section 134(e)(3).
Sec. 663.820 What are the eligibility requirements for adults to
receive needs-related payments?
Adults must:
(a) Be unemployed,
(b) Not qualify for, or have ceased qualifying for, unemployment
compensation; and
(c) Be enrolled in a program of training services under WIA section
134(d)(4).
Sec. 663.825 What are the eligibility requirements for dislocated
workers to receive needs-related payments?
To receive needs related payments, a dislocated worker must:
(a) Be unemployed, and:
(1) Have ceased to qualify for unemployment compensation or trade
readjustment assistance under TAA or NAFTA-TAA; and
(2) Be enrolled in a program of training services under WIA section
134(d)(4) by the end of the 13th week after the most recent layoff that
resulted in a determination of the worker's eligibility as a dislocated
worker, or, if later, by the end of the 8th week after the worker is
informed that a short-term layoff will exceed 6 months; or
(b) Be unemployed and did not qualify for unemployment compensation
or trade readjustment assistance under TAA or NAFTA-TAA.
Sec. 663.830 May needs-related payments be paid while a participant is
waiting to start training classes?
Yes. Payments may be provided if the participant has been accepted
in a training program that will begin within 30 calender days. The
Governor may authorize local areas to extend the 30 day period to
address appropriate circumstances.
Sec. 663.840 How is the level of needs-related payments determined?
(a) The payment level for adults must be established by the Local
Board.
(b) For dislocated workers, payments must not exceed the greater of
either of the following levels:
(1) For participants who were eligible for unemployment
compensation as a result of the qualifying dislocation, the payment may
not exceed the applicable weekly level of the unemployment compensation
benefit; or
(2) For participants who did not qualify for unemployment
compensation as a result of the qualifying layoff, the weekly payment
may not exceed the poverty level for an equivalent period. The weekly
payment level must be adjusted to reflect changes in total family
income as determined by Local Board policies. (WIA section
134(e)(3)(C).)
PART 664--YOUTH ACTIVITIES UNDER TITLE I OF THE WORKFORCE
INVESTMENT ACT
Subpart A--Youth Councils
Sec.
664.100 What is the youth council?
664.110 Who is responsible for oversight of youth programs in the
local area?
Subpart B--Eligibility for Youth Services
664.200 Who is eligible for youth services?
664.205 How is the ``deficient in basic literacy skills'' criterion
in Sec. 664.200(c)(1) defined and documented?
664.210 How is the ``. . . requires additional assistance to
complete an educational program, or to secure and hold employment''
criterion in Sec. 664.200(c)(6) defined and documented?
664.215 Must youth participants be registered to participate in the
program?
664.220 Is there an exception to permit youth who are not low-
income individuals to receive youth services?
664.230 Are the eligibility barriers for eligible youth the same as
the eligibility barriers for the five percent of youth participants
who do not have to meet income eligibility requirements?
664.240 May a local program use eligibility for free lunches under
the National School Lunch Program as a substitute for the income
eligibility criteria under the title I of WIA?
664.250 May a disabled youth whose family does not meet income
eligibility criteria under the Act be eligible for youth services?
Subpart C--Out-of-School Youth
664.300 Who is an ``out-of-school youth''?
664.310 Is a youth attending an alternative school a ``dropout''?
664.320 Does the requirement that at least 30 percent of youth
funds be used to provide activities to out-of-school youth apply to
all youth funds?
Subpart D--Youth Program Design, Elements, and Parameters
664.400 How must local youth programs be designed?
664.410 Must local programs include each of the ten program
elements listed in WIA section 129(c)(2) as options available to
youth participants?
664.420 What are leadership development opportunities?
664.430 What are positive social behaviors?
664.440 What are supportive services for youth?
664.450 What are followup services for youth?
664.460 What are work experiences for youth?
664.470 Are paid work experiences allowable activities?
Subpart E--Concurrent Enrollment
664.500 May youth participate in both youth and adult programs
concurrently?
664.510 Are Individual Training Accounts allowed for youth
participants?
Subpart F--Summer Employment Opportunities
664.600 Are Local Boards required to offer summer employment
opportunities in the local youth program?
664.610 How is the summer employment opportunities element
administered?
664.620 Do the core indicators described in 20 CFR 666.100(a)(3)
apply to participation in summer employment activities?
Subpart G--One-Stop Services to Youth
664.700 What is the connection between the youth program and the
One-Stop service delivery system?
664.710 Do Local Boards have the flexibility to offer services to
area youth who are not eligible under the youth program through the
One-Stop centers?
Subpart H--Youth Opportunity Grants
664.800 How are the recipients of Youth Opportunity Grants
selected?
664.810 How does a Local Board or other entity become eligible to
receive a Youth Opportunity Grant?
664.820 Who is eligible to receive services under Youth Opportunity
Grants?
664.830 How are performance measures for Youth Opportunity Grants
determined?
Authority: Sec. 506(c), Pub. L. 105-220; 20 U.S.C. 9276(c)
Subpart A--Youth Councils
Sec. 664.100 What is the youth council?
(a) The duties and membership requirements of the youth council are
described in WIA section 117(h) and 20 CFR 661.335 and 661.340.
(b) The purpose of the youth council is to provide expertise in
youth policy and to assist the Local Board in:
[[Page 18714]]
(1) Developing and recommending local youth employment and training
policy and practice;
(2) Broadening the youth employment and training focus in the
community to incorporate a youth development perspective;
(3) Establishing linkages with other organizations serving youth in
the local area; and
(4) Taking into account a range issues that can have an impact on
the success of youth in the labor market. (WIA sec. 117(h).)
Sec. 664.110 Who is responsible for oversight of youth programs in the
local area?
(a) The Local Board, working with the youth council, is responsible
for conducting oversight of local youth programs operated under the
Act, to ensure both fiscal and programmatic accountability.
(b) Local program oversight is conducted in consultation with the
local area's chief elected official.
(c) The Local Board may delegate its responsibility for oversight
of eligible youth providers, as well as other oversight
responsibilities, to the youth council, recognizing the advantage of
delegating such responsibilities to the youth council whose members
have expertise in youth issues. (WIA sec. 117(h)(4).)
Subpart B--Eligibility for Youth Services
Sec. 664.200 Who is eligible for youth services?
An eligible youth is defined, under WIA section 101(13), as an
individual who:
(a) Is age 14 through 21;
(b) Is a low income individual, as defined in the WIA section
101(25); and
(c) Is within one or more of the following categories:
(1) Deficient in basic literacy skills;
(2) School dropout;
(3) Homeless, runaway, or foster child;
(4) Pregnant or parenting;
(5) Offender; or
(6) Is an individual (including a youth with a disability) who
requires additional assistance to complete an educational program, or
to secure and hold employment. (WIA sec. 101(13).)
Sec. 664.205 How is the ``deficient in basic literacy skills''
criterion in Sec. 664.200(c)(1) defined and documented?
(a) Definitions and eligibility documentation requirements
regarding the ``deficient in basic literacy skills'' criterion in
Sec. 664.200(c)(1) may be established at the State or local level.
These definitions may establish such criteria as are needed to address
State or local concerns, but must include a determination that an
individual:
(1) Computes or solves problems, reads, writes, or speaks English
at or below grade level 8.9; or
(2) Is unable to compute or solve problems, read, write, or speak
English at a level necessary to function on the job, in the
individual's family or in society.
(b) In cases where the State Board establishes State policy on this
criterion, the policy must be included in the State plan. (WIA secs.
101(13)(C)(i), 101(19).)
Sec. 664.210 How is the `` . . . requires additional assistance to
complete an educational program, or to secure and hold employment''
criterion in Sec. 664.200(c)(6) defined and documented?
Definitions and eligibility documentation requirements regarding
the ``requires additional assistance to complete an educational
program, or to secure and hold employment'' criterion of
Sec. 664.200(c)(6) may be established at the State or local level. In
cases where the State Board establishes State policy on this criterion,
the policy must be included in the State Plan. (WIA sec.
101(13)(C)(iv).)
Sec. 664.215 Must youth participants be registered to participate in
the youth program?
(a) Yes. All youth participants must be registered.
(b) Registration is the process of collecting information to
support a determination of eligibility.
(c) EEO data must be collected on individuals during the
registration process.
Sec. 664.220 Is there an exception to permit youth who are not low-
income individuals to receive youth services?
Yes. Up to five percent of youth participants served by youth
programs in a local area may be individuals who do not meet the income
criterion for eligible youth, provided that they are within one or more
of the following categories:
(a) School dropout;
(b) Basic skills deficient, as defined in WIA section 101(4);
(c) Are one or more grade levels below the grade level appropriate
to the individual's age;
(d) Pregnant or parenting;
(e) Possess one or more disabilities, including learning
disabilities;
(f) Homeless or runaway;
(g) Offender; or
(h) Face serious barriers to employment as identified by the Local
Board. (WIA sec. 129(c)(5).)
Sec. 664.230 Are the eligibility barriers for eligible youth the same
as the eligibility barriers for the five percent of youth participants
who do not have to meet income eligibility requirements?
No. The barriers listed in Sec. 664.200 and Sec. 664.220 are not
the same. Both lists of eligibility barriers include school dropout,
homeless or runaway, pregnant or parenting, and offender, but each list
contains barriers not included on the other list.
Sec. 664.240 May a local program use eligibility for free lunches
under the National School Lunch Program as a substitute for the income
eligibility criteria under the title I of WIA?
No. The criteria for income eligibility under the National School
Lunch Program are not the same as the Act's income eligibility
criteria. Therefore, the school lunch list may not be used as a
substitute for income eligibility to determine who is eligible for
services under the Act.
Sec. 664.250 May a disabled youth whose family does not meet income
eligibility criteria under the Act be eligible for youth services?
Yes. Even if the family of a disabled youth does not meet the
income eligibility criteria, the disabled youth is to be considered a
low-income individual if the youth's own income:
(a) Meets the income criteria established in WIA section
101(25)(B); or
(b) Meets the income eligibility criteria for cash payments under
any Federal, State or local public assistance program. (WIA sec.
101(25)(F).)
Subpart C--Out-of-School Youth
Sec. 664.300 Who is ``out-of-school youth''?
An out-of-school youth is an individual who:
(a) Is an eligible youth who is a school dropout; or
(b) Is an eligible youth who has either graduated from high school
or holds a GED, but is basic skills deficient, unemployed, or
underemployed. (WIA sec. 101(33).)
Sec. 664.310 Is youth attending an alternative school a ``dropout'?
No. A school dropout is defined as an individual who is no longer
attending any school and who has not received a secondary school
diploma or its recognized equivalent. A youth attending an alternative
school is not a dropout. (WIA sec. 101(39).)
[[Page 18715]]
Sec. 664.320 Does the requirement that at least 30 percent of youth
funds be used to provide activities to out-of-school youth apply to all
youth funds?
(a) Yes. The 30 percent requirement applies to the total amount of
all funds allocated to a local area under section 128(b)(2)(A) or
(b)(3) of WIA.
(b) Although it is not necessary to ensure that 30 percent of such
funds spent on summer employment opportunities (or any other particular
element of the youth program) are spent on out-of-school youth, the
funds spent on these activities are included in the total to which the
30 percent requirement applies.
(c) There is a limited exception, at WIA section 129(c)(4)(B),
under which certain small States may apply to the Secretary to reduce
the minimum amount that must be spent on out-of-school youth. (WIA sec.
129(c)(4).)
Subpart D--Youth Program Design, Elements, and Parameters
Sec. 664.400 How must local youth programs be designed?
(a) The design framework of local youth programs must:
(1) Provide an objective assessment of each youth participant, that
meets the requirements of WIA section 129(c)(1)(A), and includes a
review of the academic and occupational skill levels, as well as the
service needs, of each youth;
(2) Develop an individual service strategy for each youth
participant that meets the requirements of WIA section 129(c)(1)(B),
including identifying a career goal and consideration of the assessment
results for each youth; and
(3) Provide preparation for postsecondary educational
opportunities, provide linkages between academic and occupational
learning, provide preparation for employment, and provide effective
connections to intermediary organizations that provide strong links to
the job market and employers.
(b) The local plan must describe the design framework for youth
program design in the local area, and of how the ten program elements
required in Sec. 664.410 of this part are provided within that
framework.
(c) Local Boards must ensure appropriate links to entities that
will foster the participation of eligible local area youth. Such links
may include connections to:
(1) Local area justice and law enforcement officials;
(2) Local public housing authorities;
(3) Local education agencies;
(4) Job Corps representatives; and
(5) Representatives of other area youth initiatives, including
those that serve homeless youth and other public and private youth
initiatives.
(d) Local Boards must ensure that the referral requirements in WIA
section 129(c)(3) for youth who meet the income eligibility criteria
are met, including:
(1) Providing these youth with information regarding the full array
of applicable or appropriate services available through the Local
Board, providers found eligible by the board, or One-Stop partners; and
(2) Referring these youth to appropriate training and educational
programs that have the capacity to serve them either on a sequential or
concurrent basis.
(e) In order to meet the basic skills and training needs of
eligible applicants who do not meet the enrollment requirements of a
particular program or who cannot be served by the program, each
eligible youth provider must ensure that these youth are referred:
(1) For further assessment, as necessary, and
(2) To appropriate programs, in accordance with paragraph (d)(2) of
this section.
(f) Local Boards must ensure that parents, youth participants, and
other members of the community with experience relating to youth
programs are involved in both the design and implementation of its
youth programs.
(g) The objective assessment required under paragraph (a)(1) of
this section or the individual service strategy required under
paragraph (a)(2) of this section is not required if the program
provider determines that it is appropriate to use a recent objective
assessment or individual service strategy that was developed under
another education or training program. (WIA section 129(c)(1).)
Sec. 664.410 Must local programs include each of the ten program
elements listed in WIA section 129(c)(2) as options available to youth
participants?
(a) Yes. Local programs must make the following services available
to youth participants:
(1) Tutoring, study skills training, and instruction leading to
secondary school completion, including dropout prevention strategies;
(2) Alternative secondary school offerings;
(3) Summer employment opportunities directly linked to academic and
occupational learning;
(4) Paid and unpaid work experiences, including internships and job
shadowing, as provided in Secs. 664.460 and 664.470 of this part;
(5) Occupational skill training;
(6) Leadership development opportunities, which may include such
activities as positive social behavior and soft skills, decision
making, team work, and other activities, as provided in Secs. 664.420
and 664.430 of this part;
(7) Supportive services, which may include the services listed in
Sec. 664.440;
(8) Adult mentoring for a duration of at least twelve (12) months,
that may occur both during and after program participation;
(9) Followup services, as provided in Sec. 664.450; and
(10) Comprehensive guidance and counseling, including drug and
alcohol abuse counseling, as well as referrals to counseling, as
appropriate to the needs of the individual youth.
(b) Local programs have the discretion to determine what specific
program services will be provided to a youth participant, based on each
participant's objective assessment and individual service strategy.
(WIA sec. 129(c)(2).)
Sec. 664.420 What are leadership development opportunities?
Leadership development opportunities for youth may include the
following:
(a) Exposure to postsecondary educational opportunities;
(b) Community and service learning projects;
(c) Peer-centered activities, including peer mentoring and
tutoring;
(d) Organizational and team work training, including team
leadership training;
(e) Training in decision-making, including determining priorities;
(f) Citizenship training, including life skills training such as
parenting, work behavior training, and budgeting of resources;
(g) Employability; and
(h) Positive social behaviors. (WIA sec. 129(c)(2)(F).)
Sec. 664.430 What are positive social behaviors?
Positive social behaviors, often referred to as soft skills, are
incorporated by many local programs as part of their menu of services
which focus on areas that may include, but are not limited to, the
following:
(a) Positive attitudinal development;
(b) Self esteem building;
(c) Cultural diversity training; and
(d) Work simulation activities. (WIA sec. 129(c)(2)(F).)
Sec. 664.440 What are supportive services for youth?
Supportive services for youth, as defined in WIA section 101(46),
may include the following:
[[Page 18716]]
(a) Linkages to community services;
(b) Assistance with transportation costs;
(c) Assistance with child care and dependent care costs;
(d) Assistance with housing costs;
(e) Referrals to medical services; and
(f) Assistance with uniforms or other appropriate work attire and
work-related tool costs, including such items as eye glasses and
protective eye gear. (WIA sec. 129(c)(2)(G).)
Sec. 664.450 What are followup services for youth?
(a) Followup services for youth may include:
(1) The leadership development and supportive service activities
listed in Secs. 664.420 and 664.440 of this part;
(2) Regular contact with a youth participant's employer, including
assistance in addressing work-related problems that arise;
(3) Assistance in securing better paying jobs, career development
and further education;
(4) Work-related peer support groups;
(5) Adult mentoring; and
(6) Tracking the progress of youth in employment after training.
(b) All youth participants must receive some form of followup
services for a minimum duration of 12 months. Followup services may be
provided beyond twelve (12) months at the State or Local Board's
discretion. The types of services provided and the duration of services
must be determined based on the needs of the individual. The scope of
these followup services may be less intensive for youth who have only
participated in summer youth employment opportunities. (WIA sec.
129(c)(2)(I).)
Sec. 664.460 What are work experiences for youth?
(a) Work experiences are planned, structured learning experiences
that take place in a workplace for a limited period of time. As stated
in Sec. 664.470, work experiences may be paid or unpaid.
(b) Work experience workplaces may be in the private, for-profit
sector; the non-profit sector; or the public sector.
(c) Work experiences are designed to enable youth to gain exposure
to the working world and its requirements. Work experiences should help
youth acquire the personal attributes, knowledge, and skills needed to
obtain a job and advance in employment. The purpose is to provide the
youth participant with the opportunities for career exploration and
skill development and is not to benefit the employer, although the
employer may, in fact, benefit from the activities performed by the
youth. Work experiences may be subsidized or unsubsidized and may
include the following elements:
(1) Instruction in employability skills or generic workplace skills
such as those identified by the Secretary's Commission on Achieving
Necessary Skills (SCANS);
(2) Exposure to various aspects of an industry;
(3) Progressively more complex tasks;
(4) Internships and job shadowing;
(5) The integration of basic academic skills into work activities;
(6) Supported work, work adjustment, and other transition
activities;
(7) Entrepreneurship; and
(8) Other elements designed to achieve the goals of work
experience.
(d) In most cases, on-the-job training is not an appropriate work
experiences activity for youth participants under age 18. Local program
operators may choose, however, to use this service strategy for
eligible youth when it is appropriate based on the needs identified by
the objective assessment of an individual youth participant. (WIA sec.
129(c)(2)(D).)
Sec. 664.470 Are paid work experiences allowable activities?
Funds under the Act may be used to pay wages and related benefits
for work experiences in the public; private; for-profit; or non-profit
sectors where the objective assessment and individual service strategy
indicate that work experiences are appropriate. (WIA sec.
129(c)(2)(D).)
Subpart E--Concurrent Enrollment
Sec. 664.500 May youth participate in both youth and adult programs
concurrently?
(a) Under the Act, eligible youth are 14 through 21 years of age.
Adults are defined in the Act as individuals age 18 and older. Thus,
individuals ages 18 through 21 may be eligible for both adult and youth
programs.
(b) Eligible individuals who are 18 through 21 years old may
participate in adult and youth programs concurrently. Such individuals
must be eligible under the youth or adult eligibility criteria
applicable to the services received. Local program operators may
determine, for individuals in this age group, the appropriate level and
balance of youth and/or adult services.
(c) Local program operators must identify and track the funding
streams which pay the costs of services provided to individuals who are
participating in youth and adult programs concurrently, and ensure that
services are not duplicated.
Sec. 664.510 Are Individual Training Accounts allowed for youth
participants?
No. However, individuals age 18 and above, who are eligible for
training services under the adult and dislocated worker program, may
receive Individual Training Accounts through that program. Requirements
for concurrent participation requirements are set forth in Sec. 664.500
of this part. To the extent possible, in order to enhance youth
participant choice, youth participants should be involved in the
selection of educational and training activities.
Subpart F--Summer Employment Opportunities
Sec. 664.600 Are Local Boards required to offer summer employment
opportunities in the local youth program?
(a) Yes. Local Boards are required to offer summer youth employment
opportunities that link academic and occupational learning as part of
the menu of services required in Sec. 664.410(a).
(b) Summer youth employment must provide direct linkages to
academic and occupational learning, and may provide other elements and
strategies as appropriate to serve the needs and goals of the
participants.
(c) Local Boards may determine how much of available youth funds
will be used for summer and for year-round youth activities.
(d) The summer youth employment opportunities element is not
intended to be a stand-alone program. Local programs should integrate a
youth's participation in that element into a comprehensive strategy for
addressing the youth's employment and training needs. Youths who
participate in summer employment opportunities must be provided with a
minimum of twelve months of followup services, as required in
Sec. 664.450. (WIA sec. 129(c)(2)(C).)
Sec. 664.610 How is the summer employment opportunities element
administered?
Chief elected officials and Local Boards are responsible for
ensuring that the local youth program provides summer employment
opportunities to youth. The chief elected officials are the grant
recipients for local youth funds, unless another entity is chosen to be
grant recipient or fiscal agent under WIA section 117(d)(3)(B). If, in
the administration of the summer employment opportunities element of
the local youth program, providers other than the grant recipient/
fiscal agent are used to provide summer youth employment opportunities,
these providers must be selected by awarding a grant or contract on a
competitive
[[Page 18717]]
basis, based on the recommendation of the youth council and on criteria
contained in the State Plan. (WIA sec. 129(c)(2)(C).)
Sec. 664.620 Do the core indicators described in 20 CFR 666.100(a)(3)
apply to participation in summer employment activities?
Yes. The summer employment opportunities element is one of a number
of activities authorized by the WIA youth program. The law provides
specific core indicators of performance for youth, and requires that
all participating youth be included in the determination of whether the
local levels of performance are met. Program operators can help ensure
positive outcomes for youth participants by providing them with
continuity of services.
Subpart G--One-Stop Services to Youth
Sec. 664.700 What is the connection between the youth program and the
One-Stop service delivery system?
(a) The chief elected official (or designee under WIA section
117(d)(3)(B)), as the local grant recipient for the youth program is a
required One-Stop partner and is subject to the requirements that apply
to such partners, described in 20 CFR part 662.
(b) In addition to the provisions of 20 CFR part 662, connections
between the youth program and the One-Stop system may include those
that facilitate:
(1) The coordination and provision of youth activities;
(2) Linkages to the job market and employers;
(3) Access for eligible youth to the information and services
required in Secs. 664.400 and 664.410 of this part; and
(4) Other activities designed to achieve the purposes of the youth
program and youth activities as described in WIA section 129(a). (WIA
secs. 121(b)(1)(B)(i); 129.)
Sec. 664.710 Do Local Boards have the flexibility to offer services to
area youth who are not eligible under the youth program through the
One-Stop centers?
Yes. However, One-Stop services for non-eligible youth must be
funded by programs that are authorized to provide services to such
youth. For example, basic labor exchange services under the Wagner-
Peyser Act may be provided to any youth.
Subpart H--Youth Opportunity Grants
Sec. 664.800 How are the recipients of Youth Opportunity Grants
selected?
(a) Youth Opportunity Grants are awarded through a competitive
selection process. The Secretary establishes appropriate application
procedures, selection criteria, and an approval process for awarding
Youth Opportunity Grants to accomplish the purpose of the Act and use
available funds in an effective manner in the Solicitation for Grant
Applications announcing the competition.
(b) The Secretary distributes grants equitably among urban and
rural areas by taking into consideration such factors as the following:
(1) The poverty rate in urban and rural communities;
(2) The number of people in poverty in urban and rural communities;
and
(3) The quality of proposals received. (WIA sec.169(a) and (e).)
Sec. 664.810 How does a Local Board or other entity become eligible to
receive a Youth Opportunity Grant?
(a) A Local Board is eligible to receive a Youth Opportunity Grant
if it serves a community that:
(1) Has been designated as an empowerment zone (EZ) or enterprise
community (EC) under section 1391 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986;
(2) Is located in a State that does not have an EZ or an EC and
that has been designated by its Governor as a high poverty area; or
(3) Is one of two areas in a State that has been designated by the
Governor as an area for which a local board may apply for a Youth
Opportunity Grant, and that meets the poverty rate criteria in sections
1392 (a)(4), (b), and (d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
(b) An entity other than a Local Board is eligible to receive a
grant if that entity:
(1) Is a WIA Indian and Native American grant recipient under WIA
sec. 166; and
(2) Serves a community that:
(i) Meets the poverty rate criteria in sections 1392(a)(4), (b),
and (d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; and
(ii) Is located on an Indian reservation or serves Oklahoma Indians
or Alaska Native villages or Native groups, as provided in WIA section
169 (d)(2)(B). (WIA sec. 169(c) and (d).)
Sec. 664.820 Who is eligible to receive services under Youth
Opportunity Grants?
All individuals ages 14 through 21 who reside in the community
identified in the grant are eligible to receive services under the
grant. (WIA sec. 169(a).)
Sec. 664.830 How are performance measures for Youth Opportunity Grants
determined?
(a) The Secretary negotiates performance measures, including
appropriate performance levels for each indicator, with each selected
grantee, based on information contained in the application.
(b) Performance indicators for the measures negotiated under Youth
Opportunity Grants are the indicators of performance provided in WIA
sections. 136 (b)(2)(A) and (B). (WIA sec. 169(f).)
PART 665--STATEWIDE WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES UNDER TITLE I
OF THE WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT
Subpart A--General Description
Sec.
665.100 What are the Statewide workforce investment activities
under title I of WIA?
665.110 How are Statewide workforce investment activities funded?
Subpart B--Required and Allowable Statewide Workforce Investment
Activities
Sec. 665.200 What are required Statewide workforce investment
activities?
665.210 What are allowable Statewide workforce investment
activities?
665.220 Who is an ``incumbent worker'' for purposes of Statewide
workforce investment activities?
Subpart C--Rapid Response Activities
665.300 What are rapid response activities and who is responsible
for providing them?
665.310 What rapid response activities are required?
665.320 May other activities may be undertaken as part of rapid
response?
665.330 Are the NAFTA/TAA requirements for rapid response also
required activities?
Authority: Section 506(c), Pub. L. 105-220; 20 USC 9276(c)
Subpart A--General Description
Sec. 665.100 What are the Statewide workforce investment activities
under title I of WIA?
Statewide workforce investment activities include Statewide
employment and training activities for adults and dislocated workers,
as described in WIA section 134(a), and Statewide youth activities, as
described in WIA section 129 (b). They include both required and
allowable activities. In accordance with the requirements of this
subpart, the State may develop policies and strategies for use of
Statewide workforce investment funds. Descriptions of these policies
and strategies must be included in the State Plan. (WIA secs. 129(b);
134(a).)
Sec. 665.110 How are Statewide workforce investment activities funded?
(a) Except for the Statewide rapid response activities described in
paragraph (c) of this section, Statewide workforce investment
activities are
[[Page 18718]]
supported by funds reserved by the Governor under WIA section 128(a).
(b) Funds reserved by the Governor for Statewide workforce
investment activities may be combined and used for any of the
activities authorized in WIA secstions 129(b), 134(a)(2)(B) or
134(a)(3)(A) (which are described in Secs. 665.200 and 665.210),
regardless of whether the funds were allotted through the youth, adult,
or dislocated worker funding streams.
(c) Funds for Statewide rapid response activities are reserved
under WIA sec. 133(a)(2) and may be used to provide the activities
authorized at sec. 134(a)(2)(A) (which are described in Secs. 665.310
to 665.330 of this part). (WIA secs 129(b); 133(a)(2); 134(a)(2)(B);
and 134(a)(3)(A).)
Subpart B--Required and Allowable Statewide Workforce Investment
Activities
Sec. 665.200 What are required Statewide workforce investment
activities?
Required Statewide workforce investment activities are:
(a) Required rapid response activities, as described in
Sec. 665.310 of this part;
(b) Disseminating:
(1) The State list of eligible providers of training services
(including those providing non-traditional training services), for
adults and dislocated workers;
(2) Information identifying eligible providers of on-the-job
training and customized training;
(3) Performance and program cost information about these providers,
as described in 20 CFR 663.540; and
(4) A list of eligible providers of youth activities as described
in WIA section 123;
(c) Conducting evaluations, under WIA section 136(e), of workforce
investment activities for adults, dislocated workers and youth, in
order to establish and promote methods for continuously improving such
activities to achieve high-level performance within, and high-level
outcomes from, the Statewide workforce investment system. Such
evaluations must be conducted in coordination with local boards in the
State and, to the maximum extent practicable, in coordination with
Federal evaluations carried out under WIA section 172.
(d) Providing incentive grants:
(1) To local areas for regional cooperation among local boards
(including local boards for a designated region, as described in 20 CFR
661.290);
(2) For local coordination of activities carried out under WIA; and
(3) For exemplary performance by local areas on the performance
measures.
(e) Providing technical assistance to local areas that fail to meet
local performance measures.
(f) Assisting in the establishment and operation of One-Stop
delivery systems, in accordance with the strategy described in the
State workforce investment plan. [WIA sec. 112(b)(14).]
(g) Providing additional assistance to local areas that have high
concentrations of eligible youth.
(h) Operating a fiscal and management accountability information
system, based on guidelines established by the Secretary after
consultation with the Governors, chief elected officials, and One-Stop
partners, as required by WIA section 136(f). (WIA secs. 129(b)(2) and
134(a)(2).)
Sec. 665.210 What are allowable Statewide workforce investment
activities?
Allowable Statewide workforce investment activities include:
(a) State administration of the adult, dislocated worker and youth
workforce investment activities, consistent with the five percent
administrative cost limitation at 20 CFR 667.210(a)(1).
(b) Providing capacity building and technical assistance to local
areas, including Local Boards, One-Stop operators, One-Stop partners,
and eligible providers, which may include:
(1) Staff development and training; and
(2) The development of exemplary program activities.
(c) Conducting research and demonstrations.
(d) Establishing and implementing innovative incumbent worker
training programs, which may include an employer loan program to assist
in skills upgrading, and programs targeted to empowerment zones and
enterprise communities.
(e) Providing support to local areas for the identification of
eligible training providers.
(f) Implementing innovative programs for displaced homemakers, and
programs to increase the number of individuals trained for and placed
in non-traditional employment.
(g) Carrying out adult and dislocated worker employment and
training activities as the State determines are necessary to assist
local areas in carrying out local employment and training activities.
(h) Carrying out youth activities Statewide.
(i) Preparation and submission to the Secretary of the annual
performance progress report as described in 20 CFR 667.300(e). (WIA
secs. 129(b)(3) and 134(a)(3).)
Sec. 665.220 Who is an ``incumbent worker'' for purposes of Statewide
workforce investment activities?
States may establish policies and definitions to determine which
workers are eligible for incumbent worker services under this subpart.
An incumbent worker is an individual who is employed, but an incumbent
worker does not necessarily have to meet the eligibility requirements
for intensive and training services for employed adults and dislocated
workers at 20 CRF 663.220(a)(2) and 663.310. (WIA sec.
134(a)(3)(A)(iv)(I).)
Subpart C--Rapid Response Activities
Sec. 665.300 What are rapid response activities and who is responsible
for providing them?
(a) Rapid response activities are described in Secs. 665.310
through 665.330 of this part. They encompass the activities necessary
to plan and deliver services to enable dislocated workers to transition
to new employment as quickly as possible, following either a permanent
closure or mass layoff, or a natural or other disaster resulting in a
mass job dislocation.
(b) The State is responsible for providing rapid response
activities. Rapid response is a required activity carried out in local
areas by the State, or an entity designated by the State, in
conjunction with the Local Board and chief elected officials. The State
must establish methods by which to provide additional assistance to
local areas that experience disasters, mass layoffs, plant closings, or
other dislocation events when such events substantially increase the
number of unemployed individuals.
(c) States must establish a rapid response dislocated worker unit
to carry out Statewide rapid response activities. (WIA secs. 101(38),
112(b)(17)(A)(ii) and 134(a)(2)(A).)
Sec. 665.310 What rapid response activities are required?
Rapid response activities must include:
(a) On-site contact with the employer, representatives of the
affected workers, and the local community, which may include an
assessment of the:
(1) Layoff plans and schedule of the employer;
(2) Potential for averting the layoff(s) in consultation with State
or local economic development agencies, including private sector
economic development entities;
(3) Background and probable assistance needs of the affected
workers;
[[Page 18719]]
(4) Reemployment prospects for workers in the local community; and
(5) Available resources to meet the short and long-term assistance
needs of the affected workers;
(b) The provision of information and access to unemployment
compensation benefits, comprehensive One-Stop system services, and
employment and training activities, including information on the Trade
Adjustment Assistance program and the NAFTA-TAA program;
(c) The provision of guidance and/or financial assistance in
establishing a labor-management committee voluntarily agreed to by
labor and management, or a workforce transition committee comprised of
representatives of the employer, the affected workers and the local
community. The committee may devise and oversee an implementation
strategy that responds to the reemployment needs of the workers. The
assistance to this committee may include:
(1) The provision of training and technical assistance to members
of the committee;
(2) Funding the operating costs of a committee to enable it to
provide advice and assistance in carrying out rapid response activities
and in the design and delivery of WIA-authorized services to affected
workers. Typically, such support will last no longer than six months;
and
(3) Providing a list of potential candidates to serve as a neutral
chairperson of the committee.
(d) The provision of emergency assistance adapted to the particular
closing, layoff or disaster.
(e) The provision of assistance to the local board and chief
elected official(s) to develop a coordinated response to the
dislocation event and, as needed, obtain access to State economic
development assistance. Such coordinated response may include the
development of an application for National Emergency Grant under 20 CFR
part 671. (WIA secs. 101(38) and 134(a)(2)(A).)
Sec. 665.320 May other activities be undertaken as part of rapid
response?
Yes. A State or designated entity may provide additional rapid
response activities in addition to the activities required to be
provided under Sec. 665.310. In order to provide effective rapid
response upon notification of a permanent closure or mass layoff, or a
natural or other disaster resulting in a mass job dislocation, the
State or designated entity may:
(a) In conjunction, with other appropriate Federal, State and Local
agencies and officials, employer associations, technical councils or
other industry business councils, and labor organizations:
(1) Develop prospective strategies for addressing dislocation
events, that ensure rapid access to the broad range of allowable
assistance;
(2) Identify strategies for the aversion of layoffs; and
(3) Develop and maintain mechanisms for the regular exchange of
information relating to potential dislocations, available adjustment
assistance, and the effectiveness of rapid response strategies.
