[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 78 (Friday, April 23, 1999)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20130-20132]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-10251]
[[Page 20129]]
_______________________________________________________________________
Part VI
Federal Trade Commission
_______________________________________________________________________
Public Workshop: Market Power and Consumer Protection Issues Involved
With Encouraging Competition in the U.S. Electric Industry; Notice
Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 78 / Friday, April 23, 1999 /
Notices
[[Page 20130]]
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Public Workshop: Market Power and Consumer Protection Issues
Involved With Encouraging Competition in the U.S. Electric Industry
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice announcing the dates of workshop.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Trade Commission has set September 13-14, 1999 as
the dates for its public workshop examining the market power and
consumer protection issues involved with encouraging competition in the
U.S. electric industry.
DATES: The workshop will be held September 13 and 14, 1999 in the
Commission Meeting Room (Room 432), 600 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20580.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions about the workshop,
contact: Michael Wroblewski, Office of Policy Planning, Federal Trade
Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580,
telephone 202-326-2155, e-mail mwroblewski@ftc.gov; John C. Hilke,
Bureau of Economics, Federal Trade Commission, 1961 Stout Street, Suite
1523, Denver, CO 80294-0101, telephone 303-844-3565, e-mail
jhilke@ftc.gov; Gina Schaar Howard, Bureau of Consumer Protection,
Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C.
20580, telephone 202-326-2982, e-mail ghoward@ftc.gov; or David Balto,
Bureau of Competition, Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Ave.,
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580, telephone 202-326-2881, e-mail
dbalto@ftc.gov.
To preregister for the workshop, contact Wendy Givler, National
Research Regulatory Institute at The Ohio State University, 1080
Carmack Road, Columbus, Ohio 43210, telephone (614) 292-9106, e-mail
givler.4@osu.edu.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Retail Electricity: Promise and Progress Workshop
Overview
In recent years, states and the Federal government have taken steps
to encourage restructuring and competition in the electricity industry,
including the elimination of regulatory barriers. The FTC recognizes
these issues are vast and interrelated and that states could derive
substantial benefit from sharing ideas and experiences in these areas.
The FTC seeks to convene a workshop that will allow such idea sharing
on two topics that bear directly on the FTC's expertise--market power
(e.g. evaluating and addressing horizontal market power concerns in
generation) and consumer protection (e.g. disclosures by electric
service providers of environmental attributes of power they are
selling). The intent of the workshop is to provide a forum for
discussing the experience under policies that have been implemented at
the state level, rather than attempting to provide all of the answers
to a complex set of issues that vary by region and locale. The FTC
anticipates that a robust exchange of views and ideas among those
working on the issues will prove stimulating and useful as the
regulatory reform process moves forward. To facilitate discussion of
how states have addressed these two issues, each of the panels in the
workshop will be moderated by the FTC (or the U.S. Department of
Justice, Antitrust Division), so that we can gain a better
understanding of the issues involved and be available as a resource.
Although there are many other issues that policymakers are considering
in the electric industry restructuring debate, discussion will focus on
how states have addressed market power and consumer protection
concerns.
Workshop Goals
1. Provide state regulators and state attorneys general a forum in
which they can describe and discuss present and expected results of
state regulatory reform efforts in the electric power industry with a
focus on market power and consumer protection strategies to ensure that
consumers benefit from regulatory reform.
2. Provide an opportunity for the Commission and the staff to gain
a better understanding of the issues involved in the regulatory reform
process so that we can serve as a resource with respect to market power
and consumer protection issues.
Registration and Participants
The workshop will focus on issues of concern to state regulators
and state attorneys general. State commissioners, attorneys general and
their staffs from states active in promoting retail electricity
competition will be invited to participate as panelists as described in
the following proposed workshop agenda. Suppliers, customers, public
policy and interest groups and/or representatives from academia that
have experience with these state efforts also will be invited to
participate as panelists. Other state commissioners, attorneys general
and their staff are encouraged and welcome to attend. Electricity
industry groups, marketers, suppliers and customers are invited to
attend as well.
