95-9713. Automated Dependent Surveillance Shipborne Equipment: Incorporation by Reference  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 76 (Thursday, April 20, 1995)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 19699-19701]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-9713]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Coast Guard
    
    33 CFR Part 164
    
    [CGD 93-022]
    RIN 2115-AE41
    
    
    Automated Dependent Surveillance Shipborne Equipment: 
    Incorporation by Reference
    
    AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to amend the incorporation by 
    reference provisions or the Automated Dependent Surveillance (ADS) 
    Shipborne Equipment. Due to the development of new Differential Global 
    Positioning System (DGPS) standards, the existing standard incorporated 
    by reference, Radio Technical Commission for Maritime Services' (RTCM) 
    Recommended Standards for Differential NAVSTAR GPS Service, Version 2.0 
    contained in 33 CFR 164.03, has been superseded by new standards 
    contained in Version 2.1. The Coast Guard proposes to replace Version 
    2.0 by incorporating the new standards contained in Version 2.1.
        Additionally, Digital Selective Calling (DSC) standards for use 
    with Vessel Traffic Services (VTS) and Maritime Mobile Services have 
    recently been developed by the International Telecommunication Union 
    Radiocommunication Bureau (ITU-R) and are also being proposed as a new 
    incorporation by reference.
        The new DGPS standards will ensure that ADS is compatible with the 
    Coast Guard national DGPS network. The standards will also provide 
    additional user safety information such as differential station health 
    indicators.
        The new DSC standards will ensure that the Automated Dependent 
    Surveillance Shipborne Equipment (ADSSE), built by various 
    manufacturers, will provide the same message in an internationally 
    accepted format.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 19, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to the Executive Secretary, Marine 
    Safety Council (G-LRA/3406) (CGD 93-022), U.S. Coast Guard 
    Headquarters, 2100 Second Street SW., Washington, DC 20593-0001, or may 
    be delivered to Room 3406 at the same address between 8 a.m. and 3 
    p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone 
    number is (202) 267-1477.
        The Executive Secretary maintains the public docket for this 
    rulemaking. Comments will become part of this docket and will be 
    available for inspection or copying at room 3406, U.S. Coast Guard 
    Headquarters, between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 
    Federal holidays.
        A copy of the material proposed for ``Incorporation by Reference'' 
    is available for inspection at Room 1409, U.S. Coast Guard 
    Headquarters. It may also be obtained from the sources listed in the 
    proposed rule.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irene Hoffman, Project Manager, Vessel 
    Traffic Services Division. The telephone number is 202-267-6277.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Request for Comments
    
        The Coast Guard encourages interested persons to participate in 
    this rulemaking by submitting written data, views, or arguments. 
    Persons submitting comments should include their names and addresses, 
    identify this rulemaking (CGD 93-022) and the specific section of this 
    proposal to which each comment applies, and give the reason for each 
    comment. Please submit two copies of all comments and attachments in an 
    unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for 
    copying and electronic filing. Persons wanting acknowledgment of 
    receipt of comments should enclose stamped, self-addressed postcards or 
    envelopes.
        The Coast Guard will consider all comments received during the 
    comment period. It may change this proposal in view of the comments.
        The Coast Guard plans no public hearing. Persons may request a 
    public hearing by writing to the Marine Safety Council at the address 
    under ADDRESSES. The request should include reasons why a hearing would 
    be beneficial. If it determines that the opportunity for oral 
    presentations will aid this rulemaking, the Coast Guard will hold a 
    public hearing at a time and place announced by a later notice in the 
    Federal Register.
    
    Drafting Information
    
        The principal persons involved in drafting this document are Irene 
    Hoffman, Project Manager, Vessel Traffic Services Division and Nicholas 
    Grasselli, Project Counsel, Office of Chief Counsel.
    