(b) In collaboration with the appropriate State agency(ies),
collect and analyze information related to economic dislocations,
including potential closings and layoffs, and all available resources
in the State for dislocated workers in order to provide an adequate
basis for effective program management, review and evaluation of rapid
response and layoff aversion efforts in the State.
(c) Participate in capacity building activities, including
providing information about innovative and successful strategies for
serving dislocated workers, with local areas serving smaller layoffs.
(d) Assist in devising and overseeing strategies for:
(1) Layoff aversion, such as prefeasibility studies of avoiding a
plant closure through an option for a company or group, including the
workers, to purchase the plant or company and continue it in operation;
(2) Incumbent worker training, including employer loan programs for
employee skill upgrading; and
(3) Linkages with economic development activities at the Federal,
State and local levels, including Federal Department of Commerce
programs and available State and local business retention and
recruitment activities.
Sec. 665.330 Are the NAFTA/TAA requirements for rapid response also
required activities?
The Governor must ensure that rapid response activities under WIA
are made available to workers who, under the NAFTA Worker Security Act
(Pub. L. 103-182), are members of a group of workers (including those
in any agricultural firm or subdivision of an agricultural firm) for
which the Governor has made a finding that:
(a) The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision
have decreased absolutely, and
(b)(1) Imports from Mexico or Canada of articles like or directly
competitive with those produced by such firm or subdivision have
increased; or
(2) There has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or
subdivision to Mexico or Canada of articles which are produced by the
firm or subdivision.
PART 666--PERFORMANCE ACCOUNTABILITY UNDER TITLE I OF THE WORKFORCE
INVESTMENT ACT
Subpart A--State Measures of Performance
Sec.
666.100 What performance indicators must be included in a State's
plan?
666.110 May a Governor require additional indicators of
performance?
666.120 What are the procedures for negotiating annual levels of
performance?
666.130 Under what conditions may a State or DOL request revisions
to the State adjusted levels of performance?
666.140 Which individuals receiving services are included in the
core indicators of performance?
666.150 What responsibility do States have to use quarterly wage
record information for performance accountability?
Subpart B--Incentives and Sanctions for State Performance
666.200 Under what circumstances is a State eligible for an
Incentive Grant?
666.205 What are the time frames under which States submit
performance progress reports and apply for incentive grants?
666.210 How may Incentive Grant funds be used?
666.220 What information must be included in State Board's
application for an Incentive Grant?
666.230 How will the Department determine the amounts for Incentive
Grant awards?
666.240 Under what circumstances may a sanction be applied to a
State that fails to achieve adjusted levels of performance for title
I?
Subpart C--Local Measures of Performance
666.300 What performance indicators apply to local areas?
666.310 What levels of performance apply to the indicators of
performance in local areas?
Subpart D--Incentives and Sanctions for Local Performance
666.400 Under what circumstances are local areas eligible for State
Incentive Grants?
666.410 How may local incentive awards be used?
666.420 Under what circumstances may a sanction be applied to local
areas for poor performance?
Authority: Sec. 506(c), Pub. L. 105-220; 20 U.S.C. 9276(c).
[[Page 18720]]
Subpart A--State Measures of Performance
Sec. 666.100 What performance indicators must be included in a State's
plan?
(a) All States submitting a State Plan under WIA title I, subtitle
B must propose expected levels of performance for each of the core
indicators of performance for the adult, dislocated worker and youth
programs, respectively and the two customer satisfaction indicators.
(1) For the Adult program, these indicators are:
(i) Entry into unsubsidized employment;
(ii) Retention in unsubsidized employment six months after entry
into the employment;
(iii) Earnings received in unsubsidized employment six months after
entry into the employment; and
(iv) Attainment of a recognized credential related to achievement
of educational skills (such as a secondary school diploma or its
recognized equivalent), or occupational skills, by participants who
enter unsubsidized employment.
(2) For the Dislocated Worker program, these indicators are:
(i) Entry into unsubsidized employment;
(ii) Retention in unsubsidized employment six months after entry
into the employment;
(iii) Earnings received in unsubsidized employment six months after
entry into the employment; and
(iv) Attainment of a recognized credential related to achievement
of educational skills (such as a secondary school diploma or its
recognized equivalent), or occupational skills, by participants who
enter unsubsidized employment.
(3) For the Youth program, these indicators are:
(i) For eligible youth aged 14 through 18:
(A) Attainment of basic skills, and, as appropriate, work readiness
or occupational skills;
(B) Attainment of secondary school diplomas and their recognized
equivalents; and
(C) Placement and retention in postsecondary education, advanced
training, military service, employment, or qualified apprenticeships.
(ii) For eligible youth aged 19 through 21:
(A) Entry into unsubsidized employment;
(B) Retention in unsubsidized employment six months after entry
into the employment;
(C) Earnings received in unsubsidized employment six months after
entry into the employment; and
(D) Attainment of a recognized credential related to achievement of
educational skills (such as a secondary school diploma or its
recognized equivalent), or occupational skills, by participants who
enter post-secondary education, advanced training, or unsubsidized
employment.
(4) A single customer satisfaction measure for employers and a
single customer satisfaction indicator for participants must be used
for the WIA title I, subtitle B programs for adults, dislocated workers
and youth. (WIA sec. 136(b)(2).)
(b) After consultation with the representatives identified in WIA
secs. 136(i) and 502(b), the Departments of Labor and Education will
issue definitions for the performance indicators established under
title I and title II of WIA. (WIA secs. 136(b), (f) and (i).)
Sec. 666.110 May a Governor require additional indicators of
performance?
Yes. Governors may develop additional indicators of performance for
adults, youth and dislocated worker activities. These indicators must
be included in the State Plan. (WIA sec. 136(b)(2)(C).)
Sec. 666.120 What are the procedures for negotiating annual levels of
performance?
(a) The Department issues instructions on the specific information
that must accompany the State Plan and that is used to review the
State's expected levels of performance. The instructions may require
that levels of performance for years two and three be expressed as a
percentage improvement over the immediately preceding year's actual
performance, consistent with the objective of continuous improvement.
(b) States must submit expected levels of performance for the
required indicators for each of the first three program years covered
by the Plan.
(c) The Secretary and the Governor must reach agreement on levels
of performance for each core indicator and the customer satisfaction
indicators. In negotiating these levels, the following must be taken
into account:
(1) The expected levels of performance identified in the State
Plan;
(2) The extent to which the levels of performance for each core
indicator assist in achieving high customer satisfaction;
(3) The extent to which the levels of performance promote
continuous improvement and ensure optimal return on the investment of
Federal funds; and
(4) How the levels compare with those of other States, taking into
account factors including differences in economic conditions,
participant characteristics, and the proposed service mix and
strategies.
(d) The levels of performance agreed to under paragraph (c) of this
section will be the State's adjusted levels of performance for the
first three years of the State Plan. These levels will used to
determine whether sanctions will be applied or incentive grant funds
will be awarded.
(e) Before the fourth year of the State Plan, the Secretary and the
Governor must reach agreement on levels of performance for each core
indicator and the customer satisfaction indicators for the fourth and
fifth years covered by the plan. In negotiating these levels, the
factors listed in paragraph (c) of this section must be taken into
account.
(f) The levels of performance agreed to under paragraph (e) of this
section will be the State adjusted levels of performance for the fourth
and fifth years of the plan and must be incorporated into the State
Plan.
(g) Levels of performance for the additional indicators developed
by the Governor are considered to be State adjusted levels of
performance, but are not part of the negotiations described in
paragraphs (c) and (e) of this section. (WIA sec. 136(b)(3).)
(h) State adjusted levels of performance may be revised in
accordance with Sec. 666.130 of this subpart.
Sec. 666.130 Under what conditions may a State or DOL request
revisions to the State adjusted levels of performance?
(a) The DOL guidelines describe when and under what circumstances a
Governor may request revisions to negotiated levels. These
circumstances include significant changes in economic conditions, in
the characteristics of participants entering the program, or in the
services to be provided from when the initial plan was submitted and
approved. (WIA sec. 136(b)(3)(A)(vi).)
(b) The guidelines will establish the circumstances under which a
State will be required to submit revisions under specified
circumstances.
Sec. 666.140 Which individuals receiving services are included in the
core indicators of performance?
(a) The core indicators of performance apply to all individuals who
are registered under 20 CFR 663.105 and 664.215 for the adult,
dislocated worker and youth programs, except for those adults and
dislocated workers who participate exclusively in self-service or
[[Page 18721]]
informational activities. (WIA sec. 136(b)(2)(A).)
(b) For registered participants, a standardized record that
includes appropriate performance information must be maintained in
accordance with WIA section 185(a)(3).
Sec. 666.150 What responsibility do States have to use quarterly wage
record information for performance accountability?
(a) States must, consistent with State law, use quarterly wage
record information in measuring the progress on State and local
performance measures.
(b) The State must include in the State Plan a description of the
State's performance accountability system, and a description of the
State's strategy for using quarterly wage record information to measure
the progress on State and local performance measures. The description
must identify the entities that may have access to quarterly wage
record information for this purpose.
(c) ``Quarterly wage record information'' means information
regarding wages paid to an individual, the social security account
number (or numbers, if more than one) of the individual and the name,
address, State, and (when known) the Federal employer identification
number of the employer paying the wages to the individual. (WIA sec.
136(f)(2).)
Subpart B--Incentives and Sanctions for State Performance
Sec. 666.200 Under what circumstances is a State eligible for an
Incentive Grant?
A State is eligible to apply for an Incentive Grant if its
performance for the immediately preceding year exceeds:
(a) The State's adjusted levels of performance for the required
core indicators for the adult, dislocated worker and youth programs
under title I of WIA as well as the customer satisfaction indicators
for WIA title I programs;
(b) The adjusted levels of performance included in plans submitted
to the Department of Education for title II Adult Education and
Literacy programs; and
(c) The adjusted levels of performance under title I of the Carl D.
Perkins Vocational and Technical Education Act (20 U.S.C. 2301 et
seq.). (WIA sec. 503.)
Sec. 666.205 What are the time frames under which States submit
performance progress reports and apply for incentive grants?
(a) State performance progress reports must be filed by the due
date established in reporting instructions issued by the Department.
(b) Based upon the reports filed under paragraph (a) of this
section, the Secretary will determine the amount of funds available,
under WIA title I, to each eligible State for incentive grants, in
accordance with the criteria of Sec. 666.230. The award amounts for
each eligible State will be published by the Secretary, after
consultation with the Secretary of Education, within ninety (90) days
after the due date for performance progress reports established under
paragraph (a) of this section.
(c) Within forty-five (45) days of the publication of award amounts
under paragraph (b) of this section, States may apply for incentive
grants in accordance with the requirements of Sec. 666.220.
Sec. 666.210 How may Incentive Grant funds be used?
Incentive grant funds are awarded to States to carry out any one or
more innovative programs under titles I or II of WIA or the Carl D.
Perkins Vocational and Technical Education Act, regardless of which Act
is the source of the incentive funds. (WIA section 503(a).)
Sec. 666.220 What information must be included in State Board's
application for an Incentive Grant?
(a) The Secretary of Labor, after consultation with the Secretary
of Education, will issue instructions annually which will include the
amount of funds available to be awarded for each State and provide
instructions for submitting applications for an Incentive Grant.
(b) Each State desiring an incentive grant must submit to the
Secretary an application, developed by the State Board, containing the
following assurances:
(1) The State legislature was consulted regarding the development
of the application.
(2) The application was approved by the Governor, the eligible
agency (as defined in WIA section 203), and the State agency
responsible for vocational and technical programs under the Carl D.
Perkins Vocational and Technical Education Act.
(3) The State exceeded the State adjusted levels of performance for
title I, the adjusted levels of performance under title II and the
adjusted levels for vocational and technical programs under the Carl D.
Perkins Vocational and Technical Education Act. (WIA section 503(b).)
Sec. 666.230 How does the Department determine the amounts for
Incentive Grant awards?
(a) DOL determines the total amount to be allocated from funds
available under WIA section 174(b) for Incentive Grants taking into
consideration such factors as:
(1) The availability of funds under section 174(b) for technical
assistance, demonstration and pilot projects, evaluations, and
Incentive Grants and the needs for these activities;
(2) The number of States that are eligible for Incentive Grants and
their relative program formula allocations under title I;
(3) The availability of funds under WIA section 136(g)(2) resulting
from funds withheld for poor performance by States; and
(4) The range of awards established in WIA section 503(c).
(b) The award amount for eligible States will be published by the
Secretary of Labor, after consultation with the Secretary of Education,
within 90 days after the due date established under Sec. 666.205(a) of
the latest State performance progress report providing the annual
information needed to determine State eligibility.
(c) In determining the amount available to an eligible State, the
Secretary, with the Secretary of Education, may consider such factors
as:
(1) The relative allocations of the eligible State compared to
other States;
(2) The extent to which the adjusted levels of performance were
exceeded;
(3) Performance improvement relative to previous years;
(4) Changes in economic conditions, participant characteristics and
proposed service design since the adjusted levels of performance were
negotiated;
(5) The eligible State's relative performance for each of the
indicators compared to other States; and
(6) The performance on those indicators considered most important
in terms of accomplishing national goals established by each of the
respective Secretaries.
Sec. 666.240 Under what circumstances may a sanction be applied to a
State that fails to achieve adjusted levels of performance for title I?
(a) If a State fails to meet the adjusted levels of performance
agreed to under Sec. 666.120 for core indicators of performance or
customer satisfaction indicators for the adult, dislocated worker or
youth program under title I of WIA, the Secretary must, upon request,
provide technical assistance, as authorized under WIA sections 136(g)
and 170.
[[Page 18722]]
(b) If a State fails to meet the adjusted levels of performance for
core indicators of performance or customer satisfaction indicators for
the same program in two successive years, the amount of the succeeding
year's allocation for the applicable program may be reduced by up to
five percent.
(c) The exact amount of any allocation reduction will be based upon
the degree of failure to meet the adjusted levels of performance for
core indicators. In making a determination of the amount, if any, of
such a sanction, the Department may consider factors such as:
(1) The State's performance relative to other States;
(2) Improvement efforts underway;
(3) Incremental improvement on the performance measures;
(4) Technical assistance previously provided;
(5) Changes in economic conditions and program design;
(6) The characteristics of participants served compared to the
participant characteristics described in the State Plan; and
(7) Performance on other core indicators of performance and
customer satisfaction indicators for that program. (WIA section
136(g).)
(d) In accordance with 20 CFR 667.300(e), a State grant may be
reduced for failure to submit an annual performance progress report.
(e) A State may request review of a sanction imposed by the
Department in accordance with the provisions of 20 CFR 667.800.
Subpart C--Local Measures of Performance
Sec. 666.300 What performance indicators apply to local areas?
(a) Each local workforce investment area in a State is subject to
the same core indicators of performance and the customer satisfaction
indicators that apply to the State under Sec. 666.100(a).
(b) In addition to the indicators described in paragraph (a) of
this section, under Sec. 666.110 of this part, the Governor may apply
additional indicators of performance to local areas in the State. (WIA
sec. 136(c)(1).)
Sec. 666.310 What levels of performance apply to the indicators of
performance in local areas?
(a) The Local Board and the chief elected official must negotiate
with the Governor and reach agreement on the local levels of
performance for each indicator identified in Sec. 666.300 of this
subpart. The levels must be based on the State adjusted levels of
performance established under Sec. 666.120 and take into account the
factors described in paragraph (b) of this section.
(b) In determining the appropriate local levels of performance, the
Governor, Local Board and chief elected official must take into account
specific economic, demographic and other characteristics of the
populations to be served in the local area.
(c) The performance levels agreed to under paragraph (a) of this
section must be incorporated in the local plan. (WIA secs. 118(b)(3)
and 136(c).)
Subpart D--Incentives and Sanctions for Local Performance
Sec. 666.400 Under what circumstances are local areas eligible for
State Incentive Grants?
(a) States must use a portion of the funds reserved for Statewide
workforce investment activities under WIA sections 128(a) and 133(a)(1)
to provide Incentive Grants to local areas for regional cooperation
among local boards (including local boards for a designated region as
described in WIA section 116(c)), for local coordination of activities
carried out under this Act, and for exemplary performance on the local
performance measures established under subpart C of this part.
(b) The amount of funds used for Incentive Grants under paragraph
(a) of this section and the criteria used for determining exemplary
local performance levels to qualify for the incentive grants are
determined by the Governor. (WIA sec. 134(a)(2)(B)(iii).)
Sec. 666.410 How may local incentive awards be used?
The local incentive grant funds may be used for any activities
allowed under WIA title I-B.
Sec. 666.420 Under what circumstances may a sanction be applied to
local areas for poor performance?
(a) If a local area fails to meet the levels of performance agreed
to under Sec. 666.310 for the core indicators of performance or
customer satisfaction indicators for a program in any program year,
technical assistance must be provided. The technical assistance must be
provided by the Governor with funds reserved for Statewide workforce
investment activities under WIA sections 128(a) and 133(a)(1), or, upon
the Governor's request, by the Secretary. The technical assistance may
include the development of a performance improvement plan, a modified
local plan, or other actions designed to assist the local area in
improving performance.
(b) If a local area fails to meet the levels of performance agreed
to under Sec. 666.310 for the core indicators of performance or
customer satisfaction indicators for a program for two consecutive
program years, the Governor must take corrective actions. The
corrective actions may include the development of a reorganization plan
under which the Governor:
(1) Requires the appointment and certification of a new Local
Board;
(2) Prohibits the use of particular service providers or One-Stop
partners that have been identified as achieving poor levels of
performance; or
(3) Requires other appropriate measures designed to improve the
performance of the local area.
(c) A local area may appeal to the Governor to rescind or revise a
reorganization plan imposed under paragraph (b) of this section not
later than thirty (30) days after receiving notice of the plan. The
Governor must make a final decision within 30 days after receipt of the
appeal. The Governor's final decision may be appealed by the Local
Board to the Secretary under 20 CFR 667.650(b) not later than thirty
(30) days after the local areas receives the decision. The decision by
the Governor to impose a reorganization plan becomes effective at the
time it is issued, and remains effective unless the Secretary rescinds
or revises the reorganization plan. Upon receipt of the appeal from the
local area, the Secretary must make a final decision within thirty (30)
days. (WIA sec. 136(h).)
PART 667--ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS UNDER TITLE I OF THE WORKFORCE
INVESTMENT ACT
Subpart A--Funding
Sec.
667.100 When do Workforce Investment Act grant funds become
available?
667.105 What award document authorizes the expenditure of Workforce
Investment Act funds under title I of the Act?
667.107 What is the period of availability for expenditure of WIA
funds?
667.110 What is the Governor/Secretary Agreement?
667.120 What planning information must a State submit in order to
receive a formula grant?
667.130 How are WIA title I formula funds allocated to local
workforce investment areas?
667.140 Does a local board have the authority to transfer funds
between programs?
667.150 What reallotment procedures does the Secretary use?
667.160 What reallocation procedures must the Governors use?
667.170 What responsibility review does the Department conduct for
awards made under WIA title I, subtitle D?
[[Page 18723]]
Subpart B--Administrative Rules, Costs and Limitations
667.200 What general fiscal and administrative rules apply to the
use of WIA title I funds?
667.210 What administrative cost limits apply to Workforce
Investment Act title I grants?
667.220 What Workforce Investment Act title I functions and
activities constitute the costs of administration subject to the
administrative cost limit?
667.250 What requirements relate to the enforcement of the Military
Selective Service Act?
667.260 May WIA title I funds be spent for construction?
667.262 Are employment generating activities, or similar
activities, allowable under WIA title I?
667.264 What other activities are prohibited under title I of WIA?
667.266 What are the limitations related to sectarian activities?
667.268 What prohibitions apply to the use of WIA title I funds to
encourage business relocation?
667.269 What procedures and sanctions apply to violations of
Secs. 667.260 to 667.268?
667.270 What safeguards are there to ensure that participants in
Workforce Investment Act employment and training activities do not
displace other employees?
667.272 What wage and labor standards apply to participants in
activities under title I of WIA?
667.274 What health and safety standards apply to the working
conditions of participants in activities under title I of WIA?
667.275 What are a recipient's obligations to ensure
nondiscrimination and equal opportunity, as well as nonparticipation
in sectarian activities?
Subpart C--Reporting Requirements
667.300 What are the reporting requirements for Workforce
Investment Act programs?
Subpart D--Oversight and Monitoring
667.400 Who is responsible for oversight and monitoring of WIA
title I grants?
667.410 What are the oversight roles and responsibilities of
recipients and subrecipients?
Subpart E--Resolution of Findings From Monitoring and Oversight Reviews
667.500 What procedures apply to the resolution of findings arising
from audits, investigations, monitoring and oversight reviews?
667.505 How does the Department resolve investigative and
monitoring findings?
667.510 What is the Grant Officer resolution process?
Subpart F--Grievance Procedures, Complaints, and State Appeals
Processes
667.600 What local area, State and direct recipient grievance
procedures must be established?
667.610 What processes does the Secretary use to review State and
local grievances and complaints?
667.630 How are complaints and reports of criminal fraud and abuse
addressed under WIA?
667.640 What additional appeal processes or systems must a State
have for the WIA program?
667.645 What procedures apply to the appeals of non-designation of
local areas?
667.650 What procedures apply to the appeals of the Governor's
imposition of sanctions for substantial violations or performance
failures by a local areas?
Subpart G--Sanctions, Corrective Actions, and Waiver of Liability
667.700 What procedure does the Department utilize to impose
sanctions and corrective actions on recipients and subrecipients of
WIA grant funds?
667.705 Who is responsible for funds provided under title I of WIA?
667.710 What actions are required to address the failure of a local
area to comply with the applicable uniform administrative
provisions?
667.720 How does the Department handle a recipient's request for
waiver of liability under WIA section 184(d)(2)?
667.730 What is the procedure to handle a recipient's request for
advance approval of contemplated corrective actions?
667.740 What procedure must be used for administering the offset/
deduction provisions at WIA section 184(c)?
Subpart H--Administrative Adjudication and Judicial Review
667.800 What actions of the Department may be appealed to the
Office of Administrative Law Judges?
667.810 What rules of procedure apply to hearings conducted under
this subpart?
667.820 What authority will the Administrative Law Judge have in
ordering relief as an outcome of an administrative hearing?
667.825 What special rules apply to reviews of MSFW and WIAINA
grant selections?
667.830 When will the Administrative Law Judge issue a decision?
667.840 Is there an alternative dispute resolution process that may
be used in place of an OALJ hearing?
667.850 Is there judicial review of a final order of the Secretary
issued under WIA section 186?
667.860 Are there other authorities for the pursuit of remedies
outside of the Act?
Subpart I--Transition Planning
667.900 What special rules apply during the JTPA/WIA transition?
Authority: Sec. 506(c), Pub. L. 105-220; 20 U.S.C. 9276(c).
Subpart A--Funding
Sec. 667.100 When do Workforce Investment Act grant funds become
available?
(a) Program year. Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this
section, fiscal year appropriations for programs and activities carried
out under title I of WIA are available for obligation on the basis of a
program year. A program year begins on July 1 in the fiscal year for
which the appropriation is made and ends on June 30 of the following
year.
(b) Youth fund availability. Fiscal year appropriations for a
program year's youth activities, authorized under chapter 4, subtitle
B, title I of WIA, may be made available for obligation beginning on
April 1 of the fiscal year for which the appropriation is made.
Sec. 667.105 What award document authorizes the expenditure of
Workforce Investment Act funds under title I of the Act?
(a) Agreement. All WIA title I funds that are awarded by grant,
contract or cooperative agreement are issued under an agreement between
the Grant Officer/Contracting Officer and the recipient. The agreement
describes the terms and conditions applicable to the award of WIA title
I funds.
(b) Grant funds awarded to States. Under the Governor/Secretary
Agreement described in Sec. 667.110, each program year, the grant
agreement described in paragraph (a) of this section will be executed
and signed by the Governor or the Governor's designated representative
and Secretary or the Grant Officer. The grant agreement and associated
Notices of Obligation are the basis for Federal obligation of funds
allotted to the States in accordance with WIA sections 127(b) and
132(b) for each program year.
(c) Indian and Native American Programs. Awards of grants,
contracts or cooperative agreements for the WIA Indian and Native
American program will be made to eligible entities on a competitive
basis every two program years for a two-year period, in accordance with
the provisions of 20 CFR part 668. An award for the succeeding two-year
period may be made to the same recipient on a non-competitive basis if
the recipient:
(1) Has performed satisfactorily; and
(2) Submits a satisfactory two-year program plan for the succeeding
two-year grant, contract or agreement period.
(d) Migrant and Seasonal Farmworker Programs. (1) Awards of grants
or contracts for the Migrant and Seasonal Farmworker program will be
made to eligible entities on a competitive basis every two program
years for a two-year
[[Page 18724]]
period, in accordance with the provisions of 20 CFR part 669. An award
for the succeeding two-year period may be made to the same recipient if
the recipient:
(i) Has performed satisfactorily; and (ii) Submits a satisfactory
two-year program plan for the succeeding two-year period.
(2) A grant or contract may be renewed under the authority of
paragraph (d)(1) of this section no more than once during any four-year
period for any single recipient.
(e) Job Corps. (1) Awards of contracts will be made on a
competitive basis between the Contracting Officer and eligible entities
to operate contract centers and provide operational support services.
(2) The Secretary may enter into interagency agreements with
Federal agencies for funding, establishment, and operation of Civilian
Conservation Centers for Job Corps programs.
(f) Youth Opportunity Grants. Awards of grants for Youth
Opportunity programs will be made to eligible Local Boards and eligible
entities for a one-year period. The grants may be renewed for each of
the four succeeding years based on criteria that include successful
performance.
(g) Awards under WIA secs. 171 and 172. (1) Awards of grants,
contracts or cooperative agreements will be made to eligible entities
for programs or activities authorized under WIA sections 171 or 172.
These funds are for:
(i) Demonstration;
(ii) Pilot;
(iii) Multi-service;
(iv) Research;
(v) Multi-State projects; and
(vi) Evaluations
(2) Grants and contracts under paragraphs (g)(1)(i) and (ii) of
this section will be awarded on a competitive basis, except that a
noncompetitive award may be made in the case of a project that is
funded jointly with other public or private entities that provide a
portion of the funding.
(3) Contracts and grants under paragraphs (g)(1)(iii), (iv), and
(v) of this section in amounts that exceed $100,000 will be awarded on
a competitive basis, except that a noncompetitive award may be made in
the case of a project that is funded jointly with other public or
private sector entities that provide a substantial portion of the
assistance under the grant or contract for the project.
(4) Grants or contracts for carrying out projects in paragraphs
(g)(1)(iii), (iv), and (v) of this section may not be awarded to the
same organization for more than three consecutive years, unless the
project is competitively reevaluated within that period.
(5) Entities with nationally recognized expertise in the methods,
techniques and knowledge of workforce investment activities will be
provided priority in awarding contracts or grants for the projects
under paragraphs (g)(1)(iii), (iv), and (v) of this section.
(6) A peer review process will be used for projects under
paragraphs (g)(1)(iii), (iv), and (v) of this section for grants that
exceed $500,000, and to designate exemplary and promising programs.
(h) Termination. Each grant terminates when the period of fund
availability has expired. The grant must be closed in accordance with
the closeout provisions at 29 CFR 95.71 or 97.50, as appropriate.
Sec. 667.107 What is the period of availability for expenditure of WIA
funds?
(a) Grant funds expended by States. Funds allotted to States under
WIA sections 127(b) and 132(b), for any program year are available for
expenditure by the State receiving the funds only during that program
year and the two succeeding program years.
(b) Grant funds expended by local areas. (1) Funds allocated by a
State to a local area under WIA section 128(b) and 133(b), for any
program year are available for expenditure only during that program
year and the succeeding program year.
(2) Funds which are not expended by a local area in the two-year
period described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, must be returned
to the State. Funds so returned are available for expenditure by State
and local recipients and subrecipients only during the third program
year of availability. These funds may:
(i) Be used for Statewide projects, or
(ii) Be distributed to other local areas which had fully expended
their allocation of funds for the same program year within the two-year
period.
(c) Job Corps. Funds obligated for any program year for any Job
Corps activity carried out under title I, subtitle C, of WIA, may be
expended during that program year and the two succeeding program years.
(d) Funds awarded under WIA section 171 and 172. (a) Funds
obligated for any program year for a program or activity authorized
under section 171 or 172 of WIA remain available until expended.
(e) Other programs under title I of WIA. For all other grants,
contracts and cooperative agreements issued under title I of WIA the
period of availability for expenditure is set in the terms and
conditions of the award document.
Sec. 667.110 What is the Governor/Secretary Agreement?
(a) To establish a continuing relationship under the Act, the
Governor and the Secretary will enter into a Governor/Secretary
Agreement. The Agreement will consist of a statement assuring that the
State will comply with:
(1) The Workforce Investment Act and all applicable rules and
regulations, and
(2) The Wagner-Peyser Act and all applicable rules and regulations.
(b) The Governor/Secretary Agreement may be modified, revised or
terminated at any time, upon the agreement of both parties.
Sec. 667.120 What planning information must a State submit in order to
receive a formula grant?
Each State seeking financial assistance under WIA sections 127
(youth) or 132 (adults and dislocated workers) or under the Wagner-
Peyser Act must submit a single State Plan. The requirements for the
plan content and the plan review process are described in WIA section
112, Wagner-Peyser section 8, and 20 CFR Sec. 652.6, 652.7, and
661.220.
Sec. 667. 130 How are WIA title I formula funds allocated to local
workforce investment areas?
(a) General. The Governor must allocate WIA formula funds allotted
for services to youth, adults and dislocated workers in accordance with
WIA sections 128 and 133, and this section.
(1) State Boards must assist Governors in the development of any
discretionary within-State allocation formulas. (WIA sec. 111(d)(5).)
(2) Within-State allocations must be made:
(i) In accordance with the allocation formulas contained in WIA
section 128(b) and 133(b) and in the State workforce investment plan,
and (ii) After consultation with chief elected officials in each of the
workforce investment areas.
(b) State Reserve. (1) Of the WIA formula funds allotted for
services to youth, adults and dislocated workers, the Governor must
reserve funds from each of these sources for Statewide workforce
investment activities. In making these reservations, the Governor may
reserve up to fifteen (15) percent from each of these sources. Funds
reserved under this paragraph may be combined and spent on Statewide
employment and training activities, for adults and dislocated workers,
and Statewide youth activities, as described in 20 CFR 665.200 and
665.210, without regard to the funding source of the reserved funds.
[[Page 18725]]
(2) The Governor must reserve a portion of the dislocated worker
funds for Statewide rapid response activities, as described in WIA
section 134(a)(2)(A) and 20 CFR 665.310 through 665.330. In making this
reservation, the Governor may reserve up to twenty-five (25) percent of
the dislocated worker funds.
(c) Youth allocation formula. (1) Unless the Governor elects to
distribute funds in accordance with the discretionary allocation
formula described in paragraph (c)(2) of this section, the remainder of
youth funds not reserved under paragraph (b)(1) of this section must be
allocated:
(i) 33\1/3\ percent on the basis of the relative number of
unemployed individuals in areas of substantial unemployment in each
workforce investment area, compared to the total number of unemployed
individuals in all areas of substantial unemployment in the State;
(ii) 33\1/3\ percent on the basis of the relative excess number of
unemployed individuals in each workforce investment area, compared to
the total excess number of unemployed individuals in the State; and
(iii) 33\1/3\ percent on the basis of the relative number of
disadvantaged youth in each workforce investment area, compared to the
total number of disadvantaged youth in the State. [WIA sec.
128(b)(2)(A)(i)]
(2) Discretionary youth allocation formula. In lieu of making the
formula allocation described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the
State may allocate youth funds under a discretionary formula. Under
that formula, the State must allocate a minimum of 70 percent of youth
funds not reserved under paragraph (b)(1) of this section on the basis
of the formula in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, and may allocate up
to 30 percent on the basis of a formula that:
(i) Incorporates additional factors (other than the factors
described in pargraph (c)(1) of this section) relating to:
(A) Excess youth poverty in urban, rural and suburban local areas;
and
(B) Excess unemployment above the State average in urban, rural and
suburban local areas; and
(ii) Was developed by the State Board and approved by the Secretary
of Labor as part of the State workforce investment plan. (WIA sec.
128(b)(3).)
(d) Adult allocation formula. (1) Unless the Governor elects to
distribute funds in accordance with the discretionary allocation
formula described in paragraph (d)(2) of this section, the remainder of
adult funds not reserved under paragraph (b)(1) of this section must be
allocated:
(i) 33\1/3\ percent on the basis of the relative number of
unemployed individuals in areas of substantial unemployment in each
workforce investment area, compared to the total number of unemployed
individuals in areas of substantial unemployment in the State;
(ii) 33\1/3\ percent on the basis of the relative excess number of
unemployed individuals in each workforce investment area, compared to
the total excess number of unemployed individuals in the State; and
(iii) 33\1/3\ percent on the basis of the relative number of
disadvantaged adults in each workforce investment area, compared to the
total number of disadvantaged adults in the State. (WIA sec.
133(b)(2)(A)(i))
(2) Discretionary adult allocation formula. In lieu of making the
formula allocation described in paragraph (d)(1)of this section, the
State may allocate adult funds under an discretionary formula. Under
that formula, the State must allocate a minimum of 70 percent of adult
funds on the basis of such formula in paragraph (d)(1) of this section,
and may allocate up to 30 percent on the basis of a formula that:
(i) Incorporates additional factors (other than the factors
described in paragraph (d)(1) of this section) relating to:
(A) Excess poverty in urban, rural and suburban local areas; and
(B) Excess unemployment above the State average in urban, rural and
suburban local areas; and
(ii) Was developed by the State Board and approved by the Secretary
of Labor as part of the State workforce investment plan. (WIA sec.
133(b)(3).)
(e) Dislocated worker allocation formula. (1) The remainder of
dislocated worker funds not reserved under paragraph (b)(1) or (b)(2)
of this section must be allocated on the basis of a formula prescribed
by the Governor that distributes funds in a manner that addresses the
State's worker readjustment assistance needs. Funds so distributed must
not be less than 60 percent of the State's formula allotment.
(2)(i) The Governor's dislocated worker formula must use the most
appropriate information available to the Governor, including
information on:
(A) Insured unemployment data,
(B) Unemployment concentrations,
(C) Plant closings and mass layoff data,
(D) Declining industries data,
(E) Farmer-rancher economic hardship data, and
(F) Long-term unemployment data.
(ii) The State Plan must describe the data used for the formula and
the weights assigned, and explain the State's decision to use other
information or to omit any of the information sources set forth in
paragraph (e)(2)(i) of this section.
