95-9856. Williams Gas ProcessingMid-Continent Region Company; Petition for Declaratory Order  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 77 (Friday, April 21, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 19913-19914]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-9856]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
    [Docket No. CP95-318-000]
    
    
    Williams Gas Processing--Mid-Continent Region Company; Petition 
    for Declaratory Order
    
    April 17, 1995.
        Take notice that on April 11, 1995, Williams Gas Processing--Mid- 
    [[Page 19914]] Continent Region Company (WGP-MCR), Post Office Box 
    3102, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74101, filed a petition for a declaratory order 
    in Docket No. CP95-318-000, requesting that the Commission declare that 
    WGP-MCR's acquisition, ownership, and operation of approximately 25.8 
    miles of 26-inch pipeline and appurtenant facilities located in Texas 
    County, Oklahoma currently owned by Williams Natural Gas Company (WNG) 
    are exempt from the Commission's Regulations pursuant to Section 1(b) 
    of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), all as more fully set forth in the 
    petition which is on file with the Commission and open to public 
    inspection.
        WGP-MCR states that the current filing is necessary because the 
    subject line's function will change as a result of the construction and 
    operation of a new processing plant, the Baker Plant. The new plant is 
    being constructed by Williams Field Services Company (WFS), an 
    affiliate of WGP-MCR, and will process gas from both the Straight sub-
    system and the Liberal-Baker subsystem as well as third-party gathering 
    systems. WGP-MCR states that the Baker Plant will replace the Guymon 
    drip control plant and is scheduled to be in operation by November 1, 
    1995. WGP-MCR states that the subject 25.8 mile pipeline is located 
    upstream of the new Baker Plant, and upon completion of the plant the 
    function of the subject line will be gathering.
        WGP-MCR asks that the Commission process this petition for 
    declaratory order and WNG's related abandonment application, but it 
    does not request an order until the Baker Plant begins operations. WGP-
    MCR states that it will use the same default contract for services on 
    the subject facilities as was submitted to the Commission in Docket No. 
    CP94-196-000.
        WGP-MCR asserts that the Baker Plant will be capable of processing 
    greater volumes and of removing more liquids compared to the 
    capabilities of the Guymon drip control plant, and this will result in 
    better value to the gathering and processing customers. WGP-MCR claims 
    that the location of the plant was chosen for primarily two reasons: 
    (1) Located in the middle of the production facilities owned by third 
    parties--whereas the Guymon drip control plant could only process gas 
    from the Straight facilities; and (2) the location of the Baker Plant 
    is conducive to the formation of a hub, with other transmission 
    pipelines located in the vicinity.
        WGP-MCR states that it will provide gathering services consistent 
    with open-access principles and will operate as a company separate and 
    independent from WNG. WNG currently provides transportation service to 
    one direct delivery irrigation customer connected to the subject 
    pipeline. WGP-MCR asserts that it will assume WNG's obligations and 
    provide gathering services to this customer following abandonment.
        Any person desiring to be heard or to make a protest with reference 
    to said petition should, on or before May 8, 1995, file with the 
    Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., 
    Washington, DC 20426 a motion to intervene or a protest in accordance 
    with the requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
    Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211). All protests filed with the 
    Commission will be considered by it in determining the appropriate 
    action to be taken, but will not serve to make the protestants parties 
    to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party to a proceeding 
    or to participate as a party in any hearing therein must file a motion 
    to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules.
    Lois D. Cashell,
    Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 95-9856 Filed 4-20-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/21/1995
Department:
Energy Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
95-9856
Pages:
19913-19914 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. CP95-318-000
PDF File:
95-9856.pdf