98-10540. CDR Ridgway, Ridgway, Pennsylvania; Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 19754-19755]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-10540]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
    
    Employment and Training Administration
    [TA-W-33,289]
    
    
    CDR Ridgway, Ridgway, Pennsylvania; Notice of Revised 
    Determination on Reconsideration
    
        The Department, on its own motion, has reconsidered its negative 
    determination in United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC, and 
    United Steelworkers of America, Local 13694 v. Alexis Herman, No. 97-
    09-01601, U.S. Court of International Trade. As a result of this 
    reconsideration, the Department is now certifying the workers of CDR 
    Ridgway in Ridgway, Pennsylvania as eligible to apply for trade 
    adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act.
        The April 28, 1997, denial of TAA for workers of the subject firm 
    was based on the finding that criterion (2) of the group eligibility 
    requirements of Section 222 of the Trade Act was not met. Company-wide 
    sales of pigments increased in 1996 compared to 1995. Layoffs were 
    attributable to the parent company's decision to transfer the Ridgway 
    pigment production to three other domestic locations.
        New investigation findings show that although corporate-wide sales 
    of pigments increased from 1995 to 1996, sales, production and 
    employment at the Ridgway plant declined to zero when the plant closed 
    in the first quarter of 1997. Accordingly, criteria (1) and (2) of 
    Section 222 of the Trade Act are met.
        On reconsideration, the Department conducted a survey of Ridgway's 
    major declining customers. Survey results show that in 1996 compared to 
    1995, customers increased reliance on imports of pigments while 
    decreasing purchases from CDR Ridgway, Ridgway, Pennsylvania.
    
    Conclusion
    
        After careful review of the additional facts obtained on remand, it 
    is concluded that increased imports of articles like or directly 
    competitive with pigments produced at CDR Ridgway, Ridgway, 
    Pennsylvania contributed importantly to the decline in sales or 
    production and to the total or partial separation of workers at subject 
    firm. In accordance with the provisions of the Trade Act of 1974, I 
    make the following revised determination:
    
        ``All workers of CDR Ridgway, Ridgway, Pennsylvania, who became 
    totally or partially separated from employment on or after February 
    19, 1996 through two years
    
    [[Page 19755]]
    
    from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment 
    assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.''
    
        Signed in Washington, D.C. this 30th day of March, 1998.
    Grant D. Beale,
    Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
    [FR Doc. 98-10540 Filed 4-20-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
04/21/1998
Department:
Employment and Training Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-10540
Pages:
19754-19755 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
TA-W-33,289
PDF File:
98-10540.pdf