(3) The Governor may not amend the dislocated worker formula more
than once for any program year.
(4)(i) Dislocated worker funds initially reserved by the Governor
for Statewide rapid response activities in accordance with paragraph
(b)(2) of this section may be:
(A) Distributed to local areas, and (B) Used to operate projects in
local areas in accordance with the requirements of WIA section
134(a)(2)(A) and 20 CFR 665.310 through 665.330.
(ii) The State Plan must describe the procedures for any
distribution to local areas, including the timing and process for
determining whether a distribution will take place.
Sec. 667.140 Does a Local Board have the authority to transfer funds
between programs?
(a) A Local Board may transfer up to 20 percent of a program year
allocation for adult employment and training activities, and up to 20
percent of a program year allocation for dislocated worker employment
and training activities between the two programs.
(b) Before making any such transfer, a Local Board must obtain the
Governor's approval.
(c) Local Boards may not transfer funds to or from the youth
program.
Sec. 667.150 What reallotment procedures does the Secretary use?
(a) The first reallotment of funds among States will occur during
PY 2001 based on obligations in PY 2000.
(b) The Secretary determines, during the first quarter of the
program year, whether a State has obligated its required level of at
least 80 percent of the funds allotted under WIA sections 127 and 132
for programs serving youth, adults, and dislocated workers for the
prior year as separately determined for each of the three funding
streams. Unobligated balances are determined based on allotments
adjusted for any allowable transfer between the adult and dislocated
worker funding streams. The amount to be recaptured from each State for
reallotment, if any, is based on State obligations of the funds
allotted to each State under WIA sections 127 and 132 for programs
serving youth, adults, or dislocated workers, less any amount reserved
(up to 5 percent at the State level and up to 10 percent at the local
[[Page 18726]]
level) for the costs of administration. This amount, if any, is
separately determined for each funding stream.
(c) The Secretary reallots youth, adult and dislocated worker funds
among eligible States in accordance with the provisions of WIA sections
127(c) and 132(c), respectively. To be eligible to receive a
reallotment of youth, adult, or dislocated worker funds under the
reallotment procedures, a State must have obligated at least 80 percent
of the prior program year allotment, less any amount reserved for the
costs of administration of youth, adult, or dislocated worker funds. A
State's eligibility to receive a reallotment is separately determined
for each funding stream.
Sec. 667.160 What reallocation procedures must the Governors use?
(a) The Governor may reallocate youth, adult, and dislocated worker
funds among local areas within the State in accordance with the
provisions of sections 128(c) and 133(c) of the Act. If the Governor
chooses to reallocate funds, the provisions in paragraphs (b) and (c)
of this section apply.
(b) For the youth, adult and dislocated worker programs, the amount
to be recaptured from each local area for purposes of reallocation, if
any, must be based on the amount by which the prior year's unobligated
balance of allocated funds exceeds 20 percent of that year's allocation
for the program, less any amount reserved (up to 10 percent) for the
costs of administration. Unobligated balances must be determined based
on allocations adjusted for any allowable transfer between funding
streams. This amount, if any, must be separately determined for each
funding stream.
(c) To be eligible to receive youth, adult or dislocated worker
funds under the reallocation procedures, a local area must have
obligated at least 80 percent of the prior program year's allocation,
less any amount reserved (up to 10 percent) for the costs of
administration, for youth, adult, or dislocated worker activities, as
separately determined. A local area's eligibility to receive a
reallocation must be separately determined for each funding stream.
Sec. 667.170 What responsibility review does the Department conduct
for awards made under WIA title I, subtitle D?
(a) Before final selection as a potential grantee, the Department
conducts a review of the available records to assess the organization's
overall responsibility to administer Federal funds. As part of this
review, the Department may consider any information that has come to
its attention and will consider the organization's history with regard
to the management of other grants, including DOL grants. The failure to
meet any one responsibility test, except for those listed in paragraphs
(a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section, does not establish that the
organization is not responsible unless the failure is substantial or
persistent (for two or more consecutive years). The responsibility
tests include:
(1) The organization's efforts to recover debts (for which three
demand letters have been sent) established by final agency action have
been unsuccessful, or that there has been failure to comply with an
approved repayment plan;
(2) Established fraud or criminal activity of a significant nature
within the organization.
(3) Serious administrative deficiencies identified by the
Department, such as failure to maintain a financial management system
as required by Federal regulations;
(4) Willful obstruction of the audit process;
(5) Failure to provide services to applicants as agreed to in a
current or recent grant or to meet applicable performance standards;
(6) Failure to correct deficiencies brought to the grantee's
attention in writing as a result of monitoring activities, reviews,
assessments, or other activities;
(7) Failure to return a grant closeout package or outstanding
advances within 90 days of the grant expiration date or receipt of
closeout package, whichever is later, unless an extension has been
requested and granted; final billings reflecting serious cost category
or total budget cost overrun;
(8) Failure to submit required reports;
(9) Failure to properly report and dispose of government property
as instructed by DOL;
(10) Failure to have maintained effective cash management or cost
controls resulting in excess cash on hand;
(11) Failure to ensure that a subrecipient complies with its OMB
Circular A-133 audit requirements specified at Sec. 667.200(b);
(12) Failure to audit a subrecipient within the required period;
(13) Final disallowed costs in excess of five percent of the grant
or contract award if, in the judgement of the grant officer, the
disallowances are egregious findings and;
(14) Failure to establish a mechanism to resolve a subrecipient's
audit in a timely fashion.
(b) This responsibility review is independent of the competitive
process. Applicants which are determined to be not responsible will not
be selected as potential grantees irrespective of their standing in the
competition.
Subpart B--Administrative Rules, Costs and Limitations
Sec. 667.200 What general fiscal and administrative rules apply to the
use of WIA title I funds?
(a) Uniform fiscal and administrative requirements. (1) Except as
provided in paragraphs (a)(3) through (6) of this section, State,
local, and Indian tribal government organizations that receive grants
or cooperative agreements under WIA title I must follow the common rule
``Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative
Agreements to State and Local Governments'' which is codified at 29 CFR
part 97.
(2) Except as provided in paragraphs (a)(3) through (6) of this
section, institutions of higher education, hospitals, and other non-
profit organizations must the follow the common rule implementing OMB
Circular A-110 which is codified at 29 CFR part 95.
(3) In addition to the requirements at 29 CFR 95.48 or 29 CFR
97.36(i) (as appropriate), all procurement contracts and other
transactions between Local Boards and units of State or local
governments must be conducted only on a cost reimbursement basis. No
provision for profit is allowed. (WIA sec. 184(a)(3)(B).)
(4) In addition to the requirements at 29 CFR 95.42 or 29 CFR
97.36(b)(3) (as appropriate), which address codes of conduct and
conflict of interest issues related to employees:
(i) A State Board member or a Local Board member or Youth Council
member must neither cast a vote on, nor participate in, any decision-
making capacity on the provision of services by such member (or any
organization which that member directly represents), nor on any matter
which would provide any direct financial benefit to that member or a
member of his immediate family.
(ii) Neither membership on the State Board, the Local Board or the
Youth Council nor the receipt of WIA funds to provide training and
related services, by itself, violates these conflict of interest
provisions.
(5) The addition method, described at 29 CFR 95.24 or 29 CFR
97.25(g)(2) (as appropriate), must be used for the all program income
earned under WIA title I grants. When the cost of generating program
income has been charged to the program, the gross amount earned must be
added to the WIA program. However,
[[Page 18727]]
the cost of generating program income must be subtracted from the
amount earned to establish the net amount of program income available
for use under the grants when these costs have not been charged to the
WIA program.
(6) Any excess of revenue over costs incurred for services provided
by a governmental or non-profit entity must be included in program
income. (WIA sec. 195(7)(A) and (B).)
(7) On a fee-for-service basis, employers may use local area
services, facilities, or equipment funded under title I of WIA to
provide employment and training activities to incumbent workers:
(i) When the services, facilities, or equipment are not being used
by eligible participants;
(ii) If their use does not affect the ability of eligible
particpants to use the services, facilities, or equipment; and
(iii) If the income generated from such fees is used to carry out
programs authorized under this title.
(b) Audit requirements. (1) All governmental and non-profit
organizations must follow the audit requirements of OMB Circular A-133.
These requirements are found at 29 CFR 97.26 for governmental
organizations and at 29 CFR 95.26 for institutions of higher education,
hospitals, and other non-profit organizations.
(2)(i) The Department is responsible for audits of commercial
organizations which are direct recipients of Federal financial
assistance under WIA title I.
(ii) Commercial organizations which are subrecipients under WIA
title I and which expend more than the minimum level specified in OMB
Circular A-133 ($300,000 as of April 15, 1999) must have either an
organization-wide audit conducted in accordance with A-133 or a program
specific financial and compliance audit.
(c) Allowable costs/cost principles. All recipients and
subrecipients must follow the Federal allowable cost principles that
apply to their kind of organizations. The DOL regulations at 29 CFR
95.27 and 29 CFR 97.22 identify the Federal principles for determining
allowable costs which each kind of recipient and subrecipient must
follow. The applicable Federal principles for each kind of recipient
are described in paragraphs (c)(1) through (5) of this section; all
recipients must comply with paragraph (c)(6) of this section. For those
selected items of cost requiring prior approval, the authority to grant
or deny approval is delegated to the Governor for programs funded under
sections 127 or 132 of the Act.
(1) Allowable costs for State, local, and Indian tribal government
organizations must be determined under OMB Circular A-87, ``Cost
Principles for State, Local and Indian Tribal Governments.''
(2) Allowable costs for non-profit organizations must be determined
under OMB Circular A-122, ``Cost Principles for Non-Profit
Organizations.''
(3) Allowable costs for institutions of higher education must be
determined under OMB Circular A-21, ``Cost Principles for Educational
Institutions.''
(4) Allowable costs for hospitals must be determined in accordance
under appendix E of 45 CFR part 74, ``Principles for Determining Costs
Applicable to Research and Development Under Grants and Contracts with
Hospitals.''
(5) Allowable costs for commercial organizations and those non-
profit organizations listed in Attachment C to OMB Circular A-122 must
be determined under the provisions of the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR), at 48 CFR part 31.
(6) In addition to the allowable cost provisions identified above,
the cost of information technology--computer hardware and software--
will only be allowable under WIA title I grants when such computer
technology is ``Year 2000 compliant.'' To meet this requirement,
information technology must be able to accurately process date/time
(including, but not limited to, calculating, comparing and sequencing)
from, into and between the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, and
the years 1999 and 2000. The information technology must also be able
to make leap year calculations. Furthermore, ``Year 2000 compliant''
information technology, when used in combination with other information
technology, must accurately process date/time data if the other
information technology properly exchanges date/time with it.
(d) Government-wide debarment and suspension, and government-wide
drug-free workplace requirements. All WIA title I grant recipients and
subrecipients must comply with the government-wide requirements for
debarment and suspension, and the government-wide requirements for a
drug-free workplace codified at 29 CFR part 98.
(e) Restrictions on Lobbying. All WIA title I grant recipients and
subrecipients must comply with the restrictions on lobbying which are
codified in the DOL regulations at 29 CFR part 93.
(f) Nondiscrimination. All WIA title I recipients, as the term is
defined in 29 CFR 31.2(h), must comply with the nondiscrimination and
equal opportunity provisions of WIA sec. 188 and its implementing
regulations. Information on the handling of discrimination complaints
by participants and other interested parties may be found at
Sec. 667.600(f) of this part.
(g) Nepotism. (1) No individual may be placed in a WIA employment
activity if a member of that person's immediate family is directly
supervised by or directly supervises that individual.
(2) To the extent that an applicable State or local legal
requirement regarding nepotism is more restrictive than this provision,
such State or local requirement must be followed.
Sec. 667.210 What administrative cost limits apply to Workforce
Investment Act title I grants?
(a) Formula grants to States:
(1) As part of the 15 percent that a State may reserve for
Statewide activities, the State may spend up to five percent (5%) of
the amount allotted under sections 127(b)(1), 132(b)(1) and 132(b)(2)
of the Act for the administrative costs of Statewide workforce
investment activities.
(2) Local area expenditures for administrative purposes under WIA
formula grants are limited to no more than ten percent (10%) of the
amount allocated to the local area under sections 128(b) and 133(b) of
the Act.
(3) Neither the five percent (5%) of the amount allotted that may
be reserved for Statewide administrative costs nor the ten percent
(10%) of the amount allotted that may be reserved for local
administrative costs need to be allocated back to the individual
funding streams.
(b) Limits on administrative costs for programs operated under
subtitle D of title I will be identified in the grant or contract award
document.
(c) Although administrative in nature, costs of information
technology--computer hardware and software--needed for tracking and
monitoring of WIA program, participant, or performance requirements; or
for collecting, storing and disseminating information under the core
services provisions at sections 134(d)(2)(E), (F), (G), (H) and (I) of
the Act, are excluded from the administrative cost limit calculation.
(d) In a One-Stop environment, administrative costs borne by other
sources of funds, such as the Wagner-Peyser Act, are not included in
the administrative cost limit calculation. Each program's
administrative activities area chargeable to its own grant and subject
to its own administrative cost limitations.
[[Page 18728]]
Sec. 667.220 What Workforce Investment Act title I functions and
activities constitute the costs of administration subject to the
administrative cost limit?
(a) The costs of administration are that allocable portion of
necessary and allowable costs that are associated with the overall
management and administration of the workforce investment system and
which are not related to the direct provision of workforce investment
activities. These costs can be both personnel and non-personnel and
both direct and indirect.
(b) The costs of administration include the costs associated with
performing the responsibilities of the State and Local Workforce
Investment Boards and of chief elected officials or boards of chief
elected officials required for the local public/private partnership.
The specific responsibilities of these boards and officials include,
but are not limited to, those identified in the sections of the Act
dealing with workforce investment boards and areas and one-stop
systems, (WIA secs. 111(d), 116, 117(d), (e) & (h)(4), and 121(a)),
such as:
(1) Performing overall general administrative functions and
coordination of those functions under WIA title I including:
(i) Preparing program plans, budgets, related schedules, and
amendments or modifications thereto;
(ii) Negotiating MOUs and awarding specific subgrants, contracts,
and purchase orders through appropriate procurement processes,
(iii) Conducting public relations activities which are not related
to program outreach,
(iv) Developing systems and procedures, including information
systems for assuring compliance with program requirements, except:
(A) Those needed for tracking and monitoring of WIA program,
participant, or performance requirements; or
(B) For collecting, storing and disseminating information under the
core services provisions at WIA sections 134(d)(2)(E), (F), (G), (H)
and (I) and information necessary to comply with WIA section 188 and
its implementing regulations.
(v) Coordinating the resolution of findings arising from audits,
reviews, investigations and incident reports, and
(vi) Performing administrative services, including such services as
general legal services, financial management and accounting services,
audit services; and managing purchasing, property, payroll, and
personnel;
(2) Performing oversight responsibilities including monitoring of
WIA programs, projects and subrecipients, and related systems and
processes for compliance with program requirements,
(3) Costs for goods and services required for administration of the
program, including goods and services such as rental or purchase of
equipment, utilities, office supplies, postage, and rental and
maintenance of office space;
(4) The costs of organization-wide management functions;
(5) Travel costs incurred for official business in carrying out
administrative activities or the overall management of the WIA system;
and
(6) Costs of information systems not related to the tracking and
monitoring of WIA program, participant, or performance requirements; or
for collecting, storing and disseminating information under the core
services provisions at sections 134(d)(2)(E), (F), (G), (H) and (I) of
the Act, (for example, personnel, accounting and payroll systems).
(c)(1) That portion of the costs of One-Stop operators which are
associated with the performance of the administrative functions
described in paragraph (b) of this section are classified as
administrative costs. That portion of the costs of one-stop operators
which are associated with the direct provision of workforce investment
activities are classified as program costs.
(2) Personnel and related non-personnel costs of the recipient's or
subrecipient's staff, including project directors, who perform both
administrative and programmatic services or activities may be allocated
as administrative or program costs to the benefitting cost objectives/
categories based on documented distributions of actual time worked or
other equitable cost allocation methods.
(3) Costs of staff who provide program services directly to
participants and, where applicable, the first line supervisors and/or
team leaders responsible for those staff are classified as a program
cost.
(4) Specific costs charged to an overhead or indirect cost pool
that can be identified directly as a program cost may be charged as a
program cost. Documentation of such charges must be maintained.
(5) The costs of contracts, whether fixed price or cost
reimbursement, awarded for the purpose of obtaining specific goods or
services may be charged to the administration or program category based
on the purpose for which the contract was awarded.
(6) The following information systems and data entry costs are
charged to the program category.
(i) Tracking or monitoring of participant and performance
information;
(ii) Employment statistics information, including job listing
information, job skills information, and demand occupation information;
(iii) Performance and program cost information on eligible
providers of training services, youth activities, and appropriate
education activities;
(iv) Local area performance information; and
(v) Information relating to supportive services and unemployment
insurance claims for program participants;
(7) Continuous improvement activities are charged to administration
or program category based on the purpose or nature of the activity to
be improved. Documentation of such charges must be maintained.
Sec. 667.250 What requirements relate to the enforcement of the
Military Selective Service Act?
The requirements relating to the enforcement of the Military
Selective Service Act are found at WIA section 189(h).
Sec. 667.260 May WIA title I funds be spent for construction?
WIA title I funds must not be spent on construction or purchase of
facilities or buildings except:
(a) To meet a recipient's, as the term is defined in 29 CFR
31.2(h), obligation to provide physical and programmatic accessibility
and reasonable accommodation, as required by section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended;
(b) To fund repairs, alterations and capital improvements of:
(1) SESA real property, identified at WIA section 193, using a
formula that assesses costs proportionate to space utilized;
(2) JTPA owned property which is transferred to WIA title I
programs;
(c) For Job Corps facilities, as authorized by WIA section
160(3)(B); and
(d) To fund disaster relief employment on projects for demolition,
cleaning, repair, renovation, and reconstruction of damaged and
destroyed structures, facilities, and lands located within a disaster
area. (WIA sec. 173(d).)
Sec. 667.262 Are employment generating activities, or similar
activities, allowable under WIA title I?
(a) Under WIA section 181(e), WIA title I funds may not be spent on
[[Page 18729]]
employment generating activities, economic development, and other
similar activities, unless they are directly related to training for
eligible individuals. For purposes of this section, employer outreach
and job development activities are directly related to training for
eligible individuals.
(b) These employer outreach and job development activities include:
(1) Contacts with potential employers for the purpose of placement
of WIA participants;
(2) Participation in business associations (such as chambers of
commerce);
(3) WIA staff participation on economic development boards and
commissions, and work with economic development agencies, to:
(i) Provide information about WIA programs,
(ii) Assist in making informed decisions about community job
training needs, and
(iii) Promote the use of first source hiring agreements and
enterprise zone vouchering services,
(4) Active participation in local business resource centers
(incubators) to provide technical assistance to small and new business
to reduce the rate of business failure;
(5) Subscriptions to relevant publications;
(6) General dissemination of information on WIA programs and
activities;
(7) The conduct of labor market surveys;
(8) The development of on-the-job training opportunities; and (9)
Other allowable WIA activities in the private sector. (WIA sec.
181(e).)
Sec. 667.264 What other activities are prohibited under title I of
WIA?
(a) WIA title I funds must not be spent on:
(1) The wages of incumbent employees during their participation in
economic development activities provided through a Statewide workforce
investment system, (WIA sec. 181(b)(1).);
(2) Public service employment, except to provide disaster relief
employment, as specifically authorized in section 173(d) of WIA, (WIA
sec. 195(10));
(3) Expenses prohibited under any other Federal, State or local law
or regulation.
(b) WIA formula funds available to States and local areas under
subtitle B, title I of WIA must not be used for foreign travel. (WIA
sec. 181(e).)
Sec. 667.266 What are the limitations related to sectarian activities?
(a) WIA title I funds may not be spent on the employment or
training of participants in sectarian activities.
(b) Participants must not be employed under title I of WIA to carry
out the construction, operation, or maintenance of any part of any
facility that is used or to be used for sectarian instruction or as a
place for religious worship. However, WIA funds may be used for the
maintenance of a facility that is not primarily or inherently devoted
to sectarian instruction or religious worship if the organization
operating the facility is part of a program or activity providing
services to WIA participants. (WIA sec. 188(a)(3).)
Sec. 667.268 What prohibitions apply to the use of WIA title I funds
to encourage business relocation?
(a) WIA funds may not be used or proposed to be used for:
(1) The encouragement or inducement of a business, or part of a
business, to relocate from any location in the United States, if the
relocation results in any employee losing his or her job at the
original location;
(2) Customized training, skill training, or on-the-job training or
company specific assessments of job applicants or employees of a
business or a part of a business that has relocated from any location
in the United States, until the company has operated at that location
for 120 days, if the relocation has resulted in any employee losing his
or her jobs at the original location.
(b) Pre-award review. To verify that an establishment which is new
or expanding is not, in fact, relocating employment from another area,
standardized pre-award review criteria developed by the State must be
completed and documented jointly by the local area with the
establishment as a prerequisite to WIA assistance. The review must
include names under which the establishment does business, including
predecessors and successors in interest; the name, title, and address
of the company official certifying the information, and whether WIA
assistance is sought in connection with past or impending job losses at
other facilities, including a review of whether WARN notices relating
to the employer have been filed. (WIA sec. 181(d).)
Sec. 667.269 What procedures and sanctions apply to violations of
Secs. 667.260 through 667.268?
(a) The Secretary will promptly review and take appropriate action
with regard to alleged violations of the provisions relating to:
(1) Employment generating activities (Sec. 667.262);
(2) Other prohibited activities (Sec. 667.264);
(3) The limitation related to sectarian activities (Sec. 667.266);
(4) The use of WIA title I funds to encourage business relocation
(Sec. 667.268).
(b) Procedures for the investigation and resolution of the
violations are provided for under the Grant Officer's resolution
process at Sec. 667.510 of this subpart. Sanctions and remedies are
provided for under WIA section 184(c) for violations of the provisions
relating to:
(1) Construction (Sec. 667.260);
(2) Employment generating activities (Sec. 667.262);
(3) Other prohibited activities (Sec. 667.264); and
(4) The limitation related sectarian activities in
(Sec. 667.266(a)).
(c) Sanctions and remedies are provided for under WIA section
181(d)(3) for violations of Sec. 667.268 of this subpart, which
addresses business relocation.
(d) Violations of Sec. 667.266(b) will be handled in accordance
with the DOL nondiscrimination regulations implementing WIA section
188.
Sec. 667.270 What safeguards are there to ensure that participants in
Workforce Investment Act employment and training activities do not
displace other employees?
(a) A participant in a program or activitiy authorized under title
I of WIA must not displace (including a partial displacement, such as a
reduction in the hours of nonovertime work, wages, or employment
benefits) any currently employed employee (as of the date of the
participation).
(b) A program or activity authorized under title I of WIA must not
impair existing contracts for services or collective bargaining
agreements. When a program or activity authorized under title I of WIA
would be inconsistent with a collective bargaining agreement, the
appropriate labor organization and employer must provide written
concurrence before the program or activity begins.
(c) A participant in a program or activity under title I of WIA may
not be employed in or assigned to a job if:
(1) Any other individual is on layoff from the same or any
substantially equivalent job;
(2) The employer has terminated the employment of any regular,
unsubsidized employee or otherwise caused an involuntary reduction in
its workforce with the intention of filling the vacancy so created with
the WIA participant; or
[[Page 18730]]
(3) The job is created in a promotional line that infringes in any
way on the promotional opportunities of currently employed workers.
(d) Regular employees and program participants alleging
displacement may file a complaint under the applicable grievance
procedures found at Sec. 667.600 of this part. (WIA sec. 181.)
Sec. 667.272 What wage and labor standards apply to participants in
activities under title I of WIA?
(a) Individuals in on-the-job training or individuals employed in
activities under title I of WIA must be compensated at the same rates,
including periodic increases, as trainees or employees who are
similarly situated in similar occupations by the same employer and who
have similar training, experience and skills. Such rates must be in
accordance with applicable law, but may not be less than the higher of
the rate specified in section 6(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act
of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206(a)(1)) or the applicable State or local minimum
wage law.
(b) Individuals in on-the-job training or individuals employed in
programs and activities under Title I of WIA must be provided benefits
and working conditions at the same level and to the same extent as
other trainees or employees working a similar length of time and doing
the same type of work.
(c) Allowances, earnings, and payments to individuals participating
in programs under Title I of WIA are not considered as income for
purposes of determining eligibility for and the amount of income
transfer and in-kind aid furnished under any Federal or Federally
assisted program based on need other than as provided under the Social
Security Act (42 USC 301 et seq.). (WIA sec. 181(a)(2).)
Sec. 667.274 What health and safety standards apply to the working
conditions of participants in activities under title I of WIA?
(a) Health and safety standards established under Federal and State
law otherwise applicable to working conditions of employees are equally
applicable to working conditions of participants engaged in programs
and activities under Title I of WIA.
(b)(1) To the extent that a State workers' compensation law
applies, workers' compensation must be provided to participants in
programs and activities under Title I of WIA on the same basis as the
compensation is provided to other individuals in the State in similar
employment.
(2) If a State workers' compensation law applies to a participant
in work experience, workers' compensation benefits must be available
with respect to injuries suffered by the participant in such work
experience. If a State workers' compensation law does not apply to a
participant in work experience, insurance coverage must be secured for
injuries suffered by the participant in the course of such work
experience.
Sec. 667.275 What are a recipient's obligations to ensure
nondiscrimination and equal opportunity, as well as nonparticipation in
sectarian activities?
(a)(1) Recipients, including State and local workforce investment
boards, One-Stop operators, service providers, vendors and
subrecipients, must comply with the nondiscrimination and equal
opportunity provisions of WIA section 188 and its implementing
regulations.
(2) Nondiscrimination and equal opportunity requirements and
procedures, including complaint processing and compliance reviews, are
governed by the regulations implementing WIA sec. 188 and are
administered and enforced by the DOL Civil Rights Center.
(3) As described in Sec. 667.260(a), funds may be used to meet a
recipient's obligation to provide physical and programmatic
accessibility and reasonable accommodation in regard to the WIA
program, as required by section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,
as amended, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as
amended.
(b) Except with respect to the maintenance of a facility that is
not primarily or inherently devoted to sectarian instruction or
religious worship, in a case in which the organization operating the
facility is part of a program or activity providing services to
participants, the employment or training of participants in sectarian
activities is prohibited.
Subpart C--Reporting Requirements
Sec. 667.300 What are the reporting requirements for Workforce
Investment Act programs?
(a) General. All States and other direct grant recipients must
report financial, participant, and performance data in accordance with
instructions issued by DOL. Required reports must be submitted no more
frequently than quarterly within a time period specified in the
reporting instructions.
(b) Subrecipient reporting. (1) A State or other direct grant
recipient may impose different forms or formats, shorter due dates, and
more frequent reporting requirements on subrecipients. However, the
recipient is required to meet the reporting requirements imposed by
DOL.
(2) If a State intends to impose different reporting requirements,
it must describe those reporting requirements in its State WIA plan.
(c) Financial reports. (1) Each grant recipient must submit
financial reports to DOL.
(2) Reports must include any income or profits earned, including
such income or profits earned by subrecipients, and any costs incurred
(such as stand-in costs) that are otherwise allowable except for
funding limitations. (WIA sec. 185(f)(2))
(3) Reported expenditures and program income, including any profits
earned, must be on the accrual basis of accounting and cumulative by
fiscal year of appropriation. If the recipient's accounting records are
not normally kept on the accrual basis of accounting, the recipient
must develop accrual information through an analysis of the
documentation on hand.
(d) Due date. Financial reports and participant data reports are
due no later than 45 days after the end of each quarter unless
otherwise specified in reporting instructions. A final financial report
is required 90 days after the expiration of a funding period or the
termination of grant support.
(e) Annual Performance Progress Report. An annual performance
progress report for each of the three programs under title I, subpart B
is required by WIA section 136(d).
(1) A State failing to submit any of these annual performance
progress reports within 45 days of the due date may have its grant (for
that program or all title I, subpart B programs) for the succeeding
year reduced by as much as five percent, as provided by WIA section
136(g)(1)(B).
(2) States submitting annual performance progress reports that
cannot be validated or verified as accurately counting and reporting
activities in accordance with the reporting instructions, may be
treated as failing to submit annual reports, and be subject to
sanction. Sanctions related to State performance or failure to submit
these reports timely cannot result in a total grant reduction of more
than five percent. Any sanction would be in addition to having to repay
the amount of any incentive funds granted based on the invalid report.
Subpart D--Oversight and Monitoring
Sec. 667.400 Who is responsible for oversight and monitoring of WIA
title I grants?
(a) The Secretary is authorized to monitor all recipients and
subrecipients
[[Page 18731]]
of all grants awarded and funds expended under WIA title I to determine
compliance with the Act and these regulations, and may investigate any
matter deemed necessary to determine such compliance. Federal oversight
will be conducted primarily at the recipient level.
(b) In each fiscal year, the Secretary will also conduct in-depth
reviews in several States, including financial and performance audits,
to assure that funds are spent in accordance with the Act. Priority for
such in-depth reviews will be given to States not meeting annual
adjusted levels of performance.
(c)(1) Each recipient and subrecipient must continuously monitor
grant-supported activities in accordance with the uniform
administrative requirements at 29 CFR parts 95 and 97, as applicable,
including the applicable cost principles indicated at 29 CFR 97.22(b)
or 29 CFR 95.27, for all entities receiving WIA title I funds. For
governmental units, the applicable requirements are at 29 CFR part 97.
For non-profit organizations, the applicable requirements are at 29 CFR
part 95.
(2) In the case of grants under WIA secs. 127 and 132, the Governor
must develop a State monitoring system that meets the requirements of
Sec. 667.410(b) of this subpart. The Governor must monitor Local Boards
annually for compliance with applicable laws and regulations in
accordance with the State monitoring system. Monitoring must include an
annual review of each local area's compliance with the uniform
administrative requirements.
Sec. 667.410 What are the oversight roles and responsibilities of
recipients and subrecipients?
(a) Roles and responsibilities for all recipients and subrecipients
of funds under WIA title I in general. Each recipient and subrecipient
must conduct regular oversight and monitoring of its WIA activities and
those of its subrecipients and contractors in order to:
(1) Determine that expenditures have been made against the cost
categories and within the cost limitations specified in the Act and
these regulations;
(2) Determine whether or not there is compliance with other
provisions of the Act and these regulations and other applicable laws
and regulations; and
(3) Provide technical assistance as necessary and appropriate.
(b) State roles and responsibilities for grants under WIA sections
127 and 132.
(1) The Governor is responsible for the development of the State
monitoring system. The Governor must be able to demonstrate to the
Department, through a monitoring plan or otherwise, that the State
monitoring system meets the requirements of paragraph (b)(2) of this
section.
(2) The State monitoring system must:
(i) Provide for annual on-site monitoring reviews of local areas'
compliance with DOL uniform administrative requirements, as required by
WIA section 184(a)(4);
(ii) Ensure that established policies to achieve program quality
and outcomes meet the objectives of the Act and these regulations,
including the provision of services by One-Stop Centers, eligible
providers of training services, and eligible providers of youth
activities;
(iii) Enable the Governor to determine if subrecipients and
contractors have demonstrated substantial compliance with WIA
requirements; and
(iv) Enable the Governor to determine whether a local plan will be
disapproved for failure to make acceptable progress in addressing
deficiencies, as required in WIA sec. 118(d)(1).
(3) The State must conduct an annual on-site monitoring review of
each local area's compliance with DOL uniform administrative
requirements, including the appropriate administrative requirements for
subrecipients and the applicable cost principles indicated at
Sec. 667.200 for all entities receiving WIA title I funds.
(4) The Governor must require that prompt corrective action be
taken if any substantial violation of standards identified in
paragraphs (b)(2) or (3) of this section is found. (WIA sec.
184(a)(5).)
(5) The Governor must impose the sanctions provided in WIA sections
184(b) and (c) in the event of a subrecipients's failure to take
required corrective action required under paragraph (b)(4) of this
section.
(6) The Governor may issue additional requirements and instructions
to subrecipients on monitoring activities.
(7) Governor must certify to the Secretary every two years that:
(i) The State has implemented uniform administrative requirements;
(ii) The State has monitored local areas to ensure compliance with
uniform administrative requirements; and
(iii) The State has taken appropriate corrective action to secure
such compliance. (WIA sec. 184(a)(6)(A), (B), and (C).)
Subpart E--Resolution of Findings From Monitoring and Oversight
Reviews
Sec. 667.500 What procedures apply to the resolution of findings
arising from audits, investigations, monitoring and oversight reviews?
(a) Resolution of subrecipient-level findings. (1) The Governor is
responsible for resolving findings that arise from the State's
monitoring reviews, investigations and audits (including OMB Circular
A-133 audits) of subrecipients.
(2) A State must utilize the audit resolution, debt collection and
appeal procedures that it uses for other Federal grant programs.
(3) If a State does not have such procedures, it must prescribe
standards and procedures to be used for this grant program.
(b) Resolution of State and other direct recipient level findings.
(1) The Secretary is responsible for resolving findings that arise from
Federal audits, monitoring reviews, investigations, incident reports,
and recipient level OMB Circular A-133 audits.
(2) The Secretary uses the DOL audit resolution process, consistent
with the Single Audit Act of 1996 and OMB Circular A-133, and Grant
Officer Resolution provisions of Sec. 667.510 of this subpart, as
appropriate.
(3) A final determination issued by a Grant Officer under this
process may be appealed to the DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges
under the procedures at Sec. 667.800 of this part.
(c) Resolution of nondiscrimination findings. Findings arising from
investigations or reviews conducted under nondiscrimination laws will
be resolved in accordance with WIA section 188 and the Department of
Labor nondiscrimination regulations implementing WIA section 188.
Sec. 667.505 How does the Department resolve investigative and
monitoring findings?
(a) As a result of an investigation, on-site visit or other
monitoring, the Department notifies the recipient of the findings of
the investigation and gives the recipient a period of time (not more
than 60 days) to comment and to take appropriate corrective actions.
(b) The Grant Officer reviews the complete file of the
investigation or monitoring report and the recipient's actions under
paragraph (a) of this section. The Grant Officer's review takes into
account the sanction provisions of WIA sections 184(b) and (c). If the
Grant Officer agrees with the recipient's handling of the situation,
the Grant
[[Page 18732]]
Officer so notifies the recipient. This notification constitutes final
agency action.
