2020-08559. Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2017  

  • Start Preamble

    AGENCY:

    Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

    Start Printed Page 22719

    SUMMARY:

    The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers/exporters of passenger vehicle and light truck tires from the People's Republic of China (China) during the period of review (POR) January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017.

    DATES:

    Applicable April 23, 2020.

    Start Further Info

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

    Andrew Huston, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4261.

    Background

    Commerce published the Preliminary Results of this administrative review in the Federal Register on October 18, 2019.[1] We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. On December 2, 2019, we received case briefs from the following interested parties: Cooper (Kunshan) Tire Co., Ltd. (Cooper); Shandong Longyue Rubber Co., Ltd. (Longyue); the Government of China (GOC); and Vogue Tyre & Rubber Co., Ltd., Sailun Jinyu Group Co., Ltd. and its affiliates, Sailun Jinyu Group (Hong Kong) Co., Limited, Sailun Tire International Corp., Shandong Jinyu Industrial Co., Ltd., Seatex International Inc., Seatex PTE. Ltd., Dynamic Tire Corp., and Husky Tire Corp., Shandong Wanda Boto Tyre Co., Ltd., and ITG Voma Corporation (collectively, Other Interested Parties). On December 13, 2019, the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers Union, AFL-CIO (the petitioner) submitted a rebuttal brief. On February 5, 2020, Commerce extended the period for issuing the final results of this review until April 15, 2020.[2]

    Scope of the Order

    The products covered by the order are certain passenger vehicle and light truck tires from the China. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.[3]

    Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in interested parties' briefs are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum accompanying this notice. A list of the issues raised by interested parties and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is provided in Appendix I to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be access directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/​frn/​. The signed and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.

    Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on case briefs and evidence on the record, we made certain changes from the Preliminary Results. Commerce has changed the carbon black benchmark for both respondents, adjusted the denominator used for subsidies received by Cooper's affiliate Qingdao Ge Rui Da Rubber Co., Ltd., and corrected various ministerial errors for both respondents. These changes are explained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

    Methodology

    Commerce conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For each of the subsidy programs found to be countervailable, we find that there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution from a government or public entity that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.[4] For a full description of the methodology underlying all of Commerce's conclusions, including any determination that relied upon the use of adverse facts available pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

    Final Results of Administrative Review

    In accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5), we calculated a countervailable subsidy rate for the mandatory respondents, Cooper and Longyue. For the non-selected companies subject to this review,[5] we followed Commerce's practice, which is to base the subsidy rates on an average of the subsidy rates calculated for those companies selected for individual review, excluding de minimis rates or rates based entirely on adverse facts available.[6] In this case, for the non-selected companies, we have calculated a rate by weight-averaging the calculated subsidy rates of Cooper and Longyue using their publicly-ranged sales data for exports of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR. We find the countervailable subsidy rates for the producers/exporters under review to be as follows:

    CompanySubsidy rate (%)
    Cooper (Kunshan) Tire Co., Ltd. (Cooper) 717.15
    Shandong Longyue Rubber Co., Ltd. (Longyue)27.00
    Non-Selected Companies Under Review 820.05

    Disclosure

    We will disclose to the parties in this proceeding the calculations performed for these final results within five days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register.[9]

    Assessment Rates

    Consistent with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), we intend to issue assessment instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 15 days after the date of publication of these final results of review, to liquidate shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption, on or after January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017, at the ad valorem rates listed above.

    Cash Deposit Instructions

    In accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Act, we intend to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties in the amounts shown for each of the respective Start Printed Page 22720companies listed above. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.

    Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.

    Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Start Signature

    Dated: April 15, 2020.