The National Regulatory Research Institute (NRRI) and the National
Council on Competition and the Electric Industry (NCCEI) are co-
sponsoring the workshop. NRRI will handle registration. To ensure
space, attendees are encouraged to preregister by September 3, 1999. To
preregister, contact Wendy Givler, National Research Regulatory
Institute at The Ohio State University, 1080 Carmack Road, Columbus,
Ohio 43210, telephone (614) 292-9106, e-mail givler.4@osu.edu.
Proposed Workshop Agenda
First Day
Introduction Address 9 a.m. (15 minutes)--Representatives of the
sponsoring organizations (FTC, NRRI, and NCCEI) will provide an
introduction by establishing the framework for the two-day workshop and
providing an overview concerning the focus of the workshop on market
power and consumer protection issues involved as states move toward
retail electricity competition.
Session I: Retail Competition in Pioneer States
Panel A: What Approaches Did Pioneer States take in Promoting Retail
Electricity Competition?
(9:15 a.m.-10:00 a.m.)
State policymakers (state commissioners or staff) from pioneer
states (states active in promoting retail electricity competition) will
be asked to discuss the approach and structure each state used or is
using to proceed with electricity restructuring. In order to provide
guidance and to share experiences with other states considering
restructuring, each panelist will be asked to provide an assessment of
the best and worst of his/her state's experience, as well as describe
the most significant decisions made in restructuring the provision of
electricity at the retail level Examples of the types of issues
panelists might raise include:
The approach and process the state used to address
regulatory reform and restructuring;
Types of services (e.g., generation, metering & billing)
subject to competition;
Elimination of entry barriers (e.g., streamline of siting
requirements);
Effects on consumer choice of various competitive
transition charges that have been implemented; and
Consumer education efforts aimed at retail electricity
competition.
[[Page 20131]]
Break (10:00 a.m.-10:15 a.m.)
Panel B: Assessment of the Results to Date of Pioneer State Reform
Efforts
(10:15 a.m.-12:00 p.m.)
Panelists representing suppliers, customers, public policy and
interest groups and/or academia will be asked to assess the positive
and negative results of state retail electricity restructuring efforts,
and the reasons therefor, with an emphasis on:
Types of products and services that have been offered in
the states where retail competition has been implemented;
Percentage of industrial, commercial and residential
customers switching to new service providers; and
Electricity pricing trends for industrial, commercial and
residential customers in a deregulated environment.
Lunch Break (12:00 p.m.-1:15 p.m.)
Session II: Existing Market Power in Retail Markets
Panel A: How Have States Addressed Existing Market Power?
(1:15 p.m.-2:15 p.m.)
Panelists (state attorneys general, commissioners or staff) will be
asked to discuss how each state addressed existing market power of
incumbent utilities, if any.
Approaches states have taken with respect to evaluating
and addressing concerns about horizontal market power (in the
generation sector) of incumbent utilities (e.g., divestiture, ISOs).
Approaches states have taken with respect to evaluating
and addressing vertical discrimination and cross-subsidization (e.g.,
use of ISOs, divestiture, codes of conduct).
Break (2:15 p.m.-2:30 p.m.)
Panel B: Assessment of State Efforts to Address Existing Market Power
(2:30 p.m.-3:45 p.m.)
Panelists representing suppliers, customers, public policy and
interest groups and/or academia will be asked to discuss the positive
and negative results of state efforts to evaluate and address existing
market power, if any, held by incumbent utilities. FTC staff also will
assist in this discussion by presenting possible approaches to address
and remedy market power by:
Applying the factors in the DOJ/FTC Horizontal Merger
Guidelines to assess existing market power (horizontal);
Considering alternative future scenarios based upon
different possible remedies;
Providing access to the information necessary for an
appropriate analysis;
Using computer simulations to assess market power.
Break (3:45 p.m.-4:00 p.m.)
Session III: How Does Wholesale Competition for Generation Affect
Retail Electricity Competition?
(4:00 p.m.-5:30 p.m.)
