97-10254. Small Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Offshore Seismic Activities in the Beaufort Sea  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 77 (Tuesday, April 22, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 19553-19557]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-10254]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    
    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
    [I.D. 040497A]
    
    
    Small Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; 
    Offshore Seismic Activities in the Beaufort Sea
    
    AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
    Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
    
    ACTION: Notice of receipt of application and proposed authorization for 
    a small take exemption; request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: NMFS has received a request from the BP Exploration (Alaska) 
    900 East Benson Boulevard, Anchorage, AK 99519 (BPXA) for a renewal of 
    an authorization to take small numbers of marine mammals by harassment 
    incidental to conducting seismic surveys in and near the Northstar 
    Unit, in the Beaufort Sea in state and Federal waters. Under the Marine 
    Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), NMFS is requesting comments on its 
    proposal to authorize BPXA to incidentally take, by harassment, small 
    numbers of bowhead whales and other marine mammals in the above 
    mentioned areas during the open water period of 1997.
    
    DATES: Comments and information must be received no later than May 22, 
    1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments on the application should be addressed to Michael 
    Payne, Chief, Marine Mammal Division, Office of Protected Resources, 
    NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910-3225. A copy of 
    the application, an environmental assessment (EA), an informal section 
    7 consultation, the 90-day Report, and a list of references used in 
    this document may be obtained by writing to this address or by 
    telephoning one of the contacts listed below.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenneth R. Hollingshead, Office of 
    Protected Resources, NMFS, (301) 713-2055, Brad Smith, Western Alaska 
    Field Office, NMFS, (907) 271-5006.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        Section 101(a)(5) (A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) 
    directs the Secretary of Commerce to allow, upon request, the 
    incidental, but not intentional taking of marine mammals by U.S. 
    citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than commercial 
    fishing) within a specified geographical region if certain findings are 
    made and either regulations are issued or, if the taking is limited to 
    harassment, notice of a proposed authorization is provided to the 
    public for review.
        Permission may be granted if NMFS finds that the taking will have a 
    negligible impact on the species or stock(s), will not have an 
    unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of the species or 
    stock(s) for subsistence uses, and the permissible methods of taking 
    and requirements pertaining to the monitoring and reporting of such 
    taking are set forth.
        On April 10, 1996 (61 FR 15884), NMFS published an interim rule 
    establishing, among other things, procedures for issuing incidental 
    harassment authorizations under section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA for 
    activities in Arctic waters. For additional information on the 
    procedures to be followed for this authorization, please refer to that 
    document.
    
    Summary of Request
    
        On March 5, 1997, NMFS received an application from BPXA requesting 
    a 1-year renewal of their authorization for
    
    [[Page 19554]]
    
    the harassment of small numbers of several species of marine mammals 
    incidental to conducting seismic surveys during the open water season 
    within and near the Northstar Unit, in the Beaufort Sea between 
    145 deg. 30'W and 150 deg. 30'W, in U.S. waters. Weather permitting, 
    the survey is expected to take place between approximately July 1 and 
    October 20, 1997. A detailed description of the work planned is 
    contained in the application (BPXA 1997) and is available upon request 
    (see ADDRESSES). Description of Habitat and Marine Mammal Affected by 
    the Activity
        A detailed description of the Beaufort Sea ecosystem and its 
    associated marine mammals can be found in the EA prepared for this 
    authorization (BPXA 1996b) or in other documents (Minerals Management 
    Service (MMS) 1992, 1996) and need not be repeated here. A copy of the 
    EA is available upon request (see ADDRESSES).
    