    Jeffrey I. Kessler,

    Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

    End Signature

    Appendix I

    List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

    I. Summary

    II. Background

    III. List of Comments From Interested Parties

    IV. Scope of the Order

    V. Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    VI. Non-Selected Companies Under Review

    VII. Subsidies Valuation Information

    1. Allocation Period

    2. Attribution of Subsidies

    3. Denominators

    4. Benchmarks and Discount Rates

    VIII. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse Inferences

    IX. Programs Determined To Be Countervailable

    X. Programs Determined Not To Be Used or Not To Confer Measurable Benefits During the POR

    XI. Analysis of Comments

    Comment 1: Government Policy Lending Calculation

    Comment 2: Uncreditworthy Benchmark Interest Rate

    Comment 3: Export Buyer's Credit (EBC), Usage by Respondents

    Comment 4: Export Buyer's Credit, AFA Rate

    Comment 5: Carbon Black Market Distortion

    Comment 6: Carbon Black Benchmark, Tier 2 Data Issues

    Comment 7: Ocean Freight and Import Duties Added to Tier 1 or Tier 2 Benchmarks

    Comment 8: Other Subsidies

    Comment 9: Inland Freight Expenses for Cooper and GRT's Carbon Black Benchmark

    Comment 10: Cooper's Loan Benefit Calculation

    Comment 11: GRT's Subsidies

    Comment 12: GRT Land Benefit Calculation

    Comment 13: GRT's Grant Benefit Calculation

    Comment 14: Longyue's Loan Benchmarks

    Comment 15: Longyue's Land Benefit Calculation

    XII. Recommendation

    Appendix—Non-Selected Companies Under Review

    Appendix II

    Non-Selected Companies Under Review

    1. Anhui Jichi Tire Co., Ltd.

    2. Bridgestone (Tianjin) Tire Co., Ltd.

    3. Bridgestone Corporation

    4. Dynamic Tire Corp.

    5. Hankook Tire China Co., Ltd.

    6. Husky Tire Corp.

    7. Jiangsu Hankook Tire Co., Ltd.

    8. Mayrun Tyre (Hong Kong) Limited

    9. Qingdao Fullrun Tyre Corp., Ltd.

    10. Qingdao Sunfulcess Tyre Co., Ltd.[10]

    11. Sailun Jinyu Group Co., Ltd.

    12. Sailun Jinyu Group (Hong Kong) Co., Limited

    13. Sailun Tire International Corp.

    14. Seatex International Inc.

    15. Seatex PTE, Ltd.

    16. Shandong Achi Tyres Co., Ltd.

    17. Shandong Anchi Tyres Co., Ltd.

    18. Shandong Duratti Rubber Corporation Co., Ltd.

    19. Shandong Haohua Tire Co., Ltd.

    20. Shandong Hengyu Science & Technology Co., Ltd.

    21. Shandong Jinyu Industrial Co., Ltd.

    22. Shandong Province Sanli Tire Manufactured Co., Ltd.

    23. Shandong Wanda Boto Tyre Co., Ltd.

    24. Triangle Tyre Co., Ltd.

    25. Winrun Tyre Co., Ltd.

    End Further Info End Preamble

    Footnotes

    1.  See Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review and Rescission, in Part; 2017, 84 FR 55913 (October 18, 2019) (Preliminary Results) and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).

    Back to Citation

    2.  See Memorandum, “Administrative Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from the People's Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for Final Results,” dated February 15, 2020.

    Back to Citation

    3.  See “Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Administrative Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from the People's Republic of China; 2017,” dated concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum) and hereby adopted by this notice.

    Back to Citation

    4.  See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.

    Back to Citation

    5.  See Appendix II.

    Back to Citation

    6.  See, e.g., Certain Pasta from Italy: Preliminary Results of the 13th (2008) Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 18806, 18811 (April 13, 2010), unchanged in Certain Pasta from Italy: Final Results of the 13th (2008) Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 37386 (June 29, 2010).

    Back to Citation

    7.  As discussed in the Preliminary Results PDM, Cooper is cross-owned with Cooper Tire Asia-Pacific (Shanghai) Trading Co., Ltd., Cooper Tire (China) Investment Co. Ltd., and Qingdao Ge Rui Da Rubber Co., Ltd.

    8.  See Appendix II.

    Back to Citation

    10.  This company was mistakenly listed in the Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 83 FR 50077 (October 4, 2018), and Preliminary Results as Qingdao Sunfulcess Trye Co., Ltd.

    Back to Citation

    [FR Doc. 2020-08559 Filed 4-22-20; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

Document Information

Published:
04/23/2020
Department:
International Trade Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
2020-08559
Dates:
Applicable April 23, 2020.
Pages:
22718-22720 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
C-570-017
PDF File:
2020-08559.pdf