(c) If the Grant Officer disagrees with the recipient's handling of
the matter, the Grant Officer proceeds under Sec. 667.510 of this
subpart.
Sec. 667.510 What is the Grant Officer resolution process?
(a) General. When the Grant Officer is dissatisfied with the
State's disposition of an audit or other resolution of violations
(including those arising out of incident reports or compliance
reviews), or with the recipient's response to findings resulting from
investigations or monitoring report, the initial and final
determination process, set forth in this section, is used to resolve
the matter.
(b) Initial determination. The Grant Officer makes an initial
determination on the findings for both those matters where there is
agreement and those where there is disagreement with the recipient's
resolution, including the allowability of questioned costs or
activities. This initial determination is based upon the requirements
of the Act and regulations, and the terms and conditions of the grants,
contracts, or other agreements under the Act.
(c) Informal resolution. Except in an emergency situation, when the
Secretary invokes the authority described in WIA section 184(e), the
Grant Officer may not revoke a recipient's grant in whole or in part,
nor institute corrective actions or sanctions, without first providing
the recipient with an opportunity to present documentation or arguments
to resolve informally those matters in controversy contained in the
initial determination. The initial determination must provide for an
informal resolution period of at least 60 days from issuance of the
initial determination. If the matters are resolved informally, the
Grant Officer must issue a final determination under paragraph (d) of
this section which notifies the parties in writing of the nature of the
resolution and may close the file.
(d) Grant Officer's final determination. (1) If the matter is not
fully resolved informally, the Grant Officer provides each party with a
written final determination by certified mail, return receipt
requested. For audits of recipient-level entities and other recipients
which receive WIA funds directly from DOL, ordinarily, the final
determination is issued not later than 180 days from the date that the
Office of Inspector General (OIG) issues the final approved audit
report to the Employment and Training Administration. For audits of
subrecipients conducted by the OIG, ordinarily the final determination
is issued not later than 360 days from the date the OIG issues the
final approved audit report to ETA.
(2) A final determination under this paragraph (d) must:
(i) Indicate that efforts to informally resolve matters contained
in the initial determination have been unsuccessful;
(ii) List those matters upon which the parties continue to
disagree;
(iii) List any modifications to the factual findings and
conclusions set forth in the initial determination and the rationale
for such modifications;
(iv) Establish a debt, if appropriate;
(v) Require corrective action, when needed;
(vi) Determine liability, method of restitution of funds and
sanctions; and
(vii) Offer an opportunity for a hearing in accordance with
Sec. 667.800 of this part.
(3) Unless a hearing is requested, a final determination under this
paragraph (d) is final agency action and is not subject to further
review.
(e) Nothing in this subpart precludes the Grant Officer from
issuing an initial determination and/or final determination directly to
a subrecipient, in accordance with section 184(d)(3) of the Act. In
such a case, the Grant Officer will inform the recipient of this
action.
Subpart F--Grievance Procedures, Complaints, and State Appeals
Processes
Sec. 667.600 What local area, State and direct recipient grievance
procedures must be established?
(a) Each local area, State and direct recipient of funds under
title I of WIA, except for Job Corps, must establish and maintain a
procedure for grievances and complaints according to the requirements
of this section. The grievance procedure requirements applicable to Job
Corps are set forth at 20 CFR 670.990.
(b) Local area procedures must provide:
(1) A process for dealing with grievances and complaints from
participants and other interested parties affected by the local
Workforce Investment System, including one-stop partners and service
providers;
(2) An opportunity for an informal resolution and a hearing to be
completed within 60 days of the filing of the grievance or complaint;
(3) A process which allows an individual alleging a labor standards
violation to submit the grievance to a binding arbitration procedure,
if a collective bargaining agreement covering the parties to the
grievance so provides; and
(4) An opportunity for a local level appeal to a State entity when:
(i) No decision is reached within 60 days; or
(ii) Either party is dissatisfied with the local hearing decision.
(c) State procedures must provide:
(1) A process for dealing with grievances and complaints from
participants and other interested parties affected by the Statewide
Workforce Investment programs;
(2) A process for resolving appeals made under paragraph (b)(4) of
this section;
(3) A process for remanding grievances and complaints related to
the local Workforce Investment Act programs to the local area grievance
process; and
(4) An opportunity for an informal resolution and a hearing to be
completed within 60 days of the filing of the grievance or complaint;
and
(d) Procedures of direct recipients must provide:
(1) A process for dealing with grievance and complaints from
participants and other interested parties affected by the recipient's
Workforce Investment Act programs; and
(2) An opportunity for an informal resolution and a hearing to be
completed within 60 days of the filing of the grievance or complaint.
(e) The remedies that may be imposed under local, State and direct
recipient grievance procedures are enumerated at WIA section 181(c)(3).
(f)(1) Under WIA section 188(a), complaints of discrimination from
participants and other interested parties must be handled in accordance
with WIA section 188(b), and the Department of Labor nondiscrimination
regulations implementing that section.
(2) Questions about or complaints alleging a violation of the
nondiscrimination provisions of WIA section 188 may be directed or
mailed to the Director, Civil Rights Center, U.S. Department of Labor,
Room N4123, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20210, for
processing.
(g) Nothing in this subpart precludes a grievant or complainant
from pursuing a remedy authorized under another Federal, State or local
law.
Sec. 667.610 What processes does the Secretary use to review State and
local grievances and complaints?
(a) The Secretary investigates allegations arising through the
grievance procedures described in Sec. 667.600 when:
(1) A decision relating to a grievance or complaint under
Sec. 667.600(c) has not been reached within 60 days of receipt
[[Page 18733]]
of the grievance or complaint or within 60 days of receipt of the
request for appeal of a local level grievance and either party appeals
to the Secretary; or
(2) A decision relating to a grievance or complaint under
Sec. 667.600(c) has been reached and the party to which such decision
is adverse appeals to the Secretary.
(b) The Secretary must make a final decision on an appeal under
paragraph (a) of this section no later than 120 days after receiving
such appeal.
(c) Appeals made under to paragraph (a)(2) of this section must be
filed within 60 days of the receipt of the decision being appealed.
Appeals made under to paragraph (a)(1) of this section must be filed
within 120 days of the filing of the grievance with the State, or the
filing of the appeal of a local grievance with the State. All appeals
must be submitted by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the
Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC 20210, Attention:
ASET. A copy of the appeal must be simultaneously provided to the
appropriate ETA Regional Administrator and the opposing party.
(d) Except for complaints arising under WIA section 184(f),
grievances or complaints made directly to the Secretary will be
referred to the appropriate State or local area for resolution in
accordance with this section, unless the Secretary notifies the parties
that the Department will investigate the grievance under the procedures
at Sec. 667.505.
Sec. 667.630 How are complaints and reports of criminal fraud and
abuse addressed under WIA?
Information and complaints involving criminal fraud, waste, abuse
or other criminal activity must be reported immediately through the
Department's Incident Reporting System to the DOL Office of Inspector
General, Office of Investigations, Room S5514, 200 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20210, or to the corresponding Regional Inspector
General for Investigations, with a copy simultaneously provided to the
Employment and Training Administration. The Hotline number is 1-800-
347-3756. Complaints of a non-criminal nature are handled under the
procedures set forth in Sec. 667.505 of this part or through the
Department's Incident Reporting System.
Sec. 667.640 What additional appeal processes or systems must a State
have for the WIA program?
(a) Non-designation of local areas. (1) The State must establish,
and include in its State Plan, due process procedures which provide
expeditious appeal to the State Board for a unit or combination of
units of general local government or a rural concentrated employment
program grant recipient (as described at WIA section 116(a)(2)(B)) that
requests, but is not granted, automatic or temporary and subsequent
designation as a local workforce investment area under WIA section
116(a)(2) or 116(a)(3).
(2) These procedures must provide an opportunity for a hearing and
prescribe appropriate time limits to ensure prompt resolution of the
appeal.
(3) If the appeal to the State Board does not result in
designation, the appellant may request review by the Secretary under
Sec. 667.645.
(4) If the Secretary determines that the appellant was not accorded
procedural rights under the appeal process established in paragraph
(a)(1) of this section, or that the area meets the requirements for
designation at WIA section 116(a)(2) or 116(a)(3), the Secretary may
require that the area be designated as a workforce investment area.
(b) Denial or termination of eligibility as a training provider.
(1) A State must establish procedures which allow providers of training
services the opportunity to appeal:
(i) Denial of eligibility by a Local Board or the designated State
agency under WIA section 122(b), (c) or (e);
(ii) Termination of eligibility or other action by a Local Board or
State agency under section 122(f); or
(iii) Denial of eligibility as a provider of on-the-job training
(OJT) or customized training by a One-Stop operator under WIA section
122(h).
(2) Such procedures must provide an opportunity for a hearing and
prescribe appropriate time limits to ensure prompt resolution of the
appeal.
(3) A decision under this State appeal process may not be appealed
to the Secretary.
(c) Testing and sanctioning for use of controlled substances. (1) A
State must establish due process procedures which provide expeditious
appeal for:
(i) WIA participants subject to testing for use of controlled
substances, imposed under a State policy established under WIA section
181(f); and
(ii) WIA participants who are sanctioned after testing positive for
the use of controlled substances, under the policy described in
paragraph (c)(i) of this section.
(2) A decision under this State appeal process may not be appealed
to the Secretary.
Sec. 667.645 What procedures apply to the appeals of non-designation
of local areas?
(a) A unit or combination of units of general local government or
rural concentrated employment program grant recipient (as described at
WIA section 116(a)(2)(B)) whose appeal of the denial of a request for
automatic or temporary and subsequent designation as a local workforce
investment area to the State Board has not resulted in designation may
appeal the denial of local area designation to the Secretary.
(b) Appeals made under to paragraph (a) of this section must be
filed no later than 30 days after receipt of written notification of
the denial from the State Board, and must be submitted by certified
mail, return receipt requested, to the Secretary, U.S. Department of
Labor, Washington, DC 20210, Attention: ASET. A copy of the appeal must
be simultaneously provided to the State Board.
(c) The appellant must establish that it was not accorded
procedural rights under the appeal process set forth in the State Plan,
or establish that it meets the requirements for designation in WIA
sections 116(a)(2) or (a)(3). The Secretary may consider any comments
submitted in response by the State Board.
(d) If the Secretary determines that the appellant has met its
burden of establishing that it was not accorded procedural rights under
the appeal process set forth in the State Plan, or that it meets the
requirements for designation in WIA sections 116(a)(2) or (a)(3), the
Secretary may require that the area be designated as a local workforce
investment area.
(e) The Secretary must issue a written decision to the Governor and
the appellant.
Sec. 667.650 What procedures apply to the appeals of the Governor's
imposition of sanctions for substantial violations or performance
failures by a local area?
(a) A local area which has been found in substantial violation of
WIA title I, and has received notice from the Governor that either all
or part of the local plan will be revoked or that a reorganization will
occur, may appeal such sanctions to the Secretary under WIA section
184(b). The actions do not become effective until:
(1) The time for appeal has expired; or
(2) The Secretary has issued a decision.
(b) A local area which has failed to meet local performance
measures for two consecutive years, and has received the Governor's
notice of intent to impose a reorganization plan, may
[[Page 18734]]
appeal such sanctions to the Secretary under WIA section 136(h)(1)(B).
(c) Appeals made under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section must be
filed no later than 30 days after receipt of written notification of
the revoked plan or imposed reorganization, and must be submitted by
certified mail, return receipt requested, to the Secretary, U.S.
Department of Labor, Washington, DC 20210, Attention: ASET. A copy of
the appeal must be simultaneously provided to the Governor.
(d) The Secretary may consider any comments submitted in response
by the Governor.
(e) The Secretary will notify the Governor and the appellant in
writing of the Secretary's decision under paragraph (a) of this section
within 45 days after receipt of the appeal. The Secretary will notify
the Governor and the appellant in writing of the Secretary's decision
under paragraph (b) of this section within 30 days after receipt of the
appeal.
Subpart G--Sanctions, Corrective Actions, and Waiver of Liability
Sec. 667.700 What procedure does the Department utilize to impose
sanctions and corrective actions on recipients and subrecipients of WIA
grant funds?
(a) Except for actions under WIA section 188(a) (relating to
nondiscrimination requirements), the Grant Officer uses the initial and
final determination procedures outlined in Sec. 667.510 of this part to
impose a sanction or corrective action.
(b) To impose a sanction or corrective action regarding a violation
of WIA section 188(a), the Department will utilize the procedures of
WIA section 188(b) and the Department of Labor nondiscrimination
regulations implementing that section.
(c) To impose a sanction or corrective action for noncompliance
with the uniform administrative requirements set forth at section
184(a)(3) of WIA, and Sec. 667.200(a) of this part, when the Secretary
determines that the Governor has not taken corrective action to remedy
the violation required by WIA section 184(a)(5), the Grant Officer,
under the authority of WIA section 184(a)(7), may impose any of the
corrective actions set forth at WIA section 184(b)(1). In such
situations, the Secretary may immediately suspend or terminate
financial assistance in accordance with WIA section 184(e).
(d) The Grant Officer may also impose a sanction directly against a
subrecipient, as authorized in section 184(d)(3) of the Act. In such a
case, the Grant Officer will inform the recipient of the action.
Sec. 667.705 Who is responsible for funds provided under title I of
WIA?
(a) The recipient is responsible for all funds under its grant(s).
(b) The political jurisdiction(s) of the chief elected official(s)
in a local workforce investment area is liable for any misuse of the
WIA grant funds allocated to the local area under WIA sections 128 and
133, unless the chief elected official(s) reaches an agreement with the
Governor to bear such liability.
(c) When a local workforce area is composed of more than one unit
of general local government, the joint liability of the individual
jurisdictions must be specified in a written agreement between the
chief elected officials.
Sec. 667.710 What actions are required to address the failure of a
local area to comply with the applicable uniform administrative
provisions?
(a) If, as part of the annual on-site monitoring of local areas,
the Governor determines that a local area is not in compliance with the
uniform administrative requirements found at 29 CFR part 95 or part 97,
as appropriate, the Governor must:
(1) Require corrective action to secure prompt compliance; and
(2) Impose the sanctions provided for at section 184(b) if the
Governor finds that the local area has failed to take timely corrective
action.
(b) An action by the recipient to impose a sanction against a local
area, in accordance with this section, may be appealed to the Secretary
in accordance with Sec. 667.650, and will not become effective until:
(1) The time for appeal has expired; or
(2) The Secretary has issued a decision.
(c) If the Secretary finds that the Governor has failed to promptly
take the actions required upon a determination under paragraph (a) of
this section that a local area is not in compliance with the uniform
administrative requirements, the Secretary must take such actions
against the State recipient or the local area, as appropriate.
Sec. 667.720 How does the Department handle a recipient's request for
waiver of liability under WIA section 184(d)(2)?
(a) A recipient may request a waiver of liability, as described in
WIA section 184(d)(2), and a Grant Officer may approve such a waiver
under WIA section 184(d)(3).
(b)(1) When the debt for which a waiver of liability is desired was
established in a non-Federal resolution proceeding, the resolution
report must accompany the waiver request.
(2) When the waiver request is made during the ETA Grant Officer
resolution process, the request must be made during the informal
resolution period described in Sec. 667.510(c) of this part.
(c) A waiver of the recipient's liability shall be considered by
the Grant Officer only when:
(1) The misexpenditure of WIA funds occurred at a subrecipient's
level;
(2) The misexpenditure was not due to willful disregard of the
requirements of title I of the Act, gross negligence, failure to
observe accepted standards of administration, or did not constitute
fraud;
(3) If fraud did exist, it was perpetrated against the recipient/
subrecipients; and
(i) The recipient/subrecipients discovered, investigated, reported,
and cooperated in any prosecution of the perpetrator of the fraud; and
(ii) After aggressive debt collection action, it has been
documented that further attempts at debt collection from the
perpetrator of the fraud would be inappropriate or futile;
(4) The recipient has issued a final determination which disallows
the misexpenditure, the recipient's appeal process has been exhausted,
and a debt has been established; and
(5) The recipient requests such a waiver and provides documentation
to demonstrate that it has substantially complied with the requirements
of section 184(d)(2) of the Act, and this section.
(d) The recipient will not be released from liability for misspent
funds under the determination required by section 184(d) of the Act
unless the Grant Officer determines that further collection action,
either by the recipient or subrecipients, would be inappropriate or
would prove futile.
Sec. 667.730 What is the procedure to handle a recipient's request for
advance approval of contemplated corrective actions?
(a) The recipient may request advance approval from the Grant
Officer for contemplated corrective actions, including debt collection
actions, which the recipient plans to initiate or to forego. The
recipient's request must include a description and an assessment of all
actions taken by the subrecipients to collect the misspent funds.
(b) Based on the recipient's request, the Grant Officer may
determine that the recipient may forego certain collection actions
against a subrecipient when:
(1) The subrecipient meets the criteria set forth in section
184(d)(2) of the Act;
(2) The misexpenditure of funds:
(i) Was not made by that subrecipient but by an entity that
received WIA funds from that subrecipient;
[[Page 18735]]
(ii) Was not a violation of section 184(d)(1) of the Act, and did
not constitute fraud; or
(iii) If fraud did exist,
(A) It was perpetrated against the subrecipient; and:
(B) The subrecipient discovered, investigated, reported, and
cooperated in any prosecution of the perpetrator of the fraud; and
(C) After aggressive debt collection action, it has been documented
that further attempts at debt collection from the perpetrator of the
fraud would be inappropriate or futile;
(3) A final determination which disallows the misexpenditure and
establishes a debt has been issued at the appropriate level;
(4) Final action within the recipient's appeal system has been
completed; and
(5) Further debt collection action by that subrecipient or the
recipient would be either inappropriate or futile.
Sec. 667.740 What procedure must be used for administering the offset/
deduction provisions at WIA section 184(c)?
(a)(1) For recipient level misexpenditures, the Secretary may
determine that a debt, or a portion thereof, may be offset against
amounts that are allotted to the recipient. Recipients must submit a
written request for an offset to the Grant Officer. Generally, the
Secretary will apply the offset against amounts that are available at
the recipient level for administrative costs.
(2) The Grant Officer may approve an offset request, under
paragraph (b)(1) of this section, if the misexpenditures were not due
to willful disregard of the requirements of the Act and regulations,
gross negligence, failure to observe accepted standards of
administration or a pattern of misexpenditure.
(b) For subrecipient level misexpenditures that were not due to
willful disregard of the requirements of the Act and regulations, gross
negligence, failure to observe accepted standards of administration or
a pattern of misexpenditure, if the Secretary has required the State to
repay such amount the State may deduct an amount equal to the
misexpenditure from its subsequent year's allocations to the local area
from funds available for the administrative costs of the local programs
involved.
(c) If offset is granted, the debt will not be fully satisfied
until the Grant Officer reduces amounts allotted to the State by the
amount of the misexpenditure.
(d) A State may not make a deduction under paragraph (b)(2) of this
section until the State has taken appropriate corrective action to
ensure full compliance within the local area with regard to appropriate
expenditure of WIA funds.
Subpart H--Administrative Adjudication and Judicial Review
Sec. 667.800 What actions of the Department may be appealed to the
Office of Administrative Law Judges?
(a) An applicant for financial assistance under title I of WIA
which is dissatisfied because the Secretary has issued a determination
not to award financial assistance, in whole or in part, to such
applicant; or a recipient, subrecipient, or a vendor against which the
Grant Officer has directly imposed a sanction or corrective action,
including a sanction against a State under 20 CFR part 666, may appeal
to the U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Administrative Law Judges
(OALJ) within 21 days of receipt of the final determination.
(b) Failure to request a hearing within 21 days of receipt of the
final determination will constitute a waiver of the right to a hearing.
(c) A request for a hearing under this subpart must state
specifically those issues in the final determination upon which review
is requested. Those provisions of the final determination not specified
for review, or the entire final determination when no hearing has been
requested within the 21 days, are considered resolved and not subject
to further review. Only alleged violations of the Act, its regulations,
grant or other agreement under the Act fairly raised in the
determination, and the request for hearing are subject to review.
(d) A request for a hearing must be transmitted by certified mail,
return receipt requested, to the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S.
Department of Labor, Suite 400, 800 K Street, NW, Washington, DC 20001,
with one copy to the Departmental official who issued the
determination.
(e) The procedures set forth in this subpart apply in the case of a
complainant who has not had a dispute adjudicated under the alternative
dispute resolution process set forth in Sec. 667.840 of this part
within the 60 days, except that the request for hearing before the OALJ
must be filed within 15 days of the conclusion of the 60-day period. In
addition to including the final determination upon which review is
requested, the complainant must include a copy of any Stipulation of
Facts and a brief summary of proceedings.
Sec. 667.810 What rules of procedure apply to hearings conducted under
this subpart?
(a) Rules of practice and procedure. The rules of practice and
procedure promulgated by the OALJ at subpart A of 29 CFR part 18,
govern the conduct of hearings under this subpart. However, a request
for hearing under this subpart is not considered a complaint to which
the filing of an answer by DOL or a DOL agency or official is required.
Technical Rules of evidence will not apply to hearings conducted
pursuant to this part. However, Rules or principles designed to assure
production of the most credible evidence available and to subject
testimony to cross-examination will apply.
(b) Prehearing procedures. In all cases, the Administrative Law
Judge (ALJ) should encourage the use of prehearing procedures to
simplify and clarify facts and issues.
(c) Subpoenas. Subpoenas necessary to secure the attendance of
witnesses and the production of documents or other items at hearings
must be obtained from the ALJ and must be issued under the authority
contained in section 183(c) of the Act, incorporating 15 U.S.C. 49.
(d) Timely submission of evidence. The ALJ must not permit the
introduction at the hearing of any documentation if it has not been
made available for review by the other parties to the proceeding either
at the time ordered for any prehearing conference, or, in the absence
of such an order, at least 3 weeks prior to the hearing date.
(e) Burden of production. The Grant Officer has the burden of
production to support her or his decision. To this end, the Grant
Officer prepares and files an administrative file in support of the
decision which must be made part of the record. Thereafter, the party
or parties seeking to overturn the Grant Officer's decision has the
burden of persuasion.
Sec. 667.820 What authority will the Administrative Law Judge have in
ordering relief as an outcome of an administrative hearing?
In ordering relief, the ALJ has the full authority of the Secretary
under the Act.
Sec. 667.825 What special rules apply to reviews of MSFW and WIA INA
grant selections?
(a) An applicant whose application for funding as a WIA INA grantee
under 20 CFR part 668 or as an MSFW grantee under 20 CFR part 669 is
denied in whole or in part by the Department may request an
administrative review under Sec. 667.800(a) with respect to whether
there is a basis in the record to support the Department's decision.
This appeal
[[Page 18736]]
will not in any way interfere with the Department's designation and
funding of another organization to serve the area in question during
the appeal period. The available remedy in such an appeal is the right
to be designated in the future as the WIA INA or MSFW grantee for the
remainder of the current grant cycle. Neither retroactive nor
immediately effective selection status may be awarded as relief in a
non-selection appeal under this section. The appellant may not be
awarded a grant nor given any kind of preference beyond the current two
year-grant period.
(b) If the ALJ rules that the organization should have been
selected and the organization continues to meet the requirements of 20
CFR part 668 or part 669, the Department will select and fund the
organization within 90 days of the ALJ's decision unless the end of the
90-day period is within six (6) months of the end of the funding
period. An applicant so selected is not entitled to the full grant
amount, but will only receive the funds remaining in the grant that
have not been expended by the current grantee through its operation of
the grant and its subsequent closeout.
(c) Any organization selected and/or funded as a WIA INA or MSFW
grantee is subject to being removed as grantee in the event an ALJ
decision so orders. The Grant Officer provides instructions on
transition and close-out to a grantee which is removed. All parties
must agree to the provisions of this paragraph as a condition for WIA
INA or MSFW funding.
Sec. 667.830 When will the Administrative Law Judge issue a decision?
(a) The ALJ should render a written decision not later than 90 days
after the closing of the record.
(b) The decision of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) constitutes
final agency action unless, within 20 days of the decision, a party
dissatisfied with the ALJ's decision has filed a petition for review
with the Administrative Review Board (ARB) (established under
Secretary's Order No. 2-96, specifically identifying the procedure,
fact, law or policy to which exception is taken. Any exception not
specifically urged is deemed to have been waived. A copy of the
petition for review must be sent to the opposing party at that time.
Thereafter, the decision of the ALJ constitutes final agency action
unless the ARB, within 30 days of the filing of the petition for
review, notifies the parties that the case has been accepted for
review. Any case accepted by the ARB must be decided within 120 days of
acceptance. If not so decided, the decision of the ALJ constitutes
final agency action.
Sec. 667.840 Is there an alternative dispute resolution process that
may be used in place of an OALJ hearing?
(a) Parties to a complaint which has been filed according to the
requirements of Sec. 667.800 of this part may choose to waive their
rights to an administrative hearing before the OALJ. Instead, they may
choose to transfer the settlement of their dispute to an individual
acceptable to all parties who will conduct an informal review of the
stipulated facts and render a decision in accordance with applicable
law. A written decision must be issued within 60 days after submission
of the matter for informal review.
(b) The waiver of the right to request a hearing before the OALJ
will automatically be revoked if a settlement has not been reached or a
decision has not been issued within the 60 days provided in paragraph
(a) of this section.
(c) The decision rendered under this informal review process will
be treated as a final decision of an Administrative Law Judge under
section 186(b) of the Act.
Sec. 667.850 Is there judicial review of a final order of the
Secretary issued under WIA sec. 186 of the Act?
(a) Any party to a proceeding which resulted in a final order of
the Secretary under section 186 of the Act may obtain a review in the
United States Court of Appeals having jurisdiction over the applicant
or recipient of funds involved, by filing a review petition within 30
days of the issuance of the Secretary's final order.
(b) The court has jurisdiction to make and enter a decree
affirming, modifying, or setting aside the order of the Secretary, in
whole or in part.
(c) No objection to the Secretary's order may be considered by the
court unless the objection was specifically urged, in a timely manner,
before the Secretary. The review is limited to questions of law, and
the findings of fact of the Secretary are conclusive if supported by
substantial evidence.
(d) The judgment of the court is final, subject to certiorari
review by the United States Supreme Court.
Sec. 667.860 Are there other authorities for the pursuit of remedies
outside of the Act?
Nothing contained in this subpart prejudices the separate exercise
of other legal rights in pursuit of remedies and sanctions available
outside the Act.
Subpart I--Transition
Sec. 667.900 What special rules apply during the JTPA/WIA transition?
(a)(1) To facilitate planning for the implementation of WIA, a
Governor may reserve an amount equal to no more than 2 percent of the
total amount of JTPA formula funds allotted to the State for PY's 1998
and 1999 for expenditure on transition planning activities. The funds
may be from any one or more of the JTPA titles and subparts, that is,
funds do not have to be drawn proportionately from all titles and
subparts. The Governor must report the expenditure of these funds for
transition planning separately in accordance with instructions issued
by the Secretary, but is not required to be allocated to the various
titles and subparts;
(2) These reserved transition funds may be excluded from any
calculation of compliance with JTPA cost limitations.
(b) Not less than 50 percent of the funds reserved by the Governor
in paragraph (a) of this section must be made available to local
entities.
(c) The Secretary will issue such other transition guidance as
necessary and appropriate.
PART 668--INDIAN AND NATIVE AMERICAN PROGRAMS UNDER TITLE I OF THE
WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT
Subpart A--Purposes and Policies
Sec.
668.100 What is the purpose of the programs established to serve
Native American peoples (INA programs) under section 166 of the
Workforce Investment Act (WIA)?
668.120 How must INA programs be administered?
668.130 What obligation does the Department have to consult with
the INA grantee community in developing rules, regulations, and
standards of accountability for INA programs?
668.140 How do the WIA regulations apply to the INA program?
668.150 What definitions apply to terms used in the regulations in
this part?
Subpart B--Service Delivery Systems Applicable to Section 166 Programs
668.200 What are the requirements for designation as an ``Indian or
Native American (INA) grantee'?
668.210 What priority for designation is given to eligible
organizations?
668.220 What is meant by the ``ability to administer funds'' for
designation purposes?
668.230 How will the Department determine an entity's ``ability to
administer funds?'
668.240 What is the process for applying for designation as an INA
grantee?
[[Page 18737]]
668.250 What happens if two or more entities apply for the same
area?
668.260 How are INA grantees designated?
668.270 What appeal rights are available to entities that are
denied designation?
668.280 Are there any other ways in which an entity may be
designated as an INA grantee?
668.290 Can an INA grantee's designation be terminated?
668.292 How does a designated entity become an INA grantee?
668.294 Does the Department have to designate an INA grantee for
every part of the country?
668.296 How are WIA funds allocated to INA grantees?
Subpart C--Services to Customers
668.300 Who is eligible to receive services under the INA program?
668.340 What are INA grantee allowable activities?
668.350 Are there any restrictions on allowable activities?
668.360 What is the role of INA grantees in the One-Stop system?
668.370 What policies govern payments to participants, including
wages, training allowances or stipends, or direct payments for
supportive services?
668.380 What will DOL do to strengthen the capacity of INA grantees
to deliver effective services?
Subpart D--Supplemental Youth Services
668.400 What is the purpose of the supplemental youth services
program?
668.410 What entities are eligible to receive supplemental youth
services funding?
668.420 What are the planning requirements for receiving
supplemental youth services funding?
668.430 What individuals are eligible to receive supplemental youth
services?
668.440 How is funding for supplemental youth services determined?
668.450 How will supplemental youth services to be provided?
668.460 Are there performance measures and standards applicable to
the supplemental youth services program?
Subpart E--Services to Communities
668.500 What services may INA grantees provide to or for employers
under section 166?
668.510 What services may INA grantees provide to the community at
large under section 166?
668.520 Must INA grantees give preference to Indian/Native American
entities in the selection of contractors or service providers?
668.530 What rules govern the issuance of contracts and/or
subgrants?
Subpart F--Accountability for Services and Expenditures
668.600 To whom is the INA grantee accountable for the provision of
services and the expenditure of INA funds?
668.610 How is this accountability documented and fulfilled?
668.620 What performance measures are in place for the INA program?
668.630 What are the requirements for preventing fraud and abuse
under section 166?
668.640 What grievance systems must a section 166 program provide?
668.650 Can INA grantees exclude eligible segments of the
population?
Subpart G--Section 166 Planning/Funding Process
668.700 What process must an INA grantee use to plan its employment
and training services ?
668.710 What planning documents must an INA grantee submit to the
Department?
668.720 What information must these planning documents contain?
668.730 When must these plans be submitted?
668.740 How will the Department review and approve such plans?
668.750 Under what circumstances can the Department or the INA
grantee modify the terms of the grantee's plan(s)?
Subpart H--Administrative Requirements
668.800 What systems must an INA grantee have in place to
administer an INA program?
668.810 What types of costs are allowable expenditures under the
INA program?
668.820 What rules apply to administrative costs under the INA
program?
668.830 How should INA program grantees classify costs?
668.840 What cost principles apply to INA funds?
668.850 What audit requirements apply to INA grants?
668.860 What cash management procedures apply to INA grant funds?
668.870 What is ``program income'' and how is it regulated in the
INA program?
Subpart I--Miscellaneous Program Provisions
668.900 Does the WIA provide regulatory and/or statutory waiver
authority?
668.910 What information is required to document a requested
waiver?
668.920 What provisions of law or regulations may not be waived?
668.930 May INA grantees combine or consolidate their employment
and training funds?
668.940 What is the role of the Native American Employment and
Training Council?
Authority: Secs. 506(c) and 166(h)(2) Pub. L. 105-220; 20 U.S.C.
9276(c); 29 U.S.C. 2911(h)(2)
Subpart A--Purposes and Policies
Sec. 668.100 What is the purpose of the programs established to serve
Native American peoples (INA programs) under sec. 166 of the Workforce
Investment Act (WIA)?
(a) The purpose of WIA INA programs is to support comprehensive
employment and training activities for Indian, Alaska Native and Native
Hawaiian individuals in order to:
(1) Develop more fully their academic, occupational, and literacy
skills;
(2) Make them more competitive in the workforce;
(3) Promote the economic and social development of Indian, Alaska
Native, and Native Hawaiian communities according to the goals and
values of such communities; and
(4) Help them achieve personal and economic self-sufficiency.
(b) The principal means of accomplishing these purposes is to
enable tribes and Native American organizations to provide employment
and training services to Native American peoples and their communities.
Services should be provided in a culturally appropriate manner,
consistent with the principles of Indian self-determination. (WIA sec.
166(a)(1).)
Sec. 668.120 How must INA programs be administered?
(a) The Department will administer INA programs to maximize the
Federal commitment to support the growth and development of Native
American people and communities as determined by representatives of
such communities.
(b) In administering these programs, the Department will observe
the Congressional declaration of policy set forth in the Indian Self-
Determination and Education Assistance Act, at 25 U.S.C. 450a, as well
as the Department of Labor's ``American Indian and Alaska Native
Policy,'' dated July 29, 1998.
(c) These regulations are not intended to abrogate the trust
responsibilities of the Federal Government to Native American bands,
tribes, or groups in any way.
(d) The Department will administer INA programs through a single
organizational unit and consistent with the requirements in section
166(h) of the Act. The Department has designated the Division of Indian
and Native American Programs (DINAP) within the Employment and Training
Administration (ETA) as this single organizational unit required by WIA
section 166(h)(1).
(e) The Department will establish and maintain administrative
procedures for the selection, administration, monitoring, and
evaluation of Native American employment and training programs
authorized under this Act. The Department will utilize staff who have a
particular competence in this field to administer these programs. (WIA
sec. 166(h).)
[[Page 18738]]
Sec. 668.130 What obligation does the Department have to consult with
the INA grantee community in developing rules, regulations, and
standards of accountability for INA programs?
The Department will consult with the Native American grantee
community as a full partner in developing policies for the INA
programs. The Department will actively seek and consider the views of
all INA grantees, and will discuss options with the grantee community
prior to establishing policies and program regulations. The primary
consultation vehicle is the Native American Employment and Training
Council. (WIA sec. 166(h)(2).)
Sec. 668.140 How do the WIA regulations apply to the INA program?
(a) The regulations found in this subpart.
(b) The general administrative requirements found in 20 CFR part
667, including the regulations concerning Complaints, Investigations
and Hearings found at 20 CFR part 667 subpart E through subpart H.
(c) The Department's regulations codifying the common rules
implementing Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circulars which
generally apply to Federal programs carried out by Indian tribal
governments and nonprofit organizations, at 29 CFR parts 95, 96, and
97, as applicable.