    Marine Mammals
    
        The Beaufort/Chukchi Seas support a diverse assemblage of marine 
    mammals including bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus), gray whales 
    (Eschrichtius robustus), belukha (Delphinapterus leucas), ringed seals 
    (Phoca hispida), spotted seals (Phoca largha) and bearded seals 
    (Erignathus barbatus). Descriptions of the biology and distribution of 
    these species, and others, can be found in several other documents 
    (BPXA 1996b, 1997, Lentfer 1988, MMS 1992, NMFS 1990 and 1996, Small 
    and DeMaster 1995). Please refer to those documents for information on 
    these species. Potential Effects of Seismic Surveys on Marine Mammals.
        Disturbance by seismic noise is the principal means of taking by 
    this activity. Vessels and aircraft will provide a secondary source of 
    noise.
        Deep seismic surveys are used to obtain data about formations 
    several thousands of feet deep. The physical presence of vessels and 
    aircraft could also lead to non-acoustic effects involving visual or 
    other cues. The proposed seismic operation is an ocean bottom cable 
    (OBC) survey. OBC surveys involve dropping a cable from a ship to the 
    ocean bottom. Sensors (hydrophones) are attached to the cable. These 
    hydrophones are used to detect seismic energy reflected back from 
    underground rock strata. The original source of this energy is a 
    submerged acoustic source, called a seismic airgun array, that releases 
    compressed air into the water, creating an acoustical energy pulse that 
    is directed downwards toward the seabed. After sufficient energy has 
    been recorded to allow accurate mapping of the rock strata, the cable 
    is lifted onto the deck of a cable-retrieval vessel, moved to a new 
    location (ranging from several hundred to a few thousand feet away), 
    and placed onto the seabed again. For a more detailed description of 
    the seismic operation, including numbers of vessels planned for this 
    survey, please refer to the application (BPXA 1997).
        Depending upon ambient conditions and the sensitivity of the 
    receptor, underwater sounds produced by open water seismic operations 
    may be detectable some substantial distance away from the activity. Any 
    sound that is detectable is (at least in theory) capable of eliciting a 
    disturbance reaction by a marine mammal or masking a signal of 
    comparable frequency (BPXA 1997). An incidental harassment take is 
    presumed to occur when marine mammals in the vicinity of the seismic 
    source, the seismic vessel, other vessels, or aircraft react to the 
    generated sounds or visual cues.
        Seismic pulses are known to cause bowhead whales to behaviorally 
    respond within a distance of several kilometers (km) (Richardson et al. 
    1995). Although some limited masking of low-frequency sounds (e.g., 
    whale calls) is a possibility, the intermittent nature of seismic 
    source pulses (1 sec every 6-12 sec) will limit the extent of masking. 
    Bowhead whales are known to continue calling in the presence of seismic 
    survey sounds, and their calls can be heard between seismic pulses 
    (Richardson et al. 1986). Masking effects are expected to be absent in 
    the case of belukhas, given that sounds important to them are 
    predominantly at much higher frequencies than are airgun sounds (BPXA 
    1997).
        Hearing damage is not expected to occur during the project. It is 
    not known whether a marine mammal very close to an airgun array would 
    be at risk of temporary or permanent hearing impairment, but temporary 
    threshold shift is a theoretical possibility for animals within a few 
    hundred meters (Richardson et al. 1995) of the source. However, planned 
    monitoring and mitigation measures (described below) are designed to 
    detect marine mammals occurring near the array and to avoid exposing 
    them to sound pulses that have any possibility of causing hearing 
    damage.
        When the received levels of noise exceed some behavioral reaction 
    threshold, cetaceans will show disturbance reactions (BPXA 1997). The 
    levels, frequencies, and types of noise that will elicit a response 
    vary between and within species, individuals, locations and season. 
    Behavioral changes may be subtle alterations in surface-respiration-
    dive cycles. More conspicuous responses include changes in activity or 
    aerial displays, movement away from the sound source, or complete 
    avoidance of the area. The reaction threshold and degree of response 
    are related to the activity of the animal at the time of the 
    disturbance. Whales engaged in active behaviors such as feeding, 
    socializing or mating are less likely than resting animals to show 
    overt behavioral reactions, unless the disturbance is directly 
    threatening (BPXA 1997).
    
    Bowhead Whales
    
        Various studies (Reeves et al. 1984, Fraker et al. 1985, Richardson 
    et al. 1986, Ljungblad et al. 1988) have reported that, when an 
    operating seismic vessel approaches within a few kilometers, most 
    bowhead whales exhibit strong avoidance behavior and changes in 
    surfacing, respiration, and dive cycles. Bowheads exposed to seismic 
    pulses from vessels more than 4.5 miles (mi) (7.5 km) away rarely 
    showed observable avoidance of the vessel, but their surface, 
    respiration, and dive cycles appeared altered in a manner similar to 
    that observed in whales exposed at a closer distance (BPXA 1996).
        Within a 3.7-60 mi (6-99 km) range, it has not been possible to 
    determine a specific distance at which subtle behavioral changes no 
    longer occur (Richardson and Malme 1993), given the high variability 
    observed in bowhead whale behavior (BPX 1996).
        Preliminary analysis of the results from BPXA's 1996 seismic 
    monitoring program does not provide conclusive evidence about the 
    radius of avoidance of bowheads to the seismic program. The peak number 
    of bowhead sightings was 10-20 km (6.2-12.3 mi) from shore during no-
    seismic periods and 20-30 km (12.3-18.6 mi) from shore during periods 
    that may have been influenced by seismic noise. This difference was not 
    statistically significant, but the low numbers of sightings precluded 
    meaningful interpretation (BPXA 1997).
    
