[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 77 (Friday, April 21, 1995)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 19871-19872]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-9807]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
28 CFR Part 16
[AAG/A Order No. 102-95]
Exemption of Records System Under the Privacy Act
AGENCY: Department of Justice.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons (BOP), proposes
to exempt a Privacy Act system of records from subsections (c)(3) and
(4), (d), (e)(2) and (3), (e)(5) and (8), (f) and (g) of the Privacy
Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) and (k)(2). This system of records is the BOP
``Telephone Activity Record System (JUSTICE/BOP-011).'' Information in
this system relates to inmate telephone activity and may include
information relating to official Federal investigations and matters of
law enforcement of the BOP pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2510 et seq., 3621,
4003, 4042 and 4082. The exemptions are necessary to protect third
party privacy and to avoid interference with law enforcement
activities, e.g., to preclude the disclosure of investigative
techniques, to prevent subjects of investigations from frustrating the
investigative process, and to more effectively ensure the safety,
security and good order of Federal correctional facilities.
DATES: Submit any comments by May 22, 1995.
[[Page 19872]] ADDRESSES: Address all comments to Patricia E. Neely,
Staff Assistant, Systems Policy Staff, Justice Management Division,
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530 (Room 850, WCTR Building).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia E. Neely (202-616-0178).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the notice section of today's Federal
Register, the Department of Justice provides a description of the
``Telephone Activity Record System'', JUSTICE/BOP-011.''
Pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601-612, it is hereby stated that the order will not have a
``significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.''
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 16
Administrative practices and procedure, Freedom of Information Act,
Government in the Sunshine Act and Privacy Act.
Pursuant to the authority vested in the Attorney General by 5
U.S.C. 552a and delegated to me by the Attorney General Order No. 793-
78, it is proposed to amend 28 CFR part 16 as set forth below.
Dated: April 6, 1995.
Stephen R. Colgate,
Assistant Attorney General for Administration.
1. The authority for part 16 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552, 552a, 552b(g) and 553; 18 U.S.C.
4203(a)(1); 28 U.S.C. 509, 510, 534; 31 U.S.C. 3717 and 9701.
2. It is proposed to amend 28 CFR 16.97 by adding and reserving
paragraph (d) and adding paragraphs (e) and (f), to read as follows:
Sec. 16.97 Exemption of Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) Systems--
limited access.
* * * * *
(d) [Reserved]
(e) The following system of records is exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a
(c)(3) and (4), (d), (e)(2) and (3), (e)(5) and (8), (f) and (g):
Telephone Activity Record System (JUSTICE/BOP-011).
(f) These exemptions apply only to the extent that information in
this system is subject to exemption pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2)
and/or (k)(2). Where compliance would not appear to interfere with or
adversely affect the law enforcement process, and/or where it may be
appropriate to permit individuals to contest the accuracy of the
information collected, the applicable exemption may be waived, either
partially or totally, by the BOP. Exemptions from the particular
subsections are justified for the following reasons:
(1) From subsection (c)(3) to the extent that this system of
records is exempt from subsection (d), and for such reasons as those
cited for subsection (d) in paragraph (f)(3) below.
(2) From subsection (c)(4) to the extent that exemption from
subsection (d) makes this exemption inapplicable.
(3) From the access provisions of subsection (d) because exemption
from this subsection is essential to prevent access of information by
record subjects that may invade third party privacy; frustrate the
investigative process; jeopardize the legitimate correctional interests
of safety, security, and good order of prison facilities; or otherwise
compromise, impede, or interfere with BOP or other law enforcement
agency activities.
(4) From the amendment provisions from subsection (d) because
amendment of the records may interfere with law enforcement operations
and would impose an impossible administrative burden by requiring that,
in addition to efforts to ensure accuracy so as to withstand possible
judicial scrutiny, it would require that law enforcement information be
continuously reexamined, even where the information may have been
collected from the record subject. Also, some of these records come
from other Federal criminal justice agencies or State, local and
foreign jurisdictions, or from Federal and State probation and judicial
offices, and it is administratively impossible to ensure that the
records comply with this provision.
(5) From subsection (e)(2) because the nature of criminal and other
investigative activities is such that vital information about an
individual can be obtained from other persons who are familiar with
such individual and his/her activities. In such investigations it is
not feasible to rely solely upon information furnished by the
individual concerning his/her own activities since it may result in
inaccurate information.
(6) From subsection (e)(3) because in view of BOP's operational
responsibilities, application of this provision to the collection of
information is inappropriate. Application of this provision could
provide the subject with substantial information which may in fact
impede the information gathering process or compromise an
investigation.
(7) From subsection (e)(5) because in the collection and
maintenance of information for law enforcement purposes, it is
impossible to determine in advance what information is accurate,
relevant, timely and complete. Material which may seem unrelated,
irrelevant or incomplete when collected may take on added meaning or
significance at a later date or as an investigation progresses. Also,
some of these records may come from other Federal, State, local and
foreign law enforcement agencies, and from Federal and State probation
and judicial offices and it is administratively impossible to ensure
that the records comply with this provision. It would also require that
law enforcement information be continuously reexamined even where the
information may have been collected from the record subject.
(8) From subsection (e)(8) because the nature of BOP law
enforcement activities renders impractical the notice of compliance
with compulsory legal process. This requirement could present a serious
impediment to law enforcement such as revealing investigative
techniques or the existence of confidential investigations, jeopardize
the security of third parties, or otherwise compromise law enforcement
efforts.
(11) From subsections (f) and (g) to the extent that this system is
exempt from the access and amendment provisions of subsection (d).
[FR Doc. 95-9807 Filed 4-20-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-05-M
