95-9351. Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9 Series Airplanes and C-9 (Military) Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 73 (Monday, April 17, 1995)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 19188-19190]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-9351]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 95-NM-36-AD]
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9 Series 
    Airplanes and C-9 (Military) Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes the adoption of a new airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Model DC-9 series 
    airplanes and C-9 (military) airplanes. This proposal would require an 
    inspection of the driver links of the thrust reverser door to determine 
    whether the driver links are chamfered, an inspection to detect damage 
    of the overcenter links, and follow-on corrective actions, if 
    necessary; and replacement or rework of the driver links. This proposal 
    is prompted by reports of a thrust reverser door that failed to operate 
    properly due to improperly manufactured (missing chamfers on the) 
    driver links. The actions specified by the proposed AD are intended to 
    prevent damage to the overcenter links due to missing chamfers on the 
    driver links, which may result in uncommanded opening of the thrust 
    reverser door, and subsequently, adversely affecting controllability of 
    the airplane.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received by June 9, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-103, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 95-NM-36-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this location 
    between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
    holidays.
        The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be 
    obtained from McDonnell Douglas Corporation, P.O. Box 1771, Long Beach, 
    California 90801-1771, Attention: Business Unit Manager, Technical 
    Administrative Support, Dept. L51, M.C. 2-98. This information may be 
    examined at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, 
    SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 
    Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, 
    Lakewood, California.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Baitoo, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Propulsion Branch, ANM-140L, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Los 
    Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, 
    Lakewood, California 90712; telephone (310) 627-5245; fax (310) 627-
    5210.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with 
    the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket Number 95-NM-36-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-103, Attention: Rules 
    Docket No. 95-NM-36-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 
    98055-4056.
    