    Gray Whales
    
        The reactions of gray whales to seismic pulses is similar to those 
    of bowheads. Migrating gray whales along the California coast were 
    noted to slow their speed of swimming, turn away from seismic noise 
    sources, and increase their respiration rates. Malme et al. (1983, 
    1984, 1988) concluded that about 50 percent showed avoidance when the 
    average received pulse level was 170 dB (re 1 Pa @ 1 m). Less 
    consistent results were indicated at levels of 140-160 dB.
    
    [[Page 19555]]
    
    Belukha
    
        The belukha is the only species of toothed whale (Odontoceti) 
    expected to be encountered in the Beaufort Sea. Because its hearing 
    threshold at frequencies below 100 Hz (where most of the energy from 
    airgun arrays is concentrated) is poor (125 dB re 1 Pa @ 1 m) 
    or more depending upon frequency (Johnson et al. 1989, Richardson 1991, 
    1995), belukha are not predicted to be strongly influenced by seismic 
    noise. However, because of the high source levels of seismic pulses, 
    airgun sounds may be audible to belukha at large distances (Richardson 
    1991, 1995).
    
    Ringed, Largha and Bearded Seals
    
        No detailed studies of reactions by seals to noise from open water 
    seismic exploration have been published (Richardson et al. 1995). 
    However, there are some data on the reactions of seals to various types 
    of impulsive sounds (J. Parsons as quoted in Greene et al. 1985, Anon. 
    1975, Mate and Harvey 1985). These studies indicate that ice seals 
    typically either tolerate or habituate to seismic noise produced from 
    open water sources.
        Underwater audiograms have been obtained using behavioral methods 
    for three species of phocinid seals, ringed, harbor, and harp seals 
    (Pagophilus groenlandicus). These audiograms were reviewed in 
    Richardson et al. (1995). Below 30-50 kHz, the hearing threshold of 
    phocinids is essentially flat down to at least 1 kHz, and ranges 
    between 60 and 85 dB (re 1 Pa @ 1 m). There are few data on 
    hearing sensitivity of phocinid seals below 1 kHz. NMFS considers 
    harbor seals to have a hearing threshold of 70-85 dB at 1 kHz (60 FR 
    53753, October 17, 1995), and recent measurements for a harbor seal 
    indicate that, below 1 kHz, its thresholds deteriorate gradually to 97 
    dB (re 1 Pa @ 1 m) at 100 Hz (Kastak and Schusterman, 1995a, 
    b).
        Because no studies to date have focused on pinniped reaction to 
    underwater noise from pulsed, seismic arrays in open water (Richardson 
    et al. 1991, 1995), as opposed to in-air exposure to continuous noise, 
    substantive conclusions are not possible at this time. However, 
    assuming a sound pressure level needed to be 80-100 dB over its 
    threshold in order to cause annoyance and 130 dB for injury (pain), as 
    is the current thought based upon human studies (ARPA and NMFS 1995), 
    then it appears unlikely that pinnipeds would be harassed or injured by 
    low frequency sounds from a seismic source unless they were within 
    close proximity of the array. For permanent injury, marine mammals 
    would need to remain in the high noise field for extended periods of 
    time. Existing evidence also suggests that, while they may be capable 
    of hearing sounds from seismic arrays, seals appear to tolerate intense 
    pulsatile sounds, without known effect, once they learn that there is 
    no danger associated with the noise (see, for example, NMFS/WDFW 1995). 
    In addition, they will apparently not abandon feeding or breeding areas 
    due to exposure to these noise sources (Richardson et al. 1991) and may 
    habituate to certain noises over time. Since seismic work is fairly 
    common in Western Beaufort Sea waters, pinnipeds have previously been 
    exposed to seismic noise, and may not react to it, after initial 
    exposure.
    
