97-9797. Efficiency of Private Land Mobile Radio Services  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 73 (Wednesday, April 16, 1997)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Page 18536]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-9797]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
    
    47 CFR Part 90
    
    [PR Docket No. 92-235, DA 97-592]
    
    
    Efficiency of Private Land Mobile Radio Services
    
    AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
    
    ACTION: Final rule; petition for clarification.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: On February 14, 1997, Motorola filed a petition seeking 
    clarification of the Commission's decision in the Memorandum Opinion 
    and Order in PR Docket 92-235, FCC 96-492 (released Dec. 30, 1996) 
    (Refarming MO&O). Specifically, Motorola notes that the Refarming MO&O 
    allows frequency coordinators to recommend frequencies inconsistent 
    with the adopted band plan, provided that such a system will not cause 
    harmful interference to any existing system. This action seeks public 
    comment on Motorola's petition.
    
    DATES: Comments are due May 2, 1997; reply comments are due May 12, 
    1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: All comments should be filed with the Office of Secretary, 
    Federal Communications Commission, 1919 M Street, N.W., Room 222, 
    Washington, DC 20554. A copy of each filing should be sent to 
    International Transcription Service, Inc. (ITS), 2100 M Street, N.W., 
    Suite 140, Washington, D.C. 20037, (202) 857-3800 and Ira Keltz, 
    Federal Communications Commission, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 
    Private Wireless Division, 2025 M Street, N.W., Room 8119, Washington, 
    D.C. 20554.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ira Keltz of the Wireless 
    Telecommunications Bureau at (202) 418-0616 or via E-Mail to 
    mayday@fcc.gov.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Public 
    Notice released April 10, 1997.
        1. On February 14, 1997, Motorola filed a petition seeking 
    clarification of the Commission's decision in the Memorandum Opinion 
    and Order in PR Docket 92-235, FCC 96-492 (released Dec. 30, 1996) 
    (Refarming MO&O) (62 FR 2027, January 15, 1997). Specifically, Motorola 
    notes that the Refarming MO&O allows frequency coordinators to 
    recommend frequencies inconsistent with the adopted band plan, provided 
    that such a system will not cause harmful interference to any existing 
    system. For example, a frequency coordinator could recommend approval 
    of applications for 5 kHz channels within a user's existing 25 kHz 
    assignment, even though such applications would be inconsistent with 
    the channel plan adopted in this proceeding (which calls for 6.25/7.5 
    kHz channel spacing). This policy was designed to increase the 
    efficient use of the spectrum.\1\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ Replacement of Part 90 by Part 88 to Revise the Private Land 
    Mobile Radio Services and Modify the Policies Governing Them and 
    Examination of Exclusivity and Frequency Assignment Policies of the 
    Private Land Mobile Radio Services and Amendment of the Commission's 
    Rules Concerning Maritime Communications, PR Docket Nos. 92-235 and 
    92-257, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 17676 (1996) at 
    para. 11.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        2. Although supportive of this policy, Motorola notes that 
    implementing this flexibility for ``any technology'' may be constrained 
    by other Commission regulations. For example, Motorola observes that a 
    user who seeks to double the capacity of its system by implementing two 
    12.5 kHz channels within its existing 25 kHz assignment would have to 
    use the channel centers that are 6.25 kHz removed from its existing 
    channel center. This type of operation, however, is prohibited because 
    these channels are restricted to emissions of 6.0 kHz or less. Motorola 
    asks that the Commission clarify its policy to allow the described 
    operation, thereby achieving a consistent policy of technological 
    neutrality and encouraging migration from existing equipment to more 
    efficient technologies.
        3. The full text of the petition, comments, and reply comments are 
    available for inspection and duplication during regular business hours 
    in the Private Wireless Division of the Wireless Telecommunications 
    Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 2025 M Street, N.W., Room 
    8010, Washington, D.C. 20554. Copies may also be obtained from 
    International Transcription Service, Inc. (ITS), 2100 M Street, N.W., 
    Suite 140, Washington, D.C. 20037, (202) 857-3800.
    
    Federal Communications Commission.
    William F. Caton,
    Acting Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 97-9797 Filed 4-15-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/16/1997
Department:
Federal Communications Commission
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule; petition for clarification.
Document Number:
97-9797
Dates:
Comments are due May 2, 1997; reply comments are due May 12, 1997.
Pages:
18536-18536 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
PR Docket No. 92-235, DA 97-592
PDF File:
97-9797.pdf
CFR: (1)
47 CFR 90