Sec. 668.150 What definitions apply to terms used in the regulations
in this part?
In addition to the definitions found in WIA sections 101 and 166
and 20 CFR 660.300, the following definitions apply:
DINAP means the Division of Indian and Native American Programs
within the Employment and Training Administration of the Department.
Governing Body means a body of representatives who are duly
elected, appointed by duly elected officials, or selected according to
traditional tribal means. A governing body must have the authority to
provide services to and to enter into grants on behalf of the
organization that selected or designated it.
Grant Officer means a Department of Labor official authorized to
obligate Federal funds.
Indian or Native American (INA) Grantee means an entity which is
formally designated under subpart B of this part to operate an INA
program and which has a grant agreement pursuant to 20 CFR 668.292.
NEW means the Native Employment Works Program, the tribal work
program authorized under section 412(a)(2) of the Social Security Act,
as amended by the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity
Reconciliation Act (Pub. L. 104-193).
Underemployed means an individual who is working part time but
desires full time employment, or who is working in employment not
commensurate with the individual's demonstrated level of educational
attainment.
Subpart B--Service Delivery Systems Applicable to Section 166
Programs
Sec. 668.200 What are the requirements for designation as an ``Indian
or Native American (INA) grantee''?
(a) To be designated as an INA grantee for PY 1999, an entity must
have:
(1) A legal status as a government or as an agency of a government,
as a private non-profit corporation, or a consortium which contains at
least one of these entities;
(2) The ability to administer INA program funds, as defined at
Sec. 668.220 of this subpart; and
(3) For PY 1999 only, a population within the designated geographic
service area of 1,000 or more Native American persons.
(b) For PY 2000 and beyond, an entity must have:
(1) A legal status as a government or as an agency of a government,
private non-profit corporation, or a consortium which contains at least
one of these entities;
(2) The ability to administer INA program funds, as defined at
Sec. 668.220 of this subpart; and
(3) A new (non-incumbent) entity must have a population within the
designated geographic service area which would provide funding under
the funding formula found at Sec. 668.296(b) in the amount of at least
$100,000, including any amounts received for supplemental youth
services under the funding formula at Sec. 668.440(a). Incumbent
grantees which do not meet this dollar threshold for PY 2000 and beyond
will be grandfathered in. We will make an exception for grantees
wishing to participate in the demonstration program under Pub. L. 102-
477 if all resources to be consolidated under the Pub. L. 102-477 plan
total at least $100,000.
(c) To be designated as a Native American grantee, a consortium or
its members must meet the requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) of
this section and must:
(1) Be in close proximity to one another, but they may operate in
more than one State;
(2) Have an administrative unit legally authorized to run the
program and to commit the other members to contracts, grants, and other
legally-binding agreements; and
(3) Be jointly and individually responsible for the actions and
obligations of the consortium, including debts.
(d) Entities potentially eligible for designation under paragraph
(a)(1) or (b)(1) of this section are:
(1) Federally-recognized Indian tribes;
(2) Tribal organizations, as defined in 25 U.S.C. 450b;
(3) Alaska Native-controlled organizations representing regional or
village areas, as defined in the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act;
(4) Native Hawaiian-controlled entities;
(5) State-recognized Indian tribes;
(6) Native American-controlled organizations serving Indians; and
(7) Consortia of eligible entities which meets the legal
requirements for a consortium described in paragraph (c) of this
section.
Sec. 668.210 What priority for designation is given to eligible
organizations?
(a) Federally-recognized Indian tribes, Alaska Native entities, or
consortia that include a tribe or entity will have the highest priority
for designation. To be designated, the organizations must meet the
requirements in this Subpart. These organizations will be designated
for those geographic areas over which they have legal jurisdiction.
(WIA section 166(c)(1).)
(b) If the Department decides not to designate Indian tribes or
Alaska Native entities to serve their service areas, the Department
will enter into arrangements to provide services with entities which
the tribes or Alaska Native entities involved approve.
(c) In geographic areas not served by Indian tribes or Alaska
Native entities, entities with a Native American-controlled governing
body and which are representative of the Native American community or
communities involved will have priority for designation.
Sec. 668.220 What is meant by the ``ability to administer funds'' for
designation purposes?
An organization has the ``ability to administer funds'' if it:
(a) Is in compliance with Departmental debt management procedures,
if applicable;
(b) Has not been found guilty of fraud or criminal activity which
would affect the entity's ability to safeguard Federal funds or deliver
program services;
(c) Can demonstrate that it has or can acquire the necessary
program and financial management personnel to
[[Page 18739]]
safeguard Federal funds and effectively deliver program services; and
(d) Can demonstrate that it has successfully carried out, or has
the capacity to successfully carry out activities that will strengthen
the ability of the individuals served to obtain or retain unsubsidized
employment.
Sec. 668.230 How will the Department determine an entity's ``ability
to administer funds?''
(a) Before determining which entity to designate for a particular
service area, the Department will conduct a review of the entity's
ability to administer funds.
(b) The review for an entity that has served as a grantee in either
of the two designation periods before the one under consideration, also
will consider the extent of compliance with these regulations or the
JTPA regulations at 20 CFR part 632. Evidence of the ability to
administer funds may be established by a satisfactory Federal audit
record. It may also be established by a recent record showing
substantial compliance with Federal record keeping, reporting, program
performance standards, or similar standards imposed on grantees by this
or other public sector supported programs.
(c) For other entities, the review includes the experience of the
entity's management in administering funds for services to Native
American people. This review also includes an assessment of the
relationship between the entity and the Native American community or
communities to be served.
Sec. 668.240 What is the process for applying for designation as an
INA grantee?
(a) Every entity seeking designation must submit a Notice of Intent
(NOI) which complies with the requirements of the Solicitation for
Grant Application (SGA). An SGA will be issued every two years,
covering all areas except for those for which competition is waived for
the incumbent grantee under WIA section 166(c)(2).
(b) NOI's must be submitted to the Chief of DINAP, bearing a U.S.
Postal Service postmark indicating its submission no later than October
1st of the year which precedes the first year of a new designation
cycle. For NOI's received after October 1, only a timely official U.S.
Postal Service postmark is acceptable as proof of timely submission.
Dates indicating submission by private express delivery services or
metered mail are unacceptable as proof of the timely submission of
designation documents.
(c) NOI's must include the following:
(1) Documentation of the legal status of the entity, as described
in Sec. 668.200(a)(1);
(2) A Standard Form (SF) 424--Application for Federal Assistance;
(3) A specific description, by State, county, reservation or
similar area, or service population, of the geographic area for which
the entity requests designation;
(4) A brief summary of the employment and training or human
resource development programs serving Native Americans that the entity
currently operates or has operated within the previous two-year period.
(5) A description of the planning process used by the entity,
including the involvement of the governing body and local employers.
(6) Evidence to establish an entities ability to administer funds
under Secs. 668.220-668.230.
Sec. 668.250 What happens if two or more entities apply for the same
area?
(a) Every two years, unless there has been a waiver of competition
for the area, the Department issues a Solicitation for Grant
Application (SGA) seeking applicants for INA program grants.
(b) If two or more entities apply for grants for the same service
area, or for overlapping service areas, and a waiver of competition
under WIA section 166(c)(2) is not granted to the incumbent grantee,
the following additional procedures apply:
(1) The Grant Officer will follow the regulations for priority
designation at Sec. 668.210.
(2) If no applicant is entitled to priority designation, DINAP will
inform each entity which submitted a NOI, including the incumbent
grantee, in writing, of all the competing Notices of Intent no later
than November 15 of the year the NOI's are received.
(3) Each entity will have an opportunity to describe its service
plan, and may submit additional information addressing the requirements
of Sec. 668.240(c) or such other information as the applicant
determines is appropriate. Revised Notices must be received or contain
an official U.S. Postal Service postmark, no later than January 5th.
(4) The Grant Officer selects the entity that demonstrates the
ability to produce the best outcomes for its customers.
Sec. 668.260 How are INA grantees designated?
(a) On March 1 of each designation year, the Department designates
or conditionally designates Native American grantees for the coming two
program years. The Grant Officer informs, in writing, each entity which
submitted a Notice of Intent that the entity has been:
(1) Designated;
(2) Conditionally designated;
(3) Designated for only a portion of its requested area or
population; or
(4) Denied designation.
(b) Designated Native American entities must ensure and provide
evidence to DOL that a system is in place to afford all members of the
eligible population within their service area an equitable opportunity
to receive employment and training activities and services.
Sec. 668.270 What appeal rights are available to entities that are
denied designation?
Any entity that is denied designation in whole or in part for the
area or population that it requested may appeal the denial to the
Office of the Administrative Law Judges using the procedures at 20 CFR
667.800 or the alternative dispute resolution procedures at 20 CFR
667.840. The Grant Officer will provide an entity whose request for
designation was denied, in whole or in part, with a copy of the appeal
procedures.
Sec. 668.280 Are there any other ways in which an entity may be
designated as an INA grantee?
Yes, for an area which would otherwise go unserved. The Grant
Officer may designate an entity, which has not submitted an NOI, but
which meets the qualifications for designation, to serve the particular
geographic area. Under such circumstances, DINAP will seek the views of
Native American leaders in the area involved about the decision to
designate the entity to serve that community. DINAP will inform the
Grant Officer of their views. The Grant Officer will accommodate their
views to the extent possible.
Sec. 668.290 Can an INA grantee's designation be terminated?
(a) Yes. The Grant Officer can terminate a grantee's designation
for cause, or the Secretary or another DOL official confirmed by the
Senate can terminate a grantee's designation in emergency circumstances
where termination is necessary to protect the integrity of Federal
funds or ensure the proper operation of the program. (WIA sec. 184(e).)
(b) The Grant Officer may terminate a grantee's designation for
cause only if there is a substantial or persistent violation of the
requirements in the Act or these regulations. The grantee must be
provided with written notice 60 days before termination, stating the
specific reasons why termination is proposed. The appeal procedures at
20 CFR 667.800 apply.
[[Page 18740]]
(c) The Secretary must give a grantee terminated in emergency
circumstances prompt notice of the termination and an opportunity for a
hearing within 30 days of the termination.
Sec. 668.292 How does a designated entity become an INA grantee?
A designated entity becomes a grantee on the effective date of an
executed grant agreement, signed by the authorized official of the
grantee organization and the Grant Officer. The grant agreement
includes a set of certifications and assurances that the grantee will
comply with the terms of the Act, these regulations, and other
appropriate requirements. Funds are released to the grantee upon
Departmental approval of the required planning documents, as described
in Secs. 668.710 through 668.740.
Sec. 668.294 Does the Department have to designate an INA grantee for
every part of the country?
No. Beginning with the PY 2000 grant awards, if there are no
entities meeting the requirements for designation in a particular area,
or willing to serve that area, the Department will not allocate funds
for that service area. The funds allocated to that area will be
distributed to the remaining INA grantees, or used for other program
purposes such as technical assistance and training (TAT). Remaining
funds used for technical assistance and training are in addition to,
and not subject to the limitations on, amounts reserved under
Sec. 668.296(e). Areas which are unserved by the INA program may be
restored during a subsequent designation cycle, when and if a current
grantee or other eligible entity applies for and is designated to serve
that area.
Sec. 668.296 How are WIA funds allocated to INA grantees?
(a) Except for reserved funds described in paragraph (e) of this
section, all funds available for WIA section 166(d)(2)(A)(i)
comprehensive workforce investment services program at the beginning of
a Program Year will be allocated to Native American grantees for their
designated geographic service areas.
(b) Each INA grantee will receive the sum of the funds calculated
under the following formula:
(1) One-quarter of the funds available will be allocated on the
basis of the number of unemployed Native American persons in the
grantee's designated INA service area(s) compared to all such persons
in all such areas in the United States.
(2) Three-quarters of the funds available will be allocated on the
basis of the number of Native American persons in poverty in the
grantee's designated INA service area(s) as compared to all such
persons in all such areas in the United States.
(3) The data and definitions used to implement these formulas is
provided by the U.S. Bureau of the Census.
(c) In years immediately following the use of new data in the
formula described in paragraph (b) of this section, the Department,
based upon criteria to be described in the SGA, may utilize a hold
harmless factor to reduce the disruption in grantee services which
would otherwise result from changes in funding levels. This factor will
be determined in consultation with the grantee community and the Native
American Employment and Training Council.
(d) The Department may reallocate funds from one INA grantee to
another if a grantee is unable to serve its area for any reason, such
as audit or debt problems, criminal activity, internal (political)
strife, or lack of ability or interest. Funds may also be reallocated
if a grantee has carry-in excess of 20 percent of the total funds
available to it. Carry-in amounts greater than 20 percent but less than
25 percent of total funds available may be allowed under an approved
waiver issued by DINAP.
(e) The Department may reserve up to one percent (1 percent) of the
funds appropriated under WIA section 166(d)(2)(A)(i) for any Program
Year for TAT purposes. Technical assistance will be provided in
consultation with the Native American Employment and Training Council.
Subpart C--Services to Customers
Sec. 668.300 Who is eligible to receive services under the INA
program?
(a) A person is eligible to receive services under the INA program
if that person is:
(1) An Indian, as determined by a policy of the Native American
grantee. The grantee's definition must at least include anyone who is a
member of a Federally-recognized tribe; or
(2) An Alaska Native, as defined in section 3(b) of the Alaska
Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA), 43 U.S.C. 1602(b); or
(3) A Native Hawaiian, as defined in WIA section 166(b)(3).
(b) The person must also be any one of the following:
(1) Unemployed; or
(2) Underemployed, as defined in Sec. 668.150; or
(3) A low-income individual, as defined in WIA section 101(25); or
(4) The recipient of a bona fide lay-off notice which has taken
effect in the last six months or will take effect in the following six
month period, who is unlikely to return to a previous industry or
occupation, and who is in need of retraining for either employment with
another employer or for job retention with the current employer; or
(5) An individual who is employed, but is determined by the grantee
to be in need of employment and training services to obtain or retain
employment that allows for self-sufficiency.
(c) If applicable, male applicants must also register or be
registered for the Selective Service.
(d) For purposes of determining whether a person is a low-income
individual under paragraph (b)(3) of this section, the Secretary issues
guidance for the determination of family income. (WIA sec. 189(h).)
Sec. 668.340 What are INA grantee allowable activities?
(a) The INA grantee may provide any services consistent with the
purposes of this section that are necessary to meet the needs of Native
Americans preparing to enter, reenter, or retain unsubsidized
employment. (WIA sec. 166(d)(1)(B).) Comprehensive workforce investment
activities authorized under WIA section 166(d)(2) include:
(b) Core services, which must be delivered in partnership with the
One-Stop delivery system, include:
(1) Outreach;
(2) Intake;
(3) Orientation to services available;
(4) Initial assessment of skill levels, aptitudes, abilities and
supportive service needs;
(5) Eligibility certification;
(6) Job Search and placement assistance;
(7) Career counseling;
(8) Provision of employment statistics information and local,
regional, and national Labor Market Information;
(9) Provision of information regarding filing of Unemployment
Insurance claims;
(10) Assistance in establishing eligibility for Welfare-to-Work
programs;
(11) Assistance in establishing eligibility for financial
assistance for training;
(12) Provision of information relating to supportive services;
(13) Provision of performance and cost information relating to
training providers and training services; and
(14) Follow-up services.
(c) Allowable intensive services which include:
(1) Comprehensive and specialized testing and assessment;
(2) Development of an individual employment plan;
[[Page 18741]]
(3) Group counseling;
(4) Individual counseling and career planning;
(5) Case Management for seeking training services;
(6) Short term pre-vocational services;
(7) Work experience in the public or private sector;
(8) Tryout employment;
(9) Dropout prevention activities;
(10) Supportive services; and
(11) Other services identified in the approved Two Year Plan.
(d) Allowable training services which include:
(1) Occupational skill training;
(2) On-the-job training;
(3) Programs that combine workplace training with related
instruction, which may include cooperative education programs;
(4) Training programs operated by the private sector;
(5) Skill upgrading and retraining;
(6) Entrepreneurial and small business development technical
assistance and training;
(7) Job readiness training;
(8) Adult basic education, GED attainment, literacy training, and
English language training, provided in combination with any training
services described in paragraphs (d)(1) through (8) of this section;
(9) Customized training conducted with a commitment by an employer
or group of employers to employ an individual upon successful
completion of training; and
(10) Educational and tuition assistance.
(e) Allowable activities specifically designed for youth are
identified in section 129 of the Act and include:
(1) Improving educational and skill competencies;
(2) Adult mentoring;
(3) Training opportunities;
(4) Supportive services as defined in WIA section 101(46);
(5) Incentive programs for recognition and achievement;
(6) Opportunities for leadership, development, decision-making,
citizenship and community service;
(7) Preparation for postsecondary education, academic and
occupational learning, unsubsidized employment opportunities, and other
effective connections to intermediaries with strong links to the job
market and local and regional employers;
(8) Tutoring, study skills training, and other drop-out prevention
strategies;
(9) Alternative secondary school services;
(10) Summer employment opportunities that are directly linked to
academic and occupational learning;
(11) Paid and unpaid work experiences, including internships and
job shadowing;
(12) Occupational skill training;
(13) Leadership development opportunities as defined in
Sec. 664.420;
(14) Follow-up services as defined in Sec. 664.450;
(15) Comprehensive guidance and counseling, which may include drug
and alcohol abuse counseling and referral; and
(16) Information and referral.
(f) In addition, allowable activities include job development and
employment outreach, including:
(1) Support of the Tribal Employment Rights Office (TERO) program;
(2) Negotiation with employers to encourage them to train and hire
participants;
(3) Establishment of linkages with other service providers to aid
program participants;
(4) Establishment of management training programs to support tribal
administration or enterprises; and
(5) Establishment of linkages with remedial education, such as
Adult Basic Education (ABE), basic literacy training, and English-as-a-
second-language (ESL) training programs, as necessary.
(g) Participants may be enrolled in more than one activity at a
time and may be sequentially enrolled in multiple activities.
(h) INA grantees may provide any services which may be carried out
by fund recipients under any provisions of the Act. (WIA section
166(d).)
(i) In addition, INA grantees must develop programs which
contribute to occupational development, upward mobility, development of
new careers, and opportunities for nontraditional employment. (WIA
section 195(1).)
Sec. 668.350 Are there any restrictions on allowable activities?
(a) All occupational training must be for occupations for which
there are employment opportunities in the local area or another area to
which the participant is willing to relocate. (WIA sec.
134(d)(4)(A)(iii).)
(b) INA grantees must provide OJT services consistent with the
definition provided in WIA section 101(31) and other limitations in the
Act. Individuals in OJT must:
(1) Be compensated at the same rates, including periodic increases,
as trainees or employees who are similarly situated in similar
occupations by the same employer and who have similar training,
experience, and skills; and (WIA sec. 181(a)(1).)
(2) Be provided benefits and working conditions at the same level
and to the same extent as other trainees or employees working a similar
length of time and doing the same type of work. (WIA sec. 181(b)(5).)
(c) In addition, OJT contracts under this title must not be entered
into with employers who have:
(1) Received payments under previous contracts and have exhibited a
pattern of failing to provide OJT participants with continued, long-
term employment as regular employees with wages and employment benefits
and working conditions at the same level and to the same extent as
other employees working a similar length of time and doing the same
work, or
(2) Who have violated paragraphs (b)(1) and/or (2) of this section.
(WIA 195(4).)
(d) INA grantees are prohibited from using funds to encourage the
relocation of a business as described in WIA section 181(d) and 20 CFR
667.268.
(e) INA grantees must only use funds for activities which are in
addition to those that would otherwise be available to the Native
American population in the area in the absence of such funds. (WIA
Sec. 195(2).)
(f) INA grantees must not spend funds on activities that displace
currently employed individuals, impair existing contracts for services,
or in any way affect union organizing. (WIA Sec. 181(b).)
Sec. 668.360 What is the role of INA grantees in the One-Stop system?
(a) In those local workforce investment areas where there is a INA
grantee field office, the INA grantee is a required partner in the
local One-Stop delivery system and is subject to the provisions
relating to such partners described in 20 CFR part 662. Consistent with
those provisions, a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the INA
grantee and the Local Board over the operation of the One-Stop
Center(s) in the Local Board's workforce investment area must also be
executed.
(b) At a minimum, the MOU must contain provisions related to:
(1) The services to be provided through the One-Stop Service
System;
(2) The methods for referral of individuals between the One-Stop
operator and the INA grantee which take into account the services
provided by the INA grantee and the other One-Stop partners;
(3) The exchange of information on the services available and
accessible through the One-Stop system and the INA program;
(4) As necessary to provide referrals and case management services,
the exchange of information on Native
[[Page 18742]]
American participants in the One-Stop system and the INA program;
(5) Arrangements for the funding of services provided by the One-
Stop(s), consistent with the requirement that no expenditures may be
made with INA program funds for individuals who are not eligible under
this part.
(c) The INA grantee's Two Year Plan must describe the efforts the
grantee has made to negotiate MOU's consistent with paragraph (b) of
this section, for each planning cycle during which Local Boards are
operating under the terms of WIA.
Sec. 668.370 What policies govern payments to participants, including
wages, training allowances or stipends, or direct payments for
supportive services?
(a) INA grantees may pay training allowances or stipends to
participants for their successful participation in and completion of
education or training services (except such allowance may not be
provided to participants in OJT). Allowances or stipends may not exceed
the Federal or State minimum wage, whichever is higher.
(b) INA grantees may not pay a participant in a training activity
when the person fails to participate without good cause.
(c) If a participant in a WIA-funded activity is involved in an
employer-employee relationship, including participants in OJT, that
participant must be paid wages and fringe benefits at the same rates as
trainees or employees who have similar training, experience and skills
and which are not less than the higher of the applicable Federal, State
or local minimum wage. (WIA section 181(a)(1).)
(d) In accordance with the policy described in the two-year plan,
INA grantees may pay incentive bonuses to participants who meet or
exceed individual employability or training goals established in
writing in the individual employment plan.
(e) INA grantees must comply with other restrictions listed in WIA
sections 181 through 199 which apply to all programs funded under title
I of WIA.
(f) INA grantees must comply with the provisions on labor standards
in WIA section 181(b).
Sec. 668.380 What will DOL do to strengthen the capacity of INA
grantees to deliver effective services?
The Department will provide appropriate TAT, as necessary, to INA
grantees. This TAT will assist INA grantees to improve program
performance and enhance services to the target population(s), as
resources permit. (WIA sec. 166(h)(5).)
Subpart D--Supplemental Youth Services
Sec. 668.400 What is the purpose of the supplemental youth services
program?
The purpose of this program is to provide supplemental employment
and training and related services to Native American youth on or near
Indian reservations, or in Oklahoma, Alaska, and Hawaii. (WIA sec.
166(d)(2)(A)(ii).)
Sec. 668.410 What entities are eligible to receive supplemental youth
services funding?
Eligible recipients for supplemental youth services funding are
limited to those tribal, Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian and Oklahoma
tribal grantees funded under WIA section 166(d)(2)(A)(i), or other
grantees serving those areas and/or populations specified in
Sec. 668.400, that received funding under title II-B of the Job
Training Partnership Act, or that are designated to serve an eligible
area as specified in WIA section 166(d)(2)(A)(ii).
Sec. 668.420 What are the planning requirements for receiving
supplemental youth services funding?
Beginning with PY 2000, eligible INA grantees must describe the
supplemental youth services which they intend to provide in their Two
Year Plan, (described more fully in Secs. 668.710 and 668.720 of this
part). This Plan includes the target population the grantee intends to
serve, for example, drop-outs, juvenile offenders, and/or college
students. It also includes the performance measures/standards to be
utilized to measure program progress.
Sec. 668.430 What individuals are eligible to receive supplemental
youth services?
(a) Participants in supplemental youth services activities must be
Native Americans, as determined by the INA grantee according to
Sec. 668.300(a) and must meet the definition of Eligible Youth, as
defined in WIA section 101(13);
(b)Youth participants must be low-income individuals, except that
not more than five percent (5%) who do not meet the minimum income
criteria, may be considered eligible youth if they meet one or more of
the following categories:
(1) School dropouts;
(2) Basic skills deficient as defined in WIA section 101(4);
(3) Have educational attainment that is one or more grade levels
below the grade level appropriate to their age group;
(4) Pregnant or parenting;
(5) Have disabilities, including learning disabilities;
(6) Homeless or runaway youth;
(7) Offenders; or
(8) Other eligible youth who face serious barriers to employment as
identified by the grantee in its Plan. (WIA section 129(c)(5).)
Sec. 668.440 How is funding for supplemental youth services
determined?
(a) Beginning with PY 2000, supplemental youth funding will be
allocated to eligible INA grantees on the basis of the relative number
of Native American youth between the ages of 14 and 21, inclusive, in
the grantee's designated INA service area as compared to the number of
Native American youth in other INA service areas.
(b) The data used to implement this formula is provided by the U.S.
Bureau of the Census.
(c) The hold harmless factor described in Sec. 668.296(c) also
applies to supplemental youth services funding. This factor also will
be determined in consultation with the grantee community and the Native
American Employment and Training Council.
(d) The reallocation provisions of Sec. 668.296(d) will also apply
to supplemental youth services funding.
(e) Any supplemental youth services funds not allotted to a grantee
or refused by a grantee may be used for the purposes outlined in
Sec. 668.296(e). Any such funds are in addition to, and not subject to
the limitations on, amounts reserved under Sec. 668.296(e).
Sec. 668.450 How will supplemental youth services to be provided?
(a) INA grantees may offer supplemental services to youth
throughout the school year, during the summer vacation, and/or during
other breaks during the school year at their discretion;
(b) The Department encourages INA grantees to work with Local
Educational Agencies to provide academic credit for youth activities
whenever possible;
(c) INA grantees may provide participating youth with the
activities listed in 20 CFR 668.340(e).
Sec. 668.460 Are there performance measures and standards applicable
to the supplemental youth services program?
Yes. WIA section 166(e)(5) requires that the program plan contain a
description of the performance measures to be used to assess the
performance of grantees in carrying out the activities assisted under
this section. Specific indicators of performance and levels of
performance for supplemental youth services activities will be
developed by the Department in partnership with the Native American
[[Page 18743]]
Employment and Training Council, and transmitted to INA grantees as an
administrative issuance.
Subpart E--Services to Communities
Sec. 668.500 What services may INA grantees provide to or for
employers under section 166?
(a) INA grantees may provide a variety of services to employers in
their areas. These services may include:
(1) Workforce planning which involves the recruitment of current or
potential program participants, including job restructuring services;
(2) Recruitment and assessment of potential employees, with
priority given to potential employees who are or who might become
eligible for program services;
(3) Pre-employment training;
(4) Customized training;
(5) On-the-Job training (OJT);
(6) Post-employment services, including training and support
services to encourage job retention and upgrading;
(7) Work experience for public or private sector work sites;
(8) Other innovative forms of worksite training.
(b) In addition to the services listed above, other grantee-
determined services intended to assist eligible participants to obtain
or retain employment may also be provided to or for employers approved
in the grantee's Two Year Plan.
Sec. 668.510 What services may INA grantees provide to the community
at large under section 166?
(a) INA grantees may provide services to the Native American
communities in their designated service areas by engaging in program
development and service delivery activities which:
(1) Strengthen the capacity of Native American-controlled
institutions to provide education and work-based learning services to
Native American youth and adults, whether directly or through other
Native American institutions such as tribal colleges;
(2) Increase the community's capacity to deliver supportive
services, such as child care, transportation, housing, health, and
similar services needed by clients to obtain and retain employment;
(3) Use program participants engaged in education, training, work
experience, or similar activities to further the economic and social
development of Native American communities in accordance with the goals
and values of those communities; and
(4) Engage in other community-building activities described in the
INA grantee's Two Year Plan.
(b) INA grantees should develop their Two Year Plan in conjunction
with, and in support of, strategic tribal planning and community
development goals.
Sec. 668.520 Must INA grantees give preference to Indian/Native
American entities in the selection of contractors or service providers?
Yes. INA grantees must give as much preference as possible to
Indian organizations and to Indian-owned economic enterprises, as
defined in section 3 of the Indian Financing Act of 1974 (25 U.S.C.
1452), when awarding any contract or subgrant.
Sec. 668.530 What rules govern the issuance of contracts and/or
subgrants?
In general, INA grantees must follow the rules of OMB Circulars A-
102 (for tribes) or A-110 (for private non-profits) when awarding
contracts and/or subgrants under WIA section 166. The common rules
implementing those circulars are codified for DOL-funded programs at 29
CFR part 97 (A-102) or 29 CFR part 95 (A-110), and covered in the WIA
regulations at 20 CFR 667.200. These rules do not apply to OJT contract
awards.
Subpart F--Accountability for Services and Expenditures
Sec. 668.600 To whom is the INA grantee accountable for the provision
of services and the expenditure of INA funds?
(a) The INA grantee is responsible to the Native American community
to be served by INA funds.
(b) The INA grantee is also responsible to the Department of Labor,
which is charged by law with ensuring that all WIA funds are expended:
(1) according to applicable laws and regulations;
(2) for the benefit of the identified Native American client group;
and
(3) for the purposes approved in the grantee's plan and signed
grant document.
Sec. 668.610 How is this accountability documented and fulfilled?
(a) Each INA grantee must establish its own internal policies and
procedures to ensure accountability to the INA grantee's governing
body, as the representative of the Native American community(ies)
served by the INA program. At a minimum, these policies and procedures
must provide a system for governing body review and oversight of
program plans and measures and standards for program performance.
(b) Accountability to the Department is accomplished in part
through on-site program reviews (monitoring), which strengthen the INA
grantee's capability to deliver effective services and protect the
integrity of Federal funds.
(c) In addition to audit information, as described at Sec. 668.850,
and program reviews, accountability to the Department is documented and
fulfilled by the submission of reports. These report requirements are
as follows:
(1) Each INA grantee must submit an annual report on program
participants and activities. This report must be received no later than
90 days after the end of the Program Year, and may be combined with the
report on program expenditures. The reporting format is developed by
DINAP, in consultation with the Native American Advisory Council, and
published in the Federal Register.
(2) Each INA grantee must submit an annual report on program
expenditures. This report must be received no later than 90 days after
the end of the Program Year, and may be combined with the report on
program participants and activities. For the purposes of report
submission, a postmark or date indicating receipt by a private express
delivery service is acceptable proof of timely submission.
(3) INA grantees are encouraged, but not required, to submit a
descriptive narrative with their annual reports describing the barriers
to successful plan implementation they have encountered. This narrative
should also discuss program successes and other notable occurrences
that effected the INA grantee's overall performance that year.
(4) Each INA grantee may be required to submit interim reports on
program participants and activities and/or program expenditures during
the Program Year. Interim reports must be received no later than 45
days after the end of the reporting period.
Sec. 668.620 What performance measures are in place for the INA
program?
Indicators of performance measures and levels of performance in use
for INA program will be those indicators and standards proposed in
individual grantee plans and approved by DOL, in accordance with
guidelines developed by the Department in consultation with INA
grantees under WIA section 166(h)(2)(A).
Sec. 668.630 What are the requirements for preventing fraud and abuse
under section 166?
(a) Each INA grantee must implement program and financial
management procedures to prevent fraud and abuse. Such procedures must
include a process which enables the grantee to take action against
contractors or subgrantees to
[[Page 18744]]
prevent any misuse of funds. (WIA sec. 184.)
(b) Each INA grantee must have rules to prevent conflict of
interest by its governing body. These conflict of interest rules must
include a rule prohibiting any member of any governing body or council
associated with the INA grantee from voting on any matter which would
provide a direct financial benefit to that member, or to a member of
his or her immediate family, in accordance with 20 CFR 667.200(a)(4)
and 29 CFR 97.36(b) or 29 CFR 95.42.
(c) Officers or agents of the INA grantee must not solicit or
personally accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value
from any actual or potential contractor, subgrantee, vendor or
participant. This rule must also apply to officers or agents of the
grantee's contractors and/or subgrantees. This prohibition does not
apply to:
(1) Any rebate, discount or similar incentive provided by a vendor
to its customers as a regular feature of its business;
(2) Items of nominal monetary value distributed consistent with the
cultural practices of the Native American community served by the
grantee.
(d) No person who selects program participants or authorizes the
services provided to them may select or authorize services to any
participant who is such a person's husband, wife, father, mother,
brother, sister, son, or daughter unless:
(1)(i) The participant involved is a low income individual; or
(ii) The community in which the participant resides has a
population of less than 1,000 Native American people; and
(2) The INA grantee has adopted and implemented the policy
described in the Two Year Plan to prevent favoritism on behalf of such
relatives.
(e) INA grantees are subject to the provisions of 41 U.S.C. 53
relating to kickbacks.
(f) No assistance provided under this Act may involve political
activities. (WIA section 195(6).)
(g) INA grantees may not use funds under this Act for lobbying as
provided in 29 CFR part 93.
(h) The provisions of 18 U.S.C. 665 and 666 regarding embezzlement
apply to programs under WIA.
(i) Sectarian activities involving WIA funding or participants are
prohibited.
(j) INA grantees are prohibited from discriminatory practices as
outlined at WIA section 188, and the regulations implementing WIA
section 188. However, this does not affect the legal requirement that
all INA participants be Native American. Also, INA grantees are not
obligated to serve populations other than those for which they were
designated.
Sec. 668.640 What grievance systems must a section 166 program
provide?
INA grantees must establish grievance procedures consistent with
the requirements of WIA section 181(c) and 20 CFR 667.600.
Sec. 668.650 Can INA grantees exclude eligible segments of the
population?
(a) No. INA grantees cannot exclude segments of the eligible
population. INA grantees must document in their Two Year Plan that a
system is in place to afford all members of the eligible population
within the service area for which the grantee was designated an
equitable opportunity to receive WIA services and activities.
(b) Nothing in this section restricts the ability of INA grantees
to target subgroups of the eligible population (for example, the
disabled, substance abusers, TANF recipients, or similar categories),
as outlined in an approved Two Year Plan.
Subpart G--Section 166 Planning/Funding Process
Sec. 668.700 What process must an INA grantee use to plan its
employment and training services ?
(a) The INA grantee may utilize the planning procedures it uses to
plan other activities and services.
(b) However, in the process of preparing its Two Year Plan for
Native American WIA services, the INA grantee must consult with:
(1) Customers or prospective customers of such services;
(2) Prospective employers of program participants or their
representatives;
(3) Service providers, including local educational agencies, which
can provide services which support or are complementary to the
grantee's own services; and
(4) Tribal or other community officials responsible for the
development and administration of strategic community development
efforts.