    Numbers of Marine Mammals Expected To Be Taken
    
        Based upon calculations provided in their application, BPXA 
    estimates that the following numbers of marine mammals may be subject 
    to Level B harassment, as defined in 50 CFR 216.3:
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                 Harassment takes in 1997           
                   Species                      Population size     ------------------------------------------------
                                                                             Possible                Probable       
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Bowhead..............................  8,000...................  400                      200                   
    Gray whale...........................  23,000..................  <10 0="" belukha..............................="" 41,610..................="" 250="" 150="" ringed="" seal..........................="" 1-1.5="" million...........="" 400=""><400 spotted="" seal.........................="">200,000................  10                       5                     
    Bearded seal.........................  >300,000................  50                       30                    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Effects of Seismic Noise and Other Activities on Subsistence Needs
    
        The disturbance and potential displacement of marine mammals by 
    sounds from seismic activities is the principle concern related to 
    subsistence use of the area. The harvest of marine mammals (mainly 
    bowhead whales, ringed seals, and bearded seals) is central to the 
    culture and subsistence economies of the coastal North Slope 
    communities (BPXA 1997). In particular, if migrating bowhead whales are 
    displaced farther offshore by elevated noise levels, this could make 
    harvest of these whales more difficult and dangerous for hunters. The 
    harvest could also be affected if bowheads are more skittish when 
    exposed to seismic noise (BPXA 1997).
        Nuiqsut is the community closest to the area of the proposed 
    activity, and only harvests bowhead whales during the fall whaling 
    season. Nuiqsut whalers typically take zero to three whales each season 
    (four in 1995; two in 1996), with a trend toward larger harvests in the 
    most recent years (BPXA 1997). Nuiqsut whalers concentrate their 
    efforts on areas north and east of Cross Island, generally in water 
    depths greater than 65 ft (20 m). Cross Island is the principle field 
    camp location for Nuiqsut whalers and is located within the general 
    area of the proposed seismic area. Thus, the possibility and timing of 
    potential seismic operations in the Cross Island area requires BPXA to 
    provide NMFS with a Plan of Cooperation with North Slope residents 
    (also called the Communications and Avoidance Agreement) to avoid any 
    unmitigable adverse impact on subsistence needs.
        Whalers from the village of Kaktovik search for whales east, north 
    and west of the village. Kaktovik is located 45 mi (72 km) east of the 
    easternmost end of the planned seismic exploration area. The 
    westernmost reported harvest location was about 13 mi (21 km) west of 
    Kaktovik, near 70 deg.10' N, 144 deg.W. That site is about 32 mi (51 
    km) east of the closest part of the primary seismic exploration area 
    (BPXA 1997). However, it should be noted that the eastern portion of 
    the geographic area noted by BPXA for the authorization extends 
    considerably closer to this harvest area.
        Whalers from the village of Barrow search for bowhead whales much 
    further from the planned seismic area, >125 mi (>200 km) west (BPXA 
    1997).
        The location of the proposed seismic activity is south of the main 
    westward migration route of bowhead whales. BPXA (1997) believes that 
    although
    
    [[Page 19556]]
    
    whales may be able to hear the sounds emitted by the seismic array out 
    to a distance of 30 mi (50 km) or more, it is unlikely that changes in 
    migration route will occur at distances of >15 miles (>25 km).
        It is recognized that it is difficult to determine the maximum 
    distance at which reactions occur (Moore and Clark 1992), although 
    whalers believe that some migrating bowheads are deflected by seismic 
    operations at distances greater than those documented by scientific 
    studies done to date. As a result, BPXA is developing a Communications 
    and Avoidance Agreement with the whalers (see BPXA 1997) to reduce any 
    potential interference with the hunt. Also, it is believed that the 
    monitoring plan proposed by BPXA (LGL and Greeneridge 1997) will 
    provide information that will help resolve uncertainties about the 
    effects of seismic exploration on the accessibility of bowheads to 
    hunters.
        In addition, while seismic exploration in the Northstar Unit has 
    some potential to influence subsistence seal hunting activities, the 
    peak season for seal hunting is during the winter months when the 
    harvest consists almost exclusively of ringed seals (BPXA 1997). In 
    summer, boat crews hunt ringed, spotted and bearded seals (BPXA 1997). 
    The most important sealing area for Nuiqsut hunters is off the Colville 
    delta, extending as far west as Fish Creek and as far east as Pingok 
    Island (BPXA 1997). This area overlaps with the westernmost portion of 
    the planned seismic area. In this area, during summer, sealing occurs 
    by boat when hunters apparently concentrate on bearded seals (BPXA 
    1997).
    
