98-10168. Certain Welded Carbon Steel Pipe and Tube and Welded Carbon Steel Line Pipe From Turkey; Final Results and Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 73 (Thursday, April 16, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 18885-18891]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-10168]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    
    International Trade Administration
    [C-489-502]
    
    
    Certain Welded Carbon Steel Pipe and Tube and Welded Carbon Steel 
    Line Pipe From Turkey; Final Results and Partial Rescission of 
    Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews
    
    AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
    Department of Commerce.
    
    ACTION: Notice of final results of countervailing duty administrative 
    reviews.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: On December 9, 1997, the Department of Commerce published in 
    the Federal Register its preliminary results of administrative reviews 
    of the countervailing duty orders on certain welded carbon steel pipe 
    and tube and welded carbon steel line pipe from Turkey for the period 
    January 1, 1996 through December 31, 1996 (62 FR 64808). The Department 
    has now completed these administrative reviews in accordance with 
    section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. For information 
    on the net subsidy for each reviewed company, and for all non-reviewed 
    companies, please see the Final Results of Reviews section of this 
    notice. We will instruct the U.S. Customs Service to assess 
    countervailing duties as detailed in the Final Results of Reviews 
    section of this notice.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: April 16, 1998.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephanie Moore or Maria MacKay, 
    Office of CVD/AD Enforcement VI, Import Administration, International 
    Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
    Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone: (202) 
    482-3692 or (202) 482-2786.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        Pursuant to 19 CFR 355.22(a), these reviews cover only those 
    producers or exporters of the subject merchandise for which a review 
    was specifically requested. Accordingly, the review of the order on 
    certain welded carbon steel pipe and tube (pipe and tube) covers
    
    [[Page 18886]]
    
    Borusan Birlesik Boru Fabrikalari A.S. and Borusan Ihracat Ithalat ve 
    Dagitim A.S. (Borusan Group). The review of the order on welded carbon 
    steel line pipe (line pipe) covers Mannesmann-Sumerbank Boru Endustrisi 
    T.A.S. (Mannesmann). These reviews cover the period January 1, 1996 
    through December 31, 1996, and 21 programs.
        The Department also received a timely request from Wheatland Tube 
    Company and the Maverick Tube Corporation (the petitioners) to conduct 
    reviews of Erciyas Boru Sanayii ve Ticaret A.S. (Erbosan), Yucel Boru 
    ve Profil Endustrisi A.S. (Yucel Boru), Bant Boru Sanayii ve Ticaret 
    A.S. (Bant Boru), Erkboru Profil San ve Tic A.S. (Erkboru). These 
    companies did not export pipe and tube or line pipe to the United 
    States during the period of review. Therefore, in the preliminary 
    results notice, we rescinded the reviews with respect to these 
    companies.
        Since the publication of the preliminary results on December 9, 
    1997 (62 FR 64808), the following events have occurred. We invited 
    interested parties to comment on the preliminary results. On January 8, 
    1997, a case brief was submitted by the Government of the Republic of 
    Turkey (GRT), Mannesmann, which exported line pipe, and the Borusan 
    Group, which exported pipe and tube to the United States during the 
    review period (the respondents). On January 15, 1998, a rebuttal brief 
    was submitted by the petitioners.
    
    Applicable Statute and Regulations
    
        Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the statute are 
    references to the provisions of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by 
    the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA) effective January 1, 1995 (the 
    Act). The Department is conducting these administrative reviews in 
    accordance with section 751(a) of the Act. Because these administrative 
    reviews were initiated on April 24, 1997, 19 CFR Part 355 is 
    applicable.
    
    Scope of the Reviews
    
        Imports covered by these reviews are shipments from Turkey of two 
    classes or kinds of merchandise: (1) Certain welded carbon steel pipe 
    and tube, having an outside diameter of 0.375 inch or more, but not 
    more than 16 inches, of any wall thickness. These products, commonly 
    referred to in the industry as standard pipe and tube or structural 
    tubing, are produced to various American Society for Testing and 
    Materials (ASTM) specifications, most notably A-53, A-120, A-135, A-
    500, or A-501; and (2) Certain welded carbon steel line pipe with an 
    outside diameter of 0.375 inch or more, but not more than 16 inches, 
    and with a wall thickness of not less than 0.065 inch. These products 
    are produced to various American Petroleum Institute (API) 
    specifications for line pipe, most notably API-L or API-LX. These 
    products are classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 
    United States (HTSUS) as item numbers 7306.30.10 and 7306.30.50. The 
    HTSUS item numbers are provided for convenience and Customs purposes. 
    The written description remains dispositive.
    
    Analysis of Programs
    
        Based upon the responses to our questionnaire and written comments 
    from the interested parties, we determine the following:
    
    I. Programs Conferring Subsidies
    
    A. Programs Previously Determined to Confer Subsidies
        1. Pre-shipment Export Credit. In the preliminary results, we found 
    that this program conferred countervailable subsidies on the subject 
    merchandise. We did not receive any comments on this program from the 
    interested parties. However, a review of the record has led us to 
    modify the calculations. In the preliminary results, we inadvertently 
    did not calculate the benefit on two loans for the Borusan Group. We 
    also amended our calculations of the benefit from all loans of the 
    Borusan Group to conform with the term of the commercial loans obtained 
    by the company. Accordingly, the net subsidies for this program have 
    changed from the preliminary results and are as follows:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                      Rate  
                Manufacturer/exporter of pipe and tube             (percent)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Borusan Group................................................       0.22
    Mannesmann...................................................       0.29
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        2. Freight Program. In the preliminary results, we found that this 
    program conferred countervailable subsidies on the subject merchandise. 
    Our review of the record and our analysis of the comments submitted by 
    the interested parties, summarized below (see comments 3 and 4, 
    Adjustment of the Freight Program Denominator), has led us to modify 
    our calculations for this program from the preliminary results. 
    Accordingly, the net subsidies for this program have changed and are as 
    follows:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                      Rate  
                Manufacturer/exporter of pipe and tube             (percent)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Borusan Group................................................       2.43
    Mannesmann...................................................       3.28
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        3. Foreign Exchange Loan Assistance. In the preliminary results, we 
    found that this program conferred countervailable subsidies on pipe and 
    tube. We did not receive any comments on this program from the 
    interested parties, and our review of the record has not led us to 
    change any findings or calculations. Accordingly, the net subsidy for 
    this program remain unchanged from the preliminary results and are as 
    follows:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                      Rate  
                Manufacturer/exporter of pipe and tube             (percent)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Borusan Group................................................       0.43
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        4. Incentive Premium on Domestically Obtained Goods. In the 
    preliminary results, we found that this program conferred 
    countervailable subsidies on pipe and tube. We did not receive any 
    comments on this program from the interested parties, and our review of 
    the record has not led us to change any findings or calculations. 
    Accordingly, the net subsidy for this program remain unchanged from the 
    preliminary results and are as follows:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                      Rate  
                Manufacturer/exporter of pipe and tube             (percent)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Borusan Group................................................       0.01
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        5. Investment Allowance. In the preliminary results, we found that 
    this program conferred countervailable subsidies on pipe and tube. We 
    did not receive any comments on this program from the interested 
    parties, and our review of the record has not led us to change any 
    findings or calculations. Accordingly, the net subsidy for this program 
    remain unchanged from the preliminary results and are as follows:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                      Rate  
                Manufacturer/exporter of pipe and tube             (percent)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Borusan Group................................................       0.02
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        B. New Program Determined to Confer Subsidies
        Deduction from Taxable Income for Export Revenues. In the 
    preliminary results, we found that the Deduction from Taxable Income 
    for Export Revenues conferred countervailable benefits on the subject 
    merchandise. We did not receive any comments on this program from the 
    interested parties.
    