    Background and Purpose
    
        Section 5004 of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, as codified in 33 
    U.S.C. 2374, directed the Coast Guard to acquire, install, and operate 
    additional equipment, as necessary, to provide surveillance of tank 
    vessels carrying oil [[Page 19700]] from the Trans-Alaskan Pipeline 
    through Prince William Sound.
        While endeavoring to meet the requirements of the Act, the Coast 
    Guard investigated various types of surveillance systems, including 
    radar and dependent surveillance systems. The Coast Guard determined an 
    ADS system that uses DGPS would meet the Coast Guard's requirements 
    without being cost prohibitive to the Government and the user. The 
    shipboard portion of the system, ADSSE, includes a 12 channel all-in-
    view DGPS receiver, a marine radiobeacon band receiver capable of 
    receiving DGPS error correction messages, a VHF/FM transceiver using 
    DSC, and a control unit.
        On July 17, 1992, the Coast Guard published a final rule, Prince 
    William Sound Automated Dependent Surveillance System, in the Federal 
    Register (57 FR 31660). This final rule amended the Prince William 
    Sound VTS regulations by incorporating the use of ADS using DGPS. The 
    regulation requires tank vessels of 20,000 DWT or more, transiting 
    Prince William Sound, to carry operating ADSSE.
        Since the publication of this regulation, the Coast Guard has 
    determined that the use of ADS may expand beyond Prince William Sound. 
    In order to facilitate future expansion into other areas of the U.S., 
    the final rule amending the National VTS Regulations (59 FR 36316), 
    divided the Prince William Sound Automated Dependent Surveillance 
    System rule into two sections: (a) A navigation equipment rule 
    (Sec. 164.43); and (b) a vessel operating rule for Prince William Sound 
    (Sec. 165.1704). VTS Reporting Exemptions for vessels equipped with an 
    operating ADSSE are set forth in Sec. 161.23(c). The ``Incorporation by 
    Reference'' section (Sec. 161.109) associated with this rule has been 
    redesignated as Sec. 164.03(b)(2).
    
    Discussion of Proposed Rules
    
        Due to the development of new DGPS standards, the existing standard 
    incorporated by reference, RTCM Recommended Standards for Differential 
    NAVSTAR GPS Service, Version 2.0 RTCM Paper 134-89/SC 104-68 
    incorporated in 33 CFR 164.03, has been superseded. Differential 
    NAVSTAR GPS Service, Version 2.0 will be replaced with the new 
    standards, RTCM Recommended Standards for Differential NAVSTAR GPS 
    Service, Version 2.1 RTCM Paper 194-93/SC 104-STD, which have been 
    developed with industry input and approved by RTCM.
        Additionally, DSC standards for use with VTS and Maritime Mobile 
    Service, Optional Expansion of the DSC System for use in the Maritime 
    Mobile Service, ITU-R Recommendation 821 and Characteristics of a 
    Transponder System using DSC Techniques for use with VTS and Ship-to-
    Ship Identification, ITU-R Recommendation 825, have been developed by 
    the ITU-R with industry input and will also be incorporated by 
    reference.
    
    Incorporation by Reference
    
        The proposed material would be incorporated by reference in 
    Sec. 164.03. Copies of the material are available for inspection where 
    indicated under ADDRESSES. Copies of the material are also available 
    from the sources listed in Sec. 164.03.
        Before publishing a final rule, the Coast Guard will submit this 
    material to the Director of the Federal Register for approval of the 
    incorporation by reference.
    
    Regulatory Evaluation
    
        This proposal is not a significant regulatory action under section 
    3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an assessment of 
    potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that order. It 
    has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget under that 
    order. It is not significant under the regulatory policies and 
    procedures of the Department of Transportation (DOT) (44 FR 11040; 
    February 26, 1979).
        The Coast Guard expects the economic impact of this proposal to be 
    so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under paragraph 10e of the 
    regulatory policies and procedures of DOT is unnecessary. The upgrade 
    of DGPS receivers from Version 2.0 RTCM Paper 134-89/SC 104-68, to 
    Version 2.1 RTCM Paper 194-93/SC 104-STD requires only a firmware 
    upgrade. At least one manufacturer has indicated that this upgrade is 
    available at no cost to the user. Additionally, recent indications are 
    that the cost to initially outfit tank vessels with DGPS equipment may 
    be less than the original estimate of $50,000 per vessel. A more 
    reasonable estimate now would be approximately $15,000 per vessel. The 
    cost is expected to drop further as dependent surveillance is 
    implemented in other U.S. ports and worldwide.
    
