96-9471. Sodium Salt of Acifluorfen; Pesticide Tolerance  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 75 (Wednesday, April 17, 1996)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 16740-16742]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-9471]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    40 CFR Part 180
    
    [PP 0E3821/P649; FRL-5356-6]
    RIN 2070-AB18
    
    
    Sodium Salt of Acifluorfen; Pesticide Tolerance
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    
    [[Page 16741]]
    
    
    ACTION: Proposed Rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: EPA proposes to establish a tolerance for combined residues of 
    the herbicide sodium salt of acifluorfen (also referred to in this 
    document as acifluorfen) in or on the raw agricultural commodity 
    strawberry. The proposed regulation to establish a maximum permissible 
    level for residues of the herbicide was requested in a petition 
    submitted by the Interregional Research Project No. 4 (IR-4).
    
    DATES: Comments, identified by the document control number [PP 0E3821/
    P649], must be received on or before May 17, 1996.
    
    ADDRESSES: By mail, submit written comments to: Public Response and 
    Program Resources Branch, Field Operations Division (7506C), Office of 
    Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., 
    Washington, DC 20460. In person, bring comments to: Rm. 1132 CM #2, 
    1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202.
        Comments and data may also be submitted to OPP by sending 
    electronic mail (e-mail) to: opp-docket@epamail.epa.gov. Electronic 
    comments must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the use of special 
    characters and any form of encryption. Comments and data will also be 
    accepted on disks in WordPerfect 5.1 file format or ASCII file format. 
    All comments and data in electronic form must be identified by the 
    docket number [PP 0E3821/P649]. Electronic comments on this proposed 
    rule may be filed online at many Federal Depository Libraries. 
    Additional information on electronic submissions can be found in the 
    ``SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION'' section of this document.
        Information submitted as a comment concerning this document may be 
    claimed confidential by marking any part or all of that information as 
    ``Confidential Business Information'' (CBI). CBI should not be 
    submitted through e-mail. Information marked as CBI will not be 
    disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 
    2. A copy of the comment that does not contain CBI must be submitted 
    for inclusion in the public record. Information not marked confidential 
    may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice. All written 
    comments will be available for public inspection in Rm. 1132 at the 
    Virginia address given above, from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 
    Friday, excluding legal holidays.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Hoyt L. Jamerson, 
    Registration Division (7505W), Office of Pesticide Programs, 
    Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St. SW., Washington, DC 20460. 
    Office location and telephone number: Sixth Floor, Crystal Station #1, 
    2800 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202, 703-308-8783.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Interregional Research Project No. 4 
    (IR-4), New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station, P.O. Box 231, 
    Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, has submitted pesticide 
    petition (PP) 0E3821 to EPA on behalf of the Agricultural Experiment 
    Stations of Alabama, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Florida, 
    Indiana, Maryland, Michigan, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, 
    Oregon, Tennessee, Virginia, and Washington. This petition requested 
    that the Administrator, pursuant to section 408(e) of the Federal Food, 
    Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 346a(e)) propose the establishment of 
    a tolerance for combined residues of the sodium salt of acifluorfen 