Sec. 668.710 What planning documents must an INA grantee submit to the
Department?
Each grantee receiving funds under WIA sec. 166 must submit to
DINAP a comprehensive services plan and a projection of participant
services and expenditures covering the two-year planning cycle. The
Department will, in consultation with the Native American Advisory
Council, issue budget and planning instructions which grantees must use
when preparing their plan.
Sec. 668.720 What information must these planning documents contain?
(a) The comprehensive services plan must cover the two Program
Years included within a designation cycle. According to planning
instructions issued by the Department, the comprehensive services plan
must describe in narrative form:
(1) The specific goals of the INA grantee's program for the two
Program Years involved;
(2) The method the INA grantee will use to target its services on
specific segments of its service population;
(3) The array of services which the INA grantee intends to make
available;
(4) The system the INA grantee will use to be accountable for the
results of its program services. Such results must be judged in terms
of the outcomes for individual participants and/or the benefits the
program provides to the Native American community(ies) which the INA
grantee serves. Plans must include the performance information required
by Sec. 668.620;
(5) The ways in which the INA grantee will seek to integrate or
coordinate and ensure nonduplication of its employment and training
services with:
(i) The One-Stop delivery system in its local workforce investment
area, including a description of any MOU's which affect the grantee's
participation;
(ii) Other services provided by local Workforce Investment Boards;
(iii) Other program operators;
(iv) Other services available within the grantee organization; and
(v) Other services which are available to Native Americans in the
community, including planned participation in the One-Stop system.
(b) Beginning in PY 2000, eligible INA grantees must include in
their plan narratives a description of activities planned under the
supplemental youth program, including items described in paragraph (a)
(1) through (5) of this section.
(c) INA grantees must include a detailed budget of proposed
Administrative Costs, utilizing the definition at 20 CFR 667.220, to
use as a basis of negotiation with DINAP.
(d) INA grantees' plans must contain a projection of participant
services and expenditures for each Program Year, consistent with
guidance issued by the Department.
(e) For PY 1999, INA grantees who are early implementers under WIA
must prepare and submit an Annual Plan rather than a Two Year Plan.
[[Page 18745]]
Sec. 668.730 When must these plans be submitted?
(a) The two-year plans are due at a date specified by DINAP in the
year in which the two-year designation cycle begins. The Department
will announce exact submission dates in the biennial planning
instructions.
(b) Plans from INA grantees who are eligible for supplemental youth
services funds must include their supplemental youth plans as part of
their regular Two Year Plan. For PY 1999, a separate youth plan is
required, and INA grantees will be required to submit their plans
early, to allow for prompt funding of the youth component.
(c) INA grantees must submit modifications for the second year
reflecting exact funding amounts, after the individual allotments have
been determined. They will be submitted at a time determined by the
Department, but no later than June 1 prior to the beginning of the
second year of the designation cycle.
Sec. 668.740 How will the Department review and approve such plans?
(a) The Department will approve a grantee's planning documents
prior to the date on which funds for the program become available
unless:
(1) The planning documents do not contain the information specified
in these regulations; or
(2) The services which the INA grantee proposes are not permitted
under WIA or applicable regulations.
(b) The Department may approve a portion of the plan, and
disapprove other portions. The grantee also has the right to appeal the
Department's decision to the Office of the Administrative Law Judges
under the procedures at 20 CFR 667.800 or 667.840. While the INA
grantee exercises its right to appeal, the grantee must implement the
approved portions of the plan.
(c) If the Department disapproves all or part of an INA grantee's
plan, and that disapproval is sustained in the appeal process, the INA
grantee will be given the opportunity to amend its plan so that it can
be approved.
(d) If an INA grantee's plan is amended but is still disapproved,
the grantee will have the right to appeal the Department's decision to
the Offices of the Administrative Law Judges under the procedures at 20
CFR 667.800 or 667.840.
Sec. 668.750 Under what circumstances can the Department or the INA
grantee modify the terms of the grantee's plan(s)?
(a) The Department may unilaterally modify the INA grantee's plan
to add funds or, if required by Congressional action, to reduce the
amount of funds available for expenditure.
(b) The INA grantee may request Departmental approval to modify its
plan to add, expand, delete, or diminish any service allowable under
these regulations. The INA grantee may modify its plan without
Departmental approval, unless the modification reduces the total number
of participants to be served annually under the grantee's program by a
number which exceeds 25 percent of the participants previously proposed
to be served, or by 25 participants, whichever is larger.
(c) The Department will act upon any modification within thirty
(30) calendar days of receipt of the proposed modification. In the
event that further clarification or modification is required, the
Department may extend the thirty (30) day time frame to conclude
appropriate negotiations.
Subpart H--Administrative Requirements
Sec. 668.800 What systems must an INA grantee have in place to
administer an INA program?
(a) Each INA grantee must have a written system describing the
procedures the grantee uses with respect to:
(1) The hiring and management of personnel paid with program funds;
(2) The acquisition and management of property purchased with
program funds;
(3) Financial management practices;
(4) A participant grievance system which meets the requirements in
section 181(c) of WIA and 20 CFR 667.600; and
(5) A participant records system.
(b) Participant records systems must include:
(1) A written or computerized record containing all the information
used to determine the person's eligibility to receive program services;
(2) The participant's signature certifying that all the eligibility
information he or she provided is true to the best of his/her
knowledge; and
(3) The information necessary to comply with all program reporting
requirements.
Sec. 668.810 What types of costs are allowable expenditures under the
INA program?
Rules relating to allowable costs under WIA are covered in the
consolidated regulations at 20 CFR 667.200 through 667.220.
Sec. 668.820 What rules apply to administrative costs under the INA
program?
The definition and treatment of administrative costs are covered in
the consolidated regulations at 20 CFR 667.210 and 667.220.
Sec. 668.830 How should INA program grantees classify costs?
Cost classification is covered in the WIA regulations at 20 CFR
667.200 through 667.220. For purposes of the INA program, program costs
also include costs associated with other activities such as Tribal
Employment Rights Office (TERO), and supportive services as defined in
WIA sec. 101(46).
Sec. 668.840 What cost principles apply to INA funds?
The cost principles described in OMB Circulars A-87 (for tribal
governments), A-122 (for private non-profits), and A-21 (for
educational institutions), and the regulations at 20 CFR 667.200(c),
apply to INA grantees, depending on the nature of the grantee
organization.
Sec. 668.850 What audit requirements apply to INA grants?
The audit requirements established under the Department's
regulations at 29 CFR part 99, which implement OMB Circular A-133,
apply to all Native American WIA grants. These regulations, for all of
WIA, are cited at 20 CFR 667.200(b). Audit resolution procedures are
covered at 20 CFR 667.500 and 667.510.
Sec. 668.860 What cash management procedures apply to INA grant funds?
INA grantees must draw down funds only as they actually need them.
The U.S. Department of Treasury regulations which implement the Cash
Management Improvement Act, found at 31 CFR part 205, apply by law to
most recipients of Federal funds. Special rules may apply to those
grantees required to keep their funds in interest-bearing accounts, and
to grantees participating in the demonstration under Pub. L. 102-477.
Sec. 668.870 What is ``program income'' and how is it regulated in the
INA program?
(a) Program income is defined and regulated by WIA section 195(7),
20 CFR 667.200(a)(5) and the applicable rules in 29 CFR parts 95 and
97.
(b) For grants made under this part, program income does not
include income generated by the work of a work experience participant
in an enterprise, including an enterprise owned by an Indian tribe or
Alaska Native entity, whether in the public or private sector.
(c) Program income does not include income generated by the work of
an OJT
[[Page 18746]]
participant in an establishment under paragraph (b) of this section.
Subpart I--Miscellaneous Program Provisions
Sec. 668.900 Does the WIA provide regulatory and/or statutory waiver
authority?
Yes. WIA section 166(h)(3) permits waivers of any statutory or
regulatory requirement imposed upon INA grantees (except for the areas
cited in Sec. 668.920). Such waivers may include those necessary to
facilitate WIA support of long term community development goals.
Sec. 668.910 What information is required to document a requested
waiver?
To request a waiver, an INA grantee must submit a plan indicating
how the waiver will improve the grantee's WIA program activities. The
Department will provide further guidance on the waiver process,
consistent with the provisions of WIA section 166(h)(3).
Sec. 668.920 What provisions of law or regulations may not be waived?
Requirements relating to:
(a) Wage and labor standards;
(b) Worker rights;
(c) Participation and protection of workers and participants;
(d) Grievance procedures;
(e) Judicial review; and
(f) Non-discrimination may not be waived. (WIA sec 166(h)(3)(A).)
Sec. 668.930 May INA grantees combine or consolidate their employment
and training funds?
Yes. INA grantees may consolidate their employment and training
funds under WIA with assistance received from related programs in
accordance with the provisions of the Indian Employment, Training and
Related Services Demonstration Act of 1992 (Pub. L. 102-477) (25 U.S.C.
3401 et seq.). Also, Federally-recognized tribes that administer INA
funds and funds provided by more than one State under other sections of
WIA title I may enter into an agreement with the Governors to transfer
the State funds to the INA program. (WIA sec. 166(f) and (h)(6).)
Sec. 668.940 What is the role of the Native American Employment and
Training Council?
The Native American Employment and Training Council is a body
composed of representatives of the grantee community which advises the
Secretary on all aspects of Native American employment and training
program implementation. WIA section 166(h)(4) continues the Council
essentially as it is currently constituted, with the exception that all
the Council members no longer have to be Native American. However, the
nature of the consultative process remains essentially unchanged. The
Department continues to support the Council.
PART 669--MIGRANT AND SEASONAL FARMWORKER PROGRAMS UNDER TITLE I OF
THE WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT
Subpart A--Purpose and Definitions
Sec.
669.100 What is the purpose of the Migrant and Seasonal Farmworker
(MSFW) Program established under WIA section 167?
669.110 What definitions apply to this program?
669.120 How is the MSFW program administered by the Department of
Labor?
669.130 What unit within the Department administers the Migrant and
Seasonal Farmworker programs funded under WIA section 167?
669.140 How does the DSFP assist the MSFW grantee organizations
serve farmworker customers?
669.150 How are regulations established for this program?
669.160 How does the Department consult with MSFW organizations in
developing rules, regulations and standards of accountability and
other policy guidance for the MSFW Programs?
669.170 What WIA regulations apply to the programs funded under WIA
section 167?
Subpart B--MSFW Program's Service Delivery System
669.200 Who is eligible to receive a MSFW grant?
669.210 How does an eligible entity become a MSFW grantee?
669.220 What is the role of the MSFW grantee in the One-Stop
delivery system?
669.230 Can a MSFW grantee's designation be terminated?
669.240 How will the Department use funds appropriated under WIA
section 167 for MSFW programs?
Subpart C--MSFW Program Customers and Available Program Services
669.300 What are the general responsibilities of the MSFW grantees?
669.310 What are the basic components of a MSFW service delivery
strategy?
669.320 Who is eligible to receive services under the MSFW Program?
669.330 How are services delivered to the customer?
669.340 What core services are available to eligible MSFWs?
669.350 How are core services delivered to MSFWs?
669.360 May grantees provide emergency assistance to MSFWs?
669.370 What intensive services may be provided to eligible MSFWs?
669.380 What is the objective assessment that is authorized as an
intensive service?
669.400 What are the elements of the IEP that is authorized as an
intensive service?
669.410 What training services may be provided to eligible MSFWs?
669.420 What must be included in an on-the-job training contract?
Subpart D--Performance Accountability, Planning and Waiver Provision
669.500 What performance measures and standards apply to the MSFW
Program?
669.510 What planning documents must a MSFW grantee submit to the
Department?
669.520 What information is required in the MSFW grant plans?
669.530 What are the submission dates for these plans?
669.540 Under what circumstances are the terms of the grantee's
plan modified by the grantee or the Department?
669.550 How are costs classified under the MSFW Program?
669.560 Are there regulatory and/or statutory waiver provisions
that apply to WIA section 167?
669.570 What information is required to document a requested
waiver?
Subpart E--The MSFW Youth Program
669.600 What is the purpose of the WIA section 167 MSFW Youth
Program?
669.610 What is the relationship between the MSFW youth program and
the MSFW program authorized at WIA section 167?
669.620 How do the MSFW youth program regulations apply to the MSFW
program authorized under WIA section 167?
669.630 What are the requirements for designation as a ``MSFW youth
program grantee'?
669.640 What is the process for applying for designation as a MSFW
youth program grantee?
669.650 How are MSFW youth funds allocated to section 167 grantees?
669.660 What planning documents and information are required in the
application for MSFW youth grants and when must they be filed?
669.670 Who is eligible to receive services under the section 167
MSFW youth program?
669.680 What activities and services may be provided under the MSFW
youth program?
Authority: section 506(c), Pub. L. 105-220; 20 U.S.C. 9276(c)
Subpart A--Purpose and Definitions
Sec. 669.100 What is the purpose of the Migrant and Seasonal
Farmworker (MSFW) program established under WIA section 167?
The purpose of the MSFW Program is to strengthen the ability of
eligible migrant and seasonal farmworkers and their families to achieve
economic self-sufficiency. This part provides the regulatory
requirements applicable to the expenditure of WIA section 167 funds for
such program.
[[Page 18747]]
Sec. 669.110 What definitions apply to this program?
In addition to the definitions found in WIA secs. 101 and 167 and
in 20 CFR 660.330, the following definitions apply to programs under
this subpart:
Allowances means direct payments, which must not exceed the higher
of the State or Federal minimum wage, made to MSFW participants during
their enrollment to enable them to participate in training services.
Capacity enhancement means the technical assistance afforded to
grantees and grantee staff by the Department to improve the quality of
the program and the delivery of program services to MSFWs.
Department means the U.S. Department of Labor, including its
agencies and organizational units, unless otherwise indicated.
Disadvantaged means a farmworker whose income, for any 12
consecutive months out of the 24 months immediately before the
farmworker applies for the program, does not exceed the higher of
either the poverty line or 70 percent of the lower living standard
income level.
DSFP means the Division of Seasonal Farmworker Programs within the
Employment and Training Administration of the Department, or a
successor organizational unit.
Eligibility determination period means any consecutive 12-month
period within the 24-month period immediately preceding the date of
application for the MSFW program by the applicant farmworker.
Emergency Assistance means assistance that addresses immediate
needs of farmworkers and their families, provided by MSFW grantees.
Except for evidence to support legal working status in the United
States and Selective Service registration, where applicable, the
applicant's self-attestation is accepted as eligibility for emergency
assistance.
Farmwork means those occupations in the agricultural industries
identified by the Department for inclusion in its allocation formula
for MSFW-funded programs.
MSFW program grantee means an entity which is awarded a WIA grant
directly from the Department to carry out the MSFW program in one or
more designated States or substate areas.
MSFW means a Migrant or Seasonal Farmworker under WIA section 167.
MOU means Memorandum of Understanding.
Self-certification means a farmworker's signed attestation that the
information he/she submits to demonstrate eligibility for the MSFW
program is true and accurate.
Service area means the geographical jurisdiction in which a WIA
section 167 grantee is designated to operate.
Work experience means a planned, structured learning experience
that takes place in a workplace for a limited period of time. Work
experience may paid or unpaid, as appropriate.
Sec. 669.120 How is the MSFW program administered by the Department of
Labor?
This program is centrally administered by the Department of Labor
in a manner consistent with the requirements of WIA section 167. As
described in Sec. 669.210, the Secretary designates grantees using
procedures consistent with standard Federal government competitive
procedures. The Secretary awards other grants and contracts using
similar competitive procedures.
Sec. 669.130 What unit within the Department administers the Migrant
and Seasonal Farmworker programs funded under WIA section 167?
The Department has designated the Division of Seasonal Farmworker
Programs (DSFP), or its successor organization, within the Employment
and Training Administration, as the organizational unit that
administers MSFW programs at the Federal level.
Sec. 669.140 How does the DSFP assist the MSFW grantee organizations
serve farmworker customers?
The Department provides technical assistance and training to MSFW
grantees, for the purposes of program implementation and program
performance management leading to enhancement of services to and
continuous improvement in the employment outcomes of farmworkers.
Sec. 669.150 How are regulations established for this program?
In developing regulations for WIA section 167, the Secretary
consults with the Migrant and Seasonal Farmworker Employment and
Training Advisory Committee. The regulations and program guidance
consider the economic circumstances and demographics of eligible
migrant and seasonal farmworkers.
Sec. 669.160 How does the Department consult with MSFW organizations
in developing rules, regulations and standards of accountability and
other policy guidance for the MSFW Programs?
(a) The Department considers the MSFW grantee community as a full
partner in the development of policies for the MSFW programs under the
Act.
(b) The Department has established and continues to support the
MSFW Employment and Training Advisory Committee. Through the Advisory
Committee, the Department actively seeks and considers the views of the
grantee community prior to establishing policies and/or program
regulations, according to the requirements of WIA section 167.
Sec. 669.170 What WIA regulations apply to the programs funded under
WIA section 167?
(a) The regulations found in this subpart;
(b) The general administrative requirements found in 20 CFR part
667, including the regulations concerning Complaints, Investigations
and Hearings found at 20 CFR part 667, subpart E through subpart H,
which cover programs under WIA section 167;
(c) The Department's regulations codifying the common rules
implementing Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circulars, which
generally apply to Federal programs carried out by State and local
governments and nonprofit organizations at 29 CFR parts 95, 96, 97, and
99, as applicable.
Subpart B--MSFW Program's Service Delivery System
Sec. 669.200 Who is eligible to receive a MSFW grant?
(a) To be eligible to receive a grant under this section, an entity
must have:
(1) An understanding of the problems of eligible migrant and
seasonal farmworkers and their dependents;
(2) A familiarity with the agricultural industry and the labor
market needs of the geographic area to be served;
(3) The capacity to effectively administer a diversified program of
workforce investment activities and related assistance for eligible
migrant and seasonal farmworkers (including farmworker youth) as
described in paragraph (b) of this section.
(b) For purposes of paragraph (a)(3) of this section, an entity's
``capacity to effectively administer'' a program may be demonstrated
by:
(1) Organizational experience; or
(2) Significant experience of its key staff in administering
similar programs.
Sec. 669.210 How does an eligible entity become a MSFW grantee?
To become a MSFW grantee and receive a grant under this subpart,
the entity must respond to a Solicitation for Grant Applications (SGA).
The SGA may contain additional requirements for the grant application
or the grantee's two-year plan. Under the SGA, grantees
[[Page 18748]]
will be selected using standard Federal Government competitive
procedures. The entity's proposal must describe a two-year strategy for
meeting the needs of eligible migrant and seasonal farmworkers in the
geographic area the entity seeks to serve.
Sec. 669.220 What is the role of the MSFW grantee in the One-Stop
delivery system?
(a) In those local areas where there is a grantee MSFW field
office, the grantee is a required partner of the local One-Stop
delivery system and is subject to the provisions relating to such
partners described in 20 CFR part 662. Consistent with those
provisions, the grantee and the Local Board must negotiate an MOU which
sets forth their respective responsibilities for making the full range
of core services available to farmworkers. In local areas without a
grantee MSFW field office but with a large concentration of MSFWs, the
grantee should consider the availability of electronic connections and
other means to participate in the One-stop system in that area, in
order to serve those individuals.
(b) The MOU should reflect appropriate and equitable services to
MSFWs, and may include costs of services to MSFWs incurred by the One-
Stop that extend beyond Wagner-Peyser funded services and activities.
Sec. 669.230 Can a MSFW grantee's designation be terminated?
Yes, a grantee's designation may be terminated for cause:
(a) By the Secretary, in emergency circumstances when such action
is necessary to protect the integrity of Federal funds or ensure the
proper operation of the program. Any grantee so terminated will be
provided with written notice and an opportunity for a hearing within 30
days after the termination (WIA sec. 184(e).); or
(b) By the Grant Officer, if there is a substantial or persistent
violation of the requirements in the Act or these regulations. In such
a case, the Grant Officer must provide the grantee with 60 days prior
written notice, stating the reasons why termination is proposed, and
the applicable appeal procedures.
Sec. 669.240 How will the Department use funds appropriated under WIA
section 167 for MSFW programs?
(a) At least 94 percent of the funds appropriated each year for WIA
section 167 activities must be allocated to State service areas, based
on the distribution of the eligible MSFW population determined under a
formula which has been published in the Federal Register. Grants are
awarded under the competitive process for the provision of services to
eligible farmworkers within each service area.
(b) The balance, 6 percent of the appropriated funds, will be used
for discretionary purposes for such activities as grantee technical
assistance and support of farmworker housing activities.
Subpart C--MSFW Program Customers and Available Program Services
Sec. 669.300 What are the general responsibilities of the MSFW
grantees?
Each grantee is responsible for providing needed services in
accordance with a service delivery strategy described in its approved
grant plan. These services must reflect the needs of the MSFW
population in the service area and include the services and training
activities that are necessary to achieve each participant's employment
goals.
Sec. 669.310 What are the basic components of a MSFW service delivery
strategy?
The MSFW service delivery strategy must include:
(a) A customer-centered case management approach;
(b) The provision of workforce investment activities, which
include, core services, intensive services, and training services as
described in WIA section 134, as appropriate;
(c) The arrangements under the MOUs with the applicable Local
Workforce Investment Boards for the delivery of core services to MSFWs.
Sec. 669.320 Who is eligible to receive services under the MSFW
Program?
Disadvantaged migrant and seasonal farmworkers, as defined in
Sec. 669.110, and their dependents are eligible for services funded by
the MSFW program.
Sec. 669.330 How are services delivered to the customer?
To ensure that all services are focused on the customer's needs,
services are provided through a case-management approach and may
include: Core, intensive and training services; and related assistance,
which includes emergency assistance and supportive services. The basic
services and delivery of case-management activities are further
described at Secs. 669.340 through 669.410 of this subpart. Consistent
with 20 CFR part 663, prior to intensive services, a participant must
receive at least one core service, and, prior to training services, a
participant must receive at least one intensive service.
Sec. 669.340 What core services are available to eligible MSFWs?
The core services identified in WIA section 134(d)(2).
Sec. 669.350 How are core services delivered to MSFWs?
(a) The full range of core services are available to MSFWs, as well
as other individuals, at One-Stop Centers as described in 20 CFR part
662.
(b) Where a MSFW field office is located within the workforce
investment area of a One-Stop center, core services must be made
available through the One-Stop delivery system, as determined in the
required MOU between the Local Board and the MSFW grantee.
Sec. 669.360 May grantees provide emergency assistance to MSFWs?
(a) Yes. Emergency assistance (as defined in Sec. 669.110 of this
part) is a form of the related assistance that is authorized under WIA
section 167(d) and may be provided by a grantee as described in the
grant plan.
(b) In providing emergency assistance, the MSFW may use an
abbreviated eligibility determination process that accepts the
applicant's self-attestation as final evidence of eligibility, except
that self-attestation may not be used to establish the requirements of
legal working status in the United States, and Selective Service
registration, where applicable.
Sec. 669.370 What intensive services may be provided to eligible
MSFWs?
(a) Intensive services available to farmworkers include those
described in WIA section 134(d)(3)(C).
(b) Intensive services may also include:
(1) Dropout prevention activities;
(2) Allowance payments;
(3) Work experience, which:
(i) Is designed to promote the development of good work habits and
basic work skills at the work-site (work experience may be conducted
with public and private non-profit and private for-profit sectors); and
(ii) Compensates participants at no less than the applicable State
or Federal minimum wage.
(4) Literacy and English-as-a-Second language; and
(5) Other services identified in the approved grant plan.
Sec. 669.380 What is the objective assessment that is authorized as an
intensive service?
(a) An objective assessment is a procedure designed to
comprehensively assess the skills, abilities, and interests of each
employment and training
[[Page 18749]]
participant through the use of diagnostic testing and other assessment
tools. The methods used by the grantee in conducting the objective
assessment may include:
(1) Structured in-depth interviews;
(2) Skills and aptitude assessments;
(3) Performance assessments (for example, skills or work samples,
including those that measure interest and capability to train in
nontraditional employment);
(4) Interest or attitude inventories;
(5) Career guidance instruments;
(6) Aptitude tests; and
(7) Basic skills tests.
(b) The objective assessment is an ongoing process that requires
the grantee staff to remain in close consultation with each participant
to continuously obtain current information about the participant's
progress that may be relevant to his/her Individual Employment Plan
(IEP).
Sec. 669.400 What are the elements of the IEP that is authorized as an
intensive service?
The elements of the IEP are:
(a) Joint development: The grantee develops the IEP in partnership
with the participant;
(b) Customer focus: The combination of services chosen with the
participant must be consistent with the results of any objective
assessment, responsive to the expressed goals of the participant, and
must include periodic evaluation of planned goals and a record of
accomplishments in consultation with the participant;
(c) Length/type of service: The type and duration of intensive or
training services must be based upon:
(1) The employment/career goal;
(2) Referrals to other programs for specified activities; and
(3) The delivery agents and schedules for intensive services,
training and training-related supportive services; and
(d) Privacy: As a customer-centered case management tool, an IEP is
a personal record and must receive confidential treatment.
Sec. 669.410 What training services may be provided to eligible MSFWs?
(a) Training services include those described in WIA sections
134(d)(4)(D) and 167(d), and may be described in the IEP and may
include:
(1) On-the-job training activities under a contract between the
participating employer and the grantee;
(2) Workplace safety and farmworker pesticide training;
(3) Housing development assistance;
(4) Training-related supportive services; and
(b) Other training activities identified in the approved grant
plan.
Sec. 669.420 What must be included in an on-the-job training contract?
At a minimum, the on-the-job training contract must include:
(a) The occupation(s) for which training is to be provided;
(b) The duration of training;
(c) The wage rate to be paid to the trainee;
(d) The rate of reimbursement;
(e) The maximum amount of reimbursement;
(f) A training outline that reflects the work skills required for
the position;
(g) An outline of any other separate classroom training that may be
provided by the employer;
(h) Application of the general program requirements of WIA section
195(4) and section 101(31); and
(i) The employer's agreement to maintain and make available time
and attendance, payroll and other records to support amounts claimed by
the employer for reimbursement under the OJT contract;
Subpart D--Performance Accountability, Planning and Waiver
Provision
Sec. 669.500 What performance measures and standards apply to the MSFW
Program?
(a) The MSFW program will use the core indicators of performance
common to the adult and youth programs, described in 20 CFR part 666.
The levels of performance for the farmworker indicators will be
established pursuant to a negotiation between the Department and the
grantee. The levels must take into account the characteristics of the
population to be served and the economic conditions in the service
area. Proposed levels of performance are to be included in the grantee
plan submission, and the agreed to levels must be included in the
approved plan.
(b) The Department may develop additional performance indicators
with appropriate levels of performance for evaluating programs that
serve farmworkers and which are reflective of the State service area
economy and local demographics of eligible MSFWs. The levels of
performance for these additional indicators must be negotiated with the
grantee and included in the approved plan.
Sec. 669.510 What planning documents must a MSFW grantee submit to the
Department?
Each grantee receiving WIA section 167 program funds must submit to
DSFP a comprehensive service delivery plan and a projection of
participant services and expenditures covering the two-year designation
cycle.
Sec. 669.520 What information is required in the MSFW grant plans?
An MSFW grantee's biennial plan must describe:
(a) The employment and education needs of the farmworker population
to be served;
(b) The manner in which proposed services to farmworkers and their
families will strengthen their ability to obtain or retain employment
or stabilize their agricultural employment;
(c) The related assistance and supportive services to be provided
and the manner in which such assistance and services are to be
coordinated with other available services;
(d) The performance indicators and proposed levels of performance
used to assess the performance of such entity, including the specific
goals of the grantee's program for the two Program Years involved;
(e) The method the grantee will use to target its services on
specific segments of the eligible population, as appropriate;
(f) The array of services which the grantee intends to make
available, with costs specified on forms prescribed by the Department.
These forms will indicate how many participants the grantee expects to
serve, by activity, the results expected under the grantee's plan, and
the anticipated expenditures by cost category; and
(g) Its response to any other requirements set forth in the SGA
issued under Sec. 669.210 of this part.
Sec. 669.530 What are the submission dates for these plans?
Plan submission dates will be announced by the Department in the
SGA issued under Sec. 669.220 of this part.
Sec. 669.540 Under what circumstances are the terms of the grantee's
plan modified by the grantee or the Department?
(a) Plans must be modified to reflect the funding level for the
second year of the designation cycle. Modifications for second year
funding must be submitted at a time to be determined by the Department,
generally no later than June 1 prior to the beginning of the second
year of the designation cycle.
(b) The Department may unilaterally modify the grantee's plan to
add funds or, if the total amount of funds available for allotment is
reduced by Congress, to reduce each grantee's grant amount.
(c) The grantee may modify its plan to add, delete, expand, or
reduce any part of the program plan or allowable activities. Such
modifications may be made by the grantee without Departmental approval
except where the modification reduces the total number
[[Page 18750]]
of participants to be served annually under intensive and/or training
services by 15 percent or more, in which case the plan may only be
modified with Departmental approval.
(d) If the grantee is approved for a regulatory waiver under
Secs. 669.560 and 669.570, the grantee must submit a modification of
its service delivery plan to reflect the effect of the waiver.
Sec. 669.550 How are costs classified under the MSFW Program?
Costs are classified as follows:
(a) Administrative costs, as defined in 20 CFR 667.220; and
(b) Program costs, which are all other costs not defined as
administrative.
Program costs must be classified and reported in the following
categories:
(1) Related assistance including emergency assistance and
supportive services, including allocated staff costs; and
(2) All other program services, including allocated staff costs.
Sec. 669.560 Are there regulatory and/or statutory waiver provisions
that apply to WIA section 167?
(a) The statutory waiver provision at WIA section 189(i) does not
apply to WIA section 167.
(b) MSFW grantees may request waiver of any regulatory provisions
only when such regulatory provisions are:
(1) Not required by WIA;
(2) Not related to wage and labor standards, nondisplacement
protection, worker rights, participation and protection of workers and
participants, and eligibility of participants, grievance procedures,
judicial review, nondiscrimination, allocation of funds, procedures for
review and approval of plans; and
(3) Not related to the key reform principles embodied in WIA,
described in 20 CFR 661.400.
Sec. 669.570 What information is required to document a requested
waiver?
(a) To request a waiver, a grantee must submit a waiver plan that:
(1) Describes the goals of the waiver, the expected programmatic
outcomes, and how the waiver will improve the provision of WIA
activities;
(2) Is consistent with guidelines established by the Department and
the waiver provisions at 20 CFR 661.400 through 661.420; and
(b) Includes a modified service delivery plan reflecting the effect
of requested waiver.
Subpart E--The MSFW Youth Program
Sec. 669.600 What is the purpose of the WIA section 167 MSFW Youth
Program?
The purpose of the MSFW youth program is to provide an effective
and comprehensive array of educational opportunities, employment
skills, and life enhancement activities to at-risk and out-of-school
MSFW youth that lead to success in school, economic stability and
development into productive members of society.
Sec. 669.610 What is the relationship between the MSFW youth program
and the MSFW program authorized at WIA section 167?
The MSFW youth program is funded under WIA section
127(b)(1)(A)(iii) to provide farmworker youth activities under the
auspices of WIA section 167. These funds are specifically earmarked for
MSFW youth. Funds provided for the section 167 program may also be used
for youth, but are not limited to this age group.
Sec. 669.620 How do the MSFW youth program regulations apply to the
MSFW program authorized under WIA section 167?
(a) This subpart applies only to the administration of grants for
MSFW youth programs funded under WIA section 127(b)(1)(A)(iii).
(b) The regulations for the MSFW program in this part apply to the
administration of the MSFW youth program, except as modified in this
subpart.
Sec. 669.630 What are the requirements for designation as a ``MSFW
youth program grantee''?
Any entity may apply for designation as a ``MSFW youth program
grantee'' consistent with requirements described in the SGA. The
Department gives special consideration to an entity in any service area
for which the entity has been designated as a WIA section 167 MSFW
program grantee.
Sec. 669.640 What is the process for applying for designation as a
MSFW youth program grantee?
(a) To apply for designation as a MSFW youth program grantee,
entities must respond to an SGA by submitting a plan that meets the
requirements of WIA section 167(c)(2) and describes a two-year strategy
for meeting the needs of eligible MSFW youth in the service area the
entity seeks to serve.
(b) The designation process is conducted competitively (subject to
Sec. 669.210) through a selection process distinct from the one used to
select WIA section 167 MSFW program grantees.
Sec. 669.650 How are MSFW youth funds allocated to section 167
grantees?
The allocation of funds among entities designated as WIA section
167 MSFW Youth Program grantees is based on the comparative merits of
the applications, in accordance with criteria set forth in the SGA.
However, the Secretary may include criteria in the SGA that promote a
geographical distribution of funds and that encourages both large- and
small-scale programs.
Sec. 669.660 What planning documents and information are required in
the application for MSFW youth grants and when must they be filed?
The required planning documents and other required information and
the submission dates for filing are described in the SGA.
Sec. 669.670 Who is eligible to receive services under the section 167
MSFW youth program?
Disadvantaged youth, ages 14 through 21, who are individually
eligible or are members of eligible families under the WIA sec. 167
MSFW program may receive these services.
Sec. 669.680 What activities and services may be provided under the
MSFW youth program?
(a) Based on an evaluation and assessment of the needs of MSFW
youth participants, grantees may provide activities and services to
MSFW youth that include:
(1) Intensive services and training services, as described in
Secs. 669.400 and 669.410 of this part;
(2) Life skills activities which may include self and interpersonal
skills development;
(3) Community service projects;
(4) Small business development technical assistance and training in
conjunction with entrepreneurial training;
(5) Supportive services; and
(b) Other activities and services that conform to the use of funds
for youth activities described in 20 CFR part 664.
PART 670--THE JOB CORPS UNDER TITLE I OF THE WORKFORCE INVESTMENT
ACT
Subpart A--Scope and Purpose
Sec.
670.100 What is the scope of this part?
670.110 What is the Job Corps program?
670.120 What definitions apply to this part?
670.130 What is the role of the Job Corps Director?
[[Page 18751]]
Subpart B--Site Selection and Protection and Maintenance of Facilities
670.200 Who decides where Job Corps centers will be located?
670.210 How are center facility improvements and new construction
handled?
Sec.670.220 Is the Secretary responsible for protection and
maintenance of center facilities?
Subpart C--Funding and Selection of Service Providers
670.300 What entities are eligible to receive funds to operate
centers and provide training and operational support services?