    [[Page 18887]]
    
    Accordingly, the net subsidies for this program remain unchanged from 
    the preliminary results and are as follows:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                      Rate  
                Manufacturer/exporter of pipe and tube             (percent)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Borusan Group................................................     <0.005 mannesmann...................................................="" 0.16="" ------------------------------------------------------------------------="" ii.="" programs="" found="" to="" be="" not="" used="" in="" the="" preliminary="" results,="" we="" found="" that="" the="" producers="" and/or="" exporters="" of="" the="" subject="" merchandise="" did="" not="" apply="" for="" or="" receive="" benefits="" under="" the="" following="" programs:="" 1.="" resource="" utilization="" support.="" 2.="" state="" aid="" for="" exports="" program.="" 3.="" advance="" refunds="" of="" tax="" savings.="" 4.="" export="" credit="" through="" the="" foreign="" trade="" corporate="" companies="" rediscount="" credit="" facility="" (eximbank).="" 5.="" past="" performance="" related="" foreign="" currency="" export="" loans="" (eximbank).="" 6.="" export="" credit="" insurance="" (eximbank).="" 7.="" subsidized="" turkish="" lira="" credit="" facilities.="" 8.="" subsidized="" credit="" for="" proportion="" of="" fixed="" expenditures.="" 9.="" fund="" based="" credit.="" 10.="" export="" incentive="" certificate="" customs="" duty="" &="" other="" tax="" exemptions.="" 11.="" resource="" utilization="" support="" premium="" (rusp).="" 12.="" regional="" subsidies.="" (a)="" additional="" refunds="" of="" vat="" (vat="" +="" 10%).="" (b)="" postponement="" of="" vat="" on="" imported="" goods.="" (c)="" land="" allocation="" (gip).="" (d)="" taxes,="" fees="" (duties),="" charge="" exemption="" (gip).="" we="" did="" not="" receive="" any="" comments="" on="" these="" programs="" from="" the="" interested="" parties,="" and="" our="" review="" of="" the="" record="" has="" not="" led="" us="" to="" change="" our="" findings="" from="" the="" preliminary="" results.="" analysis="" of="" comments="" comment="" 1:="" measurement="" of="" countervailable="" benefit:="" earned="" versus="" receipt="" basis="" the="" respondents="" argue="" that="" the="" department's="" preliminary="" finding="" that="" exporters="" could="" not="" ``predict="" at="" the="" time="" of="" export="" what="" the="" benefit="" would="" be''="" under="" the="" freight="" program="" was="" in="" error="" and="" is="" contrary="" to="" the="" department's="" long-standing="" practice.="" the="" respondents="" state="" that="" the="" department's="" practice="" is="" to="" measure="" benefits="" on="" the="" date="" of="" export="" in="" cases="" where="" the="" benefit="" is="" earned="" on="" a="" shipment-by-="" shipment="" basis,="" and="" the="" exporter="" knows="" the="" amount="" of="" the="" benefit="" at="" the="" time="" of="" export.="" thus,="" because="" the="" exporters="" earned="" the="" benefit="" on="" a="" shipment-by-shipment="" basis="" upon="" exportation,="" and="" knew="" the="" precise="" u.s.="" dollar="" amount="" of="" the="" benefit="" at="" the="" time="" of="" exportation,="" the="" benefit="" should="" be="" measured="" on="" an="" ``earned="" basis.''="" the="" respondents="" also="" cite,="" but="" do="" not="" discuss,="" several="" cases="" to="" demonstrate="" the="" department's="" practice="" of="" measuring="" benefits="" on="" the="" date="" of="" export="" in="" cases="" where="" the="" benefit="" is="" earned="" on="" a="" shipment-by-="" shipment="" basis,="" and="" the="" exporter="" knows="" the="" amount="" of="" the="" benefit="" at="" the="" time="" of="" export.="" therefore,="" since="" the="" freight="" program="" encompasses="" these="" facts,="" they="" argue="" that,="" in="" order="" to="" apply="" this="" rule="" consistently,="" the="" department="" must="" calculate="" the="" benefits="" under="" the="" freight="" program="" on="" an="" ``as="" earned''="" basis,="" or="" explain="" the="" reason="" for="" the="" methodological="" change.="" in="" addition,="" the="" respondents="" claim="" that="" in="" certain="" welded="" carbon="" steel="" pipes="" and="" tubes="" and="" welded="" carbon="" steel="" line="" pipe="" from="" turkey;="" preliminary="" results="" of="" countervailing="" duty="" administrative="" reviews,="" 62="" fr="" 16782,="" 16787="" (april="" 8,="" 1997)="" and="" certain="" welded="" carbon="" steel="" pipes="" and="" tubes="" and="" welded="" carbon="" steel="" line="" pipe="" from="" turkey;="" final="" results="" of="" countervailing="" duty="" administrative="" reviews,="" 62="" fr="" 43984="" (august="" 18,="" 1997)="" (pipe="" and="" tube="" and="" line="" pipe="" 1995),="" the="" department="" countervailed="" benefits="" provided="" under="" the="" export="" performance="" credit="" program,="" which="" are="" similar="" to="" those="" provided="" under="" the="" freight="" program,="" on="" the="" date="" the="" merchandise="" was="" exported.="" the="" respondents="" state="" that="" the="" export="" performance="" credit="" program="" provided="" credits="" to="" exporters="" based="" on="" a="" percentage="" of="" the="" f.o.b.="" value="" of="" their="" exports,="" and="" the="" freight="" program="" provided="" rebates="" to="" exporters="" in="" the="" amount="" of="" $50="" per="" ton="" for="" merchandise="" exported="" on="" turkish="" vessels,="" and="" $30="" per="" ton="" for="" non-="" turkish="" vessels.="" they="" argue="" that="" the="" exporters="" did="" not="" know,="" at="" the="" time="" of="" export,="" the="" exact="" rate="" of="" exchange="" that="" would="" be="" used="" to="" convert="" the="" dollar="" amount="" to="" turkish="" lira="" (tl)="" under="" either="" of="" the="" programs="" and,="" therefore,="" the="" exporters="" did="" not="" know="" the="" ``precise''="" amount="" of="" the="" benefit="" in="" tl="" that="" they="" would="" receive="" at="" a="" later="" date.="" the="" respondents="" also="" claim="" that,="" in="" designing="" the="" freight="" program,="" the="" grt="" was="" well="" aware="" that="" turkish="" companies="" invoice="" their="" export="" shipments="" in="" u.s.="" dollars.="" because="" both="" the="" benefit="" and="" the="" sales="" value="" were="" expressed="" in="" u.s.="" dollars,="" they="" claim="" that="" a="" benefit="" denominated="" in="" u.s.="" dollars="" would="" directly="" affect="" the="" price="" turkish="" companies="" charged="" their="" customers.="" by="" contrast,="" a="" benefit="" denominated="" in="" tl="" that="" would="" be="" given="" at="" an="" unspecified="" later="" date="" would,="" in="" a="" hyperinflationary="" economy,="" have="" been="" of="" unknown="" value="" at="" the="" time="" of="" export="" and="" would="" have="" had="" little="" or="" no="" effect="" on="" the="" price="" or="" volume="" of="" goods="" exported.="" therefore,="" they="" argue="" that="" a="" benefit="" amount="" expressed="" in="" u.s.