    Mitigation
    
        BPXA proposes to continue the mitigation program carried out in 
    1996. BPXA plans to use biological observers to monitor marine mammal 
    presence in the vicinity of the seismic array. To avoid the potential 
    for serious injury to marine mammals, BPXA will power down the seismic 
    source if pinnipeds are sighted:
        (a) within 260 m (853 ft) of an array of >720 in3 and 
    1,320 in3 at 2.5 m (8.3 ft) depth;
        (b) within 130 m (426 ft) of that array operating at >2.5 m (8.3 
    ft) depth;
        (c) within 130 m (426 ft) of an array of >120 in3 and 
    720 in3 operating at 2.5 m (8.3 ft) 
    depth;
        (d) within 60 m (197 ft) of that array operating at <2.5 m="" (8.3="" ft)="" depth;="" and="" (e)="" within="" 60="" m="" (197="" ft)="" of="" a="" single="" airgun="" or="" an="" array="" of="">120 in3.
        BPXA will power down the seismic source if bowhead, gray, or 
    belukha whales are sighted:
        (a) within either 1020 m (3346 ft) of an array >720 in3 
    and 1,320 in3 operating at 2.5m (8.3 
    ft) depth; or
        (b) within 640 m (2100 ft) of that array operating at <2.5 m="" (8.3="" ft)="" depth="" or="" of="" any="" smaller="" airgun="" source="" operating="" at="" any="" depth="" (bpxa="" 1997).="" in="" addition,="" bpxa="" proposes="" to="" ramp-up="" the="" seismic="" source="" to="" operating="" levels="" at="" a="" rate="" no="" greater="" than="" 6="" db/min.="" if="" the="" array="" includes="" airguns="" of="" different="" sizes,="" the="" smallest="" gun="" will="" be="" fired="" first.="" additional="" guns="" will="" be="" added="" at="" intervals="" appropriate="" to="" limit="" the="" rate="" of="" increase="" in="" source="" level="" to="" a="" maximum="" of="" 6="" db/min.="" monitoring="" as="" part="" of="" their="" application="" bpxa="" has="" provided="" a="" monitoring="" plan="" for="" assessing="" impacts="" to="" marine="" mammals="" from="" seismic="" surveys="" in="" the="" beaufort="" sea="" (lgl="" and="" greeneridge="" 1997).="" as="" required="" by="" the="" mmpa,="" this="" monitoring="" plan="" will="" be="" subject="" to="" a="" peer-review="" panel="" of="" technical="" experts="" prior="" to="" formal="" acceptance="" by="" nmfs.="" preliminarily,="" bpxa="" plans="" to="" conduct="" the="" following.="" vessel-based="" visual="" monitoring="" a="" minimum="" of="" two="" biologist-observers="" aboard="" each="" seismic="" vessel="" will="" search="" for="" and="" observe="" marine="" mammals="" whenever="" seismic="" operations="" are="" in="" progress,="" and="" for="" at="" least="" 30="" minutes="" prior="" to="" planned="" start="" of="" shooting.="" these="" observers="" will="" scan="" the="" area="" immediately="" around="" the="" vessels="" with="" reticulated="" binoculars="" during="" the="" daytime="" and="" with="" night-="" vision="" equipment="" during="" the="" night="" (prior="" to="" mid-august,="" there="" are="" no="" hours="" of="" darkness).="" individual="" watches="" will="" normally="" be="" limited="" to="" no="" more="" than="" 4="" consecutive="" hours.="" when="" mammals="" are="" detected="" within="" a="" safety="" zone="" designated="" to="" prevent="" injury="" to="" the="" animals="" (see="" above),="" the="" geophysical="" crew="" leader="" will="" be="" notified="" so="" that="" shutdown="" procedures="" can="" be="" implemented="" immediately.="" aerial="" surveys="" from="" september="" 1,="" 1997,="" until="" the="" seismic="" program="" ends,="" aerial="" surveys="" will="" be="" conducted="" daily,="" weather="" permitting.="" the="" primary="" objective="" will="" be="" to="" document="" the="" occurrence,="" distribution,="" and="" movements="" of="" bowhead="" and="" belukha="" whales="" in="" and="" near="" the="" area="" where="" they="" might="" be="" affected="" by="" the="" seismic="" pulses.="" these="" observations="" will="" be="" used="" to="" estimate="" the="" level="" of="" harassment="" takes="" and="" for="" assessing="" the="" possibility="" that="" seismic="" operations="" affect="" the="" accessibility="" of="" bowhead="" whales="" for="" subsistence="" hunting.="" pinnipeds="" will="" be="" recorded="" when="" seen.