96-9671. Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; CASODEXRegister  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 77 (Friday, April 19, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 17308-17309]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-9671]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    [Docket No. 95E-0421]
    
    
    Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent 
    Extension; CASODEX
    
    AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
    
    ACTION: Notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the 
    regulatory review period for CASODEX and is publishing this 
    notice of that determination as required by law. FDA has made the 
    determination because of the submission of an application to the 
    Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the 
    extension of a patent which claims that human drug product.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written comments and petitions should be directed to the 
    Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 
    12420 Parklawn Dr., rm. 1-23, Rockville, MD 20857.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian J. Malkin, Office of Health 
    Affairs (HFY-20), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
    Rockville, MD 20857, 301-443-1382.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term 
    Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug 
    and Patent Term Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100-670) generally provide 
    that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as 
    the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical 
    device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory 
    review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a 
    product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the 
    amount of extension an applicant may receive.
        A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A 
    testing phase and an approval phase. For human drug products, the 
    testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical 
    investigations of the drug becomes effective and runs until the 
    approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial 
    submission of an application to market the human drug product and 
    continues until FDA grants permission to market the drug product. 
    Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward 
    the actual amount of extension that the Commissioner of Patents and 
    Trademarks may award (for example, half the testing phase must be 
    subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before the patent 
    was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a regulatory review 
    period for a human drug product will include all of the testing phase 
    and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
        FDA recently approved for marketing the human drug product 
    CASODEX
    
    [[Page 17309]]
    
    (bicalutamide). CASODEX is indicated for use in combination 
    therapy with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogue 
    for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Subsequent to this 
    approval, the Patent and Trademark Office received a patent term 
    restoration application for CASODEX (U.S. Patent No. 
    4,636,505) from Zeneca Ltd., and the Patent and Trademark Office 
    requested FDA's assistance in determining this patent's eligibility for 
    patent term restoration. In a letter dated February 8, 1996, FDA 
    advised the Patent and Trademark Office that this human drug product 
    had undergone a regulatory review period and that the approval of 
    CASODEX represented the first permitted commercial marketing 
    or use of the product. Shortly thereafter, the Patent and Trademark 
    Office requested that FDA determine the product's regulatory review 
    period.
        FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for 
    CASODEX is 3,059 days. Of this time, 2,673 days occurred 
    during the testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 386 
    days occurred during the approval phase. These periods of time were 
    derived from the following dates:
        1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food, 
    Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective: May 22, 
    1987. FDA has verified the applicant's claim that the date that the 
    investigational new drug application (IND) became effective was on May 
    22, 1987.
        2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to 
    the human drug product under section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, 
    and Cosmetic Act: September 14, 1994. FDA has verified the applicant's 
    claim that the new drug application (NDA) for CASODEX (NDA 
    20-498) was initially submitted on September 14, 1994. -
        3. The date the application was approved: October 14, 1995. FDA has 
    verified the applicant's claim that NDA 20-498 was approved on October 
    14, 1995.
        This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the 
    maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S. 
    Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in 
    its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its 
    application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 1,721 days of 
    patent term extension. -
        Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published is 
    incorrect may, on or before June 18, 1996, submit to the Dockets 
    Management Branch (address above) written comments and ask for a 
    redetermination. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA, 
    on or before October 16, 1996, for a determination regarding whether 
    the applicant for extension acted with due diligence during the 
    regulatory review period. To meet its burden, the petition must contain 
    sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 
    1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the 
    format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
        Comments and petitions should be submitted to the Dockets 
    Management Branch (address above) in three copies (except that 
    individuals may submit single copies) and identified with the docket 
    number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Comments and 
    petitions may be seen in the Dockets Management Branch between 9 a.m. 
    and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
    
        Dated: April 5, 1996.
    Stuart L. Nightingale,
    Associate Commissioner for Health Affairs.
    [FR Doc. 96-9671 Filed 4-18-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/19/1996
Department:
Health and Human Services Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
96-9671
Pages:
17308-17309 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 95E-0421
PDF File:
96-9671.pdf