670.310 How are entities selected to receive funding?
670.320 What are the requirements for award of contracts and
payments to Federal agencies?
Subpart D--Recruitment, Eligibility, Screening, Selection and
Assignment, and Enrollment
670.400 Who is eligible to participate in the Job Corps program?
670.410 Are there additional factors which are considered in
selecting an eligible applicant for enrollment?
670.420 Are there any special requirements for enrollment related
to the Military Selective Service Act?
670.430 What entities conduct outreach and admissions activities
for the Job Corps program?
670.440 What are the responsibilities of outreach and admissions
agencies?
670.450 How are applicants who meet eligibility and selection
criteria assigned to centers?
670.460 What restrictions are there on the assignment of eligible
applicants for nonresidential enrollment in Job Corps?
670.470 May a person who is determined to be ineligible or an
individual who is denied enrollment appeal that decision?
670.480 At what point is an applicant considered to be enrolled in
Job Corps?
670.490 How long can a student be enrolled in Job Corps?
Subpart E--Program Activities and Center Operations
670.500 What services must Job Corps centers provide?
670.505 What types of training must Job Corps centers provide?
670.510 Are Job Corps center operators responsible for providing
all vocational training?
670.515 What responsibilities does the center operators have in
managing work-based learning?
670.520 Are students permitted to hold jobs other than work-based
learning opportunities?
670.525 What residential support services must Job Corps center
operators provide?
670.530 Are Job Corps centers required to maintain a student
accountability system?
670.535 Are Job Corps centers required to establish behavior
management systems?
670.540 What is Job Corps' zero tolerance policy?
670.545 How does Job Corps ensure that students receive due process
in disciplinary actions?
670.550 What responsibilities do Job Corps centers have in
assisting students with child care needs?
670.555 What are the center's responsibilities in ensuring that
students' religious rights are respected?
670.560 Is Job Corps authorized to conduct pilot and demonstration
projects?
Subpart F--Student Support
670.600 Is government-paid transportation provided to Job Corps
students?
670.610 When are students authorized to take leaves of absence from
their Job Corps centers?
670.620 Are Job Corps students eligible to receive cash allowances
and performance bonuses?
670.630 Are student allowances subject to Federal Payroll Taxes?
670.640 Are students provided with clothing?
Subpart G--Placement and Continued Services
670.700 What are Job Corps centers' responsibilities in preparing
students for placement services?
670.710 What placement services will be provided for Job Corps
students?
670.720 Who will provide placement services?
670.730 What are the responsibilities of placement agencies?
670.740 Must continued services be provided for graduates?
670.750 Who may provide continued services for graduates?
670.760 How will Job Corps coordinate with other agencies?
Subpart H--Community Connections
670.800 How do Job Corps centers and service providers become
involved in their local communities?
Subpart I--Administrative and Management Provisions
670.900 Are damages caused by students eligible for reimbursement
under the Tort Claims Act?
670.905 Are damages that occur to private parties at Job Corps
Centers eligible for reimbursement under the Tort Claims Act?
670.910 Are students entitled to Federal Employees Compensation
Benefits?
670.915 When are residential students considered to be in the
performance of duty?
670.920 When are non-resident students considered to be in the
performance of duty?
670.925 When are students considered to be not in the performance
of duty?
670.930 How are FECA benefits computed?
670.935 How will students be protected from unsafe or unhealthy
situations?
670.940 What are the requirements relating to criminal law
enforcement jurisdiction on center property?
670.945 Are Job Corps operators and service providers authorized to
pay State or local taxes on gross receipts?
670.950 What are the financial management responsibilities of Job
Corps center operators and other service providers?
670.955 Are Center Operators and Service Providers Subject to
Federal Audits?
670.960 What are the procedures for management of student records?
670.965 What procedures apply to disclosure of information about
Job Corps students and program activities?
670.970 What are the reporting requirements for center operators
and operational support service providers?
670.975 How will performance of the Job Corps program be assessed?
670.980 What are the indicators of performance for Job Corps?
670.985 What happens if a center operator, screening and admissions
contractor or other service provider fails to meet the expected
levels of performance?
670.990 What procedures are available to resolve complaints and
disputes?
670.991 How does Job Corps ensure that complaints or disputes are
resolved in a timely fashion?
670.992 How does Job Corps ensure that centers or other service
providers comply with the Act and regulations?
670.993 How does Job Corps ensure that contract disputes will be
resolved?
670.994 How does Job Corps resolve disputes between DOL and other
Federal Agencies?
670.995 What DOL equal opportunity and nondiscrimination
regulations apply to Job Corps?
Authority: Sec. 506(c), Pub. L. 105-220; 20 U.S.C. 9276(c).
Subpart A--Scope and Purpose
Sec. 670.100 What is the scope of this part?
The regulations in this part are an outline of the requirements
that apply to the Job Corps program. More detailed policies and
procedures are contained in a Policy and Requirements Handbook issued
by the Secretary. Throughout this part, phrases like ``according to
instructions (procedures) issued by the Secretary'' refer to the Policy
and Requirements Handbook and other Job Corps directives.
Sec. 670.110 What is the Job Corps program?
Job Corps is a national program that operates in partnership with
States and communities, local Workforce Investment Boards, youth
councils, One-Stop Centers and partners, and other youth programs to
provide education and training, primarily in a residential setting, for
low income young people. The objective of Job Corps is to provide young
people with the skills they need to obtain and hold a job, enter the
Armed Forces, or enroll in advanced training or further education.
[[Page 18752]]
Sec. 670.120 What definitions apply to this part?
The following definitions apply to this part:
Absent Without Official Leave (AWOL) means an adverse enrollment
status to which a student is assigned based on extended, unapproved
absence from his/her assigned center or off-center place of duty.
Students do not earn Job Corps allowances while in AWOL status.
Applicable local board means a local Workforce Investment Board
that:
(1) works with a Job Corps center and provides information on local
demand occupations, employment opportunities, and the job skills needed
to obtain the opportunities, and
(2) serves communities in which the graduates of the Job Corps seek
employment when they leave the program.
Capital improvement means any modification, addition, restoration
or other improvement:
(1) Which increases the usefulness, productivity, or serviceable
life of an existing site, facility, building, structure, or major item
of equipment;
(2) Which is classified for accounting purposes as a ``fixed
asset;'' and
(3) The cost of which increases the recorded value of the existing
building, site, facility, structure, or major item of equipment and is
subject to depreciation.
Center means a facility and an organizational entity, including all
of its parts, providing Job Corps training and designated as a Job
Corps center.
Center operator means a Federal, State or local agency, or a
contractor that runs a center under an agreement or contract with DOL.
Civilian conservation center (CCC) means a center operated on
public land under an agreement between DOL and another Federal agency,
which provides, in addition to other training and assistance, programs
of work-based learning to conserve, develop, or manage public natural
resources or public recreational areas or to develop community projects
in the public interest.
Contract center means a Job Corps center operated under a contract
with DOL.
Contracting officer means the Regional Director or other official
authorized to enter into contracts or agreements on behalf of DOL.
Enrollee means an individual who has voluntarily applied for, been
selected for, and enrolled in the Job Corps program, and remains with
the program, but has not yet become a graduate. Enrollees are referred
to as ``students'' in this part.
Enrollment means the process by which individual formally becomes a
student in the Job Corps program.
Graduate means an enrollee who has:
(1) Completed the requirements of a vocational training program, or
received a secondary school diploma or its equivalent as a result of
participating in the Job Corps program; and
(2) Achieved job readiness and employment skills as a result of
participating in the Job Corps program.
Individual with a disability means an individual with a disability
as defined in section 3 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
(42 U.S.C. 12102).
Interagency agreement means a formal agreement between DOL and
another Federal agency administering and operating centers. The
agreement establishes procedures for the funding, administration,
operation, and review of those centers as well as the resolution of any
disputes.
Job Corps means the agency of the Department established by section
143 of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (WIA) (20 U.S.C. 9201) to
perform those functions of the Secretary of Labor set forth in subtitle
C of WIA Title I.
Job Corps Director means the chief official of the Job Corps or a
person authorized to act for the Job Corps Director.
Low income individual means an individual who meets the definition
in WIA section 101(25).
National Office means the national office of Job Corps.
National training contractor means a labor union, union-affiliated
organization, business organization, association or a combination of
such organizations, which has a contract with the national office to
provide vocational training, placement, or other services.
Operational support services means activities or services required
to support the operation of Job Corps, including:
(1) Outreach and admissions services;
(2) Contracted vocational training and off-center training;
(3) Placement services;
(4) Continued services for graduates;
(5) Certain health services; and
(6) Miscellaneous logistical and technical support.
Outreach and admissions agency means an organization that performs
outreach, and screens and enrolls youth under a contract or other
agreement with Job Corps.
Placement means student employment, entry into the Armed Forces, or
enrollment in other training or education programs following separation
from Job Corps.
Placement agency means an organization acting under a contract or
other agreement with Job Corps to provide placement services for
graduates and, the extent possible, for former students.
Regional appeal board means the board designated by the Regional
Director to consider student appeals of disciplinary discharges.
Regional Director means the chief Job Corps official of a regional
office or a person authorized to act for the Regional Director.
Regional Office means a regional office of Job Corps.
Regional Solicitor means the chief official of a regional office of
the DOL Office of the Solicitor, or a person authorized to act for the
Regional Solicitor.
Separation means the action by which an individual ceases to be a
student in the Job Corps program, either voluntarily or involuntarily.
Student means an individual enrolled in the Job Corps.
Unauthorized goods means:
(1) Firearms and ammunition;
(2) Explosives and incendiaries;
(3) Knives with blades longer than 2 inches;
(4) Homemade weapons;
(5) All other weapons and instruments used primarily to inflict
personal injury;
(6) Stolen property;
(7) Drugs, including alcohol, marijuana, depressants, stimulants,
hallucinogens, tranquilizers, and drug paraphernalia except for drugs
and/or paraphernalia that are prescribed for medical reasons; and
(8) Any other goods prohibited by the center operator in a student
handbook.
Sec. 670.130 What is the role of the Job Corps Director?
The Job Corps Director has been delegated the authority to carry
out the responsibilities of the Secretary under Subtitle I-C of the
Act. Where the term ``Secretary'' is used in this part 670 to refer to
establishment or issuance of guidelines and standards directly relating
to the operation of the Job Corps program, the Job Corps Director has
that responsibility.
Subpart B--Site Selection and Protection and Maintenance of
Facilities
Sec. 670.200 Who decides where Job Corps centers will be located?
(a) The Secretary must approve the location and size of all Job
Corps centers.
(b) The Secretary establishes procedures for making decisions
[[Page 18753]]
concerning the establishment, relocation, expansion, or closing of
contract centers.
Sec. 670.210 How are center facility improvements and new construction
handled?
The Secretary issues procedures for requesting, approving, and
initiating capital improvements and new construction on Job Corps
centers.
Sec. 670.220 Is the Secretary responsible for protection and
maintenance of center facilities?
(a) Yes. The Secretary establishes procedures for the protection
and maintenance of contract center facilities owned or leased by the
Department of Labor, that are consistent with Federal Property
Management Regulations at 41 CFR Chapter 101.
(b) Federal agencies operating civilian conservation centers
(CCC's) on public land are responsible for protection and maintenance
of CCC facilities.
(c) The Secretary issues procedures for conducting periodic
facility surveys of centers to determine their condition and to
identify needs such as correction of safety and health deficiencies,
rehabilitation, and/or new construction.
Subpart C--Funding and Selection of Service Providers
Sec. 670.300 What entities are eligible to receive funds to operate
centers and provide training and operational support services?
(a) Entities eligible to receive funds under this subpart to
operate centers include:
(1) Federal, State, and local agencies;
(2) Private for-profit and non-profit corporations;
(3) Indian tribes and organizations; and
(4) Area vocational education or residential vocational schools.
(WIA sec. 147(a)(1)(A) and (d)).
(b) Entities eligible to receive funds to provide outreach and
admissions, placement and other operational support services include:
(1) One-Stop Centers and partners;
(2) Community action agencies;
(3) Business organizations;
(4) Labor organizations;
(5) Private for-profit and non-profit corporations; and
(6) Other agencies, and individuals that have experience and
contact with youth. (WIA sec. 145(a)(3)).
Sec. 670.310 How are entities selected to receive funding?
(a) The Secretary selects eligible entities to operate contract
centers and operational support service providers on a competitive
basis in accordance with the Federal Property and Administrative
Services Act of 1949 unless sections 303 (c) and (d) of that Act apply.
In selecting an entity, Job Corps issues requests for proposals (RFP)
for the operation of all contract centers and for provision of
operational support services according to Federal Acquisition
Regulation (48 CFR chapter 1, et seq.) and DOL Acquisition Regulation
(48 CFR chapter 29). Job Corps develops RFP's for center operators in
consultation with the Governor, the center industry council (if
established), and the Local Board for the workforce investment area in
which the center is located.
(b) The RFP for each contract center and each operational support
service contract describes uniform specifications and standards, as
well as specifications and requirements that are unique to the
operation of the specific center or to the specific required
operational support services.
(c) The contracting officer selects and funds Job Corps contract
center operators on the basis of an evaluation of the proposals
received using criteria established by the Secretary, and set forth in
the RFP. The criteria include the following:
(1) The offeror's ability to coordinate the activities carried out
through the Job Corps center with activities carried out under the
appropriate State and local workforce investment plans;
(2) The degree to which the offeror is proposing vocational
training that reflects employment opportunities in the local areas in
which most of the students intend to seek employment;
(3) The degree to which the offeror is familiar with the
surrounding community, including the applicable One-Stop Centers, and
the State and region in which the center is located; and
(4) The offeror's past performance.
(d) The contracting officer selects and funds operational support
service contractors on the basis of an evaluation of the proposals
received using criteria established by the Secretary and set forth in
the RFP.
(e) The Secretary enters into interagency agreements with Federal
agencies for the funding, establishment, and operation of CCCs which
will include provisions to ensure that the Federal agencies comply with
the regulations under this part.
Sec. 670.320 What are the requirements for award of contracts and
payments to Federal agencies?
(a) The requirements of the Federal Property and Administrative
Services Act of 1949, as amended; the Federal Grant and Cooperative
Agreement Act of 1977; the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR
chapter 1); and the DOL Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR chapter 29)
apply to the award of contracts and to payments to Federal agencies.
(b) Job Corps funding of Federal agencies that operate CCCs are
made by a transfer of obligational authority from DOL to the respective
operating agency.
Subpart D--Recruitment, Eligibility, Screening, Selection and
Assignment, and Enrollment
Sec. 670.400 Who is eligible to participate in the Job Corps program?
To be eligible to participate in the Job Corps, an individual must
be:
(a) At least 16 and not more than 24 years of age at the time of
enrollment, except
(1) There is no upper age limit for an otherwise eligible
individual with a disability; and
(2) Not more than 20% of individuals enrolled nationwide may be
individuals who are aged 22 to 24 years old;
(b) A low-income individual; and
(c) An individual who is facing one or more of the following
barriers to education and employment:
(1) Is basic skills deficient, as defined in WIA section 101(4); or
(2) Is a school dropout; or
(3) Is homeless, or a runaway, or a foster child; or
(4) Is a parent; or
(5) Requires additional education, vocational training, or
intensive counseling and related assistance in order to participate
successfully in regular schoolwork or to secure and hold meaningful
employment.
(d) Meets the requirements of Sec. 670.420, if applicable.
Sec. 670.410 Are there additional factors which are considered in
selecting an eligible applicant for enrollment?
Yes. In accordance with procedures issued by the Secretary, an
eligible applicant may be selected for enrollment, only if:
(a) A determination is made, based on information relating to the
background, needs and interests of the applicant, that the applicant's
educational and vocational needs can best be met through the Job Corps
program;
(b) A determination is made that there is a reasonable expectation
the applicant can participate successfully in group situations and
activities, and is not likely to engage in actions that would
potentially:
(1) Prevent other students from receiving the benefit of the
program;
(2) Be incompatible with the maintenance of sound discipline; or
[[Page 18754]]
(3) Impede satisfactory relationships between the center to which
the student is assigned and surrounding local communities;
(c) The applicant is made aware of the center's rules and what the
consequences are for failure to observe the rules, as described by
procedures issued by the Secretary;
(d) The applicant passes a background check conducted according to
procedures established by the Secretary. The background check must find
that the applicant is not on probation, parole, under a suspended
sentence or under the supervision of any agency as a result of court
action or institutionalization, unless the court or appropriate agency
certifies in writing that it will approve of the applicant's release
from its supervision and that the applicant's release does not violate
applicable laws and regulations. No one will be denied enrollment in
Job Corps solely on the basis of contact with the criminal justice
system. (WIA secs. 145(b)(1)(C) and 145(b)(2).)
(e) Suitable arrangements are made for the care of any dependent
children for the proposed period of enrollment.
Sec. 670.420 Are there any special requirements for enrollment related
to the Military Selective Service Act?
(a) Yes. Each male applicant 18 years of age or older must present
evidence that he has complied with section 3 of the Military Selective
Service Act (50 U.S.C. App. 451 et seq.) if required; and
(b) When a male student turns 18 years of age, he must submit
evidence to the center that he has complied with the requirements of
the Military Selective Service Act (50 U.S.C. App. 451 et seq.).
Sec. 670.430 What entities conduct outreach and admissions activities
for the Job Corps program?
The Regional Director makes arrangements with outreach and
admissions agencies to perform Job Corps recruitment, screening and
admissions functions according to standards and procedures issued by
the Secretary. One-Stop Centers or partners, community action
organizations, private for-profit and non-profit businesses, labor
organizations, or other entities that have contact with youth over
substantial periods of time and are able to offer reliable information
about the needs of youth, conduct outreach and admissions activities.
The Regional Director awards contracts for provision of outreach and
screening services on a competitive basis in accordance with the
requirements in Sec. 670.310 of this part.
Sec. 670.440 What are the responsibilities of outreach and admissions
agencies?
(a) Outreach and admissions agencies are responsible for:
(1) Developing outreach and referral sources;
(2) Actively seeking out potential applicants;
(3) Conducting personal interviews with all applicants to identify
their needs and eligibility status; and
(4) Identifying youth who are interested and likely Job Corps
participants.
(b) Outreach and admissions agencies are responsible for completing
all Job Corps application forms and determining whether applicants meet
the eligibility and selection criteria for participation in Job Corps
as provided in Secs. 670.400 and 670.410 of this subpart.
(c) The Secretary may decide that determinations with regard to one
or more of the eligibility criteria will be made by the Regional
Director.
Sec. 670.450 How are applicants who meet eligibility and selection
criteria assigned to centers?
(a) Each applicant who meets the application and selection
requirements of Sec. 670.400 and Sec. 670.410 is assigned to a center
based on an assignment plan developed by the Secretary. The assignment
plan identifies a target for the maximum percentage of students at each
center who come from the State or region nearest the center, and the
regions surrounding the center. The assignment plan is based on an
analysis of:
(1) The number of eligible individuals in the State and region
where the center is located and the regions surrounding where the
center is located;
(2) The demand for enrollment in Job Corps in the State and region
where the center is located and in surrounding regions; and
(3) The size and enrollment level of the center.
(b) Eligible applicants are assigned to centers closest to their
homes, unless it is determined, based on the special needs of
applicants, including vocational interests and English literacy needs,
the unavailability of openings in the closest center, or parent or
guardian concerns, that another center is more appropriate.
(c) A student who is under the age of 18 must not be assigned to a
center other than the center closest to home if a parent or guardian
objects to the assignment.
Sec. 670.460 What restrictions are there on the assignment of eligible
applicants for nonresidential enrollment in Job Corps?
(a) No more than 20 percent of students enrolled in Job Corps
nationwide may be nonresidential students.
(b) In enrolling individuals who are to be nonresidential students,
priority is given to those eligible individuals who are single parents
with dependent children. (WIA sec 147(b)).
Sec. 670.470 May a person who is determined to be ineligible or an
individual who is denied enrollment appeal that decision?
(a) A person who is determined to be ineligible to participate in
Job Corps under Sec. 670.400 or a person who is not selected for
enrollment under Sec. 670.410 may appeal the determination to the
outreach and admissions agency or to the center, within 60 days of the
determination. The appeal will be resolved according to the procedures
in Secs. 670.990 and 670.991 of this part. If the appeal is denied by
the outreach/admissions contractor or the center, the person may appeal
the decision in writing to the Regional Director within 60 days the
date of the denial. The Regional Director will decide within 60 days
whether to reverse or approve the appealed decision. The decision by
the Regional Director is the Department's final decision.
(b) If an applicant believes that he or she has been determined
ineligible or not selected for enrollment based upon a factor
prohibited by WIA sec. 188, the individual may proceed under the
applicable DOL nondiscrimination regulations implementing WIA sec. 188.
(c) An applicant who is determined to be ineligible or a person who
is denied enrollment must be referred to the appropriate One-Stop
Center or other local service provider.
Sec. 670.480 At what point is an applicant considered to be enrolled
in Job Corps?
(a) To become enrolled as a Job Corps student, an applicant
selected for enrollment must physically arrive at the assigned Job
Corps center on the appointed date. However, applicants selected for
enrollment who arrive at their assigned centers by government furnished
transportation are considered to be enrolled on their dates of
departure by such transportation.
(b) Center operators must document the enrollment of new students
according to procedures issued by the Secretary.
Sec. 670.490 How long can a student be enrolled in Job Corps?
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, a student
may remain
[[Page 18755]]
enrolled in Job Corps for no more than two years.
(b)(1) An extension of a student's enrollment may be authorized in
special cases according to procedures issued by the Secretary; and
(2) A student's enrollment in an advanced career training program
may be extended in order to complete the program for a period not to
exceed one year.
Subpart E--Program Activities and Center Operations
Sec. 670.500 What services must Job Corps centers provide?
(a) Job Corps centers must provide:
(1) Academic, vocational, employability and social skills training;
(2) Work-based learning; and
(3) Recreation, counseling and other residential support services.
(b) In addition, centers must provide students with access to the
core services described in WIA section 134(d)(2) and the intensive
services described in WIA section 134(d)(3).
Sec. 670.505 What types of training must Job Corps centers provide?
(a) Job Corps centers must provide basic education, vocational and
social skills training. The Secretary provides curriculum standards and
guidelines.
(b) Each center must provide students with competency-based or
individualized training in an occupational area that will best
contribute to the students' opportunities for permanent long-term
employment.
(1) Specific vocational training programs offered by individual
centers must be approved by the Regional Director according to policies
issued by the Secretary.
(2) Center industry councils described in Sec. 670.800 of this
part, must review appropriate labor market information, identify
employment opportunities in local areas where students will look for
employment, determine the skills and education necessary for those
jobs, and as appropriate, recommend changes in the center's vocational
training program to the Secretary.
(c) Each center must implement a system to evaluate and track the
progress and achievements of each student at regular intervals.
(d) Each center must develop a training plan that must be available
for review and approval by the appropriate Regional Director.
Sec. 670.510 Are Job Corps center operators responsible for providing
all vocational training?
No. In order to facilitate students' entry into the workforce, the
Secretary may contract with national business, union, or union-
affiliated organizations for vocational training programs at specific
centers. Contractors providing such vocational training will be
selected in accordance with the requirements Sec. 670.310 of this part.
Sec. 670.515 What responsibilities does the center operators have in
managing work-based learning?
(a) The center operator must emphasize and implement work-based
learning programs for students through center program activities,
including vocational skills training, and through arrangements with
employers. Work-based learning must be under actual working conditions
and must be designed to enhance the employability, responsibility, and
confidence of the students. Work-based learning usually occurs in
tandem with students' vocational training.
(b) The center operator must ensure that students are assigned only
to workplaces that meet the safety standards described in Sec. 670.935
of this part.
Sec. 670.520 Are students permitted to hold jobs other than work-based
learning opportunities?
Yes. A center operator may authorize a student to participate in
gainful leisure time employment, as long as the employment does not
interfere with required scheduled activities.
Sec. 670.525 What residential support services must Job Corps center
operators provide?
Job Corps center operators must provide the following services
according to procedures issued by the Secretary:
(a) A quality living and learning environment that supports the
overall training program and includes a safe, secure, clean and
attractive physical and social environment, seven days a week, 24 hours
a day;
(b) An ongoing, structured counseling program for students;
(c) Food service, which includes provision of nutritious meals for
students;
(d) Medical services, through provision or coordination of a
wellness program which includes access to basic medical, dental and
mental health services, as described in the Policy and Requirements
Handbook, for all students from the date of enrollment until separation
from the Job Corps program;
(e) A recreation/avocational program;
(f) A student leadership program and an elected student government;
and
(g) A student welfare association for the benefit of all students
that is funded by non-appropriated funds which come from sources such
as snack bars, vending machines, disciplinary fines, and donations, and
is run by an elected student government, with the help of a staff
advisor.
Sec. 670.530 Are Job Corps centers required to maintain a student
accountability system?
Yes. Each Job Corps center must establish and operate an effective
system to account for and document the whereabouts, participation, and
status of students during their Job Corps enrollment. The system must
enable center staff to detect and respond to instances of unauthorized
or unexplained student absence. Each center must operate its student
accountability system according to requirements and procedures issued
by the Secretary.
Sec. 670.535 Are Job Corps centers required to establish behavior
management systems?
(a) Yes. Each Job Corps center must establish and maintain its own
student incentives system to encourage and reward students'
accomplishments.
(b) The Job Corps center must establish and maintain a behavior
management system, according to procedures established by the
Secretary. The behavior management system must include a zero tolerance
policy for violence and drugs policy as described in Sec. 670.540.
Sec. 670.540 What is Job Corps' zero tolerance policy?
(a) Each Job Corps center must have a zero tolerance policy for:
(1) An act of violence as defined in procedures issued by the
Secretary;
(2) Use, sale, or possession of a controlled substance, as defined
at 21 U.S.C. 802;
(3) Abuse of alcohol;
(4) Possession of unauthorized goods; or
(5) Other illegal or disruptive activity.
(b) As part of this policy, all students must be tested for drugs
as a condition of enrollment. (WIA sec. 145(a)(1) and 152(b)(2).)
(c) According to procedures issued by the Secretary, the policy
must specify the offenses that result in the automatic separation of a
student from the Job Corps. The center director is responsible for
determining when there is a violation of a specified offense.
Sec. 670.545 How does Job Corps ensure that students receive due
process in disciplinary actions?
The center operator must ensure that all students receive due
process in
[[Page 18756]]
disciplinary proceedings according to procedures developed by the
Secretary. These procedures must include, at a minimum, center fact-
finding and behavior review boards, the penalty of separation from Job
Corps might be imposed, and procedures for students to appeal a
center's decision to discharge them involuntarily from Job Corps to a
regional appeal board.
Sec. 670.550 What responsibilities do Job Corps centers have in
assisting students with child care needs?
(a) Job Corps centers are responsible for coordinating with
outreach and admissions agencies to assist students with making
arrangements for child care for their dependent children.
(b) Job Corps centers may operate on center child development
programs with the approval of the Secretary.
Sec. 670.555 What are the center's responsibilities in ensuring that
students' religious rights are respected?
(a) Centers must ensure that a student has the right to worship or
not worship as he or she chooses.
(b) Religious services may not be held on-center unless the center
is so isolated that transportation to and from community religious
facilities is impractical.
(c) If religious services are held on-center, no Federal funds may
be paid to those who conduct services. Services may not be confined to
one religious denomination, and centers may not require students to
attend services.
Sec. 670.560 Is Job Corps authorized to conduct pilot and
demonstration projects?
(a) Yes. The Secretary may undertake experimental, research and
demonstration projects related to the Job Corps program according to
WIA section 156.
(b) The Secretary establishes policies and procedures for
conducting such projects.
(c) All studies and evaluations produced or developed with Federal
funds become the property of the United States.
Subpart F--Student Support
Sec. 670.600 Is government-paid transportation provided to Job Corps
students?
Yes. Job Corps provides for the transportation of students between
their homes and centers as described in policies and procedures issued
by the Secretary.
Sec. 670.610 When are students authorized to take leaves of absence
from their Job Corps centers?
Job Corps students are eligible for annual leaves, emergency leaves
and other types of leaves of absence from their assigned centers
according to criteria and requirements that are issued by the
Secretary. Center operators and other service providers must account
for student leave according to procedures issued by the Secretary.
Sec. 670.620 Are Job Corps students eligible to receive cash
allowances and performance bonuses?
(a) Yes. According to criteria and rates that are established by
the Secretary, Job Corps students receive cash living allowances,
performance bonuses, and allotments for care of dependents, and
graduates receive post-separation readjustment allowances and placement
bonuses. The Secretary may provide former students with post-separation
allowances.
(b) In the event of a student's death, any amount due under this
section are paid according to provisions of 5 U.S.C. 5582 relating to
issues such as designation of beneficiary; order of precedence and
related matters.
Sec. 670.630 Are student allowances subject to Federal Payroll Taxes?
Yes. Job Corps student allowances are subject to Federal payroll
tax withholding and social security taxes. Job Corps students are
considered to be Federal employees for purposes of Federal payroll
taxes. (WIA sec. 157(a)(2).)
Sec. 670.640 Are students provided with clothing?
Yes. Job Corps students are provided cash clothing allowances and/
or articles of clothing, including safety clothing, when needed for
their participation in Job Corps and their successful entry into the
work force. Center operators and other service providers must issue
clothing and clothing assistance to students according to rates,
criteria, and procedures that are issued by the Secretary.
Subpart G--Placement and Continued Services
Sec. 670.700 What are Job Corps centers' responsibilities in preparing
students for placement services?
Job Corps centers must test and counsel students to assess their
competencies and capabilities and determine their readiness for
placement.
Sec. 670.710 What placement services will be provided for Job Corps
students?
(a) Job Corps placement services focus on placing program graduates
in:
(1) Full-time jobs that are related to their vocational training
and that pay wages that allow for self-sufficiency;
(2) Higher education; or
(3) Advanced training programs, including apprenticeship programs.
(b) Placement service levels for students may vary, depending on
whether the student is a graduate or a former student.
(c) Procedures relating to placement service levels are issued by
the Secretary.
Sec. 670.720 Who will provide placement services?
The One-Stop system must be used to the fullest extent possible in
placing graduates and former students in jobs. Job Corps placement
agencies provide placement services under a contract or other agreement
with the Department of Labor.
Sec. 670.730 What are the responsibilities of placement agencies?
(a) Placement agencies are responsible for:
(1) Contacting graduates;
(2) Assisting them in improving skills in resume preparation,
interviewing techniques and job search strategies;
(3) Identifying job leads or educational and training opportunities
through coordination with local Workforce Investment Boards, One-Stop
operators and partners, employers, unions and industry organizations;
and
(4) Placing graduates in jobs, apprenticeship, the Armed Forces, or
higher education or training, or referring former students for
additional services in their local communities as appropriate.
Placement services may be provided for former students according to
procedures issued by the Secretary.
(b) Placement agencies must record and submit all Job Corps
placement information according to procedures established by the
Secretary.
Sec. 670.740 Must continued services be provided for graduates?
Yes. According to procedures issued by the Secretary, continued
services, including transition support and workplace counseling, must
be provided to program graduates for 12 months after graduation.
Sec. 670.750 Who may provide continued services for graduates?
Placement agencies, centers or other agencies, including One-Stop
partners, may provide post-program services under a contract or other
agreement
[[Page 18757]]
with the Regional Director. In selecting a provider for continued
services, priority is given to One-Stop partners. (WIA sec. 148(d)).
Sec. 670.760 How will Job Corps coordinate with other agencies?
(a) The Secretary issues guidelines for the National Office,
Regional Offices, Job Corps centers and operational support providers
to use in developing and maintaining cooperative relationships with
other agencies and institutions, including law enforcement, educational
institutions, communities, and other employment and training programs
and agencies.
(b) The Secretary develops polices and requirements to ensure
linkages with the One-Stop delivery system to the greatest extent
practicable, as well as with other Federal, State, and local programs,
and youth programs funded under this title. These linkages enhance
services to youth who face multiple barriers to employment and must
include, where appropriate:
(1) Referrals of applicants and students;
(2) Participant assessment;
(3) Pre-employment and work maturity skills training;
(4) Work-based learning;
(5) Job search, occupational, and basic skills training; and
(6) Provision of continued services for graduates.
Subpart H--Community Connections
Sec. 670.800 How do Job Corps centers and service providers become
involved in their local communities?
(a) Job Corps representatives serve on Youth Councils operating
under applicable Local Boards wherever geographically feasible.
(b) Each Job Corps center must have a Business and Community
Liaison designated by the director of the center to establish
relationships with local and distant employers, applicable One-Stop
centers and local boards, and members of the community according to
procedures established by the Secretary. (WIA sec. 153(a).)
(c) Each Job Corps center must implement an active community
relations program.
(d) Each Job Corps center must establish an industry advisory
council, according to procedures established by the Secretary. The
industry advisory council must include:
(1) Distant and local employers;
(2) Representatives of labor organizations (where present) and
employees; and
(3) Job Corps students and graduates.
(e) A majority of the council members must be local and distant
business owners, chief executives or chief operating officers of
nongovernmental employers or other private sector employers, who have
substantial management, hiring or policy responsibility and who
represent businesses with employment opportunities in the local area
and the areas to which students will return.
(f) The council must work with Local Boards and must review labor
market information to provide recommendations to the Secretary
regarding the center's vocational training offerings, including
identification of emerging occupations suitable for training. (WIA
sec.154(b)(1).)
(g) Job Corps is identified as a required One-Stop partner.
Wherever practicable, Job Corps centers and operational support
contractors must establish cooperative relationships and partnerships
with One-Stop centers and other One-Stop partners, Local Boards, and
other programs for youth.
Subpart I--Administrative and Management Provisions
Sec. 670.900 Are damages caused by students eligible for reimbursement
under the Tort Claims Act?
Yes. Students are considered Federal employees for purposes of the
Tort Claims Act (28 U.S.C. 2671 (et seq.). If a student is alleged to
be involved in the damage, loss, or destruction of the property of
others, or in causing personal injury to or the death of another
individual(s), the injured person(s), or their agent may file a claim
with the Center Director. Director must investigate all of the facts,
including accident and medical reports, and interview witnesses, and
submit the claim for a decision to the Regional Solicitor's Office. All
tort claims for $25,000 or more must be sent to the Associate Solicitor
for Employee Benefits, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20210.
Sec. 670.905 Are damages that occur to private parties at Job Corps
Centers eligible for reimbursement under the Tort Claims Act?