="" dollars="" clearly="" provided="" the="" exporters="" with="" a="" far="" more="" certain="" knowledge="" of="" the="" true="" ``value''="" of="" the="" benefit,="" because="" u.s.="" dollars="" hold="" their="" value,="" than="" if="" the="" benefit="" had="" originally="" been="" expressed="" in="" tl="" because="" of="" high="" inflation="" in="" turkey.="" the="" petitioners="" argue="" that,="" on="" the="" date="" of="" export,="" the="" exporters="" knew="" only="" the="" u.s.="" dollar-denominated="" amount="" that="" would="" be="" used="" to="" calculate="" the="" tl="" benefit="" at="" some="" uncertain="" future="" date,="" and="" that="" the="" participants="" were="" not="" assured="" that="" they="" would="" ultimately="" receive="" the="" equivalent="" of="" the="" u.s.="" dollar-denominated="" amount="" in="" tl.="" instead,="" the="" conversion="" of="" the="" benefit="" into="" a="" tl="" amount="" was="" accomplished="" using="" an="" exchange="" rate="" that="" was="" not="" contemporaneous="" with="" either="" the="" date="" of="" export="" or="" the="" date="" of="" payment.="" between="" the="" exchange="" rate="" date="" and="" the="" date="" of="" payment,="" the="" real="" benefit="" eroded="" from="" hyperinflation.="" as="" a="" result,="" the="" amount="" the="" exporters="" received="" was="" not="" the="" tl="" equivalent="" of="" the="" dollar-denominated="" benefit.="" the="" petitioners="" further="" argue="" that,="" in="" fact,="" the="" borusan="" group="" and="" mannesmann="" did="" not="" ultimately="" receive="" a="" benefit="" of="" $30/$50="" per="" ton.="" at="" the="" time="" of="" payment,="" the="" lira-="" denominated="" benefit="" was="" worth="" no="" more="" than="" $17.10/$28.50,="" respectively.="" the="" petitioners="" also="" claim="" that="" none="" of="" the="" cases="" cited="" by="" the="" respondents="" argues="" for="" a="" different="" result="" from="" that="" in="" the="" preliminary="" determination="" or="" the="" department's="" decision="" in="" pipe="" and="" tube="" and="" line="" pipe="" 1995.="" the="" petitioners="" point="" to="" the="" final="" affirmative="" countervailing="" duty="" determinations;="" certain="" welded="" carbon="" steel="" pipe="" and="" tube="" products="" from="" turkey,="" 51="" fr="" 1268,="" 1273="" (january="" 10,="" 1986)="" (final="" affirmative="" 1986)="" (wherein="" the="" department="" enunciated="" its="" general="" rule="" for="" assessing="" benefits="" on="" an="" ``as="" earned''="" basis="" where="" the="" benefit="" rebates="" a="" fixed="" proportion="" of="" the="" value="" of="" the="" shipment="" and="" is="" known="" to="" the="" exporter),="" noting="" that="" the="" rationale="" for="" countervailing="" amounts="" received="" applies="" when="" the="" recipient="" could="" not="" anticipate="" precisely="" how="" much="" would="" be="" received="" and="" hence="" could="" not="" make="" business="" decisions="" based="" upon="" benefits="" received="" at="" a="" future="" date.="" thus,="" they="" argue="" that="" the="" department's="" position="" in="" the="" final="" affirmative="" 1986="" is="" consistent="" with="" its="" treatment="" of="" the="" freight="" program="" in="" this="" review="" because="" the="" exporters="" did="" not="" know="" and="" could="" not="" have="" known="" precisely="" the="" amount="" of="" the="" benefit="" at="" the="" time="" of="" export.="" [[page="" 18888]]="" moreover,="" all="" the="" other="" cases="" cited="" by="" the="" respondents,="" the="" petitioners="" argue,="" did="" not="" deal="" with="" hyperinflationary="" economies.="" see="" certain="" iron-metal="" castings="" from="" india="" (indian="" castings),="" 60="" fr="" 44843="" (august="" 29,="" 1995);="" cotton="" shop="" towels="" from="" pakistan="" (shop="" towels),="" 61="" fr="" 50273,="" 50275="" (september="" 25,="" 1996),="" (rebates="" earned="" on="" a="" shipment-by-="" shipment="" basis="" upon="" export="" with="" no="" diminution="" of="" value="" due="" to="" hyperinflation).="" see="" also,="" carbon="" steel="" butt-weld="" pipe="" fittings="" from="" thailand="" (butt-weld="" pipe="" fittings),="" 55="" fr="" 1695="" (january="" 18,="" 1990)="" (benefits="" under="" the="" tax="" certificates="" for="" exports="" program="" assessed="" on="" ``as="" earned''="" because="" the="" benefits="" were="" payable="" on="" a="" fixed="" percentage="" of="" the="" f.o.b.="" value="" of="" export);="" certain="" carbon="" steel="" products="" from="" brazil,="" 49="" fr="" 17988="" (april="" 26,="" 1984).="" however,="" the="" petitioners="" argue="" that="" in="" a="" hyperinflationary="" economy,="" a="" delay="" in="" receiving="" payment="" can="" render="" the="" amount="" of="" the="" eventual="" benefit="" uncertain,="" unless="" it="" is="" tied="" to="" a="" stable="" currency.="" department's="" position:="" as="" we="" have="" already="" stated="" in="" pipe="" and="" tube="" and="" line="" pipe="" 1995,="" it="" is="" the="" department's="" long-standing="" practice="" to="" countervail="" an="" export="" subsidy="" on="" the="" date="" of="" export="" on="" an="" ``earned="" basis''="" rather="" than="" on="" the="" date="" the="" benefit="" is="" received="" where="" it="" is="" provided="" as="" a="" percentage="" of="" the="" value="" of="" the="" exported="" merchandise="" on="" a="" shipment-by-shipment="" basis,="" and="" the="" exact="" amount="" of="" the="" countervailable="" subsidy="" is="" known="" at="" the="" time="" of="" export.="" contrary="" to="" the="" respondents'="" assertions,="" we="" have="" not="" departed="" from="" our="" practice.="" in="" pipe="" and="" tube="" and="" line="" pipe="" 1995="" at="" 16785,="" and="" in="" these="" preliminary="" results,="" we="" stated="" that="" although="" the="" benefit="" under="" the="" freight="" program="" is="" calculated="" based="" on="" export="" tonnage="" and="" not="" as="" a="" percent="" of="" the="" f.o.b.="" value,="" it="" is="" possible="" that="" the="" value="" of="" a="" benefit="" determined="" by="" tonnage="" could="" be="" known="" at="" the="" time="" of="" export="" and,="" thus,="" the="" countervailable="" benefit="" could="" be="" earned="" upon="" exportation.="" however,="" as="" we="" previously="" determined="" in="" pipe="" and="" tube="" and="" line="" pipe="" 1995,="" and="" as="" the="" facts="" in="" these="" reviews="" establish,="" with="" regard="" to="" the="" freight="" program,="" the="" exporter="" did="" not="" know="" the="" amount="" of="" the="" benefit="" at="" the="" time="" of="" export.="" the="" benefits="" under="" the="" freight="" program="" were="" stated="" in="" u.s.="" dollars="" per="" ton="" at="" the="" time="" of="" export,="" and="" were="" converted="" to="" tls="" when="" they="" were="" paid="" at="" a="" later="" date.="" because="" the="" grt="" did="" not="" commit="" to="" use="" the="" exchange="" rate="" prevailing="" on="" the="" day="" the="" payment="" was="" made,="" as="" in="" the="" export="" performance="" credit="" program,="" the="" exporter="" could="" not="" have="" known="" the="" value="" of="" the="" benefit="" at="" the="" time="" of="" export,="" neither="" in="" u.s.="" dollars="" nor="" in="" tls.