[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 76 (Thursday, April 20, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 19673-19674]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9708]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[CA 144-3-6972b; FRL-5194-2]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California
State Implementation Plan Revision; Interim Final Determination That
State has Corrected Deficiencies
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Interim final determination.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Elsewhere in today's Federal Register EPA has published a
proposed rulemaking fully approving revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan. The revisions concern South Coast Air Quality
Management District Rule 1164--Semiconductor Manufacturing. The
proposed rulemaking provides the public with an opportunity to comment
on EPA's action approving Rule 1164. Based on the proposed approval,
EPA is making an interim final determination by this action that the
State has corrected the deficiencies for which a sanctions clock was
activated on September 29, 1993. This action will defer the application
of the offset sanction and defer the application of the highway
sanction. Although this action is effective upon publication, EPA will
take comment. If comments are received on EPA's proposed approval and
this interim final action, EPA will publish a final notice taking into
consideration any comments received.
DATES: This interim final determination is effective on April 20, 1995.
Comments must be received by May 22, 1995.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to: Daniel A. Meer, Rulemaking
Section (A-5-3), Air and Toxics Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105.
The state submittal and EPA's analysis for that submittal, which
are the basis for this action, are available for public review at the
above address and at the following locations:
Environmental Protection Agency, Air Docket 6102, 401 ``M'' Street,
S.W., Washington 20460.
California Air Resources Board, Stationary Source Division, Rule
Evaluation Section, 2020 ``L'' Street, Sacramento, CA 95814.
South Coast Air Quality Management District, 21865 E. Copley Drive,
Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4182.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Helen Liu, Rulemaking Section (A-5-3),
Air and Toxics Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region
IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105. Telephone: (415) 744-
1199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On May 13, 1991, the State submitted South Coast Air Quality
Management (SCAQMD) Rule 1164--Semiconductor Manufacturing, for which
EPA published a limited disapproval in the Federal Register on
September 29, 1993 [58 FR 50850]. EPA's limited disapproval action
started an 18-month clock for the application of one sanction (followed
by a second sanction 6 months later) under section 179 of the Clean Air
Act (CAA) and a 24-month clock for promulgation of a Federal
Implementation Plan (FIP) under section 110(c) of the CAA. The State
subsequently submitted a revised rule on February 24, 1995. The revised
rule was adopted by the SCAQMD on January 13, 1995. In the Proposed
Rules section of today's Federal Register, EPA has proposed full
approval of the State's submittal of SCAQMD Rule 1164--Semiconductor
Manufacturing.
Based on the proposed approval set forth in today's Federal
Register, EPA believes that it is more likely than not that the State
has corrected the original disapproval deficiencies. Therefore, EPA is
taking this final rulemaking action, effective on publication, finding
that the State has corrected the deficiency. However, EPA is also
providing the public with an opportunity to comment on this final
action. If, based on any comments on this action and any comments on
EPA's proposed approval of the State's submittal, EPA determines that
the State's submittal is not fully approvable and this final action was
inappropriate, EPA will either propose or take final action finding
that the State has not corrected the original disapproval deficiency.
As appropriate, EPA will also issue an interim final determination or a
final determination that the deficiency has not been corrected. Until
EPA takes such an action, the application of sanctions will continue to
be deferred.
This action does not stop the sanctions clock that started for this
area on September 29, 1993. However, this action will defer the
application of the offsets sanction and will defer the application of
the highway sanction. See 59 FR 39832 (Aug. 4, 1994). If EPA's proposal
fully approving the State's submittal becomes final, such action will
permanently stop the sanctions [[Page 19674]] clock and will
permanently lift any applied, stayed or deferred sanctions. If EPA
receives adverse comments and subsequently determines that the State,
in fact, did not correct the disapproval deficiency, the sanctions
consequences described in the sanctions rule will apply. See 59 FR
39832, to be codified at 40 CFR 52.31.
II. EPA Action
EPA is taking interim final action finding that the State has
corrected the disapproval deficiencies that started the sanctions
clock. Based on this action, application of the offset sanction will be
deferred and application of the highway sanction will be deferred until
EPA takes final rulemaking action fully approving the State's submittal
or until EPA takes action proposing or disapproving in whole or part
the State submittal. If EPA's proposed rulemaking action fully
approving the State submittal becomes final, at that time any sanctions
clocks will be permanently stopped and any applied, stayed or deferred
sanctions will be permanently lifted.
Because EPA has preliminarily determined that the State has
corrected the deficiencies identified in EPA's limited disapproval
action, relief from sanctions should be provided as quickly as
possible. Therefore, EPA is invoking the good cause exception under the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) in not providing an opportunity for
comment before this action takes effect.1 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). EPA
believes that notice-and-comment rulemaking before the effective date
of this action is impracticable and contrary to the public interest.
EPA has reviewed the State's submittal and, through its proposed
action, is indicating that it is more likely than not that the State
has corrected the deficiencies that started the sanctions clock.
Therefore, it is not in the public interest to initially impose
sanctions or to keep applied sanctions in place when the State has most
likely done all that it can to correct the deficiencies that triggered
the sanctions clock. Moreover, it would be impracticable to go through
notice-and-comment rulemaking on a finding that the State has corrected
the deficiencies prior to the rulemaking approving the State's
submittal. Therefore, EPA believes that it is necessary to use the
interim final rulemaking process to temporarily defer sanctions while
EPA completes its rulemaking process on the approvability of the
State's submittal. Moreover, with respect to the effective date of this
action, EPA is invoking the good cause exception to the 30-day notice
requirement of the APA because the purpose of this notice is to relieve
a restriction. See 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1).
\1\As previously noted, however, by this action EPA is providing
the public with a chance to comment on EPA's determination after the
effective date and EPA will consider any comments received in
determining whether to reverse such action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Regulatory Process
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., EPA
must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of
any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. sections 603 and
604. Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Small entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit
enterprises, and government entities with jurisdiction over populations
of less than 50,000.
This action temporarily relieves sources of an additional burden
potentially placed on them by the sanctions provisions of the CAA.
Therefore, I certify that it does not have an impact on any small
entities.
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this action
from review under Executive Order 12866.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons,
Intergovernmental regulations, Reporting and recordkeeping, Ozone,
Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
Dated: April 11, 1995.
Felicia Marcus,
Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 95-9708 Filed 4-19-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-W