(a) Whenever there is loss or damage to persons or property, which
is believed to have resulted from operation of a Job Corps center and
to be a proper charge against the Federal Government, the owner(s) of
the property, the injured person(s), or their agent may submit a claim
for the damage to the Regional Solicitor. Claims must be filed no later
than two years from the date of loss or damage. The Regional Solicitor
will determine if the claim is valid under the Tort Claims Act. If the
Regional Solicitor determines a claim is not valid under the Tort
Claims Act, the Regional Solicitor must consider the facts and may
still settle the claim, in an amount not to exceed $1,500.
(b) The Job Corps may pay students for valid claims under the Tort
Claims Act for lost, damaged, or stolen property, up to a maximum
amount set by the Secretary, when the loss is not due to the negligence
of the student. Students must file claims no later than six months from
the date of loss. Students are compensated for losses including those
that result from a natural disaster or those that occur when the
student's property is in the protective custody of the Job Corps, such
as when the student is AWOL. Claims must be filed with Job Corps
regional offices. The regional office will promptly notify the student
and the center of its determination.
Sec. 670.910 Are students entitled to Federal Employees Compensation
Benefits?
(a) Job Corps students are considered Federal employees for
purposes of the Federal Employees Compensation Act (FECA). (WIA sec.
157(a)(3).)
(b) Job Corps students may be entitled to Federal Employees
Compensation Benefits as specified in (WIA sec. 157.)
(c) Job Corps students must meet the same eligibility tests for
FECA payments that apply to all other Federal employees. One of those
tests is that the injury must occur ``in the performance of duty.''
This test is described in Sec. 670.915.
Sec. 670.915 When are residential students considered to be in the
performance of duty?
Residential students will be considered to be in the ``performance
of duty'' at all times while:
(a) They are on center under the supervision and control of Job
Corps officials;
(b) They are engaged in any authorized Job Corps activity;
(c) They are in authorized travel status; or
(d) They are engaged in any authorized offsite activity.
Sec. 670.920 When are non-resident students considered to be in the
performance of duty?
Non-resident students are considered ``in performance of duty'' as
Federal employees when they are engaged in any authorized Job Corps
activity, from the time they arrive at any scheduled center activity
until they leave the activity. The standard rules governing
[[Page 18758]]
coverage of Federal employees during travel to and from work apply.
These rules are described in guidance issued by the Secretary.
Sec. 670.925 When are students considered to be not in the performance
of duty?
Students are considered to be not in the performance of duty when:
(a) They are AWOL;
(b) They are at home, whether on pass or on leave;
(c) They are engaged in an unauthorized offsite activity; or
(d) They are injured or ill due to their own:
(1) Willful misconduct;
(2) Intent to cause injury or death to oneself or another; or
(3) By intoxication or drugs.
Sec. 670.930 How are FECA benefits computed?
(a) FECA benefits for disability or death are computed using the
entrance salary for a grade GS-2 as the student's monthly pay.
(b) The provisions of 5 U.S.C. 8113 (a) and (b), relating to
compensation for work injuries apply to students. Compensation for
disability will not begin to accrue until the day following the date on
which the injured student completes his or her Job Corps separation.
(c) Whenever a student is injured, develops an occupationally
related illness, or dies while in the performance of duty, the
procedures in the DOL Employment Standards Administration regulations,
at 20 CFR ch. I, must be followed. A thorough investigation of the
circumstances and a medical evaluation must be completed and required
forms must be timely filed by the center operator with the DOL Office
of Workers' Compensation Programs.
Sec. 670.935 How will students be protected from unsafe or unhealthy
situations?
(a) The Secretary establishes procedures to ensure that students
are not required or permitted to work, be trained, reside in, or
receive services in buildings or surroundings or under conditions that
are unsanitary or hazardous. Whenever students are employed or in
training for jobs, they must be assigned only to jobs or training which
observe applicable Federal, State and local health and safety
standards.
(b) The Secretary develops procedures to ensure compliance with
applicable DOL Occupational Safety and Health Administration
regulations.
Sec. 670.940 What are the requirements relating to criminal law
enforcement jurisdiction on center property?
(a) All Job Corps property which would otherwise be under exclusive
Federal legislative jurisdiction is considered under concurrent
jurisdiction with the appropriate State and locality with respect to
criminal law enforcement. Concurrent jurisdiction extends to all
portions of the property, including housing and recreational
facilities, in addition to the portions of the property used for
education and training activities.
(b) Centers located on property under concurrent Federal-State
jurisdiction must establish agreements with Federal, State and local
law enforcement agencies to enforce criminal laws.
(c) The Secretary develops procedures to ensure that any searches
of a student's person, personal area or belongings for unauthorized
goods follow applicable right-to-privacy laws.
Sec. 670.945 Are Job Corps operators and service providers authorized
to pay State or local taxes on gross receipts?
(a) A private for-profit or a nonprofit Job Corps service provider
is not liable, directly or indirectly, to any State or subdivision for
any gross receipts taxes, business privilege taxes measured by gross
receipts, or any similar taxes in connection with any payments made to
or by such service provider for operating a center or other Job Corps
program or activity. The service provider is not liable to any State or
subdivision to collect or pay any sales, excise, use, or similar tax
imposed upon the sale to or use by such deliverer of any property,
service, or other item in connection with the operation of a center or
other Job Corps program or activity. (WIA sec. 158(d).)
(b) If a State or local authority compels a center operator or
other service provider to pay such taxes, the center operator or
service provider may pay the taxes with Federal funds, but must
document and report the State or local requirement according to
procedures issued by the Secretary.
Sec. 670.950 What are the financial management responsibilities of Job
Corps center operators and other service providers?
(a) Center operators and other service providers must manage Job
Corps funds using financial management information systems that meet
the specifications and requirements of the Secretary.
(b) These financial management information systems must:
(1) Provide accurate, complete, and current disclosures of the
costs of their Job Corps activities;
(2) Ensure that expenditures of funds are necessary, reasonable,
allocable and allowable in accordance with applicable cost principles;
(3) Use account structures specified by the Secretary;
(4) Ensure the ability to comply with cost reporting requirements
and procedures issued by the Secretary; and
(5) Maintain sufficient cost data for effective planning,
monitoring, and evaluation of program activities and for determining
the allowability of reported costs.
Sec. 670.955 Are Center Operators and Service Providers Subject to
Federal Audits?
(a) Yes. Center operators and service providers are subject to
Federal audits.
(b) The Secretary arranges for the survey, audit, or evaluation of
each Job Corps center and service provider at least once every three
years, by Federal auditors or independent public accountants. The
Secretary may arrange for more frequent audits. (WIA sec. 159(b)(2).)
(c) Center operators and other service providers are responsible
for giving full cooperation and access to books, documents, papers and
records to duly appointed Federal auditors and evaluators. (WIA sec.
159(b)(1).)
Sec. 670.960 What are the procedures for management of student
records?
The Secretary issues guidelines for a system of maintaining records
for each student during enrollment and for disposition of such records
after separation.
Sec. 670.965 What procedures apply to disclosure of information about
Job Corps students and program activities?
(a) The Secretary develops procedures to respond to requests for
information or records or other necessary disclosures pertaining to
students.
(b) DOL disclosure of Job Corps information must be handled
according to the Freedom of Information Act and according to DOL
regulations at 29 CFR part 70.
(c) Job Corps contractors are not ``agencies'' for Freedom of
Information Act purposes. Therefore, their records are not subject to
disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act or 29 CFR part 70.
(d) The regulations at 29 CFR Part 70a apply to a system of records
covered by the Privacy Act of 1974 maintained by DOL or to a similar
system maintained by a contractor, such as a screening agency, contract
center operator, or placement agency on behalf of the Job Corps.
Sec. 670.970 What are the reporting requirements for center operators
and operational support service providers?
The Secretary establishes procedures to ensure the timely and
complete
[[Page 18759]]
reporting of necessary financial and program information to maintain
accountability. Center operators and operational support service
providers are responsible for the accuracy and integrity of all reports
and data they provide.
Sec. 670.975 How will performance of the Job Corps program be
assessed?
The performance of the Job Corps program as a whole, and the
performance of individual program components, is assessed on an ongoing
basis, in accordance with these regulations and procedures and
standards, including a national performance measurement system, issued
by the Secretary. Annual performance assessments are done for each
center operator and other service providers, including screening and
admissions and placement agencies.
Sec. 670.980 What are the indicators of performance for Job Corps?
(a) At a minimum, the performance assessment system established
under Sec. 670.975 of this subpart will include expected levels of
performance established for each of the indicators of performance
contained in WIA section 159(c). These are:
(1) The number of graduates and rate of graduation, analyzed by the
type of vocational training received and the training provider;
(2) The job placement rate of graduates into unsubsidized
employment, analyzed by the vocational training received, whether or
not the job placement is related to the training received, the
vocational training provider, and whether the placement is made by a
local or national service provider;
(3) The average placement wage of graduates in training-related and
non-training related unsubsidized jobs;
(4) The average wage of graduates on the first day of employment
and at 6 and 12 months following placement, analyzed by the type of
vocational training received;
(5) The number of and retention rate of graduates in unsubsidized
employment after 6 and 12 months ;
(6) The number of graduates who entered unsubsidized employment for
32 hours per week or more, for 20 to 32 hours per week, and for less
than 20 hours per week.
(7) The number of graduates placed in higher education or advanced
training; and
(8) The number of graduates who attained job readiness and
employment skills.
(b) The Secretary issues the expected levels of performance for
each indicator. To the extent practicable, the levels of performance
will be continuous and consistent from year to year.
Sec. 670.985 What happens if a center operator, screening and
admissions contractor or other service provider fails to meet the
expected levels of performance?
(a) The Secretary takes appropriate action to address performance
issues through a specific performance plan.
(b)The plan may include the following actions:
(1) Providing technical assistance to a Job Corps center operator
or support service provider, including a screening and admissions
contractor;
(2) Changing the management staff of a center;
(3) Changing the vocational training offered at a center;
(4) Contracting out or recompeting the contract for a center or
operational support service provider;
(5) Reducing the capacity of a Job Corps center;
(6) Relocating a Job Corps center; or
(7) Closing a Job Corps center. (WIA sec. 159(f).)
Sec. 670.990 What procedures are available to resolve complaints and
disputes?
(a) Each Job Corps center operator and service provider must
establish and maintain a grievance procedure for filing complaints and
resolving disputes from applicants, students and/or other interested
parties about its programs and activities. A hearing on each complaint
or dispute must be conducted within 30 days of the filing of the
complaint or dispute. A decision on the complaint must be made by the
center operator or service provider, as appropriate, within 60 days
after the filing of the complaint, and a copy of the decision must be
immediately served, by first-class mail, on the complainant and any
other party to the complaint. Except for complaints under Sec. 670.470
of this part or complaints alleging fraud or other criminal activity,
complaints may be filed within one year of the occurrence that led to
the complaint.
(b) The procedure established under paragraph (a) of this section
must include procedures to process complaints alleging violations of
WIA section 188, consistent with DOL nondiscrimination regulations
implementing WIA section 188 and Sec. 670.995 of this subpart.
Sec. 670.991 How does Job Corps ensure that complaints or disputes are
resolved in a timely fashion?
(a) If a complaint is not resolved by the center operator or
service provider in the time frames described in Sec. 670.990 of this
subpart, the person making the complaint may request that the Regional
Director determine whether reasonable cause exists to believe that the
Act or regulations for this part of the Act have been violated. The
request must be filed with the Regional Director within 60 days from
the date that the center operator or service provider should have
issued the decision.
(b) Following the receipt of a request for review under paragraph
(a) of this section, the Regional Director must determine within 60
days whether there has been a violation of the Act or these
regulations. If the Regional Director determines that there has been a
violation of the Act or Regulations, (s)he may direct the operator or
service provider to remedy the violation or direct the service provider
to issue a decision to resolve the dispute according to the service
provider's grievance procedures. If the service provider does not
comply with the Regional Director's decision within 30 days, the
Regional Director may impose a sanction on the center operator or
service provider for violating the Act or regulations, and/or for
failing to issue a decision. Decisions imposing sanctions upon a center
operator or service provider may be appealed to the DOL Office of
Administrative Law Judges under 20 CFR 667.800 or 667.840.
Sec. 670.992 How does Job Corps ensure that centers or other service
providers comply with the Act and regulations?
(a) If DOL receives a complaint or has reason to believe that a
center or other service provider is failing to comply with the
requirements of the Act or regulations, the Regional Director must
investigate the allegation and determine within 90 days after receiving
the complaint or otherwise learning of the alleged violation, whether
such allegation or complaint is true.
(b) As a result of such a determination, the Regional Director may:
(1) Direct the center operator or service provider to handle a
complaint through the grievance procedures established under
Sec. 670.990 of this subpart; or
(2) Investigate and determine whether the center operator or
service provider is in compliance with the Act and regulations. If the
Regional Director determines that the center or service provider is not
in compliance with the Act or regulations, the Regional Director may
take action to resolve the complaint under Sec. 670.991(b) of this
subpart, or will report the incident to the DOL
[[Page 18760]]
Office of the Inspector General, as described in 20 CFR 667.630.
Sec. 670.993 How does Job Corps ensure that contract disputes will be
resolved?
A dispute between DOL and a Job Corps contractor will be handled
according to the Contract Disputes Act and applicable regulations.
Sec. 670.994 How does Job Corps resolve disputes between DOL and other
Federal Agencies?
Disputes between DOL and a Federal Agency operating a center will
he handled according to the interagency agreement with the agency which
is operating the center.
Sec. 670.995 What DOL equal opportunity and nondiscrimination
regulations apply to Job Corps?
Nondiscrimination requirements, procedures, complaint processing,
and compliance reviews are governed by, as applicable, provisions of
the following Department of Labor regulations:
(a) Regulations implementing WIA section 188 for programs receiving
Federal financial assistance under WIA.
(b) 29 CFR part 33 for programs conducted by the Department of
Labor; and
(c) 41 CFR chapter 60 for entities that have a Federal government
contract.
PART 671--NATIONAL EMERGENCY GRANTS FOR DISLOCATED WORKERS
Sec.
671.100 What is the purpose of national emergency grants under WIA
section 173?
671.105 What funds are available for national emergency grants?
671.110 What are major economic dislocations or other events which
may qualify for a national emergency grant?
671.120 Who is eligible to apply for national emergency grants?
671.125 What are the requirements for submitting applications for
national emergency grants?
671.130 When should applications for national emergency grants be
submitted to the Department?
671.140 What are the allowable activities and what dislocated
workers may be served under national emergency grants?
671.150 How do statutory and workflex waivers apply to national
emergency grants?
671.160 What rapid response activities are required before a
national emergency grant application is submitted ?
671.170 What are the program and administrative requirements that
apply to national emergency grants?
Authority: Sec. 506(c), Pub. L. 105-220; 20 U.S.C. 9276(c).
Sec. 671.100 What is the purpose of national emergency grants under
WIA section 173?
The purpose of national emergency grants is to provide supplemental
dislocated worker funds to States, Local Boards and other eligible
entities in order to respond to the needs of dislocated workers and
communities affected by major economic dislocations and other worker
dislocation events which cannot be met with formula allotments.
Sec. 671.105 What funds are available for national emergency grants?
The Secretary uses funds reserved under WIA section 132(a)(2)(A) to
provide financial assistance to eligible applicant for grants under WIA
section 173.
Sec. 671.110 What are major economic dislocations or other events
which may qualify for a national emergency grant?
These include:
(a) Plant closures;
(b) Mass layoffs affecting 50 or more workers at a single site of
employment;
(c) Closures and realignments of military installations;
(d) Multiple layoffs in a single local community that have
significantly increased the total number of unemployed individuals in a
community;
(e) Emergencies or natural disasters, as defined in paragraphs (1)
and (2) respectively, of section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122(1) and (2)) which
have been declared eligible for public assistance by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA); and
(f) Other events, as determined by the Secretary.
Sec. 671.120 Who is eligible to apply for national emergency grants?
(a) For projects within a State. A State, a Local Board or another
entity determined to be appropriate by the Governor of the State in
which the project will be located may apply for a national emergency
grant. Also, Indian tribes, tribal organizations, Alaska Native
entities, Indian-controlled organizations serving Indians, or Native
Hawaiian organizations which are recipients of funds under section 166
of the Act (Indian and Native American Programs) may apply for a
national emergency grant.
(b) For inter-State projects. Consortia of States and/or Local
Boards may apply. Other private entities which can demonstrate, in the
application for assistance, that they possess unique capabilities to
effectively respond to the circumstances of the major economic
dislocation(s) covered in the application may apply.
(c) Other entities. The Secretary may consider applications from
other entities, to ensure that appropriate assistance is provided in
response to major economic dislocations.
Sec. 671.125 What are the requirements for submitting applications for
national emergency grants?
The Department publishes instructions for submitting applications
for National Emergency Grants in the Federal Register. The instructions
specify application procedures, selection criteria and the approval
process.
Sec. 671.130 When should applications for national emergency grants be
submitted to the Department?
(a) Applications for national emergency grants to respond to mass
layoffs and plant closures may be submitted to the Department as soon
as:
(1) The State receives a notification of a mass layoff or a closure
as a result of a WARN notice, a general announcement or some other
means determined by the Governor to be sufficient to respond;
(2) Rapid response assistance has been initiated; and
(3) A determination has been made, in collaboration with the
applicable Local Board(s) and chief elected official(s), that State and
local formula dislocated worker funds are inadequate to provide the
level of services needed by the workers being laid off.
(b) An eligible entity may apply for a national emergency grant at
any time during the year.
(c) Applications for national emergency grants to respond to a
declared emergency or natural disaster as described in Sec. 671.110(e)
of this subpart, cannot be considered until FEMA has declared that the
affected area is eligible for disaster-related public assistance.
Sec. 671.140 What are the allowable activities and what dislocated
workers may be served under national emergency grants?
(a) National emergency grants may provide adjustment assistance for
eligible dislocated workers, described at WIA section 173(c)(2) or
(d)(2).
(b) Adjustment assistance includes the core, intensive, and
training services authorized at WIA sections 134(d) and 173. The scope
of services to be provided in a particular project are negotiated
between the Department and the grantee, taking into account the needs
of the target population covered by the grant. The scope of services
may
[[Page 18761]]
be changed through grant modifications, if necessary.
(c) National emergency grants may provide for supportive services
to help workers who require such assistance to participate in
activities provided for in the grant. Needs-related payments, in
support of other employment and training assistance, may be available
for the purpose of enabling dislocated workers who are eligible for
such payments to participate in programs of training services.
Generally, the terms of a grant must be consistent with Local Board
policies regarding such financial assistance with formula funds
(including the payment levels and duration of payments). However, the
terms of the grant agreement may diverge from established Local Board
policies, for example:
(1) If unemployed dislocated workers served by the project are not
able to meet the 13 or 8 weeks enrollment in training requirement at
WIA section 134(e)(3)(B) because of the lack of formula or emergency
grant funds in the State or local area at the time of dislocation, such
individuals may be eligible for needs-related payments if they are
enrolled in training by the end of the 6th week following the date of
the emergency grant award; and
(2) Trade-impacted workers who are not eligible for trade
readjustment assistance under NAFTA-TAA may be eligible for needs-
related payments under a national emergency grant if the worker is
enrolled in training by the end of the 16th week following layoff.
(d) A national emergency grant to respond to a declared emergency
or natural disaster, as defined at Sec. 671.110(e) of this subpart, may
provide short-term disaster relief employment for:
(1) Individuals who are temporarily or permanently laid off as a
consequence of the disaster;
(2) Dislocated workers; and
(3) Long-term unemployed individuals.
(e) Temporary employment assistance is authorized on disaster
projects that provide food, clothing, shelter and other humanitarian
assistance for disaster victims; and on projects that perform
demolition, cleaning, repair, renovation and reconstruction of damaged
and destroyed structures, facilities and lands located within the
disaster area. For such temporary jobs, each eligible worker is limited
to no more than six months of employment for each single disaster. The
amounts, duration and other limitations on wages will be negotiated for
each grant.
(f) Additional requirements that apply to national emergency
grants, including natural disaster grants, are contained in the
application instructions.
Sec. 671.150 How do statutory and workflex waivers apply to national
emergency grants?
(a) Application of existing general statutory or regulatory waivers
and workflex waivers to National Emergency Grants may be requested by
State and Local Board grantees, and approved by the Department for a
National Emergency Grant award. The application for grant funds must
describe any statutory waivers which the applicant wishes to apply to
the project that the State and Local Board, as applicable, have been
granted under its waiver plan, or that the State has approved for
implementation in the applicable local area under workflex waivers. The
Department considers such requests as part of the overall application
review and decision process.
(b) If, during the operation of the project, the grantee wishes to
apply a waiver not identified in the application, the grantee must
request a modification which includes the provision to be waived, the
operational barrier to be removed and the effect upon the outcome of
the project.
Sec. 671.160 What rapid response activities are required before a
national emergency grant application is submitted?
(a) Rapid response is a required Statewide activity under WIA
section 134(a)(2)(A), to be carried out by the State or its designee in
collaboration with the Local Board(s) and chief elected official(s).
Pursuant to 20 CFR 665.310, rapid response encompasses, among other
activities, an assessment of the general needs of the affected workers
and the resources available to them.
(b) In accordance with national emergency grant application
guidelines published by the Department, each applicant must demonstrate
that:
(1) The rapid response activities described in 20 CFR 665.310 have
been initiated and carried out, or are in the process of being carried
out;
(2) State and local funds, including those made available under
section 132(b)(2)(B) of the Act, have been used to initiate appropriate
services to the eligible workers;
(3) There is a need for additional funds to effectively respond to
the assistance needs of the workers and, in the case of declared
emergencies and natural disasters, the community; and
(4) The application has been developed by or in conjunction with
the Local Board(s) and chief elected official(s) of the local area(s)
in which the proposed project is to operate.
Sec. 671.170 What are the program and administrative requirements that
apply to national emergency grants?
(a) In general, the program requirements and administrative
standards set forth at 20 CFR parts 663 and 667 will apply.
(b) Exceptions include:
(1) Funds provided in response to a natural disaster may be used
for temporary job creation in areas declared eligible for public
assistance by FEMA, subject to the limitations of WIA section 173(d),
this subpart and the application guidelines issued by the Department;
(2) National emergency grant funds may be used to pay an
appropriate level of administrative costs based on the design and
complexity of the project. Administration costs are negotiated between
the applicant and the Department as part of the application review and
grant award and modification processes;
(3) The period of availability for expenditure of funds under a
national emergency grant is specified in the grant agreement.
(4) The Secretary may establish supplemental reporting, monitoring
and oversight requirements for national emergency grants. The
requirements will be identified in the grant application instructions
or the grant document.
(5) The Secretary may negotiate and fund projects under terms other
than those specified in this subpart where it can be clearly
demonstrated that such adjustments will achieve a greater positive
benefit for the workers and/or communities being assisted.
PART 652--ESTABLISHMENT AND FUNCTIONING OF STATE EMPLOYMENT
SERVICES
1. The authority citation for part 652 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 49k.
2. Section 652.1 is amended by revising paragraph (a), and in
paragraph (b), by adding the definition of State Workforce Investment
Board (State Board) and the definition of WIA, by revising the
definition of State agency, and by removing the definition of Director,
to read as follows:
Sec. 652.1 Introduction and definitions.
(a) These regulations implement the provisions of the Wagner-Peyser
Act, known hereafter as the Act, as amended by the Workforce Investment
Act of 1998 (WIA). Congress intended that the States exercise broad
authority in implementing provisions of the Act.
[[Page 18762]]
(b) * * *
State Agency means the State governmental unit designated under
section 4 of the Act to cooperate with the Secretary in the operation
of the public employment service system.
State Workforce Investment Board (State Board) means the entity
within a State appointed by the Governor under section 111 of the
Workforce Investment Act.
WIA means the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (29 U.S.C. 2801 et
seq.).
3. Section 652.3 is amended by revising paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
Sec. 652.3 Basic labor exchange system.
* * * * *
(d) To participate in a system for clearing labor between the
States, including the use of standardized classification systems issued
by the Secretary, under section 15 of the Act; and.
* * * * *
4. Section 652.5 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 652.5 Services authorized.
The sums allotted to each State pursuant to section 6 of the Act
shall be expended consistent with an approved plan under 20 CFR
660.100-660.104 and Secs. 652.222-214 of this part. At a minimum, each
State shall provide the basic labor exchange elements at Sec. 652.3 of
this part.
Secs. 652.6 and 652.7 [Removed and reserved]
5. Sections 652.6 and 652.7 are removed and reserved.
Sec. 652.8 [Amended]
6. Section 652.8 is amended in paragraph (j)(1) by removing the
phrase ``29 CFR part 31.'' and adding ``the applicable DOL
nondiscrimination regulations.'' and in paragraph (j)(5) by removing
the phrase ``the provisions of 29 CFR parts 31 and 32.'' and adding
``the applicable DOL nondiscrimination regulations.''
7. Subpart C is added to read as follows:
Subpart C--Wagner-Peyser Act Services in a One-Stop Delivery System
Environment
Sec.
652.200 What is the purpose of this subpart?
652.201 What is the role of the State Agency in the One-Stop
delivery system?
652.202 May local Employment Service Offices exist outside the One-
Stop delivery system?
652.203 Who is responsible for funds authorized under the Act in
the workforce investment system?
652.204 Must funds authorized under section 7(b) of the Act (the
Governor's reserve) flow through the One-Stop delivery system?
652.205 May funds authorized under the Act be used to supplement
funding for labor exchange programs authorized under separate
legislation?
652.206 May a State use funds authorized under the Act to provide
``core services'' and ``intensive services'' as defined in WIA?
652.207 How does a State meet the requirement for universal access
to services provided under the Act?
652.208 How are core services and intensive services related to the
methods of service delivery described in Sec. 652.207(b)(2)?
652.209 What are the requirements under the Act for providing
reemployment services to referred UI claimants?
652.210 What are the Act's requirements for administration of the
work test and assistance to UI claimants?
652.211 What are State planning requirements under the Act?
652.212 When should a State submit modifications to the five-year
plan?
652.213 What information must a State include when the plan is
modified?
652.214 How often may a State submit modifications to the plan?
652.215 Do any provisions in WIA change the requirement that
publicly funded merit-staff employees must deliver services provided
under the Act?
652.216 May the One-Stop operator provide guidance to a merit-
staffed employee under the Act?
Subpart C--Wagner-Peyser Act in a One-Stop Delivery System
Environment
Sec. 652.200 What is the purpose of this subpart?
(a) This subpart provides guidance to States to implement the
services provided under the Act, as amended by WIA, in a One-Stop
delivery system environment.
(b) Except as otherwise provided, the definitions contained in this
part 652 and section 2 of the Act apply to this subpart.
Sec. 652.201 What is the role of the State Agency in the One-Stop
delivery system?
(a) The role of the State Agency in the One-Stop delivery system is
to ensure the delivery of services authorized under section 7(a) of the
Act. The State Agency is a required One-Stop partner in each local One-
Stop delivery system and is subject to the provisions relating to such
partners that are described at 20 CFR part 662.
(b) Consistent with those provisions, the State agency must:
(1) Participate in the One-Stop delivery system in accordance with
section 7(e) of the Act;
(2) Be represented on the Workforce Investment Boards that oversee
the local and State One-Stop delivery system and be a party to the
Memorandum of Understanding described at 20 CFR 662.300 addressing
operational issues of the One-Stop delivery system; and
(3) Provide these services as part of the One-Stop delivery system.
Sec. 652.202 May local Employment Service Offices exist outside the
One-Stop delivery system?
(a) No.
(b) However, local Employment Service Offices may operate as
affiliated sites, or through electronically or technologically linked
access points as part of the One-Stop delivery system, provided the
following conditions are met:
(1) All labor exchange services are delivered as a part of the
local One-Stop delivery system in accordance with section 7(e) of the
Act;
(2) The services described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section are
available in at least one physical center from which job seekers and
employers can access them; and
(3) The Memorandum of Understanding between the State Agency local
One-Stop partner and the Local Workforce Investment Board meets the
requirements of Sec. 662.300.
Sec. 652.203 Who is responsible for funds authorized under the Act in
the workforce investment system?
The State Agency retains responsibility for all funds authorized
under the Act, including those funds authorized under section 7(a)
required for providing the services and activities delivered as part of
the One-Stop delivery system.
Sec. 652.204 Must funds authorized under section 7(b) of the Act (the
Governor's reserve) flow through the One-Stop delivery system?
No. These funds are reserved for use by the Governor for the three
categories of activities specified in section 7(b) of the Act. However,
these funds may flow through the One-Stop delivery system.
Sec. 652.205 May funds authorized under the Act be used to supplement
funding for labor exchange programs authorized under separate
legislation?
(a) Section 7(c) of the Act enables States to use funds authorized
under section 7(a) or 7(b) of the Act to supplement funding of any
workforce activity carried out under WIA.
(b) Funds authorized under the Act may be used under section 7(c)
to
[[Page 18763]]
provide additional funding to other activities authorized under WIA if:
(1) The activity meets the requirements of the Act, and its own
requirements;
(2) The activity serves the same individuals as are served under
the Act;
(3) The activity provides services that are coordinated with
services under the Act; and
(4) The funds supplement, rather than supplant, funds provided from
non-Federal sources.
Sec. 652.206 May a State use funds authorized under the Act to provide
``core services'' and ``intensive services'' as defined in WIA?
Yes. Funds authorized under section 7(a) of the Act must be used to
provide core services as defined at 20 CFR 663.150 and may be used to
provide intensive services as defined at 20 CFR 663.200. Funds
authorized under section 7(b) of the Act may be used to provide core or
intensive services. Core and intensive services must be provided
consistent with the requirements of the Act.
Sec. 652.207 How does a State meet the requirement for universal
access to services provided under the Act?
(a) A State has discretion in how it meets the requirement for
universal access to services provided under the Act. In exercising this
discretion, a State must meet the Act's requirements.
(b) These requirements are:
(1) Labor exchange services must be available to all employers and
job seekers, including unemployment insurance (UI) claimants, veterans,
migrant and seasonal farm workers, and individuals with disabilities;
(2) The State must have the capacity to deliver labor exchange
services to employers and job seekers, as described in the Act, on a
Statewide basis through:
(i) Self-service,
(ii) Facilitated self-help service; and
(iii) Staff-assisted service;
(3) In each Workforce Investment Area, in at least one physical
center, staff funded under the Act must provide core and applicable
intensive services including staff-assisted labor exchange services.
(4) Those labor exchange services provided under the Act in a
Workforce Investment Area must be described in the Memorandum of
Understanding.
Sec. 652.208 How are core services and intensive services related to
the methods of service delivery described in Sec. 652.207(b)(2)?
Core services and intensive services may be delivered through any
of the three methods of service delivery described in
Sec. 652.207(b)(2). These methods are:
(a) Self-service;
(b) Facilitated self-help services; and
(c) Staff-assisted service.
Sec. 652.209 What are the requirements under the Act for providing
reemployment services to referred UI claimants?
In accordance with section 3(c)(3) of the Act, a State must provide
reemployment services to UI claimants for whom such services are
required as a condition for receipt of UI benefits. The State Agency,
through the One-Stop delivery system, must provide reemployment
services to UI claimants. Services must be appropriate to the needs of
the UI claimants who are referred to reemployment services under any
Federal or State UI law and must be provided to the extent that funds
are available.
Sec. 652.210 What are the Act's requirements for administration of the
work test and assistance to UI claimants?
(a) State UI law or rules establish the requirements under which UI
claimants must register and search for work in order to fulfill the UI
work test requirements.
(b) Staff funded under the Act must assure that:
(1) UI claimants receive the full range of labor exchange services
available under the Act that are necessary and appropriate to
facilitate their earliest return to work;
(2) UI claimants requiring assistance in seeking work receive the
necessary guidance and counseling to ensure they make a meaningful and
realistic work search; and
(3) UI program staff receive information about a UI claimant's
ability or availability for work, or the suitability of work offered to
them.
Sec. 652.211 What are State planning requirements under the Act?
The State Agency designated to administer funds authorized under
the Act must prepare and submit a five-year Statewide plan for the
delivery of services provided under the Act in accordance with WIA
regulations at 20 CFR 661.220. The State Plan must contain a detailed
description of services that will be provided under the Act, which are
adequate and reasonably appropriate for carrying out the provisions of
the Act, including the requirements of section 8(b) of the Act.
Sec. 652.212 When should a State submit modifications to the five-year
plan?
(a) A State has the authority to submit modifications to the five-
year plan as necessary during the five-year period, and to do so in
accordance with the same collaboration, notification, and other
requirements that apply to the original plan. Modifications are likely
to be needed to keep the strategic plan a viable and living document
over its five-year life.
(b) That portion of the plan addressing the Act must be updated to
reflect any reorganization of the State Agency designated to deliver
services under the Act, any change in service delivery strategy, any
change in levels of performance, or any change in services delivered by
public merit-staff employees.
Sec. 652.213 What information must a State include when the plan is
modified?
A State must follow the instructions for modifying the strategic
five-year plan as addressed in 20 CFR 661.230.
Sec. 652.214 How often may a State submit modifications to the plan?
A State may modify its plan as changes occur in Federal or State
law or policies, Statewide vision or strategy, or if changes in
economic conditions occur. A State must submit modifications to adjust
service strategies if performance goals are not met.
Sec. 652.215 Do any provisions in WIA change the requirement that
publicly funded merit-staff employees must deliver services provided
under the Act?
No. The Secretary has the legal authority to set staffing standards
and requirements to ensure the effective delivery of services provided
under the Act. The Secretary requires that labor exchange services
provided under authority of the Act, to include services to veterans,
be provided by public merit-staff employees. This interpretation is
authorized by and consistent with the provisions in sections 3(a) and
5(b) of the Act and the Intergovernmental Personnel Act.
Sec. 652.216 May the One-Stop operator provide guidance to a merit-
staffed employee under the Act?
Yes. The One-Stop system envisions a partnership in which Wagner-
Peyser Act labor exchange services are coordinated with other
activities provided by other partners in a One-Stop setting. As part of
the local Memorandum of Understanding, One-Stop partners may agree to
have staff receive guidance from the One-Stop operator regarding the
provision of labor exchange services. Personnel matters, including
compensation, personnel actions, terms and conditions of employment,
performance appraisals, and accountability of merit-staff employees
funded under the Wagner-
[[Page 18764]]
Peyser Act, remain under the authority of the State Agency (including
such matters that are delegated to any other public agency). Such
guidance given to employees must be consistent with the provisions of
the Wagner-Peyser Act.
[FR Doc. 99-8398 Filed 4-14-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