="" in="" fact,="" the="" grt="" announced="" in="" february="" 1995,="" two="" months="" after="" the="" shipments="" took="" place,="" that="" it="" would="" convert="" the="" dollar="" amount="" of="" the="" freight="" benefits="" using="" the="" exchange="" rate="" that="" was="" in="" effect="" on="" the="" last="" day="" in="" december="" 1994.="" thus,="" the="" exporter="" ultimately="" received="" in="" 1996="" an="" amount="" in="" tls="" that="" did="" not="" correspond="" to="" the="" u.s.="" dollar="" value="" of="" the="" benefit="" granted="" by="" the="" government="" in="" 1994="" at="" the="" time="" of="" shipment;="" under="" the="" circumstances,="" it="" is="" also="" obvious="" that,="" at="" the="" time="" of="" shipment,="" the="" exporter="" was="" in="" no="" position="" to="" predict="" what="" the="" amount="" of="" the="" final="" payment="" would="" be.="" see="" pipe="" and="" tube="" and="" line="" pipe="" 1995="" at="" 43991.="" indeed,="" the="" respondents="" concede="" that="" ``[h]ad="" the="" benefit="" been="" denominated="" in="" tl,="" the="" value="" of="" the="" ultimate="" benefit="" received,="" as="" measured="" in="" constant="" tl,="" would="" not="" have="" been="" known="" at="" the="" time="" of="" export="" due="" to="" the="" high="" inflation="" in="" turkey="" at="" the="" time.''="" case="" brief="" p.="" 7-8.="" contrary="" to="" the="" respondents'="" argument="" that="" the="" freight="" program="" is="" indistinguishable="" from="" the="" export="" performance="" credit="" program,="" we="" found="" that="" the="" programs="" are="" distinguishable.="" under="" the="" export="" performance="" credit="" program,="" the="" value="" of="" the="" benefit="" was="" tied="" to="" the="" u.s.="" dollar.="" exporters="" would="" receive="" a="" percentage="" of="" the="" u.s.="" dollar="" value="" of="" their="" exports="" in="" tls="" based="" on="" the="" foreign="" exchange="" rate="" prevailing="" at="" the="" time="" of="" payment.="" thus,="" although="" at="" the="" time="" of="" receipt="" the="" exporters="" received="" more="" tl="" than="" they="" would="" have="" been="" paid="" upon="" exportation,="" because="" the="" benefit="" was="" tied="" to="" the="" u.s.="" dollar,="" the="" value="" of="" the="" tl="" amount="" remained="" the="" same="" in="" u.s.="" dollar="" terms.="" however,="" under="" the="" freight="" program,="" the="" grt="" converted="" the="" u.s.="" dollar="" value="" in="" tl="" using="" an="" exchange="" rate="" that="" did="" not="" reflect="" the="" full="" u.s.="" dollar="" value="" of="" the="" benefit="" at="" the="" time="" of="" payment.="" therefore,="" we="" have="" determined="" that="" in="" the="" case="" of="" the="" export="" performance="" program,="" the="" value="" of="" the="" benefit="" was="" known="" at="" the="" time="" of="" export,="" and="" therefore="" can="" be="" calculated="" on="" an="" ``as="" earned''="" basis,="" but="" in="" the="" case="" of="" the="" freight="" program,="" the="" value="" of="" the="" benefit="" was="" not="" known="" at="" the="" point="" of="" export="" because="" the="" exporters="" did="" not="" know="" the="" exchange="" rate="" that="" the="" grt="" would="" use="" to="" convert="" the="" u.s.="" dollar="" benefit="" into="" tls.="" as="" such,="" for="" the="" freight="" program,="" the="" calculation="" must="" be="" based="" on="" an="" ``as="" received''="" basis.="" as="" petitioners="" point="" out,="" the="" cases="" cited="" accord="" with="" the="" department's="" measurement="" of="" the="" benefits="" for="" the="" freight="" program.="" in="" shop="" towels="" and="" in="" indian="" castings,="" export="" rebates="" were="" earned="" on="" a="" shipment-by-shipment="" basis,="" and="" the="" exact="" amount="" of="" the="" rebate="" was="" known="" at="" the="" time="" of="" export="" because="" the="" rebate="" was="" set="" as="" a="" percentage="" of="" the="" f.o.b.="" value="" of="" the="" exported="" merchandise.="" see="" also,="" butt-weld="" pipe="" fittings;="" certain="" textile="" mill="" products="" and="" apparel="" from="" colombia;="" certain="" textile="" mill="" products="" from="" thailand;="" certain="" carbon="" steel="" products="" from="" brazil.="" further,="" in="" paint="" filters="" and="" strainers="" from="" brazil,="" 52="" fr="" 19184="" (may="" 21,="" 1987)="" (paint="" filters),="" the="" department="" did="" not="" countervail="" the="" benefit="" from="" the="" ipi="" export="" credit="" premium="" program="" because="" we="" found="" that="" the="" program="" was="" terminated="" prior="" to="" the="" initiation="" of="" that="" case,="" and="" companies="" could="" no="" longer="" receive="" benefits="" after="" the="" date="" of="" termination.="" we="" did="" make="" a="" statement="" in="" paint="" filters="" that,="" the="" department="" had="" consistently="" calculated="" the="" benefit="" under="" the="" ipi="" export="" credit="" premium="" program="" in="" prior="" cases="" based="" on="" the="" date="" the="" premium="" was="" earned.="" however,="" as="" noted="" in="" certain="" carbon="" steel="" products="" from="" brazil,="" the="" ipi="" export="" credit="" premium="" was="" based="" on="" the="" f.o.b.="" value="" of="" the="" exported="" merchandise,="" and="" the="" amount="" of="" the="" benefit="" was="" known="" at="" the="" time="" of="" export.="" comment="" 2:="" policy="" considerations="" for="" measurement="" of="" benefits="" the="" respondents="" argue="" that="" policy="" considerations="" dictate="" that="" the="" freight="" program="" should="" be="" countervailed="" based="" on="" the="" date="" the="" benefit="" was="" earned="" because="" benefits="" should="" be="" countervailed="" when="" they="" will="" have="" the="" greatest="" potential="" effect="" on="" a="" company's="" export="" volumes="" or="" pricing="" to="" the="" united="" states.="" since,="" they="" argue,="" the="" countervailing="" duty="" law="" is="" intended="" to="" offset="" export="" subsidies,="" it="" makes="" no="" sense="" to="" now="" countervail="" benefits="" under="" the="" freight="" program,="" which="" was="" terminated="" at="" the="" end="" of="" 1994,="" because="" there="" were="" no="" longer="" any="" incentives="" for="" companies="" to="" export="" during="" the="" period="" of="" review.="" in="" proffering="" this="" policy="" argument,="" the="" respondents="" claim="" that,="" because="" the="" benefits="" under="" the="" freight="" program="" were="" intended="" to="" offset="" freight="" charges="" incurred="" on="" export="" shipments,="" the="" benefit="" should="" only="" be="" countervailable="" on="" the="" date="" of="" export="" because="" the="" freight="" charges="" were="" payable="" immediately="" after="" the="" goods="" were="" exported.="" in="" support,="" the="" respondents="" point="" to="" section="" 351.514(b)="" of="" the="" countervailing="" duties:="" notice="" of="" proposed="" rulemaking,="" 62="" fr="" 8818="" (february="" 26,="" 1997)="" (department's="" proposed="" regulations),="" which="" deals="" with="" freight="" charges.