[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 20, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 21160]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-8883]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. AA-1921-188 (Review)]
Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand From Japan
AGENCY: International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Scheduling of an expedited five-year review concerning the
antidumping finding on prestressed concrete steel wire strand from
Japan.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of an
expedited review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation
of the antidumping finding on prestressed concrete steel wire strand
from Japan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. For further
information concerning the conduct of this review and rules of general
application, consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure,
part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 6, 2004.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jai Motwane (202-205-3176), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information
on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server
(http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this review may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background.--On April 6, 2004, the
Commission determined that the domestic interested party group response
to its notice of institution (69 FR 101, January 2, 2004) of the
subject five-year review was adequate and that the respondent
interested party group response was inadequate. The Commission did not
find any other circumstances that would warrant conducting a full
review.\1\ Accordingly, the Commission determined that it would conduct
an expedited review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's
statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements
will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission's web site.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Staff report.--A staff report containing information concerning the
subject matter of the review will be placed in the nonpublic record on
May 10, 2004, and made available to persons on the Administrative
Protective Order service list for this review. A public version will be
issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the Commission's
rules.
Written submissions.--As provided in section 207.62(d) of the
Commission's rules, interested parties that are parties to the review
and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of
institution,\2\ and any party other than an interested party to the
review may file written comments with the Secretary on what
determination the Commission should reach in the review. Comments are
due on or before May 13, 2004, and may not contain new factual
information. Any person that is neither a party to the five-year review
nor an interested party may submit a brief written statement (which
shall not contain any new factual information) pertinent to the review
by May 13, 2004. However, should the Department of Commerce extend the
time limit for its completion of the final results of its review, the
deadline for comments (which may not contain new factual information)
on Commerce's final results is three business days after the issuance
of Commerce's results. If comments contain business proprietary
information (BPI), they must conform with the requirements of sections
201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission's rules. The Commission's
rules do not authorize filing of submissions with the Secretary by
facsimile or electronic means, except to the extent permitted by
section 201.8 of the Commission's rules, as amended, 67 FR 68036
(November 8, 2002).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The Commission has found the responses submitted on behalf
of American Spring Wire Corp., Insteel Wire Products Co., and
Sumiden Wire Corp. to be individually adequate. Comments from other
interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each
document filed by a party to the review must be served on all other
parties to the review (as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The
Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate
of service.
Determination.--The Commission has determined to exercise its
authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days pursuant to 19
U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B).
Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.
Issued: April 14, 2004.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 04-8883 Filed 4-19-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
