94-9293. Redesignation of the Yavapai-Apache Reservation to a PSD Class I Area; State of Arizona  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 74 (Monday, April 18, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-9293]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: April 18, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    40 CFR Part 52
    
    [FRL-4875-2]
    
     
    
    Redesignation of the Yavapai-Apache Reservation to a PSD Class I 
    Area; State of Arizona
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The purpose of this action is to propose approval and seek 
    public comment on the request by the Yavapai-Apache Tribal Council to 
    redesignate the Yavapai-Apache Reservation (``the Reservation'') in the 
    State of Arizona to Class I under EPA's regulations for prevention of 
    significant deterioration of air quality. The Class I designation will 
    result in lowering the allowable increases in ambient concentrations of 
    particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide on the 
    Reservation.
    DATES: Comments and requests for a public hearing must be received on 
    or before May 18, 1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to: Kelly Fortin, Air 
    and Toxics Division (A-5-1), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 75 
    Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901. Requests for a public 
    hearing shall be in writing to the above address and shall state the 
    nature of the issues proposed to be raised in the hearing. Any hearing 
    will be strictly limited to the subject matter of the proposal.
        Supporting information used in developing the proposed rule and 
    materials submitted to EPA relevant to the proposed action are 
    available for public inspection and copying at the docket address 
    listed above during normal business hours. A reasonable fee may be 
    charged for copying.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kelly Fortin, Air and Toxics Division 
    (A-5-1), USEPA, Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-
    3901, (415) 744-1259.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Part C of the Clean Air Act (``the Act'') 
    provides for the prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) of air 
    quality. The intent of this part is to prevent deterioration of 
    existing air quality, particularly in areas considered to be pristine. 
    The Act provides for three basic classifications applicable to all 
    lands of the United States. Associated with each classification are 
    increments which represent the maximum allowable increase in ambient 
    air pollutant concentrations above a baseline concentration. A Class I 
    designation applies to areas of special national or regional value from 
    a natural, scenic, recreational, or historic perspective. The PSD 
    regulations provide special protection for such areas. Class II applies 
    to areas in which pollutant increases accompanying moderate growth 
    would be allowed. Class III applies to those areas in which 
    considerably more air quality deterioration would be considered 
    acceptable.
        Under the 1977 amendments to the Act, all areas of the country that 
    met the National ambient air quality standards were initially 
    designated Class II, except for certain international parks, wilderness 
    areas, national memorial parks, national parks, and any other areas 
    previously designated Class I.1 Section 164 of the Act allows 
    States and Indian governing bodies to reclassify areas under their 
    jurisdiction to accommodate the social, economic, and environmental 
    needs and desires of the local population. Reservations that have 
    previously been reclassified as Class I areas include the Northern 
    Cheyenne, Fort Peck, and Flathead Reservations in Montana and the 
    Spokane Reservation in Washington.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\The 1990 CAA Amendments included provisions to allow the 
    boundaries of existing Federal Class I areas to be expanded, but no 
    new Class I areas were created.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        A Class I redesignation will result in lowering the allowable 
    increases in ambient concentrations of particulate matter, sulfur 
    dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide on the Reservation. Only facilities 
    defined by the PSD regulations, 40 CFR 52.21, as major stationary 
    sources or major modifications are required to perform an air quality 
    impact analysis for Class I and Class II areas. These facilities are 
    typically large industrial sources such as refineries and electric 
    utilities.
        It is important to note that no new permits and no new substantive 
    requirements are applicable as a result of a redesignation to Class I. 
    The same analyses and control technology requirements apply as if the 
    area was designated as Class II. The difference between the two 
    designations, in this case, is that the maximum increase in ambient 
    concentration of a given pollutant2 allowed over a baseline 
    concentration is lower in a Class I area. This affords a Class I area 
    greater protection from the cumulative impacts of many facilities 
    locating in and around the Class I area.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \2\There are currently PSD increments established for nitrogen 
    dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and particulate matter. 40 CFR 52.21(c).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Typically a facility must be upwind of and quite close to a Class I 
    area for it to have a significant impact (greater than 1 microgram per 
    cubic meter). Facilities that are not found to have a significant 
    impact may usually construct without performing a ``full'' (detailed) 
    air quality analysis. Those facilities that may have a significant 
    impact on a Class I area must perform a more detailed air quality 
    analysis and may be required to propose and apply mitigation measures 
    to reduce emissions to a level that will have an insignificant impact 
    on the Class I area.
    