="" the="" respondents="" argue="" that="" under="" this="" proposed="" regulation,="" the="" department="" will="" consider="" the="" benefit="" to="" have="" been="" received="" as="" of="" the="" date="" on="" which="" the="" firm="" pays="" or,="" in="" the="" absence="" of="" payment,="" was="" due="" to="" pay="" the="" [[page="" 18889]]="" transport="" or="" freight="" charges.="" therefore,="" because="" section="" 351.514(b)="" countervails="" freight="" benefits="" when="" they="" are="" actually="" incurred,="" they="" argue="" that="" the="" freight="" program="" benefits="" should="" be="" countervailed="" on="" the="" date="" the="" freight="" charges="" were="" incurred,="" and="" not="" when="" the="" reimbursements="" for="" these="" charges="" were="" later="" received.="" the="" petitioners="" counter="" that="" it="" is="" incorrect="" for="" the="" respondents="" to="" suggest="" that="" there="" is="" any="" support="" for="" their="" position="" in="" section="" 351.514(b)="" of="" the="" department's="" proposed="" regulations.="" section="" 351.514="" corresponds="" to="" paragraph="" (c)="" of="" the="" illustrative="" list="" of="" export="" subsidies="" (illustrative="" list),="" annexed="" to="" the="" agreement="" on="" subsidies="" and="" countervailing="" measures="" and="" deals="" with="" preferential="" internal="" transport="" and="" freight="" charges="" on="" export="" shipments.="" the="" petitioners="" argue="" that="" neither="" subsection="" (c)="" of="" the="" illustrative="" list="" nor="" section="" 351.514="" can="" apply="" to="" the="" freight="" program,="" because="" the="" turkish="" freight="" program="" does="" not="" involve="" the="" provision="" of="" internal="" transport="" at="" preferential="" rates.="" rather,="" petitioners="" claim="" that="" the="" freight="" program="" provides="" a="" bounty,="" which="" may="" lower="" the="" exporter's="" costs,="" but="" the="" actual="" freight="" charge="" payable="" is="" not="" altered.="" they="" claim="" that="" where="" the="" benefit="" consists="" of="" providing="" freight="" at="" preferential="" rates,="" the="" exporter="" reaps="" the="" benefit="" at="" the="" time="" of="" shipment.="" therefore,="" it="" makes="" sense="" to="" assess="" duties="" on="" the="" basis="" of="" shipment="" when="" there="" is="" a="" simultaneous="" discount="" in="" a="" fixed="" amount.="" however,="" it="" is="" another="" matter="" to="" provide="" a="" bounty="" of="" an="" indeterminate="" amount="" at="" some="" later="" time,="" particularly="" in="" a="" hyperinflationary="" economy.="" department's="" position:="" we="" disagree="" with="" the="" respondents'="" argument="" that,="" as="" a="" matter="" of="" policy,="" the="" department="" should="" countervail="" benefits="" under="" the="" freight="" program="" on="" the="" date="" of="" export="" because="" benefits="" should="" be="" countervailed="" when="" they="" have="" the="" greatest="" potential="" to="" affect="" the="" exporters'="" volume="" and="" pricing="" decisions.="" the="" countervailing="" duty="" law="" does="" not="" examine="" when="" benefits="" will="" have="" the="" greatest="" potential="" effect="" on="" exports="" to="" the="" united="" states.="" pursuant="" to="" section="" 771(5)(c),="" ``the="" administering="" authority="" is="" not="" required="" to="" consider="" the="" effect="" of="" the="" subsidy="" in="" determining="" whether="" a="" subsidy="" exists="" *="" *="" *.''="" moreover,="" under="" the="" act,="" a="" benefit="" that="" is="" contingent="" upon="" export="" is="" an="" export="" subsidy="" and,="" thus,="" countervailable.="" see="" section="" 771(5a)(b).="" therefore,="" in="" accordance="" with="" section="" 771(5a)(b),="" we="" found="" the="" freight="" program="" to="" be="" a="" countervailable="" export="" subsidy="" because="" the="" benefit="" is="" contingent="" upon="" export="" performance,="" regardless="" of="" whether="" we="" measure="" the="" benefit="" on="" an="" earned="" or="" received="" basis.="" moreover,="" we="" disagree="" with="" the="" respondents'="" argument="" that="" once="" a="" program="" is="" terminated,="" benefits="" received="" thereafter="" should="" not,="" as="" a="" matter="" of="" policy,="" be="" countervailed="" because="" the="" effect="" of="" such="" benefits="" on="" the="" exporters'="" decision="" to="" export="" has="" passed.="" under="" the="" logic="" of="" the="" respondents'="" argument,="" the="" department="" would="" never="" be="" able="" to="" countervail="" export="" subsidies="" unless="" the="" benefit="" from="" such="" subsidies="" could="" be="" measured="" at="" the="" time="" of="" shipment.="" clearly="" this="" proposal="" conflicts="" with="" the="" statute="" and="" our="" long-standing="" practice.="" our="" standard="" methodology="" is="" to="" countervail="" subsidies="" at="" the="" time="" the="" subsidy="" affects="" the="" cash="" flow="" of="" the="" company.="" see,="" e.g.,="" ferrochrome="" from="" south="" africa;="" final="" results="" of="" countervailing="" duty="" administrative="" review,="" 56="" fr="" 33254,="" 33255="" (july="" 19,="" 1991).="" generally,="" that="" can="" only="" be="" determined="" when="" the="" subsidy="" is="" paid="" or="" received="" by="" the="" company.="" the="" only="" exception="" to="" this="" general="" proposition="" has="" been="" when="" export="" subsidies="" are="" paid="" as="" a="" percentage="" of="" the="" f.o.b.="" value="" of="" the="" exported="" merchandise.="" see="" the="" department's="" position="" on="" comment="" 1.="" only="" in="" these="" situations="" does="" the="" company="" know="" with="" precision="" at="" all="" times="" what="" the="" benefit="" from="" the="" subsidy="" is.="" only="" under="" these="" circumstances="" is="" the="" department="" able="" to="" determine="" the="" subsidy="" rate="" on="" an="" ``as="" earned''="" basis.="" because="" the="" respondents="" received="" benefits="" during="" the="" period="" of="" review,="" we="" have="" properly="" included="" these="" benefit="" amounts="" in="" our="" subsidy="" calculations.="" the="" fact="" that="" the="" program="" was="" terminated="" prior="" to="" the="" period="" of="" review="" is="" not="" material.="" it="" is="" the="" department's="" practice="" to="" countervail="" residual="" benefits="" from="" a="" terminated="" program.="" see,="" e.g.,="" live="" swine="" from="" canada;="" notice="" of="" preliminary="" results="" of="" countervailing="" duty="" administrative="" reviews;="" initiation="" and="" preliminary="" results="" of="" changed="" circumstances="" review="" and="" intent="" to="" revoke="" order="" in="" part,="" 61="" fr="" 26879,="" 26889="" (may="" 29,="" 1996)="" and="" live="" swine="" from="" canada;="" final="" results="" of="" countervailing="" duty="" administrative="" reviews,="" 61="" fr="" 52408="" (october="" 7,="" 1996);="" pipe="" and="" tube="" and="" line="" pipe="" 1995="" at="" 43991.="" furthermore,="" we="" note="" that,="" in="" the="" instant="" case,="" because="" the="" benefits="" were="" provided="" in="" cash="" and="" bonds="" with="" a="" two-year="" maturity,="" benefits="" will="" continue="" to="" accrue="" beyond="" this="" period="" of="" review.