    Discussion
    
        Recently, an operator of McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9 series 
    airplanes reported that the thrust reverser door would not close after 
    an airplane landed. Subsequently, this same operator reported that the 
    thrust reverser door, on the same airplane, opened partially after 
    takeoff. Investigation revealed that driver links of the thrust 
    reverser on this airplane were bent or broken, apparently due to a 
    manufacturing defect. These driver links were missing chamfers, which 
    caused damage to the adjoining overcenter links, and eventually led to 
    the failure of the overcenter link assembly. This condition, if not 
    corrected, could result in uncommanded opening of the thrust reverser 
    door, which may adversely affect controllability of the airplane.
        The FAA has reviewed and approved McDonnell Douglas DC-9 Alert 
    Service Bulletin A78-67, dated February 27, 1995, which describes 
    procedures for a one-time visual inspection of the driver links of the 
    thrust reverser door to determine whether the driver links are 
    chamfered. For driver links that are not chamfered, this alert service 
    bulletin describes procedures for removal of the driver link and an 
    inspection to determine serviceability of the driver link. This alert 
    service bulletin also describes procedures for a one-time visual 
    inspection to detect damage of the overcenter links, and an inspection 
    to detect damage of the drive mechanism, if necessary. Additionally, 
    this alert service bulletin describes procedures for replacement or 
    rework of the driver links.
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop on other products of this same type design, the 
    proposed AD would require a one-time visual inspection of the driver 
    links of the thrust reverser door to determine whether the driver links 
    are chamfered, and a one-time [[Page 19189]] visual inspection to 
    detect damage of the overcenter links, and follow-on corrective 
    actions, if necessary; and replacement or rework of the driver links. 
    The actions would be required to be accomplished in accordance with the 
    alert service bulletin described previously.
        The proposed AD would also require that operators submit a report 
    of the findings of the inspection required by this proposal. The 
    information obtained from these reports will enable the FAA to 
    determine how widespread the problem is in the fleet and if additional 
    action is warranted.
        As a result of recent communications with the Air Transport 
    Association (ATA) of America, the FAA has learned that, in general, 
    some operators may misunderstand the legal effect of AD's on airplanes 
    that are identified in the applicability provision of the AD, but that 
    have been altered or repaired in the area addressed by the AD. The FAA 
    points out that all airplanes identified in the applicability provision 
    of an AD are legally subject to the AD. If an airplane has been altered 
    or repaired in the affected area in such a way as to affect compliance 
    with the AD, the owner or operator is required to obtain FAA approval 
    for an alternative method of compliance with the AD, in accordance with 
    the paragraph of each AD that provides for such approvals. A note has 
    been included in this notice to clarify this long-standing requirement.
        There are approximately 892 airplanes of the affected design in the 
    worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 557 airplanes of U.S. registry 
    would be affected by this proposed AD, that it would take approximately 
    1 work hour per airplane to accomplish the proposed inspections and 
    approximately 10 work hours per airplane to accomplish the proposed 
    replacement/rework, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work 
    hour. Required replacement/rework parts would cost approximately $4,100 
    per airplane. Based on these figures, the total cost impact of the 
    proposed AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $2,651,320, or $4,760 
    per airplane.
        The total cost impact figure discussed above is based on 
    assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the proposed 
    requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish 
    those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted.
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed 
    regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
    Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT 
    Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 
    and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact, 
    positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under 
    the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft 
    regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the 
    Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules 
    Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. App. 1354(a), 1421 and 1423; 49 U.S.C. 
    106(g); and 14 CFR 11.89.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    McDonnell Douglas: Docket 95-NM-36-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model DC-9-10, -20, -30, -40, and -50 series 
    airplanes, and C-9 (military) airplanes, as listed in McDonnell 
    Douglas DC-9 Alert Service Bulletin A78-67, dated February 27, 1995, 
    certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must use the authority 
    provided in paragraph (e) to request approval from the FAA. This 
    approval may address either no action, if the current configuration 
    eliminates the unsafe condition; or different actions necessary to 
    address the unsafe condition described in this AD. Such a request 
    should include an assessment of the effect of the changed 
    configuration on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD. In no 
    case does the presence of any modification, alteration, or repair 
    remove any airplane from the applicability of this AD.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent uncommanded opening of the thrust reverser door, 
    which may adversely affect controllability of the airplane, 
    accomplish the following:
        (a) Within 3 months after the effective date of this AD, perform 
    a visual inspection of the actuating mechanisms of the upper and 
    lower doors of the thrust reverser on the left and right engines to 
    determine whether the driver links are chamfered, in accordance with 
    McDonnell Douglas DC-9 Alert Service Bulletin A78-67, dated February 
    27, 1995.
        (1) If all the driver links are chamfered, prior to further 
    flight, perform a visual inspection to detect damage of the 
    overcenter links (including the bearings, races, and attaching 
    hardware), in accordance with the alert service bulletin.
        (i) If no damage to the overcenter links is detected, no further 
    action is required by this paragraph.
        (ii) If any damage to the overcenter links is detected, prior to 
    further flight, replace the damaged overcenter links with new or 
    serviceable overcenter links.
        (iii) If any damage to the bearings, races, or attaching 
    hardware of the overcenter links is detected, prior to further 
    flight, perform a visual inspection to detect damage of the drive 
    mechanism of the thrust reverser, in accordance with the alert 
    service bulletin. If any damage to the drive mechanism is detected, 
    prior to further flight, repair or replace the damaged parts with 
    new or serviceable parts, in accordance with the Chapter 78 of the 
    DC-9 Overhaul Manual.
        (2) If any driver link is not chamfered, prior to further 
    flight, remove the driver link and perform dimensional and 
    flourescent penetrant inspections to determine serviceability of the 
    driver link, in accordance with the alert service bulletin.
        (i) If the driver link is serviceable, prior to further flight, 
    machine chamfer the driver link, or replace the driver link with a 
    new or serviceable part, in accordance with the alert service 
    bulletin.
        (ii) If the driver link is not serviceable, prior to further 
    flight, replace it with a new or serviceable driver link, in 
    accordance with the alert service bulletin.
        (b) Within 3 months after the effective date of this AD, perform 
    a visual inspection to detect damage of the overcenter links 
    (including the bearings, races, and attaching hardware, in 
    accordance with the McDonnell Douglas DC-9 Alert Service Bulletin 
    A78-67, dted February 27, 1995.
        (1) If no damage to the overcenter links is detected, no further 
    action is required by this paragraph.
        (2) If any damage to the overcenter links is detected, prior to 
    further flight, replace the damaged overcenter links with new or 
    serviceable overcenter links.
        (3) If any damage to the bearings, races, or attaching hardware 
    of the overcenter links is detected, prior to further flight, 
    perform a [[Page 19190]] visual inspection to detect damage of the 
    drive mechanism of the thrust reverser, in accordance with the alert 
    service bulletin. If any damage to the drive mechanism is detected, 
    prior to further flight, repair or replace the damaged parts with 
    new or serviceable parts, in accordance with the Chapter 78 of the 
    DC-9 Overhaul Manual.
        (c) Within 10 days after accomplishing the visual inspection of 
    the driver links of the thrust reverser door to determine whether 
    the driver links are chamfered, as required by paragraph (a) of this 
    AD, submit a report of the inspection results (both positive and 
    negative findings) to the Manager, FAA, Transport Airplane 
    Directorate, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 3960 
    Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712; telephone (310) 
    627-5245; fax (310) 627-5210; Attention: Robert Baitoo. Information 
    collection requirements contained in this regulation have been 
    approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the 
    provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et 
    seq.) and have been assigned OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
        (d) As of the effective date of this AD, no person shall 
    install, on any airplane, a driver link or overcenter link assembly 
    of a thrust reverser that has not been previously inspected, and 
    replaced or reworked, in accordance with McDonnell Douglas DC-9 
    Alert Service Bulletin A78-67, dated February 27, 1995.
        (e) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO, FAA, Transport 
    Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their requests through 
    an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add 
    comments and then send it to the Manager, Los Angeles ACO.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.
    
        (f) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    Secs. 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 
    21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the 
    requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 10, 1995.
    S.R. Miller,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 95-9351 Filed 4-14-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/17/1995
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
95-9351
Dates:
Comments must be received by June 9, 1995.
Pages:
19188-19190 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 95-NM-36-AD
PDF File:
95-9351.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13