="" aerial="" surveys="" will="" be="" at="" an="" altitude="" of="" 1,000="" ft="" (300="" m)="" above="" sea="" level.="" bpxa="" proposes="" to="" avoid="" overflights="" of="" the="" cross="" island="" area="" where="" whalers="" from="" nuiqsut="" are="" based="" during="" their="" fall="" whale="" hunt.="" the="" daily="" aerial="" surveys="" are="" proposed="" to="" cover="" two="" grids:="" a="" grid="" of="" 12="" north-south="" lines="" spaced="" 5="" mi="" (8="" km)="" apart="" and="" extending="" from="" about="" 12.5="" mi="" (20="" km)="" west="" of="" the="" western="" side="" of="" the="" then-current="" seismic="" exploration="" area="" to="" 30="" mi="" (50="" km)="" east="" of="" its="" eastern="" edge,="" and="" from="" the="" barrier="" islands="" north="" to="" approximately="" the="" 100="" m="" (328="" ft)="" depth="" contour;="" a="" grid="" of="" 4="" survey="" lines="" within="" the="" above="" region,="" also="" spaced="" 5="" mi="" (8="" km)="" apart="" and="" mid-way="" between="" the="" longer="" lines,="" to="" provide="" more="" intensive="" coverage="" of="" the="" area="" of="" the="" seismic="" operations="" and="" immediate="" surrounding="" waters.="" acoustical="" measurements="" the="" acoustic="" measurement="" program="" proposed="" for="" 1997="" is="" designed="" to="" be="" a="" sequel="" to="" the="" program="" conducted="" at="" northstar="" in="" 1996="" (see="" bpxa="" 1996a="" and="" 1997,="" lgl="" and="" greeneridge="" 1996b="" and="" 1997="" for="" a="" description="" of="" the="" work="" proposed).="" the="" acoustic="" measurement="" program="" is="" planned="" to="" include="" (1)="" retrieval="" of="" bottom="" recorders="" deployed="" in="" 1996="" and="" analysis="" of="" usable="" data="" contained="" in="" those="" recorders,="" (2)="" boat-based="" acoustic="" measurements,="" and="" (3)="" obc-based="" acoustic="" measurements.="" two="" differences="" between="" the="" 1996="" and="" 1997="" programs="" are="" that="" bpxa="" does="" not="" plan="" to="" deploy="" sonobuoys="" during="" the="" 1997="" aerial="" surveys,="" and="" will="" not="" redeploy="" the="" bottom-mounted="" recorders="" (5="" of="" the="" 10="" units="" remain="" non-functional="" on="" the="" sea="" bottom).="" the="" boat-based="" acoustical="" measurement="" program="" is="" proposed="" for="" a="" 7-="" day="" period="" in="" mid-to="" late-august="" 1996.="" the="" objectives="" of="" this="" survey="" will="" be="" as="" follows:="" (a)="" to="" measure="" the="" levels="" and="" other="" characteristics="" of="" the="" horizontally-propagating="" seismic="" survey="" sounds="" from="" the="" type(s)="" of="" airgun="" array(s)="" to="" be="" used="" in="" 1977="" as="" a="" function="" of="" distance="" and="" aspect="" relative="" to="" the="" seismic="" source="" vessel(s)="" and="" relative="" to="" water="" depth.="" (b)="" to="" measure="" the="" levels="" and="" frequency="" composition="" of="" the="" vessel="" sounds="" emitted="" by="" vessels="" used="" regularly="" during="" the="" 1977="" program,="" excluding="" vessels="" whose="" sounds="" were="" characterized="" adequately="" in="" 1996.="" (c)="" to="" obtain="" additional="" site-specific="" ambient="" noise="" data,="" which="" determine="" signal-to-noise="" ratios="" for="" seismic="" and="" [[page="" 19557]]="" other="" acoustic="" signals="" at="" various="" ranges="" from="" their="" sources.="" new="" to="" the="" acoustic="" measurement="" program="" for="" 1997="" is="" a="" plan="" to="" test="" the="" feasibility="" to="" use="" the="" hydrophones="" in="" the="" obc="" to="" measure="" received="" levels="" and="" characteristics="" of="" airgun="" pulses="" over="" a="" large="" area="" (about="" 3.3x5.9="" km)="" simultaneously.="" if="" practical,="" this="" would="" provide="" more="" comprehensive="" data="" while="" at="" the="" same="" time="" reducing="" the="" need="" for="" labor-="" intensive="" boat-based="" acoustic="" measurements.="" estimates="" of="" marine="" mammal="" take="" estimates="" of="" takes="" by="" harassment="" will="" be="" made="" through="" vessel="" and="" aerial="" surveys.