    Yavapai-Apache Request for Redesignation
    
        On December 17, 1993, the Yavapai-Apache Tribal Council (herein 
    referred to as ``the Tribal Council'') submitted to EPA a proposal to 
    redesignate the Yavapai-Apache Reservation from Class II to Class I. 
    With their request, the Tribal Council submitted an Air Quality 
    Redesignation Plan, documentation of public notification, a record of 
    the public hearing held on October 21, 1993, and comments received by 
    the Tribal Council on the proposed redesignation.
        The Yavapai-Apache Reservation is located in the Verde Valley of 
    Central Arizona about 90 miles north of Phoenix and 55 miles south of 
    Flagstaff. The Reservation was established by Executive Order in 1871 
    and is composed of five land parcels, totalling 635 acres, held by the 
    Federal Government as trust lands.
        The main parcel, the Middle Verde Reservation, is approximately 458 
    acres and is located two miles west of Interstate 17. A second parcel, 
    the Camp Verde Reservation, is located approximately five miles 
    southeast of the main parcel, adjacent to the town of Camp Verde, and 
    is forty acres. The Clark Reservation, a parcel of 58.5 acres, is 
    located in Clarkdale, 25 miles northwest of the Middle Verde 
    Reservation. A forth parcel, the Rimrock Reservation, is located in 
    Rimrock about 10 miles east of the main parcel and consists of 3.75 
    acres. The fifth parcel, approximately 75 acres, is located on 
    Interstate 17 near the entrance to the Montezuma Castle National 
    Monument and is intended for commercial development.
    
    Statutory and Regulatory Requirements for Redesignation
    
        Section 164 of the Clean Air Act and Federal regulations set forth 
    at 40 CFR 52.21(g) outline the requirements for redesignation of areas 
    under the PSD program. The Act provides that lands within the exterior 
    boundaries of reservations of federally recognized Indian tribes may be 
    redesignated only by the appropriate Indian Governing Body. Under 
    section 164(b)(2) and 40 CFR 52.21(g)(5), EPA may disapprove a 
    redesignation only if it finds, after notice and opportunity for 
    hearing, that the redesignation does not meet the procedural 
    requirements of section 164 or is a mandatory Class I area that may not 
    be redesignated. The latter does not apply to the area proposed for 
    redesignation. In addition, the Indian Governing Body may resubmit the 
    proposal after correcting any deficiencies noted by the Administrator.
        The procedural requirements for a Class I redesignation by an 
    Indian Governing Body are as follows: (1) At least one public hearing 
    must be conducted in accordance with the requirements set forth at 40 
    CFR 51.102; (2) other States, Indian Governing Bodies, and Federal Land 
    Managers whose lands may be affected by the proposed redesignation must 
    be notified at least 30 days prior to the public hearing; (3) at least 
    30 days prior to the public hearing, a satisfactory description and 
    analysis of the health, environmental, economic, social and energy 
    effects of the proposed redesignation must be prepared and made 
    available for public inspection and be referenced in the public hearing 
    notice; (4) if any Federal lands are included in the redesignation, the 
    redesignating authorities must provide written notice to the 
    appropriate Federal Land Managers and an opportunity to confer and 
    submit written comments and recommendations; (5) the Indian Governing 
    Body must consult with the State(s) in which the Reservation is located 
    and that border the Reservation.
    
    Tribal Council Submittal
    
        The December 17, 1993 request for redesignation includes evidence 
    that all of the statutory and regulatory requirements for redesignation 
    of the Yavapai-Apache Reservation from Class II to Class I have been 
    met by the Yavapai-Apache Tribal Council. The Yavapai-Apache Tribal 
    Council is the Indian Governing Body for the Yavapai-Apache 
    Reservation, and only lands within the exterior boundaries of the 
    Reservation are proposed for redesignation.
        Pursuant to 40 CFR 51.102, the Tribal Council conducted a public 
    hearing on October 21, 1993 at the Clarkdale Community Building in 
    Clarkdale, Arizona. Notice of the hearing was provided to the required 
    parties and numerous other public agencies and interested parties, was 
    posted in public locations, and was provided to national and local 
    media. A description and analysis of the health, environmental, 
    economic, social, and energy effects of the proposed redesignation 
    entitled, ``Yavapai-Apache Tribe Air Quality Redesignation Plan,'' was 
    completed in September 1993, and its availability was announced in the 
    public hearing notices. Evidence that the Tribe consulted with State 
    officials prior to proposing the redesignation is also included in the 
    submittal. Therefore, the documentation submitted by the Tribal Council 
    shows that all statutory and regulatory procedural requirements for 
    redesignation have been met.
    
    Summary of Action
    
        Since EPA's review has not revealed any procedural deficiencies, 
    the redesignation is hereby proposed for approval. The public is 
    invited to comment on whether the Tribal Council has met all the 
    procedural requirements of section 164 of the Act. Comments should be 
    submitted to the address listed in the front of this document. Public 
    comments received by May 18, 1994 will be considered in the final 
    rulemaking action taken by EPA.
    
    Administrative Review
    
        The Office of Management and Budget has exempted this rule from the 
    requirements of section 6 of Executive Order 12866.
        Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., EPA 
    must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of 
    any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604. 
    Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a 
    significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small 
    entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises and 
    government entities with jurisdiction over populations of less than 
    50,000. The proposed action affects only major stationary sources, as 
    defined by 40 CFR 52.21, will not result in any additional requirements 
    for small entities. Therefore, I certify that this action does not have 
    a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
    
        Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Hydrocarbons, 
    Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate 
    matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides.
    
        Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7642.
    
        Dated: April 4, 1994.
    John Wise,
    Acting Regional Administrator.
    [FR Doc. 94-9293 Filed 4-15-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/18/1994
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR).
Document Number:
94-9293
Dates:
Comments and requests for a public hearing must be received on or before May 18, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: April 18, 1994, FRL-4875-2
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 52