2010-8598. Preserved Mushrooms From Chile, China, India, and Indonesia; Determinations  

  • Start Preamble Start Printed Page 19658

    On the basis of the record [1] developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on preserved mushrooms from Chile, China, India, and Indonesia would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.[2]

    Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on October 1, 2009 (74 FR 50818) and determined on January 4, 2010 that it would conduct expedited reviews (75 FR 3756, January 22, 2010).

    The Commission transmitted its determinations in these reviews to the Secretary of Commerce on April 9, 2010. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4135 (April 2010), entitled Preserved Mushrooms from Chile, China, India, and Indonesia: Investigation Nos. 731-TA-776-779 (Second Review).

    Start Signature

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: April 9, 2010.

    William R. Bishop,

    Acting Secretary to the Commission.

    End Signature End Preamble

    Footnotes

    1.  The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR § 207.2(f)).

    Back to Citation

    2.  Vice Chairman Daniel R. Pearson determines that revocation of the antidumping duty order on preserved mushrooms from Indonesia would not be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.

    Back to Citation

    [FR Doc. 2010-8598 Filed 4-14-10; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 7020-02-P

Document Information

Published:
04/15/2010
Department:
International Trade Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
2010-8598
Pages:
19658-19658 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Investigation Nos. 731-TA-776-779 (Second Review)
PDF File:
2010-8598.pdf