="" preliminarily,="" bpxa="" will="" estimate="" the="" number="" of:="" (a)="" marine="" mammals="" observed="" within="" the="" area="" ensonified="" strongly="" by="" the="" seismic="" vessel;="" (b)="" marine="" mammals="" observed="" showing="" apparent="" reactions="" to="" seismic="" pulses="" (e.g.,="" heading="" away="" from="" the="" seismic="" vessel="" in="" an="" atypical="" direction);="" (c)="" marine="" mammals="" subject="" to="" take="" by="" type="" (a)="" or="" (b)="" above="" when="" no="" monitoring="" observations="" were="" possible;="" and="" (d)="" bowheads="" displaced="" seaward="" from="" the="" main="" migration="" corridor.="" reporting="" bpxa="" will="" provide="" an="" initial="" report="" on="" 1997="" activities="" to="" nmfs="" within="" 90="" days="" of="" the="" completion="" of="" the="" seismic="" program.="" this="" report="" will="" provide="" dates="" and="" locations="" of="" seismic="" operations,="" details="" of="" marine="" mammal="" sightings,="" estimates="" of="" the="" amount="" and="" nature="" of="" all="" takes="" by="" harassment,="" and="" any="" apparent="" effects="" on="" accessibility="" of="" marine="" mammals="" to="" subsistence="" users.="" a="" final="" technical="" report="" will="" be="" provided="" by="" bpxa="" within="" 20="" working="" days="" of="" receipt="" of="" the="" document="" from="" the="" contractor,="" but="" no="" later="" than="" april="" 30,="" 1998.="" the="" final="" technical="" report="" will="" contain="" a="" description="" of="" the="" methods,="" results,="" and="" interpretation="" of="" all="" monitoring="" tasks.="" consultation="" under="" section="" 7="" of="" the="" endangered="" species="" act,="" nmfs="" completed="" an="" informal="" consultation="" on="" the="" issuance="" of="" an="" incidental="" harassment="" authorization="" for="" this="" activity="" on="" july="" 15,="" 1996.="" a="" copy="" of="" that="" document="" is="" available="" upon="" request="" (see="" addresses).="" national="" environmental="" policy="" act="" (nepa)="" in="" conjunction="" with="" the="" 1996="" notice="" of="" proposed="" authorization="" (61="" fr="" 26501,="" may="" 28,="" 1996),="" nmfs="" released="" an="" ea="" that="" addressed="" the="" impacts="" on="" the="" human="" environment="" from="" issuance="" of="" the="" authorization="" and="" the="" alternatives="" to="" the="" proposed="" action.="" no="" comments="" were="" received="" on="" that="" document="" and,="" on="" july="" 18,="" 1996,="" nmfs="" concluded="" that="" neither="" implementation="" of="" the="" proposed="" authorization="" to="" bpxa="" for="" the="" harassment="" of="" small="" numbers="" of="" several="" species="" of="" marine="" mammals="" incidental="" to="" conducting="" seismic="" surveys="" during="" the="" open="" water="" season="" in="" the="" northstar="" unit="" and="" nearby="" waters="" in="" the="" u.s.="" beaufort="" sea,="" nor="" the="" alternatives="" to="" that="" action,="" would="" significantly="" affect="" the="" quality="" of="" the="" human="" environment.="" as="" a="" result,="" the="" preparation="" of="" an="" environmental="" impact="" statement="" on="" this="" action="" is="" not="" required="" by="" section="" 102(2)="" of="" nepa="" or="" its="" implementing="" regulations.="" a="" copy="" of="" the="" ea="" is="" available="" upon="" request="" (see="" addresses).="" conclusions="" nmfs="" has="" preliminarily="" determined="" that="" the="" short-term="" impact="" of="" conducting="" seismic="" surveys="" in="" the="" northstar="" unit="" of="" the="" beaufort="" sea="" will="" result,="" at="" worst,="" in="" a="" temporary="" modification="" in="" behavior="" by="" certain="" species="" of="" cetaceans.="" while="" behavioral="" modifications="" may="" be="" made="" by="" these="" species="" of="" cetaceans="" to="" avoid="" the="" resultant="" noise,="" this="" behavioral="" change="" is="" expected="" to="" have="" a="" negligible="" impact="" on="" the="" animals.="" as="" the="" number="" of="" potential="" incidental="" harassment="" takes="" will="" depend="" on="" the="" distribution="" and="" abundance="" of="" marine="" mammals="" (which="" vary="" annually="" due="" to="" variable="" ice="" conditions="" and="" other="" factors)="" in="" the="" area="" of="" seismic="" operations,="" due="" to="" the="" distribution="" and="" abundance="" of="" marine="" mammals="" during="" the="" projected="" period="" of="" activity="" and="" the="" location="" of="" the="" proposed="" seismic="" activity="" in="" waters="" generally="" too="" shallow="" and="" distant="" from="" the="" edge="" of="" the="" pack="" ice="" for="" most="" marine="" mammals="" of="" concern,="" the="" number="" of="" potential="" harassment="" takings="" is="" estimated="" to="" be="" small.