95-8822. Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 73 (Monday, April 17, 1995)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 19155-19157]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-8822]
    
    
    
    ========================================================================
    Rules and Regulations
                                                    Federal Register
    ________________________________________________________________________
    
    This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
    having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
    to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
    under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
    
    The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
    Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
    week.
    
    ========================================================================
    
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 73 / Monday, April 17, 1995 / Rules 
    and Regulations
    
    [[Page 19155]]
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 95-NM-41-AD; Amendment 39-9196; AD 95-08-07]
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that 
    is applicable to all Airbus Model A310 series airplanes. This action 
    requires measurement of the force required to move the interior control 
    handle of the emergency exit doors, and various follow-on corrective 
    actions, if necessary. This amendment is prompted by a report that, 
    during routine maintenance, excessive force was required to lift the 
    interior control handle of the emergency exit door. The actions 
    specified in this AD are intended to prevent impeding passenger 
    evacuation during an emergency due to difficulty in lifting the 
    interior control handle that is used to open the emergency exit door.
    
    DATES: Effective May 2, 1995.
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of May 2, 1995.
        Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or 
    before June 16, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-103, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 95-NM-41-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington 98055-4056.
        The service information referenced in this AD may be obtained from 
    Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, 
    France. This information may be examined at the FAA, Transport Airplane 
    Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the 
    Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 
    700, Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Slotte, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Standardization Branch, ANM-113, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 
    1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (206) 
    227-2797; fax (206) 227-1320.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Direction Generale de l'Aviation Civile 
    (DGAC), which is the airworthiness authority for France, recently 
    notified the FAA that an unsafe condition may exist on all Airbus Model 
    A310 series airplanes. The DGAC advises that one operator found, during 
    routine maintenance, that an excessive amount of force was required to 
    lift the interior control handle, which opens the left-hand emergency 
    exit door. Investigation revealed that the seizure of two Teflon-coated 
    bearings on the lower shaft of the mechanism inside that door caused 
    the control handle of that emergency exit door to be difficult to lift. 
    This condition, if not corrected, could impede passenger evacuation 
    during an emergency due to difficulty in lifting the interior control 
    handle that is used to open the emergency exit door.
        Airbus has issued All Operators Telex (AOT) 52 08, Revision 1, 
    dated December 1, 1994, which describes procedures for measurement of 
    the force required to move the interior control handle of the emergency 
    exit doors, a one-time functional test of the emergency exit doors to 
    measure the amount of force required to open the doors. Additionally, 
    for doors on which the force required to open the door exceeds a 
    certain limit, this AOT describes procedures for a visual inspection to 
    detect discrepancies of the mechanism inside the door, and replacement 
    of bearings, if necessary. The French DGAC classified this AOT as 
    mandatory and issued French airworthiness directive 94-270-172(B), 
    dated December 7, 1994, in order to assure the continued airworthiness 
    of these airplanes in France.
        This airplane model is manufactured in France and is type 
    certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of 
    Sec. 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and the 
    applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this 
    bilateral airworthiness agreement, the French DGAC has kept the FAA 
    informed of the situation described above. The FAA has examined the 
    findings of the French DGAC, reviewed all available information, and 
    determined that AD action is necessary for products of this type design 
    that are certificated for operation in the United States.
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop on other airplanes of the same type design registered 
    in the United States, this AD is being issued to prevent impeding 
    passenger evacuation during an emergency due to difficulty in lifting 
    the interior control handle that is used to open the emergency exit 
    door. This AD requires measurement of the force required to move the 
    interior control handle of the emergency exit door. Additionally this 
    AD contains several ``on condition'' requirements, including a one-time 
    functional test of the emergency exit doors to measure the amount of 
    force required to open the door, a visual inspection to detect 
    discrepancies of the mechanism inside each emergency exit door, and 
    replacement of the bearings on the lower shaft of the mechanism inside 
    the door. The actions are required to be accomplished in accordance 
    with the AOT described previously.
        This AD also requires that certain discrepancies found be repaired 
    in accordance with a method approved by the FAA. Additionally, this AD 
    requires that operators submit a report of the findings of 
    discrepancies to Airbus Industrie.
        This is considered to be interim action until final action is 
    identified, at which time the FAA may consider further rulemaking.
        As a result of recent communications with the Air Transport 
    Association (ATA) of America, the FAA has learned that, in general, 
    some operators may misunderstand the legal effect of AD's on airplanes 
    that are identified in the applicability provision of the AD, but that 
    have been altered or repaired in the area addressed by the AD. The FAA 
    [[Page 19156]] points out that all airplanes identified in the 
    applicability provision of an AD are legally subject to the AD. If an 
    airplane has been altered or repaired in the affected area in such a 
    way as to affect compliance with the AD, the owner or operator is 
    required to obtain FAA approval for an alternative method of compliance 
    with the AD, in accordance with the paragraph of each AD that provides 
    for such approvals. A note has been included in this rule to clarify 
    this long-standing requirement.
        Since a situation exists that requires the immediate adoption of 
    this regulation, it is found that notice and opportunity for prior 
    public comment hereon are impracticable, and that good cause exists for 
    making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Although this action is in the form of a final rule that involves 
    requirements affecting flight safety and, thus, was not preceded by 
    notice and an opportunity for public comment, comments are invited on 
    this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by 
    submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire. 
    Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number and be submitted 
    in triplicate to the address specified under the caption ADDRESSES. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments will 
    be considered, and this rule may be amended in light of the comments 
    received. Factual information that supports the commenter's ideas and 
    suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of the 
    AD action and determining whether additional rulemaking action would be 
    needed.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might 
    suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be 
    available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the 
    Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A report that 
    summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this 
    AD will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this rule must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket Number 95-NM-41-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        The FAA has determined that this regulation is an emergency 
    regulation that must be issued immediately to correct an unsafe 
    condition in aircraft, and that it is not a ``significant regulatory 
    action'' under Executive Order 12866. It has been determined further 
    that this action involves an emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory 
    Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). If it is 
    determined that this emergency regulation otherwise would be 
    significant under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures, a final 
    regulatory evaluation will be prepared and placed in the Rules Docket. 
    A copy of it, if filed, may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the 
    location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. App. 1354(a), 1421 and 1423; 49 U.S.C. 
    106(g); and 14 CFR 11.89.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    95-08-07 Airbus Industrie: Amendment 39-9196. Docket 95-NM-41-AD.
    