    (sodium 5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoic acid) 
    and its metabolites (the corresponding acid, methyl ester and amino 
    analogues) in or on the raw agricultural commodity strawberry at 0.05 
    part per million (ppm).
        The scientific data submitted in the petition and other relevant 
    material have been evaluated. The toxicological data considered in 
    support of the proposed tolerance include:
        1. A 2-year feeding study in dogs fed diets containing 0, 50, 300, 
    or 1,800 ppm with a no-observed-effect-level (NOEL) of 50 ppm 
    (equivalent to 1.25 mg/kg/day). Blood coagulation was observed in test 
    animals at the 300 ppm dose level.
        2. A 2-generation reproduction study in rats fed diets containing 
    0, 25, 500 or 2,500 ppm with no adverse effect on adult reproductive 
    performance observed under the conditions of the study. The NOEL was 
    established at 25 ppm (equivalent to 1.25 mg/kg of body weight/day) 
    based on decreased viability and increased incidence of kidney lesions 
    in high dose offspring.
        3. A developmental toxicity study in rabbits given oral gavage 
    doses of 0, 3, 12, or 36 mg/kg/day with no developmental toxicity 
    observed at any of the dose levels tested.
        4. A developmental toxicity study in rats given oral gavage doses 
    of 0, 20, 90, or 180 mg/kg/day with a NOEL for developmental toxicity 
    (reduced mean fetal weight) of 20 mg/kg/day. The NOEL for maternal 
    toxicity was established at 90 mg/kg/day based on reduced body weight 
    at the highest dose tested.
        5. A 2-year carcinogenicity study in rats fed diets containing 0, 
    25, 150, 500, 2,500, or 5,000 ppm with a NOEL of 500 ppm (equivalent to 
    25 mg/kg/day). The lowest-observed-effect level was established at 
    2,500 ppm (equivalent to 125 mg/kg/day) based on increased liver enzyme 
    changes in male and female rats and renal changes (nephritis) in male 
    rats.
        6. Acifluorfen produced positive results for gene mutation in a 
    mitotic recombination assay in yeast cells and a dominant lethal assay 
    in fruit fly. The chemical was negative in a structural chromosome 
    aberration test in bone marrow cells and an unscheduled DNA synthesis 
    test in rat hepatocytes.
        7. A metabolism study in mice shows that acifluorfen is excreted 
    primarily as the parent compound within 4 days of ingestion.
        8. An 18-month carcinogenicity study in B6C3F1 mice fed diets 
    containing 0, 625, 1,250, or 2,500 ppm with statistically significant 
    positive trends for liver tumors (adenomas, carcinomas, and adenomas/
    carcinomas combined) and stomach tumors (papillomas) in both male and 
    in female mice. These tumor types were significantly increased at the 
    highest dose level tested (2,500 ppm) in male and female mice, and 
    liver tumors were also significantly increased at the lowest dose level 
    tested (625 ppm) in male mice.
        9. A 2-year carcinogenicity study in CD-1 mice fed diets containing 
    0, 7.5, 45, or 270 ppm with a statistically significant increase in the 
    total number of liver tumors (primarily adenomas) in high dose (270 
    ppm) female mice. No significant increase in liver tumors were observed 
    in male mice at any feeding level tested. The highest dose tested (270 
    ppm) did not approximate a maximum tolerated dose in male and female 
    mice.
        Based on a weight-of-evidence determination, OPP's Health Effects 
    Division, Carcinogenicity Peer Review Committee (CPRC) has classified 
    acifluorfen as Group B2 carcinogen (probable human carcinogen). This 
    decision, which is in accordance with proposed Agency guidelines 
    published in the Federal Register of November 23, 1984 (49 FR 46294), 
    was based primarily on evidence of an increased number of malignant, or 
    combined benign and malignant, liver tumors in multiple experiments 
    involving two different strains of mice. Acifluorfen also produced 
    uncommon stomach tumors in male and female B6C3F1 mice. Other 
    structurally related diethyl-ether pesticides have been shown to
    