    Small Entities
    
        Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the 
    Coast Guard must consider whether this proposal, if adopted, will have 
    a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
    entities. ``Small entities'' may include: (1) Small businesses and not-
    for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and 
    are not dominant in their fields; and (2) governmental jurisdictions 
    with populations of less than 50,000. This regulation will only affect 
    owners and operators of tank vessels of 20,000 or more DWT operating in 
    Prince William Sound and carrying oil from the Trans-Alaska Pipeline. 
    The construction and operating costs of vessels of this size is such 
    that their owners tend to be major corporations or subsidiaries of 
    major corporations. Business entities with the capital and operating 
    costs of this magnitude do not meet the definition of ``small 
    entities.''
        Because it expects the impact of this proposal to be minimal, the 
    Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposal, if 
    adopted, will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
    number of small entities.
    
    Collection of Information
    
        This proposal contains no collection of information requirements 
    under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
    
    Federalism
    
        The Coast Guard has analyzed this proposal under the principles and 
    criteria contained in Executive Order 12612 and has determined that 
    this proposal does not have sufficient federalism implications to 
    warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
    
    Environment
    
        The Coast Guard considered the environmental impact of this 
    proposal and concluded that under section 2.B.2 of Commandant 
    Instruction M16475.1B, this proposal is categorically excluded from 
    further environmental documentation.
        This rulemaking is intended to improve accuracy and reliability of 
    vessel tracking equipment. It may benefit the environment by reducing 
    the potential for catastrophic oil spills which may result from tank 
    vessels involved in groundings, rammings, or collisions. While this 
    rulemaking may have a positive effect on the environment by minimizing 
    the risk of environmental harm resulting from collisions and 
    groundings, the impact is not expected to be significant enough to 
    warrant further documentation. A ``Categorical Exclusion 
    Determination'' is available in the docket for inspection or copying 
    where indicated under ADDRESSES. [[Page 19701]] 
    
    List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 164
    
        Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements, Waterways, Incorporation by reference.
    
        For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes 
    to amend 33 CFR part 164 as follows:
    
    PART 164--NAVIGATION SAFETY REGULATIONS
    
        1. The authority citation for part 164 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. 2103, 3703; 49 CFR 1.46. 
    Sec. 164.13 also issued under 46 U.S.C. 8502 sec. 4114(a), Pub.L. 
    101-380, 104 Stat. 517 (46 U.S.C. 3703 note). Sec. 164.61 also 
    issued under 46 U.S.C. 6101.
    
        2. Section 164.03 paragraph (b) is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 164.03  Incorporation by Reference
    
    * * * * *
        (b) The materials approved for incorporation by reference in this 
    part and the sections affected are:
    
    International Maritime Organization (IMO)                               
      4 Embankment, London, SE1 7SR, U.K                                    
      Recommendation on Performance Standards for Automatic Pilots,         
       Resolution A.342(IX), adopted November 12, 1975.............   164.13
    Radio Technical Commission For Maritime Services (RTCM)                 
      655 Fifteenth St., N.W., Suite 300, Washington, D.C. 20005            
      Minimum Performance Standards (MPS) Marine Loran C Receiving          
       Equipment, RTCM Paper 12-78/DO-100, 1977....................   164.41
      RTCM Recommended Standards for Differential NAVSTAR GPS               
       Service, Version 2.1, RTCM Paper 194-93/SC 104-STD, 1994....   164.43
    International Telecommunication Union Radiocommunication Bureau         
     (ITU-R)                                                                
      Place de Nations CH-1211 Geneva 20 Switzerland                        
      Optional Expansion of the Digital Selective-Calling System            
       for use in the Maritime Mobile Service, ITU-R Recommendation         
       821, 1992...................................................   164.43
      Characteristics of a Transponder System using Digital                 
       Selective-Calling Techniques for use with Vessel Traffic             
       Services and Ship-to-Ship Identification, ITU-R                      
       Recommendation 825, 1992....................................   164.43
                                                                            
    
        Dated: March 30, 1995.
    G.A. Penington,
    Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Chief, Office of Navigation Safety and 
    Waterway Services.
    [FR Doc. 95-9713 Filed 4-19-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-14-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/20/1995
Department:
Coast Guard
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Document Number:
95-9713
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before June 19, 1995.
Pages:
19699-19701 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
CGD 93-022
RINs:
2115-AE41
PDF File:
95-9713.pdf
CFR: (2)
33 CFR 164.03
33 CFR 164.13