="" finally,="" the="" respondents="" also="" argue="" that="" the="" department="" should="" countervail="" the="" benefits="" under="" the="" freight="" program="" on="" the="" date="" the="" freight="" charges="" for="" exportation="" were="" payable="" and="" not="" when="" the="" reimbursements="" for="" these="" charges="" were="" received.="" in="" support="" of="" their="" argument,="" the="" respondents="" cite="" to="" section="" 351.514="" of="" the="" department's="" proposed="" regulations.="" first,="" we="" note="" that="" the="" proposed="" regulations="" have="" not="" yet="" been="" finalized,="" and,="" thus,="" are="" not="" controlling="" in="" these="" reviews.="" however,="" even="" in="" citing="" to="" those="" proposed="" regulations,="" the="" respondents="" have="" erred="" in="" their="" interpretation.="" section="" 351.514(b)="" of="" the="" department's="" proposed="" regulations="" corresponds="" to="" paragraph="" (c)="" of="" the="" illustrative="" list,="" and="" deals="" with="" preferential="" internal="" transport="" and="" freight="" charges="" on="" goods="" destined="" for="" export.="" paragraph="" (a)(1)="" restates="" the="" general="" principle="" that="" a="" benefit="" exists="" to="" the="" extent="" that="" a="" firm="" pays="" less="" for="" the="" internal="" transport="" of="" goods="" destined="" for="" export="" than="" it="" would="" for="" the="" transport="" of="" goods="" destined="" for="" domestic="" consumption.="" therefore,="" the="" financial="" contribution="" is="" provided="" when="" the="" payment="" for="" the="" freight="" charges="" occurs.="" consequently,="" we="" would="" countervail="" the="" benefit="" at="" the="" time="" of="" payment="" of="" the="" reduced="" freight="" charges.="" as="" stated="" in="" the="" proposed="" regulations,="" ``the="" secretary="" normally="" will="" consider="" the="" benefit="" as="" having="" been="" received="" by="" the="" firm="" on="" the="" date="" the="" firm="" paid,="" or="" in="" the="" absence="" of="" payment,="" was="" due="" to="" pay,="" the="" charges.''="" the="" freight="" program,="" on="" the="" other="" hand,="" does="" not="" involve="" the="" provision="" of="" transport="" services="" at="" preferential="" rates.="" rather,="" according="" to="" the="" enabling="" legislation,="" the="" freight="" program="" was="" a="" freight="" bonus,="" i.e.,="" a="" benefit="" contingent="" upon="" export.="" see,="" questionnaire="" response,="" volume="" ii--exhibit="" 9,="" dated="" june="" 30,="" 1997.="" therefore,="" we="" continue="" to="" countervail="" this="" benefit="" at="" the="" time="" the="" financial="" contribution="" affects="" the="" cash="" flow="" of="" the="" company,="" which="" is="" when="" the="" company="" receives="" the="" payment="" of="" the="" subsidy="" to="" which="" it="" is="" entitled="" as="" a="" result="" of="" prior="" exportations.="" comment="" 3:="" adjustment="" of="" sales="" values="" for="" foreign="" exchange="" difference="" (kur="" farki)="" the="" respondents="" argue="" that="" the="" department's="" decision="" to="" adjust="" the="" sales="" value="" by="" the="" amount="" of="" the="" foreign="" exchange="" difference="" (kur="" farki="" account)="" reduced="" the="" export="" sales="" amount="" in="" the="" denominator,="" which="" led="" to="" an="" erroneous="" increase="" of="" the="" countervailable="" benefit="" for="" each="" company="" under="" review.="" the="" respondents="" state="" that="" the="" department="" specifically="" requested="" that="" the="" respondents="" provide="" total="" sales="" as="" booked="" and="" recorded="" in="" their="" accounting="" records,="" which="" included="" the="" sales="" revenue="" account="" plus="" the="" sum="" of="" the="" values="" in="" the="" kur="" farki="" account.="" this="" accounting="" practice="" is="" consistent="" with="" the="" standardized="" turkish="" accounting="" principles.="" they="" state="" that="" the="" department's="" explanation="" for="" deducting="" [[page="" 18890]]="" the="" foreign="" exchange="" difference="" from="" the="" sales="" value="" is="" based="" on="" a="" fundamental="" misunderstanding="" of="" what="" the="" kur="" farki="" account="" actually="" represents.="" they="" argue="" that="" it="" does="" not="" represent="" an="" inflation="" adjustment,="" but="" actual="" revenue="" earned="" on="" export="" sales.="" they="" claim="" that="" the="" department="" incorrectly="" assumes="" that="" the="" benefits="" initially="" denominated="" in="" dollars="" are="" received="" precisely="" on="" the="" date="" of="" export="" and="" are="" converted="" to="" tl="" on="" that="" date,="" whereas="" the="" income="" from="" the="" sale="" is="" converted="" at="" a="" later="" date="" and="" is="" therefore="" ``inflation="" adjusted.''="" specifically,="" they="" claim="" that="" the="" kur="" farki="" account="" reflects="" the="" difference="" between="" the="" estimated="" tl="" amount="" recorded="" on="" the="" invoice="" date,="" when="" the="" sale="" is="" booked,="" and="" the="" tl="" amount="" actually="" received="" upon="" receipt="" of="" payment="" from="" the="" customer.="" depending="" on="" the="" date="" that="" the="" payment="" is="" received,="" the="" exchange="" difference="" can="" increase="" or="" decrease="" the="" invoice="" value.="" therefore,="" the="" total="" amount="" in="" the="" kur="" farki="" account="" and="" the="" sale="" revenues="" account="" represents="" total="" actual="" income="" received="" from="" export="" sales="" transactions.="" finally,="" the="" respondents="" argue="" that="" if="" the="" department="" insists="" on="" reducing="" the="" total="" export="" value="" by="" the="" foreign="" exchange="" difference,="" then="" it="" must="" compute="" and="" deduct="" from="" the="" numerator="" (the="" countervailable="" benefit)="" the="" foreign="" exchange="" difference="" included="" in="" the="" benefit="" calculated="" from="" the="" date="" of="" exportation="" generating="" the="" benefit="" until="" the="" date="" the="" benefit="" was="" converted="" to="" tl.="" the="" respondents="" conclude="" that="" such="" an="" adjustment="" would="" more="" than="" offset="" the="" adjustment="" to="" the="" denominator.="" the="" petitioners="" counter="" that="" the="" issue="" is="" not="" whether="" the="" foreign="" exchange="" difference="" amounts="" are="" actual="" revenue;="" the="" issue="" is="" how="" to="" treat="" an="" adjustment="" that="" is="" made="" solely="" to="" reflect="" differences="" in="" the="" relative="" value="" of="" currencies="" over="" time="" in="" a="" highly="" inflationary="" economy.="" the="" initial="" invoice="" price="" represents="" the="" true="" price="" in="" terms="" of="" the="" currency="" as="" it="" was="" valued="" on="" the="" date="" of="" the="" invoice,="" while="" the="" foreign="" exchange="" difference="" represents="" the="" true="" price="" in="" terms="" of="" the="" currency="" as="" it="" was="" valued="" on="" a="" different="" date.="" both="" prices="" are="" ``actual''="" prices="" but="" are="" expressed="" in="" currencies="" having="" different="" values.