    [[Page 16742]]
    
    produce liver tumors in mice. In addition, mutagenicity studies show 
    evidence of mutagenic activity, but not in mammalian cell systems.
        The upper-bound carcinogenic risk from dietary exposure to 
    acifluorfen was calculated using a potency factor (Q*) of 0.107 
    (mg/kg/day)-1 and dietary exposure as estimated by the Anticipated 
    Residue Contribution (ARC) for existing tolerances and the proposed 
    tolerance for strawberry. The upper-bound carcinogenic risk from 
    established and proposed uses is calculated at 5.6  x  10-7. The 
    proposed use on strawberry accounts for 1.9  x  10-8 of the total 
    cancer risk, which is a negligible increase in risk.
        The RfD for acifluorfen is established at 0.013 mg/kg of body 
    weight/day, based on a NOEL of 1.25 mg/kg body weight/day and an 
    uncertainty factor of 100. The NOEL is taken from the 2-generation rat 
    reproduction study in which decreased survival and increased incidence 
    of kidney lesions were observed in the offspring of rats fed higher 
    dose levels. The ARC for the overall U.S. population from established 
    tolerances and the proposed use on strawberry utilizes less than 1 
    percent of the RfD. In addition, less than 1 percent of the RfD is 
    utilized for all population subgroups for which EPA has dietary 
    consumption data. EPA generally has no cause for concern for exposures 
    below 100 percent of the RfD.
        The nature of the residue is adequately understood for the purpose 
    of the proposed tolerance and an adequate analytical method, gas 
    chromatography, is available for enforcement purposes. An analytical 
    method for enforcing this tolerance has been published in the Pesticide 
    Analytical Manual (PAM), Vol. II. No secondary residues in meat, milk, 
    poultry, or eggs are expected since strawberry are not considered a 
    livestock feed commodity. There are presently no actions pending 
    against the continued registration of this chemical.
        Based on the information and data considered, the Agency has 
    determined that the tolerance established by amending 40 CFR part 180 
    would protect the public health. Therefore, it is proposed that the 
    tolerance be established as set forth below.
        Any person who has registered or submitted an application for 
    registration of a pesticide, under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, 
    and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) as amended, which contains any of the 
    ingredients listed herein, may request within 30 days after publication 
    of this notice in the Federal Register that this rulemaking proposal be 
    referred to an Advisory Committee in accordance with section 408(e) of 
    the FFDCA.
        A record has been established for this rulemaking under docket 
    number [PP 0E3821/P649] (including comments and data submitted 
    electronically as described below). A public version of this record, 
    including printed, paper versions of electronic comments, which does 
    not include any information claimed as CBI, is available for inspection 
    from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal 
    holidays. The public record is located in Room 1132 of the Public 
    Response and Program Resources Branch, Field Operations Division 
    (7506C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 
    Crystal Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA.
        Electronic comments can be sent directly to EPA at:
    
        opp-Docket@epamail.epa.gov
    
        Electronic comments must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the 
    use of special characters and any form of encryption.
        The official record for this rulemaking, as well as the public 
    version, as described above will be kept in paper form. Accordingly, 
    EPA will transfer all comments received electronically into printed, 
    paper form as they are received and will place the paper copies in the 
    official rulemaking record which will also include all comments 
    submitted directly in writing. The official rulemaking record is the 
    paper record maintained at the Virginia address in ``ADDRESSES'' at the 
    beginning of this document.
        Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 1993), the Agency 
    must determine whether the regulatory action is ``significant'' and 
    therefore subject to all the requirements of the Executive Order (i.e., 
    Regulatory Impact Analysis, review by the Office of Management and 
    Budget (OMB)). Under section 3(f), the order defines ``significant'' as 
    those actions likely to lead to a rule (1) having an annual effect on 
    the economy of $100 million or more, or adversely and materially 
    affecting a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the 
    environment, public health or safety, or State, local or tribal 
    governments or communities (also known as ``economically 
    significant''); (2) creating serious inconsistency or otherwise 
    interfering with an action taken or planned by another agency; (3) 
    materially altering the budgetary impacts of entitlement, grants, user 
    fees, or loan programs; or (4) raising novel legal or policy issues 
    arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the 
    principles set forth in this Executive Order.
        Pursuant to the terms of this Executive Order, EPA has determined 
    that this rule is not ``significant'' and is therefore not subject to 
    OMB review.
        Pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act 
    (Pub. L. 96-354, 94 Stat. 1164, 5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Administrator 
    has determined that regulations establishing new tolerances or raising 
    tolerance levels or establishing exemptions from tolerance requirements 
    do not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
    small entities. A certification statement to this effect was published 
    in the Federal Register of May 4, 1981 (46 FR 24950).
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
    
        Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
    Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements.
    
        Dated: April 3, 1996.
    
    Susan Lewis,
    
    Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
    
        Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR part 180 be amended as 
    follows:
    
    PART 180--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 371.
    
        2. In Sec. 180.383, the table is amended by adding alphabetically 
    the commodity strawberry, to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 180.383  Sodium salt of acifluorfen; tolerances for residues.
    
    *      *      *
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                      Parts 
                              Commodities                              per  
                                                                     million
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
                      *        *        *        *        *                 
    Strawberry.....................................................    0.05 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    [FR Doc. 96-9471 Filed 4-16-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/17/1996
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed Rule.
Document Number:
96-9471
Dates:
Comments, identified by the document control number [PP 0E3821/ P649], must be received on or before May 17, 1996.
Pages:
16740-16742 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
PP 0E3821/P649, FRL-5356-6
RINs:
2070-AB18
PDF File:
96-9471.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 180.383