        Applicability: All Model A310 series airplanes, certificated in 
    any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must use the authority 
    provided in paragraph (e) to request approval from the FAA. This 
    approval may address either no action, if the current configuration 
    eliminates the unsafe condition; or different actions necessary to 
    address the unsafe condition described in this AD. Such a request 
    should include an assessment of the effect of the changed 
    configuration on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD. In no 
    case does the presence of any modification, alteration, or repair 
    remove any airplane from the applicability of this AD.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent impeding evacuation during an emergency due to seized 
    bearings on the lower shaft of the mechanism inside the emergency 
    exit door, which would make the door control handle difficult to 
    lift, accomplish the following:
        (a) Within 60 days after the effective date of this AD, measure 
    the amount of force required to move the interior control handle of 
    the emergency exit doors to, in accordance with Airbus All Operators 
    Telex (AOT) 52 08, Revision 1, dated December 1, 1994.
        (b) If the force required to move the interior control handle of 
    the door is equal to or does not exceed 20 daN (45 foot-pounds), no 
    further action is required by this paragraph for that door.
        (c) If the force required to move the interior control handle of 
    the door exceeds 20 daN (45 foot-pounds), prior to further flight, 
    perform a full functional test of the emergency exit doors to 
    measure the amount of force required to open the doors, in 
    accordance with the AOT.
        (1) If the force required to open the door is equal to or does 
    not exceed 20 daN (45 foot-pounds), no further action is required by 
    this paragraph for that door.
        (2) If the force required to open the door exceeds 20 daN (45 
    foot-pounds), prior to further flight, perform a visual inspection 
    to detect discrepancies of the mechanism inside the door, in 
    accordance with the AOT.
        (i) If no discrepancy is found, prior to further flight, replace 
    seized bearings with new or serviceable bearings, in accordance with 
    the AOT.
        (ii) If any discrepancy is found, prior to further flight, 
    repair the discrepancy in accordance with a method approved by the 
    Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113, FAA, Transport Airplane 
    Directorate.
        (d) Within 10 days after accomplishing the inspection required 
    by paragraph (a) of this AD, submit a report of the findings of 
    discrepancies to the Airbus Industrie, Engineering Services, 
    Attention: Mr. R. Filaquier, AI/SE E121, 1 Rond Point Maurice 
    Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. Information collection 
    requirements contained in this regulation have been approved by the 
    Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the provisions of the 
    Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq) and have 
    been assigned OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
        (e) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113. 
    Operators shall submit their requests through [[Page 19157]] an 
    appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add 
    comments and then send it to the Manager, Standardization Branch, 
    ANM-113.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Standardization Branch, ANM-113.
    
        (f) Special flight permits may be issued for non-revenue bearing 
    flights in accordance with Secs. 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the 
    airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD can be 
    accomplished.
        (g) The measurements, functional test, inspections, and 
    replacement shall be done in accordance with Airbus All Operators 
    Telex 52 08, Revision 1, dated December 1, 1994. This incorporation 
    by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in 
    accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be 
    obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 
    Blagnac Cedex, France. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport 
    Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or 
    at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, 
    NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
        (h) This amendment becomes effective on May 2, 1995.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 5, 1995.
    S.R. Miller,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 95-8822 Filed 4-14-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
5/2/1995
Published:
04/17/1995
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule; request for comments.
Document Number:
95-8822
Dates:
Effective May 2, 1995.
Pages:
19155-19157 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 95-NM-41-AD, Amendment 39-9196, AD 95-08-07
PDF File:
95-8822.pdf
CFR: (2)
14 CFR 21.29
14 CFR 39.13