="" thus,="" they="" argue="" that="" the="" department="" would="" not="" wish="" to="" use="" dollar-denominated="" benefits="" in="" the="" numerator="" and="" lira-denominated="" benefits="" in="" the="" denominator,="" it="" also="" cannot="" allow="" the="" differing="" values="" of="" the="" tl="" over="" time="" to="" distort="" the="" results="" of="" its="" calculations.="" department's="" position:="" the="" same="" arguments="" were="" discussed="" in="" the="" prior="" review.="" although="" there="" was="" further="" explanation="" of="" the="" accounting="" system="" in="" this="" review,="" basically,="" the="" facts="" are="" the="" same="" and="" our="" position="" remains="" unchanged.="" see="" pipe="" and="" tube="" and="" line="" pipe="" 1995.="" we="" do="" not="" agree="" with="" the="" respondents="" that="" the="" amounts="" in="" their="" kur="" farki="" account="" are="" actual="" sales="" revenue.="" when="" the="" exporter="" makes="" a="" sale,="" the="" invoice="" amount="" in="" tl="" is="" recorded="" in="" the="" company's="" sales="" ledger.="" payment="" of="" the="" invoice="" is="" subsequently="" received="" in="" u.s.="" dollars="" which="" are="" converted="" into="" tl="" based="" on="" the="" exchange="" rate="" prevailing="" on="" that="" date.="" any="" difference="" between="" the="" invoice="" amount="" in="" tl="" and="" the="" actual="" payment="" in="" tl="" is="" recorded="" in="" the="" kur="" farki="" account.="" therefore,="" we="" conclude="" that="" the="" adjustment="" recorded="" in="" the="" kur="" farki="" account="" is="" income="" derived="" from="" fluctuations="" of="" the="" relative="" value="" of="" the="" dollar="" versus="" the="" tl,="" rather="" than="" additional="" sales="" revenue,="" as="" respondents="" claim.="" such="" foreign="" exchange="" difference="" becomes="" particularly="" significant="" in="" turkey's="" highly="" inflationary="" economy.="" as="" such,="" it="" is="" inappropriate="" to="" include="" it="" in="" the="" denominator.="" we="" understand="" that="" the="" amounts="" in="" the="" kur="" farki="" account="" are="" included="" in="" the="" companies'="" total="" revenue="" figures,="" in="" accordance="" with="" turkey's="" generally="" accepted="" principles.="" however,="" although="" the="" amounts="" recorded="" in="" the="" kur="" farki="" account="" may="" be="" included="" in="" the="" companies'="" income="" statement="" as="" part="" of="" the="" total="" revenue="" figure="" for="" tax="" purposes,="" this="" does="" not="" detract="" from="" our="" finding.="" see="" price="" waterhouse,="" doing="" business="" in="" turkey,="" chapter="" 11="" (1992)="" (lack="" of="" clearly="" defined="" commercial="" accounting="" principles="" and="" the="" predominance="" of="" tax="" law="" mean="" that="" turkish="" law="" should="" be="" treated="" with="" extreme="" caution,="" and="" international="" accounting="" standards="" are="" preferred).="" therefore,="" it="" is="" proper="" for="" the="" department="" to="" exclude="" the="" amounts="" in="" the="" kur="" farki="" account="" from="" the="" sales="" figures="" (denominators).="" we="" also="" disagree="" with="" the="" respondents'="" argument="" that="" the="" department="" must="" compute="" and="" deduct="" from="" the="" numerator="" the="" foreign="" exchange="" difference="" included="" in="" the="" benefit="" calculated="" from="" the="" date="" of="" export="" until="" the="" benefit="" was="" converted="" to="" tl.="" as="" discussed="" in="" the="" department's="" position="" on="" comment="" 1,="" the="" countervailable="" benefit="" under="" the="" freight="" program="" is="" the="" actual="" amount="" of="" tl="" measured="" at="" the="" time="" of="" receipt.="" therefore,="" benefits="" from="" this="" program="" in="" the="" numerator="" reflect="" the="" tl="" received="" at="" that="" time.="" for="" these="" reasons,="" the="" department's="" position="" remains="" unchanged="" from="" the="" preliminary="" results.="" comment="" 4:="" adjustments="" of="" the="" freight="" program="" denominator="" the="" respondents="" contend="" that="" the="" department="" made="" a="" clerical="" error="" in="" calculating="" the="" denominator="" used="" to="" determine="" benefits="" received="" by="" the="" borusan="" group="" under="" the="" freight="" program.="" the="" respondents="" also="" argue="" that,="" if="" the="" department="" continues="" to="" incorrectly="" adjust="" the="" sales="" values="" by="" the="" foreign="" exchange="" difference,="" then="" the="" department="" must="" correct="" a="" clerical="" error="" it="" made="" in="" calculating="" the="" ``adjusted''="" value="" of="" mannesmann's="" total="" exports="" of="" the="" subject="" merchandise="" to="" the="" united="" states.="" the="" respondents="" state="" that="" mannesmann="" reported="" a="" negative="" foreign="" exchange="" difference="" in="" connection="" with="" export="" sales="" of="" the="" subject="" merchandise="" to="" the="" united="" states,="" and="" because="" the="" value="" is="" negative,="" they="" argue="" that="" the="" department="" should="" have="" added="" the="" negative="" foreign="" exchange="" difference="" to="" the="" original="" sales="" value="" rather="" than="" subtracting="" it.="" the="" petitioners="" claim="" that="" the="" ``error''="" in="" calculating="" mannesmann's="" denominator="" could="" not="" have="" been="" ministerial="" unless="" the="" department="" was="" clearly="" informed="" previously="" that="" a="" negative="" amount="" in="" the="" ``kur="" farki''="" account="" was="" intended="" to="" reflect="" the="" fact="" that="" mannesmann="" received="" payment="" from="" the="" customer="" prior="" to="" the="" date="" that="" the="" invoice="" was="" issued.="" the="" sole="" source="" cited="" by="" mannesmann="" for="" this="" alleged="" factual="" information="" is="" a="" letter="" submitted="" to="" the="" department="" on="" november="" 20,="" 1997,="" one="" month="" after="" the="" deadline="" for="" submissions="" of="" factual="" information.="" therefore,="" the="" petitioners="" argue="" that="" because="" mannesmann's="" factual="" information="" is="" untimely,="" the="" department="" should="" not="" consider="" it="" in="" its="" final="" results.="" department's="" position:="" we="" agree="" with="" the="" respondents="" that="" a="" clerical="" error="" was="" made="" in="" calculating="" the="" benefit="" to="" the="" borusan="" group="" from="" the="" freight="" program.="" in="" calculating="" the="" ``adjusted''="" denominator,="" the="" department="" did="" make="" a="" typographical="" error.="" we="" have="" now="" corrected="" the="" error="" and="" calculated="" a="" benefit="" of="" 2.43="" percent="" ad="" valorem="" for="" the="" borusan="" group.="" we="" also="" agree="" with="" the="" respondents="" that="" we="" incorrectly="" calculated="" the="" denominator="" for="" total="" exports="" of="" the="" subject="" merchandise="" to="" the="" united="" states="" for="" mannesmann.