="" in="" addition,="" no="" take="" by="" injury="" and/or="" death="" is="" anticipated="" and="" the="" potential="" for="" temporary="" or="" permanent="" hearing="" impairment="" will="" be="" avoided="" through="" incorporation="" of="" the="" mitigation="" measures="" mentioned="" above.="" no="" rookeries,="" mating="" grounds,="" areas="" of="" concentrated="" feeding,="" or="" other="" areas="" of="" special="" significance="" for="" marine="" mammals="" occur="" within="" or="" near="" the="" planned="" area="" of="" operations="" during="" the="" season="" of="" operations.="" because="" bowhead="" whales="" are="" east="" of="" the="" seismic="" area="" in="" the="" canadian="" beaufort="" sea="" until="" late="" august/early="" september,="" seismic="" activities="" are="" not="" expected="" to="" impact="" subsistence="" hunting="" of="" bowhead="" whales="" prior="" to="" that="" date.="" after="" august="" 31,="" 1997,="" bpxa="" will="" initiate="" aerial="" survey="" flights="" for="" bowhead="" whale="" assessments.="" appropriate="" mitigation="" measures="" to="" avoid="" an="" unmitigable="" adverse="" impact="" on="" the="" availability="" of="" bowhead="" whales="" for="" subsistence="" needs="" will="" be="" the="" subject="" of="" consultation="" between="" bpxa="" and="" subsistence="" users.="" also,="" while="" summer="" seismic="" exploration="" in="" the="" northstar="" unit="" has="" some="" potential="" to="" influence="" seal="" hunting="" activities="" by="" residents="" of="" nuiqsut,="" because="" (1)="" the="" peak="" sealing="" season="" is="" during="" the="" winter="" months,="" (2)="" the="" main="" summer="" sealing="" is="" off="" the="" colville="" delta="" (west="" and="" inshore="" of="" northstar),="" and="" (3)="" the="" zone="" of="" influence="" by="" seismic="" sources="" on="" belukha="" and="" seals="" is="" fairly="" small,="" nmfs="" believes="" the="" northstar="" seismic="" survey="" will="" not="" have="" an="" unmitigable="" adverse="" impact="" on="" the="" availability="" of="" these="" stocks="" for="" subsistence="" uses.="" proposed="" authorization="" nmfs="" proposes="" to="" issue="" an="" incidental="" harassment="" authorization="" for="" the="" 1997="" beaufort="" sea="" open="" water="" season="" for="" a="" seismic="" survey="" in="" and="" near="" the="" northstar="" unit="" provided="" the="" above="" mentioned="" mitigation,="" monitoring="" and="" reporting="" requirements="" are="" incorporated.="" nmfs="" has="" preliminarily="" determined="" that="" the="" proposed="" seismic="" activity="" would="" result="" in="" the="" harassment="" of="" only="" small="" numbers="" of="" bowhead="" whales,="" gray="" whales,="" and="" possibly="" belukha="" whales,="" bearded="" seals,="" and="" largha="" seals;="" will="" have="" a="" negligible="" impact="" on="" these="" marine="" mammal="" stocks;="" and="" will="" not="" have="" an="" unmitigable="" adverse="" impact="" on="" the="" availability="" of="" these="" stocks="" for="" subsistence="" uses.="" information="" solicited="" nmfs="" requests="" interested="" persons="" to="" submit="" comments,="" information,="" and="" suggestions="" concerning="" this="" request="" (see="" addresses).="" dated:="" april="" 16,="" 1997.="" hilda="" diaz-soltero,="" acting="" director,="" office="" of="" protected="" resources,="" national="" marine="" fisheries="" service.="" [fr="" doc.="" 97-10254="" filed="" 4-21-97;="" 8:45="" am]="" billing="" code="" 3510-22-p="">

Document Information

Published:
04/22/1997
Department:
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of receipt of application and proposed authorization for a small take exemption; request for comments.
Document Number:
97-10254
Dates:
Comments and information must be received no later than May 22, 1997.
Pages:
19553-19557 (5 pages)
Docket Numbers:
I.D. 040497A
PDF File:
97-10254.pdf