Panelists (federal policymakers, academics, or representatives from
public policy groups) will be asked to discuss the links between
wholesale competition and retail competition and whether competitive
wholesale generation electricity markets are necessary for competition
to emerge at the retail level. The topics will include:
Consideration of regional transmission organizations;
Use of new technologies (distributed generation) that
facilitate entry;
Congestion pricing through locational marginal pricing and
the use of firm transmission rights;
Role of North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC)
and reliability monitoring; and
Implications of the wholesale price spikes of the past
year for prospective retail electricity competition.
Second Day
Session IV: Affiliate Rules or Codes of Conduct
Panel A: How Have States Developed Affiliate Rules or Codes of Conduct?
(9:00 a.m.-10:00 a.m.)
Panelists (state attorneys general, commissioners or staff) will be
asked to discuss how each state has used affiliate rules or codes of
conduct to remedy problems posed by incumbent utilities' market power
and to prevent deceptive practices. Topics of discussion will include:
Types of affiliate entities created by utilities for unregulated
activities;
The potential for cross-subsidization between a utility
and its affiliates, including controls to avoid cross-subsidization;
Unregulated affiliates' use of incumbent utilities' names/
logos--varieties of use and possibility for consumer confusion; and
Remedies to avoid consumer deception regarding the
relationship between the incumbent utility and the affiliate--
disclosures regarding the relationship versus a ban on use of the
utility name and logo by the affiliate.
Break (10:00 a.m.-10:15 a.m.)
Panel B: Assessment of State Use of Affiliate Rules or Codes of Conduct
(10:15 a.m.-12:00 p.m.)
Panelists representing suppliers, customers, public policy and
interest groups and/or academia will be asked to assess the positive
and negative results of state use of affiliate rules or codes of
conduct with an emphasis on:
Effect (enhancement vs. inhibition) on competition;
Consumer expectations and reactions; and
Relationship between these rules and the offering and
pricing of new/innovative products.
Lunch Break (12:00 p.m.-1:30 p.m.)
Session V: Advertising and disclosures of Environmental Attributes
and Price
(1:30 p.m.-3:00 p.m.)
Panelists (state attorneys general, commissioners, public policy
and interest groups, or industry consultants) will be asked to discuss
the trends in advertising environmental claims, labeling requirements,
and tracking systems. FTC staff would lead off with a summary of its
Green Guide comment to the National Association of Attorneys General
(NAAG).
Description of existing remedies for deceptive claims--
jurisdiction (i.e., attorneys general, state commissions, or both);
whether these remedies are sufficient or whether new legal authority is
needed; need for additional industry guidance from regulators (e.g.,
Electricity Green Guides).
Mandated disclosure of information--current requirements;
effect on consumers and the market; relationship to advertising.
Verification or auditing of company-supplied information--
state experience thus far.
Issues with systems for tracking fuel mix--cost;
prevention of ``double counting'' of a fuel source; substantiation that
a product has not been ``double counted''; the Western states' current
views and plans on using a ``tradable tags'' system.
Break (3:00 p.m.-3:15 p.m.)
Session VI: Supplier Practices in a Retail Environment
(3:15 p.m.-4:45 p.m.)
Panelists (state attorneys general, commissioners, public policy
and interest groups, or industry consultants) will be asked to discuss
existing legislation/regulations on slamming/cramming issues,
licensing/bonding of
[[Page 20132]]
service providers and credit and billing practices of service
providers.
Slamming and cramming--extent of problem; adequacy of
existing remedies; preventing fraud without creating unnecessary
barriers to entry or legitimate innovative marketing techniques.
Licensing and bonding--deterring unscrupulous competitors
without discouraging legitimate new entrants; protecting incumbent
utilities vs. protecting consumers.
Credit laws and regulations--applicability of Truth in
Lending Act (TILA), Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA), etc. to
suppliers and utilities under various billing schemes; consumer privacy
concerns arising from exchange of account information for switching or
billing purposes; account information access and sharing between
utilities and suppliers.
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 99-10251 Filed 4-22-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-P