="" in="" instances="" where="" the="" foreign="" exchange="" difference="" was="" a="" positive="" amount="" it="" was="" deducted,="" therefore,="" in="" instances="" where="" the="" foreign="" exchange="" difference="" is="" denoted="" as="" a="" negative="" amount,="" which="" was="" the="" case="" for="" mannesmann,="" the="" amount="" should="" be="" added="" back="" to="" the="" total="" sales="" figure.="" see="" pipe="" and="" tube="" and="" line="" pipe="" 1995.="" we="" [[page="" 18891]]="" disagree="" with="" the="" petitioners="" that="" the="" respondents'="" comment="" is="" an="" untimely="" submission="" of="" factual="" information.="" the="" calculations="" were="" based="" on="" information="" that="" was="" requested="" by="" the="" department.="" we="" have="" now="" corrected="" the="" calculation="" and="" obtained="" a="" net="" countervailable="" subsidy="" under="" the="" freight="" program="" of="" 3.28="" percent="" ad="" valorem="" for="" mannesmann.="" final="" results="" of="" reviews="" in="" accordance="" with="" 19="" cfr="" 355.22(c)(4)(ii),="" we="" calculated="" an="" individual="" subsidy="" rate="" for="" each="" producer/exporter="" subject="" to="" these="" administrative="" reviews.="" for="" the="" period="" january="" 1,="" 1996="" through="" december="" 31,="" 1996,="" we="" determine="" the="" net="" subsidy="" to="" be="" as="" follows:="" ------------------------------------------------------------------------="" rate="" manufacturer/exporter="" of="" pipe="" and="" tube="" (percent)="" ------------------------------------------------------------------------="" borusan="" group................................................="" 3.10="" mannesmann...................................................="" 3.73="" ------------------------------------------------------------------------="" we="" will="" instruct="" the="" u.s.="" customs="" service="" (``customs'')="" to="" assess="" countervailing="" duties="" as="" indicated="" above.="" the="" department="" will="" also="" instruct="" customs="" to="" collect="" cash="" deposits="" of="" estimated="" countervailing="" duties="" in="" the="" percentages="" detailed="" above="" of="" the="" f.o.b.="" invoice="" price="" on="" all="" shipments="" of="" each="" class="" or="" kind="" of="" merchandise="" from="" reviewed="" companies,="" entered,="" or="" withdrawn="" from="" warehouse,="" for="" consumption="" on="" or="" after="" the="" date="" of="" publication="" of="" the="" final="" results="" of="" these="" reviews.="" because="" the="" uraa="" replaced="" the="" general="" rule="" in="" favor="" of="" a="" country-="" wide="" rate="" with="" a="" general="" rule="" in="" favor="" of="" individual="" rates="" for="" investigated="" and="" reviewed="" companies,="" the="" procedures="" for="" establishing="" countervailing="" duty="" rates,="" including="" those="" for="" non-reviewed="" companies,="" are="" now="" essentially="" the="" same="" as="" those="" in="" antidumping="" cases,="" except="" as="" provided="" for="" in="" sec.="" 777a(e)(2)(b)="" of="" the="" act.="" the="" requested="" review="" will="" normally="" cover="" only="" those="" companies="" specifically="" named.="" see="" 19="" cfr="" 355.22(a).="" pursuant="" to="" 19="" cfr="" 355.22(g),="" for="" all="" companies="" for="" which="" a="" review="" was="" not="" requested,="" duties="" must="" be="" assessed="" at="" the="" cash="" deposit="" rate,="" and="" cash="" deposits="" must="" continue="" to="" be="" collected="" at="" the="" rate="" previously="" ordered.="" as="" such,="" the="" countervailing="" duty="" cash="" deposit="" rate="" applicable="" to="" a="" company="" can="" no="" longer="" change,="" except="" pursuant="" to="" a="" request="" for="" a="" review="" of="" that="" company.="" see="" federal-mogul="" corporation="" and="" the="" torrington="" company="" v.="" united="" states,="" 822="" f.supp.="" 782="" (cit="" 1993);="" floral="" trade="" council="" v.="" united="" states,="" 822="" f.supp.="" 766="" (cit="" 1993)="" (interpreting="" 19="" cfr="" 353.22(e),="" the="" antidumping="" regulation="" on="" automatic="" assessment,="" which="" is="" identical="" to="" 19="" cfr="" 355.22(g)).="" therefore,="" the="" cash="" deposit="" rates="" for="" all="" companies="" except="" those="" covered="" by="" these="" reviews="" will="" be="" unchanged="" by="" the="" results="" of="" these="" reviews.="" we="" will="" instruct="" customs="" to="" continue="" to="" collect="" cash="" deposits="" for="" non-reviewed="" companies="" at="" the="" most="" recent="" company-specific="" or="" country-="" wide="" rate="" applicable="" to="" the="" company.="" accordingly,="" the="" cash="" deposit="" rates="" that="" will="" be="" applied="" to="" non-reviewed="" companies="" covered="" by="" this="" order="" will="" be="" the="" rate="" for="" that="" company="" established="" in="" the="" most="" recently="" completed="" administrative="" proceeding="" conducted="" under="" the="" uraa.="" if="" such="" a="" review="" has="" not="" been="" conducted,="" the="" rate="" established="" in="" the="" most="" recently="" completed="" administrative="" proceeding="" pursuant="" to="" the="" statutory="" provisions="" that="" were="" in="" effect="" prior="" to="" the="" uraa="" amendments="" is="" applicable.="" see="" certain="" welded="" carbon="" steel="" pipe="" and="" tube="" products="" from="" turkey;="" final="" results="" of="" countervailing="" duty="" administrative="" reviews,="" 53="" fr="" 9791.="" these="" rates="" shall="" apply="" to="" all="" non-reviewed="" companies="" until="" a="" review="" of="" a="" company="" assigned="" these="" rates="" is="" requested.="" in="" addition,="" for="" the="" period="" january="" 1,="" 1996="" through="" december="" 31,="" 1996,="" the="" assessment="" rates="" applicable="" to="" all="" non-reviewed="" companies="" covered="" by="" this="" order="" are="" the="" cash="" deposit="" rates="" in="" effect="" at="" the="" time="" of="" entry.="" this="" notice="" serves="" as="" a="" reminder="" to="" parties="" subject="" to="" administrative="" protective="" order="" (apo)="" of="" their="" responsibility="" concerning="" the="" disposition="" of="" proprietary="" information="" disclosed="" under="" apo="" in="" accordance="" with="" 19="" cfr="" 355.34(d).="" timely="" written="" notification="" of="" return/destruction="" of="" apo="" materials="" or="" conversion="" to="" judicial="" protective="" order="" is="" hereby="" requested.="" failure="" to="" comply="" with="" the="" regulations="" and="" the="" terms="" of="" an="" apo="" is="" a="" sanctionable="" violation.="" these="" administrative="" reviews="" are="" issued="" and="" published="" in="" accordance="" with="" sections="" 751(a)(1)="" and="" 777(i)(1)="" of="" the="" act="" (19="" u.s.c.="" 1675(a)(1)).="" dated:="" april="" 8,="" 1998.="" robert="" s.="" larussa,="" assistant="" secretary="" for="" import="" administration.="" [fr="" doc.="" 98-10168="" filed="" 4-15-98;="" 8:45="" am]="" billing="" code="" 3510-ds-p="">

Document Information

Effective Date:
4/16/1998
Published:
04/16/1998
Department:
International Trade Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of final results of countervailing duty administrative reviews.
Document Number:
98-10168
Dates:
April 16, 1998.
Pages:
18885-18891 (7 pages)
Docket Numbers:
C-489-502
PDF File:
98-10168.pdf